Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks SCENIHR Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products The SCENIHR adopted this opinion at the 22nd plenary on 6 February 2008, after public consultation. Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products About the Scientific Committees Three independent non-food Scientific Committees provide the Commission with the scientific advice it needs when preparing policy and proposals relating to consumer safety, public health and the environment. The Committees also draw the Commission's attention to the new or emerging problems which may pose an actual or potential threat. They are: the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and are made up of external experts. In addition, the Commission relies upon the work of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA), the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). SCENIHR Questions concerning emerging or newly-identified risks and on broad, complex or multi- disciplinary issues requiring a comprehensive assessment of risks to consumer safety or public health and related issues not covered by other Community risk- assessment bodies. In particular, the Committee addresses questions related to potential risks associated with interaction of risk factors, synergic effects, cumulative effects, antimicrobial resistance, new technologies such as nanotechnologies, medical devices, tissue engineering, blood products, fertility reduction, cancer of endocrine organs, physical hazards such as noise and electromagnetic fields and methodologies for assessing new risks. Scientific Committee members Anders Ahlbom, James Bridges, Wim De Jong, Philippe Hartemann, Thomas Jung, Mats-Olof Mattsson, Jean-Marie Pagès, Konrad Rydzynski, Dorothea Stahl, Mogens Thomsen, David Williams Contact: European Commission Health & Consumer Protection DG Directorate C: Public Health and Risk Assessment Unit C7 - Risk Assessment Office: B232 B-1049 Brussels [email protected] © European Commission 2008 The opinions of the Scientific Committees present the views of the independent scientists who are members of the committees. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The opinions are published by the European Commission in their original language only. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/risk_en.htm 2 Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Members of the working group are acknowledged for their valuable contribution to this opinion. The members of the working group are: SCENIHR members: Dr. Mogens Thomsen (Chair and Rapporteur) Prof. Anders Ahlbom1 Prof. James Bridges Prof. Konrad Rydzynski2 External experts: Tony Axéll2, PhD, Professor, Senior Consultant, Maxillofacial Unit, Halmstad Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden John Britton3, MD, MSc, FRCP, FFPH, Professor of Epidemiology and Honorary Consultant in Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK Erik Dybing4, MD, PhD, Division Director and Professor, Division of Environmental Medicine, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway Hans Gilljam2, MD, PhD, Professor of Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Jacques Le Houezec2,5 , PhD, Consultant in Public Health, Rennes, France and Special Lecturer, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK Marcus R. Munafò4, PhD, Reader in Biological Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom Jagadeesan Nair, PhD, Group Leader, Division of Toxicology and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany Kurt Straif, MD, MPH, PhD, Scientist, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France Saman Warnakulasuriya2, PhD, FDSRCS, DSc, Professor in Oral Medicine & Experimental Pathology, King's College London Dental Institute, University of London, London, UK Unfortunately Jagadeesan Nair died during the summer 2007. The whole working group appreciated his positive attitude during the many group meetings and recognises his great contribution to the opinion, in particular concerning the chemistry and role of nitrosamine adducts. Mogens Thomsen, on behalf of the working group. 1 Declared interest (see the minutes of the SCENIHR Plenary http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_mi_014.pdf) 2 Declared interest (see the minutes of the SCENIHR Plenary http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_mi_011.pdf) 3 Declared interest (see the minutes of the SCENIHR Plenary http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_mi_009.pdf) 4 Declared interest (see the minutes of the SCENIHR Plenary http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_mi_012.pdf) 5 Declared interest (see the minutes of the SCENIHR Plenary http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_mi_017.pdf) 3 Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products The additional contribution from the following experts is gratefully acknowledged: Harri Vainio, MD, PhD, Director General, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland (member of the Working Group until December 2006) Paolo Boffetta, MD, MPH, Head of the Lifestyle, Environment and Cancer Group, Coordinator of the Genetics and Epidemiology Cluster, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France (member of the Working Group until October 2006) The views expressed in the SCENIHR opinion are not necessarily shared by all members of the working group. 