SPINA BIFIDA
Dr Kevin DUNNE Developmental Medicine Rehabilitation Service 2010
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida
Aetiology/Classification Malformation of spinal cord and brain Incidence/ Prevalence/Prevention 28 days of development of embryo Initial assessment Failure of fusion of neural folds during neuralation Clinical Description Cause unknown? Management ?Genetic ?Metabolic ? Environmental Orthopaedic/Neuro/urology 75% isolated Education/social 25% associated with other defects Outcome
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida
Partial paralysis of lower limbs Neurogenic bladder No weakness Urinary incontinence Partial paralysis renal and bladder abnormalities Wheelchair dependence Neurogenic bowel Faecal incontinence Joint deformity Skin Spinal abnormalities anaesthetic –pressure sores Scoliosis Kyphosis/lordosis
1 Spina Bifida Spina Bifida
Hydrocephalus spina bifida occulta 10% adult spines
Arnold Chiari Type 2
CSF shunt menilingocele 6% cases Learning problems 11% survivors
Upper spinal cord mild abnormalities myelomeningocoele 94% cases 89%survivors Mild upper limb problems Encephalocele
Lipomeningocele
Spina Bifida -types- types Myelomeningocele
N Dysraphisn Meningocele MM
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Thoracic
2 Spina Bifida Meningocele Severe
Incidence Spina BifidaBifida--incidenceincidence
Australia 0.95/1000 Varies from country to country Range 11-- 5 /1000 live births Western Europe 1.51.5--3.03.0/1000 High in Celts (Ireland , Wales)
Low in Northern Europe. Sex Incidence Encephaloceles higher in SE Asia Male 58%
Female 42%
Foetal neural tube Spina Bifida
Conception -D18- D18 3 germ layers which make the different tissues and the neural plate forms along length of fetus QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. D19 -D28- D28
Neural tubes folds and should close along length of foetus
3 Spina BifidaBifida-- Classification Myelomeningocele
Neural tube defect Cervical 0.5% mild
Anencephaly 50% (lethal) Thoracic only 0.5% Severe Spina Bifida Cystica Low thoracic 27% Severe Myelomeningcele 45% (2/3 – 90% live) Meningocele 5% (all live) High Lumbar L1L1--2223% WChair Encephalocele Low Lumb,Upper sacral 45%Braces
Lipomyelomenigocele Lower sacral 4% Independ Clinically similar but no Hydrocephalus
Spina Bifida Occulta
?10 % back pain, constipation
Lipomyelomeningocele Lipomeningocele
Lipoma
Grows in the spinal canal or outside
Press on the spinal cord
Nerves traverse and become nonfunctional
Partial weakness of lower limbs
Neurogenic bladder and bowel
Spine abnormality
No hydrocephalus – normal cognition
Spina BifidaBifida-- Aetiology Genetics
Unknown –multifactorial– multifactorial MultiMulti--factorialfactorial Abnormal gene interacts with other genetic loci and or environmental factors to modulate the incidence or 1 affected child 1:50 Recurrence Risk
severity of the defect. 2 affected children 1:10 RR
Genetic 3 affected children 1:4 RR Increased in chromosomal abnormalities i.e. trisomy 13 and 18. Note Increased in siblings and other relatives Risk of any child born with a major defect 1:30 (3%) Abnormal genes If an adult with Spina Bifida has a child risk is 1:25 Som VANGL1 (mouse, 3/166) (NEJM 356,(14)2007,
4 Spina BifidaBifida-- aetiology Incidence
Drugs Australia 0.95/1000 Valproate (1%) Western Europe 1.5- 1.5-33/1000 Methotrexate Clomiphene Male 58% Folic acid antagonists Trimethaprim, Anticonvulsants Environment Incidence has decreased significantly in Maternal diabetes, Hyperthermia, Victoria, largely due to termination, PaternalPaternal-- Agent orange secondarily due to folate.
