Pierre Duhem and Neo-Thomist Interpretations of Physical Science (Ph.D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pierre Duhem and Neo-Thomist Interpretations of Physical Science (Ph.D Pierre Duhem and Neo-Thomist Interpretations of Physical Science (Ph.D. Thesis, 2000, Martin Hilbert, Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto) In 1879, Pope Leo XI11 demanded that Catholic philosophers and theologians adopt scholastic philosophy and especially Thomism in their studies and teaching. Although not primarily abou? science, the encyclical Aetemi Park expressed the hope that scholastic philosophy won!d be a means to understand and even to further science. The thesis examines how neo-Thomists in France and Belgium tried to understand contemporary physical science from the time of the papal mandate to the outbreak of the First World War. These geographical and temporal limits coincide with the immediate sphere of influence of Pierre Duhem (1861-1916), the well- known Catholic physicist, philosopher of science, and historian of science. After putting Aetemi Patris into historical context and focusing both on its own agenda with regard to the philosophy of science and on the challenges that it faced in a scientistic climate, the thesis identifies the major centres of neo-Thomism in the two countries and shows that Duhem was historically connected to all of them. Neo- Thomists were especially determined to re-establish hylomorphism by arguing that mechanical theories of the universe were deficient. Duhem too critiqued mechanism; but his criticism and agenda differed from that of the self-proclaimed neo-Thomists, by arguing that physical theory is not a metaphysical explanation. The thesis first examines the relation between physics and metaphysics through case studies of contemporary debates into which Duhem also entered: human freedom, creation in time, and the proof for the existence of God the Prime Mover. A more theoretical look at the relation shows both that Duhem developed some of his ideas in the philosophy of science in response to neo-Thomist criticism and that his thought in iii turn influenced some leading figures in the movement. It is argued that Jacques Maritain's Distinguer pour unir depends heavily albeit unconsciously on Duhem's work. This proves that Duhem's thought is compatible with one influential school of neo-Thomism and even contributed to its development. The thesis concludes by making the necessary distinctions to counter arguments that Duhem was hostile to the neo-Thomist enterprise on account of his Pascalian inspiration, his friendship with Maurice Blondel, and his panning of Thomas in the Sysdme du monde. Table of Abbreviations vi Acknowledgements vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Towards a Renewed Harmony of Faith and Reason in an Age of Science: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris I. Dangerous philosophies: the Magisterium as via negativa 2. The road back to Thomas 3. Aeterni Patris: the wisdom of the ages 4. T/tomism: a brief sketch 5. Aeterni Patris: into a hostile world Chapter 2 Thomism and Science: The Culture in France and Belgium in Duhem's Era I. Soci6ti scientifique de Bmelles 2. Institut supirieur de philosophie: Louvain 3. Imtitut cat/zolique de Paris 4. Soci6t6 de Saint-Thomas d'Aquin 5. Revue de pltilosopltie 6. Revue thomiste Z International Catholic Scientific Congresses 8. Pierre Duhem: at the centre of neo-T/zomist debates A ~atterof Form: Neo-Thomist and Duhemian Criticisms of Modern Physical Science I. Dullem and plzysical tkeoy: an introduction 2. Hylomorphism: an introduction 3. Hylomorphism and mechanism 4. Neo-Thomist views of dynamism and energetics k Dynamism B. Energetics 5. Hylomorphism in light of furtlter developments in physics 6. Dukem's criticim of chemical atomism and of rnec/zanisin 7. Dultem and neo-Thomists: some essential differences Chapter 4 Physics and Metaphysics: Freedom, Creation, and God 1. Human liberty and the first law of thermodynamics A Science as threat to freedom: popular arguments and preliminary notions B. First law of thermodynamics: the shackles of freedom C. Libertas ex machina D. Neo-Thomist reconciliations of physics and freedom E. Duhem on physical determinism 2. Physics and the eterniv of the world A. Creation er nihilo: a dogma of the Christian Faith B. Carbonnelle and the newly developed arguments from science C. Sertillanges and the prudence of Thomas D. Duhem: physics and the Great Year 3. Physics and the existence of God: the Prime Mover argument A. Many ways to the Creator B. The Prime Mover and inertia C. Duhem and the prima via 4. Conclusion: the independence of