4 Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products ABSTRACT The Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) has been asked to evaluate the health effects of smokeless tobacco products (STP) with particular attention to tobacco for oral use, moist snuff, which is called “snus” in Sweden. In addition to tobacco for oral use, STP include chewing tobacco, dry snuff and nasal snuff. The EC Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC) defines tobacco for oral use as “…all products for oral use, except those intended to be smoked or chewed, made wholly or partly of tobacco, in powder or in particulate form or in any combination of those forms”. Synonyms for “tobacco for oral use” are moist snuff (snus) and oral tobacco. Marketing of oral tobacco is banned in all EU-countries except Sweden while other STP are allowed in EU. Adverse health effects of smokeless tobacco products All STP contain nicotine, a potent addictive substance. They also contain carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines, albeit at differing levels. STP are carcinogenic to humans and the pancreas has been identified as a main target organ. All STP cause localised oral lesions and a high risk for development of oral cancer has been shown for various STP but the evidence for oral cancer in users of Swedish moist snuff (snus) is less clear. There is evidence for an increased risk of fatal myocardial infarction among STP users. Some data indicate reproductive effects of smokeless tobacco use during pregnancy but firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Addiction potential of smokeless tobacco products Smokeless tobacco is addictive and withdrawal symptoms are broadly similar to those seen in smokers. Use of STP as smoking cessation aid compared to pharmaceutical nicotine replacement products Due to insufficient evidence it is not possible to draw conclusions as to the relative effectiveness of smokeless tobacco as an aid to smoking cessation in comparison with established therapies. Impact of smokeless tobacco use on subsequent initiation of smoking There is some evidence from the USA that smokeless tobacco use may lead to subsequent cigarette smoking. The Swedish data do not support the hypothesis that smokeless tobacco (i.e. Swedish snus) is a gateway to future smoking. Social, cultural and product differences between North America and Europe and within Europe suggest caution in translating findings across countries. Extrapolation of the information on the patterns of smokeless tobacco use, smoking cessation and initiation from countries where oral tobacco is available to EU-countries where oral tobacco is not available. It is not possible to extrapolate future patterns of tobacco use across countries. In particular, it is not possible to extrapolate the trends in prevalence of smoking and oral tobacco use if it were made available in an EU-country where it is now unavailable due to societal and cultural differences. General conclusion STP are addictive and their use is hazardous to health. Evidence on the effectiveness of STP as a smoking cessation aid is insufficient, and relative trends in progression from STP into and from smoking differ between countries. It is thus not possible to extrapolate the patterns of tobacco use from one country where oral tobacco is available to other countries. Keywords: carcinogenic, health effects, moist snuff, nicotine, nitrosamines, oral tobacco, SCENIHR, smokeless tobacco, smoking, snus, STP Opinion to be cited as: SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified Health Risks), Scientific opinion on the Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products, 6 February 2008. 5 Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Drug Facts Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products
    Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause smokes about 1 pack (25 cigarettes) daily of disease, disability, and death in the United gets 250 “hits” of nicotine each day. States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), cigarette Upon entering the bloodstream, nicotine smoking results in more than 480,000 immediately stimulates the adrenal glands premature deaths in the United States each to release the hormone epinephrine year—about 1 in every 5 U.S. deaths—and an (adrenaline). Epinephrine stimulates the additional 16 million people suffer with a central nervous system and increases blood serious illness caused by smoking. In fact, for pressure, respiration, and heart rate. every one person who dies from smoking, about 30 more