Crime Investigation Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crime Investigation Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Crime Investigation Standard Operating Procedure Notice: This document has been made available through the Police Service of Scotland Freedom of Information Publication Scheme. It should not be utilised as guidance or instruction by any police officer or employee as it may have been redacted due to legal exemptions Owning Department: SCD – Major Crime Version Number: 10.00 (Publication Scheme) Date Published: 28/11/2018 Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) Compliance Record Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment (EqHRIA):- 26/11/2018 Date Completed / Reviewed: Information Management Compliant: Yes Health and Safety Compliant: Yes Publication Scheme Compliant: Yes Version Control Table Version History of Amendments Approval Date 1.00 Initial approved version 29/03/2013 1.01 Minor update to section 10.5 03/04/2013 2.00 Update to include Schengen 07/04/2015 Revision of sections 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17 18, 19, 22, 25, 26, 27 and 28. New Section 24 added regards Records Management. 3.00 25/11/2017 Updated formatting applied; grammatical amendments; corrected hyperlinks to associated documents and forms. Full review of SOP to ensure compliance with 4.00 15/01/2018 Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016 Policy Support administrative amendments only: Former ‘ACPOS Manual of Guidance on Cross Border Powers’ removed from Appendix ‘L’ as the document has been archived. Typing error 5.00 07/02/2018 corrected at 27.7. Broken hyperlinks repaired. (Yellow highlight from previous version left in situ due to short passage of time since previous publication which contained significant changes). Update to 7.3.4 and 7.3.5 regarding digitally 6.00 26/02/2018 recorded interview considerations. Update to Section 26 to reflect changes in 7.00 legislation in relation to Cross Border Powers. 06/03/2018 Addition of Appendix ‘N’ Update to Section 26 to provide clarification on ‘Cross Border Powers’ with new paragraphs 26.14 and 26.15 inserted. Reference to two archived 8.00 SOPs (PNC and CHS) removed from Appendix ‘L’ 03/05/2018 and replaced with their respective user manuals. Updated to reflect changes in data protection legislation Update to Section 26.20 to provide clarification with regards to offences committed in England, Wales or 9.00 13/06/2018 Northern Ireland where the suspect resides in Scotland. Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) 2 Police Act 1997 changed to Investigatory Powers 10.00 Act (IPA) 2016 in Section 23.4 and 23.5. Appendix 27/11/2018 ‘K’ updated with reference to IPA. Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) 3 Contents 1. Purpose 2. Completion of Crime Report / Crime File (Or Equivalent) 3. Allocation of Enquiries 4. Locus Management 5. Arrest 6 Investigative Liberation 7. Interviewing of Suspects 8. Identification of Suspects 9. Interview Advisor 10. Community Advisors 11. Impact Assessment 12. Forensic Strategy 13. Family Liaison 14. Mass Death Protocol 15. Major Crime Investigation 16. Intelligence Cells 17. Home Office Large Major Enquiry System (HOLMES) 18. Review Process 19. Unresolved Case Review 20. Application for Warrants 21. Locate/Trace Packages 22. Digital Media Investigation 23. Mobile Phone Crime 24. Productions 25. Records Management 26. Cross Border Powers 27. International Enquiries 28. Schengen Information System (Second Generation) (SISII) 29. Serious Crime Analysis Section (SCAS) Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) 4 Appendices Appendix ‘A’ Location of Force Digital Interview Recorded / Remote Monitoring Appendix ‘B’ Forth Valley (C Division) Appendix ‘C’ Dumfries and Galloway (V Division) Appendix ‘D’ Fife (P Division) Appendix ‘E’ North East (A Division) Appendix ‘F’ Edinburgh, the Lothians and Scottish Borders (E and J Divisions) Appendix ‘G’ Highlands and Islands (N Division) Appendix ‘H’ Strathclyde (G, K, L, Q, U Divisions) Appendix ‘I’ Tayside (D Division) Investigative Liberation Appeals – Occurrence Report Guidance Appendix ‘J’ Notes Appendix ‘K’ List of Associated Legislation Appendix ‘L’ List of Associated Reference Documents Appendix ‘M’ List of Associated Forms Appendix ‘N’ Cross Border Powers - Flowcharts Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) 5 1. Purpose 1.1 This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) supports the Police Service of Scotland, hereafter referred to as Police Scotland, Crime Investigation Policy. 1.2 This SOP provides Officers / Police Staff with a general guide to the investigation of crime. This guide is not an exhaustive list for investigators but is designed to assist investigators in where to seek guidance on specific matters. 1.3 Where a crime has been committed it is the duty of the Police to trace the offender and bring them to justice. Police Scotland recognises that the investigation of crime requires a high degree of cooperation between all departments/stakeholders/partner agencies to achieve this goal. 1.4 In addition to the information contained herein, further guidance can be found in the legislation and documents summarised in Appendix ‘K’ and Appendix ‘L’ respectively. 