Personae, Same-Sex Desire, and Salvation in the Poetry of Marbod of Rennes, Baudri of Bourgueil, and Hildebert of Lavardin
PERSONAE, SAME-SEX DESIRE, AND SALVATION IN THE POETRY OF MARBOD OF RENNES, BAUDRI OF BOURGUEIL, AND HILDEBERT OF LAVARDIN by Tison Pugh “Luxuriae vitio castissimus en ego fio, Quod duros mollit, hoc molitiem mihi tollit.” Marbod of Rennes (“Lo, I am made completely chaste by the sin of lechery. / [The vice] which makes hard men soft takes away my softness.”) In the Christian milieu of the western European medieval world, poets adopted a wide-range of stances—from the laudatory to the condem- natory—towards same-sex relations.1 Some monastic writers, however, appear to conflate the two oppositional views, both praising male beauty in highly eroticized terms and damning men who fall to the pleasures of homoerotic desire. How is one to understand this apparent contradiction in which the right hand of the poet seems to praise what the left hand proscribes, in which the writer anathematizes what appear to be his own sexual predilections?2 In this paper, I examine the para- dox of holy men expressing unholy desire in reference to three Franco- Latin writers of the early twelfth century: Marbod of Rennes, Baudri of Bourgueil, and Hildebert of Lavardin. Playing at the boundaries be- tween licit and illicit identities, these men speak taboo desire by creat- ing a safe space for themselves through the alternative performances of sinful and of saved personae. The performance of same-sex desire 1A note on vocabulary: I refrain from using terms—including gay, homosexual, and queer—which some scholars consider anachronistic in a study of medieval sexuality. Instead, I employ a lexicon including same-sex and homoerotic, which I consider to be descriptive of the behaviors in question, though not presumptive of modern ideas about identity.
[Show full text]