Planning Committee

Date: Thursday, 26 November 2015 Time: 6.00 pm

Venue: Committee Room 1 - Town Hall

Contact Officer: Vicky Rainsford Tel: 0151 691 8271 e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.wirral.gov.uk

1. MINUTES (Pages 1 - 16)

To approve the accuracy of the minutes of the meeting held on 21 October 15.

2. MEMBERS' CODE OF CONDUCT - DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Members of the committee are asked whether they have any personal or prejudicial interests in connection with any application on the agenda and, if so, to declare them and state the nature of the interest.

3. REQUESTS FOR SITE VISITS

Members are asked to request all site visits before any application is considered.

4. APP/15/00398: 11 SEABANK ROAD, EGREMONT, CH44 0EE - CHANGE OF USE TO HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY - 6 BEDROOM PROPERTY INCREASING TO 7 BEDROOMS WITH INTERNAL ALTERATIONS (Pages 17 - 22)

5. OUT/15/00977: GRAZING LAND, ROAD, - OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR 10 DWELLINGS (Pages 23 - 32)

6. APP/15/00979: LAND NORTH WEST TO 1 THE KNAP, GAYTON, CH60 0EX - PROPOSED NEW 2 BED DORMER PROPERTY ON LAND AT 1 THE KNAP (Pages 33 - 40) 7. APP/15/00983: CHESTNUT HOUSE, KINGS DRIVE, , CH48 2JF - RE-DESIGN OF EXISTING DWELLING WITH PROPOSED EXTENSIONS TO INCLUDE A NEW SWIMMING POOL, GYMNASIUM, HABITABLE SPACES. PROPOSED EXTERNAL WORKS AND RE-MODEL OF THE ELEVATIONS AND NEW EXTERNAL DETACHED DOUBLE GARAGE AND LANDSCAPING WORKS. (Pages 41 - 50)

8. APP/15/01040: CLEARED SITE GRASSED ADJACENT 54, OLD ROAD, , CH41 8BL - ERECTION OF THREE DWELLINGS (Pages 51 - 56)

9. APP/15/01087: SERVICE STATION, 152 KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ - DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING SERVICE STATION, AND REDEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE A NEW PETROL FILLING STATION FACILITY, COMPRISING OF CANOPY/FORECOURT, SALES BUILDING WITH ATM, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS, ASSOCIATED PARKING, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER ANCILLARY WORKS. (Pages 57 - 66)

10. APP/15/01143: 78 DAWSTONE ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 8ND - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING DWELLING AND CONSTRUCTION OF TWO DETACHED DWELLINGS. AMENDMENT TO PREVIOUSLY WITHDRAWN APPLICATION REF APP/15/00061 (Pages 67 - 72)

11. APP/15/01166: DALESIDE NURSING HOME, 136-138 BEBINGTON ROAD, , CH42 4QB - FIRST FLOOR EXTENSION TO PROVIDE THREE BEDROOMS (AMENDED PROPOSAL) (Pages 73 - 78)

12. APP/15/01174: AMENITY OPEN SPACE, ST NICHOLAS ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE - CHANGE OF USE TO RESIDENTIAL GARDEN (Pages 79 - 84)

13. APP/15/01182: THE LYDIATE, , WIRRAL, , CH60 8PR - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR TWO DETACHED DWELLINGS WITH DETACHED GARAGES INCLUDING ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING WORKS (Pages 85 - 92)

14. APP/15/01202: 50 EGERTON ROAD, CLAUGHTON, CH43 1UJ - DOUBLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION, RAISED BALCONY AND GARAGE CONVERSION TO ANNEXE ROOM (Pages 93 - 96)

15. APP/15/01235: 2 SHELLEY WAY, , CH48 3LQ - RETENTION OF GARDEN PAVILION/SUMMER HOUSE (RESUBMISSION OF APP/14/01323) (Pages 97 - 102)

16. APP/15/01320: BARNCROFT, LARCHWOOD CLOSE, ,WIRRAL - 21 EXTRA CARE APARTMENTS INCLUDING SUPPORT FACILITIES, CAR PARKING AND LANDSCAPED GARDENS (Pages 103 - 110) 17. PROPOSED ADOPTION FOR THE LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER FOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSE THAT ARE GRADE II LISTED IN VILLAGE CONSERVTION AREA (Pages 111 - 206)

18. PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS BETWEEN 12/10/2015 AND 12/11/2015 (Pages 207 - 232)

19. ANY OTHER URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE CHAIR

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Present: Councillor A Leech (Chair)

Councillors D Realey D Elderton M Daniel E Boult S Foulkes K Hodson J Walsh D Mitchell I Williams P Cleary

Deputies: Councillors C Muspratt (for P Brightmore) W Clements (for P Hayes)

86 MINUTES

The Strategic Director for Transformation and Resources submitted the minutes of the meeting held on 17 September 2015.

Councillor P Cleary identified an inaccuracy in minute 77 and suggested that the vote should have been recorded as 11:1 and not 12:0.

Resolved – That subject to the above amendment, the minutes be approved.

87 MEMBERS' CODE OF CONDUCT - DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Councillor Christina Muspratt declared a prejudicial interest in respect of item 12 by virtue of her membership of Merseyside Cycle Forum

Councillor Steve Foulkes declared a prejudicial interest in respect of item 10 by virtue of him being a board member of Magenta Living

Councillor Anita Leech declared a prejudicial interest in respect of item 10 by virtue of her previous involvement with the application.

Councillor Wendy Clements declared a personal interest in respect of item 12 by virtue of her membership of Merseyside Cycle Forum.

88 REQUESTS FOR SITE VISITS

Members were asked to submit requests for site visits before any applications were considered.

The following requests were unanimously approved: APP/15/00398: 11 SEABANK ROAD, EGREMOUNT, CH44 0EE – CHANGE OF USE TO HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY – 6 BEDROOM PROPERTY INCREASING 7 BEDROOMS WITH INTERNAL ALTERATIONS.

OUT/15/00977: GRAZING LAND, LEASOWE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE – OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR 10 DWELLINGS

APP/15/00979: LAND NORTH WEST TO 1 THE KNAP, GAYTON, CH60 0EX – PROPOSED NEW 2 BED DORMER PROPERTY ON LAND AT 1 THE KNAP.

89 ORDER OF BUSINESS

The Chair agreed to vary the order of business.

90 APP/15/00398: 11 SEABANK ROAD, EGREMONT, CH44 0EE - CHANGE OF USE TO HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY - 6 BEDROOM PROPERTY INCREASING 7 BEDROOMS WITH INTERNAL ALTERATIONS

Resolved – That consideration of this item be deferred for a formal site visit.

91 APP/15/00952: CAMMELL LAIRD, CAMPBELTOWN ROAD, TRANMERE, CH41 9BP - FULL PLANNING APPLICATION FOR A PROPOSED CREW TRANSFER AND STORAGE FACILITY.

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted the above application for consideration.

On a motion by Councillor Walsh and seconded by Councillor Realey it was:

Resolved (13:0) That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

2. A lighting plan and light spill plan must be submitted for agreement with the Council to show how the applicant will reduce light spill onto the intertidal areas. In addition, the proposed illumination shall be shielded away from the highway and neighbouring houses in a manner to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority to prevent glare. The shielding shall be retained thereafter

3. The site must be drained on a total separate system, with only foul drainage ultimately connected into the public foul sewerage system

4. All fuel and chemical storage tanks must have adequate bund walls with outlets. The bund must be capable of holding more than the largest tank within it.

5. The Licence Holder must ensure that artificial lighting used to facilitate the construction and operation of the pontoon is directed away from SSSI and Mersey Estuary SPA. The specific locations of the designated sites can be obtained from Natural .

6. Surface water draining from areas of hard standing shall be passed through an oil interceptor or series of oil interceptors, prior to being discharged into any watercourse, soakaway or surface water sewer. The interceptor(s) shall be designed and constructed to have a capacity compatible with the area being drained, shall be installed prior to the occupation of the development and shall thereafter be retained and maintained throughout the lifetime of the development. Clean roof water shall not pass through the interceptor(s). Vehicle washdowns and detergents shall not be passed through the interceptor.

7. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 29th July 2015 and listed as follows: G5229.001, G5229.002, FS/0381024-1 Rev A, FS/0377940- 1 Rev, HFL/2011/0377940-3R Rev A, HFL/2011/0377940-1 Rev H, FS/0381024 - 1 Rev A, FL/2011/0377940-3, IHB/AB/002

92 APP/15/00958: 7-9 ROSE MOUNT, OXTON, CH43 5SG - VARIATION OF CONDITION 3 OF APP/11/00283 (OPENING HOURS): MONDAY TO THURSDAY OPEN AT 09:00, LAST ENTRY 23:30, TRADING TO CEASE 00:00 (MIDNIGHT), PREMISES CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC 00:30; FRIDAYS AND SATURDAYS: OPEN 09:00, LAST ENTRY 23:30, TRADING TO CEASE 01:00 WITH PREMISES CLOSED TO PUBLIC 01:30; SUNDAYS OPEN 09:00, LAST ENTRY 23:00, TRADING TO CEASE AT 23:30 WITH PREMISES CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC AT 00:00 (MIDNIGHT)

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted the above application for consideration.

A Ward Councillor addressed the Committee in opposition to the application.

A Ward Councillor addressed the Committee in support of the application. It was moved by Councillor Mitchell and seconded by Councillor Clements that the application be refused on the following grounds

‘It is considered the proposed variation of condition and resulting later opening hours would result in noise and disturbance later at night that would be detrimental to the amenities neighbouring residents should expect to enjoy at a time when ambient noise levels are lower. As such the application is considered contrary to policies HS15 and SH4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan, Supplementary Planning Document 3 (Hot Food Takeaways, Restaurants, Cafes and Drinking Establishments) and the National Planning Policy Framework.’

The motion was put and lost (4:9)

It was then moved by Councillor Realey and seconded by Councillor Hodson and

Resolved (9:4) that the application be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. The premises shall be closed between 00.30 hours (midnight) and 09.00 hours Monday to Thursday, 01.30 hours and 09.00 Fridays and Saturdays and 00.00 (midnight) hours and 09.00 hours on Sundays.

2. All windows and doors must be kept closed at all times, except for access and egress.

3. No live or amplified music, other than low level background music which must not be audible from beyond the site boundary shall be played at the premises at any time.

4. The public shall not be granted entry into the premises after 23.30 Monday to Saturday or after 23:00 on Sunday.

5. This permission is for a temporary period and shall expire after 12 months, starting from the date of this grant of approval.

93 OUT/15/00977: GRAZING LAND, LEASOWE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE - OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR 10 DWELLINGS

Resolved – That consideration of this item be deferred for a formal site visit 94 APP/15/00979: LAND NORTH WEST TO 1 THE KNAP, GAYTON, CH60 0EX - PROPOSED NEW 2 BED DORMER PROPERTY ON LAND AT 1 THE KNAP

Resolved – That consideration of this item be deferred for a formal site visit.

95 APP/15/00984: FLAYBRICK HILL RESERVOIR, BOUNDARY ROAD, BIDSTON, CH43 7PE - THE DEVELOPMENT IS FOR 6, 4 BEDROOM FAMILY DWELLINGS, DISTRIBUTED EVENLY ACROSS THE SITE. THE HOUSES ARE ARRANGED TO ALLOW VIEWS OF THE EXISTING FLAYBRICK RESERVOIR WATER TOWER FROM HILL ROAD.

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted the above application for consideration.

A Petitioner addressed the Committee

The Applicant addressed the Committee

A Ward Councillor addressed the Committee

It was moved by Councillor Mitchell and seconded by Councillor Elderton and

Resolved (12:1) That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

2. Before any construction commences, samples of the facing/roofing/window materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development.

3. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2008 (or any subsequent Order or statutory provision revoking or re-enacting the provisions of that Order), no garages, outbuildings or other extensions to a dwelling shall be erected unless expressly authorised.

4. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2008 (or any subsequent Order or statutory provision re-enacting or revoking the provisions of that Order), no window or dormer window shall be added to the property unless expressly authorised. 5. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2008 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting that Order) no external alterations or extensions shall be carried out to the building(s) hereby approved.

6. The area(s) so designated within the site shall be suitably landscaped in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any works commence on site, the landscape work to be completed during the first available planting season following completion of the development hereby approved and shall be maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

7. No development shall take place until details of any gates, walls and fences to be erected as part of the proposed development have been submitted to and approved by Local Planning Authority. Any gates, walls and fences comprised in the approved details shall be erected prior to the first occupation of any of the approved dwellings.

8. All driveways shall be generally formed and hard-surfaced to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority before any of the dwellings to which they relate are occupied.

9. Before the development hereby permitted is first commenced, a datum for measuring land levels shall be agreed in writing. Full details of existing and proposed ground levels and proposed finished floor levels shall be taken from that datum and submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, notwithstanding any such detail shown on previously submitted plan(s). The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and retained as such thereafter.

10. No development shall take place until an assessment is carried out in accordance with authoritative technical guidance (CLR11), has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. If any contamination posing unacceptable risks is then found, a report specifying the measures to be taken to remediate the site to render it suitable for the approved use shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The site shall be remediated in accordance with the approved measures and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. If, during the course of development, any contamination posing unacceptable risks is found, which has not been previously identified, additional measures for the remediation of the land shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The remediation of the site shall incorporate the approved additional measures and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

11. No development shall take place until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re- used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

12. Prior to the first occupation of the dwellings arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the local planning authority. the approved details shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority.

13. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 28th July 2015 and listed as follows: L(02)004 P02 (Dated 07.10.15), L(04)001 P07 (Dated 10.07.15), L(04)002 (Dated 10.07.15), L(04)003 (Dated 10.07.15), L(04)004 P07 (Dated 10.07.15), L(05)002 (Dated 10.07.15), L(04)005 (Dated 10.07.15), L(05)005 (Dated 10.07.15), L(05)004 (Dated 10.07.15), L(05)003 (Dated 10.07.15), L(02)002 (Dated 10.07.15), L(02)001 (Dated 10.07.15), L(04)006 (Dated 10.07.15), L(05)006 P07 (Dated 10.07.15), L(06)001 (Dated 10.07.15) & L(02)003 (Dated 10.07.15)

14. No development shall take place until a scheme of works for the improvement of the vehicular access to the site from Boundary Road has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall include the provision of pedestrian dropped kerbs and tactile paving. The development shall not be first occupied until the works have been completed as agreed with the Local Planning Authority.

96 APP/15/01101: MELROSE & THORNRIDGE HEIGHTS, STAVORDALE ROAD, MORETON - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING VACANT GARAGES AND REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WITH 38 NO. HOUSES AND FLATS. Having previously declared a prejudicial interest in respect of this item, Councillors Foulkes and Leech left the room during consideration of this application.

Councillor Denise Realey, Deputy Chair of the Planning Committee took the Chair for consideration of this item only.

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted the above application for consideration.

A Petitioner addressed the Committee.

The Agent addressed the Committee.

A Ward Councillor addressed the Committee

On a motion by Councillor Hodson and seconded by Councillor Clements it was:

Resolved (11:0) That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

2. Prior to the commencement of development, a scheme for the provision of affordable housing to be provided, shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall include the occupancy criteria to be used in determining the identity of prospective and successive occupier of the affordable housing and the means by which such occupancy can be enforced. The approved scheme shall be implemented in full and in perpetuity unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

3. Prior to the commencement of development a Construction Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The provisions of the Construction Management Plan shall be implemented in full during the period of construction and shall not be varied unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

4. No development shall take place until details of secure covered cycle parking and/or storage facilities have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. These facilities shall be provided in accordance with the approved details and made available for use prior to the first use of the development hereby permitted and shall be retained for use at all times thereafter.

5. No development shall take place before details of a scheme of landscaping, which shall include details of both hard and soft landscaping works and earthworks, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme as approved shall be carried out in the first planting season following the completion of development. Any trees, shrubs or plants that die within a period of five years from the completion of development, or are removed and/or become seriously damaged or diseased in that period, shall be replaced (and if necessary continue to be replaced) in the first available planting season with others of similar size and species, unless the Local Planning Authority gives prior written permission for any variation.

6. No development shall take place before a detailed Method Statement for the protection of the retained trees (section 7, BS5837, the Tree Protection Plan) has been submitted to and approved in writing with the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved method statement. For the avoidance of doubt, the method statement shall include:

A. a schedule of tree works for all the retained trees in paragraphs (a) and (b) above, specifying pruning and other remedial or preventative work, whether for physiological, hazard abatement, aesthetic or operational reasons. All tree works shall be carried out in accordance with BS3998, 1989, Recommendations for tree work.

B. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the Ground Protection Zones (section 9.3 of BS5837).

C. the details and positions of the Tree Protection Barriers (section 9.2 of BS5837), identified separately where required for different phases of construction work (e.g. demolition, construction, hard landscaping). The Tree Protection Barriers must be erected prior to each construction phase commencing and remain in place, and undamaged for the duration of that phase. No works shall take place on the next phase until the Tree Protection Barriers are repositioned for that phase.

D. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the Construction Exclusion Zones (section 9 of BS5837). E. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the underground service runs (section11.7 of BS5837).

F. the details of any changes in levels or the position of any proposed excavations within 5 metres of the Root Protection Area (para. 5.2.2 of BS5837) of any retained tree, including those on neighbouring or nearby ground.

G. the details of any special engineering required to accommodate the protection of retained trees (section10 of BS5837), (e.g. in connection with foundations, bridging, water features, surfacing)

H. the details of the working methods to be employed for the installation of drives and paths within the RPAs of retained trees in accordance with the principles of "No-Dig" construction.

I. the details of the working methods to be employed with regard to the access for and use of heavy, large, difficult to manoeuvre plant (including cranes and their loads, dredging machinery, concrete pumps, piling rigs, etc) on site.

J. the details of the working methods to be employed with regard to site logistics and storage, including an allowance for slopes, water courses and enclosures, with particular regard to ground compaction and phytotoxicity.

K. the details of the method to be employed for the stationing, use and removal of site cabins within any RPA (para. 9.2.3 of BS5837).

L. the details of tree protection measures for the hard landscaping phase (sections 13 and 14 of BS5837).

M. the timing of the various phases of the works or development in the context of the tree protection measures.

7. The materials detailed in submitted materials schedule shall be used in the external construction of this development unless an alternative material has previously been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be retained as such thereafter. 8. No development shall take place before an assessment, carried out in accordance with authoritative technical guidance (CLR11), has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. If any contamination posing unacceptable risks is found, a report specifying the measures to be taken to remediate the site to render it suitable for the approved use shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The site shall be remediated in accordance with the approved measures and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. If, during the course of development, any contamination posing unacceptable risks is found which has not been previously identified, additional measures for the remediation of this shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The remediation of the site shall incorporate the approved additional measures and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

9. No development shall take place before (and notwithstanding the details included with the approved plans) a plan indicating the positions, design, materials and type of boundary treatment to be erected has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The boundary treatment shall be completed in accordance with a timetable agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

10. No development shall take place before details of the proposed finished floor levels has been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The submitted levels shall be measured against a fixed datum (notwithstanding any such detail shown on previously submitted plans) and shall show the existing and finished ground levels, eaves and ridges heights of surrounding properties. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and retained as such thereafter.

11. The development permitted by this planning permission shall only be carried out in accordance with the submitted Flood Risk Assessment (FRA)January 2013/25835LRD/Sutcliffe and the mitigation measures detailed within that FRA. The mitigation measures shall be fully implemented prior to occupation and subsequently maintained in accordance with the timing/phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme, or within any other period as may be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

12. No development shall take place before a Drainage Impact Study, a surface water drainage scheme for the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The surface water scheme shall be fully implemented before the first use/occupation of the development and be constructed in accordance with the approved details and subsequently maintained in accordance with the timing/phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme or within any other period as may be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

13. No development shall take place before a scheme to manage overland flow due to event exceeding has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall be fully implemented and subsequently maintained in accordance with the timing/phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme or within any other period as may be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

14. No removal of trees/scrubs/hedges or any other vegetation management shall be carried out on site between 1st March to 31st August inclusive in any year, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

15. No development shall take place until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re- used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

16. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 3rd August 2015 and listed as follows:

1631 -SI -12.02 REV I, 1631 -SI -12.04 REV A, 1631 -SI -10 REV A, 1631 -SI - 12.02 REV A, 1631 -SI -12.01 REV A, 1631 -SI -12.04 REV A, 1631 -SI -12.0 REV I, 1631 -SI - 03 REV I, 1631 -SI -10 REV I, 1631 -SI -12.03 REV I, 1631 -SI - 14 REV I, 1632-SI-15, 1632-GA-0 REV I, 1632-0GA-M REV I, 1632-GA-H REV I, 1632-GA-I, 1632-GA-J REV I, 1632-GA-EF REV I, 1632-GA-G REV I, 1632-GA-D REV I, 1632-GA-A REVI, 1632-GA-C/K/L REV I, 1632-GA-B REV I, 25835-661 and the amended site layout drawing 1632-SI-10 REV C received by the Local Planning Authority on 23rd September 2015

17. Construction of the development authorised by this permission shall not begin until the LPA has approved in writing a full scheme of works for the construction of the new highways and amendment of the existing highway made necessary by this development, including new carriageways, footways, street lighting, surface water drainage, traffic signs, road markings, tactile paved pedestrian crossings and access onto Stavordale Road and Fender View Road. The approved works shall be completed in accordance with the LPA written approval and in accordance with a written timetable to be agreed with the LPA prior to commencement of construction.

18. Prior to first occupation or use of the development, arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details previous submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the first occupation of the building.

97 APP/15/01138: 21 GAYTON PARKWAY, GAYTON, CH60 3SZ - PROPOSAL: ERECTION OF NEW DWELLING AT LAND TO THE REAR OF 21 PARKWAY, GAYTON - AMENDED SITE LAYOUT TO THAT AS APPROVED AS APP/15/00064 AND THE ADDITION OF TWO 'JULIET BALCONIES' TO REAR ELEVATION

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted the above application for consideration.

A Petitioner addressed the Committee

The Agent addressed the Committee

On a motion by Councillor Realey and seconded by Councillor Williams it was:

Resolved (10:2: with one abstention) that the application be approved subject to the following conditions:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 12th August 2015 and listed as follows: drawing number 001, dated 5th December 2014, drawing number 002, dated 5th June 2015, drawing number 003, dated 28th July 2015, drawing number 004, dated 28th July 2015.

2. Within 3 months of the date of this permission, samples of the facing, roofing materials and hard standing to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development. 3. Within 3 months of the date of this permission, a landscaping scheme shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and the approved landscape work shall be completed during the first available planting season following completion of the development hereby approved and shall be maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

4. Within 1 month of a the date of this permission a Construction Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The provisions of the Construction Management Plan shall be implemented in full during the remaining period of construction and shall not be varied unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

5. No trees indicated in the approved plan(s) or documentation to be retained shall be cut down, uprooted or destroyed, nor shall any trees be pruned other than in accordance with the approved plans and particulars, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority. Any agreed pruning shall be carried out in accordance with British Standard 3998 (Tree Works).

6. Notwithstanding the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D and Class E of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (or any subsequent Order or statutory provision revoking or re-enacting the provisions of that Order), no garages, outbuildings, or alterations or extensions to the dwelling shall be erected unless expressly authorised.

98 NOTICE OF MOTION - 'BETTER PLANNING TO FACILITATE CYCLING'

Having previously declared a prejudicial interest in respect of this item, Councillor Muspratt left the room during consideration of the motion.

The Chair advised that at the meeting of the Council held on 12 October 2015 (minute 51 refers), the following Notice of Motion proposed by Councillor P Cleary and seconded by Councillor P Gilchrist was referred by the Mayor to this Committee for consideration. Councillor Cleary and Gilchrist were invited to address the Committee to explain the Motion.

Councillor Cleary asked the Council to support the development of facilities for cycling in the interests of improved health, reduced air pollution, less congestion, and more economical travel. In particular, he called upon the Committee to recognise that secure cycle parking/storage facilities are fundamental in facilitating the bicycle as a practical mode of transport for Wirral residents.

Councillor Gilchrist then addressed the Committee to further ask that the Committee supports the motion.

Officers responded to questions by Members regarding cycling provision in planning applications

It was moved by Councillor Cleary and seconded by Councillor Mitchell and

Resolved (12:0)

That the Council be advised that the Planning Committee supports the Notice of Motion ‘Better Planning to Facilitate Cycling.’

99 BUILDING MORE HOUSING ON BROWNFIELD LAND - REFERRAL FROM CABINET 10 SEPTEMBER 2015

A Report considered by the Cabinet on 10 September 2015 was referred to the Planning Committee for reference.

The Report sought Cabinet Members approval to establish a register of brownfield sites suitable for residential development and were relevant to develop Local Development Orders identified on suitable sites.

The Cabinet recommended that the Head of Regeneration and Planning be requested to report the draft Local Development Orders and the outcome of the consultation to the Planning Committee who would determine the final adoption of an Order.

Resolved – That the report be noted.

100 PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS BETWEEN 07/09/2015 AND 11/10/2015

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted a report detailing planning applications decided under delegated powers between 07/09/2015 and 11/10/2015.

Resolved – That the report be noted.

101 PLANNING APPEALS DECIDED BETWEEN 01/07/2015 AND 30/09/2015

The Strategic Director for Regeneration and Environment submitted a report detailing planning appeals decided between 01/07/2015 and 30/09/2015 Resolved – That the report be noted. Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/00398 North Team Mr M Parry -Davies

Location: 11 SEABANK ROAD, EGREMONT, CH44 0EE Proposal: Change of use to house in multiple occupancy - 6 bedroom property increasing to 7 bedrooms with internal alterations Applicant: Mr A Skeete Agent : SDA Architecture & Surveying

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan designation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History:

Location: Southward extension of Greenwood Lane to Trafalgar Road, Egremont. L44 1D Application Type: Work for Council by Council Proposal: Carriageway improvements to Greenwood Lane, provision of car parking facilities, and associated landscaping work. Application No: APP/85/06879 Decision Date: 17/12/1985 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Rear boundary walls to 11-23, 35, Seabank Road and 16-20, 24, 32-38, Poole Road, Application Type: Work for Council by Council Proposal: Replacement of rear wall by 2.3m. wall and new rear gates or shutters. Application No: APP/87/06717 Decision Date: 19/11/1987 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Various properties within Liscard Ward (CH44), east of Stringhey and Rice Hey Road, north of Tobin Street, west of Egremont Promenade and south of Manor Drive. Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Proposed installation of externally applied insulation to the rear and gables of properties with either a coloured render or pebble dash finish. Various properties within Liscard Ward (CH44), properties fronting Blenheim Road, Egremont Promenad e, Cliff Drive, Cunard Avenue, King Street, Kinglake Road, Poole Road, Cunard Avenue, Ismay Drive, Rudgrave Place, Rudgrave Square, Seabank Avenue, Seabank Road, King George Drive, St Brides Road, St Elmo Road, St Lucia Road, St Vincents Road, Trafalgar Av enue, Trafalgar Road, King George Drive, Poole Road, Richard Chubb Drive, Seabank Road, Wright Street, Whitley Drive and Webster Avenue. Application No: APP/12/00650 Decision Date: 02/07/2012 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS Having regards to the Council's Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 36 letters of notification were sent to neighbouring properties. A Site Notice was also displayed at the site. One letter of objection from 13 Seabank Road has been received together with a qualifying petition signed by 37 signatures. The objections are summarised as follows:

1. rising crime figures since conversions of large family homes into flats and multi-occupancy housing; 2. the number of flats and multi-occupancy houses in the area has had a negative impact on the local environment; 3. if allowed, this property could have as many as 14 residents living in a property that was originally designed as a single family home; and 4. another house in multi-occupancy would have negative impact on house prices in the area.

CONSULTATIONS Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic and Transportation Division) - may lead to a small increase in demand for on-street parking but this is unlikely to be significant. No objections to the proposal.

Head of Environment & Regulation (Environmental Health Division) - No objections

Head of Housing (Housing Strategy Team) - No objections

Director's Comments:

Consideration of this application was deferred at Planning Committee on 21 October 2015 to allow for a Member's Site Visit to take place.

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE A qualifying petition of objection to the application, signed by 37 signatures, has been received. Therefore, under the provisions of the Scheme of Delegation for Determining Planning Applications, this application is required to be considered and determined by the Planning Committee. Additionally, the agents for this application are SDA Architecture & Surveying, a partner and architect at which is also an elected Member of the Council.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is for a change of use to a house in multiple occupancy. The existing property is a 6 bedroom dwelling and the proposal is to convert the property into a 7 bedroom house in multiple occupancy. The property is a detached property located at the end of a row of dwellings located near the junction of Trafalgar Road with Seabank Road/King Street. There are residential properties adjacent to the site, a small car park and garages to the rear and further afield, a small number of commercial and/or retail premises. The area is, however, predominantly residential in character.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The site designated as part of the Primarily Residential Area where proposal to convert existing building to multiple occupancy are not permitted unless all the criteria in UDP Policy HS14 (Houses in Multiple Occupation) can be fulfilled.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS As outlined above, the property is a 6 bedroomed detached family home. The area is predominantly characterised by residential properties with some small scale retail/commercial properties located along King Street and further up Trafalgar Road.

POLICY CONTEXT UDP Policy HS14 allows for the conversion of existing properties to multi-occupancy subject to all of its criteria being satisfied. The type of accommodation provided within houses in multiple occupation ranges from bed sitting rooms to bed and breakfast establishments for long stay residents. Such properties can provide a valuable source of low-cost accommodation if properly managed.

The property subject to these proposals is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposals, increasing the number of bedrooms from 6 to 7. The property is detached. The proposals would not result in a private dwelling having an HMO on both sides. It is not considered that the proposals would result in a change in the character of the surrounding area which would be detrimental. Whilst there are other HMO's in the vicinity of the site, the proposal would not result in a concentration of such properties that would give rise to an adverse effect on the character of the area. The proposals would not adversely impact on the privacy of neighbours and habitable rooms to both neighbouring properties and the application property would not be affected. No external staircases are proposed with all staircase access being provided within the main structure of the building. There are no extensions proposed with the exception of two rear dormers. These dormers would not result in overlooking of adjoining properties to any unacceptable degree. The proposals make use of existing window openings and all main bedrooms and living rooms maintain reasonable outlook. The proposals would not result in more than 20% or more of properties forming the street frontage within this street block being in multiple occupancy. It is therefore considered that the proposals comply with all requirements of Policy HS14 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling, including home composting.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES Proposals for housing in multiple occupancy can bring about a number of issues, both in terms of the quality of the accommodation to be provided and the impact(s) on adjoining properties and the character of the surrounding area. Such impacts may result due to the number of residents proposed in an HMO and the consequent comings and goings, especially when compared to activity arising from normal family housing. The proposals are located close to the junction of Trafalgar Road and King Street/Seabank Road. The surrounding road network is relatively busy providing main links from and Egremont through to New Brighton. The area is predominantly residential in character, with a number of other properties having been converted to multi-occupancy. However, the predominant character of the area is one of family housing and/or self-contained flats. The proposals provide for 7 bedrooms, each with en-suite facilities and shared living rooms and kitchens proposed on the ground floor and on the second floor. Therefore, the standard of accommodation proposed is considered to be satisfactory with good sized bedrooms being proposed. Although the proposals are likely to result in a small increase in demand for on-street car parking, it is considered that there is sufficient capacity within the immediate vicinity to accommodate this demand. Consequently, the proposed development would not materially harm the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular reference to the availability of on-street parking. The proposals are not considered to result in any detrimental impact on neighbouring properties or on the overall character of the area.

SEPARATION DISTANCES The proposals would not adversely impact on the privacy of neighbours and habitable rooms to both neighbouring properties and the application property would not be affected. The proposals make use of existing window openings and all main bedrooms and living rooms maintain reasonable outlook.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS Given the scale of the development, the number of trips generated by the development would be limited and would have a negligible impact on the surrounding highway network. The application site is within easy walking distance of main bus routes giving access to the public transport network. Given the predominantly residential nature of the surrounding side streets, the demand for on-street parking, particularly during evenings and weekends is likely to be greater. However, as the proposals are located within easy access to good public transport links and are close to amenities, the development proposed would be likely to be attractive to people who do not own cars. However, the development would still potentially lead to an increase in demand for on-street parking in the vicinity for both residents and visitors. Given the small scale nature of the proposals, it is considered that there would be sufficient capacity within the immediate vicinity to accommodate a small increase in demand for on-street parking. It is considered that such an increase in demand would be unlikely to materially increase the instances of hazardous parking which would be detrimental to highway safety in the area, having regard to existing parking restrictions already in place, particularly around the junctions of Trafalgar Road, King Street and Seabank Road. Consequently, it is not considered that there are sufficient ground for withholding planning permission in this case on the grounds of highway safety and/or parking issues.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES Environmental/Sustainability issues relate to the impact on the character of the area from this proposal.

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application.

CONCLUSION Policy HS14 allows for the conversion of existing properties to multi-occupancy subject to all its criteria being satisfied. The property subject to these proposals is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposals. It is not considered that the proposals would result in a change in the character of the surrounding area which would be detrimental. The proposals would not result in a concentration of properties in multi-occupancy that would give rise to an adverse effect on the character of the area. The proposals would not adversely impact on the privacy of neighbours and habitable rooms to both neighbouring properties and the application property would not be affected. Although the proposals are likely to result in a small increase in demand for on-street car parking, it is considered that there is sufficient capacity within the immediate vicinity to accommodate this demand. Consequently, the proposed development would not materially harm the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular reference to the availability of on-street parking. Therefore, the proposals are considered to be acceptable, having regard to the provisions of Policy HS14 (Houses in Multiple Occupation) and the principles of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

Policy HS14 allows for the conversion of existing properties to multi-occupancy subject to criteria being satisfied. The property subject to these proposals is of sufficient size to accommod ate the proposals. It is not considered that the proposals would result in a change in the character of the surrounding area which would be detrimental. The proposals would not result in a concentration of properties in multi-occupancy that would give rise to an adverse effect on the character of the area. The proposals would not adversely impact on the privacy of neighbours and habitable rooms to both neighbouring properties and the application property would not be affected. Although the proposals are likely to result in a small increase in demand for on-street car parking, it is considered that there is sufficient capacity within the immediate vicinity to accommodate this demand. Consequently, the proposed development would not materially harm the li ving conditions of neighbouring residents with particular reference to the availability of on-street parking. Therefore, the proposals are considered to be acceptable, having regard to the provisions of Policy HS14 (Houses in Multiple Occupation) and the principles of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until details of secure covered cycle parking and/or storage facilities have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. These facilities shall be provided in accordance with the approved details and made available for use prior to the first use of the development hereby permitted and shall be retained for use at all times thereafter.

Reason : To ensure that satisfactory facilities for the parking of cycles are provided and to encourage travel by means other than the private car, having regard to Policy TR12 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

3. PRIOR TO FIRST OCCUPATION of the dwellings arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to Policy WM9 of the Waste Local Plan.

4. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 19 March 2015 and listed as follows: Drawing Number 41_2015_02 (dated 03.03.2015)

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 21/04/2015 11:09:19 Expiry Date: 14/05/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: OUT/15/00977 North Team Ms J Storey Wallasey

Location: Grazing Land, LEASOWE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE Proposal: Outline application for 10 dwellings Applicant: Mr D J Earlam Agent : Matthews and Goodman LLP

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area Planning History:

Location: Grazing Land, LEASOWE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Proposal: Resubmission of outline application for 16 dwellings Planning Application Reference: OUT/13/00810 Application No: OUT/14/00105 Decision Date: 16/05/2014 Decision Type: Refuse

Location: Webster Market Garden, Green Lane, Wallasey Village, Wirral, L45 8LZ Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of 31 dwellings and access road (outline). Application No: OUT/98/05354 Decision Date: 24/04/1999 Decision Type: Approve

Location: West of 1-43 Greenleas Road and west of 192 Leasowe Road, Wallasey Village, CH45 8 Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of 8 no. detached houses with access road to Greenleas Close Application No: OUT/02/06143 Decision Date: 11/07/2002 Decision Type: Withdrawn

Location: Webster Market Garden, Green Lane, Wallasey Village, Wirral, CH45 8LZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of 35 dwelling houses and garages and construction of foul and surface water sewer link to Leasowe Road Application No: APP/99/06431 Decision Date: 19/10/1999 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Grazing Land, LEASOWE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Proposal: Outline planning application for the erection of 16no. residential units. Application No: OUT/13/00810 Decision Date: 07/11/2013 Decision Type: Refuse

Appeal Details Application No OUT/14/00105 Appeal Decision Dismissed Appeal Decision Date 29/01/2015

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Councils Guidance for Publicity on Applications 32 notifications were sent to adjoining properties and a Site Notice was displayed near the site. At the time of writing, a qualifying petition containing 69 signatures and 46 individual letters of objection have been received against the proposal. The objections can be summarised as follows:-

1. Overdevelopment of the site 2. Access not wide enough for emergency vehicles and refuse lorries 3. No consideration is made for pedestrian traffic from the new development into Greenleas Close, residents gardens go right to the roadside 4. No pedestrian route up to the school which will lead to an increase in accidents 5. The traffic survey submitted is wrong and not subjective 6. Development shows utter disregard for current residents 7. No justification for the quantum of development or that it meets UDP Policy HS4 8. No supporting studies have been provided 9. Not in support of the Settlement Area Policy document 10. Reduced delineation between Leasowe/Wallasey 11. Why wasn't this site developed when the other houses were first built 12. Site is partly in the Green Belt 13. Loss of Green Space 14. Surface Water Flood Risk 15. Effect of the development on the character of the neighbourhood 16. Walkway through to Leasowe Road 17. Overlooking 18. Loss of trees and the building of houses will increase noise and light for the current residents 19. Loss of land at the bottom of Greenlease Close as a children’s play area 20. Fall in Value of current values 21. Increase in traffic and congestion and on street parking 22. Highway Safety issues 23. Proposed Residents would suffer from noise from slip road 24. Footprint of the proposed houses are smaller than surrounding properties 25. Unadopted footpath that runs along rear of the back gardens 26. Access to the shared roadway into the proposed development is close to my property create noise pollution 27. Neighbour is disabled and proposal would overlook area where he is cared for 28. Make access to the rear of the houses on Greenlease Road a target for Burglars 29. There is a covenant on the land which restricts its use to Agriculture 30. The benefits of leaving a small piece of land far outweighs the greed of the developers 31. Parking survey performed during spring/summer. suspect lower level of traffic

A further petition containing 118 signatures has been received from the school. The objections can be summarised as follows:

1. the scheme is over development of the site 2. would result in an increase in nuisance and disturbance

CONSULTATIONS:

Head of Environment and Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) - No objections

Head of Environment and Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No objections

Head of Environment and Regulation (Drainage Engineers) as Lead Local Flood Authority – no objections subject to conditions (see Conditions 9 & 10 below).

