University of Cape Town

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Cape Town FACEBOOK’S ‘WHITE GENOCIDE’ PROBLEM: A SOCIOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION OF PROBLEMATIC INFORMATION, SHAREABILITY, AND SOCIAL CORRECTION IN A SOUTH AFRICAN CONTEXT by Jessica Ann Barraclough BRRJES005 A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Arts in Media Studies Faculty of the Humanities University of Cape Town 2020 Date of submission: 26/10/2020 Supervisor: Prof. Herman Wasserman, Centre for Film & Media Studies, UCT University of Cape Town COMPULSORY DECLARATION This work has not been previously submitted in whole, or in part, for the award of any degree. It is my own work. Each significant contribution to, and quotation in, this dissertation from the work, or works, of other people has been attributed, and has been cited and referenced. Signature: Date: 19 April 2021 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Herman Wasserman, for his guidance, encouragement, and unwavering patience in the face of my broken deadline promises and pandemic-induced panic attacks. I would also like to thank my little family: Dr. David (Dad) Barraclough, for having supported my academic pursuits for as long as I can remember; not-so-little-sister Caity for endless laughter; and mom, whose strength in life I draw inspiration from every day. We miss you. Special thanks go out to my boyfriend, Tom Southey, who has been patient long enough to feature in my thesis acknowledgements a second time, and who has always encouraged my wildly varying endeavours. I would also like to thank my beautiful friends, who bring a tear to my eye when I think about how lucky I am to have found them. (Vicky, I could never have finished this degree without our shared thesis pains and your advice). And finally, I would like to thank Finn for his furry distractions in dark times. Black Cat would be proud. ABSTRACT A relatively small, but highly visible group of South Africans believe that farm attacks/murders (and other crimes against whites) constitute a targeted ‘white genocide’. Their beliefs have found support and corroboration in various online spaces, but especially within ‘alternative news’ Facebook pages. This case study is used as an opportunity to apply a sociotechnical model of media effects to a very real disinformation problem that continues to inflame race relations in South Africa. Three pivotal questions are addressed, relating to (1) how Facebook users on farm attack/murder-focused pages engage with problematic information (fake news) and why; (2) the qualitative and affordance/format-related themes of posts with the highest share counts on these pages; and (3) the common themes of discourse used in defensive responses to social corrections of false information. Findings suggest that South Africa’s ‘white genocide’ problem is more deep-set than other more ephemeral ‘fake news’ stories, especially due to stark racial and political dichotomies, reflected by the post comment sections herein. Group identities and cognitive biases work to sustain the disproportional media ‘spectacle’ of gratuitous farm attacks/murders against white South Africans, and leverage Facebook’s platform affordances to do so. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1: Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Definitions of ‘fake news’ ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Propaganda discourse in ‘fake news’ .................................................................................................... 7 2.3. The contemporary news landscape and its role in the ‘fake news’ era ................................................ 8 2.4. ‘Active audience’ media effects theory and the pitfalls of early ‘fake news’ research ....................... 11 2.5. Sharing on social media: The participation paradigm, the spreadable spectacle, and social proximity 12 2.6. Filter bubbles and echo chambers ...................................................................................................... 14 2.7. Social and group identity theory, cognitive biases, and the news ...................................................... 15 2.8. ‘Social correction’ of fake news .......................................................................................................... 18 2.9. Marwick’s sociotechnical model of media effects .............................................................................. 20 2.9.1. Actors: Reactive white identities in South Africa and how they make meaning from media .... 20 2.9.1.1. Reactionary Afrikaner whiteness: history and collective identity ..................................... 23 2.9.2. Messages: Problematic information, information modes, and white South African discourse themes 24 2.9.2.1. Modes and mediums of ‘white genocide’ content: ‘Facts’, statistics, ‘documentaries’ and image macros .......................................................................................................................................... 25 2.9.2.2. White reactionary discourse themes and patterns ........................................................... 26 2.9.3. Affordances: ‘Fake news’, Facebook, and the digital divide ...................................................... 30 2.9.3.1. The rise of white-fear, ‘alternative news’ Facebook pages in SA ...................................... 33 2.10. Chapter conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 34 Chapter 3: Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 36 3.1. Qualitative survey ............................................................................................................................... 