2. Completion of Crime Report / Crime File (Or Equivalent) 2.1 It is the duty of a Constable to take such lawful measures and make such reports to the appropriate prosecutor, as may be needed to bring offenders with all due speed to justice (Section 20(1)(d) Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012). 2.2 The first officer attending the scene of a crime will generally be responsible for ensuring that a Crime Report / Crime File is raised in accordance with the Crime Recording SOP. It is also the responsibility of the first response officers to carry out initial investigations including obtaining witness details and statements, scene preservations, evidence recovery and arrest of any perpetrators at the locus or nearby vicinity. 2.3 In instances where immediate assistance from the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) is required, the attending officer should immediately notify the CID and their supervisor, via the Control Room to afford the CID the opportunity to attend the locus. In the following circumstances the CID must be notified: Suspicious Deaths - Homicide, Drug Related Deaths, Suicide, Fatal Fires etc; Attempted Murder; Serious Assault; Robbery / Attempted Robbery; Sexual Crimes; Abduction / Attempted Abduction; Crimes where Firearms are involved; Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) 6 Death in Police Custody; Sudden Unexplained Death in Infancy (SUDI); Bogus Workmen; 2.4 This list is not exhaustive and officers should consult CID where clarification is required. 2.5 Good initial enquiry at the locus is essential. If such action is undertaken and all information recorded on the ‘enquiry update’ section of the crime report, this may negate the need for further enquiry by other officers. 3. Allocation of Enquiries 3.1 Where a Crime Report / Crime File is raised, the Crime Manager (or equivalent) will determine the allocation of crime reports/files to ensure that professional and thorough enquiries are carried out. All enquiries are to be channelled to the enquiry officer via their line manager, through the recognised Crime Management System in each Local Policing Area. 3.2 Crime Reports / Crime Files (or equivalent) should be monitored and checked by line managers to ensure that they are maintained to a consistently high standard, that enquiries are completed and that resultant Standard Police Reports (SPR2) are transmitted timeously. Refer to Case Reporting SOP for guidance on reports to the Procurator Fiscal (PF). 3.3 Where no SPR2 is being submitted, enquiry updates should be submitted to reflect that all avenues of investigation have been exhausted in an attempt to trace the perpetrator; this will inform subsequent enquiry officers in the event that a person is detected at a later date. 3.4 Where officers are abstracted or otherwise unable to complete the appropriate enquiries, it is the responsibility of the line manager to ensure that the crime report is reallocated to an appropriate officer within their shift/group or via the Crime Manager. Such reallocation and the reason for same should be detailed on the report. 3.5 Where it becomes apparent that a suspect to a crime is a serving police officer or member of police staff from anywhere in the UK, the Professional Standards Department should be notified without delay. 3.6 Where the suspect is from a force outside Scotland, the Professional Standards Department will notify the relevant Force. In such instances all records relating to the case should be restricted. Refer to Complaints About The Police SOP. Version 10.00 (Publication Scheme) 7 4. Locus Management 4.1 Any activity at a scene prior to the deployment of a Crime Scene Manager (CSM) has a direct bearing on the success or otherwise of any subsequent forensic activity. Crime Scene preservation is paramount in any investigation. 4.2 The control of a scene of a major incident/investigation will fall to the CSM at the earliest opportunity, once allocated by the Senior Investigating Officer (SIO). Further information and guidance is contained within the Crime Scene Management Manual of Guidance. The following information is intended for initial attending officers. 4.3 One of the most crucial aspects of any investigation is the effective management of its scenes. This is necessary in order to realise the full potential of all forensic opportunities that may assist in determining the events or solving the matter under investigation. 4.4 Forensic evidence may be compromised by the lack of basic scene preservation procedures. It is vital to protect a scene immediately upon arrival by taking firm and active steps to prevent unnecessary and unauthorised entry. 4.5 Initial Actions by Police 4.5.1 Without prejudice to the primary function of the police, which is to preserve life, where death or life threatening injury is reported and the circumstances appear criminal, unexplained or suspicious, or some other serious crime is apparent, the scene should always be approached and treated as such until the evidence determines otherwise.
