DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment for a Rule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment for a Rule Environmental Assessment for a Rule to Implement Decisions of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission for: Fishing Restrictions regarding the Oceanic Whitetip Shark, the Whale Shark, and the Silky Shark Prepared by: National Marine Fisheries Service Pacific Islands Regional Office Contact Information: Dr. Charles Karnella, International Fisheries Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Regional Office NOAA Inouye Regional Center 1845 Wasp Boulevard, Building 176 Honolulu, HI 96818 Tel: (808) 725-5000 Fax: (808) 725-5215 E-mail: [email protected] RIN 0648-BD44 July 2014 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | National Marine Fisheries Service List of Abbreviations and Acronyms CCM Commission Members, Cooperating Non-Members, and Participating Territories CCAMLR Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CMM Conservation and Management Measure CNMI Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands CNPO Central North Pacific Ocean CPUE Catch per Unit of Effort Convention Convention on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Convention Area Area of Application of the Convention on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid DPS Distinct Population Segment EA Environmental Assessment EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EFH Essential Fish Habitat ENSO El Niño – Southern Oscillation EPO Eastern Pacific Ocean ESA Endangered Species Act FAD Fish Aggregating Device FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FEP Fishery Ecosystem Plan FFA Forum Fisheries Agency FMP Fishery Management Plan GFCM General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean HAPC Habitat Areas of Particular Concern HMS Highly Migratory Species IATTC Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission ICCAT International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas IOPA Sharks International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks 2 IOTC Indian Ocean Tuna Commission IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act MSA Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act NAFO Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization NEAFC North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NWR National Wildlife Refuge NWSAA National Wildlife System Administration Act of 1966 Pelagics FEP Fishery Ecosystem Plan for Pacific Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region PNA Parties to the Nauru Agreement RFMO Regional Fishery Management Organization ROP Regional Observer Programme RPL Regional Purse Seine Logsheet SCA Shark Conservation Act of 2010 SEAFO South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization SFPA Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000 SPC Secretariat of the Pacific Community SPTA South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 SPTT or Treaty South Pacific Tuna Treaty (formally, the Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States of America) SST Sea Surface Temperature USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UV Ultraviolet Radiation WCPFC Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, also known as the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission WCPFCIA Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act WCPO Western and Central Pacific Ocean WPFMC Western Pacific Fishery Management Council 3 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 1 Introduction and Purpose and Need .............................................................................. 9 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................ 12 1.3 Organization of This Document .......................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................................................................ 14 2.1 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Alternatives Considered in Detail ....................................................................................... 15 2.3 Alternatives Excluded from Detailed Analysis ................................................................... 16 Chapter 3 Affected Environment .................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Overview of Sharks and International Fisheries ................................................................. 17 3.2 U.S. Fisheries in the WCPO and Sharks ............................................................................. 18 3.2.1 U.S. WCPO Purse Seine Fishery .................................................................................. 19 3.2.2 U.S. WCPO Longline Fisheries .................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Hawaii Troll Fishery ..................................................................................................... 28 3.2.4 Guam Troll Fishery ...................................................................................................... 29 3.2.5 American Samoa Troll Fishery..................................................................................... 30 3.2.6 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Troll Fishery .................................. 31 3.2.7 Other WCPO HMS fisheries ........................................................................................ 32 3.3 Sharks in the WCPO ........................................................................................................... 33 3.3.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.2 Focus Species ............................................................................................................... 34 3.3.3 Current Conservation Concerns and Measures ............................................................ 48 3.3.4 Recent U.S. Shark Management Measures .................................................................. 