suffer from at least one Similar to other addictive drugs like cocaine serious tobacco-related illness.1 and heroin, nicotine increases levels of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which affects The harmful effects of smoking extend far the brain pathways that control reward and beyond the smoker. Exposure to secondhand pleasure. For many tobacco users, long- smoke can cause serious diseases and death. term brain changes induced by continued Each year, an estimated 88 million nicotine exposure result in addiction—a nonsmoking Americans are regularly exposed condition of compulsive drug seeking and to secondhand smoke and almost 41,000 use, even in the face of negative nonsmokers die from diseases caused by consequences. Studies suggest that secondhand smoke exposure.1,2 additional compounds in tobacco smoke, such as acetaldehyde, may enhance How Does Tobacco Affect the Brain? nicotine’s effects on the brain.3 Cigarettes and other forms of tobacco— When an addicted user tries to quit, he or including cigars, pipe tobacco, snuff, and she experiences withdrawal symptoms chewing tobacco—contain the addictive including irritability, attention difficulties, drug nicotine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2018 GSTHR 1 2 GSTHR
    NO FIRE, NO SMOKE: THE GLOBAL STATE OF TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 2018 GSTHR 1 2 GSTHR No Fire, No Smoke: The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2018 Written and edited by Harry Shapiro Report and website production coordination: Grzegorz Krol The full report (pdf) is available at www.gsthr.org Country profiles are available atwww.gsthr.org To obtain a hard copy of the full report go to www.gsthr.org/contact The Executive Summary is available in various languages at www.gsthr.org/translations Copy editing and proofing: Tom Burgess, Ruth Goldsmith and Joe Stimson Project management: Gerry Stimson and Paddy Costall Report design and layout: Urszula Biskupska Website design & coding: Filip Woźniak, Vlad Radchenko Print: WEDA sc Knowledge-Action-Change, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, WC2N 5BY © Knowledge-Action-Change 2018 Citation: No Fire, No Smoke: The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2018 (2018). London: Knowledge-Action-Change. NO FIRE, NO SMOKE: THE GLOBAL STATE OF TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION 2018 GSTHR 3 Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary: No Fire, No Smoke: The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2018 5 Scope and terminology 8 Website 8 Updating 8 Data sources and limitations 8 Forewords: 10 Nancy Sutthoff 10 David Sweanor 10 Martin Jarvis 11 Key acronyms and abbreviations 12 Chapter 1: Introduction: tobacco harm reduction 13 Chapter 2: The continuing global epidemic of cigarette smoking 17 Chapter 3: Safer nicotine products: a global picture 22 Chapter 4: Consumers of safer nicotine products 38 Chapter 5: Safer nicotine products
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Community Fact Sheet
    Tobacco Community Fact Sheet Sterling, Massachusetts Updated 08/01/19 The Massachusetts Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program The mission of the Massachusetts Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program (MTCP) is to reduce the health and economic burden of tobacco use by preventing young people from starting to smoke, helping current smokers to quit, and protecting children and adults from secondhand smoke. The following provides data and information on the impact tobacco use has on your city or town, and the strategies being used in your community to combat these issues. % of Adult Smokers Cigarette Smoking 40 An estimated 631 smokers live in Sterling (10.7% of adults, age 30 18+). 20 The adult smoking rate is 22% lower in Sterling than statewide 13.7 (10.7% in Sterling compared to 13.7% statewide). 10.7 10 The rate of smoking during pregnancy in Sterling is 32% lower than statewide (4.6% in Sterling compared to 6.8% statewide). 0 Sterling MA Health Effects of Smoking Evidence has linked smoking to diseases of nearly all organs of the body. The Surgeon General’s report concludes that smoking causes: lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or lung disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis and immune system weakness, increased risk for tuberculosis disease and death, ectopic (tubal) pregnancy and impaired fertility, erectile dysfunction, and age-related macular degeneration. Smoking can also trigger or make an asthma attack worse (2014 U.S. Surgeon General's Report). In Sterling, lung cancer incidence is 21% lower among males compared to the state of Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 13/Monday, January 23, 2017/Proposed Rules
