Phylum Mesozoa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

“Mesozoa” larvae are parasitic in the body spaces of molluscs and 100 species polychaete worms, brittle stars and other invertebrates small, worm-like parasites of marine invertebrates the larvae reproduce asexually by fragmentation once considered the “missing link” between protozoa and animals the larva causes destruction of the hosts gonads unclear if they are degenerate flatworms or truly at some point sexual reproduction is triggered and the primitive animals larval parasites becomes male or female recent molecular analysis shows that this group should the males are smaller than the females be classified into two separate phyla the males and females leave the host and mate small wormlike animals (.5-.7MM) each egg developes into a ciliated larva that makes its most are parasitic; others are free-living way to another host made of only 20-30 cells arranged in 2 layers Subphylum Rhombozoa but no true tissues or organs one group is commensal in kidneys of squid, octopi, and cuttlefish ciliated “epidermis” each species of cephalopod has its own species of only structures resembling organs are gonads mesozoan have complex, but poorly understood life cycle only a few millimeters long with 20-30 cells Subphylum Orthonectida long central reproductive cell (axial cell) Animals: Mesozoa; Ziser Lecture Notes 2016.9 1 Animals: Mesozoa; Ziser Lecture Notes 2016.9 2 the axial cell can develop asexually into wormlike juveniles or it may produce eggs and sperm that self-fertilize to produce a top-shaped, ciliated larva that leaves the host and finds a new host typically it will reproduce asexually until the hosts kidneys get too crowded then it will reproduce sexually there are 3 genera in this group Evolutionary Relationships controversial, some possibilities: 1. very primitive metazoans may be evolutionary intermediates between protozoa and metazoa but from a different stock than choanoflagellates that are thought to have given rise to animals 2. share ancestry with platyhelminthes degenerate flatworms due to parasitic lifestyle endoderm may be mesoderm derived DNA analysis supports this idea Animals: Mesozoa; Ziser Lecture Notes 2016.9 3 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Systema Naturae∗
Systema Naturae∗ c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.802 (June 29, 2008) 7 Regnum Monera [ Bacillus ] /Bacteria Subregnum Bacteria [ 6:8Bacillus ]1 Superphylum Posibacteria [ 6:2Bacillus ] stat.m. Phylum 1. Firmicutes [ 6Bacillus ]2 Classis 1(1). Thermotogae [ 5Thermotoga ] i.s. 2(2). Mollicutes [ 5Mycoplasma ] 3(3). Clostridia [ 5Clostridium ]3 4(4). Bacilli [ 5Bacillus ] 5(5). Symbiobacteres [ 5Symbiobacterium ] Phylum 2. Actinobacteria [ 6Actynomyces ] Classis 1(6). Actinobacteres [ 5Actinomyces ] Phylum 3. Hadobacteria [ 6Deinococcus ] sed.m. Classis 1(7). Hadobacteres [ 5Deinococcus ]4 Superphylum Negibacteria [ 6:2Rhodospirillum ] stat.m. Phylum 4. Chlorobacteria [ 6Chloroflexus ]5 Classis 1(8). Ktedonobacteres [ 5Ktedonobacter ] sed.m. 2(9). Thermomicrobia [ 5Thermomicrobium ] 3(10). Chloroflexi [ 5Chloroflexus ] ∗Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations and signs: sed.m. (sedis mutabilis); stat.m. (status mutabilis): s., aut i. (superior, aut interior); i.s. (incertae sedis); sed.p. (sedis possibilis); s.str. (sensu stricto); s.l. (sensu lato); incl. (inclusum); excl. (exclusum); \quotes" for environmental groups; * (asterisk) for paraphyletic taxa; / (slash) at margins for major clades (\domains"). 1Incl. \Nanobacteria" i.s. et dubitativa, \OP11 group" i.s. 2Incl. \TM7" i.s., \OP9", \OP10". 3Incl. Dictyoglomi sed.m., Fusobacteria, Thermolithobacteria. 4= Deinococcus{Thermus. 5Incl. Thermobaculum i.s. 1 4(11). Dehalococcoidetes [ 5Dehalococcoides ] 5(12). Anaerolineae [ 5Anaerolinea ]6 Phylum 5. Cyanobacteria [ 6Nostoc ] Classis 1(13). Gloeobacteres [ 5Gloeobacter ] 2(14). Chroobacteres [ 5Chroococcus ]7 3(15). Hormogoneae [ 5Nostoc ] Phylum 6. Bacteroidobacteria [ 6Bacteroides ]8 Classis 1(16). Fibrobacteres [ 5Fibrobacter ] 2(17). Chlorobi [ 5Chlorobium ] 3(18). Salinibacteres [ 5Salinibacter ] 4(19). Bacteroidetes [ 5Bacteroides ]9 Phylum 7. Spirobacteria [ 6Spirochaeta ] Classis 1(20). Spirochaetes [ 5Spirochaeta ] s.l.10 Phylum 8. Planctobacteria [ 6Planctomyces ]11 Classis 1(21).