United Utilities - Will not permit building across an existing public sewer. Require an access strip of three metres either side

Wirral Society - object for the following reasons:

1. The proposal does not relate to these adjacent dwellings and would cause a detrimental change in terms of residential amenity. 2. The proposal is such that distances to existing properties would create loss of privacy and outlook. 3. Building on the proposed site would outweigh any possible benefits as the original purpose of this land was to act as a buffer zone from descending traffic from the A554 4. To erect only even 10 dwellings In this position would put that particular development even nearer to the traffic than the dwellings in Greenleas Rd 5. To emphasise that the proposal will have 20mph traffic flow and speed bumps is not relevant. What is relevant is the traffic, always increasing on the slip road itself affecting the proposal. 6. This site and its relationship to the A554 is more suitable as an open space with the character it gives to the area. 7. The site has a superior environmental use in what it contributes to the approach to Leasowe Rd. 8. Whilst the scheme has been reduced by 6 dwellings to reflect the Inspectors comments, the proposal will have an adverse effect on some properties in Greenleas Rd.

Director's Comments:

Consideration of this application was deferred at Planning Committee on 21 October 2015 to allow for a formal Member's Site Visit to take place.

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE A qualifying petition of objection has been received signed by 69 signatures. As such the application is required to be considered and determined by the Planning Committee having regards to the provisions of the Scheme of Delegation for Determining Application as approved by Council in March 2014.

INTRODUCTION This is an outline application with all matters reserved for the erection of 10 no residential units on grazing land between Leasowe Road and Greenleas Close. The site measures approximately 6,000m2. Drawings have been submitted indicating a proposed layout and indicative elevations. The proposed scheme proposes 3, detached two storey dwellings, 6, semi-detached two storey dwellings and a bungalow.

There have been two previous applications on the site. The first (OUT/02/06143) for 8 dwellings was withdrawn and the second (OUT/13/00810) for 16 dwellings was refused and subsequently dismissed on appeal.

The two reasons for refusing the later application related to over development of the site by reason of the quantum and scale of the proposed development and highway safety and additional traffic generation fronting Greenlease school.

The inspector in dismissing the appeal stated that "the elongated nature of the site and its awkward configuration of the site necessitates confining most of the proposed dwellings to the southern portion of the plot. The density would be greater and that, together with the relative narrow plots and smaller dwellings would create a cramped impression out of keeping with the detached dwellings in Greenleas Close or the established semi-detached suburban villas along Leasowe Road.....I consider the illustrative layout to be mediocre with little form or focus.

The Inspector further notes that Greenleas Close ends in a shared surface approximately 30m in length that curves between some six properties. While the use of this section by the traffic generated from the proposed development, might at first sight, appear to meet the guidance in Manual for Streets, it seems to me that there would be elements in the configuration of the cul-de-sac that would undermine the proper application of that concept. Drivers from almost all of the proposed dwellings would approach the shared surface via a virtually straight stretch of carriageway, about 130m in length, and accommodating only 3 fairly modest chicane's. Given the likely tidal nature and low level of traffic, I do not accept that such a configuration would be commensurate with a design speed suitable to appropriately negotiate the shared surface. For these reasons, I consider that the limited level of traffic likely to materialise would not greatly exacerbate road hazards.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The site is designated as a Primarily Residential Area in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan, and the principle of residential dwellings are acceptable subject to UDP Policy HS4 ‘New Housing Development and the National Planning Policy Framework.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The site comprises a grassed and hard surfaced piece of land with stables, grazing and riding areas. It is designated as a Primarily Residential Area in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan. There are mature trees to the west boundary outside the site, screening the proposal from the slip road off the A554. Greenleas Road to the east of the site is characterised by traditional semi-detached properties with 15m rear gardens, and is positioned lower than the site. Greenleas Close to the north is characterised by an open plan estate of detached brick dwellings. There is a Primary School at the head of Greenleas Close.

POLICY CONTEXT

The Development Plan The site is designated as part of the Primarily Residential Area in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (UDP saved by direction of the Secretary of State on 27 September 2007).

Policy HS4 (Criteria for New Housing Development) of the UDP sets out the parameters for acceptable residential development stating that the proposal should be of a scale which relates well to the surrounding properties with particular regards to existing form and density.

Policy HSG2 (Affordable Housing) of the UDP states that the Local Planning Authority will negotiate with developers and housing associations the provision of affordable housing where appropriate.

Policy GR5 (Landscaping and New Development) of the UDP requires applicants to submit full landscape proposals before planning permission is granted.

Policy GR7 (Trees and New Development) of the UDP sets out the criteria to assess the need to protect trees by having regard to health and structure of existing trees with a view to provide replacement trees.

Policy WA2 (Development and Land Drainage) of the UDP states that conditions may be imposed requiring surface water storage where there could be a significant increase in surface water run-off from the area.

Policy WA5 (Protecting Surface Waters) of the UDP only permits development which does not exacerbate existing problems such as increased frequency of discharges through storm sewer overflows due to inadequate infrastructure or lack of sewer capacity.

Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, and Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling.

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) The National Planning Policy Framework makes it clear that the purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development and that good design is a key aspect which should contribute positively for making places better for people.

Sustainable housing development should encompass good design and widen the choice of high quality homes. Paragraph 64 states that development of poor design that fails to take opportunities for improving the character and quality of an area and the way it functions should be refused

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The application is for outline consent with all matters reserved, however, the applicants have provided an indicative layout and possible elevational treatments. The site is to be accessed via Greenlease close to the north and will utilise a single road running through the site. To this end, the scheme will integrate well into its surroundings by reinforcing existing connections and creating a new one The submitted drawings also identify a possible pedestrian/cycle access onto Leasowe Road which will ensure that the site is permeable from west to east. It has been suggested that a barrier could be provided that prohibited cars from gaining access.

The indicative scheme proposed a mix of semi-detached and detached dwellings and a bungalow that should create a broad based community and is commensurate with the surrounding development. Off street parking will be provided for each property The proposal also includes for a small public landscaped area to the east of the side that could incorporate a suds scheme in addition to creating and enhancing a wildlife habitat.

The applicant has provided a street scene which indicates the design scale and height of the proposed dwellings. It is considered that the elevations as proposed exhibit a certain architectural quality and detailing. The scale and height of the proposed houses are similar to the surrounding area.

In addressing the Inspectors previous concerns with earlier schemes, the proposed layout is not confined to the southern portion of the plot. The density is now lower and the plots wider and the footprint of the dwellings similar to surrounding properties.

The site is located close to community facilities such as shops, schools and a mix of public transport providers.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Habitable room windows directly facing each other should be at least 21 metres apart. Main habitable room windows should be at least 14 metres from any blank gable. If there are differences in land levels or where development adjoins that of different ridge height, such as three-storey development adjacent to two-storey property, a greater separation should be provided. For every metre difference in ridge height (or part thereof) the above distances should be increased by 2 metres.

The applicants have advised that the exact location of bellow ground services will be determined prior to the submission of a reserved matters application. There is a 10m easement through the site, which may require modification to the submitted layout. This is a matter reserved for future approval.

The illustrative layout provided for 25m interface distance between the rear elevations of existing properties along Leasowe Road and the proposed two storey dwellings. There is a shorter distance of 20m between the proposed dwelling on plot 2; however, it is proposed that this is to be a bungalow where the potential for overlooking can be mitigated by boundary treatment. The proposed scheme can therefore be accepted having regards to interface distances.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS A volume of objections have been received from local residents and parents with concerns to the additional traffic, parking and congestion the proposed 16 new dwellings would bring. This is exacerbated by the position of Greenleas Primary School at the junction into Greenleas Close.

There has been some concerns from residents that there is a public right of way through the site. However, this is not the case. The proposed scheme will in fact provide access for pedestrians and cyclist through the site.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES Objections were received regarding flood risk, loss of trees and wildlife habitat. The site is located within the lowest risk zone, Flood Zone 1. However the concerns of the neighbours regarding flooding from rainfall on the ground surface and rising groundwater overwhelming sewers and drainage systems are relevant. The proposal is to remove a large amount of permeable surface and replace the majority with hard surfacing. As such it will be essential in the application for reserved matters the applicant sets out a proposal for sustainable urban drainage system. There is a copse of trees adjacent to the site but not within the boundary. The applicant proposes a small landscaped/wooded area. In addition, it is considered that this reduction in the number of dwellings will allow for a better landscaping scheme. A landscaping scheme is considered necessary given the previous open use of the site.

Section 106 for Affordable Housing Proposals for new market housing of 5 dwellings or above will normally be required to provide affordable housing on-site at the following rates:

• within areas of greatest need - 10% • outside areas of greatest need - 20%

A reduced level of provision will be approved where an independently verified site-specific assessment has been submitted to demonstrate that the site would not be viable for housing development at the rate specified .

In this instance the applicant has agreed to the required level of affordable housing which will be delivered through a Section 106 agreement.

CONCLUSION The proposed development is considered to be acceptable and it will not have an unacceptable adverse impact on the amenities of neighbouring properties through overlooking, poor outlook or through the amount of traffic generated or highway safety issues. The application site is in a sustainable location close to shops and good public transport links. The proposal is therefore considered to comply with the Wirral Unitary Development Plan Policy HS4, and the National Planning Policy Framework

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirr al Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The proposed development is considered to be acceptable and it will not have an unacceptable adverse impact on the amenities of neighbouring properties through overlooking, poor outlook or through the amount of traffic generated or highway safety issues. T he application site is in a sustainable location close to shops and good public transport links. The proposal is therefore considered to comply with the Wirral Unitary Development Plan Policy HS4, and the National Planning Policy Framework.

Recommended Approve subject to a Section 106 Legal Agreement Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission or two years from the date of the approval of the last of the reserved matters, whichever is the later.

Reason : To comply with Section 92 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. Details of the reserved matters set out below shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval within three years from the date of this permission:

(a) Layout (b) Scale (c) Appearance (d) Access and (e) Landscaping

Approval of all reserved matters shall be obtained from the Local Planning Authority in writing before any development is commenced and shall be carried out as approved.

Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to control the development in detail and to comply with Section 92(as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

3. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until full details and samples of materials for all external work has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory development which does not prejudice the ame nity of the locality.

4. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensur e that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with policies WM8 and WM9 of the Waste Local Plan.

5. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE BEFORE details of the proposed finished floor levels; ridge and eaves heights of the dwelling hereby approv ed have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The submitted levels shall be measured against a fixed datum and shall show the existing and finished ground levels, eaves and ridge heights of neighbouring property. The development shall be carried out as approved.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory relationship between the various components of the development and between the site and adjoining land, to ensure that construction is carried out at a suitable level having re gard to drainage, access, the appearance of the development, any trees and hedgerows and the amenities of neighbouring properties, having regard to Policy HS4 and GR7 of the adopted Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

6. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 20th July 2015 and listed as follows: L(80)001

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

7. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE (in cluding any demolition, earthworks or vegetation clearance) until a scheme of landscaping, phased in relation to any phasing of the development, which shall include details of both hard and soft landscaping works and earthworks, has been submitted to and a pproved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall include for but not restricted to the following details:

a. existing trees and shrubs not directly affected by the buildings and works. b. walls and fences c. proposed walls and fencing, indicating materials and heights. d. screen planting on boundary e. existing contours and any alteration, such as earth mounding, f. details of the proposed arrangements for maintenance of the landscaping

The scheme as app roved shall be carried out prior to the first occupation of any of the dwellings hereby approved. Any trees, shrubs or plants that die within a period of 5 years from the completion of the development, or are removed and/or become seriously damaged or dis eased in that period, shall be replaced (and if necessary continue to be replaced) in the first available planting season with others of similar size and species, unless the Local Planning Authority gives prior written approval for any variation.

Reason : To ensure satisfactory landscape treatment of the site which will enhance the character and appearance of the site and the area, having regard to Policy HS4 and Policy GR5 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

8. PRIOR TO FIRST OCCUPATION OR USE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details previous submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the first occupation of the building.

Reason; To ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to Waste Local Plan Policy WM9

9. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until a scheme for the provision a nd implementation for the discharge of surface water from the site, incorporating sustainable drainage details, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. As a minimum, such a scheme shall include:

a. Information about the lifetime of the development design storm period and intensity (1 in 30 & 1 in 100 years +30% allowance for climate change); b. Discharge rates and volumes (both pre and post development); c. Temporary storage facilities; d. Means of access for maintenance and easements where applicable; e. Methods employed to delay and control surface water discharged from the site; f. Measures taken to prevent flooding and pollution of the receiving ground water and/or surface waters, including watercourses g. Flood water exceedance routes, both on and off site; h. A timetable for implementation, including phasing where applicable; i. Site investigation and test results to confirm infiltration rates.

The drainage scheme should demonstrate that the peak run off rate from the development to any highway drain, sewer or surface water body for the 1 in 1 year rainfall event and the 1 in 100 years rainfall event should never exceed the peak greenfield run off rate for the same event.

The development shall not be brought into use or the dwellings first occupied until the scheme as approved has been fully implemented in accordance with the timing/phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme and shall be subsequently maintained as such thereafter.

Reason : To prevent increase risk of flooding by ensuring that the development can be adequately drained and to comply with Policies WA2 and WA5 of the Wirral Unitary Development and Paragraph 103 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

10. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLAC E until details of an appropriate management and maintenance plan for the sustainable drainage system for the lifetime of the development has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. As a minimum, such a scheme shall include:

a. The arrangements for adoption by an appropriate public body or statutory undertaker or management and maintenance by a Management Company; b. Arrangements concerning appropriate funding mechanisms for its on-going maintenance of all elements of the sustainable drainage system (including mechanical components) and will include elements such as: i. On-going inspections relating to performance and asset condition assessments; and ii. Operation costs for regular maintenance, remedial works and irregu lar maintenance caused by less sustainable limited life assets or any other arrangements to secure the operation of the surface water drainage scheme throughout its lifetime. c. Means of access for maintenance and easements where applicable

The development shall not be brought into use or the dwellings first occupied until the scheme as approved has been fully implemented and shall be subsequently managed and maintained as such thereafter.

Reason : To prevent increase risk of flooding by e nsuring that the development can be adequately drained and to comply with Policies WA1, WA2, WA3 and WA5 of the Wirral Unitary Development and Paragraph 103 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

11. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until full details of the access road has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Such details shall include but not be restricted to any footways, footpaths, verges, junctions, street lighting, sewers, drains, retaining walls,, surface w ater outfall, embankments, visibility splays, carriageway gradients, drive gradients, street furniture and traffic calming measures, and shall include the timetable for the provision of such works. The development shall not be first occupied until the det ails as agreed have all been constructed and laid out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason : To ensure the access road is laid out and constructed in a safe and satisfactory manner, having regard to Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 10/09/2015 15:32:09 Expiry Date: 19/10/2015 Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/00979 South Team Miss A McDougall Heswall

Location: Land North West to 1 THE KNAP, GAYTON, CH60 0EX Proposal: Proposed new 2 bed dormer property on land at 1 The Knap Applicant: Mr & Mrs Stoker Agent : Architects-Direct.com

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area Density and Design Guidelines Area

Planning History:

Location: 1 THE KNAP, GAYTON, CH60 0EX Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Two storey side & single storey rear extension Application No: APP/13/01267 Decision Date: 09/12/2013 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 48 Dawstone Road, Gayton, Wirral, CH60 0BS Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of single storey side extension with formation of balcony to existing bedrooms Application No: APP/07/07478 Decision Date: 14/04/2008 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 'The Knap', Dawstone Road,Gayton,L60 0BS Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of 2 dwelling units. Application No: APP/79/14398 Decision Date: 26/06/1980 Decision Type: Refuse

Location: The Knap ,Dawstone Road ,Gayton,Wirral,L60 0BS Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of four detached houses with garages. Application No: APP/80/16426 Decision Date: 28/10/1980 Decision Type: Conditional Approval

Location: The Knap ,Dawstone Road ,Gayton ,L60 0BS Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Layout of land for 4 detached dwellings and construction of access road and sewers. Application No: APP/83/23184 Decision Date: 25/08/1983 Decision Type: Conditional Approval

Location: The Knap, Dawstone Road,Gayton,Wirral,L60 0BS Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of four detached houses with double garages. Application No: APP/83/23350 Decision Date: 11/10/1983 Decision Type: Conditional Approval

Location: LAND AT 1 THE KNAP, GAYTON, CH60 0EX Application Type: Planning Pre-Application Enquiry Proposal: New build residential dormer property Application No: PRE/15/00061/ENQ Decision Date: 16/03/2015 Decision Type: Pre-Application Reply

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 12 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report 11 objections have been received and a qualifying petition of objection containing 66 separate signatures, listing the following grounds:

1. visual impact 2. scale 3. access 4. out of character 5. removal of protected trees - the Councils Tree Preservation Officer is aware of the trees that have been removed 6. loss of open entrance 7. proximity to Dawstone Road 8. loss of privacy 9. restrictive covenant

CONSULTATIONS: Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) - No Objections

Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No Objections

Director’s Comments:

Consideration of this application was deferred at Planning Committee on 21 October 2015 to allow for a Member's Site Visit to take place.

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE Councillor Hodson has requested that the application be taken out of delegation. A qualifying petition of objection has been received in that the dwelling would be out of character with the surrounding area, the property is too large for the plot and vehicle safety issues.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is for the erection of a dwelling. The plot that is to be developed is owned by the current residents of 1 The Knap, following the submission the proposed dwelling has been reduced in scale.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The site is located within a Primarily Residential Area, the principle of building a dwelling is acceptable.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The proposed dwelling is to be sited on a piece of land that is allocated as garden space in relation to 1 The Knap, however the land is not utilised due to the land being detached from the residential plot and across the road (The Knap). The property is located on The Knap which is accessed off Dawstone Road.

The character of the area is not uniform, there is a wide range of dwelling houses with a mix of siting, plot size, scale and design styles. There is a myriad of house designs ranging from older cottage properties to more modern three storey buildings, The land levels vary greatly along Dawstone Road which bounds The Knap due to this the properties to the north are set at a much more elevated level, there has clearly been various subdivisions of plots within the immediate area and there is no uniformity to the plot shapes or sizes.

POLICY CONTEXT The proposal is for a new dwelling within the Primarily Residential Area and will be assessed in accordance with Wirral's UDP Policy HS4. Policy HS4 Criteria for New Housing Development Policy states; Proposals for new housing development on allocated sites and within the Primarily Residential Areas shown on the Proposals Map will be permitted subject to the proposal fulfilling all the following criteria:

(i) the proposal being of a scale which relates well to surrounding property, in particular with regard to existing densities and form of development;

(ii) the proposal not resulting in a detrimental change in the character of the area;

(iii) access and services being capable of satisfactory provision, particularly for off-street car parking areas and garages, and adequate vehicular access;

(iv) the provision of appropriate landscaping and boundary treatment which relates the proposed development to its surroundings, paying particular attention to the maintenance of existing natural features and vegetation in accordance with Policy GR5;

(v) the appropriate provision of design features which contribute to a secure environment and reduce the likelihood of crime;

(vi) incorporating provision for accessible public open space and children’s play areas in accordance with Policy GR6; and

(vii) the provision of adequate individual private or communal garden space to each dwelling.

For all proposals whose main elevations are parallel, or nearly so, an adequate distance should be kept between habitable rooms in separate dwellings. In addition, where the gable end of one property fronts onto the rear elevation of another, then an adequate separation should be achieved. The plot is also within the Density and Design Guidelines Area Gayton Zone 2, Policy HS5 will be taken into account when determining the application. Policy HS5 states; Gayton Zone 2: Density should be at a maximum of 7.5 dwellings per hectare, with plot frontages and setbacks comparable to those of plots in close proximity. Open plan frontages will not be permitted. Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling, including home composting.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The proposed dwelling has been amended following local consultation and further discussion with the agent. The revised scheme as received by the Council on 7th September 2015 has reduced the first floor element of the proposed dwelling in order to create a property that is visually subordinate to the main frontage house no.1 The Knap when viewed from Dawstone Road.

The development plot is accessed via The Knap, the main frontage of the dwelling will face onto The Knap, the site partially bounds Dawstone Road however there is a formal vehicular access into 48 Dawstone Road and a sandstone wall that buffers the site from the frontage of Dawstone Road. The property will have a minimal impact onto Dawstone Road due to the position of the house and the layout of the existing street scene, the side elevation of the proposed dwelling does not come any further forward than 46 or 48 Dawstone Road.

The design of the dwelling gives the character and appearance of a gate house style dwelling, the scale of the building is minimal with the majority of the living space located at ground floor. The design of the building takes on a cottage style appearance that will relate to the style of no.48 with modern elements that take the design of the houses on the Knap into consideration. The majority of living accommodation is at ground floor, there is to be one bedroom with en-suite at first floor, the building has a height of 6.5m.

The siting, scale and appearance of the dwelling when read in relation to no.48 Dawstone Road and 1 The Knap is well balanced and would not be out of character.

The plot is set out with a front/side garden, the plot currently includes a sandstone wall with mature vegetation to the north boundary, and the proposal is to continue the sandstone wall around the plot with an opening to the side of the house for off street parking. The sandstone wall and the orientation of the house and the plot itself will allow for a private garden to the east of the house.

Concerns have been raised with regards to the scale, appearance and access. The plot is relatively modest in scale however the reduced scale of the dwelling sits more comfortably within the plot and is sited in w way which does not dominate existing neighbouring properties, it is also considered that due to the variation of house types within the immediate area the design will not be detrimental to the character of the area, the scale of the building is also modest and provides off street parking, the siting of the dwelling does not alter the existing access into The Knap.

Concerns have been raised over the removal of protected trees. The trees were removed before the application was submitted and is currently being investigated. A condition is recommended to ensure that the site is appropriately landscaped.

It is considered that the scale of the house is modest and will not dominate the street scene or the neighbouring houses, the varied character of the area allows for a property of this scale without being out of character, the plot is visually set back from the Dawstone Road frontage and will have a minimal visual impact onto the character of the area.

SEPARATION DISTANCES The predominant habitable room windows are located to the ground floor and face east and are set approximately 26m from the garage of no.1 The Knap. The sole bedroom window at first floor also faces east and will have visibility toward the garage and driveway of 1 The Knap, this elevation is also approximately 26m from the garage of 1 The Knap.

The rear elevation of the house that faces west is set over 14m from the windows to the east elevation of no.48 Dawstone Road.

The siting of the house in relation to existing dwelling houses meets the Councils separation distances of 21m window to window and 14m window to blank elevation.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals.

CONCLUSION It is considered that the scale, appearance and siting of the dwelling as amended is appropriate to the established character of the area taking into account Wirral's UDP Policies HS4 and HS5.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

It is considered that the scale, appearance and siting of the dwelling as amended is appropriate to the established character of the area taking into account Wirral's UDP Policies HS4 and HS5.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 7 September 2015 and listed as follows: PL11A, PL14A & PL12A.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. Before any construction commences, samples of the materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used i n the construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS5 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

4. Detailed drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any work is commenced to indicate the finished site and ground floor levels intended at the completion of the development in relation to the existing site levels an d the levels of the adjoining land and the development shall be carried out and completed in accordance with the details so approved. (Note: The gradients of any new road or turning area should not exceed 1:25 and those of parking or loading bays should not exceed 1:40).

Reason: To ensure that the development is satisfactorily sited and designed in relation to adjacent development and the highway and that satisfactory gradients are achieved.

5. The remainder of the undeveloped land within the site shall be suitably landscaped in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any works commence on site, the landscape work to be completed during the first available planting season following completion of the development hereby approved and shall be maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory standard of appearance and that the proposed development enhances the visual amenity of the locality.

6. Details of all fencing, walls, gateways and means of enclosure shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before the development hereby approved is completed and the work shall be carried out prior to occupation, in accordance with the details so approved, and subsequently maintained to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason(s): To ensure a proper standard of separation from, and standard of amenity with respect to the character of the area.

7. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with policies WM8 and WM9 of the Waste Local Plan.

8. PRIOR TO THE FIRST OCCUPATION OF THE DWELLINGS arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to policies WM8 and WM9 of the Waste Local Plan

9. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2008 (or any subsequent Order or statutory provision revoking or re-enacting the provisions of that Order), no garages, outbuildings or other extensions to a dwelling shall be erected unless expressly authorised.

Reason : In order to protect the character of the area/residential amenities of nearby occupants and to accord with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

10. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2008 (or any subsequent Order or statutory provision re-enacting or revoking the provisions of that Order), no window or do rmer window shall be added to the property unless expressly authorised.

Reason: In order to protect the residential amenities of nearby occupants and to accord with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

11. No development shall commence until a drainage scheme for the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The scheme shall provide for the disposal of foul, surface and land water and include an assessment of the potential to dispose of surface a nd land water by sustainable means. Thereafter the scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details prior to the occ upation of the development and no further foul water, surface water and land drainage shall be allowed to connect directly or indirectly with the public sewerage system.

Reason: To prevent overloading of the public sewerage system.

Last Comments By: 17/08/2015 14:13:06 Expiry Date: 07/09/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/00983 North Team Mr K Spilsbury West Kirby and

Location: Chestnut House, KINGS DRIVE, CALDY, CH48 2JF Proposal: Re-design of existing dwelling with proposed extensions to include a new swimming pool, gymnasium, habitable spaces. Proposed External works and re-model of the elevations and new external detached double garage and landscaping works. Applicant: Mr A Chadwick Agent : Condy & Lofthouse Architects Ltd

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area Density and Design Guidelines Area Site of Biological Importance Conservation Area (for illustrative purposes)

Planning History:

Location: Land adjacent to Barley House, Kings Drive, Caldy, Wirral, CH48 2JF Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Alterations to previously approved application 2003/6670 - for the erection of a new dwelling. Application No: APP/06/06429 Decision Date: 12/10/2006 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Land adjacent to Barley House, Kings Drive, Caldy, Wirral, CH48 2JF Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of new dwelling. Application No: APP/03/06670 Decision Date: 19/11/2003 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 15 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report 3 letters of objection have been received from the occupiers of Fernwood, The Barley House and Saltwood all of Kings Drive. The objections are summarised as follows:

1. this is an overdevelopment of the site, 2. too close to The Barley House, 3. the pool will impinge upon privacy, 4. too many trees being removed, it will come within 10m of the root structure of protected trees, 5. the pool will present a long unbroken section of wall that resembles and industrial or commercial building, 6. the large window in the north east elevation of the pool and dormer windows will overlook The Barley House, 7. the development is excessive and out of character that disregards its natural surroundings and the impact of the banking up of land to create a subterranean garage on the boundary wall between Chestnut house and Saltwood and by raising the level of the land would allow overlooking into the neighbouring Saltwood as a result of people being able to stand on it and 8. the impact of the two windows in the western elevation at first floor and the potential for overlooking.

Wirral Badger Group have asked for conditions to protect badgers.

Councillor Geoffrey Watt has asked for the application to be taken out of delegated on the grounds that nearby residents are concerned that the proposed development, by reason of its size and scale, represents overdevelopment of the site and is likely to affect the privacy of neighbours, contrary to policies HS11, CH2 and CH11 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan; the Caldy Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

CONSULTATIONS: Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) - No Objections

Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No Objections

Wirral Wildlife - no objection subject to conditions

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL Councillor Geoffrey Watt has asked for the application to be taken out of delegated and heard at planning committee on the grounds that nearby residents are concerned that the proposed development, by reason of its size and scale, represents overdevelopment of the site and is likely to affect the privacy of neighbours, contrary to policies HS11, CH2 and CH11 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan; the Caldy Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

INTRODUCTION The proposed development is for a re-design of the existing dwelling with proposed extensions to include a new swimming pool, gymnasium and habitable spaces. The proposal involves external works and re-modelling of the elevations as well as a new external detached double garage and landscaping works.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The proposal is for extensions and alterations to an existing property within the Caldy Conservation area and as such the principle of the development is acceptable subject to the policies outlined below.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The property is an large, detached dwelling located within the Caldy Conservation Area. The site lies adjacent to the listed Caldy Manor (to the south). Large detached dwellings dominate the surrounding area with Barley House to the east, Saltwood and Red Latches to the West and Hortiack and Lindisfarne to the north. There are a number of mature trees on the site and as such the dwelling is centrally located within the plot.

In accordance with the Donall Insall appraisal; Caldy village lies in the north-western part of the Wirral Unitary Authority area. It adjoins West Kirby, the principal settlement on the western shore facing the . The village is largely south and west facing but is separated from the shore by the Wirral Way, a former railway line.

The village has developed on the southern slopes of a small rocky eminence which rises to a maximum height of about 77m above sea level. Parts of the village are on the top of , some houses are located on the steeper slopes, but most are located on the more gentle lower slopes which merge with the coastal verge which generally lies at about 25m above sea level. The geology of the area is Bunter sandstone overlain in the southern part by Boulder Clay.

The village has a narrow range of building uses. Private dwellings predominate to a considerable degree. The only properties falling outside this category are the church and village institute and the residential home at Caldy Manor. There are no commercial premises

POLICY CONTEXT As stated above the site is located within the Caldy Conservation Area. The Donall Insall Associated Caldy Conservation Area Appraisal (appendix A) classifies the property as a Category C Property - Neutral, either modern buildings of little interest or buildings where character has been lost. The document also states that policies should be put in place to encourage the enhancement of, in particular Category Band C buildings.

Unitary Development Plan Policy CH11 - Caldy Conservation Area states; the principal planning objectives for the area will be to: retain the character of a low density, maturely landscaped suburb with substantial houses in large grounds; retain the unifying features of design, layout and building materials within the old village core; preserve the unity of strongly enclosed boundary treatment incorporating high walls, dense landscaping or dark-stained, close-boarded, timber fences in the area outside the old village core; and preserve, wherever practicable, views of the Dee Estuary and of the coast beyond. Only primarily residential uses will be permitted within this Area.

The site is also located within a site of Biological Importance as such policy NC6 and NC7 - Species Protection are relevant. Policy NC7 states; development which would have an adverse effect on wildlife species protected by law will not be permitted unless the Local Planning Authority is satisfied that the protection of the species can be secured through the use of planning conditions and/ or planning obligations.

Policy HS11 - House Extensions states proposals for house extensions will be permitted subject to all the following criteria being complied with: the scale of the extension being appropriate to the size of the plot, not dominating the existing building and not so extensive as to be unneighbourly, particular regard being had to the effect on light to and the outlook from neighbours' habitable rooms and not so arranged as to result in significant overlooking of neighbouring residential property, the materials matching or complementing those of the existing building; design features such as lintels, sills, eaves and roof form and line matching or complementing those of the existing building; where the rear extension is single storey on the party boundary and the existing dwelling semi-detached.

Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling, including home composting.

The National Planning Framework (NPPF) is also directly relevant. The National Planning Policy Framework advocates a presumption in favour of sustainable development as well as delivering a wide choice of high quality homes. It goes on to say; In determining planning applications, local planning authorities should take account of: the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation; the positive contribution that conservation of heritage assets can make to sustainable communities including their economic vitality; and the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES Planning consent was granted for the dwelling in 2003 (APP/06/06670) and then in 2006 alterations were approved under planning consent APP/06/06429. The proposal remodels and extends the existing house, introducing a new swimming pool, a repositioning of the garage further up the hill within the site, remodelling of the inside spaces to create open plan areas and larger bedrooms, a master bedroom suite to the south west corner of the property, a new garden room and associated remodelling of the external appearance of the building by introducing more glazing to the south facing elevations.

At the time of writing this report 3 letters of objection have been received from the occupiers of Fernwood, The Barley House and Saltwood all of Kings Drive. The objections are summarised as follows: this is an overdevelopment of the site, too close to The Barley House, the pool will impinge upon privacy, too many trees being removed, it will come within 10m of the root structure of protected trees, the pool will present a long unbroken section of wall that resembles and industrial or commercial building, the large window in the north east elevation of the pool and dormer windows will overlook The Barley House, the development is excessive and out of character that disregards its natural surroundings and the impact of the banking up of land to create a subterranean garage on the boundary wall between Chestnut house and Saltwood and by raising the level of the land would allow overlooking into the neighbouring Saltwood as a result of people being able to stand on it and the impact of the two windows in the western elevation at first floor and the potential for overlooking.

It is considered that the proposed alterations will enhance the existing property thus improving upon a neutral category C property. The dwelling is set well back from the road and whilst the new pool will create an enlarged eastern elevation it is set a sufficient distance away from the boundary of the adjacent property; the Barley House to ensure there is no adverse impact. The large front window is located at ground floor and faces north to the side of the adjacent Barley House. The existing boundary treatment running along the side boundary will be retained and should members be minded to approve the scheme a condition will be imposed to secure appropriate landscaping and boundary treatment to ensure the privacy of neighbouring dwellings is preserved. The amendments also include a landscaping plan that will enhance the land around the dwelling thus framing the building and creating an attractive frontage and rear garden. The design of the proposal is bold and modern. A condition for materials will be attached to an approval to ensure the finish of the building is in keeping with the character of the area.

The introduction of an detached garage to the north west of the plot is not deemed to result in any adverse impact upon the occupiers of the adjacent dwelling Saltwood or the boundary wall. The land falls from south to east and by incorporating the garage into the landscape softens the effect of the development upon the character of the building and the surrounding conservation area. The garage will act as a retaining wall and the land between the boundary wall and the west facing garage wall will remain the same. The raising of the land levels will potentially allow someone to stand on top of the re-graded land above the garage and potentially see over into the neighbouring plot, however the neighbouring property is heavily wooded and as such views into the private area of the garden will be limited. In addition it is unlikely that this area of the garden will be used for sitting out as it is located at the front of the site adjacent to the driveway and the rear garden is south facing making it the more attractive option for external use.

In terms of the Unitary Development Plan Policy CH11 - Caldy Conservation Area the development is deemed to retain the low density, maturely landscaped character of the area. The house is existing and the large grounds will be retained. All existing boundary treatment is to be retained and the views of the Dee Estuary and of the North Wales coast beyond will not be affected.

With regards to nature conservation, the site is within an area of local biological importance. Natural England advises the council that the proposal is unlikely to affect any statutorily protected sites or landscapes. Wirral and Badger Group have raised concern over the development as there is a badger sett close to the site and they claim there are shortcomings in the ecological assessment. They state there is potential risk of harm to badgers during construction activities and as such conditions for their protection is required. In addition Wirral Wildlife have also requested badger protection conditions and a condition to protect birds during the felling of trees. Should members be minded to approve the application appropriate conditions will be attached.

The arboricultural officer has assessed the impact of the development upon the protected trees and has raised no objection. A refusal on these grounds could therefore not be sustained.

It is considered that the proposed development is acceptable in terms of the criteria set out in Wirral’s unitary development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework and as such is recommended for approval.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Planning guidance suggests habitable room windows directly facing each other should be at least 21 metres apart. Main habitable room windows should be at least 14 metres from any blank gable. If there are differences in land levels or where development adjoins that of different ridge height, such as three-storey development adjacent to two-storey property, a greater separation should be provided. For every metre difference in ridge height (or part thereof) the above distances should be increased by 2 metres.

Separation distances are easily met, the closest residential property; The Barley House is approximately 24m from the site. No residential properties will be adversely affected by the proposed development.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal. The Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) has raised no objections to the scheme.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals. Should members be minded to approve the application conditions will be attached to ensure all appropriate habitat is preserved and protected species safe guarded. .

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application.

CONCLUSION It is considered that the proposed development is acceptable in terms of the criteria set out in Wirral's unitary development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework and as such is recommended for approval.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

It is considered tha t the proposed development is acceptable in terms of the criteria set out in Wirral’s unitary development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework and as such is recommended for approval.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 31st July 2015 and listed as follows: 13-125-134 A (Dated 10.15), 13-125-131 E (Dated 06.15), 13-125-132 E (Dated 06.15), 13-125-133 D (Dated 06.15), 13-125-160 F (Dated 06.15), 13-125-161 E (Dated 06.15), 13-125-110 B (Dated 06.15),

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. In order to protect habitats of special local importance for nature conservation:

i. Construction work shall only take place between 8am and 6pm. ii. Any holes or trenches left open overnight must have a means of escape provided. iii. All construction materials, especially those containing lime, must be stored so that badgers cannot access them, and to the front of the house, not the rear. iv. When fencing to the garden is installed, access shall be left for the badgers to move around between gardens. v. No fires to be lit in the vicinity of the sett vi. No heavy plat machinery to be driven or used in the vicinity of the sett vii. Any obvious badger paths to be left clear of obstruction viii. The boundary fences allow for the free movement of badgers

Reason: To protect the presence of Badgers on the site having regards to policy NC5 of Wirral's UDP

4. No tree, shrub or hedgerow felling, or any vegetation management and/or cutting operations should take place during the period 1st March to 31st August inclusive unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To protect birds during their br eeding season and to comply with Policy NC7 in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

5. No works or development shall take place until a scheme for the protection of the retained trees- The Tree protection plan (section 5.5, BS 5837:2012,Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction - Recommendations) has been agreed in writing with the LPA. This scheme shall include:

A. the details of each retained tree as required at section. 4.4 of BS5837 in a separate schedule. B. a plan or relevant drawings, in cluding proposed site layout plans, to a scale and level of accuracy appropriate to the proposal that shows constraints posed by existing trees (section 5.2 BS 5837), the position, crown spread and Root Protection Area (section 4.6 of BS5837) of every reta ined tree on site and on neighbouring or nearby ground to the site in relation to the approved plans and particulars. The positions of all trees to be removed shall be indicated on this plan. C. a schedule of tree works for all the retained trees in paragraph s (a) and (b) above, specifying pruning and other remedial or preventative work, whether for physiological, hazard abatement, aesthetic or operational reasons. All tree works shall be carried out in accordance with BS3998, 2010, Tree work-Recommendations.

