DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes July 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes July 2020 ALFOLD PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES of the Alfold Parish Council Annual Meeting held on Tuesday 14th July 2020 held via Zoom at 7.30pm. Present: Mrs Penni Mayne (Chairman), Mr. Adrian Erricker (Vice Chairman), Mr. Rick Dyer, Mrs. Mary Brown, Mr Denton-Miller Mr. Chris Britton, Mr. Wayne Mouring, Mrs Julie Flenley (Clerk), Mr. Kevin Deanus (WBC Councillor). Two members of the public were in attendance. Apologies: None ACTION 20/074 Representations from members of the public. None. 20/075 To receive declarations of interest pertaining to agenda items. None 20/076 To receive for confirmation Minutes of Meeting held on 11th June 2020. Agreed. 20/077 Chairman’s report Cllr Mayne reported that Dan Church was happy with the work Titchmarsh’s carried out on the adjacent cemetery land and that he had commenced building of his fence. There was also some more general cleaning up of the Cllr Mayne cemetery to be done and that a working party would be looked at in the and Cllr future to carry out the works. Erricker Cllr Mayne also reported that correspondence had been received from a Loxwood resident about pre application on a site at Loxwood Claypits. The Clerk had conducted preliminary searches but found no further information in the public domain but will await a response back from her email. Cllr Mayne noted that a meeting had not been diarised for August but would schedule a meeting if anything was to come in. Also noted that Cllr Britton would be attending a meeting with Surrey Highways with regards to improvements in the village. 20/078 Clerk’s progress report The Clerk reported that the Audit was in progress and that the last loose ends were being tied up. All accounting practices had been carried out and that the AGAR would go as planned to the internal auditor. The Clerk reported that expenditure was as expected and that a forecasting exercise was also being carried out in order to understand what funds were held by Alfold and what we could commit to in terms of projects going forward. The Clerk also reported that the cemetery extension was moving along – she had been in contact with Cemetery Development Service (CDS) with regards to mapping, steel grave markers and that the extension ought to be completed by the end of the year. The Clerk reported that the Floods Forum was being restarted and that a date had been set with Angela Richardson’s office for a meeting on 18th Clerk September. She was in the process of finding contacts at the various stakeholder parties and when this is done, she will send out the Zoom invite. 20/079 To receive report from Waverley Borough Councillor Cllr Deanus reported that he had had a meeting at Sweeters Copse and had confirmation that the builders would be off site by the end of August/September and that the common land was discussed; the land would have to be dug up and reseeded and to enclose the common land in fencing to ensure it does not become confused with the gardens of the dwelling. He also noted that A106 money for highways works at Sweeters would be due soon. Cllr Britton also noted that there was ambiguity in terms of what was altered under the S106 Agreement under application S52/2018/0008. Clerk to clarify what works were confirmed for the entrance to Sweeters Copse with the planning officer at Waverley Borough Council. Cllr Deanus also reported that Surrey County Council were considering applying to become a Unitary Authority which would, if approved, make it the biggest in the country and with a potential end date of April 2020. It is however early days and Councillors needed to be mindful of potential implications. Cllr Deanus to update when he has further information. Also reported that there were many GTR encampments which are moving within the borough but the barrier was in place at Alfold Rec which should act as a deterrent. 20/080 Dunsfold Park update. Councillors discussed the recent webinar which was attended by Alfold Councillors on the Town and Country Planning Act. Cllr Britton noted that the Waverley Head of Planning noted that there was an additional 4 weeks consultation on the Masterplan but that there was still no mention of the Cllr Deanus local Parish Councils being involved in the Governance process which was worrying. Cllr Deanus confirmed that he had raised this issue several times but he was still pushing for an answer, and would raise it once more at the full Waverley Council meeting in two weeks time. Agreed that Alfold Parish Council would draft a letter questioning the Governance procedure at Waverley and why Parish Councils were not being Cllrs involved when we want to be. This question would be asked in full at the Britton, meeting. Cllr Deanus also said that he would field the question at the same Mayne and meeting. Noted that the question date was imminent and that the letter Clerk enclosing the question should be actioned urgently. 