[Show full text]
New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to reﬂ ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD deﬁ nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
[Show full text]
Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
[Show full text]
Download the Abstract Book
1 Exploring the male-induced female reproduction of Schistosoma mansoni in a novel medium Jipeng Wang1, Rui Chen1, James Collins1 1) UT Southwestern Medical Center. Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease caused by schistosome parasites that infect over 200 million people. The prodigious egg output of these parasites is the sole driver of pathology due to infection. Female schistosomes rely on continuous pairing with male worms to fuel the maturation of their reproductive organs, yet our understanding of their sexual reproduction is limited because egg production is not sustained for more than a few days in vitro. Here, we explore the process of male-stimulated female maturation in our newly developed ABC169 medium and demonstrate that physical contact with a male worm, and not insemination, is sufficient to induce female development and the production of viable parthenogenetic haploid embryos. By performing an RNAi screen for genes whose expression was enriched in the female reproductive organs, we identify a single nuclear hormone receptor that is required for differentiation and maturation of germ line stem cells in female gonad. Furthermore, we screen genes in non-reproductive tissues that maybe involved in mediating cell signaling during the male-female interplay and identify a transcription factor gli1 whose knockdown prevents male worms from inducing the female sexual maturation while having no effect on male:female pairing. Using RNA-seq, we characterize the gene expression changes of male worms after gli1 knockdown as well as the female transcriptomic changes after pairing with gli1-knockdown males. We are currently exploring the downstream genes of this transcription factor that may mediate the male stimulus associated with pairing.
[Show full text]
Metabarcoding in the Abyss: Uncovering Deep-Sea Biodiversity Through Environmental
Metabarcoding in the abyss : uncovering deep-sea biodiversity through environmental DNA Miriam Isabelle Brandt To cite this version: Miriam Isabelle Brandt. Metabarcoding in the abyss : uncovering deep-sea biodiversity through environmental DNA. Agricultural sciences. Université Montpellier, 2020. English. NNT : 2020MONTG033. tel-03197842 HAL Id: tel-03197842 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03197842 Submitted on 14 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE M ONTPELLIER En Sciences de l'Évolution et de la Biodiversité École doctorale GAIA Unité mixte de recherche MARBEC Pourquoi Pas les Abysses ? L’ADN environnemental pour l’étude de la biodiversité des grands fonds marins Metabarcoding in the abyss: uncovering deep - sea biodiversity through environmental DNA Présentée par Miriam Isabelle BRANDT Le 10 juillet 2020 Sous la direction de Sophie ARNAUD-HAOND et Daniela ZEPPILLI Devant le jury composé de Sofie DERYCKE, Senior researcher/Professeur rang A, ILVO, Belgique Rapporteur
[Show full text]
Metazoa Based on How Organized They Are
BIOLOGY 18: Phyla of the “Changed Animals” Climbing the evolutionary lad- der from the protozoa we find higher levels of organization. Organisms are grouped into mesozoa and metazoa based on how organized they are. The simplest multicellular organisms (those having many cells) are the me- sozoa (“middle animals”). These or- ganisms are simple parasitic worms. Parasitic means that they live at the expense of some other organism. They often suck nutrient-rich fluids right out of the other organism, but they don’t usually kill the organism or they lose their source of food. The metazoa, meaning “changed animals” can be larger in size because they have different kinds of cells that work together to bring things in, take things out, protect the whole organ- ism, and perform other duties that enable them to live in a wider range of habitats. Because of the various cell types, organisms at this level be- gin taking on a variety of shapes that are not possible among colonies of identical cells. The metazoa include all other phyla of animals from the simple to the complex. A strawberry sponge of the phylum Porifera. Kingdom Animalia: Metazoa Kingdom Porifera Coelenterata Ctenophora Platyhelminthes Rhinochocoela Nematoda Acanthocephala Chaetognatha Nematomorpha Hemichordata (sponges) (flat worms) (proboscis, (round (spiny-headed (arrow (horsehair (acorn worms) nemertine & worms) worms) worms) worms) Phylum ribbon worms) 186 BIOLOGY The next set of organisms in terms of their simplicity is the phylum Porifera—the sponges. There are many types of these animals that live in the sea and a few that live in fresh water.
