DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 BDC Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 BDC Annual Report 2015 Boise Interagency Dispatch Center Area of Responsibility 2 Dispatch 3 Fire Suppression Resources 5 Fire Activity Historical Comparisons 6 Fire Activity Statistics by Agency 7 Fire Activity Boise District BLM 10 Fire Activity Boise National Forest 11 Fire Activity Idaho Department of Lands Southwest 12 Fire Activity Significant Acreage 13 Logistical Activity 15 Local Resources Activity - Crews 16 Local Resources Activity – Engines 18 Local Resources Activity – Aircraft 19 Local Resources Activity – SEAT Base 21 Local Resources Activity – Tanker Base 24 Fuels Management 26 Boise BLM Mitigation. Prevention. Investigation 28 Boise National Forest Prevention 30 Idaho Department of Lands Summary 35 Mobilization Center 37 Fire Danger Rating Areas and Map 38 Remote Automated Weather Stations 39 Fire Danger Rating Seasonal Outputs 40 Weather Summary 43 Seasonal Weather and Severity – SNOTEL Information 44 Lightning Summary 47 Fuel Moisture 48 Fuel Moisture Charts 51 1 AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY The Boise Interagency Dispatch Center continued its interagency success in providing safe, cost effective service for wildland fires within southwest Idaho for Boise District Bureau of Land Management, Boise National Forest, and Southwest Idaho Department of Lands. Listed below is the total acreage responsibility of Boise Interagency Dispatch Center and each agency’s ownership and protection areas. SOUTHWEST IDAHO BOISE DISTRICT BLM BOISE NATIONAL FOREST DEPARTMENT OF LANDS OWNERSHIP ACRES 3,826,577 2,085,836 501,394 PROTECTION ACRES 6,603,159 2,124,851 393,058 BOISE DISPATCH PROTECTION RESPONSIBILITY ACRES 9,121,068 OWNERSHIP ACRES BY PROTECTION AREA BOISE DISTRICT BLM BOISE NATIONAL FOREST SW IDAHO DEPT OF LANDS BLM 3,790,694 16,540 19,343 BOR 34,598 46,905 1,386 DOI 11 0 0 HISTORIC WATER 23,461 5,375 722 MILITARY 10,311 805 104 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 1,392 0 0 PRIVATE 2,215,556 138,903 193,122 STATE 418,928 46,694 35,771 STATE FISH & GAME 18,802 5,596 432 STATE OTHER 4,094 0 0 STATE PARKS & REC 5,687 0 0 USFS 79,626 1,864,032 142,179 2 Jill Leguineche DISPATCH PERSONNEL Center Manager GS-11 PFT (FS) Vacant Cathy Baird Assistant Center Manager-Intel Assistant Center Manager-Logistics GS-9 PFT (BLM) GS-9 PFT (FS) Carol Field Nicole Oke Lead Dispatcher Lead Dispatcher GS-7 PFT (FS) GS-7 PFT(FS) Mark Rich Alan Mebane IA Dispatcher Lead Dispatcher GS-7 PFT (FS) GS-5/6/7 1039 (BLM) Casey Moore Ashley Zimmerman Lead Dispatcher GS-7 PFT (FS) IA Dispatcher GS-5/6/7 1039 (FS) Ed Harper IA Dispatcher Andra Peterson GS-5/6/7 IA Dispatcher 1039 (BLM) GS-5/6/7 1039 (BLM) Mardi Hart Job Corp Student IA Dispatcher Office Assistant GS-7 PSE (BLM) The Boise Dispatch Center is normally operated with thirteen personnel: one center manager, two assistant center managers, nine initial attack dispatchers, and one office assistant. The center manager position serves as the primary floor supervisor and liaison with the duty officers with the assistant center managers being secondary as needed. The primary duties of the Assistant Center Mangers are Logistics and Intelligence. Cathy Baird serves in the Logistics role and the Intelligence role was vacant this year. Of the nine primary IA dispatchers, two are also assigned as aviation dispatchers and one as night dispatcher. Each dispatcher also has an area of responsibility which could include Bureau of Land Management, southern Boise National Forest, northern Boise National Forest or Southwest Idaho Forest Protective District. There were several personnel changes and movement this