Global and Regional Trends
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Think Tanks & Civil Societies Program
Think Tanks & Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute The University of Pennsylvania “Helping to bridge the gap between knowledge and policy” Researching the trends and challenges facing think tanks, policymakers, and policy-oriented civil society groups... Sustaining, strengthening, and building capacity for think tanks around the world... Maintaining the largest, most comprehensive database of over 8,000 think tanks... All requests, questions, and comments should be directed to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania 2019 EUROPE THINK TANKS SUMMIT PARTICIPANT BIOS AGÜERO, María Elena Secretary General World Leadership Alliance-Club de Madrid Madrid, Spain María Elena Agüero is the current Club de Madrid's Secretary General. With over 30 years experience in the field of international development, particularly in Latin America, she has been part of the professional staff of the Inter-American Development Bank, the World Bank and the United Nations Development Program, working extensively in these organization's Washington, Uruguay, Geneva, Brussels and Paris offices, and in their field offices. As project officer, sector specialist and senior adviser, in these organizations, she has done considerable project and programme work in a number of different areas, most recently in the fields of governance, State reform and civil society – governmental relations. She has also gathered significant experience on relations between international organizations, governmental and non- governmental organizations, national and international partners and counterparts. Early in her career Ms. Agüero was trade policy officer at the U.S. Department of Treasury and research assistant at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. -
For a European Policy on Asylum, Migration and Mobility
#MIGRATIONS #ASYLUM FOR A EUROPEAN POLICY ON ASYLUM, MIGRATION AND MOBILITY JÉRÔME VIGNON ADVISER, JACQUES DELORS INSTITUTE JÉRÔME VIGNON TABLE OF CONTENTS Jérôme Vignon is adviser at the Jacques Delors Institute. He graduated from the École polytechnique Executive summary 4 and the École nationale de la statistique et de l’administration économique. Foreword 6 He spent the first part of his professional life in various public services (Regional Mission of the Pays de Loire, INSEE Program Department, Commissariat du Plan), before returning to Jacques Delors’ cabinet Introduction 7 in 1981, in charge of macroeconomic issues and the economic situation. 1. What do Europeans really think He accompanies Jacques Delors in Brussels, which led him to create and lead the Forward Studies Unit about foreigners and migration flows? 10 of the European Commission until 1998. After two years at DATAR as Director of Strategy, he returned to the European Commission where he was successively in charge of a white paper on European gover- 2. The incomplete bases of a common European policy nance, then director of protection and social integration in the DG of Social Affairs. on asylum and immigration 15 Since 2011 he chairs the National Observatory of Poverty and Social Exclusion (ONPES). In 2015, 3. Assessing the present and future migration challenge 21 Bernard Cazeneuve entrusted him, with the prefect Jean Aribaud, with a mission to find outlets for the situation of migrants in Calais. 4. Providing the Common European Asylum System with the resources commensurate with its initial aims 27 As an associate member, Jérôme Vignon is also a member of the Board of Directors of several social organizations: the Habitat et Humanisme Foundation, the Jean Rhodain Foundation and the Semaines 5. -
Ein Summer University Bucharest
EIN SUMMER UNIVERSITY A Centre Right Answer to the Economic and Social Crisis : a Project for Europe 22 - 24 September 2011 BUCHAREST VADEMECUM of the Speakers Service Documentation - Publications Recherche EPP Group Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) in the European Parliament EN European Ideas Network 2 Vademecum of the speakers Vademecum of the speakers European Ideas Network 3 European Ideas Network 4 Vademecum of the speakers Roberta Alma ANASTASE Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies On December 19th, 2008, Roberta Anastase was elected Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies. She is the first woman to hold the office in the history of Romania. Prior to being elected, Ms. Anastase was a Member of Parliament, representing her home county of Prahova in the Chamber of Deputies. From 2005 to 2008, she was an observer, and then a Member of the European Parliament, affiliated with the European