37 3.1.1. Population .................................................................................................................................. 37 3.1.2. Sampling Frame .......................................................................................................................... 37 3.1.3. Sample ........................................................................................................................................ 38 3.1.4. Data collection ............................................................................................................................ 39 3.1.4.1. Survey Design .................................................................................................................... 40 3.1.4.2. Pilot studies ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.1.4.3. User-friendly design ........................................................................................................... 41 3.1.5. Data analysis ............................................................................................................................... 42 3.1.5.1. Dependability and Conformability ..................................................................................... 43 3.2. Qualitative Content Analysis and Critical Discourse Analysis.............................................................. 44 3.2.1. Population .................................................................................................................................. 45 3.2.1.1. Qualitative Content Analysis.............................................................................................. 45 3.2.1.2. Critical Discourse Analysis ................................................................................................. 45 3.2.2. Samples and Sampling Frames ................................................................................................... 45 3.2.2.1. Qualitative Content Analysis.............................................................................................. 46 3.2.2.2. Critical Discourse Analysis ................................................................................................. 46 3.2.3. Data Collection ........................................................................................................................... 47 3.2.3.1. Qualitative Content Analysis.............................................................................................. 47 3.2.3.2. Critical Discourse Analysis ................................................................................................. 47 3.2.4. Data Analysis .............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and Its Multifarious Enemies
    Angles New Perspectives on the Anglophone World 10 | 2020 Creating the Enemy The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369 ISSN: 2274-2042 Publisher Société des Anglicistes de l'Enseignement Supérieur Electronic reference Maxime Dafaure, « The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies », Angles [Online], 10 | 2020, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 28 July 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/angles/369 This text was automatically generated on 28 July 2020. Angles. New Perspectives on the Anglophone World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The “Great Meme War:” the Alt-Right and its Multifarious Enemies 1 The “Great Meme War:” the Alt- Right and its Multifarious Enemies Maxime Dafaure Memes and the metapolitics of the alt-right 1 The alt-right has been a major actor of the online culture wars of the past few years. Since it came to prominence during the 2014 Gamergate controversy,1 this loosely- defined, puzzling movement has achieved mainstream recognition and has been the subject of discussion by journalists and scholars alike. Although the movement is notoriously difficult to define, a few overarching themes can be delineated: unequivocal rejections of immigration and multiculturalism among most, if not all, alt- right subgroups; an intense criticism of feminism, in particular within the manosphere community, which itself is divided into several clans with different goals and subcultures (men’s rights activists, Men Going Their Own Way, pick-up artists, incels).2 Demographically speaking, an overwhelming majority of alt-righters are white heterosexual males, one of the major social categories who feel dispossessed and resentful, as pointed out as early as in the mid-20th century by Daniel Bell, and more recently by Michael Kimmel (Angry White Men 2013) and Dick Howard (Les Ombres de l’Amérique 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking and Reasoning
    Thinking and Reasoning Thinking and Reasoning ■ An introduction to the psychology of reason, judgment and decision making Ken Manktelow First published 2012 British Library Cataloguing in Publication by Psychology Press Data 27 Church Road, Hove, East Sussex BN3 2FA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication by Psychology Press Data 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Manktelow, K. I., 1952– Thinking and reasoning : an introduction [www.psypress.com] to the psychology of reason, Psychology Press is an imprint of the Taylor & judgment and decision making / Ken Francis Group, an informa business Manktelow. p. cm. © 2012 Psychology Press Includes bibliographical references and Typeset in Century Old Style and Futura by index. Refi neCatch Ltd, Bungay, Suffolk 1. Reasoning (Psychology) Cover design by Andrew Ward 2. Thought and thinking. 3. Cognition. 4. Decision making. All rights reserved. No part of this book may I. Title. be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any BF442.M354 2012 form or by any electronic, mechanical, or 153.4'2--dc23 other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and 2011031284 recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing ISBN: 978-1-84169-740-6 (hbk) from the publishers. ISBN: 978-1-84169-741-3 (pbk) Trademark notice : Product or corporate ISBN: 978-0-203-11546-6 (ebk) names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhill FAPD Notre Dame Excerpt 3519
