The Dublin Fenians After the Rising, 1867-79

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dublin Fenians After the Rising, 1867-79 The Dublin Fenians after the Rising, 1867-79 著者 Takagami Shin-ichi 出版者 Institute of Comparative Economic Studies, Hosei University journal or 比較経済研究所ワーキングペーパー publication title volume 28 page range 1-54 year 1992-02-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10114/4194 HoseIUniveUslIy lCES lleIand-JapanPapeIS HOSEIUNIV. Number7 TheDublinFenians aftertherisin8,1867-79 Shin-ichiTAKAGAMI Februaryl992 lnsliIutooIComparaIivoEconomlcStudies HosBIUnlve『siIy 4342Alhara-chooMachlda-shl Tokyo,194-O2Japan TELO427-83-2330 TheDublinFeniansaftertherising,1867-79 Shm-ichiTAKAGAMI KeioUniversity Onl7Marchl858thesecretsocietylaternamedthelrishRepublica、 Brotherhood(LR.B、)wasestablishedinDublinanditsmemberswerecalled Fenians・TheirpurposewastooverthrowEnglishrulemlrelandbyphysical force,establishinganlrishrepublic、On5Marchl867theFenianrising occurred・ThispaperexaminestheDublinFeniansfromtheendofthefailed risingtol879whentheLandWar,themajorissueoflatenineteenthcentury lrishhistory,tookplace、TheDublinFenianorganisationwasfarfromthemam sceneoftheLandWar・AsaterminaldatewehavechosenJanuaryl879whenthe SupremeCounciloftheLR.B、,asweshallsee,heldanimportantmeetingin Paristodiscussthe‘NewDeparture’一aproposalbyJohnDevoyandother membersofClannaGaelinOctpberl878tptheeffectthattheFeniansshould activelyenqagenotonlyinparliamentaryactivitiesbutalsoinagrarian lssues・ TheSupremeCouncilrejectedtheNewDepartureandconfirmed theirphysicalforceprinciple・Inconsequence,theLR.B、asabodydidnot takeaprominentroleintheLandWar・TheCouncildecisionmoreorlesssettled theissueforDublinmembers,butmembersinrurallreland,、otablyinthe westandnorth-westcounties,seemtohavejoinedtheLandWardespitethe comparativelylargerpresenceofthepost-l867Fenlanmovementthere、 TheyearsaftertheMarchl867risingwitnessedthedeclineoftheDubli、 organisationwhichbeforetherisinghadformedatitspeaktwenty-three circlesnumberingfromseveralthousandtotenthousandmen・Inthel870s theDublinorganisatio、、everregainedthepre-risingleve1.Inlatel87Band earlyl879thenupbersintheDublinorganisationhadfallendrasticallyto576; thesenumbersbelongedtotheSupremeCouncilparty・Theotherpartywithin themovementthatledbyStephens,hadsomefollowersinDublin,butthenumber wasinsignificant.(1)Inlrelandatlargethemembershiphaddeclinedby 1 latel878andearlyl879from50,OOObeforetherisingtoabout24,000.(2) Furthermore,the1.R、B・asawholechangeditsgeographicalstrongholdsfrom MunsterandLeinstertonorthConnachtandsouthUlster・ TablelMembershipbyprovinceofthel.R、B,inthel860sandlatel870s Province 1860s Latel870s % % Leinster 44 8.43 Munster 39 19.85 Connacht 11 29.24 Ulster 6 42.48 Sources:R、V,Comerford,‘Irishnationalistpolitics,1858-70,(Pb.D,thesis,T、C,、., 1977),p・'99;Comerford,TheFeniansincontext,p、213. Thissuggestsanewl.R,B・withanagrariancharacteremerginginthel870sat theexpenceofthetown-basedoldLR.B、,inwhichtheDublinorganisationhad takenaprominentpart・ ThefirstsectionexaminestheDublinFeniansfroml867tol873・Theyear l873markedaturningpointinFenianisminDublinintwoways・ Firstly,theSupremeCouncilallowedFenianstobeinvolvedinconstitutional movementsthe Home Rulemovement・Secondly,bythel873Dublin organisation,dramaticallyreducedin口embership,wasconfinedtoasmallqroup ofmenanddidnotreviveinthel870s. PartlTheDublinFenians,1867-73 TheimpactoftheabortiverisingontheDublinorganisation F.S、L・LyonsattributedthedeclineoftheoldLR.B・to‘thefiascoofthe l867rising’:‘therecanbenodisputingthefactthattheimmediateconsequence 2 ofthefiascoofl867wastothrowthewholeFenianmovementintoconfusionand discouragementfronlwhichittooklongtorecover,.