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida - Prevalence Common Birth Defect
NTD conceptions in Victoria
40% decline 1995 to 2000
Due to folic acid supplementation
1995 2005
NTD 19.2 -12.2/10000 -12.2/10000
Spina Bifida 8.3 -7.9/10000 -7.9/10000
Increase in encephalocele (increased Asian)
Reduced births due to TOP
Spina Bifida Number of new cases/year Royal Children’s Hospital
30
25
20
15 number new SB cases 10
5
0 1970 1990 2000 2006 2008
5 Spina Bifida Spina BifidaBifida--PreventionPrevention Incidence
So why have the numbers dropped 1960’s Laurence in Wales ?Vitamin Deficiency. 1970’s Smithells Periconceptual multivitamins Antenatal diagnosis with ultrasound RdReduced concepti on rat e if previ ous NTD Methodological flaws Termination of pregnancy MRC Study 1992 Folate – small impact Multi centre trial Stopped at 1400 (n = 2000) 76% reduction recurrence risk for NTD Small drop in prevalence Folate rather than other Vitamins the cause
Folate SB --FolateFolate Prevention
Folate supplementation reduces recurrence by How does it work – unknown up to 72% Lancet 1991 Generalizable.? Berry NEJM 2004 RdRecommend - 130000 Chinese women 0.4 mg folate,117000 controls 1 month prepre-- and 3 months postpost--conceptionconception – 41% reduction NTD Routine 0.5mg daily Risks –nil reported ? Twins High risk pregnancy 5mg oral daily Parent with SB How much? Parent with a previously affected child Mother on AntiAnti--EpilepticEpileptic Drugs 0.4mg –36% Mother with Diabetes Mellitus 5mg - 85%
PeriPeri--conceptualconceptual folic acid NTD Recurrence Risk Awareness post 1996,1999
Before 1997 2000 0ne child 2% Two Children 10% 1515--2424 yrs 5% 6% 4% Parent NTD 4%
Blood related 1% 2525--3434 yrs19% 24% 29%
34yrs+ 12% 16% 26% Remarry 0.6%
6 Spina Bifida SB – Folate to flour
12.2 NTD per 10000 Folate added to flour conceptions Average daily consumption 85 NTD for 70000 Supplement to 0.4 mg conceptions Vic pa
5 new case treated USA and 38 other countries
1% blood relative risk 36 % reduction in NTD
Australia about to start
Spina Bifida MultidisiplinaryTeam Management
Allied Health Medical
Stomal therapist Urologist
Physiotherapist Neurosurgeon Occupational therapist Orthopaedics
Orthotist Neonatologist
Paediatrician
Spina Bifida Multidisciplinary team Antenatal diagnosis
Neuropsychologist Ultrasound Social Worker Lesion vertebral column
Clinical Psychologist Hydrocephalus – lemon sign
Education Amniocentesis General practitioner AFP, open lesion only
Maternal Serum Screening Spina Bifida Association -social-social AFP non specific (twins, down etc)
7 Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Antenatal Ultrasound Antenatal Ultrasound
Can visualise at 1515--1616 weeks Ultrasound –“sac”– “sac” Vertebra have 3 ossification centres
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Antenatal ultrasound Foetal Surgery
Lemon and banana sign Does foetal surgery improve outcome
Randomized trial USA
Ongoing at moment
No data yet
Spina Bifida Termination Mode of Delivery
Prenatal Ultrasound Improved outcome with elective LUCS 1818--2020 weeks Use if leg movement seen on US
Detailed foetal anatomy Rationale FetoFeto--maternalmaternal obstetric outpatients for – reduces damage to neural plaque discussions and counselling 2 neurosegmental levels better Termination at 20-20-2222 weeks should the parents choose Bladder and bowel status unchanged (LUTHY et al NEJM 1989)
