Pavement Condition Indexes A.I.P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pavement Condition Indexes A.I.P MONTANA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN 2012 UPDATE - PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEXES A.I.P. 3-30-0000-010-2012 prepared for: Aeronautics Division 2630 Airport Road P.O. Box 200507 Helena, Montana 59620-0507 (406) 444-2506 prepared by: Stelling Engineers, Inc. 614 Park Drive South Great Falls, MT 59405 February, 2013 Montana Aviation System Plan – 2012 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Page No. 1.1 Project Description.................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 The Pavement Management System ....................................................................... 1-5 1.3 Scope of Services .................................................................................................... 1-6 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT APPROACH 2.1 Historical Data Collection....................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Network and Sample Definition ............................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Pavement Condition Surveys .................................................................................. 2-5 2.4 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ............................................................................ 2-7 2.5 PCI Calculations ..................................................................................................... 2-7 2.6 Pavement Families .................................................................................................. 2-8 2.7 Family Analyses.................................................................................................... 2-10 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 Family Analysis Curves .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 PCI Predictions ....................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 System-Wide Pavement Conditions ....................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Maintenance Priorities .......................................................................................... 3-13 3.5 Maintenance Practices .......................................................................................... 3-17 3.6 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Planning ............................................................ 3-18 3.7 Other MicroPAVER Reports ................................................................................ 3-23 3.8 Continued Micropaver Implementation ................................................................ 3-23 CHAPTER 4 AIRPORT REPORT SUMMARIES 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Inspection Report Summaries ................................................................................. 4-1 4.3 Maintenance Report Summaries ............................................................................. 4-1 4.4 Inspection Photos .................................................................................................... 4-2 4.5 FAA Form 5320-1................................................................................................... 4-2 4.6 Reports .................................................................................................................... 4-2 APPENDIX i Montana Aviation System Plan – 2012 Update LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES Page No. 1.1 Montana’s Pavement Management System - 2009 Update .................................... 1-2 2.1 Selection of Minimum Number of Sample Units ................................................... 2-2 2.2 Example Sample Unit Selection ............................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Section Category Criteria ........................................................................................ 2-9 2.4 Section Properties and Family Assignments ......................................................... 2-12 2.5 PCI vs. Age - Allowable Extremes/Boundaries .................................................... 2-21 3.1 Summary of PCI Ratings ........................................................................................ 3-5 3.2 Pavement Projected to Go Subcritical, by Pavement Area ................................... 3-14 3.3 Pavement Projected to Go Subcritical, by % of Each Airport’s Pavement Area . 3-15 3.4 Percent of Each Airport’s Pavement with 2012 Subcritical PCI .......................... 3-16 3.5 First Year Localized Maintenance Policies .......................................................... 3-21 3.6 First Year Localized Maintenance Costs .............................................................. 3-22 3.7 Example First Year Repair Consequences ............................................................ 3-22 3.8 Global Maintenance Costs and Consequences ..................................................... 3-22 3.9 Effective Major M & R Priorities ......................................................................... 3-22 A.1 Pavement Distresses A.2 Sections Omitted from 2012 PCI Survey A.3 First Year Repair Consequences FIGURES 1.1 Montana Airports’ Pavement Database Map .......................................................... 1-4 2.1 Concrete and Asphalt Pavement Inspection Sheets ................................................ 