    8004 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND comment will be made public, you are www.regulations.gov. Submit both HUMAN SERVICES solely responsible for ensuring that your copies to the Division of Dockets comment does not include any Management. If you do not wish your Food and Drug Administration confidential information that you or a name and contact information to be third party may not wish to be posted, made publicly available, you can 21 CFR Part 1132 such as medical information, your or provide this information on the cover [Docket No. FDA–2016–N–2527] anyone else’s Social Security number, or sheet and not in the body of your confidential business information, such comments and you must identify this Tobacco Product Standard for N- as a manufacturing process. Please note information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any Nitrosonornicotine Level in Finished that if you include your name, contact information marked as ‘‘confidential’’ Smokeless Tobacco Products information, or other information that will not be disclosed except in identifies you in the body of your accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, comments, that information will be applicable disclosure law. For more HHS. posted on http://www.regulations.gov. information about FDA’s posting of • ACTION: Proposed rule. If you want to submit a comment comments to public dockets, see 80 FR with confidential information that you 56469, September 18, 2015, or access SUMMARY: The Food and Drug do not wish to be made available to the the information at: http://www.fda.gov/ Administration (FDA) is proposing a public, submit the comment as a regulatoryinformation/dockets/ tobacco product standard that would written/paper submission and in the default.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Book--7-3-13A.Xlsx
    ASHLAND SPECIALTY CO. Product Listing (In alpha order by major category) Item No. Description (100-178) CIGARETTES 295642 24/7 GOLD 100 BOX 295667 24/7 GOLD KING BOX 295709 24/7 MENTHOL 100 BOX 330555 24/7 MENTHOL GOLD 100 BOX 295683 24/7 MENTHOL KING BOX 295626 24/7 RED 100 BOX 295600 24/7 RED KING BOX 295725 24/7 SILVER 100 BOX 279430 AMERICAN SPIRIT BALANCED BOX 272146 AMERICAN SPIRIT FULL BODIED BX 277483 AMERICAN SPIRIT FULL BODIED SP 272229 AMERICAN SPIRIT MELLOW BOX 272187 AMERICAN SPIRIT MELLOW SOFT 277525 AMERICAN SPIRIT MENT MELLOW BX 275743 AMERICAN SPIRIT MENTHOL BOX 277566 AMERICAN SPIRIT NON FILTER BX 293241 AMERICAN SPIRIT ORGANIC FULL 290940 AMERICAN SPIRIT ORGNIC MELLOW 295147 AMERICAN SPIRIT PERIQUE BOX 272260 AMERICAN SPIRIT SMOOTH MELLOW 333773 AMERICAN SPIRIT USGROWN MELLOW 251819 B & H 100 BOX 251777 B & H 100 SOFT 251959 B & H DELUXE MENTHOL 100 BOX 251975 B & H KING BOX 251892 B & H LUXURY 100 BOX 251850 B & H LUXURY 100 SOFT 251918 B & H LUXURY MENTHOL 100 BOX 251876 B & H LUXURY MENTHOL 100 SOFT 251835 B & H MENTHOL 100 BOX 251793 B & H MENTHOL 100 SOFT"PREM" 249417 BAILEY BLUE 100 249318 BAILEY BLUE KING 249516 BAILEY BLUE KING BOX 249391 BAILEY FILTER 100 249292 BAILEY FILTER KING 249490 BAILEY FILTER KING BOX 249458 BAILEY GREEN FIELD MENT 100 249359 BAILEY GREEN FIELD MENT KG 249433 BAILEY MENTHOL 100 249334 BAILEY MENTHOL KING 1 of 170 ASHLAND SPECIALTY CO. Product Listing (In alpha order by major category) Item No. Description 249532 BAILEY MENTHOL KING BOX 249474 BAILEY SKY BLUE 100 249375 BAILEY SKY BLUE
    [Show full text]
  • Naswar Dipping, Shift in Behavior in Multi Ethnicity Setting
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE chewing habits.2 thorough examination of oral cavity. of interleukin 1β, however, no differences in the disappear if its use is stopped.20. The use of levels of serum IL-6 were observed by the smokeless tobacco in Sweden has been found to Naswar, unlike other chewable tobacco, is used by Oral rinse was collected from 998 subjects in Karachi researchers. Similarly, Naswar was also found to be about 10-fold higher than the rest of Europe (17 NASWAR DIPPING, SHIFT IN BEHAVIOR IN ‘dipping’ placing a pinch either under the lower lip and Peshawar who were habitual of chewable alter thyroid function by significantly increasing countries) and more popular amongst men than or tongue, or inside the cheek from few minutes to tobacco after an informed consent. Samples of serum FT3 and FT4 levels.14 Regarding levels of trace women.21 MULTI ETHNICITY SETTING hours. Naswar is made from sundried tobacco oral-rinse were collected by giving the subjects 20 elements in blood, serum copper levels in naswar leaves of specie Nicotina rustica. After fine grinding ml distilled water to swish in their mouth for one addicts were significantly raised with a mean of 5.1 Toombak is another naswar like product which is Haya Naveen1, Saeeda Baig2, Wasfa Farooq2, Hira Attique3 these are mixed with calcium oxide and wood ash. minute and then spit in the 50 ml corning tubes. A ± 2.4 µg/dl compared to mean of 2.6 ±0.1 µg/dl in marketed in Sudan. Unlike naswar a lot of research 1Dorset County Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, UK, 2Department of Biochemistry, 15 Later cardamom and menthol are added for flavor dental floss with a small brush was handed over to healthy control group(P = 0.005).