physics and metaphysics Chapter 5 Towards a Neo-Thomist Philosophy of Science I. Reactions to Duhem's early papers in the Revue des questions scientifiques 2. Duhern at the Congress in Brussels 3. Jean Bullioc: 'un des braves gens' 4. The Fribourg Congress: Andre' de la Barre, s.j. 5. Duhem in Louvain: a much studied pldosopher of science 6. Further inroads: the Dominicans 7. Jacques Maritairr Chapter 6 Sed Contra: Some Necessary Distinctions I. Pascalian inspirations 2. Blonde1 and modernism: sotne Duhemian observations 3. Duhem on Saint T/zomas Aquinas 4. Conclusion Appendix Pierre Duhem: A Biographical Sketch List of Archival Sources Bibliography Table of Abbreviations Aim and Structure of Pltysical Theory Annales de philosophie chritienne ArchAcSci Archives of the AcadCmie des Sciences in Pa% ArchICP Archives of the Institut catholique de Paris Archives of the Dominican library, Le Saulchoir, Paris Revue de philosophie Rwue des questions scientifiques Revue tl~omiste SiancesSSTA This is the standard title for the minutes of the meetings of the SociCtC de Saint-Thomas d'Aquin in Paris. The minutes were published in the AnnPhilChr. The standard reference to these minutes is SiancesSSTA, date, AnnPhilCllr, vol (year), PP. vii Acknowledgements Although I am gratehi to many, I will only mention those who helped directly and significantly in my research with the exception of my Oratorian confreres, who have each lightened some of my pastoral work-load, and of Jacques and Michele Vauthier, without whose generosity I would never have been able to stay in Paris for two months. I would like to thank: Trevor Levere and Sungook Hong for their direction as co-supervisors of the thesis; Stanley Jaki, for his helpful telephone conversations; Henry Donneaud and his Dominican confreres in Toulouse, for their hospitality and use of their library, and for prompt answers to questions I forgot to ask while in France; Jean-Francois Stoffel, for his thesis and bibliography on Duhem, for his transcriptions of some of Duhem's correspondence, as well as for his hospitality in Louvain-la-Neuve, insightful conversations, and his introducing me to Dominique Lambert; Charles Courtoy and especially Dorninique Lambert, both of Namur, for photocopying much valuable archival information on the Soci&ttscientifique de Bruxelles; Andrt Duval, for allowing me to photocopy Duhem's letters to Gardeil, which are in the Dominicans' library at Le Saulchoir, Paris; Philippe Ploix, the Archdiocesan Archivist in Paris, for providing me with many gems, such as the letters from Duhem to Pautonnier; Sister Abel and Jean-Baptiste Lebigue at the Institut catholique de Paris for cheerfully ferreting out archives on Bulliot, Peillaube, and others at the Institut; Pbre UAhelec, for allowing me access to the Marist archives; Francois Beretta, for sharing his surmises on the Socittt Saint Thomas d'Aquin; the archivists at the Acadtmie des Sciences in Paris; Fr Daniel Utrecht, for his proofreading; Fr Paul Pearson, for passing me notes about medieval physics; and SSHRC for four years of financial support under award number 752-95-2106. INTRODUCTION La pensee de Duhem ne mtrite pas une thbse. - Frangou Rlrrso, s.j.' In 1964, Fran~oisRusso advised Joseph O'Malley that the thought of Pierre Duhem (1861-1916) was not worth a thesis. His negative assessment, however, discouraged neither O'Malley nor a significant number of other historians and philosophers, for several major works and theses, and numerous articles, have been written in the last thirty-five years on Duhem and on various aspects of his work as physicist, philosopher of science, and historian of science. Jean-Franyois Stoffel, in his recent doctoral dissertation, has shown that most of the continuing interest in Duhem has focused on his philosophical (30%) and historical (23%) achievement and on the 'Duhem-Quine thesis' (22%). He notes that only 4% of the works have addressed Duhem as a Christian, and only 1% have made significant use of archival materials.' There is no doubt that the 'Duhem-Quine thesis' is important to claims made on behalf of the sociology of scientific knowledge, but it would be as wrong to see in Duhem a partisan of SSK as it was in the past to group him among empirical positivists. Duhem's holism is a much more nuanced position that may require a class of its own. Nevertheless, scholars have attempted to capture his thought in one of the better known categories." Stanley Jaki, for example, has said that 'while From a letter, posted in December 1964, from Russo to Joseph O'Malley who at the time was witing a thesis on 'Material Being and Scientific Knowledge According to Pierre Duhem'. See Stanley Jaki, Reluctanr Heroine: nte Life and Work of Hi12ne Duhern (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1992), p. 264. Jaki notes that the words were underlined for emphasis. Jean-Fransois Stoffel, 'Entre projet scientifique et projet apologClique, le phtnomdnalisme probltmatique de Pierre Duhem' (Ph. D. dissertation, 1998, FacultC des sciences philosophiques: lnstitut superieur de philosophie: Universite