    Draft: Please do not distribute without the express permission of the author. The following is a compilation of excerpts from the Introduction and Chapter 1 of my book ms, Fear and Present Danger: Extra-factual Sources of Threat Conception and Proliferation. Kelly M. Greenhill Tufts and Harvard Universities When U.S. Senator Arthur Vandenberg famously told President Harry Truman that he would have to “scare the hell out of the American people” to secure support for the coming Cold War, Vandenburg was tapping into a tried and true tradition of strategically cultivating fear to influence attitudes and change behavior. While this tactic has a long history of use, strikingly little has been written on precisely how, why, and when it actually works. To be sure, much has been written on the influence of cognitive biases on decision-makers’ behavior. However, previous IR research has been largely silent on the supply side of this equation: namely, on the strategic triggering and manipulation of audiences' emotions and cognitive biases to influence security-related political attitudes and outcomes. This book offers the first systematic theoretical and empirical exploration of this phenomenon. Coupling findings from recent breakthroughs in cognitive science and psychology with theoretical insights from an array of political science subfields, Fear and Present Danger presents a new international relations-focused explanation of how emotionally resonant threat narratives can materially affect individual attitudes and collective political behavior, through the use of what might be thought of as cognitive hacking. It asks, “when uncertainty is high, and verifiable facts are inconvenient or few, how do individuals learn what to fear and how to respond to the threats they have identified?” These questions lie at the heart of national security decision-making at the highest levels of government as well as at the most intimate levels of human decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Hum 2007 Aaboe J.Pdf
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University The Other and the Construction of Cultural and Christian identity: The Case of the Dutch Reformed Church in Transition Town By Julie Aaboe Cape Thesis submittedof for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Religious Studies Faculty of Humanities University of UniversityCape Town July 2007 Supervisor: John W de Gruchy D\Gn~SEJ\ .c 7 \-4t\\ J'U1j The research in this thesis, unless indicated, is all my own work. No research utilised has been used without proper reference. Julie Aaboe MD et MA 15 August 2007 Cape Town Town Cape of University )l6stract The Other and the Construction of Cultural and Christian identity: The Case of the Dutch Reformed Church in Transition by Julie ,Aa6oe The aim of this thesis is to explore the interaction between cultural and religious identity, and more especially, Christian identity; how they develop in relation to each other, and how they differ. Town This thesis takes as its, starting point the convictionCape that the understanding of, and the relationship to, the other, is what both developsof and distinguishes Christian identity from cultural identity. In order to come to a better understanding of this complex set of relationships, the case of the Dutch Reformed Church in South Africa has been examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online
    Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nani Jansen Reventlow, Jonathon Penney, Amy Johnson, Rey Junco, Casey Tilton, Kate Coyer, Nighat Dad, Adnan Chaudhri, Grace Mutung’u, Susan Benesch, Andres Lombana-Bermudez, Helmi Noman, Kendra Albert, Anke Sterzing, Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Holger Melas, Lumi Zuleta, Simin Kargar, J. Nathan Matias, Nikki Bourassa, and Urs Gasser. 2016. Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication. Published Version https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2017/08/harmfulspeech Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33746096 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Harmful Speech Online Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online a collection of essays August 2017 Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online Acknowledgments I am deeply grateful to the writers and thinkers who dedicated their time to contributing a piece to this collection and shared their ideas and research with us. Special thanks to Susan Benesch, who gave thoughtful and insightful feedback into the collection’s con- struction and served as a guiding light throughout its assembly, and to Sandra Cortesi, who shared sage advice and offered recommendations that shaped the collection’s development. I thank the members of the Harmful Speech Online project at Berkman Klein, whose work is helping to illuminate the many challenges, problems, ideas, and solutions related to harmful speech online, and knitting together a common understanding of these.