People’s Party – European Democrats Group. In November of 2008, under a new voting system, she was reelected as the first representative of the 11th electoral district of Prahova (Ploiesti-Vest) to the Chamber of Deputies. Ms. Anastase was born in Ploieşti on March 27th, 1976. A sociologist by training, she pursued post-graduate studies in Political Science and European Studies. Throughout her time as an MP and an MEP, Ms. Anastase has supported justice reform, women’s rights and equal opportunities. She was also European Parliament Rapporteur for the Black Sea Synergy and maintains a keen interest in foreign and regional affairs. Bogdan Lucian AURESCU A career diplomat, Bogdan Aurescu was appointed Secretary of State for Strategic Affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 4 February 2009. -
EU Think Tanks' Lobbying Strategies
EU Think Tanks’ Lobbying Strategies - Think Tanks’ Strategic Choices to Influence Public Policy - Héloïse Robino s1518941 Master Thesis MSc Public Administration, Leiden University Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs Supervisor: Dr. Bert Fraussen 2nd Reader: Dr. Valérie Pattyn The Hague, 11th of June 2018 EU Think Tanks’ Lobbying Strategies Héloïse Robino TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 TOPIC DEFINITION AND RESEARCH QUESTION 3 1.2 ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL RELEVANCE 4 1.3 OUTLINE OF THE THESIS 6 2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 7 2.1 INTRODUCTION 7 2.2 INSIDE STRATEGIES 8 2.3 OUTSIDE STRATEGIES 10 2.4 INTEREST GROUPS AND THEIR CHOICE OF STRATEGY 12 2.5 INTEREST GROUPS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 13 TABLE 1: EU TRANSPARENCY REGISTER ORGANIZATIONS, 2018 15 2.6 THINK TANKS AT THE EU-LEVEL 15 2.7 THINK TANKS AS A TYPE OF INTEREST GROUP: INSIDE AND OUTSIDE STRATEGIES 16 FIGURE 1: OVERVIEW OF ASSUMPTIONS 20 2.8 CONCLUSION 20 3. RESEARCH DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTION 21 3.1 INTRODUCTION 21 3.2 SELECTED THINK TANKS 21 TABLE 2: LIST OF BRUSSELS-BASED EU THINK TANKS 24 3.3 DEPENDENT VARIABLES 25 3.4 INSIDE STRATEGY INDICATOR 25 TABLE 3: INSIDE STRATEGIES INDICATOR 26 3.5 OUTSIDE STRATEGY INDICATOR 27 TABLE 4: OUTSIDE STRATEGIES INDICATOR 27 3.6 INDEPENDENT VARIABLES 28 TABLE 5: POSSIBLE DETERMINANTS OF STRATEGY 28 TABLE 6: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES 31 TABLE 7: DISTRIBUTION OF CATEGORICAL VARIABLES 31 4. ANALYSIS 32 4.1 INTRODUCTION 32 4.2 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS 32 FIGURE 2: INSIDE STRATEGY DISTRIBUTION 33 FIGURE 3: OUTSIDE STRATEGY DISTRIBUTION -
Yes, We Should! Eu Priorities for 2019-2024 How to Do It
APRIL 2019 ISSUE 24 CHALLENGE EUROPE Yes, we should! EU priorities for 2019-2024 Dimitar Bechev Srdjan Majstorović Larissa Brunner Julia Okatz Paul Butcher George Pagoulatos Christian Calliess Gunter Pauli Poul Skytte Christoffersen Marta Pilati Marie De Somer Martin Porter Claire Dhéret Janez Potočnik Andrew Duff Julian Rappold Janis A. Emmanouilidis Jamie Shea Giovanni Grevi Corina Stratulat Annika Hedberg Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi Stefan Heumann Herman Van Rompuy Paul Ivan Fabian Zuleeg Marko Kmezić YES Lab EDITING Rebecca Castermans GRAPHIC DESIGN Mariusz Dabek mgraphicdesign.eu PHOTOGRAPHY AFP Forum Cover photo: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com LEGAL DEPOSIT ISSN-1783-2462 This publication is available free of charge on www.epc.eu The support the European Policy Centre receives for its ongoing operations, or specifically for its publications, does not constitute an endorsement of their contents, which reflect the views of the authors only. Supporters and partners cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. CHALLENGE EUROPE Yes, we should! EU priorities for 2019-2024 Dimitar Bechev Srdjan Majstorović Larissa Brunner Julia Okatz Paul Butcher George Pagoulatos Christian Calliess Gunter Pauli Poul Skytte Christoffersen Marta Pilati Marie De Somer Martin Porter Claire Dhéret Janez Potočnik Andrew Duff Julian Rappold Janis A. Emmanouilidis Jamie Shea Giovanni Grevi Corina Stratulat Annika Hedberg Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi Stefan Heumann Herman Van Rompuy Paul Ivan Fabian Zuleeg Marko Kmezić YES Lab EUROPEAN POLICY CENTRE TABLE OF CONTENTS About Challenge Europe 4 Foreword by Herman Van Rompuy 5 1. Yes, we should! Rebecca Castermans, Janis A. Emmanouilidis, Johannes Greubel, Giovanni Grevi and Corina Stratulat 9 WHAT TO DO PART I Sustainable prosperity 2. -
THINK TANK REVIEW NOVEMBER 2020 Council Library ISSUE 83
