Triangle All Theorems Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Triangle All Theorems Pdf Triangle all theorems pdf Continue Download the GeoGebra Interactive display of some angular definitions. Change the slider to see the appropriate angles and alternative angles. The angle of one revolution is 360 degrees. The two corners separating the common beam are called adjacent. Two adjacent corners along the line are called additional angles. If the two extra corners are equal, they have the right angles. An angle that is smaller than one straight angle is a sharp angle. A corner that has more than one straight angle and less than two correct angles of a blunt angle. The line that crosses the other two lines is called transverse. The corners are the appropriate angles. Corners are alternative angles. The corners are vertical angles. The angle is the outer corner of the triangle. Note: Number 1 has been added to the list, even though the degrees are not mentioned in euclid Elements. GeoGebra tasks Make a line through points A and B, and line B through points C and D. Enter the E crossing point and the α angle. Place point F on line B. Task 1 Make the angle β point F equals α, and so that β becomes an alternate angle when the new line is drawn. What can you say about the line A and the new line? Task 2 Make the angle β point F equal to α, and such β becomes an appropriate angle when drawing a new line. What can you say about the line A and the new line? Theorem theorem 1 Vertical angles are equal. Theorem 2 In any triangle, the sum of two inner corners is less than two at right angles. Theorem 3 If the two lines intersect, and if the alternative angles are equal, the two lines are parallel. Theorem 4 If two parallel lines intersect, then the alternative angles are equal. Theorem 5 If the two lines intersect, and if the corresponding angles are equal, the two lines are parallel. Theorem 6 If two parallel lines intersect, the corresponding angles are equal. Theorem 7 - Theorem of the outer corner of the outer corner of the triangle is equal to the sum of two remote inner corners. Theorem 8 Sum the inner corners of the triangle two right corners. Theorem 9 Reverse triangle theorem is isozel If the two corners in the triangle are equal, the triangle isocele. The exercises of the theorems you should know before doing this are: congruence cases of SAS, SSS, ASA, and theorem about the corners in the triangle of isoceles. Exercise 1 Prove theorema 1 Exercise 2 In the demonstration below, D is the middle point of the AC segment as well as the midpoint of the BE segment. As long as the triangle ticles have a counterclockwise order A, B, C; the amount of money α γ less than two right angles. Show γ β. Then prove theoreum 2. You can use theorems that have already been proven. Download the GeoGebra Demo sum of two angles in a triangle. Exercise 3 Prove theoreum 3. Try to make the evidence a contradiction, i.e. to assume that your proposal is not true; then show that this assumption leads to contradiction. Then use theorem 3 to prove theorem 4, proof of contradictions works in this case as well. Exercise 4 Using some theorem is proven so far to prove theorems 5 and 6. Exercise 5 Prove theorem 7 - Theorem of the outer corner. Use the picture below. Line L parallel AC. Exercise 6 Prove theoreum 8. Exercise 7 Prove theoreum 9! Hint: draw a corner of bisectris on one of the triangle vertices. Triangle theorems are mostly stated based on their angles and sides. Triangles are polygons that have three sides and three angles. Now, if we look at the sides of the triangle, we should observe the length of the sides if they are equal to each other or not. If there are no equal sides, it is a large-scale triangle. If there are two sides equal to a triangle, it is a triangle of isoseles. If all sides are equal in length, these triangles are called an equilateral triangle. Now, if you look at triangles based on interior corners, they are again classified into three types. If all angles are less than 90 degrees, the triangle is called a sharp angular triangle. If one of the corners is 90 degrees, the triangle is known as the right triangle. If the measure of any of the angles is more than 90 degrees, then it is said to be a blunt angle of the triangle. Since we've understood the different types of triangles, let's look at theorems based on triangles