    [Show full text]
  • Flavored Tobacco Products, Effective As of January 1, 2021
    ORDINANCE NO. ______ (CODE AMENDMENT NO. 772) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.10 (RETAIL SALES OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS) OF TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY) OF THE EL MONTE MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT THE SALE OF FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS, EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2021 WHEREAS, the potential failure of tobacco retailers to comply with tobacco control laws, particularly laws prohibiting the sale of tobacco products to minors, presents a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of El Monte (the “City”); WHEREAS, the federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act), enacted in 2009, prohibited candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes,i largely because these flavored products were marketed to youth and young adults,ii and younger smokers were more likely than older smokers to have tried these products;iii WHEREAS, although the manufacture and distribution of flavored cigarettes (excluding menthol) are banned by federal law,iv neither federal law nor California law restricts the sale of menthol cigarettes or flavored non-cigarette tobacco products, such as cigars, cigarillos, smokeless tobacco, hookah tobacco, electronic smoking devices, and the solutions used in these devices; WHEREAS, flavored tobacco products are very common in California tobacco retailers as evidenced by the following: • 97.4% of stores that sell cigarettes sell menthol cigarettes;v • 94.5% of stores that sell little cigars sell them in flavored varieties;vi • 84.2% of stores
    [Show full text]
  • Snus: the Original Reduced-Harm Tobacco Product
    * Snus: the original reduced-harm tobacco product Although not risk-free independent evidence1,2 less harmful than cigarettes suggests it’s 95-99% Consumed orally by Used for centuries in placing under the lip Scandinavia* Smokeless, so lacks the Gentle heating during harmful toxicants and manufacture reduces the number carcinogens associated with of cancer-causing chemicals cigarette combustion that form in the tobacco Snus is currently banned across the EU, except in Sweden where it originates This is preventing millions of smokers from experiencing its potential harm reduction benefits NORWAY SWEDEN EU Average Thanks to the popularity of Sweden snus as a cigarette substitute, SWEDEN 24% 5% Sweden enjoys the lowest smoking rate in Europe (5%)3,4 Achieving a smoking rate of >5% is the goal of multiple European states by 2040.5 5% Thanks to snus, Sweden is decades ahead of the majority of its fellow members NORWAY Only 10% of Swedish snus 6 users also smoke cigarettes Snus is legal in More adults in Norway suggesting its potential ability Norway as it isn’t an use snus than smoke to fully ‘off-ramp’ adult smokers EU member state 12% vs. 11%10 Snus is typically used by more UK Royal College of men than women, although Physicians it’s becoming increasingly “In Norway, snus is popular with both genders7 Similar to Sweden, dual use of snus and associated with smoking cigarettes is low11 cessation”4 Primarily owing to snus, Sweden Average EU Sweden’s male adult tobacco consumption is actually slightly *Contemporary snus has evolved from an early precursor product, first used in Sweden over 300 years ago 26% 25% 3 1 higher than the EU average ..