53 4 3.3.5 Post Release Survival Rates ......................................................................................... 54 3.4 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................... 55 3.4.1 Oceanography ............................................................................................................... 55 3.4.2 Climate Change ............................................................................................................ 57 3.4.3 Habitat Change ............................................................................................................. 58 3.5 Biological Environment ...................................................................................................... 58 3.5.1 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function .......................................................................... 59 3.5.2 Target Stocks ................................................................................................................ 61 3.6 Protected Resources ............................................................................................................ 62 3.6.1 Threatened and Endangered Species ............................................................................ 62 3.6.2 Marine Mammals .......................................................................................................... 64 3.6.3 Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) ........................................................................................ 65 3.6.4 National Wildlife Refuges and Monuments ................................................................. 67 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................... 68 4.1 The U.S. WCPO Purse Seine Fishery ................................................................................. 68 4.1.1 Alternative A: No-Action Alternative .......................................................................... 68 4.1.2 Alternative B: The Action Alternative ......................................................................... 69 4.2 The Hawaii-based Deep-set Longline Fishery ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11 the Biology and Ecology of the Oceanic Whitetip Shark, Carcharhinus Longimanus
    Chapter 11 The Biology and Ecology of the Oceanic Whitetip Shark, Carcharhinus longimanus Ramón Bonfi l, Shelley Clarke and Hideki Nakano Abstract The oceanic whitetip shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) is a common circumtropical preda- tor and is taken as bycatch in many oceanic fi sheries. This summary of its life history, dis- tribution and abundance, and fi shery-related information is supplemented with unpublished data taken during Japanese tuna research operations in the Pacifi c Ocean. Oceanic whitetips are moderately slow-growing sharks that do not appear to have differential growth rates by sex, and individuals in the Atlantic and Pacifi c Oceans seem to grow at similar rates. They reach sexual maturity at approximately 170–200 cm total length (TL), or 4–7 years of age, and have a 9- to 12-month embryonic development period. Pupping and nursery areas are thought to exist in the central Pacifi c, between 0ºN and 15ºN. According to two demographic metrics, the resilience of C. longimanus to fi shery exploitation is similar to that of blue and shortfi n mako sharks. Nevertheless, reported oceanic whitetip shark catches in several major longline fi sheries represent only a small fraction of total shark catches, and studies in the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico suggest that this species has suffered signifi cant declines in abundance. Stock assessment has been severely hampered by the lack of species-specifi c catch data in most fi sheries, but recent implementation of species-based reporting by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and some of its member countries will provide better data for quantitative assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharks in Crisis: a Call to Action for the Mediterranean
    REPORT 2019 SHARKS IN CRISIS: A CALL TO ACTION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN WWF Sharks in the Mediterranean 2019 | 1 fp SECTION 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Written and edited by WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative / Evan Jeffries (www.swim2birds.co.uk), based on data contained in: Bartolí, A., Polti, S., Niedermüller, S.K. & García, R. 2018. Sharks in the Mediterranean: A review of the literature on the current state of scientific knowledge, conservation measures and management policies and instruments. Design by Catherine Perry (www.swim2birds.co.uk) Front cover photo: Blue shark (Prionace glauca) © Joost van Uffelen / WWF References and sources are available online at www.wwfmmi.org Published in July 2019 by WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative as the copyright owner. © Text 2019 WWF. All rights reserved. Our thanks go to the following people for their invaluable comments and contributions to this report: Fabrizio Serena, Monica Barone, Adi Barash (M.E.C.O.), Ioannis Giovos (iSea), Pamela Mason (SharkLab Malta), Ali Hood (Sharktrust), Matthieu Lapinksi (AILERONS association), Sandrine Polti, Alex Bartoli, Raul Garcia, Alessandro Buzzi, Giulia Prato, Jose Luis Garcia Varas, Ayse Oruc, Danijel Kanski, Antigoni Foutsi, Théa Jacob, Sofiane Mahjoub, Sarah Fagnani, Heike Zidowitz, Philipp Kanstinger, Andy Cornish and Marco Costantini. Special acknowledgements go to WWF-Spain for funding this report. KEY CONTACTS Giuseppe Di Carlo Director WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative Email: [email protected] Simone Niedermueller Mediterranean Shark expert Email: [email protected] Stefania Campogianni Communications manager WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative Email: [email protected] WWF is one of the world’s largest and most respected independent conservation organizations, with more than 5 million supporters and a global network active in over 100 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Fishes 2000 a Modern Taxonomic Checklist