year. Kelsey Dehoney one of our IA Dispatchers took an upgrade to the Twin Falls District. We were able to fill behind her in Regional FireHire with Casey Moore from the East Idaho Dispatch office. We had 2 new seasonal dispatchers this year. Andra Peterson from the Boise BLM Helitack crew served as the second Aviation Dispatcher and Ashley Zimmerman from the Idaho City Hotshots. Ed Harper returned to dispatch from the field and worked both the BLM and the State desks. Leigh Ann Hislop took a long term detail to the Boise District training officer position in the spring and her intelligence duties were divided amongst the dispatchers for the remainder of the year. The office assistant position was filled by several Centennial Job Corp students. 3 Local fire activity as a whole was well below the ten year average. Boise District BLM was well below the average for starts and above average for acres burned. For Boise National Forest, the number of fire starts and acres were both well below the 10 year average. Southwest Idaho Department of Lands was just above average for the number of starts but acres burned was over five times the normal (reference charts on page 8). Logistically, our dispatch workload was busier than normal throughout the year as Nationally we spend a fair amount of time in Planning Level 5 and supported all of California, Oregon and Washington (refer to the charts on page 17). For operations, initial attack started with a busy May and June but a very quiet July. Activity picked up the second week of August with the Soda Fire and then it stayed fairly steady but not overwhelming the entire season. Dispatch went to the seven day coverage on May 17th and ended on October 18th. The first 24-hour coverage was May 5th. The regular night shift started on June 14th and ended on September 27th. We opened expanded dispatch on August 11th and closed October 17th. We hosted five Incident Management Teams and two Buying Team this season. Soda Fire 2015 INCIDENT IMT TYPE IMT NAME TEAM HOME UNIT SODA COMPLEX TYPE 1 PECHOTA ROCKY MTN SODA COMPLEX TYPE 2 MARTIN/WHALEN GREAT BASIN COUGAR TYPE 2 ROSENTHAL GREAT BASIN COUGAR TYPE 3 WYATT NEVADA WALKER TYPE 2 DUNFORD GREAT BASIN SODA COMPLEX BUYING TEAM SHUPLA GREAT BASIN WALKER BUYING TEAM EARLY GREAT BASIN Due to our dispatch location being in close proximity to the National Interagency Fire Center, we were honored to have numerous tours from many different offices and countries that included: Office of Aircraft Services, ROSS Phacil and Project Developers, Irwin and the Fire Reporting Group from DOI, Idaho Power Dispatchers, DOI Secretary Jewel, Austin Texas Fire Department, USDA Under Secretary and CIO’s. 4 FIRE SUPPRESSION RESOURCES Below is the list of resources that are dispatched through BDC. AGENCY BLM USFS IDL UNIT IDENTIFICATION ID-BOD ID-BOF ID-SWS AIR ATTACK PLATFORM 1 1 0 TYPE 1 HELICOPTER 0 1 0 TYPE 2 HELICOPTER 0 1 0 TYPE 3 HELICOPTER 1 1 0 HELITACK PERSONNEL 11 22 0 TYPE 1 IHC 0 2 0 TYPE 2 REGULAR IA CREW 0 2 0 TYPE 2 CREW 0 1 1 SMOKE CHASE CREW (5-10 PEOPLE) 0 1 1 SUPER HEAVY ENGINE (TYPE 3) 2 0 0 TYPE 4 ENGINE 12 5 0 TYPE 5/6/7 ENGINE 0 0 4 TYPE 5/6/7 PATROL/PREVENTION 0 8 0 WATER TENDER 3 0 0 DOZER 3 0 0 FUEL TRUCK 1 0 0 MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS TRAILER 1 0 0 MOBILE CACHE/COMMAND TRAILER 1 1 0 CONTRACT RESOURCES NATIONAL TYPE 2 IA CREW 2 REGIONAL ENGINES TYPE 4 17 REGIONAL ENGINES TYPE 6 21 AIRCRAFT CRASH RESCUE APPARTUS 1 NATIONAL BUSES – CREW CARRIER 54 REGIONAL WATER TENDERS - TACTICAL 5 REGIONAL WATER TENDERS - SUPPORT 26 CHIPPER 5 CLERICAL SUPPORT UNIT 1 DOZERS 26 EXCAVATORS 12 FALLER MODULE 8 ROAD GRADERS 5 SKIDDER 0 SKIDGINE 0 HELICOPTER OPERATIONS SUPPORT TRAILER 2 TRANSPORTS