20/081 Neighbourhood Plan update. Cllr Denton-Miller noted that the SEA Screening Opinion Request had been submitted this week and that he wasn’t sure how long Waverley had to respond to the application. Looking at funding packages to see what further Cllr work ACOM can do. Cllr Denton-Miller to update. Denton- Miller Cllr Denton-Miller also confirmed that he had received the first draft of the design code document and it looked good. 20/082 Correspondence The Clerk confirmed that she had received confirmation from Thakenham stating that they were going to review their plans in light of comments from villagers. She also confirmed that an email exchange had occurred between the Parish Council and Ryan Crumley who wished to discuss his proposals at Alfold Business Park and that she had asked him to make representations directly to the Councillors at our monthly meetings where it can be recorded. The Clerk also confirmed that the issue with the overgrowth at the cemetery boundary which abuts the Old Rectory had been resolved; Titchmarsh’s had attended the site and had done a good job and that she had been thanked by the owner of the property. The Clerk also noted that there had been a Notice served on the GRT community at Stovolds for a breach of Planning Regulations and Cllr Britton then noted that an Injunction had been served. Cllr Britton also reported that positive moves had been made to establish a relationship with the GRT Community in order to assist interactions going forward which has come as a result of the UKOG Oil Application. 20/083 To receive a list of Planning Applications for information if recent decisions made by WBC and Appeal and Planning Inquiry cases - WA/2020/0719 – Former Turtles Farm Lodge, Rosemary Lane, Alfold. PENDING - WA/2020/0737 – 9 Brockhurst Cottages, Dunsfold road, Alfold, GU6 8JD. FULL PERMISSION - WA/2020/0645 – High Stovolds Farm, Stovolds Hill, Cranleigh, GU6 8LE. PENDING - WA/2020/0644 – High Stovolds Farm, Stovolds Hill, Cranleigh, GU6 8LE. PENDING - PRA/2020/0009 – Glebelands Farm, Loxwood Road, Alfold. PENDING - WA/2020/0571 - 1 Crossways Cottage, Guildford road, Alfold, GU6 8HF. FULL PERMISSION - WA/2020/0523 – 17 Clappers Meadow, Alfold, GU6 8HH. PENDING - WA/2020/0260 – Land at coordinates 504360 134890, Horsham Road, Alfold. PENDING - S52/2020/0004 – Land West of Sweeters Copse, Loxwood Road. PENDING - WA/2020/0474 – Land adjoining Brockhurst Farm, Alfold Crossways. PENDING - WA/2019/0796 - Loxley Oil Well. REFUSED - WA/2020/0260 - Land Coordinates 504360 134890, Horsham Road, Alfold (Land at the BP Garage), PENDING Councillors noted the above. 20/084 To consider all new Planning Applications a) WA/2020/0964 – Linden Farm, Rosemary Lane. Erection of a storage shed and construction of a cycle path. Cllrs noted and no comments were made. b) WA/2020/0997 – 1 Alfold Cottages, Loxwood Road. Erection of outbuilding following demolition of existing (revision of WA/2020/0305). Cllr Dyer noted that the outbuilding had been altered to fit the area which does not lend to Clerk maintenance being carried out on site without encroaching on the neighbours property. Clerk to write a letter. c) WA/2020/0909 – Sidney Lodge, Rosemary Lane. Erection of extension and alterations to elevations. Cllrs noted and no objections noted. 20/085 AOB Cllr Britton asked Cllr Brown about the Better Help Partnerships as he had a correspondence with Smart Cranleigh who want to assist parish councils post Cllr Brown COVID to help vulnerable people. Cllr Brown volunteered to start liaising with Smart Cranleigh and would report back. Cllr Erricker requested that the Clerk look into adopt the village phone box, which has fallen into a state of disrepair but is a vital village asset in the Conservation Clerk and Area. Cllr Erricker Cllr Erricker also asked about the posts around the crease of land by the Church where Waverley had installed the posts in the wrong area. Clerk confirmed that Clerk she would look into it. Cllr Mouring also asked for an update on the playground as it was in need of maintenance work on some equipment. The Clerk confirmed that there was a budget and that maintenance work could be carried out with the assistance of a handyman and in line with the ROSPA report recommendations which had Clerk recently been done. The Clerk also suggested that a working party attend the site with her in order to ascertain the general condition of the play equipment. Clerk to set meeting date. 20/020/086 To receive items of business for information or inclusion on a future agenda None NoN 20/087 Next meetings Planning Meeting, Parish Council – 8th September 2020 at 7.30pm, via Zoom due to Coronavirus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frensham Parish Council
