A Methodology, with Special Reference to Kingston Godfrey Spragge
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Document généré le 1 oct. 2021 04:57 Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine New Directions for Historic Conservation: A Methodology, with Special Reference to Kingston Godfrey Spragge Volume 16, numéro 1, june 1987 Résumé de l'article Les petits hameaux périphériques se développent autour des grands centres et URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1017945ar finissent par être engloutis dans l’expansion urbaine. Ces hameaux ont été DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1017945ar dans le passé des communautés prospères, avec une histoire sociale et nous ont laissé un héritage physique. Peu de bâtiments remarquables au plan Aller au sommaire du numéro architectural ont été construits dans ces hameaux, et les anciens habitants n’ont pas fait souvent parler d’eux dans les histoires. Mais, lorsque l’histoire sociale est combinée avec les traces physiques des hameaux, cela fournit dans Éditeur(s) plusieurs cas la base de la préservation de ce qu’il en reste. Cet article développe une méthodologie d’aménagement, indiquant les ressources Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine historiques susceptibles de conduire à la préservation des bâtiments qui faisaient partie de ces hameaux. Des exemples situés à proximité de la vieille ISSN ville de Kingston dans le Haut-Canada illustrent cet article. 0703-0428 (imprimé) 1918-5138 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Spragge, G. (1987). New Directions for Historic Conservation: A Methodology, with Special Reference to Kingston. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 16(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.7202/1017945ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1987 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ New Directions for Historic Conservation1: A Methodology, with Special Reference to Kingston Godfrey Spragge Résumé/Abstract Les petits hameaux périphériques se développent autour des grands centres et finissent par être engloutis dans l'expansion urbaine. Ces hameaux ont été dans le passé des communautés prospères, avec une histoire sociale et nous ont laissé un héritage physique. Peu de bâtiments remarquables au plan architectural ont été construits dans ces hameaux, et les anciens habitants n'ont pas fait souvent parler d'eux dans les histoires. Mais, lorsque l'histoire sociale est combinée avec les traces physiques des hameaux, cela fournit dans plusieurs cas la base de la préservation de ce qu'il en reste. Cet article développe une méthodologie d'aménagement, indiquant les ressources historiques susceptibles de conduire à la préservation des bâtiments qui faisaient partie de ces hameaux. Des exemples situés à proximité de la vieille ville de Kingston dans le Haut-Canada illustrent cet article. Small outlying hamlets develop around major centres, which are later swallowed up in urban expansion. These hamlets were once thriving communities which have a social history, and which have left us a physical heritage. Few buildings of major architectural significance were built in these hamlets, and the people who lived there were often not those written about in histories. But when the social history is combined with the physical evidence of the hamlets there is in some cases a basis for preserving what remains of them. This article develops a planning methodology, noting historical resources, which might lead to the preser• vation of buildings which were part of these hamlets. The article is illustrated with examples near the old Town of Kingston in Upper Canada. Connection with the past is a prerequisite for the likely to be the target of the wrecker's ball, than the object appearance of a new and self-confident tradition.2 of a consensus to preserve and upgrade them. Concern about heritage conservation was being expressed By the 1960s, confrontations between developers and in Canada in the 1920s. In 1933, Eric Arthur, a Toronto conservationists became more common, but there were some architect and professor of architecture at the University of conservation successes. Canada was beginning to produce a Toronto, founded the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario. small corps of restoration architects. William Goulding at Buildings such as the Barnum House in Grafton, Ontario the University of Toronto's School of Architecture was were preserved, and Arthur laid the groundwork for an drawing on volunteer organizations to produce a listing of expansion of interest in architectural history and in conser• buildings of historic and/or architectural importance in vation through his courses at the university. But World War Ontario. However, Goulding died before the work was com• II, 1939 to 1945, drew talent and materials away from such pleted, and the project was abandoned. "In January, 1963, effort; and after the war social goals tended to be concen• Heritage Trust of Nova Scotia, a society dedicated to the trated on the expansion of cities to accommodate their preservation of historic Nova Scotian buildings and struc• burgeoning populations, and on the rebuilding of urban core tures, held a reorganization meeting to establish new interest areas and the razing of slums. Older buildings were more in the architectural heritage of the Province."3 In 1970 the Canadian Inventory of Historic Building was Urban History Review/Revue d'histoire urbaine, Vol. XVI, No. 1 launched by Parks Canada. Local initiative was evident in [June/juin 1987] the appointment by the City of Kingston of a Committee of 49 Urban History Review/Revue d'histoire urbaine Architectural Review in 1970. In 1973 British Columbia Urban growth does not occur in a linear, predictable fash• amended the Municipal Act to permit heritage designation; ion. In the late 1940s and early 1950s it was possible to and the next year Ontario passed the Ontario Heritage Act, clearly identify the separate communities around cities. Now, 1974. Heritage Canada, a national charitable foundation, many of these are scarcely recognizable and assumed noth• was founded in 1973 to promote the conservation of heritage ing more than part of the expanded city; they are structures and natural landscape. In 1974 it began a series indistinguishable with almost forgotten names. In Toronto, of publications, one of which was the "Canadian Heritage for example, Long Branch, New Toronto, Weston, Lansing, Legislation Series." These are only a few of the efforts taken and many other communities are now part of Metropolitan to institutionalize the process of heritage conservation across Toronto, and Oakville, Thornhill and Richmond Hill, and Canada during the 1970s and earlier. Despite pressure from Ajax are very much within the area of economic domination heritage-minded individuals and groups, heritage legislation of Toronto. Port Hope and Cobourg, Barrie and Orillia, and passed in Canada was weak.4 Hamilton are all near the edge of the Toronto commu- tershed. Each of these small centres has its own history, and In her preservation handbook, Ann Falkner states that: its own historic buildings. The transition from town to suburb has changed much, but the town has left its mark. The first step in building preservation is a survey: a stock• taking or survey of your community's assets of worth• A direct analogy with 18th century growth of larger while buildings. You will already have some feeling for centres (one can hardly call them metropolitan centres) in what you wish to preserve. You are aware of certain Upper Canada is possible. The trends of the past few decades buildings that, for one reason or another, are important are not new. The growth that has taken place, while impres• to your city or town. Some will have been historically sive, is similar to what happened at various periods of growth researched; some will have been given newspaper cover• in the past. To discover historic buildings one can trace the age; a few may have been noted in general books on Canadian architecture; others may have been listed or patterns of growth, and discover pockets of older buildings discussed by a local historical society.6 among the newer. These patterns may not be obvious from a visual search. She is concerned both with the way that preservation is undertaken, "The idea of preservation — of a single house But for Kingston, at least, these patterns have become or a whole neighbourhood — should begin at the street level better known during the past decade. Articles discussing life 9 and work upward, rather than at the federal or provincial in residential enclaves or hamlets beyond the town bound• level working down,"6 and the results of an inadequate aries speak of the social and ethnic mix of the population, approach to preservation: "The special structures may even• but not of the physical evidence of those hamlets that still tually be recognized and preserved by a government exist. Esoteric articles in learned journals have their place, department or a large preservation group, but the accom• but one of the purposes of heritage conservation is to make panying buildings are often overlooked or underrated and the evidence of history readily available to the general pub• thoughtlessly destroyed."7 She suggests that "There must lic. For this purpose, identification not only of the location ... be a good, economically sound justification for saving an of areas of early development but of the surviving buildings old building on a desirable piece of property."8 and their relative importance in the development of our environment, the creation of a sense of place, is important.