2-4 2.2 PCI Calculation Steps ............................................................................................. 2-6 Family Life Cycle Curves: 2.3 ACPL Asphalt Pavements With Less Than 12,500 lb. Load Rating .................... 2-21 2.4 STPA Bituminous Surface Treated Pavements of All Load Ratings ................... 2-22 2.5 ACAH Asphalt Aprons With Higher Than 30,000 lb. Load Rating ..................... 2-22 2.6 ACRH Asphalt Runways & Taxiways With Higher Than 30,000 lb. Load Rating ........................................................................................................... 2-23 2.7 ACRML Asphalt RWs & TWs, Load Rating 12,500 to 30,000 lb, 5000 or Fewer Ops. ........................................................................................................ 2-23 2.8 ACRMU Asphalt RWs & TWs, Load Rating 12,500 to 30,000 lb, Over 5000 Ops. ..................................................................................................... 2-24 2.9 ACAM Asphalt Aprons With Load Rating From 12,500 to 30,000 lb.. .............. 2-24 2.10 PCAA Portland Concrete Cement - All Sections ................................................. 2-25 2.11 Pavement Life Cycle ............................................................................................. 2-25 3.1 MicroPAVER PCI Prediction Process .................................................................... 3-3 3.2 System-wide Pavement Condition Ratings ........................................................... 3-12 3.3 Extended Pavement Life Cycle ............................................................................. 3-17 3.4 Cost by PCI Assumptions ..................................................................................... 3-19 A.1 Family Comparisons A.2 Pavement Distresses by Causes ii Montana Aviation System Plan – 2012 Update ABBREVIATIONS AAC Pavement surface type - structural asphalt overlays of asphalt AC Pavement surface type - asphalt I bot mix I plant mix bituminous surface course ACAH Pavement Family- Asphalt Aprons With Higher Than 30,000 lb. Load Rating ACAM Pavement Family- Asphalt Aprons With Load Rating From 12,500 to 30,000 lb. ACPL Pavement Family- Asphalt Pavements With Less Than 12,500 lb. Load Rating ACRH Pavement Family- Asphalt Runways & Taxiways With Higher Than 30,000 lb. Load Rating ACRML Pavement Family- Asphalt RWs & TWs, Load Rating 12,500 to 30,000 lb, 5000 or Fewer Ops. ACRMU Pavement Family- Asphalt RWs & TWs, Load Rating 12,500 to 30,000 lb, Over 5000 Ops. Agg Aggregate / gravel as a manufactured structural layer of a pavement section AlP Airport Improvement Program- FAA funding for airport maintenance and construction APC Pavement surface type - structural asphalt overlays of concrete BST Pavement surface type - bituminous surface treatments I single shot I double shot I triple shot FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAAAC Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular FOD Foreign object debris. Loose material on a pavement surface that could cause aircraft damage Form 5320-1 FAA-format for an airport pavement map with construction and maintenance history GA General Aviation Global Maintenance policy applied to the whole pavement (e.g. fog seals, overlays) H High - degree of severity for an asphalt defect HLNIADO FAA's Helena Airports District Office L Low - degree of severity for an asphalt defect L&TCR Longitudinal and transverse cracking LF Linear foot (unit of length) Local Maintenance policy applied to small sections of a pavement (e.g. crack seal, patching) M Medium - degree of severity for an asphalt defect M&R Maintenance and rehabilitation MAD Montana Aeronautics Division Major<Crit Reconstruction of a pavement after its condition has dropped below the critical PCI Major>Crit Reconstruction of a pavement before its condition has dropped below the critical PCI MDT Montana Department of Transportation N No degree of severity for an asphalt defect is defined, the defect is either present or not NWM FAA's Northwest Mountain Region Ops Aircraft operations (takeoff or landing) P-152 FAA designation for compacting native soils P-154 FAA designation for subbase
Recommended publications
  • Page 1 NATIONAL FLIGHT DATA DIGEST Aeronautical Information
    NATIONAL FLIGHT DATA DIGEST Aeronautical Information Services National Flight Data Center Toll Free 1-866-295-8236 Wednesday NO. 076 04/21/2021 EFFECTIVE UPON PUBLICATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY AN EFFECTIVE DATE NAVAIDS ALASKA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ADAK ISLAND ADAK TACAN IDENT BER LAT 51-52-16.43 N LONG 176-40-26.8 W MAG VAR 7 E MODIFIED NORTH DAKOTA NFDD 076 - 2 04/21/2021 GRAND FORKS RED RIVER TACAN IDENT RDR LAT 47-57-25.41 N LONG 097-24-21.69 W RMK ....MILITARY VALIDATED (FIL FIDEX-RDR-200033).... NOTE RMK DME UNUSBL 209-219 BYD 30 NM. MODIFIED WAKE ISLAND NFDD 076 - 3 04/21/2021 WAKE ISLAND WAKE ISLAND VORTAC IDENT AWK LAT 19-17-11.69 N LONG 166-37-38.4 E NAVAID STATUS OPERATIONAL IFR MODIFIED RMK ....MILITARY VALIDATED (FIL FIDEX-AWK-200127).... NOTE RMK VOR UNUSBL 120-175 BYD 35 NM. DELETED INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEMS GEORGIA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ATLANTA ATLANTA RGNL FALCON FLD AIRPORT ILS/DME RWY 31 IDENT I-FFC DME DME STATUS OPERATIONAL IFR MODIFIED RMK DME UNUSBL BYD 25 DEGS L OF CRS. DELETED RMK ILS CLASSIFICATION CODE IA. MODIFIED Page 1 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS MICHIGAN NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 SAGINAW MBS INTL-ATCT IDENT MBS FREQUENCIES FREQUENCY 118.45 DELETED FREQUENCY USE ASR DELETED APCH/DEP CALL GREAT LAKES FREQUENCY 120.95 DELETED FREQUENCY USE APCH/S DEP/S DELETED AIRPORT ALASKA NFDD 076 - 1 04/21/2021 ATQASUK ATQASUK EDWARD BURNELL SR MEML AIRPORT ( ATK ) 50044.5A LATITUDE - 70-28-01.6 N LONGITUDE - 157-26-08.4 W RMK COLD TEMPERATURE RESTRICTED AIRPORT.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Safetaxi Americas Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle
    SafeTaxi Americas Coverage List – 21S5 Cycle Brazil Acre Identifier Airport Name City State SBCZ Cruzeiro do Sul International Airport Cruzeiro do Sul AC SBRB Plácido de Castro Airport Rio Branco AC Alagoas Identifier Airport Name City State SBMO Zumbi dos Palmares International Airport Maceió AL Amazonas Identifier Airport Name City State SBEG Eduardo Gomes International Airport Manaus AM SBMN Ponta Pelada Military Airport Manaus AM SBTF Tefé Airport Tefé AM SBTT Tabatinga International Airport Tabatinga AM SBUA São Gabriel da Cachoeira Airport São Gabriel da Cachoeira AM Amapá Identifier Airport Name City State SBMQ Alberto Alcolumbre International Airport Macapá AP Bahia Identifier Airport Name City State SBIL Bahia-Jorge Amado Airport Ilhéus BA SBLP Bom Jesus da Lapa Airport Bom Jesus da Lapa BA SBPS Porto Seguro Airport Porto Seguro BA SBSV Deputado Luís Eduardo Magalhães International Airport Salvador BA SBTC Hotéis Transamérica Airport Una BA SBUF Paulo Afonso Airport Paulo Afonso BA SBVC Vitória da Conquista/Glauber de Andrade Rocha Vitória da Conquista BA Ceará Identifier Airport Name City State SBAC Aracati/Aeroporto Regional de Aracati Aracati CE SBFZ Pinto Martins International Airport Fortaleza CE SBJE Comandante Ariston Pessoa Cruz CE SBJU Orlando Bezerra de Menezes Airport Juazeiro do Norte CE Distrito Federal Identifier Airport Name City State SBBR Presidente Juscelino Kubitschek International Airport Brasília DF Espírito Santo Identifier Airport Name City State SBVT Eurico de Aguiar Salles Airport Vitória ES *Denotes
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Center Offers New Program
    SPORTS MONTANA Pioneers sweep Montana lawmakers Williston State revisit dress code College. Page 7 some call sexist. Page 3 Miles City Monday, March 22, 2021 STARMiles City, Montana $1.00 Riding lessons to be offered Mental health By HANNA KAMBICH Star Staff Writer Grab the kids, their cow- center offers boy hats and head east for horseback riding lessons or trail rides. Kristen Schaaf is offering horseback riding lessons new program three days a week after school to anybody seven and By ASHLEY WISE older. These lessons will con- Star Editor sist of basic horse care such as grooming and tacking the A new program will soon horse, as well as Western rid- begin at the Eastern Mon- ing techniques. tana Community Mental “I am very excited, it’s Health Center. going to be a lot of fun,” said According to Jeff Regan, Schaaf. chief operating officer, the She looks forward to program is Assertive Com- bringing this opportunity to munity Treatment (ACT). Miles City. The ACT program focus- whole individual not just “I love to share the experi- es on helping mental health the mental health.” ence of horses with other center clients stay out of The program will cover people,” she said. the Emergency Room or two regions but will start Schaaf has owned horses facilities like Warm with the southern region her whole life and spent the Springs. To do this staff that includes Miles City, past five years in California members will help with Forsyth, Terry and Baker. offering trail rides. basic needs like taking The staff includes 10 She also barrel races in medications, getting up and people, each covering a dif- her spare time.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Receive Notice to Vacate VA by DERRICK CALHOUN Gallery Building, Which the Location in 30 Years,” Ting Back to Them Quickly
    MONTANA/REGION SPORTS Montana Senate Pioneers drop advances bill banning overtime battle to end transgender athletes. Page 3 playoffs. Page 10 Miles City Wednesday, March 31, 2021 STARMiles City, Montana $1.00 Police receive notice to vacate VA By DERRICK CALHOUN Gallery building, which the location in 30 years,” ting back to them quickly. Star Staff Writer City of Miles City bought Colombik said. “We have “I wish we didn’t have to for their use. The building been in the VA complex move at all,” Hollowell said. The Miles City Police requires renovations though since 1999.” “I know we went through a Department have received so for the time being the About the temporary long process on figuring out notice that they must vacate MCPD will be operating out space the MCPD will be a public safety building. It the Veteran’s Administra- of a smaller, temporary operating out of while reno- really hit us hard, having to tion building by June 30. area in the back of the vations are completed move, but it was probably According to MCPD building. Colombik said its going to something that would have Chief Doug Colombik, they For Colombik, the move be tough, but the front area had to happen eventually.” are prepared and getting is the third time in his ten- is the long term plan. Hollowell added that they ready to move. “To m o v e ure with the MCPD that According to Miles City are pretty happy with the while also maintaining our they have had to move.