    Frensham Parish Council Village Design Statement Contents 1. What is a VDS? 2. Introduction & History 3. Open Spaces & Landscape 4. Buildings – Style & Detail 5. Highways & Byways 6. Sports & rural Pursuits Summary Guidelines & Action Points Double page spread of parish map in the centre of document Appendix: Listed Buildings & Artefacts in Parish 1 What is a Village Design Statement? A Village Design Statement (VDS) highlights the qualities, style, building materials, characteristics and landscape setting of a parish, which are valued by its residents. The background, advice and guidelines given herein should be taken into account by developers, builders and residents before considering development. The development policies for the Frensham Parish area are the “saved Policies” derived from Waverley Borough Council’s Local Plan 2002, (which has now been superseded. It is proposed that the Frensham VDS should be Supplementary Planning Guidance, related to Saved Policy D4 ‘Design and Layout’. Over recent years the Parish Council Planning Committee, seeing very many applications relating to our special area, came to the conclusion that our area has individual and special aspirations that we wish to see incorporated into the planning system. Hopefully this will make the Parish’s aspirations clearer to those submitting applications to the Borough Council and give clear policy guidance. This document cannot be exhaustive but we hope that we have included sufficient detail to indicate what we would like to conserve in our village, and how we would like to see it develop. This VDS is a ‘snapshot’ reflecting the Parish’s views and situation in2008, and may need to be reviewed in the future in line with changing local needs, and new Waverley, regional and national plans and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Collaboration in Surrey
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL COUNCIL 23 FEBRUARY 2021 Title: Local Government Collaboration in Surrey Portfolio Holder: Cllr J Ward, Leader Senior Officer: T Horwood, Chief Executive Key decision: No Access: Public 1. Purpose and summary 1.1 The purpose of this report is to update the Council on progress on local government collaboration since the Council and Executive discussions of 22 July and 8 September 2020 respectively, and to allow Council to debate opportunities for future collaboration among local authorities in the light of the KPMG report, and this report. 2. Recommendation The Executive has: 1. Noted the KPMG report on future opportunities for local government in Surrey; 2. Endorsed the development of an initial options appraisal for collaboration with Guildford Borough Council; and 3. Allocated the remaining £15,000 budget previously approved for “a unitary council proposal” to “exploring collaboration opportunities with other councils”. The Executive recommend to the Council that it debate opportunities for future collaboration among local authorities in the light of the KPMG report and this report. 3. Reason for the recommendation 3.1 This report updates councillors and the public on the progress made in the discussions on local government reorganisation and collaboration in Surrey. 3.2 At Executive meetings in 2020, £30,000 was allocated “to support preparatory work for a unitary council proposal”. It is now recommended to allocate the remaining £15,000 to support the development of proposals for council collaboration, to be reported back to the Executive in due course. 4. Background context 4.1 A detailed update was provided to the Executive at its meeting on 8 September 2020,1 and is summarised as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Crosswater Lane, Churt, Farnham, Surrey, GU10
    SERVICES Mains gas, electricity and water. LOCAL AUTHORITY Waverley Borough Council, Godalming DISCLAIMER Winkworth Estate Agents wish to inform any prospective purchaser that these sales particulars were prepared in good faith and should be used as a general guide only. We have not carried out a detailed survey, nor tested any services, appliances or fittings. The measurements are approximate, rounded and are taken between internal walls often incorporating cupboards and alcoves. They should not be relied upon when purchasing fittings including carpets, curtains or appliances. Curtains/blinds, carpets and appliances whether fitted or not are deemed removable by the vendor unless they are specifically mentioned within these sales particulars Crosswater Lane, Churt, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 Guide Price £850,000 A charming attached period cottage in need of some renovation set in this stunning position next to Frensham Common, within grounds of approximately 1 acre. EPC rating (E) Tel 01252 733042 Email [email protected] Tel 01252 733042 99 West Street, Farnham, GU9 7EN Email [email protected] 99 West Street, Farnham, GU9 7EN Independent proprietor: Tarrant & Robertson Limited trading as Winkworth ACCOMMODATION Drawing Room, Dining Room, Kitchen, Study, Boiler/Utility Room, Bedroom with ensuite, Three further Bedrooms and Family Bathroom, Garden DESCRIPTION A delightful four bedroom attached period cottage constructed of brick and stone under a clay tile roof with parts dating back 400 years. The cottage is full of charm and plenty of character features, and is set within its own stunning grounds with a stream in a desirable location in Churt. Crosswater Farm has recently had a portion of the property sectioned off to form a separate property that is not included in the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Frensham Great Pond and Common Site Amenities Upgrade Project Pdf 976 Kb