here. List the triangle theorem Although there are many theorems based on triangles, let's see here some basic but important ones. Theorem 1: The sum of all three inner corners of the triangle is 180 degrees. Suppose the ABC triangle is then in line with this theorem; ∠A ∠B and ∠C 180 Theorem 2: The base corners of the isocele triangle are the same. Or the angles opposite to the equal sides of the isocelel triangle are also equal in measurement. Suppose the ABC triangle is an isocele triangle, so that; AB and AC Two sides of the triangle are equal Hence, according to theoret 2; ∠B and ∠C, where ∠B ∠C are the base angles. Theorem 3: Measuring the outer corner of the triangle is equal to the sum of the respective inner angles. For the ABC triangle, ∠1, ∠2 and ∠3 are the inner corners. And ∠4, ∠5 and ∠6 are the three outer corners. Now according to Theorea 3; ∠4 - ∠2 - ∠3 ∠5 - ∠1 - ∠3 ∠6 - ∠1 and ∠2 Also read: Triangles of theOrems for Class 10 Previously we learned about the main theorems of the triangle. Now here we learn about theorems that are covered for the Class 10 curriculum. One of the key theorems, explained mainly for trigonometry, Pythagoras theorem. Theorem 1: If the line is drawn parallel to one side side a triangle that crosses the middle points of the other two sides, then the two sides divide in one ratio. Suppose abc is a triangle and DE is a line parallel to B.C., so it crosses AB to D and RIGHT on E. Hence, according to the theorem: AD/DB and AE/EC Theorem 2: If the line divides any two sides of the triangle in the same ratio, the line is parallel to the third party. Suppose ABC is a triangle, and the DE line separates the two sides of the AB triangle and THE TWO in one ratio, so; AE/EC 3: If the corresponding angles are equal in the two triangles, their respective sides are in the same ratio and therefore the two triangles are similar. Let ∆ABK and ∆P-R are two triangles. Then, according to the theoreme, AB/ P e e b.p. B.C./R. AC/PR (If ∠A and ∠P, ∠B and ∠ and ∠C) and ∠R) and ∆ABK - ∆Theorem of THE PDR 4: If in two triangles the sides of one triangle are proportional to the sides of the other triangle, then their respective angles are equal and therefore the two triangles are similar. Let's ∆ABK and ∆P-R two triangles, then according to theorema; ∠A ∠P, ∠B and ∠C ∠C ∠R (if AB/P/P/EK/PR) and ∆ABK - ∆PD Wikipedia list of articles This list of triangle topics includes things associated with geometric form, either abstractly, as in idealizations studied by geometers, or in triangular arrays such as the Pascal triangle or triangular matrix, or specifically in physical space. It does not include metaphors like a love triangle in which the word has no reference to a geometric shape. Geometry Triangle Sharp and Blunt Triangles Altern Base Height (Triangle) Area Biscector Triangle Corner Bickelr Triangle Corner Bichole Theorem Apollonia Point Apollonia theorem Automedian triangle Barrow inequality Baricentric coordinates (mathematics) Brovard circle Brovard points to Theorem Brockard circumradius) Theorem Carradius) (perpendiculars) Theorema Centroid Seva Cevian Circumconic and inconic Circumcised Circle Clawson Point Cliver (geometry) Congruent isocellizers point Contact Triangle Conway triangle notation CPCTC Delaunay triangulation de Longchamps point Desargues Droz-Farni's theorem line theorem Encyclopedia Triangle centers Equal incircles theorem Equal parallels point Equidissection egalitarian triangle Euler's theorem in the geometry of Erdes-Mordell inequality Exeter point External corner of the Phhriano problem Fermat point Fermat right triangle theorem Fourmann circle Furmann GEOS Circle Gergonne Point Golden Triangle (Mathematics) Gossar perspector Had theorem Hadwieger-Finsler inequality Heilbronn triangle problem heptagon triangle Heron heron formula Hofstedter indicates hyperbolic triangle (non-Euclidean geometry) Hypotenuse and twists triangle Integral Triangle Isodynamic Dot Isogon conjugets isopemetric point Isosceles triangle Isosceles triangle theorem isoma of isotomic conjugated Jacobi isotope lines of the Japanese theorem of the Japanese theorem for concyclical polygons Johnson circles Kepler triangle Cobon triangle problems Theorem Legs Ofe (geometry) theorem (geometry) theorem (geometry) Theorem (geometry)) Middle Triangle Median (geometry) Theorem Mikel Theorem Mikel Mittenpunkt Monsky