Recommended publications
  • Examining the Test: an Evaluation of the Police Standard Entrance Test. INSTITUTION Scottish Council for Research in Education
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 249 TM 027 914 AUTHOR Wilson, Valerie; Glissov, Peter; Somekh, Bridget TITLE Examining the Test: An Evaluation of the Police Standard Entrance Test. INSTITUTION Scottish Council for Research in Education. SPONS AGENCY Scottish Office Education and Industry Dept., Edinburgh. ISBN ISBN-0-7480-5554-1 ISSN ISSN-0950-2254 PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 104p. AVAILABLE FROM HMSO Bookshop, 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh, EH3 9AZ; Scotland, United Kingdom (5 British pounds). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Employment Qualifications; Foreign Countries; Job Skills; Minority Groups; *Occupational Tests; *Police; Test Bias; *Test Interpretation; Test Use; *Testing Problems IDENTIFIERS *Scotland ABSTRACT In June 1995, the Scottish Council for Research in Education began a 5-month study of the Standard Entrance Examination (SET) to the police in Scotland. The first phase was an analysis of existing recruitment and selection statistics from the eight Scottish police forces. Phase Two was a study of two police forces using a case study methodology: Identified issues were then circulated using the Delphi approach to all eight forces. There was a consensus that both society and the police are changing, and that disparate functional maps of a police officer's job have been developed. It was generally recognized that recruitment and selection are important, but time-consuming, aspects of police activity. Wide variations were found in practices across the eight forces, including the use of differential pass marks for the SET. Independent assessors have identified anomalies in the test indicating that it is both ambiguous and outdated in part, with differences in the readability of different versions that compromises comparability.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report
    Scottish Institute for Policing Research Annual Report 2013 Cover picture © Police Scotland © Scottish Institute for Policing Research, April 2014 2 The Scottish Institute for Policing Research A 60 Second Briefing The Scottish Institute for Policing Research (SIPR) is a strategic collaboration between 12 of Scotland’s universities1 and the Scottish police service supported by investment from Police Scotland, the Scottish Funding Council and the participating universities. Our key aims are: • To undertake high quality, independent, and relevant research; • To support knowledge exchange between researchers and practitioners and improve the research evidence base for policing policy and practice; • To expand and develop the research capacity in Scotland’s universities and the police service; • To promote the development of national and international links with researcher, practitioner and policy communities. We are an interdisciplinary Institute which brings together researchers from the social sciences, natural sciences and humanities around three broad thematic areas: Police-Community Relations; Evidence & Investigation; and Police Organization; We promote a collaborative approach to research that involves academics and practitioners working together in the creation, sharing and application of knowledge about policing; Our activities are coordinated by an Executive Committee comprising academic researchers and chief police officers, and we are accountable to a Board of Governance which includes the Principals of the participating universities
    [Show full text]
  • List of Police, Prison & Court Personnel Charged Or Convicted Of