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL EXECUTIVE - 01 MARCH 2016 Title: FRENSHAM GREAT POND & COMMON SITE AMENITIES UPGRADE PROJECT [Portfolio Holder: Cllr Simon Thornton] [Wards Affected: Frensham, Dockenfield and Tilford] Note pursuant to Section 100B(5) of the Local Government Act 1972 An annexe to this report contains exempt information by virtue of which the public is likely to be excluded during the item to which the report relates, as specified in Paragraph 3 of Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, namely:- Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information). Summary and purpose: The purpose of this report is to provide the Executive with an update on progress in delivering the Frensham Great Pond and Common amenities upgrade project and to seek various approvals to progress the project further. How this report relates to the Council’s Corporate Priorities: Customer Service Through a proposed revision to car park management on site, there will be improved customer service delivery from the Council’s ranger team, who will be able to spend more time managing the site and the visitors rather than taking car parking income. Environment The project supports the Environment, by protecting the Frensham Common and Pond SSSI through the careful planning and designing of the scheme and ensuring this development is sensitive to the planning constraints of the local area. The proposed area for the new building and reconfigured carpark is just outside the SSSI area. The building will aspire to be as close to zero carbon as possible, with the use of sustainable materials throughout as well as minimum energy requirement during its operation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cranleigh Railway Line
    Reinstating Rail and River Routes from Guildford - The Cranleigh Railway Line This article relates to a planning application WA/2020/0004 dated 02 January 2020 and placed before Waverley Borough Council by the Wey and Arun Canal Trust. It concerns the conflicts of interest that arise between various organisations; together with a wider question about transport infrastructure and connectivity at both local and national levels Our colleagues at Gru- Guildford Railway Users Group recently alerted us that a Waverley Council decision is still pending for the planning application to which both Gru, The Guildford Society and others have objected. Since the application date, various transport reports and government announcements have also been made which we feel have a bearing on this decision. Opened In 1816, The Wey & Arun Junction Canal linked the Wey Navigation near Guildford to the south coast via the Arun Navigation. It was intended to provide a safe, efficient route from the River Thames and London to Portsmouth to carry goods supplying the naval dockyards. However, the arrival of the railways led to its demise and by 1871 it was formally closed and over the passing years the canal fell into a state of disrepair and non-use. WACT is gradually trying to reinstate the canal that used to connect these two navigable rivers between the Thames and the South Coast and have had loyal support and much success in restoring many miles of waterway for use by leisure craft. However, a number of canal sections remain to be joined up and the WACT have various projects towards this aim.
    [Show full text]
  • Haslemere Information Statement
    HASLEMERE NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN INFORMATION STATEMENT REFERENDUM TO BE HELD ON th Thursday 7 October 2021 1 The Referendum A Neighbourhood Planning Referendum relating to the adoption of the Haslemere Neighbourhood Development Plan 2013-2032 will be held on Thursday 7th October 2021. The question that will be asked in the Referendum will be: “Do you want Waverley Borough Council to use the Neighbourhood Plan for Haslemere to help it decide planning applications in the neighbourhood area”? The Referendum area is identical to the Haslemere Neighbourhood Plan area – that is the Haslemere Town Council area. A map of the area is set out below Figure 1: Haslemere Neighbourhood Plan area and Referendum area A person is entitled to vote in the Referendum if on 7th October 2021: • He or she is entitled to vote in a local government election in the Referendum area; and • His or her qualifying address for the election is in the Referendum area. A person’s qualifying address is, in relation to a person registered in the register of electors, the address in respect of which he or she is entitled to be registered. 2 The Referendum expenses limit that will apply in relation to the Referendum is £3,131.78. The number of persons entitled to vote in the Referendum by reference to which the limit has been calculated is 13,047. The Referendum will be conducted in accordance with procedures which are similar to those used at local government elections. Information for voters What is Neighbourhood Planning? Neighbourhood planning aims to help local communities play a direct role in planning the areas in which they live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Appendix O