An arboricultural method statement (section 6 BS 5837) containing;

D. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the Tree Protection Barriers (section 6.2 of BS5837), identified separately w here required for different phases of construction work (e.g. demolition, construction, hard landscaping). The Tree Protection Barriers must be erected prior to each construction phase commencing and remain in place, and undamaged for the duration of that phase. No works shall take place on the next phase until the Tree Protection Barriers are repositioned for that phase. E. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the Ground Protection Zones (para 6.2.3 of BS5837). F. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the Construction Exclusion Zones (section 6 of BS5837). G. the details and positions (shown on the plan at paragraph (a) above) of the underground service runs (para 5.5.6 of BS5837). H. the details of any changes in levels or the position of any proposed excavations within 5 metres of the Root Protection Area (para. 5.5.6 of BS5837) of any retained tree, including those on neighbouring or nearby ground. I. the details of any special engineering required t o accommodate the protection of retained trees (section 7 of BS5837), (e.g. in connection with foundations, bridging, water features, surfacing) J. the details of the working methods to be employed with the demolition of buildings, structures and surfacing wi thin or adjacent to the RPAs of retained trees (section 7 BS 5837). K. the details of the working methods to be employed for the installation of drives and paths within the RPAs of retained trees in accordance with the principles of "No-Dig" construction (section 7.4 BS 5837) L. the details of the working methods to be employed with regard to the access for and use of heavy, large, difficult to manoeuvre plant (including cranes and their loads, dredging machinery, concrete pumps, piling rigs, etc) on site. M. the de tails of the working methods to be employed with regard to site logistics and storage, including an allowance for slopes, water courses and enclosures, with particular regard to ground compaction and phytotoxicity. N. the details of the method to be employed for the stationing, use and removal of site cabins within any RPA (para. 6.2.2.3 of BS5837). O. the details of tree protection measures for site works, landscaping operations and management (section 8 of BS5837). P. the timing of the various phases of the works or development in the context of the tree protection measures.

Reason: To protect trees which are of significant amenity value having regards to Policy GR7 of Wirral's UDP

6. The following activities must not be carried out under any circumstances: A. No fires shall be lit within 10 metres of the nearest point of the canopy of any retained tree. B. No works shall proceed until the appropriate Tree Protection Barriers are in place, with the exception of initial tree works. C. No equipment, signage, fencing, tree protection barriers, materials, components, vehicles or structures shall be attached to or supported by a retained tree. D. No mixing of cement or use of other materials or substances shall take place within a RPA, or close enough to a RPA that seepage or di splacement of those materials or substances could cause then to enter a RPA E. No alterations or variations to the approved works or tree protection schemes shall be carried out without the prior written approval of the LPA.

Reason: To protect trees which ar e of significant amenity value having regards to policy GR7 of Wirral's UDP

7. No works or development shall take place until a specification of all proposed tree planting has been approved in writing by the LPA. This specification will include details of the quantity, size, species, position and the proposed time of planting of all trees to be planted, together with an indication of how they integrate with the proposal in the long term with regard to their mature size and anticipated routine maintenance . In addition all shrubs and hedges to be planted that are intended to achieve a significant size and presence in the landscape should be similarly specified. All tree, shrub and hedge planting included within that specification shall be carried out in a ccordance with that specification and in accordance with BS 3936 (parts 1, 1992, Nursery Stock, Specification for trees and shrubs, and 4, 1984, Specification for forest trees); BS4043, 1989, Transplanting root-balled trees; and BS4428, 1989, Code of practice for general landscape operations (excluding hard surfaces).

Reason: To protect trees which are of significant amenity value having regards to policy GR7 of Wirral's UDP

8. Before any construction commences, samples of the facing/roofing/window materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a sati sfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS11 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

9. No development shall take place until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with policies WM8 and WM9 of the Joint Waste Local Plan.

10. Prior to the first occupation of the dwellings arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the local planning au thority. the approved details shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority.

Reason : to ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to policies WM8 and WM9 of the Joint Waste Local Plan

11. The area(s) so designated within the site shall be suitably landscaped in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any works commence on site, the lands cape work to be completed during the first available planting season following completion of the development hereby approved and shall be maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

The detailed landscaping plans shall include:

(i) details of boundary treatments and hard surfaces (ii) the location, size and species of all trees to be planted (iii) the location, size, species and density of all shrub and ground cover planting (iv) a schedule of implementation

Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure that the development complies with Policy HS11 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

Last Comments By: 16/09/2015 13:54:23 Expiry Date: 25/09/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01040 North Team Mr K Spilsbury Bidston and St James

Location: Cleared Site Grassed Adjacent 54, OLD BIDSTON ROAD, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 8BL Proposal: Erection of three dwellings Applicant: Mr Scott Ward Agent : DJ Cooke & Co Ltd

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Industrial Area

Planning History:

Location: Land east of (adjacent) 54, Old Bidston Road, Birkenhead. L41 8BL Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of three dwelling houses, (outline). Application No: OUT/96/06232 Decision Date: 30/10/96 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS : Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 10 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report no representations or objections has been received

CONSULTATIONS: Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) - No Objections

Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No Objections

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE The application is a departure from the Unitary Development Plan and as such under the current scheme of delegation is required to be heard at planning committee

INTRODUCTION The proposed development is for the erection of three houses on a vacant brown field site adjacent to a row of terrace housing

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT Old Bidston Road is located within a Primarily Industrial Area as allocated within Wirral's Unitary Development Plan (UDP). The proposal to develop the site for housing is a departure from the development plan.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The site is an overgrown vacant plot of land positioned at the end of a row of terraced dwellings. The majority of the site is surrounded by other commercial business: opposite the site there is Pumptech engineering company and a container storage site beyond. There are large industrial buildings located to the west of the terrace properties as well as a number of other industrial uses located on Duke Street.

POLICY CONTEXT Old Bidston Road is located within a Primarily Industrial Area as allocated within Wirral's Unitary Development Plan (UDP). Policy EM8 - only permits development within Use Classes B1 - business use, B2 - general industrial, and B8- storage and distribution, subject to Policy EM6 and Policy EM7.

The NPPF and Policy CS17 in the emerging Core Strategy are also material considerations. The Government wants the planning system to do all that it can to support sustainable economic growth, but it also expects planning policies to avoid long term protection of employment premises where there is no reasonable prospect of a site being used for that purpose (paragraph 22). This is reflected in Policy CS17 which includes provision for alternative uses where the site is not suitable for the priority sectors, marketing at realistic prices for employment uses has been undertaken and the proposed use is compatible with the character of the area.

The NPPF states that there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development. Paragraph 11 of the NPPF states; Planning law requires that applications for planning permission must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

As the development for three residential dwellings is a departure from the development plan the applicant has submitted a marketing analysis in support of the application that provides evidence that the site has been marketed as industrial land in excess of 12 months without any real interest. The applicant states that Harper and Woods were appointed to market the site for sale as industrial development land. The site was added to their sales brochures and online literature in addition to a sales board being erected on the perimeter of the site from September 2014 to April 2015. In January 2015 following little direct interest, Keystone Properties, a local estate agents were also instructed to market the land adding the plot to its advertisements in local press and estate Gazette from January to June 2015. Feedback from both agents suggests that the plot was considered too small for useful industrial development land and in an undesirable location for a possible storage use.

They also site that a protracted and slow economic recovery has resulted in a very challenging leasing environment for industrial units in Birkenhead and that there are a number of industrial units in close proximity to the site, as such there is little demand for additional units to be created.

This marketing analysis is considered to be a material consideration that weighs in favour of the development. The applicant has demonstrated that there is no real prospect that the site can be developed for industrial uses and statement submitted in support of the scheme backs this up.

The site is located within a sustainable location with good transport links to Birkenhead Town Centre and beyond. Birkenhead Park train station is a 5 minute walk from the site and there is a frequent bus running long Duke Street. The NPPF states that housing applications should be considered in the context of the presumption in favour of sustainable development (para 49) and deliver a wide choice of high quality homes, widen opportunities for home ownership and create sustainable, inclusive and mixed communities (para 50). The scheme will deliver a sustainable development of three two bedroom houses.

Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, and Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The site is an undeveloped brownfield site within the industrial area that currently detracts from the overall character of the area due to its unkempt appearance. It is considered that the proposed development will bring the site back into use and provide sustainable development in accordance with the principles of the NPPF.

As stated above the site is located at the end of a row of terrace dwellings and the re-development of the currently vacant site would logically follow the row of existing terrace dwellings. Previous consent has been granted on the site for outline permission for 3 dwellings (OUT/96/6232/E) and historically the records show that the site originally accommodated three dwelling houses. Whilst the site is relatively small the size and scale of the dwellings will be comparable to those surrounding the site and achieve an acceptable level of private amenity space at the rear.

The proposed dwellings can be deemed acceptable having regard to Policy HS4 - New Housing Development. The scale relates well to surrounding property, in particular with regard to existing densities and form. The area is mixed with both commercial and residential properties lying next to each other therefore the proposal will not result in a detrimental change in the character of the area. Appropriate landscaping and boundary treatment which relates the proposed development to its surroundings has been provided. Each dwelling has a small defensible space at the front and a private garden area at the rear.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Separation distances are easily met. All windows are located at the front and rear of the proposed dwellings. There is a single storey industrial building some 27m to the front of the site and the closest residential properties to the rear are located over 30m away on Cleveland Street

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal. The scheme is acceptable in terms of road safety and traffic management.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no environmental/sustainability issues

CONCLUSION Whilst the development is a departure from the development plan as the site is designated as industrial within the UDP, there are material factors, in this particular case, that weigh in favour of the scheme. The site has been marketed for 12 months for industrial uses without interest, there is a historic permission for 3 dwellings on the site and the land previously accommodated housing. There is a mix of uses in the area including industrial, commercial and residential as the development will continue a row of terraced dwellings. As such the development is considered acceptable in this instance. The development is acceptable in terms of the principles set out in the NPPF and is therefore recommended for approval.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the rel evant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

Whilst the development is a departure from the development plan as the site is designated as industrial within the UDP, there are material factors that weigh in favour of the scheme. The site has been marketed for 12 months for industrial uses without inte rest, there is a historic permission for 3 dwellings on the site and the land previously accommodated housing. There is a mix of uses in the area including industrial, commercial and residential as the development will continue a row of terraced dwellings. As such the development is considered acceptable in this instance. The development is acceptable in terms of the principles set out in the NPPF and is therefore recommended for approval.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 6356/02a and listed as follows: (Dated 07.15)

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. Before any construction commences, samples of the facing/roofing/window materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

4. No development shall take place until an assessment is carried out in accordance with authoritative technical guidance (CLR11). If any contamination posing unacceptable risks is then found, a report specifying the measures to be taken to remediate the site to render it suitable for the approved use shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The site shall be remediated in accordance with the approved measures and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved b y the Local Planning Authority. If during the course of development any contamination poising unacceptable risk is found which has not been previously identified, additional measures for the remediation of the land shall be submitted to and approved in wri ting by the Local Planning Authority. The remediation of the site shall incorporate the approved additional measures and a verification report shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority

Reason: To mitigate against potential contami nation having regards to policy PO5 of Wirral’s UDP

5. No development shall take place until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limi ted resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with Policy WM8 of the Joint Waste Local Plan.

6. Prior to the first occupation of the dwellings arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle acce ss thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the local planning authority. the approved details shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority.

Reason: to ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to Policy WM9 of the Joint Waste Local Plan.

Last Comments By: 16/09/2015 13:54:23 Expiry Date: 29/09/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01087 South Team Mr K Spilsbury Bebington

Location: BEBINGTON SERVICE STATION, 152 KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ Proposal: Demolition of the existing service station, and redevelopment to provide a new petrol filling station facility, comprising of canopy/forecourt, sales building with ATM, underground storage tanks, associated parking, landscaping and other ancillary works. Applicant: Rontec Service Stations 1A Limited Agent : Rapleys LLP

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History:

Location: Total Services, KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: To amend opening hours of the store to 06.00-23.00 hour trading Monday-Sunday Application No: APP/12/00232 Decision Date: 04/05/2012 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Total Services, KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Application to vary condition 10 of planning approval App/1998/5692 to allow trading from 06:00 to midnight. Application No: APP/13/00595 Decision Date: 28/06/2013 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Total Services, KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: The Retention of a Free Standing Automated Teller Machine and Bollards Application No: APP/13/01423 Decision Date: 17/01/2014 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Total Services, KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Remove Condition 1 of planning permission APP/13/00595 to allow opening hours of 06:00 - midnight

Application No: APP/14/00534 Decision Date: 18/06/2014 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Totalfina Petrol Filling Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington, Wirral, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Advertisement Consent Proposal: Erection of an illuminated box sign Application No: ADV/03/05077 Decision Date: 05/03/2003 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Totalfina Petrol Filling Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington, Wirral, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of freestanding ATM building Application No: APP/03/05078 Decision Date: 17/04/2003 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington, L63 8EZ. Application Type: Advertisement Consent Proposal: Retention of pole sign and illuminated signs for shop, car wash and south elevation of canopy. Application No: ADV/93/06609 Decision Date: 25/04/1994 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington, Wirral, L63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of new sales building and lifting canopy to give headroom of 4.5m & refrigeration plant area (amended description). Application No: APP/98/05692 Decision Date: 20/10/1998 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington. L63 8PZ Application Type: Advertisement Consent Proposal: Erection of illuminated pump spreader units. Application No: ADV/90/06156 Decision Date: 20/07/1990 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Lane, Higher Bebington. L63 8PZ Application Type: Advertisement Consent Proposal: Erection of sign on north elevation. Erection of fascia sign on south elevation, shop sign on south elevation, and relocation of pole sign. Application No: ADV/89/07321 Decision Date: 14/02/1990 Decision Type: Refuse

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington. L63 8PZ Application Type: Advertisement Consent Proposal: Erection of illuminated fascia signs on canopy and sales building. Application No: ADV/89/06354 Decision Date: 05/09/1989 Decision Type: Refuse

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington. L63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of a new control building, canopy, carwash and pump island. Application No: APP/88/05824 Decision Date: 21/07/1988 Decision Type: Refuse

Location: Total Services, KINGS ROAD, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: To amend opening hours to allow 24 hour trading Application No: APP/13/00287 Decision Date: 30/04/2013 Decision Type: Withdrawn

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington,Wirral,L63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of a bungalow. Application No: APP/82/20328 Decision Date: 02/02/1983 Decision Type: Withdrawn

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road, Higher Bebington. L63 8PZ Application Type: Advertisement Consent Proposal: Erection of illuminated signs to canopy, shop, pumps and carwash. Application No: ADV/89/07357 Decision Date: 29/11/1989 Decision Type: Withdrawn

Location: Bebington Service Station, Kings Road ,Bebington ,L63 8PZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Liquid Petroleum Gas (1000 kg max.) storage compound to existing petrol filling station Application No: APP/83/23959 Decision Date: 19/01/1984 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 61 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report six letters of objection has been received from the occupiers of the Co-operative food store, 144, 150, 171 Kings Road and 9 Orchard Way. The objections are summarised as follows:

1. concern over the trading impact on the Co-op and other shops within the parade and on the defined centres within the area 2. The robustness of the retail assessment 3. Requirement for impact assessment 4. Impact of the new development on neighbours in terms of noise and disturbance, 5. Increased litter, 6. The design being out of character with the surrounding area 7. The impact upon local shops in the area. 8. The occupier of 150 Kings Road has also spotted a number of errors in the plan that have been rectified by the applicant following discussions with the LPA.

The Co-operative Food division have objected to the scheme on the grounds of the trading impact upon its own food store on the opposite side of Kings Road, and on other convenience stores in the area and within defined centres. They state that the trade from the new food store will be from further afield than the 1km catchment area and that the applicant must clearly define and provide evidence for the size of the catchment area.

They consider that the PFS facilities will draw trade from a wide geographical area due to the nature of PFS trade. In addition, the facility may also provide for top up shopping needs of a localised walking catchment in this location.

In terms of impact assessment the Co-operative has suggested that the LPA must follow the emerging development plan policy CS28 from the Core Strategy which on adoption will require an impact assessment for convenience goods floorspace over 200 sq.m.

Councillor Jerry Williams has also taken the application out of delegation stating the development is an overdevelopment and local residents have concerns over the consequences of the development.

CONSULTATIONS: Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division ) - No Objections

Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No Objections

United Utilities - A public sewer crosses the site and drainage conditions are required

Director’s Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE Councillor Jerry Williams requested that this application be taken out of delegation on the grounds that the development is an overdevelopment and local residents have concerns over the consequences of the development.

INTRODUCTION The proposed development is for the demolition of the existing service station, and redevelopment to provide a new petrol filling station facility, comprising of canopy/fore court, sales building (A1 Use Class) with ATM, underground storage tanks, associated parking, landscaping and other ancillary works.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The main principles for new retail development in UDP Policy SHO1 is to sustain and enhance the vitality and viability of key town centres, traditional suburban centres and other shopping provision and ensure easy access by a choice of transport modes. The site is located within a small shopping centre in a Primarily Residential Area where UDP Policies HS15 and SH4 would permit small retail development subject to criteria that includes protection for the neighbours’ amenity and the character of the area. As the site is not within a defined town centre, the proposal is also subject to UDP Policies SH9 and SH10 Out-of Centre and Edge-of Centre Retail Development where retail development will only be permitted if the benefits outweigh the disadvantages when assessed against criteria, which is set out below under the Policy Context.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The premises is an existing Total self-service petrol filling station (PFS) located on Kings Road in Bebington. There is an associated shop and car wish attached to the premises as well as 4 petrol pumps on the fore court and a self-service tyre pressure and pump facility.

The Acorn public house lies to the south and there is a small parade of shops opposite, including newsagents, cafe and co-operative food store.

It is considered that there are a mix of uses located within the surrounding area, comprising of residential properties to the north and west. To the south of the site lies The Acorn public house. In addition, on the opposite side of Kings Road there is a parade of shops including a newsagent's, cafe and co-operative convenience store.

POLICY CONTEXT The site is located within a Primarily Residential Area in Bebington Ward and as such UDP Policy HS15 – Non Residential Uses in Primarily Residential Area is directly relevant. This states that within the Primarily Residential Areas as defined on the Proposals Map, proposals for small-scale built development and changes of use for non-residential uses will only be permitted where the proposal will not:

i. be of such scale as to be inappropriate to surrounding development; ii. result in a detrimental change in the character of the area; and, iii. cause nuisance to neighbouring uses, particularly in respect of noise and disturbance, on street parking and deliveries by vehicles.

Proposals should make adequate provision for off-street car parking standards and servicing requirements.

UDP Policy SH01 – Principles for New Retail Development In considering proposals for new retail development, the local planning authority will seek to sustain and enhance the vitality and viability of key town centres, traditional suburban centres and other shopping provision in the borough and ensure that people have easy access by a choice of transport modes to a wide range of shopping provision.

UDP Policy SH4 – Small Shopping Centres & Parades Retail development is permitted where the proposal does not cause nuisance to neighbouring uses, or lead to loss of amenity, particularly in respect of noise and disturbance, on-street parking or delivery vehicles – where necessary a suitable condition will be imposed on hours of opening/ operation.

UDP Policy SH8 – Criteria for Shop Fronts Proposals including new shop fronts where company colours, logos and advertising are compatible with the character of the area, any security shutters are painted and perforated in design, and the new shop is fully accessible by people with disabilities.

Policy SH9 – Criteria for Out of Centre & Edge of Centre Retail Development The site is not designated as part of key town centre of traditional suburban centre. In which case out of centre or edge of centre retail development could only be permitted where the Local Planning Authority is satisfied (A), that the benefits of the proposal outweigh the disadvantages when assessed against the following criteria; and (B), the proposal satisfies all the additional criteria in Policy SH10:

(i) the proposal, together with other recent or proposed retail development does not undermine the vitality and viability of any Key Town Centre or Traditional Suburban Centre as a whole or other town centre outside the Borough boundary;

(ii) the extent to which retail development on the site would confer urban regeneration or environmental benefits when compared with:

(a) alternative uses for the site; and (b) alternative sites elsewhere capable of accommodating the proposed development;

(iii) the proposal is accessible by a choice of mode of transport and is easily accessible for pedestrians, disabled people and cyclists from the surrounding area;

(iv) the proposal does not have any adverse effect on overall travel and car use.

The Local Planning Authority may request that a developer submits an assessment of retail impact where it considers that this would be of assistance in considering the effect of an out-of-centre or edge-of-centre proposal on the vitality and viability of a nearby Key Town Centre or Traditional Suburban Centre.

UDP Policy SH10 - Design and Location of Out-of-Centre and Edge-of-Centre Retail Development Proposals should not generate excess traffic; provide adequate access, servicing, off street parking and cycle parking; siting, scale, design and choice of materials should be appropriate to the character of the area and the proposal should not cause nuisance to neighbouring uses.

The proposal is considered to comply with Policy SH10 as the traffic generated by the proposal can be satisfactorily accommodated on the highway network and that adequate parking, servicing and cycle parking facilities will be provided. The layout, scale, and design of the proposed retail store are appropriate to the character of the surrounding area and will not cause nuisance to neighbouring uses.

Joint Waste Local Plan Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, and Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling.

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) Both UDP Policy SH4 and Policy SH9 are partially updated by subsequent changes in national planning policy, in which NPPF paragraph 27 makes it clear that applications of this type should be refused if it fails the sequential test or if it is likely to have a significant adverse impact on planned town centre investment, and town centre vitality and viability.

In addition to this, planning decisions when promoting healthy communities are expected to guard against the loss of valued facilities where this would reduce the community’s ability to meet its daily needs and to ensure shops are able to develop and modernise in a sustainable way and be retained for community benefit (NPPF, paragraph 70 refers).

Retail Policy Implications. The forecourt shop / sales building of the existing service station currently consists of 92 sqm gross floorspace and 52 sqm net sales space, selling a limited range of grocery and vehicle related products. The scheme proposed through this planning application would increase the gross floor area of the forecourt shop by 277 sqm and the net sales area by 188 sqm, to provide a total gross floorspace of 369 sqm and a net sales area of 240 sqm.

The applicant has submitted a Sequential Assessment that identified three available properties with estimated floor spaces ranging from 72m 2 to 77m 2 at 220, 224 and 226 Bebington Rd within the Dacre Hill Traditional Suburban Centre, which are approximately 1.6km from the application site. It can be accepted that these sites would not, in this case, be suitable for the proposed development due to their limited size. Although, the new development is likely to attract passing trade from motorists that use the petrol station, it is also likely to attract walk in custom from the surrounding residential area. Thus, it can be considered that the limited catchment to include the nearest centre can be justified, having regard to existing retail stores of this size and nature.

In areas where there is no locally set floorspace threshold for requiring a retail impact assessment the default threshold in NPPF is 2,500m 2. The emerging Core Strategy is subject to change and the Council has undertaken consultation on proposed modifications to Policy CS28 which would set the threshold at 500m 2 for retail development within the catchment of a local centre. The gross floorspace for the new development would be 369m 2; therefore it would be unreasonable in this particular case to require an impact assessment on any designated centre.

While the proposed development has the potential to have some impact on the trading of other stores within the vicinity of the site, it is considered unlikely that the increase in floorspace above the existing fore-court shop is likely to have a significant adverse impact.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES At the time of writing this report objections have been received from the occupiers of the Co-operative food store, 144, 150, 171 Kings Road and 9 Orchard Way. The main thrust of the objections other than those by Co-operative that have been dealt with above relate to impact of the new development on neighbours in terms of noise and disturbance, increased litter, the design being out of character with the surrounding area and the impact upon local shops in the area. The occupier of 150 Kings Road has also spotted a number of errors in the plan that have been rectified by the applicant following discussions with the LPA.

The impact of the proposed retaining wall and the construction work on the land adjacent to 150 Kings Road will be controlled through condition should members be minded to approve the scheme. Following concern from local residents the applicant has agreed that the embankment will be reduced and re-graded in the course of the development, allowing for a smaller, less dominant retaining wall (no higher than 2.5m) to be constructed.

The Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) has been consulted with regards the potential for noise and disturbance as a result of ATM, increased activity and plant machinery and no objections have been raised. A refusal on those grounds could therefore not be sustained.

In terms of design the proposed PFS and associated A1 retail unit are simple and functional in appearance. The new sales building will be modern in appearance with windows that face both the fore court and turn the corner and address Kings Road. The building whilst being bigger than the existing will improve upon the overall appearance of the site and should members be minded to approve the scheme a condition is imposed to secure materials. The canopy over the fore court will be reduced in size allowing light to penetrate into the site and therefore enhance the overall appearance of a currently tired facility. The area is made up of a mix of uses, including both commercial (Acorn Public House, small parade of shops) and residential properties within close proximity to the site. It is considered the proposed facility will enhance the site as a whole without detriment to the character of the area.

The overall bulk and massing of the new building is deemed acceptable as the site is somewhat lower than the adjoining dwelling 150 Kings Road. The landscaped area to the north of the site will be retained and a condition for landscaping will be imposed should members be minded to approve the proposed scheme.

There is no evidence to suggest the development will result in increased litter in the area. In any case this is not a planning matter and as such a refusal on those grounds could not be sustained.

United Utilities suggest that a public sewer crosses the site, and that building over the sewer may not be permitted. Records obtained by the developer from United Utilities indicate that only a foul water drain is situated within the site boundary. Plans provided in a report submitted to the LPA following consultation with the agent indicate that the drain is located away from the proposed building/canopy. This however is a matter to be dealt with by the applicant and United Utilities and does not affect the recommendation in planning terms.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Separation distances do not apply in this instance, as no residential properties will be adversely affected by the proposed development.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) has raised no objections to the proposed scheme

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals.

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application.

CONCLUSION It is considered that the proposed development is acceptable in terms of the criteria set out in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan, the Waste Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework and is therefore recommended for approval subject to conditions.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and the Waste Local Plan (adopted July 2013) and all relevant material consid erations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

It is considered that the proposed development is acceptable in terms of the criteria set out in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework and is therefore recommended for approval subject to conditions.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 6th October 2015 and listed as follows: 150515_PL4C (Dated 09/15), 150515_PL3D (Dated 09/15) & 150515_PL5A (Dated 07/15)

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. Before any construction commences, samples of the facing/roofing/window materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submit ted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS15 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

4. A scheme of planting to provide a screen along the northern boundary of the site consisting predominantly of evergreens or other suitable plants capable of growth to a height of 5 metres shall be carried out in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any work is commenced and the screen to be provided shall be subsequently maintained to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority. The approved scheme shall be fully implemented in the first planting season following commencement of any part of the approved development, and replacement planting shall be provided as necessary until the screen is fully established.

Reason : To ensure that proposed development/use does not prejudice the amenity of the locality and to ensure a proper standard of separation from neighbouring properties.

5. The area(s) so designated within the site shall be suitably landscaped in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any works commence on site, the landscape work to be completed during the first availa ble planting season following completion of the development hereby approved and shall be maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority.

The detailed landscaping plans shall include:

(i) details of boundary treatments and hard surfaces (ii) the location, size and species of all trees to be planted (iii) the location, size, species and density of all shrub and ground cover planting (iv) a schedule of implementation

Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure that t he development complies with Policy HS15 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

6. Detailed drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any work is commenced to indicate the finished site and ground floor levels intended at the completion of the development in relation to the existing site levels a nd the levels of the adjoining land and the development shall be carried out and completed in accordance with the details so approved.

Reason: To ensure that the development is satisfactorily sited and designed in relation to adjacent development and the highway and that satisfactory gradients are achieved.

7. No development shall take place until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with Policy WM8 of the Waste Local Plan.

8. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT arrangeme nts for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made for inclusion within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be implemented in full before the development hereby approved is brought into use unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to Policy WM9 of the Waste Local Plan

9. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995 (or any subsequent re-enactment) there shall be no creation of additional floor space, including any additional mezzanine floor space, within the building hereby permitted as shown on the approved plans plan referenced 150515_PL3D (Dated 09/15). The reta il unit, hereby approved, shall have gross internal floor space no greater than 369 sq.m with a net retail floor space no greater than 240sq.m as shown in the approved drawings. Sub division of the unit to form smaller retail outlets is not permitted.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and because an alternative format could have the potential to harm the vitality and viability of existing town centres. This enables the local planning authority to consider the implications of other formats as and when the y may be put forward having regard to Wirral Unitary Development Plan Policy SH9 and National Planning Policy Framework.

10. Notwithstanding the provisions of Class A1 of the schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes Order) 1987 and schedule 2, part 3 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development Order) 2015 (or any subsequent re-enactment), the premises hereby approved shall only be used for the sale of convenience goods (including fuel), (other than those ancil lary to the principal use of the premises). For the purposes of this condition, "ancillary" is defined as not exceeding 15% of the net retail floor space for unit.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and because an alternative format could have the potent ial to harm the vitality and viability of existing town centres. This enables the local planning authority to consider the implications of other formats as and when they may be put forward having regard to Wirral Unitary Development Plan Policy SH9 and the National Planning Policy Framework.

11. No trading shall take place at the premises between the hours of 00:00 midnight - 06:00 hours

Reason: In the interests of residential amenity having regard to Policy HS15 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

12. Servicing and deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 23.00 hours and 07.00 hours Monday to Friday, 23.00 hours and 7.30 hours Saturday, and 23.00 hours and 08.00 on Sunday.

Reason: In the interest of residential amenity having regard to Policy HS15 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan

13. Unless otherwise agreed in writing and in line with the surface water manage hierarchy, no development approved by this permission shall commence until a scheme for the disposal of foul and surface waters for the entire site has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. For the avoidance of doubt this site must be drained on a separate system combining just prior to connection to the public combined sewerage system. Any surface water draining to the public surface water sewer must be restricted to a maximum pass forward flow of 10 l/s. The development shall be completed, maintained and managed in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To ensure a satisf actory form of development and to prevent an undue increase in surface water run-off and to reduce the risk of flooding.

14. Notwithstanding the approved plans details of the vehicle crossing onto Kings Road shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority prior to commencement of the development. The approved plan shall be implemented in full prior to first use and retained as such thereafter.

Reason: In the interest of highway safety.

Last Comments By: 08/09/2015 09:26:07 Expiry Date: 05/10/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01143 South Team Mrs S Day Heswall

Location: 78 DAWSTONE ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 8ND Proposal: Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of two detached dwellings. Amendment to previously withdrawn application ref APP/15/00061 Applicant: Mr & Mrs Ball Agent : SHACK Architecture ltd

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Density and Design Guidelines Area Primarily Residential Area

Planning History:

Location: 78 DAWSTONE ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 8ND Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of two detached dwellings Application No: APP/15/00061 Decision Date: 02/04/2015 Decision Type: Withdrawn by Applicant

Location: 78, Dawstone Road, Gayton. L60 8ND Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Rear dormer windows. Application No: APP/93/06472 Decision Date: 23/09/1993 Decision Type: Permitted development

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regards to the Council's Guidance on Publicity of Applications, 6 letters were sent to neighbouring properties. A Site Notice was also displayed on site. 5 letters of support have been received and 32 letters of objection. The grounds of objection can be summarised as follows:

1. Replacement of a smaller dwelling with larger ones will set a precedent. 2. Rear balconies will lead to overlooking and loss of privacy 3. Loss of trees and greenery will harm the sylvan character of the area 4. The two houses are close together and will have the appearance of one large dwelling 5. Potential increase in on street parking on a blind bend 6. Increase in traffic will lead to an increase in noise and congestion 7. Proposal constitutes garden grabbing which is contrary to planning policy 8. Contrary to Unitary Development Plan policies

CONSULTATIONS: Head of Environment and Regulation (Traffic and Transport Division ) - No objection subject to vehicle crossing informative

Welsh Water - No objection subject to drainage conditions

Heswall Society - Object to the proposals - Size and cumulative massing of the dwellings will be out of character with the surrounding area. Development will result in a loss of trees and will constitute overdevelopment.

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE The application has received over 15 individual letters of objection. Therefore, under the provisions of the Scheme of Delegation for Determining Planning Applications, these proposals must be considered and determined by the Planning Committee.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is for a full application for the demolition of the existing property and the erection of two detached dwellings. a previous application for a similar proposal (APP/15/00061) was withdrawn by the applicant. This current application seeks permission for two dwellings of a reduced scale.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The site lies within a primarily residential area which is also included in the Gayton density and Design Guidelines area.

Any proposals for redevelopment would be considered primarily under Unitary Development Plan Policies HS4 - Criteria for new housing development, HS5 - Density and Design Guidelines 5. Gayton and Policy GR5 Landscaping and new development and GR7 - Trees and New Development. In addition the National Planning Policy Framework will form a material consideration.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The application site is currently occupied by a detached bungalow. The existing building is a long linear building with a steep Arts and Crafts style roof. The footprint of the building runs east to west across the site and is setback some 22m from the Dawstone Road frontage. Access to the site is from Dawstone Road. The site is located at the corner of Dawstone Road and Well Lane. Views into the site and of the existing bungalow are limited due to the mature trees and hedges on the boundary of the site. Well lane to the rear of the site falls away to the south. The surrounding area is a mixture of house types and sizes with no one prevailing size or design. A number of the trees on site are covered by a Tree Preservation Order.

POLICY CONTEXT Policy HS4 of the Unitary Development Plan UDP Policy HS4 requires new housing developments be of a scale and form which relates well to surrounding properties and does not result in a detrimental change in the character of the area, to make satisfactory provision for off street parking and access and to provide appropriate boundary treatment and landscaping.

UDP Policy HS5 sets out the density and design guidelines for new development in the Gayton Area. The site falls within zone 2 where new development is permitted providing it does not exceed 3 dwellings per acre, has plot widths of 30m and is set back 19m from the front of the plot. Existing trees, hedges and banking should be disturbed as little as possible. Thus, new development is not ruled out as a matter of principle, so long as it maintains the characteristics of the area.

UDP Policies GR5 and GR7 aim to retain existing landscaped features that make a positive contribution to the area, whilst supporting and enhancing this with appropriate new landscaping.

Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, and Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling.

The NPPF supports well designed sustainable development which promotes the choice of high quality homes

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The erection of two dwellings on this site is acceptable in principle, so long as the dwellings do not detract from the character of the area and do not harm the amenities of existing properties. A previous application for two dwellings was withdrawn by the applicant to address concerns over size, siting and impact on trees.

The current proposals are for 2 detached dwellings set between 19 and 20m back from the Dawstone Road frontage. The houses have the appearance of two storey at the front, with traditional style dormers set into the rear roof elevation. The houses are of a traditional design with proposed materials of brick, render and tile roof. As there are a mix of houses in the vicinity of the site, ranging from bungalows to three storey, the size and style of building is not out of character with the area.

Whilst the size and design of dwellings varies, the screening of properties provided by existing mature landscaping is a strong feature of the area. Houses are generally set well back from the road, with glimpses afforded through trees and hedges. The application site is no exception to this with a number of mature trees around the boundary of the site with Well Lane and Dawstone Road. Since the submission of the previous application the most significant trees on site have become protected by a Tree Preservation Order. The Guidelines under Policy HS5 seeks to retain this characteristic of mature boundary landscaping through generous building lines and plot frontages.

The application site has a plot frontage of over 60m which is divided between the two plots and the houses would be set back over 19m into the plot. The original application brought plot 2 close to the boundary with Well Lane. This dwelling has been significantly reduced in size so that it is now at least 10m from the boundary with Well Lane. As such the proposals retain the important landscaping around the site, which in turn softens the appearance of the dwelling. The amended position of the dwellings on site ensures that root protection areas around protected trees are outside the footprint of the building.

The height of the buildings has been reduced by approximately 1m since the previous approval. This is combined with a reduction in the width of plot 2, significantly reduces the bulk of the buildings. The roof to each house is hipped which means that there is a strong visual break in the middle of the properties which improves the mass and appearance. Whilst the proposed new houses are no doubt larger than the existing bungalow, they are well designed and will make a positive visual impact on this corner site.

SEPARATION DISTANCES The proposed houses have a rear garden depth of over 20m which will ensure privacy to 18 Well Lane to the rear. The rear first floor balconies are set in from the sides of the plot to ensure that privacy to 76 Dawstone Road is retained. Distances to properties on the north side of Dawstone Road are over 40m.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway objections to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals.

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application.

CONCLUSION The proposed development will provide a positive visual feature on this corner site whilst retaining the existing landscaped characteristics of the area. The proposals are not in conflict with Unitary Development Plan Policies HS4, HS5 Gr5 and GR7 or the National Planning policy framework.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The proposed development will provide a positive visual feature on this corner site whilst retaining the existing landscaped characteristics of the area. The proposals are not in conflict with Unitary Development Plan Policies HS4, HS5 Gr5 and GR7 or the National Planning policy framework.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on August 13th 2015 and listed as follows:A102, A100, A106, A105, A103 and A104

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. Before an y construction commences, samples of the facing and roofing materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in th e construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

4. Detailed drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority before any work is commenced to indicate the finished site and ground floor levels intended at the completion of the development in relation to the existing site levels and the levels of the adjoining land and the development shall be carried out and completed in accordance with the details so approved. (Note: The gradients of any new road or turning area should not exceed 1:25 and those of parking or loading bays should not exceed 1:40).

Reason: To ensure that the development is satisfactorily sited and designed in relation to adjacent development and the highway and that satisfactory gradients are achieved.

5. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unl ess otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with policy WM8 of the Waste Local Plan.

6 PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made for inclusion within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be implemented in full before the development hereby approved is brought into use unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure a s atisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to policy WM9 of the Waste Local Plan

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 02/10/2015 15:48:31 Expiry Date: 08/10/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01166 South Team Miss A McDougall Rock Ferry

Location: Daleside Nursing Home, 136-138 BEBINGTON ROAD, ROCK FERRY, CH42 4QB Proposal: First floor extension to provide three bedrooms (amended proposal) Applicant: Daleside Nursing Home Agent : C W Jones

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History: Location: Daleside Nursing Home, 136-138 BEBINGTON ROAD, ROCK FERRY, CH42 4QB Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Single storey side extension to provide four additional en-suite bedrooms Application No: APP/12/00827 Decision Date: 31/08/2012 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Daleside Nursing Home, 136-138 BEBINGTON ROAD, ROCK FERRY, CH42 4QB Ap plication Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Two storey side extension to provide eight additional en-suite bedrooms.(amended description) Application No: APP/12/01146 Decision Date: 22/11/2012 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Daleside Nursing Home, 136-138 BEBINGTON ROAD, ROCK FERRY, CH42 4QB. Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of 2no. single storey office extensions.