theorem Morley centers Morley Triangle Morley trisector theorem Ofer Musselman in theorem Nagel point Napoleon's triangle Orthocentral Orthocentral System Orthocentroidal Circle Orthopole Pappus 'area theorem Parry point Pedal Triangle Perpendicular bisectories of the triangle sides of the Arctic Circle (geometry) Theorem Pompeo Pons asinorum Pythagorean theorem Reverse theorem Theorem Reuleaux Angle maximization of the problem Reuschle theorem of the Right Triangle Ruth in the theore of scalene triangle Schwartz Schieffler Theorem Sierpinski System Triangles Simson Line Special Right Triangles Spieker Center Spieker Circle Spiral Theodore Splitter (geometry) circumellipse Steiner inellipse Steiner-Lehmus theorem Stuart Theorem Steiner point Symmedian Tangential Triangle Tarry point Turnery plot Thales'theorem Thomson triangle triangle группы треугольника Треугольные координаты »дисамбигация
Recommended publications
  • Self-Inverse Gemini Triangles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRY Vol. 9 (2020), No. 1, 25 - 39 SELF-INVERSE GEMINI TRIANGLES CLARK KIMBERLING and PETER MOSES Abstract. In the plane of a triangle ABC, every triangle center U = u : v : w (barycentric coordinates) is associated with a central triangle having A-vertex AU = −u : v + w : v + w. The triangle AU BU CU is a self-inverse Gemini triangle. Let mU (X) be the image of a point X under the collineation that maps A; B; C; G respectively onto AU ;BU ;CU ;G, where G is the centroid of ABC. Then mU (mU (X)) = X: Properties of the self-inverse mapping mU are presented, with attention to associated conics (e.g., Jerabek, Kiepert, Feuerbach, Nagel, Steiner), as well as cubics of the types pK(Y; Y ) and pK(U ∗ Y; Y ). 1. Introduction The term Gemini triangle, introduced in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers (ETC [7], just before X(24537)), applies to certain triangles defined by barycentric coordinates. In keeping with the meaning of gemini, these triangles tend to occur in pairs. Specifically, for a given reference triangle ABC with sidelengths a; b; c, a Germini triangle A0B0C0 is a cen- tral triangle ([6], pp. 53-56) with A-vertex given by (1.1) A0 = f(a; b; c): g(b; c; a): g(b; a; c); where f and g are center functions ([6], p. 46). Because A0B0C0 is a central triangle, the vertices B0 and C0 can be read from (1.1) as B0 = g(c; b; a): f(b; c; a): g(c; a; b) C0 = g(a; b; c): g(a; c; b): f(c; a; b): Now suppose that U = u : v : w is a triangle center, and let 0 −u v + w v + w 1 MU = @ w + u −v w + u A : u + v u + v −w Keywords and phrases Triangle, Gemini triangle, barycentric coordinates, collineation, conic, cubic, circumcircle, Jerabek, Kiepert, Feuerbach, Nagel, Steiner (2010)Mathematics Subject Classification: 51N15, 51N20 Received: 13.10.2019.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geometric Proof of the Siebeck–Marden Theorem Beniamin Bogosel
    A Geometric Proof of the Siebeck–Marden Theorem Beniamin Bogosel Abstract. The Siebeck–Marden theorem relates the roots of a third degree polynomial and the roots of its derivative in a geometrical way. A few geometric arguments imply that every inellipse for a triangle is uniquely related to a certain logarithmic potential via its focal points. This fact provides a new direct proof of a general form of the result of Siebeck and Marden. Given three noncollinear points a, b, c ∈ C, we can consider the cubic polynomial P(z) = (z − a)(z − b)(z − c), whose derivative P (z) has two roots f1, f2. The Gauss–Lucas theorem is a well-known result which states that given a polynomial Q with roots z1,...,zn, the roots of its derivative Q are in the convex hull of z1,...,zn. In the simple case where we have only three roots, there is a more precise result. The roots f1, f2 of the derivative polynomial are situated in the interior of the triangle abc and they have an interesting geometric property: f1 and f2 are the focal points of the unique ellipse that is tangent to the sides of the triangle abc at its midpoints. This ellipse is called the Steiner inellipse associated to the triangle abc. In the rest of this note, we use the term inellipse to denote an ellipse situated in a triangle that is tangent to all three of its sides. This geometric connection between the roots of P and the roots of P was first observed by Siebeck (1864) [12] and was reproved by Marden (1945) [8].