8 Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Initial Assessment Initial Assessment
Refer specialist centre Clinical exam –chromosomal/other Neurosurgical assessment Extent of lesion –can– can it be closed Paediatric assessment Motor level Discussion with family Hydrocephalus cranial US Facts not biases Musculoskeletal Hip US If severe - non treatment option Joint deformity Family’s wishes respected Spine deformity Palliative care –10% survive Renal Renal US
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Initial Assessment
“to treat or not to treat” Treatment considerations Prior 1955 most died
Hydrocephalus, Meningitis , Renal Severe paralysis 1955 CSF shunt (VA), Ileal conduits Severe hydrocephalus 19551955--7070 many with severe abnormalities Kyphosis Treatment Criteria Other congenital Lorber 1971 abnormalities Smith and Smith 1973
Spina Bifida SB - Neurosurgical Initial Treatment
Back closure within 24 hours (infection) Back Closure Prophylactic antibiotics Within 24 hours
Delay closure for 72 hour Preserve nerves Monitor for hydrocephalus Motor deterioration post surgery
Back closure head circumference increases Shunt insertion about 1 week later Investigations US, CT MRI
Hospital 11--33 weeks Back closure - hydrocephalus
9 Spina Bifida SB - Hydrocephalus Hydrocephalus
8080--90%90% develop significant hydrocephalus Increased with higher level
26% present at birth and by 1 month of age in 77% Rarely develops after 6 months Frequently progress after back closure/ Most shunts in 1st month.
SB - Hydrocephalus CSF Shunt
Arnold chiari type 2 VP shunt
Complications
Infection, obstruction, disconnection
Low pressure
Arnold Chiari Type 2 Tethered Cord Causes
Myelomeningocele
Post operative
Tight filum
Lipoma/lipomeningocele
Split Cord (diastematomyelia) Dermal sinus
Tight or fatty filum terminale
10 Tethered Cord Symptoms Spina Bifida Tethering
Pain WeaknessWeakness-- evolving Sensory Loss Incontinence Scoliosis Cutaneous markers
Investigate Muscle chart, MRI
Lipoma -tethering-tethering Diastematomyelia
Neurosurgical Clinical Filum terminale
Epilepsy
10 –15%
Increased with shunt obstruction, Infection, ventriculitis
Arachnoid Cysts
Sphyrinx
11 Spina Bifida SB Orthopedic Aims
Orthopaedic Pattern of motor development near normal
Maximize mobility
Stable posture if standing
Centre of gravity over feet
Prevent pelvic obliquity Correct spinal deformity
“stability of skin”
SB Orthopaedics SB - Orthopaedic Principals Hip
Developmental knowledge Hip Flexion contracture Natural history of condition Anterior hip release
Monitor progress Femoral or pelvic osteotomies Time interventions Abduction External Rotation Deformity Investigations Limitation of Abduction
Imaging Hip surveillance prevent dislocation
Muscle Charts
Gait analysis
SB Orthopaedic SB Orthopaedics Hip dislocation Knee
Thoracic L1, L2, L3 53% Valgus deformity L4 33% Flail undeformed knee L5 20% Undeformed knee with Bilateral reduced quadricep Operative benefit ?marginal Fixed flexion Pain Prevent hip flexion contracture – or fit an orthosis (RGO) Treatment Cast Unilateral Braces Leg length discrepancy, pelvic obliquity Muscle transfers Ducubiti Ostetomies Operate on low lesion
12 Deformities in Ankle Feet Clubbed Feet
The deformities include; Equinus deformity Clubfoot or talippqes equino varus deformity . Calcaneal deformity. Cavus or cavocavo--varusvarus deformity. PlanoPlano--valgusvalgus deformity.