TRACTOR/TRAILER 50 MECHANICS/SERVICE TRUCK 6 REFRIGERATED TRUCK/TRAILER 11 WEED WASHING UNIT 9 FUEL TENDER 8 GRAY WATER TRUCK 12 POTABLE WATER TRUCK 4 HANDWASHING STATION – TRAILER MOUNTED 7 5 FIRE ACTIVITY Boise Interagency Dispatch Center dispatched a total of 253 incidents which includes wildland fires, assists to local cooperators, and UTL/false alarms. Within our response area we dispatched to 183 confirmed incidents for 316,963 acres. Our Southwest Idaho 10 year average (2006-2015) is 236 fires for 185,718 acres. Below is a list of 2015 fires and acres that belong to each wildland protection agency with averages and percent of averages. BOISE DISTRICT BLM BOISE NATIONAL FOREST SW IDAHO DEPT OF LANDS BDC – SW IDAHO FIRES 89 FIRES 66 FIRES 28 FIRES 183 5 YR AVG 108 5 YR AVG 98 5 YR AVG 29 5 YR AVG 234 % OF 5 YR AVG 82% % OF 5 YR AVG 67% % OF 5 YR AVG 96% % OF 5 YR AVG 78% 10 YR AVG 101 10 YR AVG 108 10 YR AVG 26 10 YR AVG 236 % OF 10 YR AVG 88% % OF 10 YR AVG 61% % OF 10 YR AVG 107% % OF 10 YR AVG 78% 25 YR AVG 102 25 YR AVG 142 25 YR AVG 26 25 YR AVG 270 % OF 25 YR AVG 87% % OF 25 YR AVG 46% % OF 25 YR AVG 107% % OF 25 YR AVG 67% ACRES 309,046 ACRES 1,600 ACRES 6,317 ACRES 316,963 5 YR AVG 159,610 5 YR AVG 61,709 5 YR AVG 3,664 5 YR AVG 224,983 % OF 5 YR AVG 193% % OF 5 YR AVG 02% % OF 5 YR AVG 172% % OF 5 YR AVG 140% 10 YR AVG 107,674 10 YR AVG 75,182 10 YR AVG 2,862 10 YR AVG 185,718 % OF 10 YR AVG 287% % OF 10 YR AVG 02% % OF 10 YR AVG 221% % OF 10 YR AVG 170% 25 YR AVG 87,180 25 YR AVG 51,282 25 YR AVG 1,407 25 YR AVG 139,869 % OF 25 YR AVG 354% % OF 25 YR AVG 03% % OF 25 YR AVG 449% % OF 25 YR AVG 227% The following table provides a 10 year comparison and average.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Post-Fire Treatment Effectiveness for Hillslope Stabilization
    United States Department of Agriculture Post-Fire Treatment Forest Service Rocky Mountain Effectiveness for Research Station General Technical Hillslope Stabilization Report RMRS-GTR-240 August 2010 Peter R. Robichaud, Louise E. Ashmun, and Bruce D. Sims A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE Robichaud, Peter R.; Ashmun, Louise E.; Sims, Bruce D. 2010. Post-fire treatment effectiveness for hill- slope stabilization. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-240. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 62 p. Abstract This synthesis of post-fire treatment effectiveness reviews the past decade of research, monitoring, and product development related to post-fire hillslope emergency stabilization treatments, including erosion barri- ers, mulching, chemical soil treatments, and combinations of these treatments. In the past ten years, erosion barrier treatments (contour-felled logs and straw wattles) have declined in use and are now rarely applied as a post-fire hillslope treatment. In contrast, dry mulch treatments (agricultural straw, wood strands, wood shreds, etc.) have quickly gained acceptance as effective, though somewhat expensive, post-fire hillslope stabilization treatments and are frequently recommended when values-at-risk warrant protection. This change has been motivated by research that shows the proportion of exposed mineral soil (or conversely, the propor- tion of ground cover) to be the primary treatment factor controlling post-fire hillslope erosion. Erosion barrier treatments provide little ground cover and have been shown to be less effective than mulch, especially during short-duration, high intensity rainfall events. In addition, innovative options for producing and applying mulch materials have adapted these materials for use on large burned areas that are inaccessible by road.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendors by Managing Organization