(3)Indeed,asnorisingtook placeinConnachtandU1ster,onemightsaythatthel.R、B・inLeinsterand Munsterdeclinedbecausetheyhadattemptedtoorganisetherising,while ConnachtandU1ster,notsharinginthefiasco,becamethefuturestrongholds oftheLR.B、However,alltheevidence,asfarastheDublinorganisationwas concerned,revealsthatthefailureoftherisingwasnotafatalblowtothe organisation,andthattheSupremeCouncilsucceededinreorganisingtheLR.B・ byearlyl87q lmmediatelyaftertherisingtheDublinorganisationeventhoughtintermsof startinganotherattempt、MostofthethousandsofFenians,dispersingwithout anymilitaryactionbythemorningof6March,stillhadtheirarmsandmostof theirleaderswerenotarrested・On9MarchSuperintendentRyanreceived informationthatonlOorllMarchtheFenianswouldlaunchanothermilitary action,attackingthecity・SuperintendentRyanfeltunabletodismissthe informationclaimingthat‘fewoftherespectableshopmen,clerksandartisans thattomycertainknowledgeareFeniansweretobeseenamongtheprisoners arrestedonWednesdaymorning[6March]・Ifearsomethingseriousmaybe apprehendedifthemenwillbefoundpluckyandnumerousenoughandlrepeatit thatonthisallwilldepend,astheleadersdonotlackdetermination'.(4)In spiteofSuperintendentRyan,sapprehension,nothinghappenedonllandl2 March;butanotherinfomationthatStPatrick'sDay,l7March,wasthedayfixed forthegeneralrisingreachedSuperintendentRyaninthesucceedingdays・ LaterSuperintendentRyanwasinformedthattheywouldstartarisingaboutthe 0 endofAprilorbeginningoflIay.(5)Inthiswayimmediatelyaftertherising theFeniansWhohadnotsufferedseriousmateriallosseson6Marchseemedbent onplanninganotherrebellion, Thefailureoftherisingdid,ofcourse,inevitablybringaboutconfusionin theDublinorganisation・AsthepolicetriedtoarrestFenianleadersinMarch l867,so、eCentresfledtoEnglandordisbandedtheircircles、BetweenMarchand 3 earlyAprilthepolicearrestedsevenCentres,andafurtherCentrewascaptured inJuly,Indeed,byApriltheDublinorganisationhaddisintegratedtosuchan extentthatafterAprilSuperintendentRyanreceivednofurtherinformation aboutarising・A1fredAylwardprovidedtheauthoritieswithinformation concerningtheDublinCentres:hisinformationfurnishesuswithsomedetailsof thefateoftwenty-twoofthetwenty-threecirclesknowntohaveexistedin Dublinberoretherising・Circlesrepresentedthebasicorganisationalor ェegimentalunit;eachregimentwasledbyaCentreorA,andbelowhimin descendingordertheotherranksweredenominatedasB,s,C,sand、,s、(6)Aylward statedthatsixofthetwenty-twocircleshadbrokenup;onlyfourwere positivelyconfirmedasbeingstillinexistence,andinthecaseofthe remainingtwelve,theheadsofsevenwerevariouslyaccountedforbyarrest,or flighttoEngland. Table21mpactoftherisingontheDublinorganisationinthesummerofl867 Centre Successor FateofCircle WilliamBrady mexistence BernardBrady brokenup NiallBreslinarrested SamuelClampettarrested GeoZgeConnollyarrested inexistence JosephD'Arcy inexistence JamesHayesgaveup brokenup JosephHenry HenryHughesarrested brokenup JamesKelly J,Kelly brokenup JohnKirwanarrested JohnGillerdan PatKnottoEngland 4 MichaelLambert brokenup JamesMcCabe JosephMcDonnell StephenO'Donoghuekilled EdwardO'Byrnearrested PatMonks inexistence MattO'NeilltoEngland DavidToole brokenup JosephTomkinsarrested JohnWalsharrested 22Centres Source:S.P.0.,Fenianbriefs,8. TheDublinmovement,however,wasreplacedbyaneworganisationbytheautumn ofl867・TheproblemoftheDubllnorganisationwasthelackofofficers:the Dublinorganisationlostatleasttwelveofthetwenty-threeCentreswhowerein serviceinearlyl867、ThereforetheFeniansconcentratedonappointingCentres ratherthanonexpandingthesizeofthecirclestheycommandedbYswearingin newmembersactively.(7)Intheautumnofl867Aylwardgavetheauthorities thenamesoftwenty-threemen,plusfourunknownpersons,holdinghighpositions intheDublinorganisation,toqetherwiththeiroccupationsandthenumberof theirsubordinates-inmostcaseshemadenodistinctionbetweenCentresand Bs・Table3isbasedonAylward’sinformationandotherpolicereports. Table3 TheDublinorganisaLionintheautumnofl867 Name Position Occupation No.ofSubordinates WilliamBrophy Centre carpenter 600 JD'Arcy ropemaker 60 MichaelFeely Centre carpenter 700 5 CharlesFitzsimons 280 ThomasFrancis Centre shoemaLker 65 Griffin shoemaker Griffin pawnbrokers’assistant 47530 00050 JamesKeUy shoemaker JamesKelly tailor 1 Killeen clerk JamesKmgston 2 JamesMcCabe Centre JosephMacGzath tobacconist 506700028 307000000 McEvoy foreman,timberyard 2 F)【し(し【しF)が〉が) ttt●屯t・C。Ⅱ ThomasMcGazry eeeeeee 、nnnnnn rrrZr正r eeeeeee ropemaker CharlesMcNalluara bottleglassworker MichaelMonks(1) 74512 JohnMurphy JohnNeil dairyman M、0,Loughlin JohnWalsh pawnbrokers,assistant Healy(2) 0,Connor supplierofammunition,gunmaker anon. shoemaker 45 anon.