Spine deformity Scoliosis Surgery
Scoliosis Kyphosis
Lordosis
Monitored by Xray
Worsen with age Adolescence
Pain , decubiti sitting Brace
Surgery
SB Orthopaedics Techniques AFO
Casting
Orthosis
Soft tissue releases
Muscle transfers
Bony procedures Osteotomies
Arthodesis
Ilizarov frames
13 RGO KAFO Reciprocating gait orthosis
Knee and ankle stability
Mobilize with crutches
Lock to enable sitting
Spina Bifida Muscles and movement 3 Urology
Physiotherapist Bladder In community provide regular therapy Bowel Eqqpuipment assessment and funding Skin Independent skills - transfers/muscle strength RCH service 6-6-12mly12mly muscle mapping
Orthopedic surgeries Major reason for admission
SB SB Urology Neurogenic Bladder Treatment
90% plus affected Principles Protect the kidney’s from damage Inervation S2S2--44 Social continence Associations Management
VU reflux Evaluate renal tract (imaging, urodynamics) Regular imaging ( deterioration silent) Renal Anomalies (horseshoe kidney) Prevent infection (Bactrim, keflex, macrodantin, Bladder wall trabeculation cranberry)
UTI/pyelonephritis Treat infection Investigate deterioration Surgery
14 SB Neuropathic Bladder 2 Neurogenic Bladder Bladder type Contractile Intermediate Acontractile Types *most common Detrusor Strongly Continuous weak Doesn’t contract contraction Areflexic (acontractile) Sphincter tone High Weak/ ineffective Weak Enlar ged Urine dribbles Outflow Obstructed Obstructed Mild resistance Sphincter incompetent (incomplete relaxation) common Effects High residual volume, Small capacity and Continuous dribbling small bladder capacity continuous dribbling
Contractile (Spastic) Upper tracts At riskAt riskRarely at risk Small Volume Thick wall Options C.I.C C.I.C Anticholinergic Sphincterotomy Sphincterotomy Botox AND C.I.C Augmentation Augmentation
SB Neurogenic Bladder Neuropathic bladder 4 Investigations 1. Preserve renal function (ensure emptying and prevent infection) Renal Ultrasounds Yearly 2. Achieve continence MCU prn
Medical Surgical Nuclear Scans Baseline prn Clean intermittent Botulinum toxin catheterisation Sphincterotomy Urodynamics Prn Anticholinergics (reduce Bladder augmentation detrusor hyperreflexia) Cystoscopy prn Artificial urinary sphincter Manage infections Vesicostomy, urinary diversion/ undiversion Mitroffanoff procedure
SB Urology SB Urodynamics Surgery
Reflux surgery Vesicostomies high pressure, infection Bladder Augmentation Enlarge the bladder (mucus, rupture, cancer) Flap from Ureter, stomach, bowel, cultured cells Mitrofanoff - appendix for anterior access Artificial Sphincters Select candidates Ileal Conduits Bleed, Stenosis, stones, Cancer, Last 10 years
15 SB Augmentation cystoplasty SB Artificial Sphincter
SB Urology SB Urology Recent Developments Continence
Botox Initially nappies
High pressure bladder Prophalactic antibiotics
Detrusor instability Clean intermittent catheterization 3 -5/day Pads Nerve Transplants Bokka Pants
Chinese research Condom drainage Improved function Medication eg oxybutinin Trials underway in USA Surgery
Spina Bifida Neurogenic Bowel Neuropathic bowel 1
90% + have faecal incontinence 25% of adults with Spina Bifida are bowel continent Sensory nerve to colon, rectum, anus Most who are incontinent have poor sensation S2-4 AND either Autonomic nerves
Major social problem i. Increased bowel Constipation and outlet resistance overflow diarrhoea ii. Decreased bowel Frequent stools outlet resistance throughout the day
16 SB Neurogenic bowel SB Neurogenic Bowel Types Principles
Patulous anus and constipation Aim for social continence Diarrhoa No single program that works
Diet sensitive Bowel management starts from birth
1010-- 20% Try to have a program by school Loperamide Teenagers and adults work it out Patulous anus and constant leakage
Seen in mobile (abdominal compression)
SB Neurogenic Bowel SB Neurogenic Bowel Treatment Treatments