    List of Police, Prison & Court Personnel charged or convicted of an offence 2009 to 2021 – V40 16/03/2021 - (Discard all previous versions) Please only share this original version. Consent is not given to edit or change this document in any way. - [email protected] © Date Name Police Force Offence Result Source 16th March 2021 PC Wayne Couzens Metropolitan Police Charged with murder Proceeding Source: 15th March 2021 Sgt Ben Lister West Yorkshire Police Charged with rape Proceeding Source: 9th March 2021 PC Jonathan Finch Hampshire Police Gross Misconduct (sexual exposure) Sacked Source: 2nd March 2021 PC Olivia Lucas Hampshire Police Gross Misconduct (Lying) Resigned Source: 22nd Feb 2021 PC Tasia Stephens South Wales Police Drink Driving Banned for 15 months Source: 17th Feb 2021 Ursula Collins Metropolitan Police Charged - 8 counts of misconduct Proceeding Source: 15th Feb 2021 PO Paul Albertsen HMP Salford Theft from prisons Jailedfor 15 months Source: 15th Feb 2021 PO Paul Hewitt HMP Salford Theft from prisons Jailed for 15 months Source: 10th Feb 2021 PC Andrew Sollars Hampshire Police Sexual assault Three months suspended Source: 2nd Feb 2021 PC Alan Friday Cheshire Police Harassment Two year community order Source: 5th Jan 2021 PC Stuart Clarke Nottinghamshire Police Gross Misconduct Resigned Source: 17th Dec 2020 DC Darryl Hart Leicestershire Police Gross Misconduct Final Written Warning Source: 7th Dec 2020 Sgt Rob Adams Sussex Police Gross Misconduct Final Written Warning Source: 2nd Dec 2020 PC William Sampson South
    [Show full text]
  • Results All Competitors
    Police Sport UK Track & Field Championships & Tug of War Championships 2012 Female Female 100m (Final) PSUK Record - Janet Peacock - Northumbria 12.1 secs 1974 ws -0.2 1 Carly Sharp Lothian & Borders Police 12.67 2 Katie Morris West Midlands Police 15.15 3 Kate Lerwill South Wales Police 15.20 4 Kerri Marquis Northern Constabulary 15.42 5 Deborah Williams Essex Police 15.84 6 Bonnie Howell Essex Police 15.87 Female 1500m (Final) PSUK Record - Sally Ann Cox - Hertfordshire - 4 mins 29.48 secs - 1989 1 Sharon McHugh Metropolitan Police 5:11.93 2 Kelly Morgan South Wales Police 5:14.36 3 Jamie Robinson Lancashire Constabulary 5:31.50 4 Jacqueline Reid Metropolitan Police 6:31.09 5 Katie Johnstone Northern Constabulary 6:52.81 6 Heather Mitchell West Yorkshire Police 7:09.13 Female 200m (Final) PSUK Record - Sian Morris - South Wales - 24.81 secs - 1988 ws -0.9 1 Carly Sharp Lothian & Borders Police 25.98 2 Jamie Robinson Lancashire Constabulary 32.71 3 Kerri Marquis Northern Constabulary 32.75 4 Kate Lerwill South Wales Police 33.14 Female 400m (Final) PSUK Record - Mary McClung - Lothian & Borders - 54.8 secs - 2000 1 Katherine Reeves Metropolitan Police 63.16 2 Katherine Winrow Cumbria Constabulary 73.36 3 Katie Johnstone Northern Constabulary 73.66 4 Kate Lerwill South Wales Police 79.79 5 Dana Robinson Northern Constabulary 86.56 Female 4x100m (Final) PSUK Record - RUC - 50.70 secs - 1980 1 Northern Constabulary 60.65 2 Metropolitan Police 61.58 3 Strathclyde Police 63.21 Female 5000m (Final) PSUK Record - Sarah Bradbury - Hampshire
    [Show full text]
  • Ican't Believe the Summer
    Grapevine Spring cover section 2008:Layout 1 21/7/08 14:16 Page 1 Grapevine Summer 2008:Layout 1 16/7/08 10:34 Page 1 From the Editorcan't believe the summer edition of Grapevine is here Ialready. I hope you enjoy reading it as much as we have enjoyed putting it together. As ever it was exciting to see so many of our colleagues honoured NEWS at the BAWP awards ceremony. I Cynthia’s special service 2 am sure you will be inspired by reading the accolades that led to their recognition. Call for changes to NSPIS Custody software 3 This edition sees the return of the specialist roles series, with Force events round up – City of London, Staffordshire, Cumbria thanks to Jo Tearall and Lyn Parsons from Dorset Police for sharing and Lancashire 4 their experiences. If you are a female officer or member of police staff in a specialist role then please get in touch if you would like Students give their views on police uniform 5 to be featured in a future Grapevine. I am sure you will appreciate the variety of stories in this issue FEATURES from advice on mentoring and how to activate an 'Action Learning Set' to one reader’s experiences of dealing with anxiety and Spring Professional depression. As always please get in touch if you have interesting Development Day 6-9 tales to tell. Find out who won the BAWP 2008 awards and read about the PDD Dates for your diary In the spotlight 10 2008 Jennifer Hayden, who has been blind since birth, shares her experiences as a diversity officer for West Midlands 46th Annual IAWP Training Conference – Darwin, Australia, Police September 6-12.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints Recording Audit Central Scotland Police