Recommended publications
  • The Philosophy of Physics
    The Philosophy of Physics ROBERTO TORRETTI University of Chile PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014, Madrid, Spain © Roberto Torretti 1999 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1999 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Sabon 10.25/13 pt. System QuarkXPress [BTS] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. 0 521 56259 7 hardback 0 521 56571 5 paperback Contents Preface xiii 1 The Transformation of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century 1 1.1 Mathematics and Experiment 2 1.2 Aristotelian Principles 8 1.3 Modern Matter 13 1.4 Galileo on Motion 20 1.5 Modeling and Measuring 30 1.5.1 Huygens and the Laws of Collision 30 1.5.2 Leibniz and the Conservation of “Force” 33 1.5.3 Rømer and the Speed of Light 36 2 Newton 41 2.1 Mass and Force 42 2.2 Space and Time 50 2.3 Universal Gravitation 57 2.4 Rules of Philosophy 69 2.5 Newtonian Science 75 2.5.1 The Cause of Gravity 75 2.5.2 Central Forces 80 2.5.3 Analytical
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Problem of Life's Definition the Philosophical Literature Is Positively
    Chapter 1. The Problem of Life's Definition The 'mystery' of consciousness today is in roughly the same shape that the mystery of life was before the development of molecular biology or the mystery of electromagnetism was before Clerk-Maxwell's equations. It seems mysterious because we do not know how the system of neuro-physiology/ consciousness works, and an adequate knowledge of how it works would remove the mystery. (Searle 1992, 101-2) The philosophical literature is positively rife1 with claims similar to those made in the epigraph, claims to the effect that the nature of life no longer presents interesting philosophical questions. The field of Artificial Life — a field which bears essentially the relationship to biology that Artificial Intelligence research bears to psychology2 — is currently bringing the nature of life and 1 In addition to Searle's comment, see Searle (1997, 201), Cornman (1992, 5), Crane (1995, 4-5), McGinn (1991, 6, 8, & 45), & Chalmers (1996, 25). The view is commonplace in science as well. Boyce Resenberg says, "life is just so much chemistry and physics", and he quotes biologist Harold Erikson as saying, "The secret of life is not a secret anymore. We have known for twenty or thirty years now that life is not more mysterious than the chemical reactions on which it is based." Cell biologist Tom Pollard is quoted as saying (what may be something quite different) that "What molecular biologists have believed for two generations is now generally regarded as proved beyond any doubt. Life is entirely the result of physics and chemistry inside cells and among cells" (Rensberger 1996, 25.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium
    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
    [Show full text]
  • French and German Cultural Cooperation, 1925-1954 Elana
    The Cultivation of Friendship: French and German Cultural Cooperation, 1925-1954 Elana Passman A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Dr. Donald M. Reid Dr. Christopher R. Browning Dr. Konrad H. Jarausch Dr. Alice Kaplan Dr. Lloyd Kramer Dr. Jay M. Smith ©2008 Elana Passman ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ELANA PASSMAN The Cultivation of Friendship: French and German Cultural Cooperation, 1925-1954 (under the direction of Donald M. Reid) Through a series of case studies of French-German friendship societies, this dissertation investigates the ways in which activists in France and Germany battled the dominant strains of nationalism to overcome their traditional antagonism. It asks how the Germans and the French recast their relationship as “hereditary enemies” to enable them to become partners at the heart of today’s Europe. Looking to the transformative power of civic activism, it examines how journalists, intellectuals, students, industrialists, and priests developed associations and lobbying groups to reconfigure the French-German dynamic through cultural exchanges, bilingual or binational journals, conferences, lectures, exhibits, and charitable ventures. As a study of transnational cultural relations, this dissertation focuses on individual mediators along with the networks and institutions they developed; it also explores the history of the idea of cooperation. Attempts at rapprochement in the interwar period proved remarkably resilient in the face of the prevalent nationalist spirit. While failing to override hostilities and sustain peace, the campaign for cooperation adopted a new face in the misguided shape of collaborationism during the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Dualism and Immanentism Sacramental Ontology and History