Nappies initially Suppositories Diet Microlax enema’s Give 4-4-55 hour clean - good for school Laxatives often worsen but used. BlBowel wash outs Movicol 2 or 3 per week Timed Toileting Malone antegrade enema Pressure Anal Plugs Digital stimulation Work well in some 30% , expensive, last 6 hrs Combinations Buttock strapping eg for swimming
SB neurogenic Bowel SB Neurogenic Bowel Malone procedure Malone/ Anal plugs
17 Malone Antegrade Bowel Washout Washout Peristeen System
SB - Bowel Management Experimental SB Pressure sores
Gracilis slings Skin Level
dermatomes
Electrical stimulation Mapped using pin prick Can be different to motor level
Problem anaesthetic skin Cuff similar to Artifical Sphincter. Pressure areas sitting braces
Burns
friction
SB Decubitus Decubitus
18 Spina Bifida SB Pressure sores Pressure Sores
Prevalence 20 -25%-25% Prevention Pressure care training, regular lifts 80 –90% will have at some stage Correct fitting orthosis Cause Pressure cushions Anaesthetic skin
Excessive pressure 42% Site Orthosis 23% Low Lumbar, Sacral Feet, buttocks Urine, faecal soiling 23% Thoracic, high lumbar Friction 10% Spine, buttocks, feet
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Other Medical Issues Latex Allergy
Recognized since late 1980’s Obesity ? Due to intra abdominal surgery Especially in adolescence Most Sensitivity Rash, lip swelling Stop walking - wheelchair Rubber gloves, catheters, balloons Endocrine
Some Anaphylaxis Precocious puberty, osteoporosis Risk during surgery Prevalence 33% on RAST Ophthalmology Treatment Psychological Test Latex free theatre Adults suicidal ideation 10%
Spina Bifida Cognitive function Cognitive
Intellectual disability General intelligence “normal range”
strongly associated Skewed to the lower end with hydrocephalus Sppgecific Learning difficulties
Verbal IQ > Performance IQ
Relative Deficit Increases with age
Primary school 5 points down --overestimatesoverestimates Secondary 10- 10-1515 points down
Factors
Hydrocephalus, shunt blockage, infection
19 Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Cognitive profile Cognitive profile
Executive Functions Visuo motor Integration Difficulty completing task Difficulty organizing task Delayed laterality Overwhelmed byyp complex new information Poor motor planning Impulsive Poor hand control Difficulty applying new knowledge Higher order Language Slow mastery of writing Information Processing (memory) Untidy and disorganized presentation or Attention Memory, New learning written work Poor sequential and working memory Sequencing
Spina Bifida SB School Educational Problems
Most attend normal school Lack of understanding about cognitive Special on cognitive grounds (Yooralla ) problems parent should visit schools Toileting expectations unrealistic UlliUsually require an i ntegrati on aid e Continence Academically problems around Grade 4 Cognitive Teacher zealous –disillusioned Safety School modifications ( access, toilets) Child withdrawn, depression Program Support group Socialization issues School therapy
Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Secondary School Therapy
Cognitive Difficulties more apparent Developmental program
Mobility/incontinence affect relationships Mainly physiotherapy
Peer group issue – isolation OT many have upper limb/ cognitive issue Poor body image Speech Sexuality issues RCH initially or
Impotence in males Specialist Children Services (home) Misery , low self esteem Centre Based from 3y Depression School based therapy
20 Spina Bifida Therapy Continence
Continence nurses Motor development depends on level Advise: management of the L3 and quads for walking bladder and bowels Training (CIC, washouts): Motor developmental program parents, carers , aides and patients Standing frames Applications for CAAS funding Walking frames Sourcing equipment (catheters, pads, nappies, Braces specialised underwear) Crutches Also Stomal Therapists Wheelchair training and Wound Care!