    Look up by Vendor, then look at managing dispatch. This dispatch center holds the virtual ownership of that vendor. When the vendor obtains their NAP user account, the vendor would then call this dispatch center for Web statusing permissions. You can run this list in ROSS reports: use the search function, type "vendors" or "managing" then search. Should show up. You can filter and sort as necessary. Managing Org Name Org Name Northwest Coordination Center 1-A Construction & Fire LLP Sacramento Headquarters Command Center 10 Tanker Air Carrier LLC Northwest Coordination Center 1A H&K Inc. Oregon Dept. of Forestry Coordination Center 1st Choice Contracting, Inc Missoula Interagency Dispatch Center 3 - Mor Enterprises, Inc. Southwest Area Coordination Center 310 Dust Control, LLC Oregon Dept. of Forestry Coordination Center 3b's Forestry, Incorporated State of Alaska Logistics Center 40-Mile Air, LTD Northern California Coordination Center 49 Creek Ranch LLC Northern California Coordination Center 49er Pressure Wash & Water Service, Inc. Helena Interagency Dispatch Center 4x4 Logging Teton Interagency Dispatch Center 5-D Trucking, LLC Northern California Coordination Center 6 Rivers Construction Inc Southwest Area Coordination Center 7W Enterprises LLC Northern California Coordination Center A & A Portables, Inc Northern California Coordination Center A & B Saw & Lawnmowers Shop Northern Rockies Coordination Center A & C Construction Northern California Coordination Center A & F Enterprises Eastern Idaho Interagency Fire Center A & F Excavation Southwest Area Forestry Dispatch A & G Acres Plus Northern California Coordination Center A & G Pumping, Inc. Northern California Coordination Center A & H Rents Inc Central Nevada Interagency Dispatch Center A & N Enterprises Northern California Coordination Center A & P Helicopters, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • WECC Wildfire Presentation July 2020
    Wildfire Events and Utility Responses in California Joseph Merrill, Emergency Response Staff July 24, 2020 Overview I. Presentation: Wildfire Events and Utility Responses in California • Major Wildfires in 2007 and 2017-2019 • Electricity System Causes and Utility Responses • Public Safety Power Shutoffs II. Reference Slides: California’s Transmission Planning Process • California Independent System Operator • California Public Utilities Commission • California Energy Commission 2 Extreme Wind-Driven Fire “In October 2007, Santa Ana winds swept across Southern California and caused dozens of wildfires. The conflagration burned 780 square miles, killed 17 people, and destroyed thousands of homes and buildings. Hundreds of thousands of people were evacuated at the height of the fires. Transportation was disrupted over a large area for several days, including many road closures. Portions of the electric power network, public communication systems, and community water sources were destroyed.” California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision 12-04-024 April 19, 2012 3 2007: Rice and Guejito/Witch Fires Destructive Fires occur in San Diego County Rice Fire (9,472 acres) • Caused by SDG&E lines not adequately distanced from vegetation • One of the most destructive CA fires of 2007, destroying 248 structures Guejito and Witch Fires (197,990 acres) • Caused by dead tree limb falling on SDG&E infrastructure and delay in de-energizing power line • Most destructive CA fire of 2007, killing 2 people and destroying 1141 homes 4 5 6 SDG&E Response
    [Show full text]
  • Now It's 'Healthy Air Living' Air District Launches New, More Aggressive Educational Effort