    religions Article Between Dualism and Immanentism Sacramental Ontology and History Enrico Beltramini Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Notre Dame de Namur University, Belmont, CA 94002, USA; [email protected] Abstract: How to deal with religious ideas in religious history (and in history in general) has recently become a matter of discussion. In particular, a number of authors have framed their work around the concept of ‘sacramental ontology,’ that is, a unified vision of reality in which the secular and the religious come together, although maintaining their distinction. The authors’ choices have been criticized by their fellow colleagues as a form of apologetics and a return to integralism. The aim of this article is to provide a proper context in which to locate the phenomenon of sacramental ontology. I suggest considering (1) the generation of the concept of sacramental ontology as part of the internal dialectic of the Christian intellectual world, not as a reaction to the secular; and (2) the adoption of the concept as a protection against ontological nihilism, not as an attack on scientific knowledge. Keywords: sacramental ontology; history; dualism; immanentism; nihilism Citation: Beltramini, Enrico. 2021. Between Dualism and Immanentism Sacramental Ontology and History. Religions 12: 47. https://doi.org/ 1. Introduction 10.3390rel12010047 A specter is haunting the historical enterprise, the specter of ‘sacramental ontology.’ Received: 3 December 2020 The specter of sacramental ontology is carried by a generation of Roman Catholic and Accepted: 23 December 2020 Evangelical historians as well as historical theologians who aim to restore the sacred dimen- 1 Published: 11 January 2021 sion of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Values in Duhem's Philosophy of Science
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of San Francisco The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences 2011 The cS ientist as Impartial Judge: Moral Values in Duhem’s Philosophy of Science David J. Stump University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/phil Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Stump, David J., "The cS ientist as Impartial Judge: Moral Values in Duhem’s Philosophy of Science" (2011). Philosophy. Paper 13. http://repository.usfca.edu/phil/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Scientist as Impartial Judge: Moral Values in Duhem’s Philosophy of Science (Part of a book symposium New Perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s Aim and Structure of Scientific Theory in Metascience (2011) 20(1): 1-25) David J. Stump Department of Philosophy University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 [email protected] Rereading Duhem’s classic work in the philosophy of science is a true pleasure that I highly recommend. There is of course more in Duhem’s work than can possibly be covered in a short review, so I will focus on his famous epistemological claims and the solution that Duhem proposes to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pre-History of Subsidiarity in Leo XIII
    Journal of Catholic Legal Studies Volume 56 Number 1 Article 5 The Pre-History of Subsidiarity in Leo XIII Michael P. Moreland Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcls This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Catholic Legal Studies by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FINAL_MORELAND 8/14/2018 9:10 PM THE PRE-HISTORY OF SUBSIDIARITY IN LEO XIII MICHAEL P. MORELAND† Christian Legal Thought is a much-anticipated contribution from Patrick Brennan and William Brewbaker that brings the resources of the Christian intellectual tradition to bear on law and legal education. Among its many strengths, the book deftly combines Catholic and Protestant contributions and scholarly material with more widely accessible sources such as sermons and newspaper columns. But no project aiming at a crisp and manageably-sized presentation of Christianity’s contribution to law could hope to offer a comprehensive treatment of