    This document replaces and supercedes all previous Mediterranean taxonomic checklists issued in the MediterraneanMediterranean Calypso series. FishesFishes This document is also available on disk in several formats 20002000 Calypso have been aided in this project by A Modern Taxonomic many eminent researchers whose Checklist contributions are recognised in the Preface A Listing of all species recorded on the Calypso Ichthyological Database for the Mediterranean Area (010) including all Lessepsian migrants. ISBN: 0 906301 82 3 Mediterranean Fishes 2000 A Modern Taxonomic Checklist This document replaces and supercedes all previous Mediterranean taxonomic checklists issued in the Calypso series. ISBN: 0 906301 82 3 . Year 2000 A Listing of all species recorded on the Calypso Ichthyological Database for the Mediterranean Area (010) including all Lessepsian migrants. Calypso have been aided in this project by many eminent researchers whose contributions are recognised in the Preface Copyright.Calypso Publications.London British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library This title is also available on Interactive disk or by Internet Subscription Contact the publishers by Email: [email protected] INDEX Please note: This Index has been designed for use with the Adobe PDF file of which it is a component. Page numbers on the viewed enlarged pages may differ or not be shown, as these have been transferred from the printed texts 2. Bibliographic data 3. Preface 4. Bibliography of Lessepsian Migrants 8. A Word Regarding the Calypso Taxonomic System 11. Database Area Codings 13. The Calypso Database Numbering System 15. Mediterranean Recorded Species 151 Some additions to the record 152 Professor Golani’s data on Lessepsian migrants 154 – 306 Mediterranean Fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Monsters in Antiquity: a Classical and Zoological Investigation
    Sea Monsters in Antiquity: A Classical and Zoological Investigation Alexander L. Jaffe Harvard University Dept. of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Class of 2015 Abstract: Sea monsters inspired both fascination and fear in the minds of the ancients. In this paper, I aim to examine several traditional monsters of antiquity with a multi-faceted approach that couples classical background with modern day zoological knowledge. Looking at the examples of the ketos and the sea serpent in Roman and Greek societies, I evaluate the scientific bases for representations of these monsters across of variety of media, from poetry to ceramics. Through the juxtaposition of the classical material and modern science, I seek to gain a greater understanding of the ancient conception of sea monsters and explain the way in which they were rationalized and depicted by ancient cultures. A closer look at extant literature, historical accounts, and artwork also helps to reveal a human sentiment towards the ocean and its denizens penetrating through time even into the modern day. “The Sea-monsters, mighty of limb and huge, the wonders of the sea, heavy with strength invincible, a terror for the eyes to behold and ever armed with deadly rage—many of these there be that roam the spacious seas...”1 Oppian, Halieutica 1 As the Greek poet Oppian so eloquently reveals, sea monsters inspired both fascination and fear in the minds of the ancients. From the Old Testament to Ovid, sources from throughout the ancient world show authors exercising both imagination and observation in the description of these creatures. Mythology as well played a large role in the creation of these beliefs, with such classic examples as Perseus and Andromeda or Herakles and Hesione.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalloped Hammerhead Shark (Sphyrna Lewini) 2014-2019 Bibliography
    Scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) 2014-2019 Bibliography Trevor Riley, Head of Public Services, NOAA Central Library NCRL subject guide 2019-09 https://doi.org/10.25923/79kf-v153 September 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research NOAA Central Library – Silver Spring, Maryland Table of Contents Background & Scope ................................................................................................................................. 3 Sources Reviewed ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Section I: Biology and Life History ............................................................................................................. 4 Section II: Genetics .................................................................................................................................. 17 Section III: Population Abundance .......................................................................................................... 20 Section IV: Threats .................................................................................................................................. 28 2 Background & Scope Scalloped hammerhead sharks are moderately large sharks with a global distribution. The most distinguishing characteristic of this shark is its "hammer-shaped" head. They are threatened by commercial fishing, mainly for the shark fin trade. Two distinct
    [Show full text]
  • Range Expansion of the Whitenose Shark, Nasolamia Velox, and Migratory Movements to the Oceanic Revillagigedo Archipelago