    [Show full text]
  • May 7,2009 Be Available in the Near Future at Http
    Monlo no De porlme nf of lronsoo rt oii on Jim Lvnch, Dîrector *ruhrylaùtlthNde 2701 Prospect Avenue Brîon Schweífzer, Gov ernor PO Box 201001 Heleno MT 59620-1001 May 7,2009 Ted Mathis Gallatin Field 850 Gallatin Field Road #6 Belgrade MT 59714 Subject: Montana Aimorts Economic knpact Study 2009 Montana State Aviation System Plan Dear Ted, I am pleased to announce that the Economic Impact Study of Montana Airports has been completed. This study was a two-year collaborative eflort between the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Aeronautics Division, the Federal Aviation Administration, Wilbur Smith and Associates and Morrison Maierle Inc. The enclosed study is an effort to break down aviation's significant contributions in Montana and show how these impacts affect economies on a statewide and local level. Depending on your location, you may also find enclosed several copies of an individual economic summary specific to your airport. Results ofthe study clearly show that Montana's 120 public use airports are a major catalyst to our economy. Montana enplanes over 1.5 million prissengers per year at our 15 commercial service airports, half of whom are visiting tourists. The economic value of aviation is over $1.56 billion and contributes nearly 4.5 percent to our total gross state product. There arc 18,759 aviation dependent positions in Montana, accounting for four percent of the total workforce and $600 million in wages. In addition to the economic benefits, the study also highlights how Montana residents increasingly depend on aviation to support their healtþ welfare, and safety. Montana airports support critical services for medical care, agriculture, recreation, emergency access, law enforcement, and fire fighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes 2012
    Sanders County | Northwest Montana | Sanders | Thompson Falls | Plains | Hot Springs | ... Page 1 of 69 HOME DEPARTMENTS EVENTS & NOTICES LINKS PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SANDERS COUNTY, MONTANA January 3, 2012 The Board of County Commissioners of Sanders County, Montana, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. Present were Carol Brooker, Chairman; A. B. (Tony) Cox and Glen E. Magera, Commissioners. The Board met with Dan Miles, Director of Land Services, to discuss the following issues: 1) new Sanders County Flood Plain Regulations and maps, 2) Capital Improvement Project, 3) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and 4) Kootenai National Forest Plan. Commissioner Magera motioned to appoint A. B. (Tony) Cox as Presiding Officer of the Sanders County Board of Commissioners for 2012. Commissioner Cox seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously. Commissioner Brooker turned the meeting over to Commissioner Cox. The Boards and Committees that the Commission will attend in 2012 are as follows: Commissioner Brooker Commissioner Cox Commissioner Magera MACo’s Public Land Committee: Vice-Chair Avista Management Committee Sanders County Council on Aging Child Development Center-Board of Directors: Vice-Chair Flathead Valley Chemical Dependency Community Action Partnership (NWHR) Regional Mental Health-Board of Directors: Vice-Chair Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) Agency on Aging Area VI Sanders Forest Collaborative Group-Chair Sanders County Solid Waste District attends SC Weed Board
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-01-22 Aeronautics Board Meeting Minutes
    January 22, 2015 Montana Aeronautics Board Helena, MT January 22, 2015 Aeronautics Board Department of Transportation Tricia McKenna, Board Chair Debbie Alke, MDT Aeronautics Rob Buckles Patty Kautz, MDT Aeronautics Chuck Manning Carol Grell Morris, MDT Legal Walt McNutt Tim Conway, MDT Aeronautics Fred Lark Wade Cebulski, MDT Aeronautics Chris Edwards Pat Wise, MDT Deputy Director Fred Leistiko Bill Hunt Guests Dan Sager, Powell County Fred LeLacheur, Morrison-Maierle Bruce Anderson, Powell County Rick Newman, Lake County Airport Board Ron Kelley, Powell County Bill Burkland, RPA Sam Weidner, Lewistown Shaun Shea, Morrison-Maierle Nigel Davis, Morrison-Maierle Craig Canfield, KLJ Andy Galen, Morrison-Maierle