Arxiv:2002.02611V3 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 24 Nov 2020 and Thus the VP Is Switched, As Shown in Fig.1(C)

Y. Su and S.-Z. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226401 (2020).

Current-induced reversal of anomalous Hall conductance in twisted bilayer graphene

Ying Su1 and Shi-Zeng Lin1 1Theoretical Division, T-4 and CNLS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA (Dated: November 25, 2020) It is observed experimentally that the sign of the Hall resistance can be flipped by a dc electric current in the twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) at 3/4 filling of the four-fold degenerate conduction flat bands. The experiment implies a switching of the valley polarization (VP) and topology in TBG. Here we present a theory on the current-induced switching of VP and topology. The presence of current in the bulk causes the redistribution of electron occupation in bands near the Fermi energy, which then deforms and shifts the band dispersion due to the Coulomb interaction. Above a critical current, the original occupied and empty bands can be swapped resulting in the switching of VP and topology.

Introduction.—The electronic band structure is modified ogy. significantly compared to that in a single layer graphene, when Toy model.—To facilitate the understanding of switching two layers of graphene are stacked together [1]. The band- of VP by electric currents, we use a simple toy model to width can be controlled by the misalignment angle between demonstrate the physical picture. Here we consider a two- two layers [2,3]. At certain twisted angles called magic an- band model described by the Hamiltonian gles, the energy bands near the Fermi surface are extremely X † X † † H = (εk,τ − λ∂kεk,τ)c ck,τ + V c ck ,+c ck ,−, flat [3], where the Coulomb interaction becomes dominant k,τ k1,+ 1 k2,− 2 over the kinetic energy of electrons. It is expected that novel k,τ k1,k2 quantum states enabled by the strong electronic correlation (1) will emerge. Indeed, the correlated insulating state and super- where τ = ± is the effective valley index labeling the two en- conductivity have been observed experimentally in the magic- ergy bands and V is the repulsive intervalley interaction. The angle twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) [4,5]. Furthermore, model has time-reversal symmetry (TRS), ε = ε . The the insulating state can have nontrivial topology which is k,τ −k,−τ current in the system can be introduced by the Lagrangian manifested by the intrinsic quantum anomalous Hall effect multiplier λ, which can be derived by considering a system (QAHE) [6,7]. The twisted multilayer graphene therefore be- with a threading magnetic flux [79]. It can also be understood comes an important platform to explore the physics of strong intuitively in terms of the semi-classical Boltzmann transport electronic correlation and topology [4–77]. theory [79]. The self-consistent mean-field Hamiltonian is P † The QAHE with orbital ferromagnetism was observed at HMF = Ek,τc ck,τ with Ek,τ = εk,τ − λ∂kεk,τ + ∆−τ and Pk,τ k,τ 3/4 filling of the upper flat bands in TBG recently [6,7]. In ∆τ = V k f (Ek,τ), where f (Ek,τ) is the Fermi distribution the absence of electronic interaction, the electronic bands of function. TBG have the four-fold degeneracy associated with the valley Consider the schematic band dispersions shown in Fig. and spin degrees of freedom. The strong electronic interaction 1(a). The band with valley + is above that with valley − as a in flat bands lifts the valley and spin degeneracy, that results consequence of the spontaneous symmetry breaking due to the in the valley-spin-polarized insulating state responsible for the intervalley interaction. The system is an insulator at half fill- QAHE at 3/4 filling [20, 58, 70–73]. The nontrivial topology ing. To introduce current, a fraction of electrons in the lower of the insulating state is characterized by the Chern number band must be pumped into the upper band. Because the elec- C = ±1, where the sign of Chern number depends on which tron self-energy depends on the electron occupation, the part valley is polarized. Remarkably, as demonstrated in experi- of − band with group velocity opposite to the current direction ments, the sign of Hall conductance can be flipped by a dc rises while the + band shifts downwards. The majority of the current, that indicates the switching of Chern number and val- + band can be below the − band above a critical current, as ley polarization (VP) [6,7]. Several theoretical pictures are shown in Fig.1(b). After removing the current, the system proposed to explain the experiments [7, 49, 78]. then relaxes into a state with + (−) band occupied (empty),

arXiv:2002.02611v3 [cond-mat.str-el] 24 Nov 2020 and thus the VP is switched, as shown in Fig.1(c). In this paper, we propose a mechanism of switching of VP To describe the phase transition associated with the switch- and Chern number in TBG by electric currents in the bulk. ing of VP, we introduce the VP order parameter δ = (∆ − The current causes the redistribution of the electron occupa- + ∆ )/2. Close to the transition temperature T when δ is small, tion in otherwise fully occupied or empty bands, which de- − c the Ginzburg-Landau free energy of the system can be ex- forms and shifts the band dispersion with respect to the Fermi panded as [79] energy EF due to the Coulomb interaction. Above a threshold current, the major part of the originally empty (occupied) 2 3 4 F = F0 + α1δ + α2δ + α3δ + α4δ . (2) band when current is absent is pushed below (above) EF . The bands then are swapped after relaxation when the current is Because both current and δ are odd under time reversal, it re- removed, that hence results in ﬂipping of the VP and topol- quires α1,3(λ) = −α1,3(−λ) and α2,3(λ) = α2,4(−λ). Under the 2