    Complaints recording audit Central Scotland Police November 2011 Dumfries & Galloway Constabulary Fife Constabulary Grampian Police Lothian & Borders Police Northern Constabulary Strathclyde Police Tayside Police Central Scotland Police Contents Summary and key findings page 1 Summary of recommendations page 1 Commissioner’s role page 2 Introduction and scope page 2 Background page 3 Methodology page 3‐4 Findings and recommendations page 4‐6 Conclusion page 6 Summary and key findings Three Complaint About the Police cases were identified from the period audited 2010 – 11 as not having been recorded. This represents 0.6 % (3/510) of the total sample size examined and as such is the non – recording rate of complaints about the police in respect of Central Scotland Police. Reflecting the audit findings an overall assurance level has been applied to the initial recording of complaints about the police by Central Scotland Police as follows: Substantial Assurance This is because the initial recording of complaints about the police was considered to be generally robust, supported by sophisticated procedures for the handling of correspondence and well trained staff. However, the lack of a formal audit process to ensure consistency in recording practices is viewed as a weakness. The recommendations made provide an opportunity for the force to enhance confidence in their overall recording practices. Assurance level Definition Sound system of control designed to achieve the system FULL objectives. Essentially a sound system but with weaknesses that put SUBSTANTIAL some system objectives at risk. Weaknesses in the system of controls put system LIMITED objectives at risk. Control is weak leaving the system open to significant NIL error or abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Worn Video
    OFFICIAL Agenda Item 5.3 Meeting SPA Policing Performance Date 8 June 2021 Location Video Conference Title of Paper Body Worn Video – Engagement, Evaluation & Business Case Development Presented By ACC Kenneth MacDonald, Criminal Justice Recommendation to Members For Discussion Appendix Attached Yes – Appendix A - Insight and Engagement Report, Appendix B - BWV Critical Path Deliverables Appendix C - North East Evaluation Report PURPOSE The paper will provide an update in respect of the Body Worn Video work stream for armed policing and activity in relation to the Police Scotland Body Worn Video roll out. Members are invited to discuss the content of this paper. SPA Policing Performance Committee Body Worn Video - Engagement, Evaluation & Business Case Development 8 June 2021 1 OFFICIAL OFFICIAL 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 The purpose of this paper is to provide an update in respect of the Body Worn Video (BWV) work stream following the last meeting of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) Policing Performance Committee on 9 March 2021. 2. FURTHER DETAIL ON THE REPORT TOPIC 2.1 In 2016, the National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) recommended that BWV should be rolled out to Authorised Firearms Officers within all Home Office forces. Although not a Home Office force and therefore not bound by the recommendation, Police Scotland now has the only armed policing unit in the UK without BWV. 2.2 The Dame Elish Angiolini Independent Review into complaints handling, investigation and misconduct issues, published on 11 November 2020, does not make specific reference to armed policing but recommends that Police Scotland should accelerate its plans to expand the use of body worn video technology.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL POLICE MEMORIAL DAY Sunday 27 September 2020 This Year, As a Nation, We Have Been Challenged in Ways We Could Never Have Anticipated