[Show full text]
Evidence That Nuclear Receptors Evolved from Terpene Synthases
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.29.450438; this version posted July 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Evidence that nuclear receptors evolved from terpene synthases Douglas R. Houstona, Jane G. Hannaa,e, J. Constance Lathea,f, Stephen G. Hillierc,1, and Richard Lathed,1 aInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry, and Biotechnology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; bProgram in Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; cMedical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; dDivision of Infection Medicine, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK; ePresent address: Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Cairo Campus, Cairo, Egypt; fPresent address: Ashfield MedComms, Glasgow, UK 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.29.450438; this version posted July 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Ligand-activated nuclear receptors (NRs) including steroid receptors orchestrate development, growth, and reproduction across all animal lifeforms – the Metazoa – but how NRs evolved remains mysterious. Given the universality of terpenoids – including steroids and retinoids – as activating NR ligands, we asked if NRs might have evolved from enzymes that catalyze terpene synthesis and metabolism. We provide evidence suggesting that NRs are a sub-branch of the terpene synthase (TS) enzyme superfamily.
[Show full text]
A Tale of Two Biodiversity Levels Inferred from DNA Barcoding Of
UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI A TALE OF TWO BIODIVERSITY LEVELS INFERRED FROM DNA BARCODING OF SELECTED NORTH ATLANTIC CRUSTACEANS DISSERTATION PRESENTED AS PARTIAL REQUIREMENT OF THE DOCTORATE OF BIOLOGY EXTENDED FROM UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL BY ADRIANA E. RADULOVICI MARCH 2012 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de cette thèse se fait dans le rèspect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522- Rév.01-2006). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d'utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l'auteur] autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l'lnternE?t. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l'auteur] à [ses] droits moraux ni à [ses] droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l'auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI L'HISTOIRE DE DEUX NIVEAUX DE BIODIVERSITÉ DEMONTRÉE PAR LE CODE-BARRE D'ADN CHEZ LES CRUSTACÉS DE L'ATLANTIQUE DU NORD THÉ SE PRÉSENTÉE COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DU DOCTORAT EN BIOLOGIE EXTENSIONNÉ DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL PAR ADRIANA E.
[Show full text]
Downloaded Genomic (I
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/282285; this version posted March 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The mitochondrial genomes of the mesozoans Intoshia linei, Dicyema sp., and Dicyema japonicum Helen. E. Robertson1, Philipp. H. Schiffer1 and Maximilian. J. Telford1* 1 Centre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT *Author for correspondence: [email protected] +44 (0)20 7679 2554 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/282285; this version posted March 14, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The Dicyemida and Orthonectida are two groups of tiny, simple, vermiform parasites that have historically been united in a group named the Mesozoa. Both Dicyemida and Orthonectida have just two cell layers and appear to lack any defined tissues. They were initially thought to be evolutionary intermediates between protozoans and metazoans but more recent analyses indicate that they are protostomian metazoans that have undergone secondary simplification from a complex ancestor. Here we describe the first almost complete mitochondrial genome sequence from an orthonectid, Intoshia linei, and describe nine and eight mitochondrial protein-coding genes from Dicyema sp. and Dicyema japonicum, respectively. The 14,247 base pair long I. linei sequence has typical metazoan gene content, but is exceptionally AT-rich, and has a divergent gene order compared to other metazoans.
[Show full text]
The Genera of the Phylum Orthonectida
Cah. Biol. Mar. (1992),33 : 377-406 Roscoff The genera of the phylum Orthonectida. E.N. Kozloff Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington Friday Harbor, Washington, 98250, USA Résumé: Sept espèces d'orthonectides ont été étudiées par techniques d'imprégnation argentique, qui montrent avec précision l'arrangement des cellules épidermiques et leurs cils. Ces caractéristiques, et la dispoSition des sper matozoïdes et des ovocytes, sont à la base des distinctions entre les quatre genres, dont les espèces types sont Rhopalura ophiocomae, /ntoshia linei, CilioCÎncta sabellariae, et Stoecharthrwll giardi. Également, Rhopalura granosa, /ntoshia leptoplanae, et Ciliocùlcta julini sont classées définitivement, et quelques autres, parmi les 18 espèces décrites depuis 1877, peuvent être classées provisoirement. Une liste des hôtes d'orthonectides ni décrits ni identifiés est assemblée. Abstract : Seven species of orthonectids have been studied with the aid of techniques of sil ver impregnation, which demonstrate the arrangement of epidemlal cells and the pattern of ciliation. The four recognized genera, who se type species are Rhopalura ophiocomae, /Ilfoshia linei, Ciliocincta sabellariae, and Stoecharthrul11 giardi, are distinguished on the basis of these features and the disposition of sperm and oocytes. RllOpalura granosa, /ntoshia leptoplanae, and Ci/ocineta juLini are also assigned definitively to genus. A few other species, among the 18 that have been named since 1877, are classified tentatively. Hosts for orthonectids that have not been described or identified are listed. INTRODUCTION The first orthonectid to be given a name was Rhopalura ophiocomae Giard (1877), a parasite of the ophiuroid Amphipholis squamata (= Ophiocoma neglecta) at Wimereux, France. In the same paper, Giard proposed names for two other species.