(a) (b) (c) EEE (a) (b) (c) 1 0 40

b’ b 10 ) s h

k k k / n n 2 K2 τ e & 0 0 (

θ τ ns (meV) xy

Г n E G K1 -10

(d) FF(e) (f) F -40 -1 -1

K1 ΓMK2 0 10 20 T(K)

δ δ δ

FIG. 2. (a) Schematic BZs of the TBG (black hexagon) and of two graphene layers (red and blue hexagons). (b) Low-energy band structure of the TBG along the high symmetry path. The solid and dashed energy bands are from the ± K valleys, respectively. The upper flat FIG. 1. (a)-(c) Schematic band structures for λ = 0, λ ≥ λc, and bands are marked by red color. (c) nτ (red solid line), ns (red dashed λ = 0, respectively. (d)-(f) Free energy profiles correspond to (a)-(c). line), and Hall conductance Gxy (blue solid line) are plotted as a func- The two energy bands are labeled by the effective valley index ±. (a) tion of the temperature T. and (c) represent the two degenerate ground states with opposite VP. (b) is obtained from (a) by introducing the current, and (c) is obtained from (b) by removing the current. The current induced pumping of Kl are the corners of Moire´ Brouillon zone (BZ) as shown in electrons from the lower band to the upper band is indicated by the Fig.2(a). The interlayer coupling is described by arrow and is highlighted in (a). The switching of VP and vanishing of energy barrier in the presence of current is exhibited in (e). (0) −iτb·r (1) −iτb0·r (2) Tτ(r) = Tτ + e Tτ + e Tτ , ! ! (5) (n) 2πn 2πn Tτ = wAAσ0 + wAB cos σx + τwAB sin σy, inversion operation within each valley Γˆ v, i.e. εk,τ → ε−k,τ, δ is 3 3 even while the current is odd. If the system has the symmetry where b (b0) are the primitive reciprocal lattice vectors of the associated with Γˆ v, then α1,3(λ) = α1,3(−λ), which immedi- TBG [see Fig.2(a)]. Due to the lattice relaxation, the in- ately implies α1,3(λ) = 0. Therefore this intravalley inversion terlayer tunneling strength is different for the AA and AB symmetry must be broken, i.e. εk,τ , ε−k,τ, in order to switch the valley polarization by current. stacking regions, where wAA = 79.7 meV and wAB = 97.5 It is clear from Eq. (2) that the system has two degener- meV [13]. The Fermi velocity is ~vF /a = 2.1354 eV where ate ground states with opposite VP, which are separated by a = 0.246 nm is the lattice constant of single layer graphene. Hk,± of the ±K valleys are related by TRS. In the experiments, an energy barrier, as shown in Figs.1(d) and1(f). The pres- ◦ ence of current lifts the degeneracy by increasing the energy the TBG with θ = 1.15 is aligned with a hBN substrate [6,7] of one valley-polarized state and reducing the energy of the that induces a sublattice potential onto the first layer graphene other one, as shown in Fig.1(e). Above a critical current, the as h1,τ → h1,τ + ∆ABσz/2 through the interlayer coupling. We energy barrier vanishes. The VP of the system is switched if it choose the sublattice potential ∆AB = 20 meV in this study. is initiated at a state, that becomes unstable under the current The Hamiltonian Eq. (3) is expressed in the real space repre- [see Fig.1(e)]. On the other hand, if the system sits in the sentation with k = −i∇r being the momentum operator. Under other state that remains the energy minimal under the current, the plane wave expansion and truncation of reciprocal space there is no switching of VP. Thus the switching of VP depends to the fourth shell, the low-energy bands of the TBG are well on the direction of current. converged and shown in Fig.2(b), where the energy bands TBG.—We then apply our physical picture to TBG with a from the ±K valley are represented by solid and dashed lines, respectively. There are eight flat bands including the degener- small twist angle. In TBG, no symmetry guarantees εk,τ = ate spin degree of freedom around charge neutrality. The lat- ε−k,τ and therefore it is possible to switch the VP by electric currents. We employ the continuum model Hamiltonian [3] tice relaxation isolates the flat bands from remote bands and the substrate-induced sublattice potential gaps the upper flat ! h1,τ(k) Tτ(r) bands from the lower flat bands by breaking the C2T symme- Hk,τ = † , (3) Tτ (r) h2,τ(k) try that enables the nonzero valley Chern number [12]. Here C and T denote the two-fold rotation and time-reversal sym- where τ = ± is the valley index and h (k) is the low-energy 2 l,τ metries, respectively. effective Dirac Hamiltonian of the l-th layer graphene. Under Here we focus on the 3/4 filling of the upper flat bands [the the twist that the first (second) layer is rotated by θ/2 (−θ/2), red bands in Fig.2(b)], where the QAHE emerges [6,7]. By the Dirac Hamiltonian becomes projecting the Coulomb interaction onto the upper flat bands, −1 hl,τ(k) = R(±τθ/2)~vF (k − τKl) · στR(±τθ/2) , (4) the Hamiltonian of TBG becomes X X −iθσz/2 † 1 where R(θ) = e is the rotation operator and στ = H = ε − µ c c + ρ(q)V(q)ρ(−q), (6) 0 k,τ k,τ,s k,τ,s 2A (τσx, σy) is the Pauli matrix for sublattice degree of freedom. k,τ,s q 3 where εk,τ denotes the spin-degenerate bare dispersion for 0.3 (+,↑) C=−10.3 (+,↓) C=−1 the upper flat bands given by Hk,τ |ψk,τi = εk,τ |ψk,τi, µ 3 is the chemical potential, and A is the area of the system. ) ) -1 -1 0.0 0.0 s =↑ or ↓ represents the spin degree of freedom. ρ(q) = (nm (nm y y P · † k k iq r 0 0 k,k0,τ,s hψk,τ|e |ψk ,τi ck,τ,sck ,τ,s is the density operator, and V(q) = e2 tanh(|q|d)/2|q| is the screened Coulomb potential, 0 where is the dielectric constant and d is the distance between -0.3 −0.3 -0.3 0.0 0.3 −0.3 0.0 0.3 -1 -1 TBG and metallic gates. Here we take d = 40 nm following kx (nm ) kx (nm ) (meV) the experiment [7]. E 0.3 (−,↑) C=10.3 (−,↓) C=1 With the self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation, the -3 dispersion of the upper flat bands are corrected by the ) ) -1 -1 Coulomb interaction as 0.0 0.0 (nm (nm y y k k