(3) anon・ chairmanofbaker'sassociation an。、.(4) Total27 4,635 Notes:(1)E、O'Byrne'scircle;(2)JohnO,Neil,sB;(3)JohnO,Neil,sB;(4)William Brophy,sbrotherinlaW・ Sources:S.P.0.,Fenianbriefs,8;SuptRyantoC、P.,5NoLl867(C、S、0.,R・P. 6 1867/l9381on2266R〕;SuptRyantoGP.,gNov、1867(C、S、0.,R、P,1867/l9348 onl867/19481);SuptRyantoC・P.,l1Nov・’867(C、S、0.,R・P、1867/20374);Supt RyantoC、P.,20Jan、1868(C、S、0.,R・P、1868/545on3105R). Table3showsthattherewereatleasteleve、CentresintheDublin organisation・TheoreticallYacircleconsistedof820men,butCentrescouldform circleswithoutmeetingthetheoreticalnumber・ThomasFrancis,althoughhehad only65men,wasaCentre・Judgingfromthenumberofmenundertheir direction,CharlesFitzsimons(whohad280),JamesKelly(150),JamesKingston(200) andMcEvoy(200)mighthavebeenCentres・Itwouldnotbewrongtoassumethat therewereatleastfifteencirclesmtheDublinorganisationnumberingover 4,635menintheautumnofl867・ComparedwiththeCentresbeforethe rising,whatisstrikingisthelackofcontinuity:onlythreeCentres- JP,Arcy,JamesKellyandJamesNcCabe-seemtohavecontinuedworkfrombefore therising.(8)Inotherwords,aftertherising,acompletelynewleadership emergedintheDublinorganisation・Whilethefallureoftherisingdamaged theorganisationandthenumbersweresmaller,withinaboutsixmonthsthe DublinFenianshadsucceededinreorganisingthemselves・ Bytheautumnofl867theDublinorganisationwdsunderthecontrolofa DirectoryconsistingofthreeCentres,JohnWalsh,MichaelFeely,andJohnMurphy・ AboveallJohnWalshwasthemostactiveCentreaftertherising;and
Recommended publications
  • Making Fenians: the Transnational Constitutive Rhetoric of Revolutionary Irish Nationalism, 1858-1876
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE 8-2014 Making Fenians: The Transnational Constitutive Rhetoric of Revolutionary Irish Nationalism, 1858-1876 Timothy Richard Dougherty Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Modern Languages Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Dougherty, Timothy Richard, "Making Fenians: The Transnational Constitutive Rhetoric of Revolutionary Irish Nationalism, 1858-1876" (2014). Dissertations - ALL. 143. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/143 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This dissertation traces the constitutive rhetorical strategies of revolutionary Irish nationalists operating transnationally from 1858-1876. Collectively known as the Fenians, they consisted of the Irish Republican Brotherhood in the United Kingdom and the Fenian Brotherhood in North America. Conceptually grounded in the main schools of Burkean constitutive rhetoric, it examines public and private letters, speeches, Constitutions, Convention Proceedings, published propaganda, and newspaper arguments of the Fenian counterpublic. It argues two main points. First, the separate national constraints imposed by England and the United States necessitated discursive and non- discursive rhetorical responses in each locale that made
    [Show full text]
  • Year 13 As History
    YEAR 13 AS HISTORY CHALLENGE AND CRISIS IN IRELAND WEEK 5 Hello everyone • Hope that you and your families are coping okay. You will have heard that the AS exams for this year will not now be taking place and that you will be awarded a grade from teacher assessment. The data needed for this is currently being compiled, and myself and Mr McClean will come to an agreed grade. In the meantime, we have been asked to continue with a revision programme for the AS course. • This week you are asked to revise thoroughly all of your notes on the causes of the Fenian Rising. • After your revision, answer qs 1 and 2 on this topic from page 4 of the Notes questions handout. • This is a much shorter revision week for you – so you have no excuses not to thoroughly revise this topic! REVISION TEST – WEEK FIVE • There is only one short answer (8 mark) Revision question this week. • On the next slides is the markscheme for this question. • Please do not refer to this document until after you have attempted to answer the questions. • QUESTION 1 – Explain the causes of the Fenian Rising of 1867. MARKSCHEME • Explain the causes of the Fenian Rising of 1867. • Level 1 ([0]–[2]) • Answers at this level recall, select and deploy historical knowledge in an episodic or largely inaccurate manner. • Level 2 ([3]–[4]) • Answers will have a limited focus on the causes of the Fenian Rising of 1867. There may be a general reference to the desire to establish an independent Irish republic, to be achieved by force.