    APPENDIX O WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL ENVIRONMENT AND LEISURE OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 12 JANUARY 2010 EXECUTIVE - 2 FEBRUARY 2010 Title: REVIEW OF GUILDFORD-CRANLEIGH RAIL LINK REOPENING [Portfolio Holder: Cllr Richard Gates] [Wards Affected: All] Summary and purpose: On 8 September 2009, ELOS agreed the scope of a review of the Guildford- Cranleigh Rail Link reopening. The body of this report on the review into the feasibility and impact of the Association of Train Operating Companies’ (ATOC) proposal to construct 7 miles of electrified track from Cranleigh to Peasmarsh Junction was considered by ELOS at its meeting on 12 tJanuary 2010 and its recommendation to the Executive is detailed at the end of the report. How this report relates to the Council’s Corporate Priorities: The improvement of sustainable forms of transport is an important factor in making Waverley a good place to live and contributes to the Council’s priorities of Improving Lives and the Environment of the Borough. Equality and Diversity Implications: Improving public transport can increase the accessibility of parts of the borough to people with mobility problems and those without cars. Resource/Value for Money implications: There are no direct resource implications associated with this report other than the officer time involved in the review. There would be significant resource implications if Members decide to commission or contribute towards a feasibility study or funding for the Rail Link. However, the Council does not have a budget which could be used. Legal Implications: There are no direct legal implications. Introduction 1. At its meeting on the 8 September 2009, the Committee agreed the terms of reference for its in-depth review of the Guildford-Cranleigh Rail Link reopening.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexe 2 Cultural Strategy , Item 34/16
    ANNEXE 2 Waverley Borough Council Cultural Strategy - Phase 2 Report Janet Mein and The Audience Agency - Adrienne Pye Foreword Executive summary 1 The Case for Culture Arts and culture enrich our lives. They fire our imaginations, challenge, inspire, educate and entertain us. Everyone should be able to visit or experience a high-quality museum, library or live performance or participate in a cultural activity. These experiences open us to reflection, engender debate and critical thinking, and deepen our understanding of the world. (Arts Council England.) There are two dimensions to culture - production and consumption - and we all engage in one way or another across the year - attending performances and events, visiting heritage sites and exhibitions or engaged in personal home based creativity. The Creative Economy [2013] accounts for some 2.62M jobs, or one in twelve of UK employment and the GVA of the Creative Industries was £76.9bn and accounted for 5.0 per cent of the UK Economy. In Waverley the Cultural and creative economy is embedded with the University of the Creative Arts in Farnham and venues and museums in all the major settlements. Appendix 1 In Waverley, every week, hundreds of people take part in a myriad of cultural activities, coming together to be creative and share knowledge and experience. This local creative activity is embedded in our towns and villages. The social networks that result from this activity are part of the 'glue' that holds us together and makes our communities vital and also engenders a sense of wellbeing in participants. 2 Culture in Communities As part of the stakeholder consultation the views of the Town Councils' and a representative village were sought.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 August 2021
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL BOROUGH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICE List of Planning Applications received up to 09/08/2021 Copies of Planning Applications are available for inspection on our website www.waverley.gov.uk/planning. Comments should be submitted via the website or in writing within 21 days of the issue date above. Registerable Applications: Application No. & Proposed Applicant Agent Date Registered Development WA/2021/01868 Erection of detached 2 STROUD LODGE double car port GRAYSWOOD ROAD 2021-08-05 (revision of HASLEMERE WA/2020/1368). GU27 2DJ P: Witley CP 2 STROUD LODGE GRAYSWOOD ROAD HASLEMERE W: Elstead and GU27 2DJ Thursley Wanda Jarnecki 30/08/2021 WA/2021/01856 Approval of Reserved COLES YARD BARN WEST SUITE Matters (Appearance, NORTH LANE COLES YARD BARN 2021-08-03 Landscaping, Layout WATERLOOVILLE NORTH LANE and Scale following PO8 0RN WATERLOOVILLE P: Alfold CP Outline Permission PO8 0RN granted under WA/2019/0745 for the erection of up to 80 W: Alfold, Cranleigh dwellings (including 24 Rural and Ellens Green affordable) with Ward associated landscaping, open space and SUDs. LAND CENTRED COORDINATES 504068 134671 EAST OF LOXWOOD ROAD, ALFOLD Ruth Dovey 30/08/2021 WA/2021/01852 Erection of single KEEPERS COTTAGE 6 LUTENER ROAD storey rear extension EASTSHAW LANE EASEBOURNE 2021-08-02 and detached garage WOOLBEDING GU29 9AT (follows invalid GU29 0PZ P: Haslemere CP application WA/2020/0761). 23 JUNCTION PLACE W: Haslemere HASLEMERE Critchmere and GU27 1LE Shottermill Ward Jackie Hammick 30/08/2021 WA/2021/01871 Certificate of 4 LEITH WAY 4 LEITH WAY Lawfulness under CRANLEIGH CRANLEIGH 2021-08-05 Section 192 for erection GU6 8GH GU6 8GH of a gazebo and P: Cranleigh CP associated landscaping.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Funding Statement