Ek,τ,s = εk,τ − µ -6

1 X iq·r −iq·r + hψk,τ|e |ψk,τi V(q) hψk0,τ0 |e |ψk0,τ0 i f (Ek0,τ0,s0 ) −0.3 −0.3 A 0 0 0 −0.3 0.0 0.3 −0.3 0.0 0.3 q,k ,τ ,s . -1 -1 kx (nm ) kx (nm ) 1 X iq·r −iq·r − hψ |e |ψ 0 i V(q) hψ 0 |e |ψ i f (E 0 ) A k,τ k ,τ k ,τ k,τ k ,τ,s q,k0 FIG. 3. The four upper fat bands labeled by the valley-spin in- (7) dex (τ, s) are shown for the insulating valley-spin-polarized state obtained from the Hatree-Fock approximation. The Chern numbers of By solving the self-consistent equation, we get four degener- the flat bands are displayed. The black hexagon encloses the moire´ ate valley-spin-polarized ground states at 3/4 filling. In the BZ. ground states, one of the four flat bands is above the other three that results in an insulating state when µ is tuned to be inside the gap. The experimentally measured energy gap is number, and B represents the perpendicular magnetic field. ∆/kB ≈ 27K [7], that can be reproduced by our approach Mk,τ is the k-resolved orbital magnetization with = 58.60, where 0 is the vacuum permittivity. The e energy gap depends on the gate distance d. As d decreases, Mk,τ = i ∇kψk,τ × (2µ0 − εk,τ − Hk,τ) ∇kψk,τ · eˆz, (9) the screening of the Coulomb interaction is enhanced and the 2~ energy gap is reduced [79]. P P that is generated by the self rotation of Bloch states and in- We define n = (n − n− ) and n = (n ↑ − n ↓) τ s +,s ,s s τ τ, τ, cludes also the boundary contribution [81–84]. Here µ0 is to characterize the valley and spin polarization, respectively. the chemical potential corresponding to the 3/4 filling of the n is the occupation number of the flat band with the valley- τ,s bare dispersion, and eˆz is a unit vector perpendicular to TBG. spin indices (τ, s). We consider a symmetry-breaking state The orbital magnetic moment is spin-degenerate and valley- with nτ = −ns = 1 at zero temperature, as shown in Fig.3. contrasting. Thus the symmetry breaking state at 3/4 filling The four flat bands have nonzero Chern numbers C = ±1, has the polarized orbital magnetic moment, and exhibits or- which are opposite for ±K valleys as a consequence of TRS. bital ferromegnetism. To be concrete, we focus on the cur- Therefore, the VP at 3/4 filling ensures the QAHE, which is rent along the x direction and take the valley-spin-polarized 2 manifested by the quantized Hall conductance Gxy = ±e /h as ground state in Fig.3 as the initial state. Because the flat bands observed in experiments [7]. Because the Hamiltonian Eq. (6) with spin down are fully filled, the current can only be con- has the spin SU(2) symmetry and valley U(1) symmetry, the ducted by the spin up bands. Hence we fix λ↓ = 0 in the fol- long-range spin order is destroyed by thermal fluctuations ac- lowing. In this case, the Hatree-Fock approximation yields the cording to the Mermin-Wagner theorem, while the long-range self-consistent equation in the same form as Eq. (7) but with valley order is allowed [80]. As temperature increases, the the replacement εk,τ → εk,τ − λs∂kx εk,τ − gµB szB − Mk,τB. mean field nτ, ns, and Gxy