    [Show full text]
  • An Area Inequality for Ellipses Inscribed in Quadrilaterals
    1 Introduction It is well known(see [CH], [K], or [MP]) that there is a unique ellipse in- scribed in a given triangle, T , tangent to the sides of T at their respective midpoints. This is often called the midpoint or Steiner inellipse, and it can be characterized as the inscribed ellipse having maximum area. In addition, one has the following inequality. If E denotes any ellipse inscribed in T , then Area (E) π , (trineq) Area (T ) ≤ 3√3 with equality if and only if E is the midpoint ellipse. In [MP] the authors also discuss a connection between the Steiner ellipse and the orthogonal least squares line for the vertices of T . Definition: The line, £, is called a line of best fit for n given points z1, ..., zn n 2 in C, if £ minimizes d (zj ,l) among all lines l in the plane. Here d (zj,l) j=1 denotes the distance(Euclidean)P from zj to l. In [MP] the authors prove the following results, some of which are also proven in 1 n Theorem A: Suppose zj are points in C,g = zj is the centroid, and n j=1 n n 2 2 2 P Z = (zj g) = zj ng . j=1 − j=1 − (a)P If Z = 0, thenP every line through g is a line of best fit for the points z1, ..., zn. (b) If Z = 0, then the line, £, thru g that is parallel to the vector from 6 (0, 0) to √Z is the unique line of best fit for z1, ..., zn.
    [Show full text]
  • Permutation Ellipses
    Journal for Geometry and Graphics Volume 24 (2020), No. 2, 233–247 Permutation Ellipses Clark Kimberling1, Peter J. C. Moses2 1Department of Mathematics, University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana 47722, USA [email protected] 2Engineering Division, Moparmatic Co., Astwood Bank, Nr. Redditch, Worcestershire, B96 6DT, UK [email protected] Abstract. We use homogeneous coordinates in the plane of a triangle to define a family of ellipses having the centroid of the triangle as center. The family, which includes the Steiner circumscribed and inscribed ellipses, is closed under many operations, including permutation of coordinates, complements and anticomple- ments, duality, and inversion. Key Words: barycentric coordinates, Steiner circumellipse, Steiner inellipse, com- plement and anticomplement, dual conic, inversion in ellipse, Frégier ellipse MSC 2020: 51N20, 51N15 1 Introduction In 1827, something revolutionary happened in triangle geometry. A descendant of Martin Luther named Möbius introduced barycentric coordinates. Suddenly, points and lines in the plane of a triangle ABC with sidelengths a, b, c had a new kind of representation, and traditional geometric relationships found new algebraic kinds of expression. The lengths a, b, c came to be regarded as variables or indeterminates, and a criterion for collinearity of three points became the zeroness of a determinant, as did the concurrence of three lines. More recently, algebraic concepts have been imposed on the objects of triangle geometry. You can make up a suitable function f(a, b, c) and say “Let P be the point with barycentric coordinates f(a, b, c): f(b, c, a): f(c, a, b)” and then use algebra to find geometrically notable properties of P .