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Council of the European Union General Secretariat THINK TANK REVIEW NOVEMBER 2020 Council Library ISSUE 83 This Think Tank Review* covers articles and reports published in October relating to different political and policy topics (twitter link). Covid-19 reports analyse the various methods and policies the EU is using to finance and promote economic recovery, explaining: that the recovery fund will lead the way out of the crisis and will set the course shaping European integration, with the European Parliament being more closely involved in the deployment of the fund; recovery spending is a high-stakes challenge and could be derailed by fuzzy objectives or overloaded procedures; if grants and loans in the next generation fund are well targeted, growth and confidence could be boosted in the future; the impact of the ECB's monetary policies in stopping the pandemic from infecting European sovereign debt markets; a possible Europeanisation of health policy and the newly proposed EU4Health programme, as well as the role of teleworking in bolstering economic activity; and that the EU is increasingly caught in international crossfire as Covid-19 intensifies global economic competition, in particular the rivalry between the US and China. EU INSTITUTIONS AND POLICY AREAS Jean-Claude Juncker shares his views on different issues, for instance how we can create an "affectio societatis", a feeling of belonging to this Union; if Europe should assert itself more on the world stage; how the member states can move forward on the sensitive issue of European defence; and if it is preferable to seek consensus at all costs. -
The European Green Deal
BRIEFING What Think Tanks are Thinking 9 March 2020 The European Green Deal The European Green Deal is a key policy plank of the new European Commission led by President Ursula von der Leyen. It is a package of measures that aims to radically cut emissions of greenhouse gases while creating jobs in clean industries. Its main objectives are for the EU to become climate neutral by 2050, radically reduce other types of pollution, help European companies to become world leaders in green products, and offer aid to regions affected by this economic transition. This note offers links to recent commentaries, studies and reports from international think tanks on the Green Deal and climate issues. More studies on the topics can be found in a previous item from these series, published in early December 2019. Europe’s Green Deal must reach beyond its borders Bruegel, February 2020 Digging the trenches: The EU and the Green Deal European Council on Foreign Relations, February 2020 Five things to look for in the Green New Deal World Resources Institute, February 2020 The EU Green Deal can go global, but ‘climate diplomacy’ won’t be easy Friends of Europe, February 2020 The European Green Deal: Winning the climate change Centre international de formation européenne, February 2020 Berlin will make or break the European Green Deal Bruegel, February 2020 There is no Green Deal without a just transition Istituto Affari Internazionali, February 2020 Low carbon energy transition as a driver and solution to energy poverty and injustice Centre international -
Brussels the EU Quarter
editionnew lobby planet lobby planet lobby planet This guide, focused on the EU quarter, provides an insight into the power politics at play in the European Union. Corporate offices, lobby consultancies, think tanks, PR firms and industry lobby groups line the streets, all with a brief and a budget to influence the bureaucrats and politicians responsible for decision making in the EU. Brussels Complete with maps and clear directions, this new updated full The EU quarter colour edition of the Lobby Planet, provides you with the tools to discover the hidden secrets of the EU. Take the carbon tour and seek out the offices of the climate Brussels lobbyists, intent on undermining climate legislation in Europe. The quarter EU Follow the finance tour and find the lobby groups which obstruct effective regulations in Europe’s financial markets. Or find the agribusiness lobbyists, pressurising the EU to authorise genetically modified crops, or the food and drink lobbyists, anxious to block regulations for the food we eat. Corporate Europe Observatory Rue d’Edimbourg 26 - 1050 Brussels - Belgium www.corporateeurope.org ISBN 978-94-6190-252-8 9 789461 902528 This guide This concise guide introduces you to the hidden world of corporate lobbying in Brussels. First produced in 2004, the fully revised and updated version provides an overview of lobbying in Brussels as well as specific tours highlighting the lobbying powers in different sectors – finance, carbon and agribusiness. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making. -
EU Member States and Enlargement Towards the Balkans