Application No: APP/14/00945 Decision Date: 09/09/2014 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Ashlands Nursing Home, Bebington Road, Rock Ferry. L42 4QB Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Construction of a single storey rear extension to provide five additional bedrooms, bathroom and laundry. Application No: APP/94/05718 Decision Date: 29/06/1994 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Ashlands Nursing Home, 136-138 Bebington Road, Rock Ferry, Wirral, L42 4QB Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of a conservatory Application No : APP/99/05065 Decision Date: 08/03/1999 Decision Type: Approve

Location: Ashlands Nursing Home, 136-138 Bebington Road, Rock Ferry, Wirral, CH42 4QB Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of a conservatory Application No: APP/03/07324 Decision Date: 19/01/2004 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 136 & 138 Bebington Road ,Rock Ferry,L62 5BJ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Conversion of existing houses to Nursing Home Application No: APP/81/19571 Decision Date: 11/02/1982 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 36 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report 11 objections have been received and a qualifying petition of objection. The objections can be summarised as follows:

1. loss of privacy 2. loss of light 3. impact onto gardens 4. parking and highway safety issues 5. waste storage 6. impact on trees

CONSULTATIONS: Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) - No Objections

Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No Objections

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE Councillor Moira McLaughlin has requested that the application be taken out of delegation due to the impact of the extension on existing neighbouring properties. A qualifying petition of objection has also been received containing 48 signatures.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is for the erection of a first floor extension to provide three additional bedrooms to an existing nursing home.

The planning application has been amended since the initial submission securing a reduction of the first floor extension from 6 bedrooms to 3 bedrooms. This reduction is shown on amended plans received by the Council on 16th October 2015.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The proposal is for an extension to an existing nursing home, the principle of development is acceptable.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The existing building is a large three-storey property that is located on Bebington Road and on the corner of Cavendish Drive, the surrounding area is residential in character and there are a number of different property types although the majority are two-storey in scale.

The building has been previously extended in recent years, the proposed extension is located above an existing single storey addition to the north side. There is an access way to the north of the building which leads to a bungalow no.134a Bebington Road, this bungalow is set back on the plot, the neighbouring property no.134 has a blank side elevation facing the application site.

POLICY CONTEXT The proposal is for an extension to an existing nursing home in a residential area and will be assessed in accordance with Wirral's UDP Policies HS4 and HS8.

Policy HS4 states; Proposals for new housing development on allocated sites and within the Primarily Residential Areas shown on the Proposals Map will be permitted subject to the proposal fulfilling all the following criteria:

(i) the proposal being of a scale which relates well to surrounding property, in particular with regard to existing densities and form of development;

(ii) the proposal not resulting in a detrimental change in the character of the area;

(iii) access and services being capable of satisfactory provision, particularly for off-street car parking areas and garages, and adequate vehicular access;

(iv) the provision of appropriate landscaping and boundary treatment which relates the proposed development to its surroundings, paying particular attention to the maintenance of existing natural features and vegetation in accordance with Policy GR5;

(v) the appropriate provision of design features which contribute to a secure environment and reduce the likelihood of crime;

(vi) incorporating provision for accessible public open space and children’s play areas in accordance with Policy GR6; and

(vii) the provision of adequate individual private or communal garden space to each dwelling.

For all proposals whose main elevations are parallel, or nearly so, an adequate distance should be kept between habitable rooms in separate dwellings. In addition, where the gable end of one property fronts onto the rear elevation of another, then an adequate separation should be achieved. Policy HS8 states; Proposals for the development of new residential care or nursing homes, or the conversion of existing buildings to provide residential care or nursing homes will be permitted, subject to the proposal fulfilling all the following criteria:

(i) the proposal being of a scale which relates well to surrounding property;

(ii) the proposal not resulting in an over-concentration of residential care or nursing homes in the area;

(iii) the proposal not resulting in a private dwelling having a residential care or nursing home on both sides; and

(iv) the proposal otherwise complying with Policy HS4 and Policy HS5.

All consents shall be given subject to a condition that they should be implemented within a three year period. Following the growth in the number of sheltered housing schemes in Wirral in the 1980's, there has been a large increase in the number of residential care and nursing homes in the Borough, which fall within Class C2 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987. In part, this reflects the increasing numbers of very elderly people who require closer care than would be possible were they to remain in their own homes.

In addition to care homes for the elderly, with Government policies on care in the community, there will continue to be demand for specialist care homes, for example for people with learning difficulties and for those released from hospitals following treatment for mental illness and drug dependency. It is Government policy for such accommodation to be well integrated in the local community.

This, however, can cause concern where a significant number of such homes are grouped together, or proposals come forward for the conversion of small, modern dwellings.

Whilst the locational requirements for residential care homes - level sites with good access to shops, community facilities and public transport - may be similar to those for sheltered housing, the diversity in the purpose and facilities provided by homes means that some may appropriately be sited in more rural or isolated locations.

To control the concentration of residential care and nursing homes in specific areas of the Borough, Policy HS8 places a time limit of three years on unimplemented permissions. Further guidance on sheltered housing and residential care homes is contained in Supplementary Planning Guidance Note 9. APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The proposal is for a first floor extension to an existing nursing home, the extension will provide three additional bed spaces, the extension is to be built above an existing single storey extension to the north side of the original building. The proposed extension is set back from the front elevation and will when viewed from the front, be partially screened by the existing front elevation, the side elevation will be visible from the north of Bebington Road due to an existing access road leading to no.134a Bebington Road.

The proposed extension comes out from the main side elevation by 2.4m (similar to an existing flat roof extension to the side forward of the proposal) and projects outward from the original rear wall by 8m, the proposed layout of the extension includes three bedrooms which have outlook to the north, giving approximately 14m of outlook to the blank side elevation of no.134 Bebington Road, this is more substantial outlook than some of the existing bedrooms at ground floor.

The property has been extended greatly over recent years, there are numerous single storey extensions that project up to the rear boundary of the site. The proposal does not seek to introduce additional built footprint in terms of loss of land, the extension will be constructed above the existing single storey rear/side extension sited to the north of the building.

The rear elevation of the proposed extension does not contain bedroom windows, there are two windows proposed that serve a hallway which can be conditioned to be fixed and obscurely glazed in order to protect the privacy of residents to the rear.

It is considered that the extension as amended is set sufficient distance from neighbouring residential properties and will not have a dominant impact onto residential dwellings or residential amenity.

There have been concerns raised with regards to the scale of the extension, loss of privacy and parking problems at the site. The plans have been amended to reduce the scale of the extension so that the structure has less impact onto the neighbouring gardens, the reduction of the extension results in less bedroom windows and less bulk to the north side of the building. The site does provide off street parking to the front of the building accessed from Bebington Road and there is also on street parking available within the area, junctions are protected by double yellow lines such as Cavendish Drive.

The proposed extension will not result in loss of parking or garden space as the extension is to be built above an existing single storey element, the extension has been reduced in depth with alterations that will result in less impact than the initial development.

The reduction of the extension as shown on the amended plans, reduces the bulk of the extension and the number of windows that will serve the extension, it is considered that the proposal will not have a detrimental impact onto the character and appearance of the area or the neighbouring properties.

SEPARATION DISTANCES The proposal includes three new windows to the side elevation of the extension these windows look to the north and the blank side gable of no 134 Bebington Road, they also will have visibility over the access road to no 134a Bebington Road and restricted views to the front garden, although there is no direct window to window overlooking.

The rear of the extension includes two hallway windows, these windows are not to habitable rooms, so as to reduce any additional feeling of overlooking it is advised that these two windows are fixed and obscurely glazed up to 1.7m in height.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals.

CONCLUSION The scale of the extension as amended is considered to be appropriate in relation to the existing building, the neighbouring properties and Wirral's UDP Policies HS4 and HS8.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted Feb ruary 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The scale of the extension as amended is considered to be appropriate in relation to the existing building, the neighbouring properties and Wirral's UDP Policies HS4 and HS8.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 16 October 2015 and listed as follows: 2889/2 A.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. On insertion the windows hereby approved at first floor to the west and south facing elevations shall be fitted wi th fixed and obscure glazing up to a height of 1.7m from the finished first floor internal floor level and shall be permanently retained in that condition thereafter.

Reason: Having regard to residential amenity

Last Comments By: 30/10/2015 12:12:09 Expiry Date: 15/10/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01174 North Team Mr P Howson Wallasey

Location: Amenity Open Space, ST NICHOLAS ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE Proposal: Change of Use to Residential Garden Applicant: Mr Nick Small Agent : N/A

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan designation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History:

Location: Park land on the corner of Saltburn Road and St. Nicholas Road, Wallasey Village,CH45 8NQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of an electricity sub-station. Application No: APP/78/09063 Decision Date: 13/03/1978 Decision Type: Refuse

Location: Land adjacent 66 Saltburn Road and 64 St Nicholas' Road, Wallasey Village, Wirral, CH45 8JL Application Type: Work for Council by Council Proposal: Erection of a 2m. high fence. Application No: APP/02/05271 Decision Date: 08/04/2002 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS Having regard to the Council's Guidance for Publicity on Planning Applications, 5 notifications were sent to neighbouring properties and a site notice was displayed. At the time of writing, 23 letters of representation have been received; 9 in favour and 13 against the proposal. A qualifying petition of objection has also been received objection to the proposals. The objections can be summarised as follows:

1. Loss of community amenity 2. Detrimental to the character of the area 3. Insufficient public notice

CONSULTATIONS Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic and Transportation Division) No objections

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE Councillor Leah Fraser objects to the application and would like the application to be determined by the Planning Committee and has asked for the application to be taken out of delegation on the grounds that there is no evidence to substantiate the assertion put forward with the application that the area has been the subject of anti-social behaviour and the area is open and visible. If the area becomes a private garden, enclosed by fencing, then the entry way that runs along the bottom of the site from St Nicholas Road to Malvern Road would result in a tunnel effect, hidden from view that could give rise to anti-social behaviour.

In addition, a qualifying petition of objection signed by 26 people has been received.

INTRODUCTION This application is for the change of use of land directly adjacent to No. 66 Saltburn Road to a domestic garden and the subsequent erection of a brick wall around the site. The site in question would form part of curtilage of No. 66 Saltburn Road.

Over the course of this application amended plans were requested addressing concerns over visual amenity and the character of the area. Amended plans were received and the issues subsequently resolved.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The application is for the change of use of a grassed and tree planted area of open space to a domestic garden within a Primarily Residential Area. The site is not identified for protect as Urban Greenspace or for recreation under Sections 8 and 9 of the Unitary Development Plan. The proposal could be considered acceptable in principle, subject to UDP Policies HS4, GR5 and GR7. However, more recent national planning policy provides protection for existing open space, which is reflected in the emerging Core Strategy.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The land in question comprises of a grassed area which occupies the corner of St Nicholas Road and Saltburn Road. The development site is currently inaccessible to the public and there are railings and locked gate around the curtilage of the site. Five trees exist within the site which do not benefit from any formal protected status.

Saltburn Road is comprised of detached and semi-detached residential dwellings with clear distinctions between architectural style along the southern and northern axis of the street. A number of trees are sited at irregular intervals at the junction with St Nicholas lending an intimate sense of enclosure. St Nicholas Road is comprised of two storey residential dwellings constructed within close proximity of one another of uniform architectural style. The playing fields associated with Wallasey Rugby Club, Harrison Park and playing fields parallel to Leasowe Road are all within a reasonable distance of the site in question.

POLICY CONTEXT The area is not formally designated as Urban Greenspace in the Unitary Development Plan, however, the planning application should be assessed for compliance with UDP Policies HS4 ‘Criteria for New Housing Development’, GR5 ‘Landscaping and New Development’ and UDP Policy GR7 ‘Trees & New Development’ which seek to ensure proposals are compatible with the character of the area and secure protection and enhancement of visual amenity.. This application should also be considered against the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which is a significant material consideration. NPPF paragraph 74 indicates that existing open space should not be built on unless an assessment has been undertaken which has clearly shown the open space or land to be surplus to requirements or the loss resulting from proposed development would be replaced by equivalent or better provision in terms of quantity and quality in a suitable location. The protection of recreational land would also be supported by Policy CS31 in the Core Strategy Proposed Submission Draft, which has been approved as material consideration by the Council for use in determining planning applications.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The land was at one time open to the public but has been fenced off over the past 10 years with railings and locked gates to prevent antisocial behaviour. Whilst not currently accessible to the public, the site has value as visual amenity open space. It is considered that the principal issue in this case is whether the amenity land to be incorporated into the garden of the adjacent house is land that should be retained to preserve the visual amenity of the overall area and/or a useful facility which has positive benefit for nearby residents. The application seeks approval for the erection of a part low rise wall, no more than 1 metre in height, along the northern axis of the site in question and a 1.9 metre high brick wall with timber panel inserts along the south/south-west axis of the site.

In respects of the visual amenities of the area and/or the potential for the area to be used for play or sitting out, it should be noted that the site is currently inaccessible to the public and has been for a number of years as it is surrounded by railings with a locked gate. As such, the site currently affords no useful facility for play or sitting out for nearby residents. There is no other public open space within the Council’s standard of 400 metres walking distance of the site (UDP paragraphs 8.7 to 8.11 refer). residents. The fields at Wallasey Rugby Club (600 metres), Harrison Park (1,000 metres) and the playing fields along Leasowe Road (1,000 metres) are the closest accessible and available amenity and open spaces for the wider community.

The application proposes to enclose the site with a low rise wall and timber fence which would be no more than 1.8 metres in height. As such the proposal is not considered to result in any loss of recreational amenity to neighbouring uses whilst the boundary treatment is not considered to result in a significant impact on this part the street to warrant refusal in this instance.

Other Matters Over the course of this application a qualifying petition and 23 letters of representation were received, 9 of which were in favour and 13 against, summary of comments;

a) Loss of community amenity b) Detrimental to the character of the area c) Insufficient public notice

The site in question is currently inaccessible to the public and has been for a number of years. Furthermore the development site is not designated as a site to be retained for recreational use under the provisions of the Wirral UDP. Residential uses within Primarily Residential Areas are acceptable in principle under the provisions of the UDP as such the erection of a part low rise wall and fencing along the curtilage and the sites use as residential garden is not considered to result in significant detrimental change to the character of the area. A site notice was affixed to the northern perimeter and five notifications were sent out to properties within close proximity to the development site.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Separation distances do not apply in this instance, as no residential properties will be affected by the proposed development.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES The Environmental/Sustainability issues relate to the impact on the character and visual amenity of the area from this proposal.

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application .

CONCLUSION The proposed change of use and subsequent boundary treatment is considered acceptable in principle and will not have a significant adverse impact upon the street scene or character and appearance of the area or the recreational or visual amenity of the neighbouring properties. On balance, the application is considered to be acceptable.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The proposed change of use and subsequent boundary treatment is considered acceptable and will not have a significant adverse impact upon the street scene or character and appearance of the area or the recreational or visual amenity of the neighbouring properties.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 29 October 2015 and listed as follows: EL1/PL1 Proposed Boundary Wall Treatment and Location Plan LP1

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revising, revoking or re-enactin g that Order with or without modification) no garages, outbuildings or enclosure shall be constructed within the applications site without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : In order to protect the character of the area/residential amenities of nearby occupants and to accord with Policies HS4 & GR5 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

4. The external finishes of the development hereby permitted shall match those of the existing building in material, colour, style, bonding and texture.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policies HS4 & GR5 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 06/10/2015 15:39:31 Expiry Date: 30/10/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01182 South Team Mr P Howson Heswall

Location: THE LYDIATE, HESWALL, WIRRAL, MERSEYSIDE, CH60 8PR Proposal: Residential development for two detached dwellings with detached garages including associated landscaping works Applicant: McDermotts [] Ltd Agent : SHACK Architecture ltd

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan designation and policies: Conservation Area (for illustrative purposes) Primarily Residential Area

Planning History: Location: Lydiate Farm, 28 Village Road, Heswall, Wirral, CH60 0DZ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Proposed refurbishments of farm House and associated agricultural buildings to form 5no. dwellings, erection of 2no. new dwellings and alteration to vehicular access Application N o: APP/03/05653 Decision Date: 18/07/2003 Decision Type: Approve

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS Having regard to the Council's Guidance for Publicity on Planning Applications, 29 notifications were sent to neighbouring properties and a site notice was displayed. At the time of writing, a qualifying petition signed by 97 signatures has been received. In addition 5 individual letters of objection have been received, 1 letter of support and 5 with comments that are neither objections nor support. The objections can be summarised as follows:

1. Overdevelopment 2. Detrimental to the character of the area 3. Traffic generation

CONSULTATIONS

Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic and Transportation Division) No objections

Welsh Water No objections

The Heswall Society Object on the grounds that the site is the last remaining field in the old village core and testifies to the historic agricultural character of the village. The Society believes that the proposals do not present themselves as an integral part of the village and the design of the two dwellings fails to take opportunities for improving the quality of the area and the way it functions. The current proposals are unlikely to be regarded as making a positive contribution to the Conservation Area and fail to reinforce the historic identity and character of the village core. A development that reflects the cottage scale of the former farm buildings and cottages would be a more appropriate development for this site.

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE The Council has received a petition of objection signed by 97 signatures. Therefore, under the provisions of the Council's Scheme of Delegation for Determining Applications, this application is required to be considered and determined by the Planning Committee.

INTRODUCTION This application seeks consent for the erection of two detached dwellings with associated detached garages at The Lydiate, Heswall.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The development site in question is situated within a Primarily Residential Area and Conservation Area as shown on the Wirral UDP Proposals Map 2000 where residential development is acceptable in principle subject to compliance with UDP Policies HS4, CHO1, CH2 and CH14.

Section 72 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 places a statutory duty on the Local Planning Authority to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the Conservation Area.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The site in question is situated within the southernmost part of the Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area and comprises of a rough grassed area which is the last remnant of farmland associated with Lydiate Farm. The site tapers to the south and is represented by mature vegetation along its south-west axis.

Properties within the immediate vicinity have a mixed architectural style and form. A large modern dwelling exists immediately north of the development site which severs the relationship with the former farm yard. A number of dwellings have been constructed at irregular angles to the street and are a mix of two storey cottages and single storey bungalows. Red sandstone, slate and cream and white roughcast render are all featured on properties within the immediate vicinity.

POLICY CONTEXT Policy HS4: Criteria for New Housing Development of the Wirral UDP only permits housing development that complies with all of its criteria including a requirement for the seeks to guide development to appropriate scale of the proposals to relate well with surrounding property, to result in no detrimental in the character of the area, to provide satisfactory access and vehicle parking, landscaping and boundary treatment, crime prevention measures and adequate individual or communal garden space for each dwelling.

Policy CHO1: The Protection of Heritage indicates that the Local Planning Authority will pay particular attention to the protection of features and historic areas of distinctive quality and character.

Policy CH2: Development Affecting Conservation Areas seeks development proposals that will preserve or enhance the distinctive characteristics of the area including important views into an out of the area, the general design and layout of the area including the relationship between its buildings, structures, trees and characteristic open spaces and the character and setting of period buildings and other elements which make a positive contribution to the appearance and special character of the area.

Policy CH14: Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area sets out a number of planning objectives including the preservation of the old village core including the setting of its former farm buildings, the character and setting of the surrounding area and the retention of unifying features such as stone walls, narrow lanes and mature landscaping.

Policy GR5: Landscaping and New Development seeks proposals to submit full landscaping proposals including the specification of new planting, the appropriateness in terms of the nature of the of the location of the development, provide for the protection and enhancement of existing features and take full account of the effect of proposals on visibility at access points and local climatic influences.

Policy GR7: Trees and New Development of the Wirral UDP requires new buildings, structures and hard surface areas to be sited to substantially preserve the wooded character of the site or of the surrounding area, provide for the protection of trees of greatest visual or wildlife value and ensure that trees have adequate space to prevent damage to their canopy and root structure. Policy GR7 also seeks to prevent the removal of trees by occupiers of the development to obtain reasonable sunlight to habitable rooms.

Supplementary Planning Guidance SPG28: Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area (which has been updated by the Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan) The Lydiate is noted as part of the original village nucleus in the description of environmental quality in SPG28 para 3.1. UDP Policy CH14 makes it clear that one of the principal planning objectives is to preserve the character of the old village core, including the setting and character of the former farm and cottage scale dwellings. This links back to UDP Policy CH2 which will require any future proposal to demonstrate that the general design and layout of the area including the relationship between buildings and characteristic open spaces can be preserved or enhanced.

Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area Appraisal & Management Plan

Joint Waste Local Plan: Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources, and Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling.

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is a significant material consideration which makes it clear that design is key aspect of sustainable development and that the positive contribution the conservation of heritage assets alongside the desirability of development to contribute to local character and distinctiveness should be taken into account when determining planning applications (paragraphs 56 and 131 refer).

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The application proposes the erection No.2 two storey residential dwellings sited within an ample plot which comprises of the last remnant of farmland associated with Lydiate Farm which sits immediately to the north.

The proposed dwellings are contemporary in style and modest in proportion whilst traditional elements such as pitched roof, bay windows and chimneys are considered to harmonise the proposal within the immediate vicinity and the proposal is considered acceptable in this respect.

Lydiate Farm is represented by a series of simple low rise former agricultural buildings and associated farmhouse constructed from a red sandstone around the former farmyard which have been subsequently been converted into living accommodation under APP/03/05653. Under the previous approval an additional two storey semi-detached residential dwelling, which replicates the simple architectural form of the former agricultural buildings, was permitted thus segregating the relationship between the development site in question and the former farm.

The development site in question is designated as a ‘ green area for retention ’ within Appendix F of the Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area Management Plan. Notwithstanding this designation the Heswall Lower Village Conservation Area Appraisal identifies a number of key green spaces and distinctive character areas whilst the significance of the development site in question is not identified. Paragraph 132 of the NPPF states that when considering the impact of proposed development on the significance of a heritage asset great weight should be given to its conservation. The more important the asset the greater the weight should be.

The proposed dwellings would be located centrally within the plot and would be constructed along a graduated slope which runs down into Station Road in the south. Mature trees and dense hedgerows form the boundary along The Lydiate, as such it is not anticipated that the proposal would reduce the open green aspect of this part the conservation area. The applicant has attempted to address concerns raised by residents and has reduced the height of the scheme whilst areas of green open space have been retained immediately north of the proposal ensuring a degree of openness whilst high quality boundary treatment comprising of low sandstone walls and native tree planting unifies the proposal with its setting.

. The proposal seeks to retain the existing character of the area through the use of existing boundary treatment and additional planting and high quality boundary treatment. The proposed dwellings would be sited within a part of the conservation area characterised by modern built developments and the proposal is therefore considered acceptable in this respect.

Supplementary Guidance states that habitable room windows directly facing each other should be at least 21 metres apart. Main habitable room windows should be at least 14 metres from any blank gable. If there are differences in land levels or where development adjoins that of different ridge height, such as three-storey development adjacent to two-storey property, a greater separation should be provided. For every metre difference in ridge height (or part thereof) the above distances should be increased by 2 metres.

In consideration of neighbouring amenity, the proposed dwellings would be partially obscured from view from dwellings along The Lydiate by the existing and proposed boundary treatment and is acceptable in this respect. The application would meet the above mentioned interface distances and proposes no windows servicing rooms defined as habitable within any side elevation and is acceptable in this respect. The application provides sufficient private amenity space for each dwelling and is acceptable in this respect.

Other Matters Over the course of this application eleven letters of representation were received 5 of which were comments, a further 5 objecting to the proposal and a single letter of support, summary of comments;

a) Overdevelopment b) Detrimental to the character of the area c) Traffic generation

The application site in question is considered to be an ample plot which can accommodate two dwellings with sufficient vehicle parking, turning circle and private amenity space and is not considered to be out of context with the surrounding pattern of development. In in terms of sustainability, the proposal would bring limited economic benefits through construction and delivery of additional housing and help in a social role with its contribution to the supply of housing (the Council’s motoring report shows the supply of housing land to be between 3.1 and 3.5 years based on 2012 household projections. The application retains the green open aspect of the area and is acceptable in this respect.

With respects to concerns regarding traffic generation it is not considered that two additional dwellings would generate significant levels of traffic to warrant refusal whilst the proposal accords with the maximum parking standards as set out within the supplementary planning guidance. Furthermore the Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic and Transportation Division) has raised no objections to the proposal.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Supplementary Guidance states that habitable room windows directly facing each other should be at least 21 metres apart. Main habitable room windows should be at least 14 metres from any blank gable. If there are differences in land levels or where development adjoins that of different ridge height, such as three-storey development adjacent to two-storey property, a greater separation should be provided. For every metre difference in ridge height (or part thereof) the above distances should be increased by 2 metres.

The proposal is not considered to result in direct overlooking or significant loss of privacy in this instance.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There is no highway objection to the proposal

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES Environmental/Sustainability issues relate to the impact on the character and visual amenity of the area from this proposal.

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application.

CONCLUSION The proposed dwellings are considered acceptable in principle and, by virtue of their scale, form, siting, and finished boundary and landscaping treatment would not have a significant adverse impact upon the street scene or character and appearance of the area or the amenity of the neighbouring properties. The application is considered in accordance with the principles of the NPPF and Policies HS4, CH2, CH14, GR5 and GR7 of Wirral’s Unitary Development Plan and all other Supplementary Planning Guidelines.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000), the Waste Local Plan and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The proposed dwellings are considered acceptable in principle and, by vi rtue of their scale, form, siting, and finished boundary and landscaping treatment would not have a significant adverse impact upon the street scene or character and appearance of the area or the amenity of the neighbouring properties. The application is c onsidered in accordance with the principles of the NPPF and Policies HS4, CH2, CH14, GR5 and GR7 of Wirral’s Unitary Development Plan and all other Supplementary Planning Guidelines.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 24 August 2015 and listed as follows: B101, B102, B103, B105, B107, B108, B109 and B100

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. Before any construction commences, samples of the materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan

4. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full un less otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with Policies WM8 of the Waste Local Plan.

5. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the submitted Construction Management and shall be implemented in full during the period of construction and shall not be varied unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: In the interests of highway safety and to accord with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

6. No retained trees, shrubs or hedges shall be cut down, uprooted or destroyed, nor shall any retained tree b e topped or lopped other than in accordance with the approved plans and particulars, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority. Any topping or lopping approved shall be carried out in accordance with British Standard 3998 (Tree Wor k).

If any retained tree, shrub or hedge is removed, uprooted or destroyed or dies, another tree shall be planted at the same place and that tree shall be of such size and species and shall be planted at such time, as may be specified in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

No equipment, machinery or materials shall be brought on to the site for the purpose of the development, until a scheme showing the exact position of protective fencing to enclose all retained trees beyond the outer edge of the overhang of their branches i n accordance with British Standard 5837 (2005): Trees in Relation to Construction, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and; the protective fencing has been erected in accordance with the approved details. This fen cing shall be maintained until all equipment, machinery and surplus materials have been removed from the site. Nothing shall be stored or placed in any area fenced in accordance with this condition and the ground levels within those areas shall not be alte red, nor shall any excavation be made, without the prior written consent of the Local Planning Authority.

In this condition ―retained tree, shrub or hedge means an existing tree, shrub or hedge which is to be retained in accordance with the approved plans and particulars; and the above shall have effect until the expiration of five years from the first occupation or the completion of the development, whichever is the later.

Reason : To enable the Local Planning Authority to ensure the retention of trees on the site in the interests of visual amenity.

7. No development shall commence on site until the trees on the site which are protected by a Tree Preservation Order have been enclosed by protective fencing, in accordance with British Standard 5837 (2005 ): Trees in Relation to Construction. Before the fence is erected its type and position shall be approved with the Local Planning Authority and after it has been erected, it shall be maintained for the duration of the works and no vehicle, plant, temporary building or materials, including raising and or, lowering of ground levels, shall be allowed within the protected areas(s).

Reason : To enable the Local Planning Authority to ensure the protection of trees on the site in the interests of visual amenity.

8. The following activities must not be carried out under any circumstances:

a. No fires shall be lit within 10 metres of the nearest point of the canopy of any retained tree. b. No works shall proceed until the appropriate Tree Protection Barriers are in place, with the exception of initial tree works. c. No equipment, signage, fencing, tree protection barriers, materials, components, vehicles or structures shall be attached to or supported by a retained tree. d. No mixing of cement or use of other materials or substances shall take place within a RPA, or close enough to a RPA that seepage or displacement of those materials or substances could cause then to enter a RPA e. No alterations or variations to the approved works or tree protection schemes shall be carried out without the prior written approval of the LPA.

Reason: To protect trees which are of significant amenity value having regards to policy GR7

9. The hard and soft landscaping scheme hereby approved shall be carried out prior to the occupation of any part of the development or in accordance with a timetable to be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or plants that within a period of five years after planting, are removed, die or become, in the opinion of the Local Planning Aut hority, seriously damaged or defective shall be replaced with others of a species, size and number as originally approved in the first available planting season unless the Local Planning Authority gives its written consent to any variation.

Reason : In the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy DQ3 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

10. Prior to commencement of development details of a surface water management plan shall be submitted to and agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be implemented in full in accordance with the agreed plan and retained as such thereafter.

Reason: In the interest of land drainage having regards to policy WA2

11. No part of the development shall be brought into use un til areas for vehicle parking, turning and manoeuvring have been laid out, demarcated, levelled, surfaced and drained in accordance with the approved plan.

Reason : In the interests of amenity and to accord with Policy HS4 in the in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan

12. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revising, revoking or re-enacting that Order with or without modification) there shall be no enlargement or extension of the dwelling(s) hereby permitted, including any additions or alterations to the roof, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To safeguard the amenities of the occupiers of adjoining property and the area generally and to accord with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

13. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (or any Order revising, revoking or re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no garages, outbuildings or enclosure shall be constructed within the applications site without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : In order to protect the character of the area/residential amenities of nearby occupants and to accord with Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

14. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT arrangements for the sto rage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made for inclusion within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved details shall be implem ented in full before the development hereby approved is brought into use unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to Policy WM9 of the Waste Local Plan

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 07/10/2015 14:16:29 Expiry Date: 19/10/2015 Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01202 North Team Miss A McDougall Claughton

Location: 50 EGERTON ROAD, CLAUGHTON, CH43 1UJ Proposal: Double storey rear extension, raised balcony and garage conversion to annexe room Applicant: Mrs Moira Bridge Agent : SDA Architecture & Surveying

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History: No related planning history

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications, 3 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report 1 objection has been received, listing the following grounds;

1. overhanging property 2. removal of boundary wall 3. impact onto existing window

CONSULTATIONS: No consultations required for this householder development.

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE The agents for this application are SDA Surveyors and Architects, an architect and partner in which is also an elected Member of the Council. As one objection has been received, under the provisions of the Council's Scheme of Delegation for Determining Applications, this application is required to be considered and determined by the Planning Committee.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is for the erection of a two-storey rear extension, with balcony and garage conversion. The plans have been amended following consultation with the agent, the amended plans show the extension brought in from the party boundary to allow room within the site to provide foundations and gutter without overhanging the adjoining dwelling, amended plans were received on 21st October 2015.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The proposal is for extensions and alterations to a dwelling, the principle of development is acceptable.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The existing dwelling is a semi-detached property, the dwelling is located in a residential area and adjoins a property no.52 that is located on a corner. The adjoining property no.52 is currently in the process of constructing a single storey rear extension and a first floor rear extension.

POLICY CONTEXT The proposal is to a dwelling in a residential area, the proposed development will be assessed in accordance with Wirral's UDP Policy HS11.

Policy HS11 states; Proposals for house extensions will be permitted subject to all the following criteria being complied with:

(i) the scale of the extension being appropriate to the size of the plot, not dominating the existing building and not so extensive as to be unneighbourly, particular regard being had to the effect on light to and the outlook from neighbours' habitable rooms and not so arranged as to result in significant overlooking of neighbouring residential property.

(ii) the materials matching or complementing those of the existing building;

(iii) design features such as lintels, sills, eaves and roof form and line matching or complementing those of the existing building;

(iv) dormer windows if used, being restricted to the rear of the dwelling and not projecting above the ridge, nor occupying the full width of the roof;

(v) flat roofs being restricted to the rear or side of the dwelling and only acceptable on single storey extensions;

(vi) where the rear extension is single storey on the party boundary and the existing dwelling semi-detached, the proposed extension projects a maximum of 3.0 metres from the main face of the existing houses;

(vii) where the rear extension is two storey and the existing house semi-detached, the proposed extension is set back at least 2.5 metres from the party boundary;

(viii) to avoid the effect of ‘terracing’, where two storey side extensions are added to the sides of semi-detached houses of similar style with a consistent building line and ground level, the first floor of a two storey side extension should be set back at least 1.5 metres from the common boundary; or at least 1.0 metre from the front elevation and 1.0 metre from the common boundary; or at least 2.0 metres from the front elevation;

(ix) single storey extensions on terraced dwellings allowing an adequate area of amenity space to be retained.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The proposal is for the erection of a two-storey rear extension adjacent to the party boundary, a raised terrace and a garage conversion.

The proposed development contains a number of different elements, the main bulk of the extension is the proposed two-storey rear extension, this is to be built between the existing outrigger and the party boundary with no.50, the extension projects 2.6m out from the rear elevation and does not project any further out than the existing outrigger of no.50. The extension will have a flat roof with a lantern roof light and a full height window with balustrade.

Concern has been raised with regards to the impact of the extension to an existing window at first floor on the adjoining house, this window currently contains obscure glazing (this could be changed without planning consent) however the adjoining house has constructed a single storey rear extension and an extension to the outrigger which will restrict the outlook of this window. It is considered that the proposed extension will have an additional impact onto this window in terms of siting and projection however due to the existing treatment of this window, the extensions at no.52 and the proposed extension having a flat roof, the impact will not be so great as to cause a level of harm that would warrant refusing the application.

The alterations also include a raised patio, this will provide a level access from the original ground floor of the house into the gardens, the terrace is raised 0.5m from the garden level, the levels are the same at the adjoining house, having regard to the extension that has been constructed at the neighbouring property the terrace will not have a detrimental impact.

The conversion of the garage to additional living space does not require consideration under a planning application, the changes do not seek to extend the existing building although there are some external changes to the elevations. The changes proposed to the garage do not impact existing neighbouring properties and are considered appropriate.

SEPARATION DISTANCES The window to the first floor of the rear extension is to an extended bedroom, this window is located approximately 20m from the blank side elevation of no.59 St David Road and therefore meets the Councils separation distances.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals.

CONCLUSION Having regard to the existing relationship between the pair of semi-detached properties, the proposed extension is considered acceptable having regard to scale, outlook and Wirral's UDP Policy HS11.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including natio nal policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

Having regard to the existing relationship between the pair of semi-detached properties, the proposed extension is considered acceptable having regard to scale, outlook and Wirral's UDP Policy HS11.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 3 November 2015 and listed as follows: 103_2015_01 Rev.B & 103_2015_02 Rev.B.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. The external finishes of the development hereby permitted shall match those of the existing building in material, colour, style, bonding and texture.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS11 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

Last Comments By: 06/10/2015 16:35:31 Expiry Date: 22/10/2015 Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01235 North Team Mrs MA Jackson West Kirby and Thurstaston

Location: 2 SHELLEY WAY, WEST KIRBY, CH48 3LQ Proposal: Retention of garden pavilion/summer house (resubmission of APP/14/01323) Applicant: Mrs Pamela David Agent : N/A

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History:

Location: 2, Shelley Way, West Kirby. L48 3LQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Retention of a conservatory at rear. Application No: APP/93/05989 Decision Date: 19/07/1993 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 2 Shelley Way, West Kirby, Wirral, CH48 3LQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Retention of 0.84 metre high fencing around front/side garden. Application No: APP/00/06172 Decision Date: 03/08/2000 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 2 Shelley Way, West Kirby, Wirral, CH48 3LQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of single-storey rear extension Application No: APP/03/06168 Decision Date: 22/09/2003 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 2 Shelley Way, West Kirby, Wirral, CH48 3LQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of single storey rear extension. Application No: APP/05/06222 Decision Date: 22/07/2005 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 2 Shelley Way, West Kirby, Wirral, CH48 3LQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of an extension. Application No: APP/08/06020 Decision Date: 06/08/2008 Decision Type: Approve

Location: 2 SHELLEY WAY, WEST KIRBY, CH48 3LQ Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: Erection of garden pavilion Application No: APP/14/01323 Decision Date: 20/03/2015 Decision Type: Refuse

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS: Having regard to the Council Guidance on Publicity for Applications 3 notifications were sent to adjoining properties. A site notice was also displayed. At the time of writing this report one objection have been received and a letter of support. The objection stated the following:-

1. The nearest part of the pavilion is only 1.4 metres from the fence 2. The overall height of the pavilion is in excess of 3 metres. 3. Visual impact 4. Effect on the character of the neighbourhood 5. Bulk and massing 6. Out of scale and character in terms of its appearance 7. Loss of views.

CONSULTATIONS: None required for this householder application

Director's Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE The application was withdrawn for delegation by Councillor Watt due to the fact that the pavilion already constructed and sited close to the common boundary (and for which permission has already been refused) is of such a scale and height as to be overbearing and is an intrusive and unneighbourly form of development unacceptably impacting on their residential amenity, all contrary to Policy HS11 of Wirral’s adopted Unitary Development Plan.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is a resubmission for the retention of a garden pavilion.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The principle of the development is acceptable subject to Policy HS11 and GB5 of Wirral's Unitary Development Plan, SPG11 and the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The site comprises a detached single storey brick property in an area of similar design. The plot includes a large generous garden. A public footpath runs along the side of the property. The dwelling is situated within a primarily residential area and adjacent to green belt area.

POLICY CONTEXT The application property is located within a Primarily Residential Area. The proposal is assessed against the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that proposals should reflect good design as this is important in achieving sustainable development and should contribute positively to making places better for people.

The proposal relates to the erection of a garden pavilion. Whilst not in the Green Belt, it is adjacent to the Green Belt boundary therefore Policy LA7 is relevant. It is noted that Policy LA7 Criteria for Development at the Urban Fringe states "When considering new development at the edge of the urban area or in other locations which would be clearly visible from the open countryside, the Local Planning Authority will pay special regard to the visual impact of the proposals".

Wirral Unitary Development Plan Policy HS11 relates to house extensions and states that proposals should be designed in such a way as to have no significant adverse effect on the appearance of the original property the character of the area in general or impact on the amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring properties in particular through overlooking, or an adverse effect on the area in general.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES

The submitted plans indicate a height of just less than 3 metres however when measured on site, the proposal exceeds 3 metres and as such planning permission is required. Since the last application was refused a fence has been added along the boundary. Additional wood panelling has also been added to the pavillion. The proposal when measured by the Officer measured 2.54 wide with steps measuring 0.8m. The pavilion in to the highest point measures 3.07m in height.

A representation was received from the neighbouring property Mr and Mrs Thomson at No 4 Shelley Way, the main concerns noted are regarding overpowering blot on the landscape, prevents enjoying the amenity of their garden, overwhelming loss and blotting out the openness of the sky. Also the fence exacerbates the negative impact of the pavilion. The pavilion is visually intrusive from the principal rooms of their house. The structure has been sited too far away from the applicant’s property and out of any principal sight line from their house windows. Further points include:

• The nearest part of the pavilion is only 1.4 metres from the fence • The overall height of the pavilion is in excess of 3 metres. • Visual impact • Effect on the character of the neighbourhood • Bulk and massing • Out of scale and character in terms of its appearance • Loss of views.