    [Show full text]
  • Secret Societies and the Easter Rising
    Dominican Scholar Senior Theses Student Scholarship 5-2016 The Power of a Secret: Secret Societies and the Easter Rising Sierra M. Harlan Dominican University of California https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2016.HIST.ST.01 Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Harlan, Sierra M., "The Power of a Secret: Secret Societies and the Easter Rising" (2016). Senior Theses. 49. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2016.HIST.ST.01 This Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POWER OF A SECRET: SECRET SOCIETIES AND THE EASTER RISING A senior thesis submitted to the History Faculty of Dominican University of California in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Bachelor of Arts in History by Sierra Harlan San Rafael, California May 2016 Harlan ii © 2016 Sierra Harlan All Rights Reserved. Harlan iii Acknowledgments This paper would not have been possible without the amazing support and at times prodding of my family and friends. I specifically would like to thank my father, without him it would not have been possible for me to attend this school or accomplish this paper. He is an amazing man and an entire page could be written about the ways he has helped me, not only this year but my entire life. As a historian I am indebted to a number of librarians and researchers, first and foremost is Michael Pujals, who helped me expedite many problems and was consistently reachable to answer my questions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 FENIANISM RECONSIDERED 1. F.L. Crilly, the Fenian Movement
    Notes 1 FENIANISM RECONSIDERED 1. F.L. Crilly, The Fenian Movement: the Story of the Manchester Martyrs (London, 1908) 59. 2. The Whiggish Illustrated London News reported on 25 May 1854 that the American consul in London, G.N. Sanders, had given a dinner on the eve of Washington's birthday to what amounted to a who's who of European revolutionists, including: Kossuth, Mazzini, Ledru-Rollin, Garibaldi, Orsini, Pulksy and Hertzen. All were at that time living in exile in the English capital. 3. John Newsinger, Fenianism in Mid-Victorian Britain (London, 1994) 1-3. 4. The Irishman, 16 Mar. 1867, 592. 5. T.W. Moody,Davitt and the Irish Revolution, 1846-82 (Oxford, 1981) 41. 6. Paul Bew, Land and the National Question in Ireland, 1858-82 (Dublin, 1978) 40. 7. R. Pigott, Personal Recollections of an Irish Nationalist Journalist (Dublin, 1882) 133-4. 8. David Thornley, Isaac Butt and Home Rule (London, 1964) 13. 9. Quoted in Thomas Frost, The Secret Societies of the European Revolution, 1776-1876 ii (London, 1876) 282. 10. John Neville Figgs and Reginald Vere Laurence (eds) Selections from the Correspondence of the First Lord Acton (London, 1917), Gladstone to Acton 1 Mar. 1870, 106. 11. R.V. Comerford, The Fenians in Context: Irish Politics and Society 1848-82 (Dublin, 1985) 79 and 153. 12. Bodleian Library, Oxford Clarendon Papers Irish deposit 99, Wodehouse to Clarendon 14 May 1865. 13. Irish People, 16 April 1864, 328. A point which was also given promi­ nence in The Fenian Catechism: from the Vulgate of Sf Laurence O'Toole (New York, 1867) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenian Rising 1867