Nathan Schroht, KLJ Jim Greil, Dowl Jeff Walla, KLJ Mike Beckhoff, Dowl Scott Eaton, FAA John Smith, Laurel Steve Knopp, Stevensville Airport Craig Canfield, KLJ Tyler Reed, Morrison-Maierle Doug Phair, Miles City Airport Lance Bowser, RPA Travis Eickman, Morrison-Maierle Tony Dolphay, Havre City/County Airport Rick Donaldson, RPA Gerry Grabofsky, Havre City/County Airport Bob Breum, Havre City/County Airport Bruce Agrella, Polson Administrative Rule Changes – 8:00 a.m. Carol Grell Morris went over the rule making process and the changes in the rules that govern the way the board administers and governs grants. Tim Conway talked about the priority process for loans and grants. Carol Grell Morris went over the loan/grant close out form. Loan/Grant Allocations – 9:00 a.m. Big Sandy – Bill Burkland, RPA represented Big Sandy airport. Bill said this is a pavement rehabilitation project, nothing retroactive. FAA is good to go with this project. Bridger – No one was present for Bridger.
    [Show full text]
  • TSA -Screening Partnership Program FY 2015 1St Half
    Screening Partnership Program First Half, Fiscal Year 2015 June 19, 2015 Fiscal Year 2015 Report to Congress Transportation Security Administration Message from the Acting Administrator June 19, 2015 I am pleased to present the following report, “Screening Partnership Program,” for the first half of Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, prepared by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). TSA is submitting this report pursuant to language in the Joint Explanatory Statement accompanying the FY 2015 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act (P.L. 114-4). The report discusses TSA’s execution of the Screening Partnership Program (SPP) and the processing of SPP applications. Pursuant to congressional requirements, this report is being provided to the following Members of Congress: The Honorable John R. Carter Chairman, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security The Honorable Lucille Roybal-Allard Ranking Member, House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security The Honorable John Hoeven Chairman, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security The Honorable Jeanne Shaheen Ranking Member, Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security Inquiries relating to this report may be directed to me at (571) 227-2801 or to the Department’s Chief Financial Officer, Chip Fulghum, at (202) 447-5751. Sincerely yours, Francis X. Taylor Acting Administrator i Screening Partnership Program First Half, Fiscal Year 2015 Table of Contents I. Legislative Language .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Park County Hazard Mitigation Plan Final Draft
    PARK COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FINAL DRAFT PREPARED FOR Park County City of Livingston Tow n o f C l yd e Pa r k AUGUST 2018 respec.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Disasters can strike at any time in any place. In many cases, actions can be taken before disasters strike to reduce or eliminate the negative impacts. These actions, termed mitigation, often protect life, property, the economy, or other values. The Park County Hazard Mitigation Plan addresses sixteen major hazards with respect to risk and vulnerabilities countywide, including in the City of Livingston and the Town of Clyde Park. Through a collaborative planning process, the Park County hazards were identified, researched, and profiled. The major hazards are each profiled in terms of their description, history, probability and magnitude, vulnerabilities, and data limitations. The vulnerabilities to critical facilities, critical infrastructure, existing structures, the population, values, and future development are evaluated for each hazard. Based on the probability and extent of potential impacts identified in the risk assessment, the prioritizations of hazards within Park County are outlined in Table ES-6-1 through Table ES-6-3. Table ES-6-1. Park County Hazard Prioritizations Level Hazard High Hazard Flooding Wildfire Earthquake Hazardous Materials Release Wind Winter Storms and Extended Cold Moderate Hazard Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Communicable Disease and Bioterrorism Avalanche