    [Show full text]
  • Steiner's Hat: a Constant-Area Deltoid Associated with the Ellipse
    KoG•24–2020 R. Garcia, D. Reznik, H. Stachel, M. Helman: Steiner’s Hat: a Constant-Area Deltoid ... https://doi.org/10.31896/k.24.2 RONALDO GARCIA, DAN REZNIK Original scientific paper HELLMUTH STACHEL, MARK HELMAN Accepted 5. 10. 2020. Steiner's Hat: a Constant-Area Deltoid Associated with the Ellipse Steiner's Hat: a Constant-Area Deltoid Associ- Steinerova krivulja: deltoide konstantne povrˇsine ated with the Ellipse pridruˇzene elipsi ABSTRACT SAZETAKˇ The Negative Pedal Curve (NPC) of the Ellipse with re- Negativno noˇziˇsnakrivulja elipse s obzirom na neku nje- spect to a boundary point M is a 3-cusp closed-curve which zinu toˇcku M je zatvorena krivulja s tri ˇsiljka koja je afina is the affine image of the Steiner Deltoid. Over all M the slika Steinerove deltoide. Za sve toˇcke M na elipsi krivulje family has invariant area and displays an array of interesting dobivene familije imaju istu povrˇsinui niz zanimljivih svoj- properties. stava. Key words: curve, envelope, ellipse, pedal, evolute, deltoid, Poncelet, osculating, orthologic Kljuˇcnerijeˇci: krivulja, envelopa, elipsa, noˇziˇsnakrivulja, evoluta, deltoida, Poncelet, oskulacija, ortologija MSC2010: 51M04 51N20 65D18 1 Introduction Main Results: 0 0 Given an ellipse E with non-zero semi-axes a;b centered • The triangle T defined by the 3 cusps Pi has invariant at O, let M be a point in the plane. The Negative Pedal area over M, Figure 7. Curve (NPC) of E with respect to M is the envelope of • The triangle T defined by the pre-images Pi of the 3 lines passing through points P(t) on the boundary of E cusps has invariant area over M, Figure 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Steiner's Hat: a Constant-Area Deltoid Associated with the Ellipse
    STEINER’S HAT: A CONSTANT-AREA DELTOID ASSOCIATED WITH THE ELLIPSE RONALDO GARCIA, DAN REZNIK, HELLMUTH STACHEL, AND MARK HELMAN Abstract. The Negative Pedal Curve (NPC) of the Ellipse with respect to a boundary point M is a 3-cusp closed-curve which is the affine image of the Steiner Deltoid. Over all M the family has invariant area and displays an array of interesting properties. Keywords curve, envelope, ellipse, pedal, evolute, deltoid, Poncelet, osculat- ing, orthologic. MSC 51M04 and 51N20 and 65D18 1. Introduction Given an ellipse with non-zero semi-axes a,b centered at O, let M be a point in the plane. The NegativeE Pedal Curve (NPC) of with respect to M is the envelope of lines passing through points P (t) on the boundaryE of and perpendicular to [P (t) M] [4, pp. 349]. Well-studied cases [7, 14] includeE placing M on (i) the major− axis: the NPC is a two-cusp “fish curve” (or an asymmetric ovoid for low eccentricity of ); (ii) at O: this yielding a four-cusp NPC known as Talbot’s Curve (or a squashedE ellipse for low eccentricity), Figure 1. arXiv:2006.13166v5 [math.DS] 5 Oct 2020 Figure 1. The Negative Pedal Curve (NPC) of an ellipse with respect to a point M on the plane is the envelope of lines passing through P (t) on the boundary,E and perpendicular to P (t) M. Left: When M lies on the major axis of , the NPC is a two-cusp “fish” curve. Right: When− M is at the center of , the NPC is 4-cuspE curve with 2-self intersections known as Talbot’s Curve [12].