    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, page 1 of 5. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2017 doi:10.1017/S0025315417000108 Range expansion of the whitenose shark, Nasolamia velox, and migratory movements to the oceanic Revillagigedo Archipelago (west Mexico) frida lara-lizardi1,2, mauricio hoyos-padilla2,3, james t. ketchum2,4 and felipe galva’ n-magan~a1 1Instituto Polite´cnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Av. IPN s/n. C.P. 23096. La Paz, B.C.S, Mexico, 2Pelagios-Kakunja´ A. C. 1540 Sinaloa, C.P. 23070, La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico, 3Fins Attached, 19675 Still Glen Way, Colorado Springs, CO 80908, USA, 4Centro de Investigaciones Biolo´gicas del Noroeste, Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, 23096 La Paz, B.C.S, Mexico Current literature considers that Nasolamia velox has a limited distribution along the coastline of the Eastern Pacific with sporadic sightings in the Galapagos Archipelago. This study provides evidence of the occurrence of this species at the Revillagigedo Archipelago (18899′186′′N 112808′44′′W), Mexico, using acoustic telemetry and videos taken from 2014 to 2016. We report here movements from a coastal location (National Park Cabo Pulmo) to a group of oceanic islands (Revillagigedo Archipelago) by one single individual, supporting the idea of the potential connectivity of sharks between the Gulf of California and the Revillagigedo Archipelago. This report extends the known distribution of N. velox to 400 km off the mainland coast of the Americas, thereby increasing the knowledge of the distribution of a species commonly reported in fishery landings of the Eastern Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay to Detect Illegal Trade of CITES-Listed
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Multiplex real-time PCR assay to detect illegal trade of CITES-listed shark species Received: 29 March 2018 Diego Cardeñosa 1,2, Jessica Quinlan3, Kwok Ho Shea4 & Demian D. Chapman3 Accepted: 23 October 2018 The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a Published: xx xx xxxx multilateral environmental agreement to ensure that the international trade of threatened species is either prohibited (Appendix I listed species) or being conducted legally, sustainably, and transparently (Appendix II listed species). Twelve threatened shark species exploited for their fns, meat, and other products have been listed under CITES Appendix II. Sharks are often traded in high volumes, some of their products are visually indistinguishable, and most importing/exporting nations have limited capacity to detect illicit trade and enforce the regulations. High volume shipments often must be screened after only a short period of detainment (e.g., a maximum of 24 hours), which together with costs and capacity issues have limited the use of DNA approaches to identify illicit trade. Here, we present a reliable, feld-based, fast (<4 hours), and cost efective ($0.94 USD per sample) multiplex real- time PCR protocol capable of detecting nine of the twelve sharks listed under CITES in a single reaction. This approach facilitates detection of illicit trade, with positive results providing probable cause to detain shipments for more robust forensic analysis. We also provide evidence of its application in real law enforcement scenarios in Hong Kong. Adoption of this approach can help parties meet their CITES requirements, avoiding potential international trade sanctions in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Crestfish Lophotus Lacepede (Giorna, 1809) and Scalloped Ribbonfish Zu Cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) in the Northern Coast of Sicily, Italy
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER AADRAY 58(1): 137 - 146, 2017 Occurrence of two rare species from order Lampriformes: Crestfish Lophotus lacepede (Giorna, 1809) and scalloped ribbonfish Zu cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) in the northern coast of Sicily, Italy Fabio FALSONE1, Michele Luca GERACI1, Danilo SCANNELLA1, Charles Odilichukwu R. OKPALA1, Giovan Battista GIUSTO1, Mar BOSCH-BELMAR2, Salvatore GANCITANO1 and Gioacchino BONO1 1Institute for the Coastal Marine Environment, IAMC‑CNR, 91026 Mazara del Vallo, Sicily, Italy 2Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze del Mare (CoNISMa), Rome, Italy Corresponding author, e‑mail: [email protected] The bony fish Lophotus lacepede (Giorna, 1809) and Zu cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) are the two species rarely recorded within the Mediterranean basin, usually reported as accidentally captured in depth (mesopelagic) fishing operations. In the current work, we present the first record of L. lacepede and Z. cristatus in fishing catches from southwestern Tyrrhenian Sea. Moreover, in order to improve existent biological/ecological knowledge, some bio-related aspects such as feeding aspect, sexual maturity and age estimate have been discussed. Key words: crestfish, scalloped ribbonfish, meristic features, vertebrae, growth ring INTRODUCTION species of Lophotidae family, the L. lacepede inhabits the epipelagic zone, although it could The target species of this study (Lophotus also be recorded in most oceans from the surface lacepede and Zu cristatus) belong to Lophotidae up to 1000 m depth (HEEMSTRA, 1986; PALMER, (Bonaparte, 1845) and Trachipteridae (Swain- 1986; OLNEY, 1999). First record of this spe- son, 1839) families respectively, including the cies in the Mediterranean Basin was from the Lampriformes order (consisted of 7 families).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark
    A Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) as an Endangered, or Alternatively as a Threatened, Species Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act and for the Concurrent Designation of Critical Habitat Oceanic whitetip shark (used with permission from Andy Murch/Elasmodiver.com). Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce acting through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Marine Fisheries Service September 21, 2015 By: Defenders of Wildlife1 535 16th Street, Suite 310 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: (720) 943-0471 (720) 942-0457 [email protected] [email protected] 1 Defenders of Wildlife would like to thank Courtney McVean, a law student at the University of Denver, Sturm college of Law, for her substantial research and work preparing this Petition. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. GOVERNING PROVISIONS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ............................................. 5 A. Species and Distinct Population Segments ....................................................................... 5 B. Significant Portion of the Species’ Range ......................................................................... 6 C. Listing Factors ....................................................................................................................... 7 D. 90-Day and 12-Month Findings ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I0038 3872 117 3 Cov.Pdf (667.9Kb)
    ISSN 0038-3872 CONTENTS Mortality of Native and Non-native Fishes during Artificial Breaching of Coastal Lagoons in Southern and Central California. Camm C. Swift, Joel Mulder, Chris Dellith, and Kristen Kittleson ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 157 California Records of the Oarfish, Regalecus russelii (Cuvier, 1816) (Actinopterygii: Regalecidae). Richard F. Feeney and Robert N. Lea ----------------------------------------------- 169 Asemichthys taylori Gilbert, 1912, Spinynose Sculpin, New to the California Marine Fauna. Milton S. Love, Gregory C. Jensen, and Kevin Lee ----------------------------------- 180 The Panamic Fanged Blenny, Ophioblennius steindachneri Jordan & Evermann, 1898, New to California Marine Waters with a Key to the California Species of Blenniidae. Milton S. Love, William B. Bushing, and William Power ---------- 184 Volume 117 Number 3 Where the Weird Things are: A Collection of Species Range Extensions in the Southern California Bight. Jonathan P. Williams, Chelsea M. Williams, Carol A. Blanchette, Jeremy T. Claisse, Daniel J. Pondella, II, and Jennifer E. Caselle ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 189 Cover: SEM image of spicules from a Mitten sponge (Trikentrion helium). Photo by J.P. Williams. 117(3) 157-202 (2018) December 2018 Southern California Academy of Sciences Founded 6 November 1891, incorporated 17 May 1907 q Southern California Academy of Sciences, 2018 2018–2019
    [Show full text]
  • Coelho Phd Lantern S
    UNIVERSIDADEdo ALGARVE FaculdadedeCiênciasdoMaredo Ambiente Biology,populationdynamics,managementandconservation ofdeepwaterlanternsharks,Etmopterusspinax and Etmopteruspusillus (Chondrichthyes:Etmopteridae)insouthernPortugal(northeastAtlantic). (DoutoramentoemCiênciaseTecnologiasdasPescas,especialidadedeBiologiaPesqueira) (ThesisforthedegreeinDoctorofPhilosophyinFisheriesSciencesandTechnologies,specialtyinFisheriesBiology) RUIPEDROANDRADECOELHO Faro (2007) UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE Biology, population dynamics, management and conservation of deep water lantern sharks, Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) in southern Portugal (northeast Atlantic). (Doutoramento em Ciências e Tecnologias das Pescas, especialidade de Biologia Pesqueira) (Thesis for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries Sciences and Technologies, specialty in Fisheries Biology) RUI PEDRO ANDRADE COELHO Orientador / Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini Júri / Jury: - Prof. Doutor José Pedro Andrade, Professor Catedrático da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini, Professor Associado com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Leonel Paulo Sul de Serrano Gordo, Professor Auxiliar com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa; - Prof. Doutor Manuel Seixas Afonso Dias, Professor Auxiliar da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve;
    [Show full text]
  • The Kerguelen Plateau: Marine Ecosystem + Fisheries
    THE KERGUELEN PLATEAU: MARINE ECOSYSTEM + FISHERIES Proceedings of the Second Symposium Kerguelen plateau Marine Ecosystems & Fisheries • SYMPOSIUM 2017 heardisland.antarctica.gov.au/research/kerguelen-plateau-symposium Shark by-catch observed in the bottom longline fishery off the Kerguelen Islands in 2006–2016, with a focus on the traveller lantern shark (Etmopterus viator) Charlotte Chazeau1, Samuel P. Iglésias2, Clara Péron1, Nicolas Gasco1, Alexis Martin1 and Guy Duhamel1 1 Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Adaptations du vivant, UMR 7208 BOREA (MNHN, CNRS, IRD, Sorbonne Université, UCBN), CP 26, 43 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France 2 Institut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Station Marine de Concarneau, Place de la Croix, 29900 Concarneau, France Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Data collected by fishery observers on board French fishing vessels targeting Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), were examined to quantify and describe shark by-catch within the Kerguelen exclusive economic zone (EEZ). From 2006 to 2016, the fishing crews of longline vessels reported the total catches of the line and observers were asked to identify and count fish by-catch on 25% of the total fishing effort. A total of 26 203 longline hauls and more than 55 million hooks were checked by observers reporting 29 500 individual sharks caught as by-catch. Four shark species were identified (traveller lantern shark – Etmopterus viator, southern sleeper shark – Somniosus antarcticus, Portuguese dogfish – Centroscymnus coelolepis and porbeagle shark – Lamna nasus) among which E. viator was numerically largely dominant (99%). Relative abundance (number of shark per 1 000 hooks observed) calculated for sets with sharks present, was used to show bathymetric and geographical distributions and biological data were analysed.
    [Show full text]