    Fenian Rising 1867 Name: Shauna Hallisey School: Coars National School The Fenian Rising took place in Ireland 1867. The Fenian brotherhood was an Irish Republican organisation founded in the United States of America, in 1858 by John O’Mahony and Micheal Dohney. They were also known as the Irish Republic Brotherhood or the Fenians. They were set up in Dublin in 1858 after the American Civil War. Daniel O’Connell had got Catholic Emancipation for Ireland, which means the people had freedom to practice their Catholic religion. But Daniel O’ Connell was not successful with getting Ireland our Independence with”The repeal of the Act of Union”. This failure is probably some of the reason why the Fenians started the rebellion. It is unclear why the Fenians rebelled because the majority of them came from relatively successful families. None of these men were in poverty as most of them were employed as farmers, carpenters, etc. The Fenians of Iveragh rose in arms on Shrove Tuesday 12th of February 1867 but it was not a major military plan. The leader of these men was a mysterious figure of John Joseph O’Conner, better known as JJ. He was born on Valentia Island and while still young emigrated to America. There he became a colonel with the Federal army during the American Civil War which left him with an obvious limp as a result of a war wound. On his return to Ivearagh at the end of 1865 he took up residence in Cahersiveen where the local police treated him with suspicion, but found no evidence against him even when they raided his lodgings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fenians in Canada
    The Fenians in Canada David A. Wilson, University of Toronto With some conspicuous exceptions, Canadian historians have traditionally regarded Fenianism as an external threat, and have generally focused their attention on the relationship between the Fenian raids and Canadian Confederation. What this perspective misses is the much more interesting issue of the Fenian movement within Canada and its connection to those American Fenians who wanted to emancipate Canadians from British imperialism -- or to invade the country, depending on your viewpoint. The subject raises fundamental questions about the political views of Irish Catholics in Canada, the dynamics of ethno-religious conflict, the development of Canada’s secret police force, and the response of the state to an ethnic revolutionary minority whose most militant members were prepared to use various forms of physical force to achieve their ends. In considering the connection between external invasion and internal subversion, it is important to realize that the Fenian general, “Fighting Tom” Sweeny, did not base his strategy on the prospect of mass Irish Canadian support. He seems to have been singularly unimpressed with the boasts of Michael Murphy, the Head Centre of the Fenians in Canada, that over 100,000 men were ready to rise against the Canadian government during the winter of 1865-66. Instead, Sweeny planned to rely on highly selective operations and local risings that would undermine the defence of Canada. Small groups of Canadian Fenians would cut the telegraph lines, destroy the railway bridge that connected Canada West and Canada East, infiltrate the Canadian militia, bribe British soldiers, and burn down government buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Ireland from the Irish: the Irish Executive’S Reaction to Transatlantic Fenianism 1864-68
    Defending Ireland from the Irish: The Irish Executive’s reaction to Transatlantic Fenianism 1864-68 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 Jerome Devitt Trinity College Dublin Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. Signed: ________________________________________ Jerome Devitt July 2018 ii Summary This thesis examines the Irish Executive’s reaction to the threat posed by transatlantic Fenianism from the closing phase of the US Civil War to the end of Fenian activity in the year following the Fenian Rising of February and March 1867. It argues that the Fenian conspiracy was the catalyst for a substantial development in the Executive’s ability to assert its control throughout the country in the name of maintaining state security. Its central argument is that the government’s adoption of a policy of deterrence, combined with the systematic reform of the composition and distribution of military and constabulary forces on the island, at first delayed and later helped to suppress the abortive rising that eventually emerged. Although the periodization is narrow, the four years in question set in motion a security policy that would influence the governance of Ireland throughout the remainder of the century. The Executive’s response, however, was influenced not only by the suppression of the Young Ireland rising in 1848, but was also guided by a wide range of transnational influences.