particular themes. And so, in this brief essay, I seek to elaborate upon the treatment of the principle of subsidiarity in Catholic social thought. Subsidiarity is mentioned a handful of times in Christian Legal Thought, most squarely with a lengthy quotation from Pius XI’s articulation of the principle in Quadragesimo Anno.1 In this proposed elaboration of subsidiarity, I wish to broaden the discussion of subsidiarity historically (back a few decades from Quadragesimo Anno to the pontificate of Leo XIII) and philosophically (most especially its relation to Leo XIII’s revival of Thomism).2 Statements of the principle have historically been terse and straightforward even if the application of subsidiarity to particular legal questions has not.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Intellectual Tradition Scholarship, Faith, and Higher Education
    ISSN 1941-8450 Journal of Religion & Society Supplement Series The Kripke Center Supplement 6 (2011) The Catholic Intellectual Tradition Scholarship, Faith, and Higher Education Edited by John J. O’Keefe, Gina Merys, and Bridget Keegan The Catholic Intellectual Tradition Medieval Lessons Frederick Christian Bauerschmidt, Loyola University Maryland Introduction [1] Whatever else a tradition is, it is something that connects us to a past, and not simply to a past fondly remembered, but one that continues to inform our present. So it seems not implausible that we might look to the past in order to gain insight into what it means to be engaged in the Catholic Intellectual Tradition today. And because Catholicism seems, for good or for ill, to have a particular connection to the Middle Ages – the “Age of Faith” – we might look to that particular past to see what lessons we can learn about what we mean when we speak of a Catholic Intellectual Tradition, about what challenges are posed to and posed by this tradition, and about how we foster and further this tradition. I will proceed by first making and exploring a distinction, and then proposing some points for consideration. 10 The Catholic Intellectual Tradition [2] Medieval scholastic thought proceeded largely by the making of distinctions, and thus it would warm the heart of our scholastic forbears if we begin with a distinction. I suggest we might distinguish between what we mean materially by the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, and what we mean formally. In other words, when we speak “materially” about the Catholic Intellectual Tradition, we mean those texts, works of art, figures, concepts, and so forth that are indispensable in preservation, transmission, and extension of that tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity Thesis in World System History - B
    WORLD SYSTEM HISTORY – One World System or Many: Continuity Thesis in World System History - B. K. Gills and R. A. Denemark ONE WORLD SYSTEM OR MANY: THE CONTINUITY THESIS IN WORLD SYSTEM HISTORY B. K. Gills School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK R. A. Denemark Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Delaware, USA Keywords: continuity, historical materialism, center-periphery-hinterland complex, hegemony, super-hegemony, oikos, humanocentrism. Contents 1. Continuity in World History 2. Historical Materialism 3. Economic Cycles 4. Core-Periphery Hierarchies 5. Hegemony and Super-Hegemony 6. Continuity Thesis and Historical Dialectics 6.1. Capital versus Oikos 6.2. Unfree Labor versus Free Commodified Labor 6.3. Organization versus Entropy 7. Humanocentrism Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary The continuity thesis in world system history expresses the idea of long-term historical continuity in contrast to the idea of perpetual change and progression through a series of epoch-alteringUNESCO transformations. This perspective – hasEOLSS important conceptual roots in non- western philosophical traditions. Drawing much inspiration from historical materialism, the continuity thesis nonetheless problematizes any hypothesized transition to capitalism. There are vital processes that remain unchanged across the period of the alleged transition,SAMPLE and the model itself is (poor CHAPTERSly) drawn from the experience of a single world region. Important characteristics of the thesis include concern for economic cycles, the development of core-periphery-hinterland complexes, hegemony and super- hegemony, a set of three dialectical tensions including capital versus oikos, unfree labor versus free commodified labor, and organization versus entropy. In contradistinction to the profoundly Eurocentric nature of much contemporary social thought, the continuity thesis is humanocentric.