    [Show full text]
  • An Elementary Proof of Marden's Theorem
    An Elementary Proof of Marden’s Theorem Dan Kalman What I call Marden’s Theorem is one of my favorite results in mathematics. It es- tablishes a fantastic relation between the geometry of plane figures and the relative positions of roots of a polynomial and its derivative. Although it has a much more general statement, here is the version that I like best: Marden’s Theorem. Let p(z) be a third-degree polynomial with complex coefficients, and whose roots z1,z2, and z3 are noncollinear points in the complex plane. Let T be the triangle with vertices at z1,z2, and z3. There is a unique ellipse inscribed in T and tangent to the sides at their midpoints. The foci of this ellipse are the roots of p(z). I call this Marden’s Theorem because I first read it in M. Marden’s wonderful book [6]. But this material appeared previously in Marden’s earlier paper [5]. In both sources Marden attributes the theorem to Siebeck, citing a paper from 1864 [8]. In- deed, Marden reports appearances of various versions of the theorem in nine papers spanning the period from 1864 to 1928. Of particular interest in what follows below is an 1892 paper by Maxime Bocherˆ [1]. In his presentation Marden states the theorem in a more general form than given m1 above, corresponding to the logarithmic derivative of a product (z − z1) (z − m2 m3 z2) (z − z3) where the only restriction on the exponents m j is that they be nonzero, and with a general conic section taking the place of the ellipse.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed Intersection of Cevians and Perspective Triangles
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOMETRY AND GRAPHICS ©2012 ISGG 1–5 AUGUST, 2012, MONTREAL, CANADA MIXED INTERSECTION OF CEVIANS AND PERSPECTIVE TRIANGLES Boris ODEHNAL Dresden University of Technology, Germany ABSTRACT: Any point P in the plane of a triangle ∆ = (A,B,C) can be considered as the intersection of certain Cevians, whether P is a triangle center or not. Taking two centers, say Y and Z, we find six Cevians with a total of 11 points of intersection, among them ∆’s vertices and Y and Z. The remaining six points form two triangles ∆1 and ∆2 which are both perspective to the base triangle ∆ and to each other. The three centers of perspectivity are triangle centers of ∆ and collinear, independent of the choice of Y and Z. Furthermore any pair out of ∆, ∆1, and ∆2 has the same perspectrix which yields a closed chain of Desargues’ (103,103) configurations. Then special affine appearances of Desargues’ configurations can be obtained by a suitable choice of Y and Z. Any choice of a fixed center Y leads to exactly one center Z as the fourth point of intersection of two conic sections circumscribed to ∆ such that the perspectors P1, P2, and consequently P12 are points at infinity. For fixed center Y we obtain a quadratic transformation in ∆’s plane which transforms central lines to central conic sections. Keywords: triangle, Cevian, perspective triangles, Desargues configuration, triangle center, cross- point 1. INTRODUCTION C Many triangle centers appear as the intersection of certain Cevians. For example the incenter X1 X4 is the intersection of the interior angle bisectors h of a triangle ∆ with vertices A, B, C.
    [Show full text]
  • 104.08 Finding Triangles with Given Circum-Medial Triangle
    The Mathematical Gazette March 2020 104.08 Finding triangles with given circum-medial triangle Let △A1B1C1 be an arbitrary triangle and P an arbitrary point not on its circumcircle Σ. The ‘other’ intersection points of the ‘cevians’ A1PB,,1P C1P with Σ, the points AB,,,C make the so-called circumcevian triangle of △A1B1C1 with respect to PP. If is the centroid of △A1B1C1 then △ABC is called * the circum-medial triangle of △A1B1C1 (see Figure 1: P = centroid G1). C1 A B1 B G1 A1 C FIGURE 1: How to reverse the process of constructing the circum-medial triangle? A recent paper [1] was concerned with iterating the construction of the circum-medial triangle (it turned out that the shape of the triangles converges to equilaterality). Here, we reverse the process. Specifically, given △ABC we look for △A1B1C1 such that △ABC is the circum-medial triangle of △A1B1C1. It turns out that there are in general two solutions, namely, the circumcevian triangles of △ABC with respect to the foci of the Steiner inellipse of △ABC. Theorem 1: Given △ABCGand a point 1 not on its circumcircle Σ, let △A1B1C1 be its circumcevian triangle with respect to G1. Then G1 is the centroid of △A1B1C1 if, and only if, it is a focus of the Steiner inellipse of △ABC. Remark: Since an ellipse has two foci, this yields the two mentioned solutions (see Figure 2), except in the case where △ABC is equilateral, when * Unfortunately, not every language has such short and precise terms for the corresponding triangles. For instance in German there is no such term, one would have to describe the whole process with many words.