The structure is located to the rear of the property, whilst the top of the structure is visible from the adjacent garden, the height of the pavilion is 0.7 metres over permitted development. The effect of the character of the neighbourhood and the amenity of the adjacent property would not be considered affected by a wooden design structure. Regarding loss of views it is considered that the structure has no significant impact than the mature screening and wooden fence already in situ but in any case, the loss of view is not a material planning consideration and is therefore not something that the Council can have regard to.

A letter received from another neighbour at No.6 was in support of the structure. Also a neighbour at No1 Shelley Way has no objection and states that it enhances the garden being of outstanding architectural design. The pavilion is now considered acceptable due to the less significant impact of the structure regarding the fence and the wooden screening. The general principles of Policy HS11 and SPG11 are that extensions should not over dominate the existing property and not be so extensive as to be unneighbourly. The structure is in the rear of the property. The proposal is deemed to be comfortably accommodated well within the plot without detracting from the character of the area. The proposal is not considered to have an adverse impact on the amenities which the occupiers of neighbouring properties can reasonably expect to enjoy. The proposal complies with policies outlined above and is recommended for approval.

SEPARATION DISTANCES There are no separation distances relating to this proposal.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES There are no Environmental/Sustainability issues relating to these proposals.

HEALTH ISSUES There are no health implications relating to this application.

CONCLUSION The proposal is not considered to have an adverse impact on the amenities which the occupiers of the neighbouring properties can reasonably expect to enjoy in terms of loss of privacy or outlook. The proposed extension is not considered detrimental to the character of the area or the character of the host dwelling. The proposal is acceptable in terms of scale and design, complies with the provisions of Policy HS11 of the adopted Wirral Unitary Development Plan, SPG11 and the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted February 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The proposal is not considered to have a harmful visual impact on the street scene, the character of the building of the open appearance of the green belt. The proposal is not considered to have an adverse impact on the amenities which the occupiers of neighbouring properties can reasonably expect to enjoy. The proposal is acceptable in terms of scale and design and complies with Policies HS11 and GB5 of Wirral’s Unitary Development Plan and SPG11.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 9.09.2015 and listed as follows: attachment 1, 15/01235, 9,9,15.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 13/10/2015 13:40:15 Expiry Date: 04/11/2015

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: APP/15/01320 South Team Mrs C Parker Pensby and

Location: Barncroft, LARCHWOOD CLOSE, PENSBY,WIRRAL Proposal: 21 Extra Care apartments including support facilities, car parking and landscaped gardens Applicant: Wirral Partnership Homes T/A Magenta Living Limited Agent : Pozzoni LLP

Site Plan:

© Crown copyright and database rights 2015 Ordnance Survey 100019803 You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

Development Plan allocation and policies: Primarily Residential Area

Planning History:

Location: Barncroft, LARCHWOOD CLOSE, PENSBY Application Type: Full Planning Permission Proposal: 28 Extra care apartments including support facilities, car parking and landscaped garden. Application No: APP/14/01527 Decision Date: 23/02/2015 Decision Type: Withdrawn

Summary Of Representations and Consultations Received:

REPRESENTATIONS Having regard to the Council's Guidance for Publicity on Planning Applications, 116 notifications were sent to neighbouring properties and a site notice was displayed. At the time of writing this report a qualifying petition of objection with 109 signatures has been received stating the following concerns: 1. Residents have health issues and benefit from the calm, secluded situation 2. Barncroft is used as a therapy centre 3. Assessment should be carried out on the ecological and environmental impact of the proposal 4. Impact on wildlife and bat roosts 5. Additional pressure on inadequate drains 6. Parking in the area would be reduced

Individual letters of objection have been received from the occupiers of Pensby Hall, 5 Pensall Drive, 34 Meadow Walk and 22 Larchwood Close objecting to the proposal due to:

1. There are bat roosts in the trees 2. Increase in traffic 3. Disruption caused by construction 4. In filling of open spaces 5. Development is out of character

Heswall Society - The proposal is a significant improvement, however object as further changes could be made to reduce the impact on Pensby Hall.

CONSULTATIONS

Head of Environment & Regulation (Pollution Control Division) - No objection

Head of Environment & Regulation (Traffic & Transportation Division) - No objection

Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service (MEAS) - A further assessment of trees for bat roost potential is required.

United Utilities - No objection subject to conditions relating to drainage

Director’s Comments:

REASON FOR REFERRAL TO PLANNING COMMITTEE A qualifying petition with 109 signatures has been received and under the Council's Scheme of delegation, the application is required to be considered and determined by Planning Committee.

INTRODUCTION The proposal is a full application for a new building to provide 21 extra care apartments including support facilities, car parking and landscaping at the site of Barncroft, Larchwood Close, Pensby. The application is a resubmission of a previously withdrawn proposal on the same site (APP/14/01527). This proposal has been amended to reduce the footprint and scale of the building to take account of the proximity and setting of the adjacent Grade II listed Pensby Hall.

The proposal will provide an extra care facility for over 55's, which will contribute to the demand for units across Wirral. There is currently a shortage of units and the applicant, Magenta Living, in partnership with the Council has a contract with the Homes and Communities Agency to deliver 400 affordable housing units of this type within Wirral.

PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT The site is within a Primarily Residential Area where the principle of a residential development is acceptable subject to the Planning Policies set out below.

SITE AND SURROUNDINGS The access to the site is from Larchwood Close, which is a 'no through' road and the existing building, Barncroft is located adjacent to the east. The site is bounded to the north and west by residential properties and Pensby Hall, a Grade II Listed Building is located to the south. Barncroft currently operates as a care home/retirement facility and the proposed development seeks to provide an extra care provision of affordable housing units.

The site is the existing garden area of Barncroft and is grassed with trees mainly located along the perimeter of the eastern boundary. There are a few trees close to the boundary with Pensby Hall and a chain link type fence that is relatively open in nature allowing views into the site of Pensby Hall. There are several trees located to the west of the site; some are in poor health with some self-seeded scrub and shrubs. More mature trees are located along the western boundary that contributes to the wooded character of this part of the site. There is a Tree Preservation Order on the site and as such, the mature trees will be retained with additional planting proposed to enhance the wooded character of the area.

POLICY CONTEXT Wirral Unitary Development Plan Policy URN1 – Development and Urban Regeneration outlines that in considering development proposals, the local planning authority will be concerned to ensure that full and effective use is made of land within the urban areas.

Policy HSG2 - Affordable Housing makes provision to negotiate with developers and housing associations to encourage affordable housing units within proposals. The proposal will provide 100% affordable housing units either offered for rent at a figure that is a maximum of 80% of the market rent, shared ownership or an equity loan scheme.

Policy HS4 - Criteria for New Housing Development states that proposals should be an appropriate scale that relates well to surrounding property, in particular with regard to existing densities and form of development. The development should not result in a detrimental change in the character of the area and should provide appropriate landscaping and boundary treatment that contributes to a secure environment.

Policy HS7 - Sheltered Housing - States that proposals should be of a scale that relates well to surrounding property and should otherwise comply with Policy HS4.

Policy GR5 - Landscaping and New Development states that in order to secure the protection and enhancement of visual amenity, effective landscaping schemes should be considered.

Policy GR7 -Trees and New Development states that in assessing the protection to be given to trees on development sites the Local Planning Authority will consider the general health, structure, size and life expectancy of trees, their visual value within the locality and their value for nature conservation and will require that buildings, structures and hard surface areas are sited in order to substantially preserve the wooded character of the site or of the surrounding area and provide for the protection of trees of greatest visual or wildlife value.

Policy CH1 - Development Affecting Listed Buildings and Structures - states that development likely to affect a listed building or structure should be of a nature and scale appropriate to retaining the character and design of the building and its setting.

Policy NC7 - Species Protection - states that development which would have an adverse effect on wildlife species will not be permitted unless the LPA is satisfied that the protection of species can be secured through the use of planning conditions and/or planning obligation. An ecology survey has been submitted and assessed as being acceptable by Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service. Further conditions are proposed to ensure protection of protected species.

It is considered that the layout and scale of the proposed building relates well to surrounding residential properties and would not result in a detrimental change in the character of the area in accordance with Polices HS4 and HS7. The design, layout and scale of the new building will not detract from the setting of the listed building, Pensby Hall having regard to Policy CH1. The proposal includes a tree survey which sets out that the trees to be removed offer minimal value in terms of their contribution to the character of the area. It is considered that the removal of the trees that are in poor health is acceptable. Furthermore, the proposal includes a landscaping proposal that show a retained tree line with additional planting to maintain the wooded character of the site. This is in accordance with Policy GR7.

Supplementary Planning Document SPD2 – Designing for Self Contained Flat Development and Conversions

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) supports sustainable housing development which encompasses good design and widens the choice of high quality homes. Development should make a positive contribution to an area and use opportunities to improve the character and quality of an area. Local Planning Authorities should plan for a mix of housing based on current and future demographic trends, market trends and the needs of different groups in the community and identify the size, type, tenure and range of housing that is required in particular locations to reflect local demand.

Waste Local Plan Development Management Policies in the Joint Waste Local Plan for Merseyside and Halton are also applicable. Policy WM8 requires development to incorporate measures for achieving efficient use of resources; Policy WM9 also requires development to provide measures for waste collection and recycling, including home composting. This can be addressed through the use of relevant planning conditions.

APPEARANCE AND AMENITY ISSUES The site is currently a grassed amenity space adjacent to the Barncroft building with the majority of trees located around the edge of the site. The existing building is a plain, purpose built care home that has little architectural merit. The proposed building will be located within close proximity to the existing building to form an 'L' shape creating a central courtyard and parking area. The layout of the building has been influenced by the need to retain a tree line to the west of the site in order to maintain the wooded character of the area. The building will be located 23 metres away from the southern boundary with Pensby Hall. The reduction in the footprint of the building compared to the previous application that was withdrawn, is a significant improvement. The length of the elevation facing Pensby Hall has been reduced and the mass, scale and design of the roof line has been amended to soften the impact. This elevation has been set back to be in line with the existing Barncroft building and introducing gable features to be set back within the elevation help to reduce the visual impact on Pensby Hall. The use of dormer windows and materials including buff bricks create a more domestic appearance that helps to blend with the residential character of the area.

Objections have been received stating that the development is out of character and would infill an open green area. It is acknowledged that the site is grassed with some landscaping, however it is not designated as open greenspace and a landscaping plan has been submitted to show the provision of adequate planting and this will be secured by imposing a condition.

The Heswall Society have recognised that determining the application is a matter of balancing various considerations and suggest that a reduction on the roof pitch would further reduce the impact on Pensby Hall. The building has been designed around the need for achieving ceiling heights to accommodate particular equipment, which influences the pitch of the roof. However, the design considerations help to reduce the impact. For example, the building will be constructed in brick with the first floor windows partly set within the roof space. The window designs vary with a variation in sill size and this combined with the articulation of the elevations, use of gable features, will break up what could otherwise be perceived as a long elevation. In addition, the elevation facing Pensby Hall will be at least 42 metres away and it is considered that the combination of the reduced scale of the building and improved design features reduce the impact on the setting and character of the Grade II Listed Building.

Objections have been received stating that the existing residents benefit from the calm, secluded location and that increase in traffic and disruption due to construction would be an issue. The development would provide an extra care facility to support and provide accommodation for local people. It is not envisaged that the existing residents of Barncroft would be unduly affected. There could be some disruption due to construction however this is not a planning reason to refuse the application. Objections relate to the impact on wildlife, including bat roosts. A further survey will be carried out and conditions are recommended for the consideration of protected species. The issue of inadequate drainage has been raised and a condition is proposed to secure proper drainage and to prevent the risk of flooding and pollution.

It is considered that the layout, scale and design of the proposed building is acceptable having regard to the impact on the occupiers of adjacent properties, the character of the area and the setting of the Grade II Listed Pensby Hall.

SEPARATION DISTANCES Detail here the separation distances achieved. Habitable room windows directly facing each other should be at least 21 metres apart. Main habitable room windows should be at least 14 metres from any blank gable. If there are differences in land levels or where development adjoins that of different ridge height, such as three-storey development adjacent to two-storey property, a greater separation should be provided. For every metre difference in ridge height (or part thereof) the above distances should be increased by 2 metres.

The proposed building will be two storeys in height. There are bungalows to the east of the site in Meadow Walk. The first floor windows in west elevation facing the bungalows will be 24 metres away at the nearest point, increasing to 25 metres. There are two-storey houses to the north in Larchwood Close and the part of the proposed building facing the houses is mainly blank with a non habitable window located 16 metres away. The south elevation faces towards Pensby Hall and is located between 42 and 45 metres away. As such, the usual separation distances are achieved.

HIGHWAY/TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS There are no Highway Implications relating to this proposal.

ENVIRONMENTAL/SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES As set out above, a landscaping plan and tree survey has been submitted with the application that sets out the trees to be removed with additional planting proposals. The trees to be removed are assessed as being in poor health and do not contribute to the character of the area. As a result, their loss is not considered to be harmful to the character of the area. The mature trees that offer more contribution within the site will be retained and along with additional planting will ensure that the wooded character of the area will be enhanced.

An ecology survey has been assessed as acceptable in accordance with Policy NC7. A further bat survey is required to assess the bat roost potential of the trees. It should be noted that the presence of bats does not normally prevent the grant of planning permission, provided that the mitigation and/or compensation measures submitted are satisfactory.

The proposed building has been designed to achieve the latest low carbon emissions and energy efficiency targets for building regulations. The site layout and design principles maximise the use of daylight and passive solar energy with control systems in place to achieve energy savings.

HEALTH ISSUES The proposal is an extra care facility, which aims to contribute to the current demand and the likely growth in this demand due to the ageing population of Wirral with the combination of housing support and care needs. This scheme forms part of a programme of Extra Care Schemes across the borough which are being part funded by both the Council and Homes and Communities Agency to enable more residents with additional support needs to be supported within their localities. There is need for this type of specialist accommodation in this area and such a provision supports both Wirral’s strategic housing and social care priorities.

CONCLUSION The proposed development will provide an extra care facility to meet an identified shortage of housing units of this type in the area. Access to existing transport and community facilities exists and the proposal for 100% affordable housing meets a Borough wide need. The proposed development will not result in any harm to the amenities of the occupiers of adjacent houses and is in keeping with the pattern of development and character of the area. The scale, layout and design of the building will not have a detrimental impact on the setting of the adjacent Grade II Listed Building. The proposal therefore accords with the National Planning Policy Framework and UDP Policies URN1, HS4, HS7, GR5, GR7, CH1 and NC7 and SPD2 and Waste Local Plan Policies WM8 & 9.

Summary of Decision: Having regards to the individual merits of this application the decision to grant Planning Permission has been taken having regards to the relevant Policies and Proposals in the Wirral Unitary Development Plan (Adopted F ebruary 2000) and all relevant material considerations including national policy advice. In reaching this decision the Local Planning Authority has considered the following:-

The proposed development will provide an extra care facility to meet an identi fied shortage of housing units of this type in the area. Access to existing transport and community facilities exists and the proposal for 100% affordable housing meets a Borough wide need. The proposed development will not result in any harm to the ameni ties of the occupiers of adjacent houses and is in keeping with the pattern of development and character of the area. The scale, layout and design of the building will not have a detrimental impact on the setting of the adjacent Grade II Listed Building. The proposal therefore accords with the National Planning Policy Framework and UDP Policies URN1, HS4, HS7, GR5, GR7, CH1 and NC7 and SPD2 and Waste Local Plan Policies WM8 & 9.

Recommended Approve Decision:

Recommended Conditions and Reasons:

1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

Reason : To comply with Section 91 (as amended) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans received by the local planning authority on 2 October 2015 and listed as follows: 14F098/001 dated Jul 14, 14G106/001 and 14G106/002 dated Aug 14, Barn/03 dated Sept 15, P4086 - 001B, P4086 - 002A, P4086 - 003G, P4086 - 004H, P4086 - 005D, P4086 - 006C, P4086 - 007F and P4086 - 008B dated September 2015

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to define the permission.

3. The hard and soft landscaping scheme shown on plan reference numbers P4086 – 008B and Barn/03 dated September 2015 hereby approved shall be carried out prior to the occupation of any part of the development or in accordance with a timetable to be agreed i n writing with the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or plants that within a period of five years after planting, are removed, die or become, in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, seriously damaged or defective shall be replaced with others of a species, size and number as originally approved in the first available planting season unless the Local Planning Authority gives its written consent to any variation.

Reason : In the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy HS15 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

4. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the proposed ground levels and proposed finished floor levels as shown on the approved plans, P4086 – 005D, P4086 – 006C dated September 2015, 14F098/001 dated Jul 14, 14G106/001 and 14G106/002 dated Aug 14 unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance and avoid overlooking having regard to Policy HS4 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

5. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION COMMENCES , samples of the facing and roofing materials to be used in the external construction of this development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved materials shall then be used in the construction of the development.

Reason : To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policies, HS4 and HS7 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

6. NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE until a Site Waste Management Plan, confirming how demolition and construction waste will be recovered and re-used on the site or at other sites, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved Plan shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To ensure that the proposed development would include the re-use of limited resources, and to ensure that the amount of waste for landfill is reduced to accord with Policy WM8 of the Waste Local Plan.

7. PRIOR TO THE FIRST OCCUPATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, arrangements for the storage and disposal of refuse, and vehicle access thereto, shall be made within the curtilage of the site, in accordance with details to be submitted to and agreed in writing by the local planning authority. The approved detail s shall be implemented in full unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority.

Reason: to ensure a satisfactory appearance and adequate standards of hygiene and refuse collection, having regard to Policy WM9 of the waste local plan

8. Before any equipment, machinery or materials are brought onto site, a 1 metre high fence or other barrier as agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority, shall be erected around the outer limit of the crown spread of all trees, hedges or woodlands shown to be retained on the approved plan. Such fencing shall be maintained in a satisfactory manner until the development is completed. During the period of construction, no material shall be stored, fires started or trenches dug within these enclosed areas without the prior consent in writing of the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To prevent damage to the trees/ hedges in the interests of visual amenity and to comply with Policy GR7 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

9. Foul and surface water shall be drained on separate systems.

Reason: To secure proper drainage and to manage the risk of flooding and pollution.

10. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY DEVELOPMENT, a surface water drainage scheme, based on the hierarchy of drainage options in the National Planning Practice Guidance with evidence of an assessment of the site conditions (inclusive of how the scheme shall be managed after completion) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The surface water drainage scheme must be in accordance with the Non-Statutory Technical Standards for Sustainable Drainage Systems (March 2015) or a ny subsequent replacement national standards. In the event of surface water draining to the public surface water sewer, the pass forward flow rate to the public sewer must be restricted to 5l/s.

Reason : To promote sustainable development, secure proper drainage and to manage the risk of flooding and pollution. This condition is imposed in light of policies within the NPPF and NPPG.

11. Montbretia is an invasive species and if found on the site, full details of a scheme for its eradication shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before any building works are commenced. The scheme shall include details that the Montbretia is mechanically grubbed up and buried by a depth of at least 1 metre within the boundary; a timetable for implementation and clearly identify the extent of the Montebretia on a scaled plan. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason : To eradicate Montbretia from the development site, to prevent the spread of the plant through development works and to accord with the aims of Policy NC7 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

12. No tree fel ling, scrub clearance, hedgerow removal, vegetation management or ground clearance shall take place during the period of 1 March to 31 August inclusive unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. If it is necessary to undertake wor ks during the bird breeding season then all buildings, trees, scrub and hedgerows shall be checked by an appropriately experienced ecologist to ensure no breeding birds are present. If present, details of how they will be protected shall be submitted to a nd agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: In the interests of nature conservation having regard to Policy NC7 of the Wirral Unitary Development Plan.

Further Notes for Committee:

Last Comments By: 06/11/2015 08:58:43 Expiry Date: 01/01/2016

Planning Committee 26 November 2015

Reference: Area Team: Case Officer: Ward: N/A North Team Mrs J Malpas

Location: PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE CONSERVATION AREA Proposal: PROPOSED ADOPTION FOR THE LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER FOR RESIDENTIAL HOUSE THAT ARE GRADE II LISTED IN PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE CONSERVTION AREA Applicant: N/A Agent : N/A

REPORT SUMMARY This is an update to the Report of the Strategic Director of Regeneration and Environment, presented to the Planning Committee on 17th September 2015 which sought permission to consult on a proposed Local Listed Building Consent Order (LLBCO) for the Port Sunlight Conservation Area. That report provided a full background and justification for the proposed LLBCO which can be viewed in attachment 1.

This report advises Members about the consultation process and the outcome with the intention to adopt the LLBCO for Port Sunlight Conservation Area.

BACKGROUND In brief, Local Listed Building Consent Orders (LLBCOs) were introduced through the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA 2014) which gave Local Planning Authorities powers to make Legal Orders granting general Listed Building Consent for certain alterations (but not demolitions) to specified listed buildings. These measures are intended to simplify the development and management of listed buildings and came into force in April 2014. The Council has been working with Port Sunlight Village Trust (PSVT) with the support of Historic England to develop the LLBCO for specific buildings in the Port Sunlight Conservation Areas. This LLBCO is the second Order of its kind brought into use in England under the new measures.

The purpose of this LLBCO is to:

i. streamline and clarify the consent process for the most common listed building consent applications for owners in Port Sunlight Village; ii. provide clear and reliable information to empower property owners to address enforcement issues. iii. reduce capacity issues on the Council by reducing time spent on reviewing repetitive listed building consent applications.

The statistics gathered for Port Sunlight Village over the past 13 years demonstrate the most common Listed Building Consent applications were the:

• replacement of rear windows (141 consent applications, including 6 refusals); • replacement of rear doors (120 consent applications); and • installation of a satellite dish (53 consent applications, including 6 refusals and 1 retrospective approval).

Additionally, enforcement issues or other threats to the heritage value of the Village were assessed for inclusion in this Order. These issues included replacement of yard gates, without consent, with inappropriately designed gates. Replacement of yard gates is therefore included in the Order to address the gradual loss of this once ubiquitous heritage feature.

It is hoped that the simplified process of the LLBCO will encourage owners with deteriorated or inappropriate rear windows, rear doors and/or yard gates to re-instate them, to enhance and preserve the listed building's distinctive character within the surrounding of Port Sunlight Village Conservation Area.

With regard to installation of a satellite dish under the LLBCO and its conditions, it is hoped that the approved consent will encourage residents to remove a poorly sited dish (unauthorised or where it visually affects the historic fabric) and/or erect new a new dish in a location that is at a low level, not visible from the public eye or any other viewpoints or the highway and does not detract from its architectural composition of the building.

The consents given under this Order would not go beyond those which might normally be expected to be approved through the conventional Listed Building Consent process. The Council considers that through the adoption of this Order, it will be possible to preserve and enhance the special character of the listed buildings of the Port Sunlight Conservation Area, protecting them from the risk of dilapidation and gradual erosion of the heritage character of the village by encouraging and pro-actively guiding works to enable their restoration or re-instatement, while protecting the features of special interest which contribute to the strong aesthetic and historic character of the area.

EXCLUSIONS Notices submitted under this LLBCO that are deemed by the Local Planning Authority to constitute substantial harm to the special architectural or historic interest of the building (its significance and component heritage values of a listed building or buildings) will fall outside the provisions of this LLBCO. Applicants will be advised to submit a Listed Building Consent application in such cases.

ENGAGEMENT & CONSULTATION PROCESS Following the authorisation to proceed to consultation, work began on compiling a list of postal addresses within the boundary of the proposed Order and on 18 th September 2015, consultation letters were sent out. At the same time ten Site Notices were posted on lampposts within the area and additional site notices were posted in village bulletin boards and the Port Sunlight Village Trust office. Formal consultations were sent out via email to Historic England and Port Sunlight Village Trustees. LLBCO documents were available on the Council website, on the Port Sunlight Village Trust’s website and hard copies at the Bebington Central Library and Council Office (Development Management). All were invited to make comments by writing via email or post.

Two consultation events were held in Port Sunlight village; the first on 7 th October from 1:30 – 3:30 pm and the second on 22 nd October from 5:30 – 7:30 pm. A total of twenty-five residents attended the drop-in consultation sessions and overall the feedback was positive and supportive for the initiative. Comments from the consultation events and from written communication are summarised below.

CONSULTATION OUTCOME

Name Summary of response Action Historic England Welcomes and fully supports the LLBCO was revised to take proposal for the LLBCO. account of ‘Statement of Also had the following minor Reasons’ as suggested by comments: Historic England. Revise the draft order to include a “Statement of Reasons” to explain the LLBCO and describe how the duty to pay “special regard to the special interest of the historic buildings” has been dealt with.

Clarify the link (conditions for use of the Order) between the Order and the schedules (particularly Schedules 3-6). Port Sunlight Village Clarify where the LLBCO (and Publicise web content (on-line Trustees its associated appendices and press release) and provide ‘way forms) will be located on the finding’ to the LLBCO on the Council’s website. Planning Home page for the council . Port Sunlight Resident: Was concerned that the window Add a note to each window Mark Cleave details illustrated in the drawings drawing in Appendix 3, in Appendix 4 would not be explaining that window appropriate for his house drawings are schematic, to (regarding cill detail). show approved construction JM and HA explained that the and materials. All details of window drawings were original windows, including cill schematic (unlike the door and details, need to be replicated in yard gate drawings, which are, kind to qualify for work under the saving overall height, width and Order. thickness, construction drawings). He understood, but asked that the point be clarified. Port Sunlight Resident: Thinks the new Draft Order Bill Bowers sounds like a good idea. I know from personal experience that the existing system of obtaining planning permission, can be a drawn out and expensive procedure. Anything to reduce the cost and simplify the procedure has to be a good thing!

I am sure this would encourage more residents in the Village who own their property to have necessary repairs/replacements carried out, who may currently be put off by the cost and possible complexity of the current process. Obviously this would also be advantageous for the architectural integrity and proper conservation of the Village. So it would seem to be a win, win situation for all concerned.

I hope the measures go through, and that if prove to be a success, then the scheme could be expanded to cover other areas of maintenance, etc. from the rather restricted range currently up for debate. (I know you have to start somewhere!)

Port Sunlight Resident: Concerned and object to Wirral Council and Port Sunlight Mr & Mr Ashworth designation of leaded light Village Trust will review all windows for the ground floor of properties that are ‘not in the their property. Order,’ including ones assigned Made a formal objection to this leaded light windows (which are designation. presently excluded from the Order) to verify accuracy and consistency. Review and any necessary revisions to the Order will be completed prior to final submission of the Order to the Planning Committee. Port Sunlight Resident: Asked if uPVC windows No action. UPVC replacement Bill and Michelle Akers (designed to match the windows are not appropriate for configuration of the original listed houses in Port Sunlight wood windows) could be Village. included as appropriate replacement windows under the Order. Port Sunlight Resident: Supports the LLBCO and should Applicants will not be able to Richard Carribine be implemented ASAP. To implement the work until the ensure that the consented work Notice has been approved by is implemented correctly the the Council. project needs be supervised, inspected and passed by the Council.

Following public consultation there were only very minor alterations to the LLBCO and appendices 3 and 4.

MONITORING It is a requirement that the proposed Order is subject to continuous monitoring to assess its effectiveness. The LLBCO process requires close liaison with the Council’s Conservation Officer and they will assist in monitoring the success of the Order.

The Council will consider the annual reports on the progress of the LLBCO. The Council may vary the Order, on consideration of a report, in relation to the following matters:

• The buildings included within it, or excluded from it. • Where sufficient evidence merits revision to the original document, revisions to the window types, grouping or operation specified for a property in the Order. • The Conditions appertaining to the Order. • The duration of the Order. • The Council will keep a publicly accessible record of all documents in relation to this Order, and in relation to specific buildings where Consent is exercised under this Order

ADOPTION The adoption route for the LLBCO is governed by Schedule 2A of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 which notes that an LLBCO ‘is of no effect unless it is adopted by resolution of the local planning authority’. It is therefore within the powers of the Strategic Director of the Council to adopt this proposed LLBCO for Port Sunlight Conservation Area.

Any alterations beyond those allowed by the proposed LLBCO would still require planning permission, listed building consent, advertisement consent where necessary, as well as building regulations approval.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS It is noted that the LLBCO is unlikely to result in any direct financial repercussions as no fee is payable for Listed Building Consent applications.

LEGAL IMPLICATIONS There are no direct legal implications arising directly from this report.

RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS: ICT, STAFFING AND ASSETS Resource requirements associated with confirming compliance with the LLBCO and subsequent monitoring can be accommodated within existing staffing resources.

RECOMMENDATION That Planning Committee resolve that the Local Listed Building Consent Order for Port Sunlight is adopted for a period of ten years.

REPORT AUTHOR: Jessica Malpas Conservation Officer telephone: (0151) 691 8274 email: [email protected]

Attachment 1: The proposed Local Listed Building Consent Order (LLBCO) for the Port Sunlight Conservation Area - Planning Committee on 17th September 2015

APPENDICES Port Sunlight Local Listed Building Consent Order (Revised after public consultation 11/11/15)

Appendix 1 - Site Plan Appendix 2 - Addresses & Descriptions Appendix 3 - Schedule of rear windows Appendix 4 - Schematic Rear Window Drawings and Specifications Appendix 5 - Rear Door Drawings and Specifications Appendix 6 - Yard gate drawing & specifications Appendix 7 - Guidance & Procedure Appendix 8 - LLBCO Notice Form

PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER 2015

This order is made pursuant to the Listed Building Act 1990; the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013; the Planning (Local Listed Building Consent Order)( Procedures) Regulations 2014 ; the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas)(Heritage Partnership Agreements) Regulations 2014; the Planning (Listed Buildings) (Certificates of Lawfulness of Proposed Works) Regulations 2014 and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (Listed Buildings Certificates of Lawfulness) (Hearings and Inquiries Procedures) (Consequential Amendments) (England) Order 2014

THE PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER is made on the day of 2015.

1. Listed Buildings Covered by this Order

1.1 All grade II Listed terrace, semi-detached or detached houses in the Port Sunlight Conservation Area are covered by the Local Listed Building Consent Order (LLBCO or Order). These properties are shown on a Site Plan (Appendix 1).

1.2 Applications submitted under this LLBCO that are deemed by the Local Planning Authority to constitute substantial harm to the special architectural or historic interest of the building (its significance and component heritage values of a listed building or buildings) will fall outside the provisions of this LLBCO. (Applicants may choose to submit a Listed Building Consent application in such cases.)

2. Summary of Significance of Properties in Port Sunlight Village

Port Sunlight was founded in 1888 by William Hesketh Lever (later the first Lord Leverhulme) for the employees of his Lever Brothers soap works. He wanted to provide a place where they could live in above average conditions and at a rent they could afford.

Today Port Sunlight is considered to be one of the finest surviving examples of early urban planning in the . Nearly every period of British architectural history is represented here as a revival style domestic design. Over 30 different architects were involved in the creation of the workers’ cottages, public buildings, monuments and memorials, which are set in 130 acres of parkland and gardens.

The village has remained largely intact since its foundation 125 years ago. It became a Designated Conservation Area in 1978 and is the largest of the 26 Conservation Areas on Wirral. Most of the 900 houses and public buildings in the Village were Grade II Listed in 1965. Christ Church (Church Drive) is listed as grade II* and the post war Church Hall (Bridge Street) is not listed. Two sections of the landscape are included in English Heritage’s Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest and the War Memorial is Grade I listed.

While the fronts of the houses were designed to impress in a wide variety of revival style architectural designs, utilising a rich assortment of traditional building materials, the backs of the houses were notably more uniform in both design and material palette. Their defining architectural characteristics are this consistency and repetition of key features such as the back doors, rear windows, yards and outbuildings. Although more uniform in overall appearance, the details and profiles of the features at the backs of the houses reflect the overall character of each block.

See Appendix 2 for a list of addresses included in the LLBCO with their descriptions.

3. Description of the Consented Works under this Order

Wirral Council hereby grants consent for the following alterations/ works to the properties which are covered by this Order.

Consent is granted for alterations or works as specified below (3.1 – 3.4) and subject to the Conditions set out within this Order and its appendices

3.1. Installation of a satellite dish, which works may include relocation of an unauthorised satellite dish.

3.2 Replacement of deteriorated or inappropriate rear windows, these works may include replacement of: -

(a) severely deteriorated rear windows, including:  Timber casement, double-hung and/or Yorkshire sliding windows without leaded lights

(b) inappropriate rear windows including  uPVC or aluminium windows  picture windows  windows with ‘false’ glazing bars  mass-produced ‘heritage’ style windows that bear no relation to the character of the listed building

3.3. Replacement of severely deteriorated or inappropriate rear doors. These works may include replacement of inappropriate rear doors, including:  uPVC or aluminium doors  patio doors or French doors installed without Listed Building Consent  mass-produced ‘heritage’ style doors that bear no relation to the character of the listed building

3.4. Replacement of severely deteriorated or inappropriate yard gates.

Definitions with regards to the above consents:

“Deteriorated” shall mean beyond economic repair and more than three fifths (3/5th) beyond repair. “Inappropriate” shall mean detrimental to the character of the listed property.

4. General Conditions The following General Conditions should be complied with in full. Work Specific and Prescriptive Conditions can be found in Appendices 2-6, inclusive. Guidance on the procedure relating to Notice of works under this Order can be found at Appendix 7. a) Prior to the implementation of works permitted under this Order, a Local Listed Building Consent Order Notice Form shall be submitted to and approved in writing by Wirral Council. b) The LLBCO Notice Form shall contain the applicant's (and where relevant the agent's or contractor’s) contact details, the address of the building to which the works relate, and nature and scope of the works to be undertaken.

5. Specific Conditions This section sets out specific conditions for alterations / works carried out in relation to this Order

5.1. Relocation or Installation of a Satellite Dish 5.1.1 To qualify for consent under this Order either a) the replacement or new dish must be located at the back of the property and positioned at a low level so as not to be visible from the highway or access roads, or b) where low level installation to the back of the property is not possible (for satellite reception), the dish may be installed or replaced on a chimney, positioned below the ridge of the roof and not visible from the front of the property and the highway.

5.1.2 Once location for the relocated or new satellite dish is determined, then ALL of the following conditions must be satisfied: a) The dish must be as small as possible and in no instance larger than 90 centimetres in any linear dimension b) The colour of the dish shall harmonise with the fabric of the building. c) Installation shall not harm or destroy character-defining features. d) A maximum of two cable runs is permitted at the exterior. e) Redundant satellite dish(es) must be permanently removed from the property.

5.2 Replacement of Rear Windows 5.2.1 To qualify for consent under this Order, the rear windows to be replaced must satisfy one of the following conditions:

A: More than 3/5th of the original rear window (frame, stiles, rails and glass) is deteriorated beyond repair or B: The rear window is inappropriate and not of historic interest.

5.2.2 If the replacement relies on Condition ‘A’ above (Deterioration) replacement windows will be approved subject to ALL of the following conditions being met: a) The replacement rear window matches the window TYPE specified in Appendix 3: Rear Window Schedule and the existing original window in all details; profiles and dimensions, configuration, operation, position, location and exterior finish paint or coating. b) The submitted replacement rear window scale drawing must comply with the specifications, materials and construction details of the schematic drawings in Appendix 4. F or further information refer to Appendix 7 for Procedure and the Guidance Notes for Completing a LLBCO Notice Form.

5.2.3 If the replacement relies on Condition ‘B’ above (Inappropriateness) then, replacement windows will be approved subject to ALL of the following conditions being met: a) The replacement rear window matches the window TYPE specified in Appendix 3: Rear Window Schedule and the existing original window in all details; profiles and dimensions, configuration, operation, position, location and exterior finish paint or coating. b) The submitted replacement rear window scale drawing must comply with the specifications, materials and construction details of the schematic drawings in Appendix 4. For further information refer to Appendix 7 for Procedure and the Guidance Notes for Completing a LLBCO Notice Form c) The details (dimensions, profiles and sections) of the replacement windows must match original extant windows found at either: (i) The rear of your property, or (ii) If no original windows remain at the rear, then the replacement windows must match the profiles and dimensions of original, comparable windows found elsewhere in your property. d) If there are no appropriate comparable windows this Order must not be relied upon for the replacement of rear windows.

5.3. Replacement of Rear Doors and Yard Gates. 5.3.1 To qualify for consent under this Order the rear doors and/or yard gates must satisfy at least one of the following conditions:

A: More than 3/5th of the existing rear door (frame, stiles, rails and glass) and/or yard gate should be deteriorated beyond repair. B: The existing rear door and/or yard gate is inappropriate and not of historic interest.

5.3.2 If condition A or B applies, then only the approved replacement doors and yard gate drawn and specified in Appendices 5 and 6 can be used under this Order.

6. Statement of Reasons for the Consented Works 6.1 Satellite Dishes Whilst the satellite dish is not a traditional feature it is reasonably considered that such additions would be expected with residential occupancy of a building. A satellite dish approved under the Order would be discretely positioned at the rear of the property at a low level and not visible from the wider area. Where this is not possible the satellite dish would be attached to the chimney stack below the ridge and not visible from the highway or any other view point. The siting and size described as conditions for using the Order to install a satellite dish are appropriate to minimising the adverse impact to the character of the listed building, as such complies with UDP Policy CH1. It has been demonstrated that adequate provision has been made for the preservation of the special architectural or historic features of the building.

6.2 Rear Doors, Yard Gates and Rear Window The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 sets out a clear presumption that gives considerable importance and weight to the desirability of preserving a heritage asset and its setting. Section 16.2 states that:

“In considering whether to grant listed building consent for any works the local planning authority or the Secretary of State shall have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses”.

The government’s guidance in the NPPF states that “when considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation”. Any development should therefore seek to conserve and enhance the special qualities of the historic asset. This approach is also taken by policies CH1 and CH9 of the Wirral’s UDP which “promote the enhancement of the built environment through the use of high standards of design, sustainable materials; and adequate provision is made for the preservation of the special architectural or historic features of the building or structure.”

Therefore the main issue to be considered is the impact of the alterations on the visual appearance and character of the listed building, and its setting in the Port Sunlight Conservation Area. While the fronts of the houses were designed to impress in a wide variety of revival style architectural designs, utilising a rich assortment of traditional building materials, the backs of the houses were notably more uniform in both design and material palette. Their defining architectural characteristics are consistency and repetition of key features such as the back doors, rear windows, yards and outbuildings. Although more uniform in overall appearance, the details and profiles of the features at the backs of the houses reflect the overall character of each block. When considering building conservation, retention of historic fabric is an important aspect to consider.