Spina Bifida SB Social problems Post School
Friendship difficulties Unrealistic expectations re careers Realization that they are different 77--8y8y Tertiary few
Exclusion by peers University a few .
Unable to keep up in playground TAFE Reduced self esteem Employment
Body image problems Independent Living
Spina Bifida Transition
CLINIC STAFF When complete high school Sometimes ongoing orthopaedics or Monitoring urology Medical 6 monthly Orthopaedic varies MECRS Physio annually Neurosurgery - annually Monash Urology 6 -12-12 monthly Bendigo, Ballarat, Geelong Ultrasounds 1-1-22 years
21 Spina Bifida Spina Bifida Adults Outcome Medical
Medical Urological
Psychological Recurrent UTI 38%
Emppyloyment Hypertension 11%
Housing Stomal Problems 58%
Review recommended 36%
Orthopaedic
Spina Bifida Adults Spina Bifida Adults Medical Medical
Orthopaedic Neurosurgical
Symptoms of cord tethering 14%
Backache 25% Shunt review 4%
Knee Instability 15% Seizures 2%
Hip pain 14%
Shoulder Pain 10%
Arthritis 6%
Spina Bifida Adults Spina Bifida Adults Education Psychological
Depression 5% 114 Seen in 1992 Anxiety 3% Tertiary 8%
Psychosis 2% Completed High School 16%
Suicide attempts 7% Special school 28%
Substance Abuse 7%
England 42% completed high school compared to 75% Controls (Tew 1984)
22 Spina Bifida Adults Spina Bifida Adults Pregnancy Employment -Home- Home
Competitive Employment 33% 17 women 23 pregnancies Not Working54% Less complications if Vaginal delivery
Living with parent 62% Recurrent UTI
Pyelonephritis
Back pain Pressure sores
The End
i. Which tissues are involved? ii. Where is the lesion?
Spina bifida occulta (bone 1% Cervical only (Level 1) only) 1% Thoracic only (Level 1) 10% adult spines
6% Lower thoracic (Level 2) Meningocoele (bone and QuickTime™ and a QuickTime™ and a decompressor decompressor are needed to seeand this picture. Upper lumbar (Level 3) meninges) are needed to see this picture. 6% SB, 11% survivors 92% occur at L3 and below Myelomeningocoele [42% Lumbosacral jct (Level (bone, meninges, nerves) 4)] Lower sacral (Level 5) 94% SB, 89% survivors
23 Myelomeningocele Neuropathic Bowel 2 Functional Ambulation
Diet, fluids Non Ambulator Thoracic Regular sit, cough, push on toilet
Laxatives, enemas, washouts Household Thoracic –L3– L3
AllAnal plugs QuickTime™ and a Indoors only, braces decompressor are needed to see this picture. Biofeedback Wheelchair
Malone Procedure Community L3 –Sacral–Sacral (exclude other causes diarrhoea) Indoor/outdoor Braces Crutches Wheelchair long distances
SB –Prevention Sensation PeriPeri--conceptualconceptual folic acid Sensory loss below level of lesion Occupational Patchy therapists Folic acid 0.5mg Dense Seating advise High risk of pressure areas/burns (includes car) 2 month pre conception Slow healing (poor blood supply) Pressure care Family history 5mg . Historically, common cause of death Tools for function/ home modification (hoists, rails, handles, grips) Campaigns 1996,1999 Upper limb function QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Driver’s Licence
Roho cushion
SB Orthopaedic Spina Bifida Ilizarov frame Initial Assessment
Treatment considerations
Severe paralysis
Severe hydrocephalus
Kyphosis
Other congenital abnormalities
24 Spina BifidaBifida--NumbersNumbers
Treated at the RCH
1970 27
1980 23
1990 15
1995 5
2000 4
2005 4
Spina Bifida Embryology
25