    [Show full text]
  • Dao Thanh Oai, Generalizations of Some Famous Classical Euclidean
    International Journal of Computer Discovered Mathematics (IJCDM) ISSN 2367-7775 c IJCDM September 2016, Volume 1, No.3, pp.13-20. Received 15 July 2016. Published on-line 22 July 2016 web: http://www.journal-1.eu/ c The Author(s) This article is published with open access1. Generalizations of some famous classical Euclidean geometry theorems Dao Thanh Oai Cao Mai Doai, Quang Trung, Kien Xuong, Thai Binh, Vietnam e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this note, we introduce generalizations of some famous classical Euclidean geometry theorems. We use problems in order to state the theorems. Keywords. Euclidean geometry, Triangle geometry. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 51-04, 68T01, 68T99. Problem 1 ([1],[2], A generalization the Lester circle theorem associated with the Neuberg cubic). Let P be a point on the Neuberg cubic. Let PA be the reflection of P in line BC, and define PB and PC cyclically. It is known that the lines APA, BPB, CPC concur. Let Q(P ) be the point of concurrence. Then two Fermat points, P , Q(P ) lie on a circle. Remark: Let P is the circumcenter, it is well-know that Q(P ) is the Nine point center, the conjucture becomes Lester circle theorem, you can see the Lester circle theorem in([3],[4]). Problem 2 ([5],[6], A generalization of the Parry circle theorem associated with two isogonal conjugate points). Let a rectangular circumhyperbola of ABC, let L be the isogonal conjugate line of the hyperbola. The tangent line to the hyperbola at X(4) meets L at point K.
    [Show full text]
  • An Area Inequality for Ellipses Inscribed in Quadrilaterals
    Journal of Mathematical Inequalities Volume 4, Number 3 (2010), 431–443 AN AREA INEQUALITY FOR ELLIPSES INSCRIBED IN QUADRILATERALS ALAN HORWITZ (Communicated by S. S. Gomis) Area(E) Abstract. If E is any ellipse inscribed in a convex quadrilateral, –D, then we prove that Area(–D) π , and equality holds if and only if –D is a parallelogram and E is tangent to the sides of –D 4 at the midpoints. We also prove that the foci of the unique ellipse of maximal area inscribed in a parallelogram, –D, lie on the orthogonal least squares line for the vertices of –D. This does not hold in general for convex quadrilaterals. 1. Introduction It is well known (see [1], [4], or [5]) that there is a unique ellipse inscribed in a given triangle, T , tangent to the sides of T at their respective midpoints. This is often called the midpoint or Steiner inellipse, and it can be characterized as the inscribed ellipse having maximum area. In addition, one has the following inequality. If E denotes any ellipse inscribed in T ,then Area(E) π √ , (1) Area(T) 3 3 with equality if and only if E is the midpoint ellipse. In [5] the authors also discuss a connection between the Steiner ellipse and the orthogonal least squares line for the vertices of T . DEFINITION 1. The line, £, is called a line of best fitforn given points z1,...,zn n 2 in C,if£ minimizes ∑ d (z j,l) among all lines l in the plane. Here d (z j,l) denotes j=1 the distance(Euclidean) from z j to l .
    [Show full text]
  • Perspective Fields-Part2 Size
    Part 2 – Algebraic Approach and Theory © Chris van Tienhoven [email protected] There is a most special application for Perspective Fields. Because points are generated structurally in Perspective Fields this also can be seen in the formulas of the points. All points in the field we described earlier (defined by X13, X2, X15, X6) have the same algebraic structure in the formulas of their barycentric coordinates: f (a,b,c) = i a2 SA + j SB SC + k a2∆ Where: ∆ = Area of Reference Triangle a,b,c are lenghts of sides Reference Triangle SA = (-a2 + b2 + c2 ) / 2 SB = ( a2 - b2 + c2 ) / 2 SC = ( a2 + b2 - c2 ) / 2 i, j, k are variables uniquely defining the points in a Perspective Field So every point in the field can be defined as a triple (i : j : k). Because only the ratios of variables i, j, k are of importance the triple can be considered as alternate homogeneous coordinates for fieldpoints. The importance of this is that a fieldpoint now is: independant of sides and angles of the referencetriangle and uniquely defined just by 3 numbers. Look at next picture to see what structure comes out. 2 Homogeneous Coordinates (i : j : k) with respect to barycentric coordinates f (a,b,c) = i a2 SA + j SB SC + k a2∆ Note that for all Fieldpoints: . on X4-X6-Line 1st coordinate = 0 . on BrocardAxis 2nd coordinate = 0 . on Euler Line 3rd coordinate = 0 Note that this formula-structure is only valid for Fieldpoints. Non-fieldpoints will have a different formula-structure. 3 Point of departure: .
    [Show full text]