    NATIONAL POLICE MEMORIAL DAY Sunday 27 September 2020 This year, as a Nation, we have been challenged in ways we could never have anticipated. We have faced Throughout the United Kingdom, our Police Forces deliver a service that is the envy of the world. an unseen,Our P butolic deadlye Offic ethreatrs and amid Civil idisruptedan Suppor andt Sta ever-changingff, drawn from circumstances.a multitude of dHowever,iverse ba cthroughoutkgrounds, all the uncertainty,but unified we by have a sen learnedse of co masm neveritmen beforet and d tout yvalue, dist ithosenguish things them sofel vwhiches on wea d acanily balwaysasis th rbeou gcertainh – such asth theeir csteadfastourage, c odedicationnsideration toan dduty sen sofi tiourvity Policeto th eForces needs throughoutof those the they p roUnitedtect. Kingdom. Our officersTShinroceu gthh oehaveu Pt othl icemete U anthisriete sdoinvisible K dinegedpoly m threati,n otuerg rPa owithtleicde visible wFoitrhceins dtcourageheeli vceor ma mandseurv nicommitment,icteie tsh taht eiys tsheer veprovidingen, vtyh oerfe t h cethea nw obcalmrel da. reassuranceOteumr pPto athatlticioen Ohas foffri cbeenseorcsi ea tnsoyd t essentialoC itvailkiaen y oS utorp p coourrmt mScommunitiestiatmff, ednrta wfonr gfrr oadaymnt e ad and.m Hu onight.ltwiteuvde er , oThatI fw do iuvsucheldrs lei k extraordinarybe atcok gtarokeu ntdhs is, bouptp uonrtifuiendit yb yt oa esxepnrses os fm coy mspmeictimale andt manirda tdiounty f, odri stthineg muisahn yth aecmtss eolfv esse loflne sas ndeasilsy abnads isin tdhirvoiduugahl commitmenttheir co ushouldrage, c soon softeniderat ioben takenand s efornsi tgrantedivity to isth ea nemeasureeds of thofo showe th ewey phaverote ccomet. to expect nothing less thanher theoism highest which standardsoccur dai lfromy.
    [Show full text]
  • Grampian Police Return Home Welfare Interview Pilot for Young Runaways
    GRAMPIAN POLICE RETURN HOME WELFARE INTERVIEW PILOT FOR YOUNG RUNAWAYS PILOT EVALUATION University of Stirling And Ipsos MORI ScotlAnd FINAL REPORT May 2010 University of Stirling CHeryl Burgess MArgAret MAllocH FionA MitcHell Ipsos MORI ScotlAnd VAnessA CHAn JAne Eunson LorrAine MurrAy 2 Acknowledgements We would like to thank everyone who participated in this evaluation, particularly the respondents who made time available to speak with us. We are extremely grateful to the young people who were prepared to share their experiences of the RHWI with us. Frances McKendrick provided us with data throughout the evaluation and we have appreciated her assistance in responding to queries and requests. Thanks also to the Evaluation Sub‐group for their input. 3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................13 BACKGROUND TO PILOT ........................................................................14 RESPONDING TO YOUNG RUNAWAYS: PRACTICE IN EACH AREA ....17 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES .....................................................................21 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................21 FINDINGS ................................................................................................. 28 Profile of young People..........................................................................28 CHArActeristics of young people
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Effects of Police Body-Born Cameras on Use of Force During Arrests: a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Large British Police Force
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo European Journal of Criminology TITLE: Testing the Effects of Police Body-Born Cameras on Use of Force during Arrests: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Large British Police Force Darren Henstock † and Barak Ariel ‡ † Cantab. Police Executive Programme, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue Cambridge CB3 9DA UK, +44.1223.335360, [email protected] ‡ Corresponding author; PhD, Lecturer, Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law, Hebrew University, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 91905 Israel, +972.2.5882502; [email protected]; Lecturer in Experimental Criminology, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue Cambridge CB3 9DA UK, +44.1223.767378, [email protected] The authors declare no conflict of interests The UK BWC RCT TESTING THE EFFECTS OF POLICE BODY-BORN CAMERAS ON USE OF FORCE DURING ARRESTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL IN A LARGE BRITISH POLICE FORCE HIGHLIGHTS There is, at present, a