Windows are often a key element of a building’s significance. Their character, including the style of framing, framing materials, and the glazing itself, contributes enormously to the overall appearance and character of historic designated assets especially where the fabric is original or of historic interest. The alteration of windows can cause serious harm to the character and appearance and the special interest of the listed building.

Rear Windows: where it can be demonstrated that the original, historic rear window is in a poor condition and more than three fifths beyond repair, a replacement is acceptable provided that the details are copied like for like in terms of profiles, architraves, and number of panes, operation and configuration. This complies with the NPPF Section 12, Para 132 states that the development should take account of the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.

In the worst case where significance has been harmed or lost through alteration with the installation of inappropriate windows, for example uPVC, aluminium or the wrong configuration, for example picture windows instead of double hung windows, these elements are unsympathetic to the historic character of the property. The proposal to re-instate the correct window configuration and material using original profiles taken from original windows elsewhere in the property is acceptable. Overall, the external changes proposed to the building would improve its heritage character and appearance.

All new windows will be fitted with slim double-glazed units. Slim-profile double glazing systems allow either retention of the existing frame or a new frame with the same dimensions as the original. By using slim-profile double glazing in timber frames there is minimal or no alteration to the profiles or sight lines of the windows and therefore minimal adverse impact to the historic building. The use of slim-line double glazing represents an opportunity for thermal improvement without compromising historic fabric. The justification for the choice of double-glazing is to achieve a significant increase in the thermal performance, an objective in accordance with national policy to achieve greater degrees of energy efficiency to address climate change, and an objective also recognised in paragraph 93 of NPPF; in this context, as a public benefit, the proposals should be afforded significant weight.

Doors & Yard Gates: Where it can be demonstrated that the original, historic rear door or yard gate is severely deteriorated, or is an inappropriate replacement, these features would adversely affect the heritage character and appearance of the listed house. The installation of one of the approved five rear door designs illustrated and specified in Appendix 5 or the approved yard gate design, illustrated and specified in Appendix 6, is acceptable provided that the details are copied like for like in terms of profiles, architraves, number of panes, operation and configuration, subject to existing dimensions of openings.

7. Purpose of the Order

7.1 The purpose of this Order is to:  Streamline and clarify the consent process for the most common listed building consent applications for owners in Port Sunlight Village;  Provide clear and reliable information to empower property owners to address enforcement issues;  Reduce capacity issues on the Council by reducing time spent on reviewing repetitive listed building consent applications.

7.2 Statistics gathered for the Village over the past 13 years demonstrate the most common Listed Building Consent applications in Port Sunlight village to be:  replacement of rear windows (141 consent applications, including 6 refusals);  replacement of rear doors (120 consent applications); and  installation of a satellite dish (53 consent applications, including 6 refusals and 1 retrospective approval). 7.3 Additionally, enforcement issues or other threats to the heritage value of the Village were assessed for inclusion in this Order. These issues included replacement of yard gates, without consent, with inappropriately designed gates. Replacement of yard gates is therefore included in the Order to address the gradual loss of this once ubiquitous heritage feature.

8. Term of the Order 8.1 This Order shall be effective from and to (a period of no more than 10 years from the starting date of the Order).

8.2 Works begun under this Order during the term of this Order may be completed subsequent to the termination of this Order

THE COMMON SEAL of

WIRRAL BOROUGH COUNCIL was hereunto affixed in the presence of

Authorised Signatory

PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER GUIDANCE FOR COMPLETING THE LLBCO NOTICE FORM Questions 1 and 2 NAME, ADDRESS AND CONTACT DETAILS OF APPLICANT AND AGENT/CONTRACTOR/JOINER A contact telephone number and / or email address must be provided for the applicant and contractor/joiner/agent. Question 3 SITE DETAILS Enter here the full postal address of the property for which the LLBCO Notice is being made. Question 4 ADVICE Wirral Council strongly recommends that applicants seek advice from either the Conservation Officer at the Council or the Port Sunlight Village Trust’s Conservation Adviser prior to making a Notice for works covered by the LLBCO. These heritage professionals can assist you in making an appropriate determination regarding eligibility for works covered under the LLBCO, especially with regard to meeting the ‘severely deteriorated’ threshold for replacing original features (rear windows, rear doors and yard gates).

If you sought advice from Wirral Council or the Port Sunlight Village Trust, please give the name of the person who you spoke to. Question 5 WORKS STARTED PRIOR TO NOTICE Please indicate here if work has started and/or been completed prior to making Notice. If so, please provide the dates for commencement or completion of works as required. Question 6 Proposed Works - Satellite Dish A) Tick this box if you are installing a new satellite dish B) Tick this box if you are relocating an existing satellite dish. C) Enter the diameter of the proposed satellite dish in cm. Please note that only satellite dishes smaller than 90 cm will be approved under the LLBCO. D) Describe the location of the proposed satellite dish. (i.e. The satellite dish be installed on the rear wall of the property, approximately 1 meter above ground level between the kitchen window and the brick boundary wall.) Question 7 Proposed Works – Replace a Yard Gate A) Tick this box if you are replacing a severely deteriorated yard gate (one that is more than 3/5th beyond repair). B) Tick this box if you are replacing an inappropriate yard gate. If you are replacing an inappropriate yard gate, please describe the existing one. (I.e. Existing gate is made of plywood.) Question 8 Proposed Works – Replace a Rear Door A) Tick this box if you are replacing a severely deteriorated rear door (one that is more than 3/5th beyond repair). B) Tick this box if you are replacing an inappropriate rear door and then briefly describe the existing door. (i.e. Existing rear door is made of aluminium and has no heritage character.) Question 9 Proposed Works – Replace a Rear Window(s) Fill in the number of severely deteriorated (more than 3/5th beyond repair) and inappropriate (i.e. wood frame picture windows or uPVC windows) rear windows you are replacing by floor level. Refer to “Appendix 3: Rear Window Schedule” to find the appropriate codes for replacement windows for your property (by floor level) and enter the codes in the appropriate box. Include codes for the replacement rear window material, type, panes of glass and grouping. Question 10 Photographs Check List (Yard Gates, Rear Doors, Rear Windows) In order for the Council to certify your Notice Form to be complete, you must submit all of the photographs in the checklist, including an overall view of the rear façade of your property (for rear windows and doors) or the overall view of your yard gate within the boundary wall (for yard gates only). The purpose of detail interior and exterior photographs is to show the extent of deterioration (for windows to be replaced because of severe deterioration) and the existing profiles (for original windows) to be reproduced. Photographs should be recent (within four weeks of submission of the LLBCO Notice), in colour, clear and in focus and no smaller than 1 MB (Megabyte) and 6” x 4”. Question 11 Photographs Check List (Satellite Dishes) In order for the Council to certify your Notice Form to be complete, you must submit all of the photographs in the checklist, including an overall view of the proposed location for the satellite dish, a detail view of the proposed location (to show that no character-defining features will be lost or damaged through installation of the satellite dish) and sight line photographs to show that the satellite dish will not be visible/will only be minimally visible from the access roads and other public rights of way. Photographs should be recent (within four weeks of submission of the LLBCO Notice), in colour, clear and in focus and no smaller than 1 MB (Megabyte) and 6” x 4” Question 12 Drawings Check List (Rear Windows Only) In order for the Council to certify your Notice Form to be complete, you must submit all of the drawings on the checklist for the proposed windows, including horizontal and vertical sections of the full window assembly (scale at 1:2), glazing bar and architrave profiles (scale at 1:1) and interior elevation (scale at 1:1). Examples of these drawings can be found in Appendix 4: Schematic Rear Window Drawings and Specifications. Submission drawings need not be formal or computer-drafted. Sketches are fine as long as they are accurate, to scale and show dimensions. These drawings will be necessary to manufacture your windows. Question 13 Declaration Both the Applicant and the Agent/Contractor/Joiner should read, agree, sign and date the Declaration.

APPENDIX 2: SCHEDULE OF ADDRESSES WITH ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTIONS PORT SUNLIGHT LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER

1 Bath Street Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in fairfaced brickwork on a stone plinth. Stone lintels and cills, gables in terracotta tile, first floor in polychromatic Date built: 1896 brickwork. Decorative string course and roof in plain clay tile. Number of Houses: 1

3 - 33 Bath Street Description: Architect J Joseph Talbot Cheshire facing brick with buff sandstone dressings. Combination of plain and Dutch gable ends with timber dormer windows. Date built: 1897 Highly decorative copper clad cupola. Ogee capped bays in rolled Number of Houses: 16 leadwork & copper. Strangely classical chimney treatment.

45 - 55 Bebington Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brick work to elevations stone surrounds to windows and doors with detailed lintels. Roof in clay tile. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 6

57 - 65 Bebington Road Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. Central bay is recessed with buttress detail and pebble dashed render to first floor. The roof is Date built: 1899 an interesting clay tile feature. Number of Houses: 5

67 - 79 Bebington Road Description: Architect Ernest Newton Ground floor in sandstone. First floor in pebble dashed render, with clay tile roof. Enclosed timber porches to ends of property. Date built: 1899 Recessed central section. Oversized stone porch to No. 69 and 71 Number of Houses: 7

81 - 87 Bebington Road Description: Architect T M Lockwood Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor and tiling to first floor. Central bay in timber frame. Roof in clay tile with brick chimney Date built: 1899 stacks. Number of Houses: 4

89 - 97 Bebington Road Description: Architect J Joseph Talbot Cheshire facing brick on a sandstone plinth with render panels to first floor. Chimney stacks in brick. Prominent dormers with Date built: 1899 hipped gables & distinctive lead finials. Good condition. Number of Houses: 5

APPENDIX 2: Page 1 99 - 109 Bebington Road Description: Architect Post war reconstruction follow Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with sandstone surrounds to windows and doors. Jacobean influences. Roof in slate with brick Date built: c 1899 chimney stacks. Number of Houses: 6

1 Bolton Road Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in fairfaced brickwork and stone dressings to openings. Dutch gable feature with 'LB' and '1898'. Roof in clay tile with Date built: 1890 leaded and tiled roofs to bay windows. Number of Houses: 1

15 Bolton Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced masonry with stone cills and arched brick. First floor is a mixture of pebble panelling and pargetting to two gables. Tiling to Date built: 1890 roof and entrance porch. Number of Houses: 1

17 - 21 Bolton Road Description: Architect William Owen Ground floor in brickwork with decorative timber porches. First floor and gable ends are pebble dashed. Second floor/roof tiled Date built: 1890 with timber dormer windows. Chimneys in elaborate brickwork. Number of Houses: 9

20 Bolton Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 1 Bath Street. Date built: 1896 Number of Houses: 1

22 - 42 Bolton Road Description: Architect William Owen Brick with stone dressings to ground floor with render & timber frame to first floor. Tiled roof with cedar shingles to some gables. Date built: 1896 Decorative plasterwork to central gables. Chimney stacks in tudor Number of Houses: 11 decorative style.

5 - 7 Bolton Road Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in brickwork with expressed bays. Decorative tile hung gables and clay tiled roof. Date built: 1890 Number of Houses: 2

APPENDIX 2: Page 2 60 - 62 Bolton Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor overhangs ground floor, supported on timber columns and lintel. Detailed chimney Date built: 1914 stacks to end gables. Number of Houses: 2

61 - 69 Bolton Road Description: Architect William Owen Pebble dashed elevations on brickwork plinth with brick tracery detail. Window surrounds, building corners and gable ends all Date built: 1898 have brick tracery detailing. First floor bay windows and leaded Number of Houses: 5 porches add detail. Roof is in clay tiles with diamond orientated brick chimney stacks.

64 - 78 Bolton Road Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Elevations in pebble dashed render supported on brick work with dormer and bay windows. Roof in clay tile with tall brick chimney Date built: 1912 stacks. Number of Houses: 8

71 - 75 Bolton Road Description: Architect Douglas & Minshull Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor and render to first floor. Clay tiles to roof and gable ends. Chimney stacks in varying design. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 3

9 -13 Bolton Road Description: Architect William Owen Asymmetrical elevation in fairfaced brickwork. Clay tiled roof with brick arches. Date built: 1890 Number of Houses: 3

10 - 16 Boundary Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham See 128-132 New Road Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 6

13 - 31 Boundary Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Pebbledash render to elevation supported on a brick plinth. Bay windows in varied timber frame or render pebbledash. Date built: 1905 Interestingly detailed chimney stacks. Number of Houses: 10

APPENDIX 2: Page 3 2 - 8 Boundary Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor. Timber framing to first floor. Timber porches and clay tiled roof. Dormer windows to No. 4 and Date built: 1899 6. Number of Houses: 4

3 - 11 Boundary Road Description: Architect Post war reconstruction by J L Render to ground and first floor supported on brickwork plinth. Protruding bays in timber frames with feature half timbered gable Date built: 1899 to no.3. Roof & porch in clay tile. Single storey part to no.3 was a Number of Houses: 6 shop.

33 Boundary Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in pebble dashed render on a plinth of brick work with bay windows to ground floor. Roof in clay tiles. Date built: 1905 Number of Houses: 1

35 Boundary Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Pebble dashed render to ground floor, supported on a brick plinth. Timber frame to first floor. Roof in clay tiles. Date built: 1905 Number of Houses: 1

37 - 43 Boundary Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor and pebble dashed render to first floor. Sandstone keystone to brick lintels. Roof and porch in Date built: 1905 clay tile. Number of Houses: 5

45-47 Boundary Road Description: Architect Grayson and Ould Brick with roughcast 1st floor and hipped tile roof. 2 storeys, 2 bays, centre projects under 2 gables. Ground floor has windows Date built: 1905 with gauged-brick flat arches and 4-light small- paned casements Number of Houses: 2 with transoms. 1st floor 4-light windows have leaded casements and cornices. Entrances have tile canopies, doors are half-glazed with small-paned lights. Central cross-axial stack with brick cap. Canopy of No. 45 adjoins that of Nos. 37 to43 (q.v.). Rear similar, pebbledash, dormers, privies.

1 - 9 Bridge Street Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Ground floor and first floor in masonry with faceted corner bays and turreted roof. Dutch style brick gables with vertical tile Date built: 1894 hanging. End gables with diamond pattern in brick. Roof and Number of Houses: 5 extended porch in plain tile.

APPENDIX 2: Page 4 16 - 22 Bridge Street Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Ground floor in course red sandstone and first floor in timber framing. Highly decorative gables with barge boarding. Roofing is Date built: 1894 in green Westmorland slate. Chimney have stone bases with Number of Houses: 4 decorative brick circular shafts.

8 - 14 Bridge Street Description: Architect Post war reconstruction follow timber faring elevations on a sandstone plinth. Bay windows to ground floor of No. 8,10 and 12, and first floor of No.14. Date built: 1894 Rebuil Decorative gables and tiled first floor to No. 8. Roof in clay tiles. Number of Houses: 4

3 - 4 Brook Street Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Brick render elevation to ground floor, first floor bays in tile, swept down over entrance porches. Decoration: render Date built: 1906 buttresses and heart shaped motifs to shutters. Number of Houses: 2

5 - 10 Brook Street Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Half timbers elements within rendered elevation above a low brick plinth. Roof in plain clay tile. Prominent brick chimney to Date built: 1901 end elevation of No.10. Number of Houses: 6

1 - 3 Central Road Description: Architect C E Deacon and Horsburgh Elevations in a combination of fairfaced brickwork and pebble dashed surfaces. With timber post and lintels surrounding Date built: 1907 entrance doors. Roofs in red clay tile, flat roofs to protruding Number of Houses: 2 dormer windows. Interesting stepping of gables around corner.

15 - 27 Central Road Description: Architect Garnett, Wright & Barnish Central bay made up of three houses. Advancing bays to each side of two houses each of fairfaced brickwork with decorative Date built: 1907 brick dressing. Tudor chimneys and timber cladding of first floor Number of Houses: 7 of No 19. Pebble dash render to first floor of No. 21 and 23 with Queen Anne style Dutch gables to the first floor dormer windows. Some corners of the property have inclined buttressing.

16 - 34 Central Road Description: Architect F J Barnish Pebble dashed elevations with tiled roof and porches. Date built: 1911 Number of Houses: 10

APPENDIX 2: Page 5 2 - 14 Central Road Description: Architect Bradshaw and Gass Elevation in a Cheshire red brickwork and glue Staffordshire brick to lower walls. With articulated entrance. Roofs are in green Date built: 1906 Westmorland slate with flat roof porches. Number of Houses: 7

36 - 44 Central Road Description: Architect H Blomfield Bare Ground and first floor in render with brick surrounds to doors and windows. Shallow bay windows supported on timber brackets to Date built: 1906 the first floor. Roof in clay tile. Number of Houses: 5

46 - 64 Central Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in render on a brickwork plinth. Timber detailing creates a wide string course. Clay tile to roof with rendered Date built: 1906 chimney stacks & clay pots. Windows with timber surrounds. Number of Houses: 10

5 - 13 Central Road Description: Architect W Naseby Adams Pebble dashed elevations with two prominent bay windows. End houses have Dutch style hipped gables with tiles to upper walls. Date built: 1907 Roof in plain clay tile. Number of Houses: 5

66 - 72 Central Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Pebble dashed render to ground floor, supported on brickwork. First floor in wooden barge boarding. Roof in sandstone flagging. Date built: 1906 Number of Houses: 4

1 - 5 Church Drive Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork with some stone buttressing and bay windows between Numbers 3 and 4. First floor in render Date built: 1901 pebble dash, some quirky bays between oversailing clay tiled Number of Houses: 5 roof. Number 2 and 5 have oversailing porches supported on vertical timber columns.

14 - 16 Church Drive Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in brick work with recessed doors and porches. Roof in slate. Central area stepped forwards with barrelled led roof. Date built: 1900 Artwork details '1900' and 'L'. Number of Houses: 2

APPENDIX 2: Page 6 6 - 13 Church Drive Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Ground floor in sandstone, first floor in pebble dashed render. Arched stone lintels above doors. Clay tiles to top of gable ends Date built: 1905 and roof. Number of Houses: 8

18 - 26 Circular Drive Description: Architect Grayson & Ould pebble dash to lower walls with clay tile hanging upper walls & gables. Clay tiles to roof and dormer windows. Pebble dashed Date built: 1906 chimney stacks with brick profiled caps. Interesting Venetian style Number of Houses: 5 windows to some gables. Windows in timber.

2 - 16 Circular Drive Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork, pebble dashed render to first floor and gables. Diamond burnt headers and a cranked chimney Date built: 1899 add interest. Number of Houses: 8

28 - 38 Circular Drive Description: Architect William & Segar Owen See 1-7 Pool Bank. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 6

1 - 5 Corniche Road Description: Architect William Owen See 218-222 New Chester Road. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 3

17 - 23 Corniche Road Description: Architect E L Lutyens Elevations in fairfaced brick work with render to first floor central bay. Details to first floor and roofing clay tile with large brick Date built: 1899 chimney stacks. Complex forms of timber surrounds to windows Number of Houses: 4 and entrances.

25 - 29 Corniche Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor with bay windows and sandstone surround. Roof in clay tile with large chimney stacks. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 3

APPENDIX 2: Page 7 31 - 35 Corniche Road Description: Architect Jonathan Simpson Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with tiled roof extending over first floor. No. 31 had interesting rendered detail with artwork to Date built: 1897 central section. Leading detail to windows. Number of Houses: 3

37 - 41 Corniche Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Asymmetric design. Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor in painted render. Central bay and roof tiled. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 3

43 - 47 Corniche Road Description: Architect T.T Rees Brickwork on sandstone plinth for a ground floor. First floor in render with bay windows protruding into roof. Timber porches. Date built: 1898 Roof in clay tiles. Number of Houses: 3

49 - 53 Corniche Road Description: Architect Edmund Kirby Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. First floor windows with arched brick lintel. Central window is a dormer protruding through clay Date built: 1899 tiled roof and creating attractive porches area over No 51. Number of Houses: 3

55 - 59 Corniche Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Rendered elevations on a plinth of brickwork. Bay windows to ground floor with continuous roofs in clay tile to create porches. Date built: 1899 Dormer windows of the first floor protrude into clay tiled roof. Number of Houses: 3 Chimney stacks are in a stepping design.

61 - 67 Corniche Road Description: Architect Huon A Matear Elevations and chimney stacks in fairfaced brickwork. Roof and first floor level details in clay tiles. No. 61 has an attractive Date built: 1898 rounded entrance. Properties have an interesting Dutch Number of Houses: 4 influences.

69 Corniche Road Description: Architect William Owen See 61-69 Bolton Road. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 1

APPENDIX 2: Page 8 7 - 15 Corniche Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Ground floor in brickwork, first floor in render. Roof in clay tiles. Detailed sandstone lintel to doors. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 5

1 - 9 Cross Street Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 1 Bath Street. Date built: 1896 Number of Houses: 5

1 - 18 Duke of York Cottages Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with rendered panel to upper floor cantilevered first floor an gabled facades. Roof in sandstone Date built: 1934 flags. Many details adding interest to the property. Greendale Number of Houses: 18 road elevation has a central rendered section with stone dressing to doors, windows and end ranges in fair faced coursed ashlars stone.

11 - 17 Greendale Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Ground floor in highly ornate half timbered work and a Near perfect replica of Kenyon Peel Hall in Lancs. Collyweston stone Date built: 1902 flagging to roof. To the rear a stark contract to the glories of the Number of Houses: 7 Greendale Road elevation with plain brick with painted render above.

18 - 24 Greendale Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with Dutch style gables. Two properties have canted porches on timber brackets. Roofs in plain Date built: 1899 tile. Number of Houses: 7

25 - 29 Greendale Road Description: Architect Ernest, George & Yeates Central block of three houses with recessed end houses. Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork with timber cornice detail, render Date built: 1901 above. Clay tile roof. Number of Houses: 5

3 - 6 Greendale Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. 4-6 Greendale road with Queen Anne style porches. Porches to other properties are more simple. Date built: 1925 Roof in plain clay tile. Number of Houses: 4

APPENDIX 2: Page 9 30 - 32 Greendale Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with red sandstone dressing to doors and windows in mock Jacobean style. Stone ball caps to Date built: 1901 kneelers either side of three decorative gables. Decorative Number of Houses: 3 kneelers either side of gables. Roof in red clay tile.

33 - 39 Greendale Road Description: Architect Ernest, George & Yeates Elevations in render on a brick plinth. Recessed central bay with bay windows and decorative timber brackets to eaves. Roof in Date built: 1901 clay tile. Number of Houses: 7

40 - 43 Greendale Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brick to lower walls with rendered upper walls. Outer cottages have forward bays with classical framed gables. Central Date built: 1901 bays have swept overhangs in render. Brindle clay tiles to roof. Number of Houses: 4 Timber windows with leaded lights. Brick stacks with corbelled caps.

44 - 48 Greendale Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Fairfaced brickwork to all elevations with diaper patterning to gables. Sandstone surrounds to windows & door with carved Date built: 1901 detail. Roofs in red clay tile. Chimneys in fairfaced brick with Number of Houses: 5 buttress detail. Tall cylindrical pots to chimneys. Leaded lights.

49 - 53 Greendale Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Door dressing in carved decorative stone. Three double height bays to Greendale Road elevation. No. 49 has an interesting tiled Date built: 1901 hood. NO. 49 and 53 have half timbering. Number of Houses: 5

54 - 58 Greendale Road Description: Architect Pain & Blease Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with fine brick tracery. Diamond patterned brickwork and overburnt headers are a feature. Date built: 1901 Number of Houses: 5

59 - 63 Greendale Road Description: Architect Maurice B Adams Ground floor masonry, first floor in Harling with sandstone piers. Roof in clay tile with two end pavilions with gables and decorative Date built: 1899 tile hanging. Three central gables form the main elevation. Number of Houses: 5

APPENDIX 2: Page 10 64 - 70 Greendale Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot articulated entrance elevation. Full height brick gable on a stone plinth and dressings to windows. 65-69 have first floor in pebble Date built: 1902 dash render. Two end houses of prominent brick and stone gables Number of Houses: 7 with three Jacobean style decorative chimneys.

6a - 6h Greendale Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor cantilevered with half timbering & render. Timber surrounds to windows. Timber Date built: 1926 frame to both wings. Roofs in sandstone flags. Brick chimneys and Number of Houses: 8 various clay pots. Interesting flagged & cobble paving.

6k Greendale Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Timber framed cottages on a brick plinth with masonry chimney. First floor is slightly cantilevered. Tudor style arches to doors. Date built: 1901 Number of Houses: 1

71 - 74 Greendale Road Description: Architect William Owen See 79-82 Greendale Road. Date built: 1891 Number of Houses: 4

75 - 78 Greendale Road Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. With decorative tile hung gable sand attractive off-centre porch to No. 77. Clay tiled roof. Date built: 1891 Number of Houses: 4

79 - 82 Greendale Road Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in fairfaced brickwork, with stone porches. Central bay with decorative tile hanging. Clay tiled roof. Date built: 1891 Number of Houses: 4

83 - 87 Greendale Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brickwork and stone dressing to windows. Roof and gables in clay tiles cantered corner to Greendale road. Date built: 1891 Number of Houses: 5

APPENDIX 2: Page 11 89 - 92 Greendale Road Description: Architect William Owen Brickwork to ground floor with render and decorative detailing to first floor. Distinctive oval windows above entrance doors. Clay Date built: 1894 tile roof. Number of Houses: 4

93 - 96 Greendale Road Description: Architect Maxell & Tuke Ground floor in masonry with protruding bays. First floor in timber frame with decorative pargetting. Roof in rosemary clay Date built: 1896 tiles. Number of Houses:

97 - 100 Greendale Road Description: Architect Unknown - believed to be Gray Elevations in a combination of fairfaced brickwork and pebble dashed render. Diaper brickwork to gables. Oversailing roof in Date built: c 1894-5 clay tiles. Number of Houses: 4

1 - 15 Jubilee Crescent Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Brickwork and hung tile elevations with clay tiled roof. Timber framed lobbies with decorative herringbone brick. Date built: 1938 Number of Houses: 15

1 - 4 King George's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Ground floor and gables in brickwork. First floor in rendered pebble dash. Roof in slate with large chimney. Date built: 1913 Number of Houses: 4

21 - 22 King George's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Pebble dashed rendered elevations supported on fairfaced brickwork with a bay windows between No. 21 and 22. Roof in Date built: 1913 slate. Number of Houses: 2

5 - 20 King George's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in a combination of materials, including brickwork, timber framing, rendered pebbledash and barge boarding. With Date built: 1913 overhanging gable ends supported on timer brackets. Porches, Number of Houses: 16 sandstone surrounds and other details add interest. Roof in sandstone flags with detailed brick chimney stacks.

APPENDIX 2: Page 12 12 - 20 Lodge Lane Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Soft Cheshire red brickwork with heavy classical string course and dentil moulding to eaves. Highly decorative pedimented gables Date built: 1899 with oval framed window lights. Roofs in Westmorland green Number of Houses: 5 slate with mitred hips. Timber windows with clay/ terracotta sills. Brick chimneys with stone dressings. Cast iron rw goods including original soil pipe caps.

2 - 10 Lodge Lane Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Fairfaced brickwork to lower walls with red clay tile hanging to upper walls and roof. Main elevations have diaper brickwork with Date built: 1900 render panels. Arched brick lintols to lower windows with Number of Houses: 5 recessed timber units. Tile hanging to gables. Brick chimneys with simple corbelled detailing to caps. Combination of different pots and some missing. Rear elevations largely in brick with some pebble dashed render to gables and tile hanging.

1 - 7 Lower Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Rendered elevations above a brick plinth with dormer windows, flat roofed bays and double height bays. Vertical tile hanging to Date built: 1901 gable of No. 43 over a Queen Anne style bay. Notable off centre Number of Houses: 4 bay forming a porch between two terraces. Half height tile hanging to gables. Roof in clay tile and detailed chimney stacks.

15 - 27 Lower Road Description: Architect C H Reilly Ground floor in pebble dashed render. Roof over hangs first floor with protruding barrel vaulted dormer windows. Colonnade in Date built: 1906 timber. Number of Houses: 7

29 - 33 Lower Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Two half timbered cottages. Other properties have a fairfaced brickwork to ground floor with cantilevered first floor on timber Date built: 1907 brackets. Roof is in sandstone flags, with brickwork and diamond Number of Houses: 3 pattern chimneys.

35 - 49 Lower Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Ground floor in render supported on brickwork. The overhanging first floor has a tiled facia supported on timber brackets. Both Date built: 1906 ends have protruding gables. Roof in clay tile. Number of Houses: 8

51 - 59 Lower Road Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Pebble dashed render to ground floor, supported on brickwork. First floor in wooden barge boarding. Roof in sandstone flagging. Date built: 1906 Number of Houses: 5

APPENDIX 2: Page 13 9 - 13 Lower Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Elevations in render pebbledash on a brickwork plinth with three double height bay windows. Roof in clay tiles, canopied over the Date built: 1901 door. Number of Houses: 3

128 - 132 New Chester Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Fairfaced brickwork to elevations with draper detail to first floor, with additional diamond and rendering detail. Clay tiles with Date built: 1899 attractive brickwork chimneys. Number of Houses: 3

134 - 146 New Chester Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Ground floor in brickwork work draper detail. First floor in timber panelling supported on timber columns. Central bay in masonry Date built: 1900 and render. Roof in clay tiles with brick chimneys in diagonal Number of Houses: 7 orientation.

148 - 156 New Chester Road Description: Architect Huon A Matear Brickwork elevations and chimney stacks with brickwork detail and render to fist and second floor. Protruding bay windows to Date built: 1899 central bay. Timber canopy over front door. Roof in clay tiles. Number of Houses: 5

158 - 168 New Chester Road Description: Architect H Beswick Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork with first floor gables in render. First floor has a combination of windows and protruding Date built: 1899 bays, supported on elaborate timber brackets. Detailed stone Number of Houses: 5 carving create window surrounds and elevational insets. Double ended gable to side of property. Roof in clay tile with detailed chimneys in brickwork.

170 - 176 New Chester Road Description: Architect William Owen Fairfaced brick to the lower walls with a combination of brick and render decorative panels to upper walls. Unusual stepped gables Date built: 1900 with stone copings to side elevations. Brick & render chimneys. Number of Houses: 4 Timber windows with distinctive shallow bays and dentil mouldings to hood. Roofs in red clay tile. Rear elevations are a complete contrast with smooth plain brickwork and pointed gables.

178 - 190 New Chester Road Description: Architect Ernest, George & Yeates Whitewashed render to external walls with red tiles roofs including lower bays. Faintly classical detailing with dentil course Date built: 1897 to upper walls together with profiled eaves and ogee cast iron Number of Houses: 7 gutter. Timber windows with leaded lights. Brick chimneys with classical detailing & corbelled cap.

APPENDIX 2: Page 14 192 - 198 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Brick lower walls with rendered first floor with timber supports to jettied first floor bay. Stone lintols and terracotta cills to ground Date built: 1899 floor openings. Timber windows. Cast iron rw goods and clay tiled Number of Houses: 4 roof. Brick chimney with corbelled cap and faint classical dentil detail. Beautifully carved bargeboard to gable with decorative hopper.

200 - 210 New Chester Road Description: Architect Huon A Matear Fairfaced smooth red brick elevational treatment with decorative dutch style gables to flanking ends. Arched lintols to timber Date built: 1899 windows. Red tile roofs with very low eaves to frontage. Cast iron Number of Houses: 6 rw goods. Prominent first floor dormers with lead flat roofs.

212 - 216 New Chester Road Description: Architect William & Segar Owen See 2-10 Lodge Lane. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 3

218 - 222 New Chester Road Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. Brick diamond and render pattern to First floor with dormer windows protruding into the Date built: 1899 roof. Attractive surrounds in brick to doors and windows. Roof in Number of Houses: 3 clay tile.

224 - 228 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor. Render to first floor. Roof fin clay tile. Timber porches. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 3

230 - 232 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Brickwork to ground floor. Clay tiles to roof . Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 2

234 - 238 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Brick work to ground floor with timber dentil. First floor in render with dormer windows protruding into clay tiled roof. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 3

APPENDIX 2: Page 15 240 - 242 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork with bay windows. First floor in render with protruding dormer. Windows decorated in an Date built: 1899 Edwardian style. Roof in clay tile with elaborate brick chimney Number of Houses: 2 stacks.

244 - 248 New Chester Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor. Pebbledash render to first floor with bay windows. Door surrounds in elaborate sandstone. Date built: 1898 Roof in clay tile. Number of Houses: 3

250 - 254 New Chester Road Description: Architect William Owen Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor. First floor in render. Roof in clay tiles with brick chimney stacks. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 3

256 - 260 New Chester Road Description: Architect William Owen Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor. First floor in render. Details to upper section of end gables. Clay tiled roof with brick chimney Date built: 1898 stacks. Number of Houses: 3

262 - 266 New Chester Road Description: Architect William Owen Brickwork to ground floor. Painted render to first floor. Roof in clay tiles. Gable ends detailed with brick and clay tiles. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 3

268 - 274 New Chester Road Description: Architect Douglas & Minshull See 71-75 Bolton Road. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 4

276 - 282 New Chester Road Description: Architect William Owen Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor in render with brick detail under the windows. Roof is in clay tile and has Date built: 1896 decorative hoppers. Number of Houses: 4

APPENDIX 2: Page 16 284 - 286 New Chester Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor with protruding bays. Pebble dash render with artwork detail to first floor. Roof in clay tile. Date built: 1898 Number of Houses: 2

288 - 292 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Rendered elevations supported on stonework plinth. First floor cantilevered on half timbers. Clay tiles to gable ends and roofs Date built: 1899 with exaggerated timber fascia boards. No. 292 ground floor in Number of Houses: 3 brickwork and first floor in render with Jacobean influence. windows protruding through clay tiled roof.

294 - 296 New Chester Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Similar to 284-286 New Chester Road but with cedar shingles to first floor walls above brick lower walls with stone dressings to Date built: 1898 openings. Clay tile roofing with cast iron rwps. Brick chimneys Number of Houses: 2 with stone caps.

298 - 300 New Chester Road Description: Architect Jonathan Simpson Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor in timber frame and rendered panels. Roof in clay tiles. No. 300 has a recessed Date built: 1898 porch detail. Number of Houses: 2

302 - 304 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Ground floor in brickwork. Dutch style roof coming down over first floor in clay tiles. Large dormer windows to the first floor of Date built: 1899 the property. Number of Houses: 2

306 - 308 New Chester Road Description: Architect T.T Rees Elevations in brickwork with embossed brickwork to gable ends of property to gable ends of property. Roof in clay tiles. Porch of Date built: 1898 Number 308 in timber frame. Number of Houses: 2

310 - 312 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork with stone lintels and cills to windows. First floor in render with brick window surrounds. Roof Date built: 1899 in clay tiles. Number of Houses: 2

APPENDIX 2: Page 17 314 - 318 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. Rendered gables with rockwork pattern. Roof is in clay tiles. Front doors are recessed with timber Date built: 1899 porches. Rainwater goods are an interesting detail. Number of Houses: 3

320 - 322 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork and first floor in render with interesting brick work patterns. Roof in clay tiles. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 2

324 - 326 New Chester Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in render on a brickwork plinth. With intricate details in clay tiles to the first floor and gable ends. Roof is also in clay Date built: 1898 tile. Number of Houses: 2

1 - 7 Park Road Description: Architect William Owen Ground floor in brickwork with sandstone to door and window surrounds. First floor in a combinations of pebble dash render Date built: 1892 and timber panels supported on timber columns and beams. Roof Number of Houses: 4 in clay tiles. Decorative gables to properties numbered 3 and 5 and decorative asymmetric chimney design.

14 - 22 Park Road Description: Architect William Owen Fairfaced brickwork to elevations with decorative gables, plaster panels and half timber work. Fine carving to decorative barge Date built: 1894 boards. Number 14 has vertical tile hanging to gable. Roof in clay Number of Houses: 5 tile.

19 - 23 Park Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Brickwork ground floor with first floor in timber frame. Doors and windows with sandstone surround. Roof in clay tiles with Date built: 1894 decorative and large chimneys. No. 23, Slate rubble to elevations Number of Houses: 3 supported on brickwork. The large main entrance and windows have sandstone surrounds. Elaborate gable end. Roof in clay tile with decorative chimneys.

2 - 4 Park Road Description: Architect William Owen Half timbers above fairfaced brickwork with over sailing gables and jettied upper gables. Decorative pargetting and carving to Date built: 1894 barge boarding. Number of Houses: 2

APPENDIX 2: Page 18 24 Park Road Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Ground floor in coursed red sandstone and first floor in timber framing. Highly decorative gables with barge boarding. Roofing is Date built: 1894 in green Westmorland slate. Chimney have stone bases with Number of Houses: 1 decorative brick circular shafts.

26 Park Road Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Elevations in fairfaced brickwork and terracotta tracery with decorative stone dressing around doorways. First floor in half Date built: 1895 timber walling. Decorative carving and corner post particularly Number of Houses: 1 fine. Roofs in plain clay tile with decorative brickwork chimneys.

28 - 36 Park Road Description: Architect William Owen Dutch style gable elevations in brick panelling with terracotta and brick window dressing. Number 36 has ground floor in brickwork Date built: 1895 and first floor in half timbering. With bay windows and terracotta Number of Houses: 5 tracery. Decorative chimneys.

38 - 48 Park Road Description: Architect T M Lockwood Fairfaced brick to ground floor over sailing timber frame first floor. With intermediate bay windows and over sailing gables. Date built: 1895 Roof in diminished course green Westmorland slate with red clay Number of Houses: 6 banded ridge. Chimneys in decorative fairfaced brick with 'beaux- arts' motifs.

50 - 52 Park Road Description: Architect Grayson & Ould No. 52 in fairfaced brickwork with prominent chimney. No. 50 is half timbered on a plinth of brickwork. Witches hat roof and Date built: 1895 porch in cedar shingles rest of roof in a clay tile. Notable Number of Houses: 2 decorative carving to gable of No. 50

6 - 12 Park Road Description: Architect William Owen Jettied half timbered first floor and gable with end two houses in brickwork with gables and render panels. Roof in clay tiles. Date built: 1894 Number of Houses: 4

9 - 17 Park Road Description: Architect William Owen Ground floor in brickwork with bay windows to each property. The overhanging first floor is timber framed supported on Date built: 1894 decorative. Each property has a gable end supported on Number of Houses: 5 decorative brackets.