and Landslide Drought Low Hazard Utility Outage Volcano Terrorism, Civil Unrest, and Violence Aviation Accident Railroad Accident ES-1 Table ES-6-2. City of Livingston Hazard Prioritizations Level Hazard High Hazard Flooding Earthquake Hazardous Materials Release Wind Winter Storms and Extended Cold Moderate Hazard Communicable Disease and Bioterrorism Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Urban Fire Drought Utility Outage Low Hazard Ground Transportation Accident Wildfire Aviation Accident Terrorism, Civil Unrest, and Violence Railroad Accident Volcano Table ES-6-3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-01-26 Aeronautics Board Meeting Minutes
    January 26, 2012 Montana Aeronautics Board Helena, MT January 26, 2012 Aeronautics Board Department of Transportation Tricia McKenna, Board Chair Debbie Alke, MDT Aeronautics Rob Buckles Carol Grell Morris, MDT Legal Chuck Manning Jim Greil, MDT Aeronautics Ted Schye Patty Kautz, MDT Aeronautics Bill Hunt Wade Cebulski, MDT Aeronautics Fred Lark Don DeGraw, MDT Yellowstone Airport Roger Lincoln Chris Edwards Guests Rick Donaldson, Robert Peccia & Associates Mike Beckhoff, Stelling Engineers Tex Irwin, Ravalli County Airport Board Jeff Walla, Stelling Engineers Dave Hedditch, Ravalli County Airport Board Steve Knopp, Stevensville Airport Carl Seilstad, Fergus County Leo Thompson, Powder River County William Stewart, Hamilton Airport Scott Bell, Morrision-Maierle Judith Stewart, Hamilton Airport Kristie Brabeck, Valley County Airport Tim Orthmeyer, Morrison-Maierle David Beckett, Ravalli County Airport Jerry Moline, Lewistown Airport Ron Stoltz, Ravalli County Commission Judy Kline, Hamilton Airport Nigel Davis, Morrison-Maierle Bill Burkland, Robert Peccia & Associates Cassie Riggin, Morrison-Maierle Rick Newman, St. Ignatius Airport David Anderson, Cut Bank Airport Mauri Morin, Ronan Airport Don Misevic, Stevensville Craig Canfield, Kadrmas Lee & Jackson Steve Knopp, Stevensville Loan/Grant Allocations – 8:00 a.m. Chairman McKenna called the meeting to order. Baker – Craig Canfield with Kadrmas Lee & Jackson represented Baker airport. Craig said this is the second phase of a two year project, 1000’ runway extension that includes paving and electrical and expansion of apron. They are asking for a $60,000 grant. Chairman McKenna asked if they could take a loan. Craig said they are not interested in a loan. Big Timber – No one was present for Big Timber. Project is for Snow Removal Equipment Plow & Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Temperature Limit Reference Guide (2019 Edition)
    ENERGY STAR Single-Family New Homes, Version 3 / 3.1 ENERGY STAR Multifamily New Construction, Version 1 / 1.1 / OR-WA 1.2 Design Temperature Limit Reference Guide (2019 Edition) These 2019 Edition limits are permitted to be used with any National HVAC Design Report, and are required to be used for all National HVAC Design Reports generated on or after 10-01-2020 Introduction One requirement of the ENERGY STAR Single-Family New Homes and Multifamily New Construction (MFNC) programs is to use outdoor design temperatures that do not exceed the maximum cooling season temperature and minimum heating season temperature listed in this reference guide for the state and county, or territory, in which the home is to be certified. Only two exceptions apply: 1. Jurisdiction-Specified Temperatures: If the outdoor design temperatures to be used in load calculations are specified by the jurisdiction where the home will be certified, then these specified temperatures shall be used. 2. Temperature Exception Request: In rare cases, the designer may believe that an exception to the limits in the reference guide are warranted for a particular state and county, or territory. If so, the designer must complete and submit a Design Temperature Exception Request, including a justification for the exception, to [email protected] for review and approval prior to the home’s certification. To obtain the most accurate load calculations, EPA recommends that designers always use the ACCA Manual J, 8th edition, 1% cooling season design temperature and 99% heating season design temperature for the weather location that is geographically closest to the home to be certified.
    [Show full text]