    Fresno Bee editorial, Tuesday, June 24, 2008: Now it's 'Healthy Air Living' Air district launches new, more aggressive educational effort. Spare the Air days have had their day. Now it's time for Healthy Air Living. The Valley air district is about to embark on a new, more aggressive effort to get residents to make the sort of lifestyle changes we must have in order to have cleaner air to breathe. The new program will kick off with Healthy Air Living Week, July 7-13. It's not that Spare the Air was a failure. That program did a great deal to create awareness of the scope and difficulty involved in cleaning the Valley's polluted air. But it was, in the words of the air district's director, "episodic" in nature, tied to the very worst air days in the region. Healthy Air Living, by contrast, will seek to promote changes in everyday behavior. It's major goals: Reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled through the Valley each day. The district will issue a challenge to Valley residents, business and other organizations to "Commute green in the San Joaquin," by encouraging the use of mass transit, car and van pools and greater reliance on bicycles, electric scooters, walking and telecommuting. Reduce emissions from equipment and other operations. Reduce emissions when air quality is poor. An example might be shifting employee schedules so more work is performed in the early morning and evening, when the air quality is better, and reducing activity when pollution peaks. Encourage more use of alternative fuels and equipment, raise energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Ponderosa Pine Scenic Byway Wildlife Viewing Guide
    PONDEROSA PINE SCENIC BYWAY WILDLIFE VIEWING GUIDE INTRODUCTION WILDLIFE VIEWING TIPS • Observe wildlife from a distance. Use binoculars he Ponderosa Pine Scenic Byway (along or a camera with zoom lens for a closer look. Highway 21 from Boise to Stanley) traverses • Use your senses of hearing, sight, & smell to spot T a variety of landscapes from foothills & high animal sign such as tracks, nests, trails, & scat. elevation forests to scenic river canyons & majestic • Wildlife watching requires patience. Move slowly & mountain peaks. The diversity of plant communities quietly. along the route provides habitat for hundreds of wildlife species including moose, black bear, elk, • Plan your visit according to the season & time of snowshoe hare, coyote, red fox, songbirds, eagles & day. Mammals are generally more active at dawn more. & dusk while birds may be observed throughout the This guide features sites where you can explore day. the region’s unique wildlife habitats & enrich your • Take photos, notes & drawings of your appreciation of nature. A variety of wild places awaits observations. you. • Use field guides to learn more Remember: Tread lightly, stay on trails, & leave what about wildlife & plants. you find. Pack out what you bring in. Be aware of • For more informationon wildlife viewing use changing road & weather conditions. Be considerate the QR Code below or visit: of other visitors & please be careful with fire. fishandgame.idaho.gov/explore Enjoy the journey! DAHO I F I E S H M & GA Nature viewing along Highway 21 from Boise to Stanley PONDEROSA SCENIC BYWAY MAP OVERVIEW PONDEROSA SCENIC BYWAY INSET LOCATION IN IDAHO LEGEND R Restrooms c Camping $ Fees ; Interpretive Trail t Trailhead * Fishing h ADA Access P Picnicking + Hiking ï Snowshoeing ? Visitor Center g Cross Country Skiing Idaho Birding Trail PONDEROSA SCENIC BYWAY MAP: SITES 1 - 12 BOISE RIVER WMA GRIMES CREEK 1 Milepost 15 2 Milepost 28.8 + R* SEASON: Year-round.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES ~ FEMA EM - 3287-CA Total Incidents from 6/22/08 - 8/06/08
    CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES ~ FEMA EM - 3287-CA Total Incidents from 6/22/08 - 8/06/08 BEAR WALLOW SHF JUNE LIGHTNING 12,067 Acres 31 Acres Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/21/2008 UKONOM COMPLEX PANTHER FIRE ALPS COMPLEX 43,390 Acres 11,022 Acres 3,026 Acres Started 6/23/2008 Started 7/24/2008 WHISKEYTOWN COMPLEX Started 6/21/2008 6,240 Acres BLUE 2 FIRE SISKIYOU Started 6/21/2008 6,950 Acres COMPLEX GOULD FIRE Started 6/20/2008 57,785 Acres 229 Acres SHU LIGHTNING COMPLEX PETERSON COMPLEX Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/21/2008 86,500 Acres 7,842 Acres Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/21/2008 MAD COMPLEX DEL 3,705 Acres NORTE CORRAL FIRE Started 6/20/2008 12,434 Acres SISKIYOU Started 6/23/2008 MODOC IRON COMPLEX TGU LIGHTNING COMPLEX 83,340 Acres 22,907 Acres Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/21/2008 HELL'S HALF COMPLEX 15,146 Acres LMU JUNE LIGHTNING Started 6/20/2008 SHASTA 50 Acres Started 6/21/2008 LIME COMPLEX HUMBOLDT 63,192 Acres LASSEN Started 6/20/2008 CUB COMPLEX MILL COMPLEX 19,718 Acres 2,100 Acres HUMBOLDT COMPLEX Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/22/2008 1,325 Acres TRINITY Started 6/21/2008 CANYON COMPLEX RICH FIRE TEHAMA 6,570 Acres PLUMAS 37,357 Acres Started 7/29/2008 YOLLA BOLLY COMPLEX Started6/21/2008 6,625 Acres Started 6/21/2008 CRAIG FIRE GLENN SIERRA YUBA RIVER COMPLEX BUTTE 2,500 Acres MEU LIGHTNING COMPLEX 4,254 Acres Started 8/03/2008 54,817 Acres Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/21/2008 MENDOCINO COLUSA YUBA AMERICAN RIVER COMPLEX LAKE NEVADA SODA COMPLEX 20,541 Acres 8,632 Acres Started 6/21/2008 Started 6/21/2008 SUTTER PLACER CAPPS FIRE
    [Show full text]
  • Ponderosa Pine Scenic Byway Wildlife Viewing Guide
    PONDEROSA PINE SCENIC BYWAY WILDLIFE VIEWING GUIDE INTRODUCTION WILDLIFE VIEWING TIPS • Observe wildlife from a distance. Use binoculars he Ponderosa Pine Scenic Byway (along or a camera with zoom lens for a closer look. Highway 21 from Boise to Stanley) traverses • Use your senses of hearing, sight, & smell to spot T a variety of landscapes from foothills & high animal sign such as tracks, nests, trails, & scat. elevation forests to scenic river canyons & majestic • Wildlife watching requires patience. Move slowly & mountain peaks. The diversity of plant communities quietly. along the route provides habitat for hundreds of wildlife species including moose, black bear, elk, • Plan your visit according to the season & time of snowshoe hare, coyote, red fox, songbirds, eagles & day. Mammals are generally more active at dawn more. & dusk while birds may be observed throughout the This guide features sites where you can explore day. the region’s unique wildlife habitats & enrich your • Take photos, notes & drawings of your appreciation of nature. A variety of wild places awaits observations. you. • Use field guides to learn more Remember: Tread lightly, stay on trails, & leave what about wildlife & plants. you find. Pack out what you bring in. Be aware of • For more informationon wildlife viewing use changing road & weather conditions. Be considerate the QR Code below or visit: of other visitors & please be careful with fire. fishandgame.idaho.gov/explore Enjoy the journey! DAHO I F I E S H M & GA Nature viewing along Highway 21 from Boise to Stanley PONDEROSA SCENIC BYWAY MAP OVERVIEW PONDEROSA SCENIC BYWAY INSET LOCATION IN IDAHO LEGEND R Restrooms c Camping $ Fees ; Interpretive Trail t Trailhead * Fishing h ADA Access P Picnicking + Hiking ï Snowshoeing ? Visitor Center g Cross Country Skiing Idaho Birding Trail PONDEROSA SCENIC BYWAY MAP: SITES 1 - 12 BOISE RIVER WMA GRIMES CREEK 1 Milepost 15 2 Milepost 28.8 + R* SEASON: Year-round.