world-wide uncontrolled social experiment taking place within policing on body-worn-cameras, without much evidence from controlled studies Our randomized-controlled-trial aims to reveal the conditions under which body-worn- cameras can effect arrest dynamics in England and Wales Scholars interested in use of force should differentiate between “compliant handcuffs” which are part of the arrest procedure rather than use-of-force per se, and “noncompliant handcuffing”, which form a step on the force continuum. Overall, the odds of use of force while using body-worn-cameras are 50% lower than control conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing by Consent: Understanding and Improving Relations Between Gypsies, Roma, Travellers and the Police
    Policing by consent: Understanding and improving relations between Gypsies, Roma, Travellers and the police 1 © The Traveller Movement Acknowledgements The Traveller Movement (TM) is extremely grateful to all the community members, police officers and PCSOs who gave up their time to participate in this study. It would also like to thank Thames Valley Police, Cheshire Constabulary, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, the Met and Sussex Police for facilitating interviews with officers. Special thanks are also owed to Leeds Gypsy and Traveller Exchange, Irish Community Care Merseyside and staff members at the Traveller Movement for helping to coordinate interviews. TM wishes to express its gratitude to members of the steering group for providing invaluable advice and guidance at all stages of the project. Members include Mark Watson from Cheshire Police and a TM Trustee, Nick Glynn from the Open Society Initiative for Europe, Jim Davies co-founder of the Gypsy Roma Traveller Police Association and formerly a PC with Thames Valley Police, Professor Margaret Greenfields of Buckinghamshire New University, Laura Greason from the Roma Support Group, Rosemary Lloyd from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and Sabrina Stuart from TM. TM would also like to thank Paul Quinton from the College of Policing, John Coxhead from the East Midlands Policing Academic Collaboration, Petr Torak MBE co-founder of the Gypsy Roma Traveller Police Association and formerly a PC with Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Cathay Birch and Josie O’Driscoll for their advice and guidance. TM would like to thank Matt Brindley, former member of its policy team, for his hard work and dedication in conducting the research and drafting the report.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Viewing Archiving 300
    B26 THE LONDON GAZETTE SATURDAY 12 JUNE 1999 SUPPLEMENT No. 1 Queen's Police Medal Queen's Fire Service Medal Q.P.M. Q.F.S.M. ENGLAND AND WALES ENGLAND AND WALES Dennis Proctor BISHOP, Constable, Greater Manchester Barry DIXON, Assistant Chief Fire Officer, Greater Police. Manchester County Fire Service. Michael BURDIS, Detective Chief Superintendent, South Ian Christopher DOMINY, Assistant Chief Fire Officer, Yorkshire Police. Dorset Fire and Rescue Service. Duncan Nigel CROLL, Commander, Metropolitan Police. Michael James NORTON, Station Officer, West Midlands John Stanley Charles CUIXUM, Assistant Chief Constable Fire Service. (Designated), Suffolk Constabulary. Kenneth Peter RATCLIFFE, Divisional Officer III, Alan GOLDSMITH, Deputy Chief Constable, Lincolnshire Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service. Police. Graham Thomas Thompson, Deputy Chief Fire Officer, James Maurice HART, Assistant Commissioner, City of London Police. Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service. Thomas Carl LLOYD, Commander, Metropolitan Police. SCOTLAND Francis Andrew MAY, lately Deputy Chief Constable, Dorset Police. Hugh Alastair ANDERSON, Retained Sub-Officer, Fife Thomas MORRISON, Chief Superintendent, Thames Fire and Rescue Service. Valley Police. Gordon George KENNEDY, Assistant Firemaster, Robert Dallas PACKHAM, Deputy Director General, Grampian Fire Brigade. National Crime Squad. NORTHERN IRELAND George Gilchrist RUSSELL, lately Superintendent, Metropolitan Police. Kenneth Hugh SPENCE, Station Officer, Belfast Fire Michael Brendan SEMPLE, Detective Superintendent,
    [Show full text]