    [Show full text]
  • Yes: Affirmative Consent As a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms
    Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms Jane Im Jill Dimond Melody Berton Una Lee University of Michigan Sassafras Tech Collective Sassafras Tech Collective And Also Too Ann Arbor, MI, USA Ann Arbor, MI, USA Ann Arbor, MI, USA Toronto, Ontario, Canada [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Katherine Mustelier Mark Ackerman Eric Gilbert University of Michigan University of Michigan University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA Ann Arbor, MI, USA Ann Arbor, MI, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Affirmative consent is the idea that someone must ask for,and Affirmative consent is the idea that someone must ask for—and earn, enthusiastic approval before interacting with someone else. earn—enthusiastic approval before interacting with another per- For decades, feminist activists and scholars have used affirmative son [62, 93]. Sometimes referred to by the shorthand “yes means consent to theorize and prevent sexual assault. In this paper, we yes,” affirmative consent is, at its core, a precursor to interpersonal ask: Can affirmative consent help to theorize online interaction? interaction designed to ensure agency and positive outcomes. For Drawing from feminist, legal, and HCI literature, we introduce the decades, feminist activists and scholars have used it to theorize feminist theory of affirmative consent and use it to analyze social and prevent sexual assault [62, 80, 93]. Here, we ask: Can affirma- computing systems. We present affirmative consent’s five core con- tive consent similarly help theorize online interaction and, perhaps, cepts: it is voluntary, informed, revertible, specific, and unburden- prevent its harms? some.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Harassment and Content Moderation: the Case of Blocklists
    Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists SHAGUN JHAVER, SUCHETA GHOSHAL, AMY BRUCKMAN, and ERIC GILBERT, Georgia Institute of Technology Online harassment is a complex and growing problem. On Twitter, one mechanism people use to avoid ha- rassment is the blocklist, a list of accounts that are preemptively blocked from interacting with a subscriber. In this article, we present a rich description of Twitter blocklists – why they are needed, how they work, and their strengths and weaknesses in practice. Next, we use blocklists to interrogate online harassment – the forms it takes, as well as tactics used by harassers. Specifically, we interviewed both people who use block- lists to protect themselves, and people who are blocked by blocklists. We find that users are not adequately protected from harassment, and at the same time, many people feel that they are blocked unnecessarily and unfairly. Moreover, we find that not all users agree on what constitutes harassment. Based on our findings, we propose design interventions for social network sites with the aim of protecting people from harassment, while preserving freedom of speech. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in collaborative and social com- puting; Ethnographic studies; Additional Key Words and Phrases: Online harassment, moderation, blocking mechanisms, gamergate, blocklists ACM Reference format: Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018. Online Harassment and Con- tent Moderation: The Case of Blocklists. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 2, Article 12 (March 2018), 33 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185593 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Online Harassment In mid 2016, 25-year-old Erin Schrode was in the middle of her congressional campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biographical Study of White Afrikaans Speaking Identity in Central South Africa
    Old stories and new chapters: A biographical study of white Afrikaans speaking identity in central South Africa by Paul Conrad Kotze Dissertation submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SOCIETATIS SCIENTIAE: SOCIOLOGY (The Narrative Study of Lives) in the FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES (Department of Sociology) at the UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE February 2013 Bloemfontein, South Africa Supervisor: Prof Jan K Coetzee (Department of Sociology, UFS) Co-supervisor: Dr Florian Elliker (Department of Sociology, UFS) DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation submitted in completion of the degree Magister Artium at the University of the Free State is my own, original work and has not been submitted previously at another university, faculty or department. I furthermore concede copyright of this dissertation to the University of the Free State. Paul Conrad Kotze Bloemfontein, South Africa February 2013 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am greatly indebted to the following people and institutions, all of whom played a role in making this dissertation possible through their ongoing support, advice and understanding: My supervisors, Prof Jan K Coetzee and Dr Florian Elliker, for the stimulus to undertake this study, and the guidance and direction needed to make a success of it. My colleagues in the Department of Sociology and the programme in The Narrative Study of Lives, for their assistance and shared wisdom during the course of this study. The National Research Foundation (NRF) and UFS Research Cluster on Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Development, for their financial support, without which this study would not have been possible. My family and friends and especially my parents, Paul and Josina Kotze, for encouraging me to pursue my dreams and providing a foundation of material and emotional support that enabled me to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxygen of Amplification Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators Online