    [Show full text]
  • The a to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance
    The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The A to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance 2nd Edition, August 2003 Writer: Shawna Wakefield Editor: Christina Bennett, Kathleen Campbell With special thanks to: Kristen Krayer, Nellika Little, Mir Ahmad Joyenda Cover illustration: Parniyan Design and Printing: The Army Press © 2003 The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). All rights reserved. Preface This is the second edition of The A to Z Guide to Afghanistan Assistance. Our first edition was brought out one year ago at a time of great change in Afghanistan. At that time, coordination mechanisms and aid processes were changing so fast that old hands and new arrivals alike were sometimes overwhelmed by the multiplicity of acronyms and references to structures and entities that had been recently created, abolished or re-named. Eighteen months after the fall of the Taliban and the signing of the Bonn Agreement, there are still rapid new developments, a growing complexity to the reconstruction effort and to planning processes and, of course, new acronyms! Our aim therefore remains to provide a guide to the terms, structures, mechanisms and coordinating bodies critical to the Afghanistan relief and reconstruction effort to help ensure a shared vocabulary and common understanding of the forces at play. We’ve also included maps and a contact directory to make navigating the assistance community easier. This 2nd edition also includes a section called “Resources,” containing information on such things as media organisations, security information, and Afghanistan-related web sites. Another new addition is a guide to the Afghan government. As the objective of so many assistance agencies is to support and strengthen government institutions, we felt that understanding how the Afghan government is structured is important to working in the current environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Effects and Dependency Associated with Snuff Consumption
    Health effects and dependency associated with snuff consumption This is an excerpt from the full technical report, which is written in Norwegian. The excerpt provides the report’s main messages in English. N0. 06–2005 Systematic reviews Title Health effects and dependency associated with snuff consumption Norwegian title Virkninger av snusbruk Institution Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten) John-Arne Røttingen, Director Authors Inger Natvig Norderhaug, Research manager Erik Dybing, Hans Gilljam, Petter O. Lind, Karl Erik Lund, Jørg Mørland, Birgitta Stegmayr, Bjørn Hofmann, Ida-Kristin Ørjasæter Elvsaas ISBN 82-8121-051-6 ISSN 1503-9544 Report No. 6 – 2005 Project number 5-207 Type of report Systematic reviews No. of pages 133 Client The Norwegian Directorate of Health Subject heading Tobacco, Smokeless; Dependency (Psychology) (MeSH) Keywords Snuff Citation Norderhaug IN, Dybing E, Gilljam H, Lind P O., Lund KE, Mørland J, Stegmayr B, Hofmann B, Ørjasæter Elvsaas I-K. Health effects and dependency associated with snuff consumption. Report from Kunnskapssenteret no. 6−2005. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, 2005. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services summarizes and disseminates evidence concerning the effect of treatments, methods, and interventions in health services, in addition to monitoring health service quality. Our goal is to support good decision making in order to provide patients in Norway with the best possible care. The Centre is organized under The Norwegian Directorate for Health, but is scientifically and professionally independent. The Centre has no authority to develop health policy or responsibility to implement policies. We would like to thank all contributers for their expertise in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Roc Background Document: Tobacco Smoking
    FINAL Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Environmental Tobacco Smoke December 2 - 3, 1998 Meeting of the NTP Board of Scientific Counselors Report on Carcinogens Subcommittee Prepared for the: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Services National Toxicology Program Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 Prepared by: Technology Planning and Management Corporation Canterbury Hall, Suite 310 4815 Emperor Boulevard Durham, NC 27703 Contract Number NOI-ES-85421 RoC Background Document for Environmental Tobacco Smoke Table of Contents Summary Statement..................................................................................................................v 1 Physical and Chemical Properties ......................................................................................1 1.1 Chemical Identification...........................................................................................1 2 Human Exposure.................................................................................................................9 2.1 Biomarkers of Exposure..........................................................................................9 2.1.1 Nicotine and Cotinine...............................................................................9 2.1.2 Carbon Monoxide and Carboxyhemoglobin ...........................................10 2.1.3 Thioethers ..............................................................................................10 2.1.4 Thiocyanate............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Contamination of Packaged Smokeless Tobacco Sold in India
    Research Paper Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Bacterial contamination of packaged smokeless tobacco sold in India Rashmi Mehra1, Vikrant Mohanty1, Aswini Y. Balappanavar1, Shivam Kapoor1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION About 21.4% of India’s population uses smokeless tobacco products (SLT), yet limited data are available on their microbial contamination. To AFFILIATION understand the potential microbiological risks associated with SLT use, the 1 Department of Public Health present study aims to investigate bacterial contamination of tobacco and the Dentistry, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, types of microbes that could be cultured from SLT products. India METHODS Twenty-two brands of SLT products, including paan masala, khaini, gutka and tobacco-containing dentifrices were examined and cultured by using CORRESPONDENCE TO Rashmi Mehra. Department of appropriate selective and differential media including MacConkey agar and CLED Public Health Dentistry, Maulana agar. This was followed by a sequence of further identification by biochemical Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India. tests. E-mail: [email protected] RESULTS All 22 types of SLT products showed growth of aerobic bacteria. The most KEYWORDS common bacteria isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa followed by Streptococcus contamination, bacteria, faecalis. Other bacteria that were isolated from products, in traces, included toxicology, smokeless tobacco, Klebsiella spp., E. coli, and Bacillus subtilus. tobacco constituents CONCLUSIONS This study raises and
    [Show full text]