APPENDIX 2: Page 19 2 - 8 Poets Corner Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Fairfaced brickwork to base with rendered panels and brick dressing to first floor. Decorative dentil course with pediments to Date built: 1895 entrance doors. Brick gables with inclined brick tracery. First floor Number of Houses: 4 windows have brick tracery and segmented arches. Roof in clay tile with detailed chimney stack.

1 - 7 Pool Bank Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor in pebble dashed render. Clay roof tiles and protruding bays on alternate Date built: 1899 properties. Sandstone detailing to properties. Number of Houses: 4

16 - 22 Pool Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 18-26 Circular Drive. Date built: 1907 Number of Houses: 4

19 - 25 Pool Bank Description: Architect Huon A Matear Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork. First floor in pebble dashed render with turret like central bay. Roof on two levels covering Date built: 1899 porch and dormer window. Number of Houses: 5

2 - 6 Pool Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 18-26 Circular Drive. Date built: 1906 Number of Houses: 3

24 - 34 Pool Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevation in render supported on brickwork plinth. Gable ends and bay windows protrude into clay tiled roof. Arched brick Date built: 1907 surrounds to doors, benches in recess. Number of Houses: 6

27 - 39 Pool Bank Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Red sandstone plinth course and window dressings with a pebble dash render to upper walls. Distinctive curved bays in sandstone. Date built: 1901 Chimneys pebble dashed with stone cornice caps topped with red Number of Houses: 7 clay pots . Red clay tiles to roofs. Windows leaded lights set into stone mullions with metal framed opening lights.

APPENDIX 2: Page 20 41 - 53 Pool Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Dutch style brick gables and decorative brickwork generally together with half hipped gables to each side elevation. Brindle Date built: 1899 clay tile with tile hung panels to first floor dormer gables. Brick Number of Houses: 7 chimneys with corbelled caps. Timber windows with unusual semi- circular centre panel to casements. Cast iron rw goods. Rear elevations have more usual pitched gables.

55 - 67 Pool Bank Description: Architect Douglas & Minshull Brickwork to ground floor. Pebbledash to first floor. Clay tiled roof with stepping design brick chimneys. Bay windows to either Date built: 1899 end of the property. Twin doors with double porch. Buttressing Number of Houses: 7 detail centre of the property.

69 - 75 Pool Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 12-20 Lodge Lane. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 4

8 - 14 Pool Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in render supported on brickwork. Centre of bay decorated with tiles. Double door covered by timber porch Date built: 1907 Number of Houses: 4

9 - 17 Pool Bank Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Ground floor in fairfaced brickwork with sandstone window surrounds. First floor in pebble dashed render. Roof in clay tiles, Date built: 1902 with detailed brick and chimney stacks. Detailed rainwater goods. Number of Houses: 5

1 - 9 Primrose Hill Description: Architect C E Deacon and Horsburgh See 1-3 Central Road. Date built: 1907 Number of Houses: 5

11 - 21 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Bradshaw and Gass See 2-14 Central Road. Date built: 1906 Number of Houses: 6

APPENDIX 2: Page 21 16 - 28 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Huon A Matear Central dormer style range with two storey end bay and distinctive towers. Elevations in pebble dashed render on brick Date built: 1899 plinth with half timbered gables. Number of Houses: 7

2 - 4 Primrose Hill Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. Fairfaced with protruding bays. Roof in clay tiles. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 2

23 - 35 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Ormrod & Pomeroy Fairfaced brickwork to lower walls, sloping bases to ground floor bay windows. First floor has over sailing bays with prominent half Date built: 1906 timbered gables and heavy section barge boarding. Roofs of Number of Houses: 7 changing pitch. Upper walls in painted Harling render. Doors have distinctive Mackintosh rose style motive.

30 - 38 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Jonathan Simpson Asymmetric design in fairfaced brickwork with an ashlar stone plinth. With rendered gable with decorative motif. Clay tiled roof. Date built: 1899 Number of Houses: 5

37 - 45 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 1-7 Lower Road. Date built: 1901 Number of Houses: 5

40 - 50 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Edmund Kirby Cottage style in brickwork and render with prominent brick cill sand string courses. Low dormer style roof with prominent brick Date built: 1898 gables and heavy timber barge boards. Shallow brick arched Number of Houses: 6 windows to first floor gables. Roof in brindle clay tile with brick chimneys and corbelled caps.

47 - 53 Primrose Hill Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Fairfaced brickwork to the elevations with attractive tile hanging to the first floor. Shallow arches to the entrance doors and three Date built: 1925 windows. Roofs in plain clay tiles. Number of Houses: 4

APPENDIX 2: Page 22 52 - 56 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Maurice B Adams Fairfaced brickwork and stone to ground floor. Surmounted by tile hanging with two end gables and half timbered central bay. Date built: 1899 Clay tiled Dutch style roofs with decorative tile hanging to upper Number of Houses: 3 walls.

55 - 57 Primrose Hill Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson See 3-6 Greendale Road. Date built: 1925 Number of Houses: 2

6 - 14 Primrose Hill Description: Architect Douglas & Minshull Fairfaced brickwork to elevations with pebbledash panels to end bays. Three intermediated bay windows to ground floor. First Date built: 1899 floor windows absorbed within deep roof overhang. Full width Number of Houses: 5 porches.

10 - 14 Queen Mary's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Rendered properties with prominent gables to central section. Central black has brickwork to ground floor with a cantilevered Date built: 1925 first floor and further cantilevered bays. Roof in plain clay tile. Number of Houses: 5

15 - 22 Queen Mary's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Black and white half timbered cottages on a fairfaced brick work plinth. Decorative timber gables with cantilevered gables. Finely Date built: 1926 carved barge boarding to No. 16 and 22. Tudor arches to doors of Number of Houses: 8 No. 21 and 22. Double jettied gable to No. 22. Roof in sandstone flags.

23 - 30 Queen Mary's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in fairfaced brickwork, with two end bays in render. No. 24 has a curved cornice and Dutch style gables. Porch feature Date built: 1913 to No. 23 and 30 Number of Houses: 8

31 - 46 Queen Mary's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in a combination of fairfaced brickwork, pebble dashed render, timber framed panelling, barge boarding and render. Date built: 1913 Timber canopies over doors. Roof in sandstone flags with large Number of Houses: 16 chimneys.

APPENDIX 2: Page 23 47 - 50 Queen Mary's Drive Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Brickwork to gables and ground floors of central bay. Rendering to first floor with cantilevered half timbering. Clay tiles to gables Date built: 1913 and roof. Brick chimney stacks. Number of Houses: 4

1 - 8 Riverside Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in brick with pebble dash render detail. Centre bay stepped forward with heart shaped details to either side of bay Date built: 1895 windows. Dormer windows in tiled roof. Number of Houses: 8

9 - 10 Riverside Description: Architect J Joseph Talbot Elevations in fairfaced brickwork. Canopies over doors. Roof tiled and brick detailed chimney. Date built: 1897 Number of Houses: 2

1 - 4 The Causeway Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 49-53 Greendale. Pebble dashed render to elevations with varied stone and timber window surrounds. First floor windows Date built: 1901 protrude into clay tiled roof. Properties No. 2 and 3 have bay Number of Houses: 4 windows, No. 1 has an interestingly detailed chimney stack.

13 - 16 The Causeway Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson See 47-50 QMD. Ground floor and gable ends in fairfaced brickwork. Rendered First floor protrudes over ground floor and Date built: 1913 supported on timber lintel and column. Number of Houses: 4

17 The Causeway Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson See 8-12 The Causeway. Date built: 1913 Number of Houses: 1

18 - 22 The Causeway Description: Architect Wilson & Talbot Elevations in diamond patterned fairfaced brickwork. With stone dressings to doors and windows. Half timbered treatment to First Date built: 1901 floor. Roof in clay tile. Number of Houses: 5

APPENDIX 2: Page 24 5 - 7 The Causeway Description: Architect William & Segar Owen See 1-5 Church Drive. Date built: 1901 Number of Houses: 3

8 - 12 The Causeway Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with diamond pattern. Some decorative stone dressing. Varied details to all properties. No. 11 Date built: 1913 was rebuilt to original designs in 1959 due to subsidence. Number of Houses: 5

1 - 5 The Ginnel Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson See 7-23 The Ginnel. Ground floor in brickwork. Rendered first floor overhangs and is supported on timber beams and columns. Date built: 1914 Number of Houses: 3

25 - 35 The Ginnel Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Brickwork to ground floor. Pebble dashed render to first floor. Porches over front doors . Roof in clay tiles with brick chimney Date built: 1914 stacks. Number of Houses: 6

7 - 23 The Ginnel Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Brickwork to ground floor. Pebble dashed render to first floor clay tiles to roof and brick chimney stacks. Interesting motifs to gable Date built: 1914 ends and timber porches. Number of Houses: 9

1 - 7 Water Street Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Elevations in pebble dashed render on a brickwork plinth. Number 3 has a double bay windows and gable end, both clad in Date built: 1912 shutter boarding. Roof in clay tiles. Number of Houses: 4

2 - 4 Water Street Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Also 60-62 Bolton and 1-23 The Ginnel. Elevations in pebble dashed render supported on a brickwork plinth. Timber column Date built: 1914 support the oversailing first floor. The roof is in clay tile. Number of Houses: 2

APPENDIX 2: Page 25 9 - 21 Water Street Description: Architect William & Segar Owen Elevations in render on a fairfaced brickwork plinth. Porch over central section and roof in clay tiles with varied brick chimneys, Date built: 1912 recessed porches supported on timber beams and columns to Number of Houses: 7 end bays.

1 - 3 Windy Bank Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with classical square bay windows. Roof in plain clay tile. Date built: 1926 Number of Houses: 2

12 - 18 Windy Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Properties occupy sweeping corner and are juxtaposing at odd angles. Elevations in render with some parts in timber supported Date built: 1902 on a brick plinth. Roof are in plain clay tile with detailed chimney Number of Houses: 7 stacks.

19 - 22 Windy Bank Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson Elevation in pebbledash on a plinth of brickwork with bay windows to No. 19, 21 and 22. Slate roof and brick chimney Date built: 1913 stacks. Number of Houses: 4

2 - 4 Windy Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in pebble dashed render supported on brick work with bay windows. Lead canopies over doors. Roof in clay tile. Date built: 1902 Number of Houses: 2

23 - 24 Windy Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in brickwork of varying quality, orientation and colour. Gable ends have interesting brickwork pattern using brick on a Date built: 1907 45degree angle. Detailed string course and window surrounds. Number of Houses: 2 Roof is in slate. No. 23 has a cylindrical tower with cone shaped roof.

25 - 27 Windy Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould See 14-16 Church Drive. Date built: 1900 Number of Houses: 2

APPENDIX 2: Page 26 5 Windy Bank Description: Architect J Lomax-Simpson See 15-22 Queen Mary's Drive. Date built: 1926 Number of Houses: 1

6 - 11 Windy Bank Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in render supported on brickwork plinth with timber porches. Protruding bay between No. 10 and 11. Roof and top of Date built: 1902 gable in clay tiles. Number of Houses: 6

1 - 7 Wood Street Description: Architect William Owen Elevations in fairfaced brickwork with porches and three decorative gables. Roof and decorative vertical tile hanging to Date built: 1894 gables in plain clay tile. Number of Houses: 4

17 - 23 Wood Street Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Fairfaced brickwork to ground floor with over sailing first floor, supported by classical timber columns. First floor in render panel Date built: 1894 with brickwork dressing and four decorative bays, with pargetted Number of Houses: 4 panels. Roof in clay tile.

25 Wood Street Description: Architect J Joseph Talbot See 16-22 Bridge Street. Ground floor in coursed red sandstone and first floor in timber framing. Highly decorative gables with Date built: 1894 barge boarding. Roofing in green Westmorland slate. Chimney Number of Houses: 1 have stone bases with decorative brick circular shafts.

27 - 35 Wood Street Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Brickwork elevations on coursed rubble stone plinth. Central advancing gable flanked by porches. Brick stepped gable to Date built: 1895 central and end terraces with stone dressing, stone string course, Number of Houses: 5 brick dentil course, stone door and window dressing. Detailed chimneys.

37 - 47 Wood Street Description: Architect Grayson & Ould Elevations in brick and stone with stepped gables. Roofs in two pitches in clay tile with steeper mansard. Entrance doors have Date built: 1895 four centred arches without porches. Number of Houses: 6

APPENDIX 2: Page 27 49 - 55 Wood Street Description: Architect Douglas & Fordham Fairfaced brickwork to elevations . Entrance doors have brick jambs with four centred arches. Windows have decorative brick Date built: 1895 dressings and four first floor bay windows with flint infilled Number of Houses: 4 gables. Intermediate bays have decorative diamond flint infill panels.

9 - 15 Wood Street Description: Architect Unknown - believed to be Gray Central bay with square coursed rubble stone to ground floor and half timbered jettied first floor. Roof in clay tile with decorative Date built: 1892 brick chimneys. Number of Houses: 4

APPENDIX 2: Page 28 APPENDIX 3: SCHEDULE OF REAR WINDOW TYPES PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE LLBCO GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 1 Bath Street WOOD AWN 1 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No windows at Ground Floor. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Awning windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

11-13 Bath Street WOOD CT, DH 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6, 9 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 6 light casements. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 9 light casements NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

15-17 Bath Street WOOD CT, DH 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are six light casements. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

21-29 Bath Street WOOD CT, DH 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6, 9 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 6 light casement windows are in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 9 light casements. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED extensions. LEADED

3 Bath Street WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair WOOD AWN, FXD 1-over-1 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Awning window in modern masonry NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED opening. Not in Order.

31-33 Bath Street WOOD DH 6-over-2 Pair WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

5-9 Bath Street WOOD CT, DH 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 6 light casements. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

45-55 Bebington Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 1 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 57-65 Bebington Road WOOD WOOD NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No originals remain and archival evidence NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No originals remain and archival NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED does not support a specific window type LEADED evidence does not support a specific for this property. Not in Order. window type for this property. Not in Order. 67-79 Bebington Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

81-87 Bebington Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

89-97 Bebington Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light triples, 8 light singles NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

89-97 Bebington Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light triples, 8 light singles NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

99-109 Bebington Road METAL NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original windows remain and archival NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original window panes remain and NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED evidence could not be found to specify LEADED archival evidence could not be found to ground floor window types. Not in Order. specify ground floor window types. Not in Order. 1 Bolton Road WOOD CT, FXD, YS 8 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Site only partially accessible. Further NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Site only partially accessible. Further NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED information could result in additional types LEADED information could result in additional for Order. types for Order. 15 Bolton Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 32 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded light windows are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Order.

17-21 Bolton Road WOOD DH 4-over-1, 6-over-2 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FX 4, 6 Single, Tripl NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-over-1 is pair, 6-over-2 is single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Triple grouping is 6 LEADED LEADED lights. 4 light singles Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 2 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 17-21 Bolton Road WOOD DH 4-over-1, 6-over-2 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FX 4, 6 Single, Tripl NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-over-1 is pair, 6-over-2 is single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Triple grouping is 6 LEADED LEADED lights. 4 light singles

20 Bolton Road NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original drawings or comparable NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original drawings or comparable NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED houses/designs remain. Type could not be LEADED houses/designs remain. Type could not determined. be determined. 22-42 Bolton Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD AWN, CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: One pair of 4 light FXD/AWN windows. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Others 6 light casement pairs or quads.

5-7 Bolton Road WOOD DH, YS 4-over-4, 8 Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single YS has 2 sliding sash. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

5-7 Bolton Road WOOD DH, YS 4-over-4, 8 Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single YS has 2 sliding sash. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

60-62 Bolton Road WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6-light quad, 4-light single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

61-69 Bolton Road WOOD WOOD NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No originals remain. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Have an octagon as a central feature of NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED the leaded design.

64-78 Bolton Road WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

64-78 Bolton Road WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 3 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 71-75 Bolton Road WOOD DH 2-over-2, 3-over-3 Single WOOD CT, FXD 24 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

71-75 Bolton Road WOOD DH 2-over-2, 3-over-3 Single WOOD CT, FXD 24 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

9-13 Bolton Road WOOD CT 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT 4, 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

10-16 Boundary Road WOOD Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 15 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: As there are no original windows remaining NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED and no indisputable archival evidence to LEADED show ground floor window types, no replacement type could be specified for the Order. Not in Order. 13-31 Boundary Road WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 24 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-8 Boundary Road WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

3-11 Boundary Road METAL CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Single, Triple METAL CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

3-11 Boundary Road METAL CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Single, Triple METAL CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

33 Boundary Road WOOD CT, FXD 24 Pair NO WINDOWS NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No windows at first floor. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 4 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 35 Boundary Road NO WINDO WOOD CT 4 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No ground floor windows. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

37-43 Boundary Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

45-47 Boundary Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light windows are in groups of 3. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

16-22 Bridge Street WOOD CT, YS 8 Single WOOD CT 6 Five, Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8 light casement. Single (Pair of sash) NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED 8 light sliding Yorkshire sash. LEADED

1-9 Bridge Street WOOD CT, FXD, YS 10, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, DH 6, 6-over-6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8 light casement, single Yorkshire NOT IN ORDER NOTES: The 6-over-6 double-hung window (pair) NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED slider (each sliding sash has 8 lights), triple LEADED is only found at 1 Bridge Street. 10 light casement/fixed. 1-9 Bridge Street WOOD CT, FXD, YS 10, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, DH 6, 6-over-6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8 light casement, single Yorkshire NOT IN ORDER NOTES: The 6-over-6 double-hung window (pair) NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED slider (each sliding sash has 8 lights), triple LEADED is only found at 1 Bridge Street. 10 light casement/fixed. 8-14 Bridge Street METAL CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple METAL CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

3-4 Brook Street WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

5-10 Brook Street WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 5 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 1-3 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 8 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-light paired casement windows only at 1 NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Linked dormers have 8 light windows in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Central Road. LEADED triples. There is a combination assembly (stacked pairs of 8 light cmt/fxd windows) at 1 Central Road. 1-3 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 8 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-light paired casement windows only at 1 NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Linked dormers have 8 light windows in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Central Road. LEADED triples. There is a combination assembly (stacked pairs of 8 light cmt/fxd windows) at 1 Central Road. 15-27 Central Road WOOD Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Original windows could not be determined NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Original windows could not be NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED for the this block since there are no original LEADED determined for the this block since drawings, no original windows and no there are no original drawings, no comparable terraces by same architect. original windows and no comparable terraces by same architect. 16-34 Central Road WOOD CT 4, 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light casement windows are pairs. 4 light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED casements are single. LEADED

16-34 Central Road WOOD CT 4, 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light casement windows are pairs. 4 light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED casements are single. LEADED

2-14 Central Road WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Extensive alterations to convert into flats NOT IN ORDER NOTES: There is only one 2-over-2, found at the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED have altered original GF window openings. LEADED first floor of 2 Lancaster Close. Replacement windows at GF will require full listed building consent. 36-44 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: The end bays have 8 light casement NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED windows.

46-64 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 6 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 46-64 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

5-13 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Single, Triple WOOD DH 6-over-6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

66-72 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Six NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are single. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

66-72 Central Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Six NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are single. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

14-16 Church Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-5 Church Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light casement windows are in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED two storey pebbledash additions.

6-13 Church Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

18-26 Circular Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-16 Circular Drive WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 12, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 12 casement windows are pairs. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 7 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 28-38 Circular Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 3 Pool Bank has a pair of 4 light wood NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED casement windows.

1-5 Corniche Road WOOD NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original windows remain and no NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original windows remain and no NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED archival evidence has been found to date LEADED archival evidence has been found to to specify window type. Not in Order. date to specify window type. Not in Order. 17-23 Corniche Road WOOD CT 4 Pair, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4 Five, Six NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

25-29 Corniche Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

31-35 Corniche Road WOOD AWN, FXD Single WOOD NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Awning windows not in Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded ornamental windows are not in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED the Order.

37-41 Corniche Road WOOD WOOD NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original ground floor windows remain NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded ornamental windows are not in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED and no archival evidence found to specify LEADED the Order. ground floor window types. Not in Order. 43-47 Corniche Road WOOD CT, FXD 1, 4 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 1, 4 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Fixed 4 light sash over 1 light casement, in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Fixed 4 light sash over 1 light casement, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED pairs. Single windows have fixed 1 light LEADED in pairs. sash over 1 light casement. 43-47 Corniche Road WOOD CT, FXD 1, 4 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 1, 4 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Fixed 4 light sash over 1 light casement, in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Fixed 4 light sash over 1 light casement, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED pairs. Single windows have fixed 1 light LEADED in pairs. sash over 1 light casement. 49-53 Corniche Road WOOD DH 1-over-1 Single WOOD DH 1-over-1 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 8 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 55-59 Corniche Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

61-67 Corniche Road WOOD DH 1-over-1 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Original ground floor window openings NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED altered. Windows not appropriate for LEADED Order. 69 Corniche Road WOOD WOOD NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

7-15 Corniche Road WOOD CT, FXD 24 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 24 Quad, Six NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-9 Cross Street WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-18 Duke of York Cottage WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are small, single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are only in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED units. LEADED groups of 3. 6 light casement windows are in groups of 2, 3 and 4. 1-18 Duke of York Cottage WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are small, single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are only in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED units. LEADED groups of 3. 6 light casement windows are in groups of 2, 3 and 4. 11-17 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

18-24 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 9 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 25-29 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 10 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

30-32 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

33-39 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 10 Five NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single is shorter six light casement window. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

33-39 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 10 Five NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single is shorter six light casement window. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

3-6 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 6, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, DH, FXD 2-over-2, 8 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are in tall masonry NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 2-over-2 double-hung windows are NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED openings at 3 and 5 Greendale. 1-over-1 LEADED singles. 8 light casement windows are double-hung windows are at short, single pairs. masonry openings. 3-6 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 6, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, DH, FXD 2-over-2, 8 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are in tall masonry NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 2-over-2 double-hung windows are NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED openings at 3 and 5 Greendale. 1-over-1 LEADED singles. 8 light casement windows are double-hung windows are at short, single pairs. masonry openings. 3-6 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 6, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, DH, FXD 2-over-2, 8 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are in tall masonry NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 2-over-2 double-hung windows are NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED openings at 3 and 5 Greendale. 1-over-1 LEADED singles. 8 light casement windows are double-hung windows are at short, single pairs. masonry openings. 40-43 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 10 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 44-48 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

49-53 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

54-58 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

59-63 Greendale Road WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

59-63 Greendale Road WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

64-70 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light single awning not in the Order NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

6a-6h Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, DH, FXD 4-over-4, 6, 6-over-6, 8 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 1-over-1 double-hung NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are in quads. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED windows. LEADED 4-over-4 double-hung windows flank a 6- over-6 double-hung window. Casements are at 6C-6F. 6a-6h Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, DH, FXD 4-over-4, 6, 6-over-6, 8 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 1-over-1 double-hung NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are in quads. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED windows. LEADED 4-over-4 double-hung windows flank a 6- over-6 double-hung window. Casements are at 6C-6F. 6k-10 Greendale Road WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Groups of 4 are 8-light casement and NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED fixed windows.

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 11 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 71-74 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH 8, 8-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: the single 8 light is a casement NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

71-74 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH 8, 8-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: the single 8 light is a casement NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

75-78 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1, 8-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 3, 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: SMALL singles are 1 light FXD or CMT NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Nos. 77&78 have 3 light pairs NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

75-78 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1, 8-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 3, 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: SMALL singles are 1 light FXD or CMT NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Nos. 77&78 have 3 light pairs NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

79-82 Greendale Road WOOD DH 8-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 5 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Each casement sash has 4 lights NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED arranged over 1 light.

83-87 Greendale Road WOOD CT, FXD 15 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 15 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

89-92 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH 4, 6, 6-over-2 Single WOOD DH 6-over-6 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 6 light casement window is with the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED door. Single 4 light casement window is in LEADED single storey side extenstion on 92 Greendale. 89-92 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH 4, 6, 6-over-2 Single WOOD DH 6-over-6 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 6 light casement window is with the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED door. Single 4 light casement window is in LEADED single storey side extenstion on 92 Greendale.

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 12 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 89-92 Greendale Road WOOD CT, DH 4, 6, 6-over-2 Single WOOD DH 6-over-6 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 6 light casement window is with the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED door. Single 4 light casement window is in LEADED single storey side extenstion on 92 Greendale. 97-100 Greendale Road METAL CT, FXD 32 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 32 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Metal, leaded windows are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Metal, leaded windows are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Order. LEADED Order.

1-15 Jubilee Crescent METAL CT 6 Pair, Single, Triple METAL CT 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-4 King George's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Five, Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are in groups of NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement window are in groups NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED 3. LEADED of 4 in gables.

1-4 King George's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Five, Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are in groups of NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement window are in groups NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED 3. LEADED of 4 in gables.

21-22 King George's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

5-20 King George's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

12-20 Lodge Lane WOOD WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Ground floor windows heavily altered NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement is a single. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED when terrace modified to be flats. Ground LEADED floor windows not in Order. 2-10 Lodge Lane WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4, 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 13 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 15-27 Lower Road WOOD DH 6-over-6 Single, Triple WOOD DH 6-over-6 Five, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-7 Lower Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

29-33 Lower Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

35-49 Lower Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Quad, Single, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-light windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

35-49 Lower Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Quad, Single, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-light windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

51-59 Lower Road WOOD CT 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Quad, Six NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

9-13 Lower Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

128-132 New Chester Road WOOD Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 15 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: As there are no original windows remaining NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED and no indisputable archival evidence to LEADED show ground floor window types, no replacement type could be specified for the Order. Not in Order. 134-146 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 14 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 148-156 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD DH 4-over-1 Pair, Single WOOD DH 4-over-1 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are single units NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

148-156 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD DH 4-over-1 Pair, Single WOOD DH 4-over-1 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are single units NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

158-168 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

170-176 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

178-190 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 24 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in the Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

192-198 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

200-210 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD DH 4-over-1 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

200-210 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD DH 4-over-1 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

212-216 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 2, 4 Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 2 light window is a small single window. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 15 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 218-222 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: First floor windows are heavily altered NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED and no reliable precedent was found at other terrace blocks by same architect. Not in Order. 224-228 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Six NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

230-232 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

234-238 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

240-242 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

244-248 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

250-254 New Chester Road METAL AWN, CT, FXD 12, 4-over-6 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 12 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 4-over-6, AWN over NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED FXD. Awning window assemblies are not in LEADED the Order. 250-254 New Chester Road METAL AWN, CT, FXD 12, 4-over-6 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 12 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 4-over-6, AWN over NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED FXD. Awning window assemblies are not in LEADED the Order. 256-260 New Chester Road METAL AWN, CT, FXD 12, 4-over-6 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 12 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Singles are 4-over-6, AWN -over- FXD, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED leaded lights. LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 16 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 256-260 New Chester Road METAL AWN, CT, FXD 12, 4-over-6 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 12 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Singles are 4-over-6, AWN -over- FXD, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED leaded lights. LEADED

262-266 New Chester Road METAL AWN, CT, FXD 12, 4-over-6 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 12 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 4-over-6, leaded lights, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED AWN-over-FXD. LEADED

262-266 New Chester Road METAL AWN, CT, FXD 12, 4-over-6 Pair, Single METAL CT, FXD 12 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 4-over-6, leaded lights, NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED AWN-over-FXD. LEADED

268-274 New Chester Road WOOD DH 2-over-2, 3-over-3 Single WOOD CT, FXD 24 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded light windows are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Order.

268-274 New Chester Road WOOD DH 2-over-2, 3-over-3 Single WOOD CT, FXD 24 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded light windows are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Order.

276-282 New Chester Road WOOD DH 3-over-3 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 12, 30 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 12 light, leaded casement window is a NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED triple at 276 NCR.

284-286 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple WOOD CT 4 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

288-292 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Six, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement quad is in 288 NCR NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED gable.

288-292 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Six, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement quad is in 288 NCR NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED gable.

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 17 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 294-296 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple WOOD CT, FX 4 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 6 light casements. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

294-296 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple WOOD CT, FX 4 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single windows are 6 light casements. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

298-300 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 10, 4-over-1 Pair WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light fixed over 1 light casement windows NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED in pairs. Fixed 10 light window with door. LEADED

298-300 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 10, 4-over-1 Pair WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light fixed over 1 light casement windows NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED in pairs. Fixed 10 light window with door. LEADED

302-304 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

306-308 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 1-over-1 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 1-over-1 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Windows are fixed over casement. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Windows are fixed over casement. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Quads are at 306 NCR.

310-312 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

314-318 New Chester Road WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8 light casement is with the door. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

320-322 New Chester Road NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original windows remain at rear and no NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original windows remain at rear and NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED comparable windows remain elsewhere. LEADED no comparable windows remain Not in Order. elsewhere. Not in Order.

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 18 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 324-326 New Chester Road NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No access to site to assess extant NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No access to site to assess extant NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED conditions. Not in order. LEADED conditions. Not in order.

14-22 Park Road WOOD CT, YS 8 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-7 Park Road WOOD Pair, Single WOOD AWN, CT 1, 12, 25, 9 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original elevation drawings. Existing GF NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 1 and 7 Park Road have single, 25-light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED windows too inconsistent and/or altered LEADED wood casement windows and 12 light for a type in Order. paired casement windows; 3 and 5 Park Road have small, single light awning windows (NOT IN ORDER) under eaves, 9 light paired casement windows and 6 light paired casement windows. 19-23 Park Road WOOD CT, DH 4-over-2, 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-over-2 DH windows are pairs. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

19-23 Park Road WOOD CT, DH 4-over-2, 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4-over-2 DH windows are pairs. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

24 Park Road WOOD CT, YS 8 Single WOOD CT 6 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-4 Park Road WOOD DH 4-over-4, 6-over-6 Single WOOD CT, DH 6-over-6, 9 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Pair is 9 light casement windows at 2 NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Park Road.

2-4 Park Road WOOD DH 4-over-4, 6-over-6 Single WOOD CT, DH 6-over-6, 9 Pair, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Pair is 9 light casement windows at 2 NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED Park Road.

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 19 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 26 Park Road WOOD CT 6, 9 Single WOOD DH 6-over-6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 9 light casement window is grouped with NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED the door. LEADED

26 Park Road WOOD CT 6, 9 Single WOOD DH 6-over-6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 9 light casement window is grouped with NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED the door. LEADED

28-36 Park Road WOOD CT, DH 2-over-2, 4-over-2 Pair, Single WOOD CT 12, 9 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Pairs are 4-over-2 DH. 2-over-2 DH NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 9 light casements are in half-timbered NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED windows are singles. 6 light casements are LEADED end gable. single and pairs. 28-36 Park Road WOOD CT, DH 2-over-2, 4-over-2 Pair, Single WOOD CT 12, 9 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Pairs are 4-over-2 DH. 2-over-2 DH NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 9 light casements are in half-timbered NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED windows are singles. 6 light casements are LEADED end gable. single and pairs. 28-36 Park Road WOOD CT, DH 2-over-2, 4-over-2 Pair, Single WOOD CT 12, 9 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Pairs are 4-over-2 DH. 2-over-2 DH NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 9 light casements are in half-timbered NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED windows are singles. 6 light casements are LEADED end gable. single and pairs. 38-48 Park Road WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

50-52 Park Road WOOD WOOD CT, FXD 12, 18 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Limited access to site to assess extant NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded light windows are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED conditions. No original drawings and no LEADED Order. comparable designs by same architect/same design. GF windows not in Order. 6-12 Park Road WOOD CT, YS 8 Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 20 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 9-17 Park Road WOOD CT, YS 8 Single WOOD CT 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-8 Poets Corner WOOD WOOD CT, FXD 18, 24 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Limited access to site to assess extant NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED conditions. No original drawings and no LEADED comparable designs by same architect/same design. GF windows not in Order. 16-22 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-7 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 3 Pool Bank has a pair of 4 light wood NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED casement windows.

19-25 Pool Bank WOOD AWN, CT, FXD 1-over-1 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 1 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Awning window assemblies are not in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Order. LEADED

24-34 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-6 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

27-39 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement windows are in centre NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED three bays only.

41-53 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 21 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 55-67 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

69-75 Pool Bank WOOD WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Ground floor windows heavily altered NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casement window is a single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED when terrace modified to be flats. Ground LEADED floor windows not in Order. 8-14 Pool Bank WOOD CT 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

9-17 Pool Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

11-21 Primrose Hill WOOD DH 1-over-1, 2-over-2 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Extensive alterations to convert into flats NOT IN ORDER NOTES: There is only one 2-over-2, found at the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED have altered original GF window openings. LEADED first floor of 2 Lancaster Close. Replacement windows at GF will require full listed building consent. 16-28 Primrose Hill WOOD AWN, FXD 1-over-1 Pair, Single WOOD CT 1 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Awning windows not in Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-9 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Linked dormers: 8 light windows in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED triples.

23-35 Primrose Hill WOOD AWN 2-over-2 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Awning windows not in Order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-4 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light single casement window near NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED eaves.

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 22 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 30-38 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

37-45 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

40-50 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD DH 6-over-1 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

47-53 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 8 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 1-over-1 double-hung windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single window is a 1-over-1 double- NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED hung.

47-53 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, DH, FXD 1-over-1, 8 Pair, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 1-over-1 double-hung windows are singles. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single window is a 1-over-1 double- NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED hung.

52-56 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

55-57 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD DH 4-over-4, 6-over-6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Double-hung window triples with 4- NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED over-4 DH windows flanking a single 6- over-6 DH windows. 6-14 Primrose Hill WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

10-14 Queen Mary's Drive WOOD AWN, CT, FXD 1-over-1, 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single Awning windows (1-over-1) over NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Fixed are NOT IN ORDER. LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 23 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 10-14 Queen Mary's Drive WOOD AWN, CT, FXD 1-over-1, 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single Awning windows (1-over-1) over NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Fixed are NOT IN ORDER. LEADED

15-22 Queen Mary's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

23-30 Queen Mary's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4-over-6, 8 Five, Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are in fives, 4light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED fixed windows over 6 light casements in pairs. 31-46 Queen Mary's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 4 light casements are singles at 35 and NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED 42 QMD only.

47-50 Queen Mary's Drive WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light windows are found at two storey NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED gable ends. 4 light windows are singles.

1-8 Riverside WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple WOOD AWN 4 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

9-10 Riverside WOOD CT, DH, FXD 6, 6-over-2, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are pairs. 6 light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED casements are singles in the extension. LEADED

9-10 Riverside WOOD CT, DH, FXD 6, 6-over-2, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are pairs. 6 light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED casements are singles in the extension. LEADED

9-10 Riverside WOOD CT, DH, FXD 6, 6-over-2, 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casements are pairs. 6 light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED casements are singles in the extension. LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 24 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 13-17 The Causeway WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 4, 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are found at NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED 2 storey gable ends. 4 light casement windows are singles. 1-4 The Causeway WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

18-22 The Causeway WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Single, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

5-7 The Causeway WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light casement windows are in the NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED two storey pebbledash additions.

8-12 The Causeway WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Five, Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows in triples NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are found in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED groups of four in gables.

8-12 The Causeway WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Five, Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows in triples NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light casement windows are found in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED groups of four in gables.

1-5 The Ginnel WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

25-35 The Ginnel WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

7-23 The Ginnel WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 25 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 1-7 Water Street WOOD DH 2-over-2 Single WOOD DH 2-over-2 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-4 Water Street WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Five, Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

9-21 Water Street WOOD DH 2-over-2 Single WOOD DH 2-over-2 Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

12-18 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Single NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 6 light casement windows are in linked NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED dormers and small chimney windows.

1-3 Windy Bank WOOD CT 4 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Only short 4-light casement windows are in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Order. All other window openings have LEADED been altered. Not in Order. 19-22 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

23-24 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Triple WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

2-4 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair, Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

25-27 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Triple WOOD CT, FXD 8 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 26 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping Material Type Panes of Glass Grouping 5 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Quad NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

6-11 Windy Bank WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 6, 8 Pair, Quad, Triple NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

1-7 Wood Street WOOD CT, YS 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 12 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8 light casement window; paired 8 NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED light Yorkshire sliding sash LEADED

17-23 Wood Street WOOD CT, YS 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT 6, 8 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8 light casement, pair of 8 light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 8 light paired casement windows are in NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Yorkshire sliding sash (1 fixed/1 sliding) LEADED gables.

25 Wood Street WOOD CT, YS 8 Single WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED

27-35 Wood Street WOOD CT, YS 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT 8 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8-light casement, paired 8-light NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED Yorkshire sliding sash LEADED

37-47 Wood Street WOOD WOOD CT 15 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: No original ground floor windows remain NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Leaded windows are not in order. NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED and no archival evidence found to specify LEADED ground floor window types. Not in Order. 49-55 Wood Street WOOD CT, FXD 6 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 10, 6 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: 10 light casement window pairs are NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED LEADED found in gables.

9-15 Wood Street WOOD CT, YS 8 Pair, Single WOOD CT, FXD 8 Pair NOT IN ORDER NOTES: Single 8-light casement windows; paired 8 NOT IN ORDER NOTES: NOT IN ORDER NOTES: LEADED light Yorkshire sash. LEADED

Key to Terms and Codes Used in the Rear Window Schedule: Materials: Wood or Metal. Describes the frame material for the window. Metal windows are not covered in the LLBCO. Leaded: Indicates whether existing or appropriate windows have leaded lights. Windows with leaded lights are not covered in the LLBCO. Not In Order: Indicates whether windows are not covered by the LLBCO. Most windows excluded from the LLBCO are metal, leaded, or awning windows. Types: Indicates the operation (how it opens) of the window. CT: Casement or side-hung windows FXD: Fixed. Windows that do not open DH: Double-hung or vertical sliding sash windows YS: Yorkshire sliding sash or horizontal sliding sash windows AWN: Awning or top-hung sash. Not covered by the LLBCO Panes of Glass: Describes the number and configuration of individual glass panes in each sash. APPENDIX 3: Page 27 Grouping: Describes the number of windows in an assembly found at the property.

APPENDIX 7: PORT SUNLIGHT VILLAGE LOCAL LISTED BUILDING CONSENT ORDER PROCEDURE General Applicants will submit an LLBCO Notice Form (see LLBCO Notice Form) specifying the applicant’s contact details, agent and/or jointer/contractor’s contact details, the address of the listed building and a description of the nature and scope of the proposed work. The Notice Form also includes a check list for required supporting documents, including photographs and drawings.

Advice Wirral Council strongly recommends that applicants seek advice from either the Conservation Officer at the Council or the Port Sunlight Village Trust’s Conservation Adviser prior to making a Notice for works covered by the LLBCO. These heritage professionals can assist you in making an appropriate determination regarding eligibility for works covered under the LLBCO, especially with regard to meeting the ‘severely deteriorated’ threshold for replacing original features (rear windows, rear doors and yard gates).