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical and Evolutionary Study of Irish Terrorist Cells C. 1881 – 1896
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. The Terrorist Cell: An Historical and Evolutionary Study of Irish Terrorist Cells c. 1881 – 1896 A thesis presented in full fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D In Defence and Strategic Studies at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. David T.H. Osborne 2013 Abstract Within the field of terrorism studies little is understood as to how and why terrorist cells change over time and place. This is a complex question, which has evolutionary implications. That is, where do terror cells come from and why, once formed, do some succeed and some fail. To answer these questions this study uses an evolutionary methodology to analyse Victorian-era terror cells between 1881 and 1896. This was done by taking specific concepts of evolution including evolutionary variations, inheritance, diversity and selection, to model the evolutionary history of terrorist cells over time and place. In deriving this model six main evolutionary concepts were found, which were instrumental in both the planned and unplanned evolution of terrorist cells. This included, identifying adaptive characteristics that were crucial in a cell’s ability to survive and operate within a multifaceted landscape. Additional findings from this study uncovered the complex inter-dependent relationships that exist between terror cells and actors in the landscape, which resulted in uncovering sources that facilitated the evolution of cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrible Beauty: a History of Ireland Craig L
    Terrible Beauty: A History of Ireland Craig L. Foster, Research Specialist, AG® FamilySearch [email protected] EARLY IRELAND, 1169 - 1800 Christianity was brought to Ireland in the 5th century with devoted people like St. Patrick, St. Brigid of Kildare, and St. Columba of Iona. The Norman invasion of Ireland in May 1169 when Cambro-Normans and Anglo-Normans landed in Ireland at the request of Dermot MacMurragh, the deposed King of Leinster. Over the next few centuries, Cambro and Anglo-Normans intermarried with the native Irish and within a couple of generations there were the Hiberno-Normans. These Hiberno-Normans were said to be "more Irish than the Irish themselves.” The Statutes of Kilkenny were a series of thirty-five acts passed at Kilkenny in 1366. The statutes “forbade the intermarriage between the native Irish and the native English, the English fostering of Irish children, the English adoption of Irish children and use of Irish names and dress.” Conflicts: 1534-1537 Rebellion of Silken Thomas FitzGerald, 10th Earl of Kildare 1579-1583 Second Desmond Rebellion of James FitzMaurice FitzGerald of the House of Desmond 1594-1603 The Nine Years War of Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone and Red Hugh O'Donnell of Tyrconnell 1641 Irish Rebellion of 1641 led by Phelim Roe O'Neill of Kinard of the Catholic Confederation 1690 Battle of the Boyne and the defeat of the forces of the deposed King James II of England and Ireland by those of King William III, husband of Queen Mary II, daughter of James II. Plantations: Early plantations (1556–1576) Munster Plantation (1586 onwards) as a result of the Desmond Rebellions Ulster Plantation (1606 onwards) as a result of the Nine Years War Later plantations (1610–1641) Wexford (1610) – lands confiscated from the MacMurrough- Kavanagh clan Wicklow (1630s) Cromwellian land confiscation (1652) “Over 12,000 veterans of the New Model Army were awarded land in Ireland in place of their wages due” and up to 7,500 soldiers settled there.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenian Heroes and Martyrs