    [Show full text]
  • What Information Do People Use, Trust, and Find Useful During A
    Nat Hazards (2015) 76:615–634 DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1512-x ORIGINAL PAPER What information do people use, trust, and find useful during a disaster? Evidence from five large wildfires Toddi A. Steelman • Sarah M. McCaffrey • Anne-Lise Knox Velez • Jason Alexander Briefel Received: 9 April 2014 / Accepted: 4 November 2014 / Published online: 16 November 2014 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract The communication system through which information flows during a disaster can be conceived of as a set of relationships among sources and recipients who are concerned about key information characteristics. The recipient perspective is often neglected within this system. In this article, we explore recipient perspectives related to what information was used, useful, and trustworthy in a wildfire context. Using a survey (n = 873) on five large wildfires in 2009 and 2010, we found significant gaps between the sources that were used by the most respondents and those that that they rated as useful or trustworthy. The sources that were used most before the fires were highly correlated with the sources that were used most during the fire. Keywords Public information Á Communication Á Used Á Useful Á Trustworthy 1 Introduction Information is an essential resource during a disaster. Without information, responders cannot effectively manage a disaster, and those affected by the disaster cannot best adapt to T. A. Steelman (&) School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, 329 Kirk Hall, 117 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7H 2J5, Canada e-mail: [email protected] S. M. McCaffrey Northern Research Station USDA Forest Service, 1033 University Place, #360, Evanston, IL 60626, USA e-mail: [email protected] A.-L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fires on Flathead Forest Grow Slightly, Expected to Burn for Weeks
    Houston East (CAMS 1) monitoring site AUGUST 26, 2011 EXCEPTIONAL EVENTS DEMONSTRATION PACKAGE For the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria One-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY P.O. BOX 13087 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-3087 September 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................v List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 A Conceptual Model of Ozone for the HGB Area ................................................. 1-1 1.2 Trends in HGB Area Emissions and Ozone Levels ............................................. 1-2 1.3 Ozone Reduction Progress at the Houston East (CAMS 1) Monitoring Site ...... 1-4 1.4 The Exceptional Event of August 26, 2011 ......................................................... 1-5 Chapter 2: Exceptional Event Rule Requirements for States .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 California Mobilization Guide
    2021 2021 California Mobilization Guide Table of Contents Chapter 10 – Objectives, Policy, Scope of Operations and Administration ....................................................1 Mission Statement ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographic Area Coordination Center ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Unit Level .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Incident Priorities ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Initial Attack ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Immediate Need ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Drawdown for Initial Attack (IA) ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mobilization/
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire and Typhoon Survey Results
    March 2020 Bermuda Monetary Authority Wildfire and Typhoon Survey Results 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................3 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................4 3 PERIL LOSS INFORMATION .....................................................................................................................5 4 DETAILED EVENT LOSS INFORMATION ..............................................................................................7 5 MODELS USED ..............................................................................................................................................8 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarises key results from the Authority’s Wildfire and Typhoon Survey, which collected claims and other data for California Wildfires 2017-2019, Australian Wildfires 2019 and Japan Typhoons 2018-2019. The survey captures a material portion of the Bermuda general insurance market and also includes non-commercial classes such as Special Purpose Insurers (SPIs). Survey results show that the Bermuda insurance market1 has been a material contributor to the recent wildfire and typhoon insurance losses incurred in California and Japan, respectively. The Bermuda market incurred $9.2 billion gross claims ($5.1 billion net) in the last three years of the wildfire losses in California and $9.6 billion
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Snowex 2020 Experiment Plan
    NASA SnowEx 2020 Experiment Plan Draft (August 2019) Leadership Team: H.P. Marshall1,2, Carrie Vuyovich3, Chris Hiemstra2, Ludo Brucker3, Kelly Elder4, Jeff Deems5, Jerry Newlin6 Other contributing authors: Ned, Bair7, Roger Bales8, Anne Nolin9, Ernesto Trujillo10, Jim McNamara1, Chago Rodriguez1, Maggi Kraft1, McKenzie Skiles11, Andy Gleason12, Dan McGrath13, Noah Molotch14, Kate Hale14, Ryan Webb15, Mike Durand16, Paul Houser17, Jessica Lundquist18, Chris Chickadel18, Delwyn Moller19, Batuhan Osmanoglu3, Kat Bormann20, Steve Tanner5 1) Department of Geosciences, Boise State University 2) U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 3) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 4) U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 5) National Snow and Ice Data Center 6) ATA Aerospace, LLC 7) Earth Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara 8) Sierra Nevada Research Institute, University of California Merced 9) Department of Geography, University of Nevada, Reno 10) USDA Northwest Watershed Research Center 11) Department of Geography, University of Utah 12) Department of Geosciences, Fort Lewis College 13) Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University 14) Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder 15) Center for Water and the Environment, University of New Mexico 16) School of Earth Sciences, Ohio State University 17) Geography and Geoinformation Science, George Mason University 18) Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington 19) Remote Sensing Solutions 20) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory 1 Document Change Record Document version Description of main change(s) 2019-07 Initial draft in review by SnowEx Leadership 2019-08 (this version) Draft released to THP16 Advisors 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 Western U.S.
    [Show full text]