For replacing rear windows, rear doors and yard gates: The LLBCO Notice Form shall be accompanied with an overall photograph of the exterior (rear) of the house and close up photographs from the exterior and interior of the features that are to be replaced.

In addition to the documentation requirements above, for replacing rear windows under the LLBCO, applicants must submit a scaled and dimensioned drawing of the proposed glazing bar profile (scale at 1:1), architrave profile (scale at 1:1) and horizontal and vertical section drawings (1:2) for the proposed windows. A joiner, window manufacturer, architect or surveyor can prepare these drawings for you. For relocating or installing satellite dishes: The LLBCO Notice Form shall be accompanied by an overall photograph of the exterior of the house, detail photographs of the proposed location and sight line photographs of the proposed location from the access roads and other viewpoints. The photographs shall have an 'X' marking the proposed location of the dish. The photographs shall be accompanied by supplier’s details for the dish or a simple drawing of the satellite dish showing colour, dimensions and installation details.

For all work covered by the Order, only the approved designs specified for your property may be used. See:  Appendix 2 for the schedule of addresses covered by the LLBCO;

 Appendix 3 for schedule of rear window types by address;

 Appendix 4 for schematic drawings and specifications for replacement rear windows. Schematic drawings are included to describe approved materials and construction. All details, features, profiles and dimensions of the specific windows to be installed must be drawn and submitted as part of your LLBCO Notice Form;

 Appendix 5 for drawings and specifications for replacement rear doors. Any one of the five door types may be used. No other rear doors or rear door types may be used under the Order;

 Appendix 6 for drawings and specifications for replacement yard gates. There is only one yard gate design specified in the LLBCO. No other yard gates may be used under the Order. Email or post the photographs, drawings (where required), product details (where required) and the completed LLBCO Notice Form to the Conservation Officer, Wirral Council. Wirral Council Regeneration & Environment Department Development Management North Annexe Brighton Street Wallasey WIRRAL CH44 8ED

The Council will send written confirmation that Notice form and supporting materials have been received.

You are advised to submit all required supporting documents and complete the checklist included on the LLBCO Notice Form to avoid delays in the determination of your proposal. All the necessary information should be submitted together (completed Notice form and supporting documents). Failure to do so may delay registering and confirmation of your Notice.

The Council will have twenty-eight (28) days after confirmation of receipt to review the Notice and make a determination regarding the appropriateness of the work proposed for your property. If the Council finds your proposal acceptable, then they will issue an Authorisation to Proceed letter.

 If the Council does not find your proposal acceptable, then: o you will receive a letter requesting additional information; o notification that your rear windows, rear door and/or yard gate does not qualify for the Order; or o notification that an application for full Listed Building Consent will be required to complete the works that are proposed.

[email protected] Regeneration, Housing and Planning Department Wallasey Town Hall, North Annexe Brighton Street, Wallasey, Wirral, CH44 8ED

Port Sunlight Village Local Listed Building Consent Order Notice Form

Wirral Borough Council has adopted the Port Sunlight Village Local Listed Building Consent Order (LLBCO) which permits certain works to be done to Listed houses within the Port Sunlight Village Conservation Area. The LLBCO and its Appendices set out the details and conditions for the permitted works. This Notice Form is to be completed by applicants and agreed by Wirral Council prior to undertaking works covered by the Order. The Notice is to be completed using BLOCK CAPITALS and returned to: [email protected] or the postal address listed above. Please ensure that the accompanying guidance notes have been read prior to completing this form to avoid delay in the processing of your notice to undertake works under the LLBCO. This form is also available to download on the Council website .

1. APPLICANT 2. CONTRACTOR/JOINER/AGENT

Title: First Name Title: First Name:

Surname: Surname:

House No. House No.

Address: Address:

Town: Postcode: Town: Postcode:

Email: Email:

Telephone: Telephone:

3. SITE DETAILS (Required if Applicant does not own and occupy the property where work is proposed.) House No. Address: Post Code: Telephone:

4. ADVICE (Has advice been sought from Wirral Council/Port Sunlight Village Trust prior to making this notice? ) Yes / No If yes, please give their name(s):

5. WORKS STARTED PRIOR TO NOTICE Has work described in this notice form already Yes / No Date work began (DD/MM/YYYY): started?

Is work described in this notice form already Yes / No Date work finished: (DD/MM/YYYY): complete? PROPOSED WORKS - (Tick all that apply and describe where indicated.) 6. SATELLITE DISH

A) Install a satellite dish B) Relocate a satellite dish

C) Diameter of proposed satellite dish: _____ cm D) Describe location of proposed satellite dish:

7. REPLACE A YARD GATE

A) Severely deteriorated B) Inappropriate (Describe):

8. REPLACE A REAR DOOR A) Severely deteriorated B) Inappropriate (Describe):

9. REPLACE REAR WINDOWS Ground Floor First Floor Second Floor Number of severely deteriorated windows to be replaced Number of inappropriate windows to be replaced

Describe proposed windows. Use codes from Rear Window Schedule, Appendix 3. (Include codes for: Material, Type, Panes of Glass and Grouping)

PHOTOGRAPHS CHECK LIST - (Tick to confirm included with Notice form.) 10. Attach colour photographs showing existing conditions (Yard gates, rear doors and rear windows.)

A) Overall view B) Detail view (exterior) C) Detail view (interior)

11. Attach colour photographs identifying proposed SATELLITE DISH location (marked with an “X”) A) Overall view of B) Detail view of proposed C) View of proposed location for proposed location location satellite dish, taken from access roads and other rights of way.

DRAWINGS CHECK LIST (REAR WINDOWS ONLY) - (Tick to confirm included with Notice form.) 12. Attach scaled and dimensioned drawings of proposed windows A) Sections of full window assembly B) Architrave & glazing C) Interior elevation of full (horizontal and vertical) bar profiles window assembly

DECLARATION 13. I/we hereby make an LLBCO Notice as described in this form and the accompanying photographs/ drawings. I/we confirm that, to the best of my/our knowledge, any facts stated are true and accurate and any opinions given are the genuine opinions of the person(s) giving them.

Signed (Applicant): Signed (Agent): Date (DD/MM/YYYY):

Data Date: 12/11/2015 Planning Applications Decided Under Delegated Powers Between 12/10/2015 and 12/11/2015

Application No.: OUT/15/00235 Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 30/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Mrs J Bather Agent: Shack Architecture Ltd Location: Little Orchard, HILL TOP LANE, GAYTON, CH60 2TT Proposal: Outline application for single detached dwelling

Application No.: 15/00298 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Dr Robert Williams Agent: Location: 3 High Mount, MOUNT AVENUE, HESWALL, CH60 4RH Proposal: New window to be built in lounge wall

Application No.: APP/15/00384 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bidston and St James Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 27/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs S Day Applicant: Agent: Paddock Johnson Partnership Location: LAND ON CORNER OF BEECHWOOD DRIVE AND FENDER WAY, BEECHWOOD, CH43 7SY Proposal: Erection of 11no. dwellings and associated infrastructure.

Application No.: APP/15/00540 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Moreton West and Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 21/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs S Day Applicant: Mr & Mrs D Hale Agent: Wirral Planning & Advice Appeals Location: Land Adjacent to 9 Acton Lane, SAUGHALL MASSIE, CH46 6EB Proposal: Erection of detached bungalow with detached garage and access drive and construction of flood compensation area

Application No.: APP/15/00638 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs S Day Applicant: Agent: Shack Architecture Ltd Location: LAND AT DEVONSHIRE ROAD, WEST KIRBY,WIRRAL Proposal: Construction of two detached houses with a stand alone garage and associated hard and soft landscaping.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 1 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/00692 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Mr Brian Norcott Agent: C W Jones Location: 74 DAWSTONE ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 8ND Proposal: Erection of a detached garage

Application No.: APP/15/00873 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Eastham Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr P Baty Agent: MDH Architects Ltd Location: 15 BERWICK AVENUE, EASTHAM, CH62 8EP Proposal: Demolition of existing side extension and erection of two storey side extension

Application No.: APP/15/00887 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr Kevin Curtis Agent: Mr Raymond Lear Location: 21, 23 & 25 GRANGE ROAD WEST, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 4BY Proposal: Erection of steel staircase and installation of raised access platform at rear of property together with insertion of six doors and six windows on rear elevation.

Application No.: LBC/15/00900 Application Type: Listed Building Consent Ward: and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J Malpas Applicant: Mr M Cotrell Agent: DnA Group Location: Farm, HILL BARK ROAD, FRANKBY, CH48 1NP Proposal: Amendments to LBC/13/0092; French doors to rear elevation instead of folding sliding doors, create 2 x stables, opening in the rear wall, new staircase to loft, dormer widow and conservation roof lights to former hay loft.

Application No.: APP/15/00903 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 02/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Agent: Designed Nation Location: 8E NORTH DRIVE, NEW BRIGHTON, CH45 0LZ Proposal: To install two new windows to existing gable wall

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 2 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/00926 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Seacombe Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 21/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Mr S Singh Agent: SDA Architecture & Surveying Location: 289-291 POULTON ROAD, POULTON, CH44 4BT Proposal: Expansion of existing convenience store into adjacent property - 291 Poulton Road (change of use) and associated works.

Application No.: LBC/15/00950 Application Type: Listed Building Consent Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J Malpas Applicant: Ms S Kennedy Agent: Paddock Johnson Partnership Location: 22 WINDY BANK, PORT SUNLIGHT, CH62 5ED Proposal: Proposed renovation; to include the partial removal of internal walls, reconfiguration of existing bathrooms and a new chimney cowl.

Application No.: APP/15/01018 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 21/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr M Malengo Applicant: Mr Steven Moore Agent: J Bargiel Architectural Consultants Location: 4 NIGEL ROAD, BARNSTON,WIRRAL,CH60 1XU Proposal: Two storey extension to rear of dwelling and erection of a mono-pitch roof over part of the existing single storey rear extension.

Application No.: DPP3/15/01027 Application Type: Work for Council by Council Ward: Pensby and Thingwall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Wirral Council Location: Pensby Primary School and Stanley School, GREENBANK DRIVE, PENSBY, CH61 5UE Proposal: Extension to form 2 new class rooms adjacent to existing Library

Application No.: APP/15/01034 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Rock Ferry Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 30/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Edward Welch Design Location: 507 OLD CHESTER ROAD, ROCK FERRY Proposal: Revised proposed two storey extension to provide 1 bedroom house

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 3 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01038 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 13/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Ms Rita Krumins Agent: Location: 244 WALLASEY VILLAGE, CH45 3LP Proposal: Variation of conditions 3 & 4 of approval APP/13/00949

Application No.: APP/15/01046 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 20/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mrs K Newton Agent: MDH Architects Ltd Location: 28 POPLAR ROAD, OXTON, CH43 5TB Proposal: Improvements to guttering to existing side extension, new lime render to replace existing pebble-dash render

Application No.: APP/15/01048 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr S Lacey Applicant: Mr Lea Agent: LHGProjects Location: Bradshaw Farnham and Lea, 18 THE CRESCENT, WEST KIRBY, CH48 4HN Proposal: Application of white render above replacement sign.

Application No.: ADV/15/01049 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 19/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr S Lacey Applicant: Mr P Lea Agent: LHGProjects Location: Bradshaw Farnham and Lea, 18 THE CRESCENT, WEST KIRBY, CH48 4HN Proposal: Replacement sign above glazing

Application No.: APP/15/01057 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Upton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 21/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Thorpe Agent: SDA Architecture & Surveying Location: 5 KIRKWAY, UPTON, CH49 6NH Proposal: Single Storey Rear Extension & Double Storey Side Extension

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 4 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01061 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Moreton West and Decision Level: Delegated Saughall Massie Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr Andrew French-Wollen Agent: Location: 2 SYCAMORE CLOSE, UPTON, CH49 4QL Proposal: Single storey rear and side extension; erection of a 2m high fence.

Application No.: APP/15/01076 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs C Parker Applicant: Agent: Plan A (North West) Limited Location: Land at OXTON ROAD/BALLS ROAD EAST, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 2TN Proposal: Demolition of existing buildings and erection of retail store with car parking and servicing areas and site access and associated works.

Application No.: APP/15/01090 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 20/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Mr Lee Roberts Agent: AHR Architects Location: St Peters CE Primary School, THURSTASTON ROAD, HESWALL, CH60 4SA Proposal: New extension to create a new staff withdrawal room and new offices to an existing school

Application No.: ADV/15/01102 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Leasowe and Moreton Decision Level: Delegated East Decision Date: 05/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Agent: Ainsley Gommon Architects Location: Melrose, STAVORDALE ROAD, MORETON Proposal: Site signboard for proposed development, with client, design team and HCA logos, as well as a description of the scheme.

Application No.: APP/15/01104 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mrs Elizabeth Gould Agent: Architects-Direct.com Location: 7 GAYTON ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 8PF Proposal: Remove roof of garage increase height by 1.65 metres and erect 2-storey extension to rear. Construct new roof and loft room over. Resubmission of approved application APP/15/00592

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 5 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01108 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 30/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr David Wainwright Agent: Location: 52 MEADOW ROAD, NEWTON, CH48 9XL Proposal: Single storey front, side and rear extension

Application No.: APP/15/01118 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr & Mrs Bennett Agent: KJP Architecture Location: 20 ROAD, BARNSTON, CH60 1XG Proposal: Single storey side Extension

Application No.: APP/15/01130 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 30/10/2015 Decision: Withdrawn Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr Martin Poreba Agent: Location: 23 SANDY LANE, WEST KIRBY, CH48 3HY Proposal: Rear extension and loft conversion.

Application No.: APP/15/01132 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Mr Rocco Hadland Agent: C W Jones Location: 9 Fernlea Road, Heswall, Wirral, CH60 5SH Proposal: Rear/side single storey extension.

Application No.: APP/15/01134 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 03/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Ms J Storey Applicant: Agent: Fineline Architectural Design Location: Cereal Partners U K Bromborough, PORT CAUSEWAY, BROMBOROUGH, CH62 4SY Proposal: The Proposal is for the erection of 5no. porta cabins forming changing facilities

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 6 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01136 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bebington Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 19/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mrs K Connolly Agent: Neville Pickard Location: 37 Oaklands Drive, Bebington, Wirral, CH63 7NB Proposal: Single storey rear extension

Application No.: APP/15/01137 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 22/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Dr Oakes Agent: RADM Architects Location: Lower Wellwood, 7 SCHOOL HILL, HESWALL, CH60 0DP Proposal: Two storey side extension with patio. Demolition of Current conservatory, garage, store and hall/boot room. (Amended description)

Application No.: APP/15/01139 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Hitchcock Wright and Partners Location: 81 CANNING STREET, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 1AF Proposal: Change of Use from educational facility for the teaching of bricklaying, plastering and associated trades (D1) to industrial/warehousing (B2/B8).

Application No.: ADV/15/01141 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: ProLicht UK Limited Location: Windsors Mazda, HARRISON DRIVE, WALLASEY VILLAGE, CH45 3HL Proposal: Remove existing signage and install new Mazda signage

Application No.: APP/15/01142 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Seacombe Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 14/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Mr Simon Agent: Philip Barton MCD BA(Hons) MRTPI Location: 3 Uveco Business Centre, DOCK ROAD, POULTON, CH41 1DX Proposal: Change of use from industrial (Use Class B2) to leisure (Use Class D2)

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 7 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01144 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Ms Owen Agent: KJP Architecture Location: 54 POLL HILL ROAD, HESWALL, CH60 7SW Proposal: Two Storey Side and Single Storey Rear Extensions

Application No.: APP/15/01147 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Simon Ellis-Jones Agent: Location: 3A PARK ROAD, WEST KIRBY, CH48 4DN Proposal: External stair access from first floor.

Application No.: APP/15/01148 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Agent: Deloitte LLP Location: Unit M3, The Croft Retail and Leisure Park, WELTON ROAD, BROMBOROUGH, CH62 3PN Proposal: A 14.2 sq.m. extension of hardstanding to existing paved area and change of Use (A1/A3) of hardstanding to provide space for additional 39.2 sq.m external seating area at Costa Coffee (Unit M3)

Application No.: APP/15/01149 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mrs Heather Cross Agent: C C Gladding Architects Location: 18 FRANKBY ROAD, NEWTON, CH48 6EE Proposal: SINGLE STOREY FRONT AND REAR EXTENSIONS AND INTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO FORM GRANNY FLAT

Application No.: LBC/15/01150 Application Type: Listed Building Consent Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J Malpas Applicant: Miss Amanda Gillard Agent: Location: 23 THE GINNEL, PORT SUNLIGHT, CH62 5HD Proposal: Move the internal doorway between the living room and kitchen towards the corner of the room by 60cm. This will require the current doorway to be boarded up and a new one opened up. The existing door and door surround will be retained.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 8 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01152 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Moreton West and Decision Level: Delegated Saughall Massie Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mrs Karla Wilson Agent: chdesign Location: 16 FELTON CLOSE, MORETON, CH46 6HH Proposal: Demolition of garage - Proposed Single storey rear/side extension.

Application No.: APP/15/01153 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Paddock Johnson Partnership Location: 25-27 MATHER ROAD, OXTON Proposal: Erection of an external staircase to the existing property on 25-27 Mather Road, .

Application No.: APP/15/01154 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr Alan McMahon Agent: C W Jones Location: 38 LEIGHTON AVENUE, MEOLS, CH47 0LZ Proposal: First floor side and ground floor front extension, (amendment to application ref : 15/00496 to increase width of extension and alter front bay window)

Application No.: APP/15/01155 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Ian Kennerley Agent: Location: 22 BRACKENSIDE, HESWALL, CH60 7RX Proposal: Proposed single storey kitchen extension incorporating utility room, with pitched roof, at rear of existing bungalow.

Application No.: APP/15/01156 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr Jones Agent: Jones Location: 18 KINGLASS ROAD, BROMBOROUGH, CH63 9AJ Proposal: Demolition of existing detached garage followed by the construction of a single storey side extension/garage.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 9 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01157 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs S Day Applicant: Agent: Craig Foster Architects Location: 73 GROVE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE, CH45 3HF Proposal: Change of Use from single residential house to part of GP Surgery. Existing surgery is next door at 71 Grove Road.

Application No.: APP/15/01158 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 20/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr Paul Allen Agent: Kriss Cringle Associates Location: 65 QUEENS AVENUE, MEOLS, CH47 0LS Proposal: The erection of a single storey extension at the rear of the property and the demolition of a chimney stack.

Application No.: APP/15/01159 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mrs P Wild Agent: KJP Architecture Location: 5 HALL DRIVE, GREASBY, CH49 1RN Proposal: Two storey side extension and internal alterations

Application No.: APP/15/01160 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Ben Basterfield Agent: Paddock Johnson Partnership Location: 35 VILLAGE ROAD, OXTON, CH43 6TZ Proposal: Erection of a 2 storey side extension to existing semi detached 4 bedroomed house.

Application No.: ADV/15/01161 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Refuse Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr Neil Collins Agent: Location: DAISY & JAKE DAY NURSERY, 4 HOLM LANE, OXTON, CH43 2HP Proposal: Temporary banner erected on side gable.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 10 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01165 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Ms J Storey Applicant: Agent: Paddock Johnson Partnership Location: Age Concern, 42-46 MARKET STREET, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 5BT Proposal: Widening of existing rear door to allow electric wheelchair access for visitors and staff . Associated alterations to the existing palisade railings, to allow for new gate and DDA compliant ramp for access.

Application No.: APP/15/01168 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mrs Phoebe Davies Agent: Location: 32 POLL HILL ROAD, HESWALL, CH60 7SN Proposal: Proposed two storey side extension (partially above existing single storey side) & rear single storey extension.

Application No.: ADV/15/01169 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Rock Ferry Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 20/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Location: 1 VALIANT WAY, TRANMERE, CH41 9HS Proposal: A variety of large scale illuminated signs on a retail unit we have taken over.

Application No.: APP/15/01173 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Pensby and Thingwall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 21/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Ms J Storey Applicant: Mr Ged Clark Agent: RADM Architects Location: 6 OAKLEA ROAD, IRBY, CH61 3US Proposal: Erection of new two storey dwelling

Application No.: APP/15/01177 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Eastham Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mrs Lesley Roach Agent: Location: 2 NEVILLE ROAD, BROMBOROUGH, CH62 7JE Proposal: 1st Floor extension over existing garage to side of house.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 11 of 25 Application No.: ADV/15/01178 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Seacombe Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: CHARTWELL PM Location: 18 CHURCH ROAD, SEACOMBE, CH44 6JF Proposal: Box fascia sign.

Application No.: APP/15/01179 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 19/10/2015 Decision: Withdrawn Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr John Hyde Agent: C C Gladding Architects Location: 12 ENNERDALE ROAD, NEW BRIGHTON, CH45 0LY Proposal: Formation of additional 2 bedroom flat in loft area

Application No.: APP/15/01180 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 15/10/2015 Decision: Refuse Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Gilmore Developments Limited Location: M J Lavin Plant and Machinery, 7-11 NEW HALL LANE, HOYLAKE, CH47 4BP Proposal: Change of use from warehouse to gymnasium- Amended address

Application No.: APP/15/01183 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 20/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Agent: i-lid design ltd Location: FRANKIE AND BENNYS WIRRAL LEISURE PARK, WELTON ROAD, BROMBOROUGH, CH62 3PN Proposal: Changes to the external finishes

Application No.: APP/15/01184 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 22/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Dr Surendra Shah Agent: Kriss Cringle Associates Location: 1 HAZELWOOD, GREASBY, CH49 2RQ Proposal: Front, single storey, porch extension

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 12 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01187 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Adams Agent: Bryson McHugh Architects Location: 13 CLAREMONT ROAD, WEST KIRBY, CH48 5EA Proposal: Erection of single storey rear extension

Application No.: APP/15/01188 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 19/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr & Mrs Connell Agent: Naldo CAD Location: 38 CIRCULAR DRIVE, GREASBY, CH49 3NB Proposal: Single storey extension to the rear and side

Application No.: APP/15/01190 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 20/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr William Lancaster Agent: Matischok and Ross Architectural Services Location: Brackenwood, COLUMN ROAD, NEWTON, CH48 1LH Proposal: Proposed erection of a two storey detached house and detached garage

Application No.: ADV/15/01193 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Omega Signs Limited Location: Red Cat, GREASBY ROAD, GREASBY, CH49 3AT Proposal: Reposition already approved post sign

Application No.: APP/15/01194 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr Stephen Lewis Agent: Location: First Floor 2A MACDONALD DRIVE, GREASBY, CH49 1RJ Proposal: Change of use to beauty salon.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 13 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01198 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Milligan Agent: KJP Architecture Location: 85 MILL HILL ROAD, IRBY, CH61 4XA Proposal: Single Storey Side & Rear Extension, Loft Conversion and Internal Alterations

Application No.: LBC/15/01199 Application Type: Listed Building Consent Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr Barry Bragg Agent: Location: 70 WHETSTONE LANE, TRANMERE, CH41 2TG Proposal: The removal of a section of the dividing wall between the two rooms to be supported by a steel beam and the removal of part of a chimney breast.

Application No.: APP/15/01201 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mrs Devall Agent: Jakesville Studios Location: Rose Cottage, 11 HILLSIDE ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 0BJ Proposal: 2 storey side extension to accommodate a bedroom and bathroom at first floor and dining/Utility space at ground floor

Application No.: APP/15/01205 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 02/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Stride Treglown Location: 18-20 GRANGE ROAD WEST, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 4DA Proposal: Facade Works to Shopfront

Application No.: APP/15/01206 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bidston and St James Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 04/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Smith + McHugh Architects LTD Location: Hillgrove Residential Home, 79 ELEANOR ROAD, BIDSTON, CH43 7QW Proposal: Erection of 3 No. new dwelling houses on land to the rear of 79 Eleanor Road.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 14 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01209 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 22/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Chambers Agent: Garry Usherwood Associates Limited Location: 26 ASBURY ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE, CH45 8NJ Proposal: Rear single storey extension and first floor extension above replacement garage.

Application No.: APP/15/01211 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Claughton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr Rob Dabner Agent: SDA Architecture & Surveying Location: 85 GROSVENOR ROAD, CLAUGHTON, CH43 1UD Proposal: Remodel existing single storey side extension (new roof and and fan light) and remodel existing dormer (new balcony and french doors)

Application No.: APP/15/01213 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Bebington Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 22/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr & Mrs K Ritchie Agent: PATERSON MACAULAY & OWENS Location: 21 LINKSIDE, HIGHER BEBINGTON, CH63 5PE Proposal: Proposed rear extension and decking

Application No.: ADV/15/01215 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 05/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Sixtwo Architects Location: KNOX STREET, BIRKENHEAD, CH41 5JU Proposal: Building signage and tenants sign board

Application No.: APP/15/01217 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 30/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr & Dr Nelson Agent: Architects-Direct.com Location: Oakwood, 3 GAYTON ROAD, GAYTON, CH60 8PF Proposal: Proposed 2 storey side/rear extension, loft conversion and garage roof alteration.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 15 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01218 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr & Mrs Goulding Agent: Architects-Direct.com Location: 30 BOUNDARY LANE, GAYTON, CH60 5RR Proposal: Two storey side extension & general internal & external alterations

Application No.: APP/15/01219 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Pensby and Thingwall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 02/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Ms Carole Longworth Agent: Whiteside Building Design Location: Montford, 10 KYLEMORE DRIVE, PENSBY, CH61 6UQ Proposal: Proposed double storey extension to the side elevation and single storey extension to the rear elevation.

Application No.: APP/15/01220 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Claughton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 30/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr R Turnbull Agent: Neville Pickard Location: 11 GRASMERE AVENUE, , CH43 9SG Proposal: Single storey front, side and rear extension

Application No.: APP/15/01221 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Sutton Agent: s n amery architectural services Location: 68 BROADWAY AVENUE, LISCARD, CH45 6TD Proposal: Single storey rear extension.

Application No.: OUT/15/01222 Application Type: Outline Planning Permission Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Ian Lane Agent: MDH Architects Ltd Location: Ronald Dene, 16 CROFT LANE, BROMBOROUGH, CH62 2DD Proposal: Outline application for one new property to land at rear of 16 Croft Lane Bromborough (Resubmission)

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 16 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01223 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mrs B Gauntlett Agent: Bromilow Architects Ltd Location: 10 SHAWS DRIVE, MEOLS, CH47 5AP Proposal: Renewal of application no: 2012/01185 Proposed loft conversion, front dormer, garage conversion including front bay window.

Application No.: DPP3/15/01224 Application Type: Work for Council by Council Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Wirral Council Location: Elleray Park School, ELLERAY PARK ROAD, LISCARD, CH45 0LH Proposal: Extra classroom, rear of school

Application No.: APP/15/01225 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Mr & Mrs Sweeney Agent: NextPhase Development Location: Springbank, FRANKBY STILES, FRANKBY, CH48 1PL Proposal: Variation of Condition of Approval APP/15/00028 (Erection of eco dwelling) so that the development shall be in accordance with the plans 0204-01/02B, 0204-01/03C, 0204-01-05 (amended design)

Application No.: RESX/15/01226 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Pensby and Thingwall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 13/10/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Daniel Jones Agent: Mr Dean Johnstone Location: 47 BARNSDALE AVENUE, THINGWALL, CH61 1BD Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 4m for which the maximum height would be 3.75m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.45m

Application No.: APP/15/01228 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Matt Goodwin Agent: LHGProjects Location: 17 BURLINGHAM AVENUE, NEWTON, CH48 8AJ Proposal: Two storey rear extension and first floor front extension. Replacement roof with 1m increase in ridge height. Rear dormer

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 17 of 25 Application No.: RESX/15/01232 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 19/10/2015 Decision: Prior Approval Given Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Ms Chloe Langton Agent: The Kenefick Jones Partnership Location: 17 GRANGE MOUNT, NEWTON, CH48 6ET Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 3.523m for which the maximum height would be 3.988m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.990m

Application No.: APP/15/01233 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr & Mrs Orr Agent: Architects-Direct.com Location: Pine Wood, 5 BARNSTON ROAD, BARNSTON, CH60 2SN Proposal: Single storey extension to rear. New Boundary party wall. Garden structure

Application No.: APP/15/01234 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr Dave Williams Agent: RADM Architects Location: 6 MILTON CRESCENT, HESWALL, CH60 5ST Proposal: Sing storey rear extension and two storey side extension.

Application No.: APP/15/01237 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Upton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 04/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr Flan Mulqueen Agent: C W Jones Location: 9 SOUTH DRIVE, UPTON, CH49 6LA Proposal: Provision of three rooflights to front elevation.

Application No.: APP/15/01238 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr Kelvin Wright Agent: C W Jones Location: 7 FOXFIELD ROAD, MEOLS, CH47 0NJ Proposal: Rear/side single storey extension

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 18 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01239 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Greasby Frankby and Decision Level: Delegated Irby Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mrs Joyce Brigden Agent: Kriss Cringle Associates Location: 45 LLOYD DRIVE, GREASBY, CH49 1RQ Proposal: Erection of a single storey Orangery extension at the rear of the property.

Application No.: DEM/15/01240 Application Type: Prior Notification of Demolition Ward: Claughton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 19/10/2015 Decision: Prior approval is required Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Agent: Redfearn Morrison Thomas Location: St Anselms College, MANOR HILL, CLAUGHTON, CH43 1UQ Proposal: Demolition of two storey prefabricated timber structure with flat roof, previously used for 6th Form accommodation. Currently derelict, make good in section and size to match existing playground area

Application No.: APP/15/01243 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Eastham Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr Sumner Agent: d2 architects Location: 44 MORLAND AVENUE, BROMBOROUGH, CH62 6BE Proposal: Proposed single storey rear extension.

Application No.: APP/15/01245 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr John Hamm Agent: Bryson McHugh Architects Location: 162 ROAD, OXTON, CH42 9LS Proposal: Erection of two storey side extension

Application No.: RESX/15/01246 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Eastham Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 13/10/2015 Decision: Permission Required Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mrs S Harrison Agent: Linwood North West Ltd Location: 16 GLENBURN AVENUE, EASTHAM, CH62 8DJ Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 6.9m for which the maximum height would be 3.1m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.25m

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 19 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01247 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mrs Helen Gau Agent: Bryson McHugh Architects Location: 3 BOLLINGTON CLOSE, OXTON, CH43 2GT Proposal: Eection of two storey side extension

Application No.: LDP/15/01248 Application Type: Lawful Development Certificate Proposed Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Lawful Use Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Location: 164 BANKS ROAD, WEST KIRBY, CH48 0RH Proposal: Lawful Development Certificate Proposed use

Application No.: LDP/15/01249 Application Type: Lawful Development Certificate Proposed Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Lawful Use Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Agent: Location: 166 BANKS ROAD, WEST KIRBY, CH48 0RH Proposal: Lawful Development Certificate for Proposed use

Application No.: ADV/15/01250 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Eastham Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 05/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: Sign Specialists Ltd Location: Eastham Motors Car Sales, 1247 NEW CHESTER ROAD, EASTHAM, CH62 0AA Proposal: 3 X INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ROLLED ALUMINIUM FASCIA'S 2 X NON ILLUMINATED WALL MOUNTED SIGNS 1 x NON ILLUMINATED SINGLE SIDED WELCOME SIGN

Application No.: APP/15/01251 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Wallasey Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr N Burn Agent: m f architecture ltd Location: Grove House , 45 GROVE ROAD, WALLASEY VILLAGE, CH45 3HF Proposal: Demolition of an existing conservatory and erection of an orangery with access ramp.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 20 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01257 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Upton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 05/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr George Maher Agent: Location: 9 BRIGHTWELL CLOSE, UPTON, CH49 6PR Proposal: Erection of 2-storey side and single storey rear extensions.

Application No.: APP/15/01258 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr J Mullin Agent: JT DESIGN CONSULTANCY Location: 6 SANDSTONE DRIVE, NEWTON, CH48 9UW Proposal: Two storey rear extension

Application No.: SPVX/15/01260 Application Type: PriorApproval Solar PV roof non-domestic Ward: Bromborough Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Agent: Mr Paul Erskine Location: Capital House, 1 Bromborough Pool Business Park, Prices Way, Bromborough, Merseyside, CH62 4LP Proposal: Notification for prior approval for the installation, alteration or replacement of other Solar photovotaics (PV) equipment on the roofs of non-domestic buildings, up to a capacity of 1 megawatt, subject to certain limitations

Application No.: APP/15/01262 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Claughton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Mr & Mrs Hennessey Agent: Garry Usherwood Associates Limited Location: The Chase, NOCTORUM ROAD, NOCTORUM, CH43 9UQ Proposal: Demolish part single storey rear extension to existing house and construction of new single storey extension to the rear of the existing house.

Application No.: APP/15/01263 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Ms D Daly Agent: Location: Lea Wood, FLECK LANE, NEWTON, CH48 1LA Proposal: Vertical extension to create a first floor level within the existing house footprint with a side and rear extension and rebuilding and relocating the existing garage.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 21 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01265 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Claughton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 12/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr N Williams Applicant: Agent: AHR Location: St Peters Roman Catholic Aided Primary School, ST PETERS WAY, NOCTORUM, CH43 9QR Proposal: To install a new pedestrian access gate to the front elevation and a railing on the existing path and relocation of school sign

Application No.: APP/15/01268 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mrs Jacqui Brewster Agent: LHGProjects Location: Westmead, 44 CALDY ROAD, WEST KIRBY, CH48 2HQ Proposal: Two storey rear extension, alteration to terrace/provision of decked area. Alterations to front elevation to form glass gable

Application No.: DEM/15/01269 Application Type: Prior Notification of Demolition Ward: Birkenhead and Decision Level: Delegated Tranmere Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Mr K Spilsbury Applicant: Agent: Advisian (WorleyParsons Group) Location: NATIONAL GRID SITE, HIND STREET, TRANMERE, CH41 5DA Proposal: Demolition/dismantling of 4 No. buildings/structures (the former training centre, the former offices, the redundant water tower and adjacent anciliary building).

Application No.: RESX/15/01271 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 13/10/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mr & Mrs Allen Agent: Mr Pete Eccles Location: 1 DOVEDALE CLOSE, PRENTON, CH43 0SB Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 4m for which the maximum height would be 3.3m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.3m

Application No.: APP/15/01272 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 06/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Strode Agent: Condy & Lofthouse Ltd Location: 2 BELMONT ROAD, WEST KIRBY, CH48 5EZ Proposal: Demolition of existing conservatory and proposed two-storey extension to the rear of the property with some internal remodelling.

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 22 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01275 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr John Callcott Agent: Lightblue solutions Ltd Location: Oakcroft, 21 WELL LANE, GAYTON, CH60 8NQ Proposal: Extension to the front elevation of the garage.

Application No.: ADV/15/01279 Application Type: Advertisement Consent Ward: Liscard Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: SIMONS DESIGN Location: Boots Chemist, 36 LISCARD WAY, LISCARD, CH44 5TP Proposal: Removal of existing projecting green cross fascia box & replace with new projecting green cross.

Application No.: APP/15/01280 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Liscard Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Agent: SIMONS DESIGN Location: Boots Chemist, 36 LISCARD WAY, LISCARD, CH44 5TP Proposal: Amendments to shop frontage.

Application No.: APP/15/01281 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: West Kirby and Decision Level: Delegated Thurstaston Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Miss Michelle Hadfield Agent: Location: 4A GROSVENOR AVENUE, WEST KIRBY, CH48 7HA Proposal: Demolition of existing single storey extension to the rear of ground floor flat, and construct new single storey extension.

Application No.: APP/15/01282 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Pensby and Thingwall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 11/11/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Gary Hodgson Agent: Collins Architecture Location: 8 OLD MEADOW ROAD, PENSBY, CH61 5UU Proposal: Erection of new dwelling and associated works

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 23 of 25 Application No.: APP/15/01283 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 02/11/2015 Decision: Refuse Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mrs F Evans Agent: Location: 4 Seabank Cottages, BENNETS LANE, MEOLS Proposal: To take down the existing two-storey rear outrigger and construct a two-storey side and rear extension

Application No.: APP/15/01289 Application Type: Full Planning Permission Ward: Oxton Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 29/10/2015 Decision: Approve Case Officer: Mr M Parry-Davies Applicant: Mr D McCannon Agent: Location: West Ridge, INGESTRE ROAD, OXTON, CH43 5TZ Proposal: Detail design of dwelling house plot 3

Application No.: RESX/15/01308 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Heswall Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 02/11/2015 Decision: Prior Approval Refused Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mrs Jenny Cowan Agent: RADM Architects Location: 102 DOWNHAM ROAD SOUTH, HESWALL, CH60 5SQ Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 6m for which the maximum height would be 3.991m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.4m

Application No.: RESX/15/01309 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Hoylake and Meols Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 28/10/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Mrs J McMahon Applicant: Mr Wayne Johnstone Agent: Location: 32 GUFFITTS RAKE, MEOLS, CH47 7AD Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 4m for which the maximum height would be 3.7m and for which the height of the eaves would be 3.3m

Application No.: RESX/15/01342 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Decision Level: Delegated Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Mrs MA Jackson Applicant: Mr & Mrs Woolland Agent: The Kenefick Jones Partnership Location: 265 BROOKHURST AVENUE, EASTHAM, CH63 0PG Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 4.5m for which the maximum height would be 3.932m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.450m

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 24 of 25 Application No.: RESX/15/01344 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Leasowe and Moreton Decision Level: Delegated East Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Miss A McDougall Applicant: Mrs P Wise Agent: Bryson McHugh Architects Location: 9 GLEBELANDS ROAD, MORETON, CH46 0PW Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 6m for which the maximum height would be 3.5m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.4m

Application No.: RESX/15/01359 Application Type: Prior Approval Householder PD Ward: Leasowe and Moreton Decision Level: Delegated East Decision Date: 10/11/2015 Decision: Prior approval is not required Case Officer: Mr P Howson Applicant: Mr Andy Carrier Agent: Garry Usherwood Associaties Location: 8 BURNLEY ROAD, MORETON, CH46 9QF Proposal: Erection of a single storey rear extension which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 7m for which the maximum height would be 4m and for which the height of the eaves would be 2.8m

Total Number of Applications Decided: 122

Summary of data

Total Per D ecision Ty Approve pe 103 Lawful Use 2

Permission Required 1

Prior Approval Given 1

Prior approval is not required 8

Prior approval is required 1

Prior Approval Refused 1

Refuse 3

Withdrawn 2

Report Total 122

H:\TechServ\DCData\Crystal Reports\DC Reports\Delegated Decisions for committee agenda.rpt Page 25 of 25