    The Oxygen of Amplification Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators Online By Whitney Phillips EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAPPING THE MEDIA ECOSYSTEM We live in a time where new forms of power are emerging, where social and digital media are being leveraged to reconfigure the information landscape. This new domain requires journalists to take what they know about abuses of power and media manipulation in traditional information ecosystems and apply that knowledge to networked actors, such as white nationalist networks online. These actors create new journalistic stumbling blocks that transcend attempts to manipulate reporters solely to spin a beneficial narrative – which reporters are trained to decode – and instead represent a larger effort focused on spreading hateful ideology and other false and misleading narratives, with news coverage itself harnessed to fuel hate, confusion, and discord. The choices reporters and editors make about what to cover and how to cover it play a key part in regulating the amount of oxygen supplied to the falsehoods, antagonisms, and manipulations that threaten to overrun the contemporary media ecosystem—and, simultaneously, threaten to undermine democratic discourse more broadly. This context demands that journalists and the newsrooms that support them examine with greater scrutiny how these actors and movements endeavor to subvert journalism norms, practices, and objectives. More importantly, journalists, editors, and publishers must determine how the journalistic rule set must be strengthened and fortified against this newest form of journalistic manipulation—in some cases through the rigorous upholding of long-standing journalistic principles, and in others, by recognizing which practices and structural limitations make reporters particularly vulnerable to manipulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Extremity of a Persuasive Message Position Interacts with Argument Quality to Predict
    Extremity of a Persuasive Message Position Interacts with Argument Quality to Predict Attitude Change Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lucas Daniel Hinsenkamp, M.A. Graduate Program in Psychology The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee Richard E Petty, Advisor Duane T Wegener Russell H Fazio Copyrighted by Lucas Daniel Hinsenkamp 2018 Abstract When crafting a persuasive message, what is the effect of the extremity of the message’s position? Past work has demonstrated that, with greater extremity comes greater movement in recipients’ positions. However, there is also evidence that the reverse can occur: Greater extremity can lead to greater counter-arguing and reduced persuasion. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion provides a framework to understand the range of demonstrated and possible effects, postulating that any variable in a persuasion context can function in multiple ways: serving as central arguments to be scrutinized, peripheral cues of positivity or negativity when not carefully scrutinized, or determining the extent or direction of message-related processing. Whether position extremity can determine the amount of message-related processing has not been rigorously investigated. Across two sets of two studies each, we demonstrate that, indeed, the extremity of a message can determine the amount of message-related processing. Through this process, we demonstrate that, although an extreme position may not be accepted, it can create positive attitude change if supported by strong arguments, as it increases processing of the strong supporting reasons. If supported by weak, easy-to-counterargue arguments, however, an extreme position has a negative effect on persuasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiritual Laws and Supernatural Power… 36
    The Universe Within A Unicorn’s Manual II EDITION Charles Smith III Formatted and Edited by Paul Millage & Charles Patrick Robinson Cover Art Illustrated by Anna Jackson 1 Unicorn: an abstract variable for any marginalized demographic of society. 2 Dedicated to my mother, and anyone who has ever felt lost, insecure or inadequate. I hope this helps. Kings and Queens –ALL of us. Joy comes from within. 3 When I was a young child, my classmates and I congregated in the school gymnasium for a theatrical play in which the antagonist attempted to extract all the colors from the world. 4 Acknowledgments and Special Thanks This is a satirical conglomerate of affirmations, mantras, quotation, and spiritual intermediary interpretation. A multidimensional prismatic explanation of existence. A wizard’s spell book. A divine hodgepodge with a sporadic all-inclusive element of tangentiality; just like the absurdity of articulating the great divine. You will notice numerous quotes throughout these pages. It’s my way of paying tribute and homage to the greats who have come before me. I believe the divine lives within and speaks through each of us. I piece together different ideas to find common truths, therefore creating a larger, more beautiful reality. I offer up a unified voice throughout existence stitched together by a common thread of destiny called love. A cosmic game of “connect the dots.” I invite the reader to inquire and support the plethora of artists I've paid homage to, for if I've seen further it's because I've stood on the shoulders of giants.
    [Show full text]