[Show full text]
Systema Naturae. the Classification of Living Organisms
Systema Naturae. The classification of living organisms. c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.601 (June 26, 2007) Preface Most of researches agree that kingdom-level classification of living things needs the special rules and principles. Two approaches are possible: (a) tree- based, Hennigian approach will look for main dichotomies inside so-called “Tree of Life”; and (b) space-based, Linnaean approach will look for the key differences inside “Natural System” multidimensional “cloud”. Despite of clear advantages of tree-like approach (easy to develop rules and algorithms; trees are self-explaining), in many cases the space-based approach is still prefer- able, because it let us to summarize any kinds of taxonomically related da- ta and to compare different classifications quite easily. This approach also lead us to four-kingdom classification, but with different groups: Monera, Protista, Vegetabilia and Animalia, which represent different steps of in- creased complexity of living things, from simple prokaryotic cell to compound Nature Precedings : doi:10.1038/npre.2007.241.2 Posted 16 Aug 2007 eukaryotic cell and further to tissue/organ cell systems. The classification Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations: incertae sedis (i.s.); pro parte (p.p.); sensu lato (s.l.); sedis mutabilis (sed.m.); sedis possi- bilis (sed.poss.); sensu stricto (s.str.); status mutabilis (stat.m.); quotes for “environmental” groups; asterisk for paraphyletic* taxa. 1 Regnum Monera Superphylum Archebacteria Phylum 1. Archebacteria Classis 1(1). Euryarcheota 1 2(2). Nanoarchaeota 3(3). Crenarchaeota 2 Superphylum Bacteria 3 Phylum 2. Firmicutes 4 Classis 1(4). Thermotogae sed.m. 2(5).
[Show full text]
Introduction to the Bilateria and the Phylum Xenacoelomorpha Triploblasty and Bilateral Symmetry Provide New Avenues for Animal Radiation
CHAPTER 9 Introduction to the Bilateria and the Phylum Xenacoelomorpha Triploblasty and Bilateral Symmetry Provide New Avenues for Animal Radiation long the evolutionary path from prokaryotes to modern animals, three key innovations led to greatly expanded biological diversification: (1) the evolution of the eukaryote condition, (2) the emergence of the A Metazoa, and (3) the evolution of a third germ layer (triploblasty) and, perhaps simultaneously, bilateral symmetry. We have already discussed the origins of the Eukaryota and the Metazoa, in Chapters 1 and 6, and elsewhere. The invention of a third (middle) germ layer, the true mesoderm, and evolution of a bilateral body plan, opened up vast new avenues for evolutionary expan- sion among animals. We discussed the embryological nature of true mesoderm in Chapter 5, where we learned that the evolution of this inner body layer fa- cilitated greater specialization in tissue formation, including highly specialized organ systems and condensed nervous systems (e.g., central nervous systems). In addition to derivatives of ectoderm (skin and nervous system) and endoderm (gut and its de- Classification of The Animal rivatives), triploblastic animals have mesoder- Kingdom (Metazoa) mal derivatives—which include musculature, the circulatory system, the excretory system, Non-Bilateria* Lophophorata and the somatic portions of the gonads. Bilater- (a.k.a. the diploblasts) PHYLUM PHORONIDA al symmetry gives these animals two axes of po- PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM BRYOZOA larity (anteroposterior and dorsoventral) along PHYLUM PLACOZOA PHYLUM BRACHIOPODA a single body plane that divides the body into PHYLUM CNIDARIA ECDYSOZOA two symmetrically opposed parts—the left and PHYLUM CTENOPHORA Nematoida PHYLUM NEMATODA right sides.
[Show full text]