EU member states and enlargement towards the Balkans EPC ISSUE PAPER NO. 79 J u l y 2 0 1 5 Edited by Rosa Balfour and Corina Stratulat EUROPEAN POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONS ISSN 1782-494X PROGRAMME The EPC’s Programme on European Politics and Institutions With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the new focus of this programme is on adapting the EU’s institutional architecture to take account of the changed set-up and on bringing the EU closer to its citizens. Continuing discussion on governance and policymaking in Brussels is essential to ensure that the European project can move forward and respond to the challenges facing the Union in the 21st century in a democratic and effective manner. This debate is closely linked to the key questions of how to involve European citizens in the discussions over its future; how to win their support for European integration and what are the prospects for, and consequences of, further enlargement towards the Balkans and Turkey. This programme focuses on these core themes and brings together all the strands of the debate on a number of key issues, addressing them through various fora, task forces and projects. It also works with other programmes on cross-cutting issues such as the reform of European economic governance or the new EU foreign policy structures. ii Table of Contents About the authors .................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ -
2 State of Play : an Overview of Europe-Focused Think Tanks in the E.U
2 State of play : an overview of Europe-focused think tanks in the E.U. and E.U. Member States This section summarises the information collected – presented in detail on Notre Europe’s website - first through an overview of the E.U. situation (2.1), then by looking at the situation in individual E.U. Member States (2.2) and what is specific about the ten new Member States (2.3). We finally draw a few preliminary conclusions (2.4). 2.1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATIONSITUATION IN THE EU The analysis provided in this section is based on the population of think tanks selected for this report. It is therefore a snapshot view, based on our own, somewhat subjective criteria. The Case Study on the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung illustrates how the reality of think tanks that deal with European policy matters is not straightforward. Although we acknowledge the limitations of such an exercise and that it is probably impossible to achieve totally uniform collection and presentation of data, we also believe that the categories and trends identified here will be of use to readers. 2.1.1 KEY FACTS Our survey population of EU-focused think tanks in the 25 member states and in Brussels is presented in full on Notre Europe’s website. We have looked at 149 think tanks in the E.U. currently working on European issues. A quarter (36) are ‘Euro-specific’, the remaining 113 ‘Euro-oriented’ think tanks, as we call them, work on other issues besides Europe. Table 2 below presents an overview of our findings. -
Solidarity in the EU: More Hype Than Substance? Sophie Pornschlegel
ISSUE PAPER 28 JULY 2021 Solidarity in the EU: More hype than substance? Sophie Pornschlegel Credit: PIXABAY Table of contents List of abbreviations 4 Executive summary 5 Introduction 6 EU solidarity beyond the COVID-19 crisis 6 Conceptual approach 7 Outline 7 Chapter 1: What is solidarity? 8 1. A multifaceted concept 8 2. National solidarity as first-order solidarity 8 3. EU solidarity as second-order solidarity 11 3.1. Interstate solidarity: Reciprocity and enlightened self-interest 12 3.2. Interpersonal solidarity: A limited concept in the EU 12 Chapter 2: The state of play of solidarity in the EU 15 1. Current approach towards EU solidarity 15 2. The forms and dimensions of EU solidarity 15 2.1. Institutionalised solidarity 16 2.2. Ad hoc solidarity in crisis moments 17 3. Public attitudes towards solidarity 18 Chapter 3: EU solidarity in the COVID-19 crisis 20 1. Solidarity mechanisms in the COVID-19 crisis 20 2. The limits of the COVID-19 solidarity mechanisms 21 Chapter 4: Four policy recommendations to foster solidarity in the EU 23 Conclusion 28 Endnotes 29 About the author Sophie Pornschlegel is a 2020/2021 Fellow of the Charlemagne Prize Academy, where she researches how the EU could foster solidarity after the COVID-19 crisis. She is also a Senior Policy Analyst at the European Policy Centre (EPC), where she works on democracy, the rule of law and civil society issues. She also leads the Connecting Europe programme, a joint initiative between the EPC and Stiftung Mercator to connect civil society with EU decision-makers.