    Waverley Borough Council Annual Infrastructure Funding Statement For Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 Reporting Period: 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2020 1 Contents Introduction and Background ................................................................................................ 3 Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Matters ........................................................................ 4 Section 106 Matters .............................................................................................................. 6 Delivery and Provision of Infrastructure in the Reported Year ............................................. 12 Education ..................................................................................................................... 12 Highways ..................................................................................................................... 12 Flood Alleviation........................................................................................................... 13 Utilities ......................................................................................................................... 13 Environmental Improvements....................................................................................... 14 Future Developer Contributions .......................................................................................... 15 CIL Projected Income .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waverley Borough Council Community Overview
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL COMMUNITY OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY 25 MARCH 2020 Title: Leisure Centre Investments update Portfolio Holder: Cllr D Beaman, Portfolio Holder for Health & Wellbeing Head of Service: Kelvin Mills, Head of Commercial Services Key decision: Yes Access: Public 1. Purpose and summary 1.1 In July 2018 Council approved a capital scheme to extend and expand the facilities at Farnham and Godalming leisure centres. Council also approved to commit to a multi- million pound investment in leisure facilities in Cranleigh and agree that officers begin a detailed consultation, with the support of external consultants, to identify a potential location for the Cranleigh Leisure Centre and report back to Executive. 1.2 This report provides an update on the three leisure investment projects. 2. Farnham Leisure Centre Background 2.1 In July 2018 Council approved a capital budget of £1.5M to progress with the more detailed specification and procurement of the Farnham Leisure Centre scheme. 2.2 The proposal included an extension to incorporate a children’s soft play and climbing facility, with the addition of a larger café area. It involved the relocation of the current offices. Project status 2.3 Following approval the project proposals have been further explored. Unfortunately the specialist operator of the climbing facility, which formed part of the conceptual plan, has subsequently approved installations in Alton and Fleet and has therefore confirmed that such a facility at Farnham is not now available to the Council. 2.4 Consequently officers have re-negotiated with Places Leisure and explored other service opportunities, to deliver improved revenue position.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Street Parking Places Order
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL THE WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL (OFF-STREET PARKING PLACES) ORDER 2020 Council Offices, The Burys, Godalming, Surrey. GU7 1HR The Council of the Borough of Waverley (hereinafter called "the Council") in exercise of its powers under Sections 32, 33, 35, 35A(1) and 124 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (hereinafter called "the Act of 1984") and Parts III and IV of Schedule 9 to the Act of 1984 and the Road Traffic Act 1991 (hereinafter called the 1991 Act) each as amended by the Road Traffic (Permitted Parking Area and Special Parking Area) (County of Surrey) (Borough of Waverley) Order 2007 and the Traffic Management Act 2004 (hereinafter called the 2004 Act) and of all other enabling powers and with the consent of the County Council of Surrey given under Section 39(3) of the Act of 1984 and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of Schedule 9 of the Act of 1984 hereby makes the following Order. PART I GENERAL Article No. 1. Commencement and Citation This Order shall come into operation on 20 November 2020 and may be cited as the “Waverley Borough Council (Off-Street Parking Places) Order 2020”. 2. Interpretation (1) Any reference in this Order to a numbered Article is a reference to the Article bearing that number in this Order and any reference in this Order to "the Schedule" is a reference to the Schedule to this Order. (2) In this Order except where the context otherwise requires the following expressions have the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them:- “Charging Days” means those days other than Christmas Day which are specified in relation to each parking place in the Schedule; “Charging Hours" means any period specified in the Schedule to this Order in respect of which a charge is specified in Article 12, except in respect of the hours relating to Off- peak Parking Permits ; “Civil Enforcement Officer” means a person authorised by or on behalf of the Council to patrol and issue penalty charge notices in any parking place.
    [Show full text]