    [Show full text]
  • León XIII Y Los Terciarios Franciscanos: Una Condena Del Pauperismo En Los Inicios Del Catolicismo Social
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE ARTÍCULOSprovided by EPrints Complutense Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought ISSN-e: 2386-5768 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/IJHE.60280 León XIII y los terciarios franciscanos: una condena del pauperismo en los inicios del catolicismo social Begoña Pérez Calle1; José Luis Malo Guillén2 Recibido: 07 de febrero de 2017 / Aceptado: 01 de junio de 2018 Resumen. Ya desde los inicios de la revolución industrial, el pauperismo en que derivó un alto porcentaje de las clases trabajadoras llamaría la atención de la Iglesia y generaría distintos discursos. Las vertientes fueron variadas, desde el corte caritativo al solidario, desde el intervencionista Iglesia-Estado al de pura conciencia. De una manera u otra, los debates generados se enmarcarían en una época presidida por un problema: la cuestión obrera, de la cual se estaban ocupando por otra parte las teorías socialistas que adquirían cada vez más protagonismo en la ideología de las clases trabajadoras. En el último tercio del siglo XIX, el Papa León XIII hizo una puesta de largo de esa preocupación vaticana por el estado GHSREUH]DHQTXHODLQGXVWULDOL]DFLyQKDEtDGHMDGRDDPSOLRVVHFWRUHVGHODSREODFLyQ(VWHDUWtFXORLGHQWL¿FDHOIRQGR de esa cuestión con una deriva del pensamiento franciscano que nunca abandonó al sacerdote y miembro de la Orden Tercera Gioacchino Pecci. Palabras clave: Catolicismo social; franciscanismo; pauperismo; cuestión obrera; mercado ético. &ODVL¿FDFLyQ-(/ B19, N43, Z12. [en] Leon XIII and the Franciscan tertiary: a condemnation of pauperism at the dawn of social Catholicism Abstract. From the beginning of the industrial revolution, the pauperism in which a high percentage of the working FODVVHVGHULYHGDWWUDFWHGWKHDWWHQWLRQRIWKH&KXUFKDQGJHQHUDWHGGLIIHUHQWGLVFRXUVHV:HFDQ¿QGYDULHGGLPHQVLRQV from charitable to solidary, from the Church-State interventionist to pure conscience.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint John Henry Newman, Development of Doctrine, and Sensus Fidelium: His Enduring Legacy in Roman Catholic Theological Discourse
    Journal of Moral Theology, Vol. 10, No. 2 (2021): 60–89 Saint John Henry Newman, Development of Doctrine, and Sensus Fidelium: His Enduring Legacy in Roman Catholic Theological Discourse Kenneth Parker The whole Church, laity and hierarchy together, bears responsi- bility for and mediates in history the revelation which is contained in the holy Scriptures and in the living apostolic Tradition … [A]ll believers [play a vital role] in the articulation and development of the faith …. “Sensus fidei in the life of the Church,” 3.1, 67 International Theological Commission of the Catholic Church Rome, July 2014 N 2014, THE INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL Commission pub- lished “Sensus fidei in the life of the Church,” which highlighted two critically important theological concepts: development and I sensus fidelium. Drawing inspiration directly from the works of John Henry Newman, this document not only affirmed the insights found in his Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (1845), which church authorities embraced during the first decade of New- man’s life as a Catholic, but also his provocative Rambler article, “On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine” (1859), which resulted in episcopal accusations of heresy and Newman’s delation to Rome. The tension between Newman’s theory of development and his appeal for the hierarchy to consider the experience of the “faithful” ultimately centers on the “seat” of authority, and whose voices matter. As a his- torical theologian, I recognize in the 175 year reception of Newman’s theory of development, the controversial character of this historio- graphical assumption—or “metanarrative”—which privileges the hi- erarchy’s authority to teach, but paradoxically acknowledges the ca- pacity of the “faithful” to receive—and at times reject—propositions presented to them as authoritative truth claims.1 1 Maurice Blondel, in his History and Dogma (1904), emphasized that historians always act on metaphysical assumptions when applying facts to the historical St.
    [Show full text]
  • Philipp Frank at Harvard University: His Work and His Influence
    Philipp Frank at Harvard University: His Work and His Influence The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Holton, Gerald. 2006. Phillip Frank at Harvard: His Work and his Influence. Synthese 153 (2): 297-311. doi.org/10.1007/ s11229-005-5471-3 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37837879 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA 10/12/04 Lecture at Philipp Frank Conferences in Prague & Vienna, Sept-Oct. ‘04 Philipp Frank at Harvard: His Work and his Influence by Gerald Holton My pleasant task today is to bring to life Philipp Frank’s work and influence during his last three decades, when he found a refuge and a position in America. In what follows, I hope I may call him Philipp--having been first a graduate student in one of his courses at Harvard, then his teaching assistant sharing his offices, then for many years his colleague and friend in the same Physics Department, and finally, doing research on his archival holdings kept at Harvard. I also should not hide my large personal debt to him, for without his recommendation in the 1950s to the Albert Einstein Estate, I would not have received its warm welcome and its permission, as the first one to do historical research in the treasure trove of unpublished letters and manuscripts, thus starting me on a major part of my career in the history of science.
    [Show full text]