    4^ FENIAN HEROES AID MAPJYES. Edited, with aw Histoeical iNTEODrcTioN 03 *'^TnE Stedggi-e foe Ieish Nationautt," JOHN SAVAGE, AtmZCm Oy "'03 AST> *43, THB MODETIN BEVOmXtOWAKT HISTOHT A3a> GERTRUDE KiSTLEK MEMORIAL LIBRARY PATRICK DONAHOE, FRANKLIN STREET. 1S63. ? 'iii!!iti?yiW|MiJii|ji<];i4ytjpj,Wi^iif^^^ q6V >..S ^ % TO muCE LOST COPY AUG 2 1972 lir offering this volume to the public, a few worcls of explana- "''in ara deemed neoessaTy, uot so much for Its appi;.-' co, aa for I he niTangoment of its contents. As to its appearance, the state of Irish affairs calls for some record, and as, owiug to peculiar circumstances, the nearest ap- proach to a perfect chronicle which can now be offered, is an Eatered accortlir.g to Act of Congress, in tta year 1S63, account of fh' -e ^^ho brou,>j,ht about the.crisis and are gallantly Bi- PATKICK DONAHOE, EliU'z^liii;^- ;':i Ji it, the presiMit form was adopted. Oa"co ol' ;' ^ District Court of the District of MaEscichu In tlio Clcrk'B The arran^LiiK-nt is not entirely what might be desired by a stiict clironologist; but as the data bad to be obtained from T,-i>.l(.>Iy scattered rofcrcnciLS and correspondents—the -uieuds or i'l.niilics of those cor,iinc;uorated—and as the pages went to the ; ix'?3 ^Yhe•n wriHia, it v/as found impossible to follow perfect rlironological order. As a general rule, the characters are grouped as they acled together, ao'i '!ius help to illustrate each others lives; and a slight hint will enable the reader to follow the his- t'jiy of the Irish struggle in a direct coui'se, and to fill up, so to srca\\, the outline given in t!ic llislorical Introduclinn.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenian Rising 1867
    CHAPTER THREE THE FENIANS When Trinity College, Dublin took back direct control of their Iveragh estate in 1865, a well established group of rebels were established there already. The original national rising was planned for 1865, but due to numerous arrests of the leaders as well as a large amount of informants it had to be postponed. It was rescheduled for 11 February 1867, which turned out to be a total disaster. This was due to the uncoordinated risings which took place in February and March throughout Ireland, which resulted in fear being instilled in the people, especially the gentry and also resulted in some being transported to Australia. It is unclear why the Fenians rebelled because the majority of them came from relatively successful families. None of these men were in dire poverty as most were employed as farmers, carpenters etc. It may have been a sense of trying to move forward at a political and social level because even though financially independent they were still regarded as peasants. Daniel O’Connell had gained the first step in the road to independence for the Irish by gaining Catholic Emancipation, but he was not so successful with repeal of the Act of Union. It was this failure that may have contributed to these men to rebel in 1867 as their status had not altered with his success. The Fenians of Iveragh rose in arms on Shrove Tuesday, 12 February 1867 but it was not a major military operation. However prior to this much Fenian activity was widespread in the barony.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    A forgotten 'greater Ireland': The transatlantic development of Irish nationalism, 1848-1882 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Mulligan, Adrian Neil Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:43:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/290356 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author dkl not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographicaHy in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9' black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy fix an additional charge.
    [Show full text]