vanish together above a critical We first focus on the effect of current on VP and Hall con- temperature Tc = 14.1K, as shown in Fig.2(c). Above Tc, ductance in the absence of magnetic field B = 0. The analysis the system becomes a simple metal. in Eq. (2) reveals that the switching of VP by currents is of We then study the effect of current and magnetic field on the first order phase transition, and therefore hysteresis is ex- the electron dispersion. The current is introduced through the pected. We sweep the current by changing λ continuously and Lagrange multiplier as before and the Hamiltonian becomes solve the corresponding self-consistent equations. The current X e P ∂εk,τ † density through the TBG is J = k,τ,s f (Ek,τ,s), where H = H − λ ∂ ε + gµ s B + M B c c , (8) Ah ~∂kx 0 s kα k,τ B z k,τ k,τ,s k,τ,s h = 0.6 nm is the thickness of TBG. In Fig.4(a), we show k,τ,s that J increases monontonically with λ. The results of nτ, ns, where λs denotes the Lagrange multiplier for the current with and Gxy at T = 13K as a function of J are displayed in Figs. spin s and along the α direction, sz = ±1/2 is the spin quantum 4(b) and4(c), where the hysteretic behavior of VP and Hall 4

(a)3×10 6 (b) 0.6 nτ T. The dependence of λc and Jc on T are shown in Fig.4(d). ns As can be derived from Eq. (2), we have the following scaling )

2 √ s 2 n 6 relations F ∼ (T − T) , δ ∼ T − T, and α ∼ λ. Therefore 0×10 & 0.0 c c 3

τ √ (A/cm n

J J λc ∼ Tc − T consistent with the numerical results shown in the inset of Fig.4(d). -0.6 -3×10 6 -0.4 0.0 0.4 -3×10 6 0.0×10 6 3×10 6 The energy barrier is aﬀected by the magnetic ﬁeld through λ(nm) J (A/cm2) the Zeeman coupling with spin and orbital magnetic moments (c) 0.6 (d)3×10 6 in Eq. (8). In TBG, the orbital magnetic moment is dominant and is valley-contrasting. The energy gap of the insulating ) 6 2 ) 2×10 h /

2 0.2

e valley-spin-polarized state scales linearly with B. To study

( 0.0

c (A/cm λ xy 0.1 c G J 1×10 6 the dependence of critical current Ic on B, we show Gxy as a 0.0 0 3 function of current I for different B at T = 13K in Fig.5. The √ Tc−T -0.6 0×10 6 switching of VP and topology at I is featured by the jump of -3×10 6 0.0×10 6 3×10 6 0 7 14 c 2 T(K) J (A/cm ) Gxy where Gxy changes sign. Ic as a function of B indicated by the black line in Fig.5 is extracted from Ref. [7]. Both the experimental result and our numerical simulation show a FIG. 4. (a) Current density J as a function of λ at T = 13K. (b) and linear dependence of Ic on B. (c) The corresponding order parameters nτ,s and Hall conductance Discussion and summary.—Here we compare our theory to Gxy as a function of J. (d) The dependence√ of critical current density Jc on T. The inset shows λc vs Tc − T. the other proposals [7, 49, 78]. In Ref. [7], the authors at- tributed the switching of VP due to the chiral edge current, where the asymmetric edges tilt the free energy difference for conductance appears as expected. Start with the initial state in two otherwise degenerate VP states. However, the switching 2 Fig.3 with nτ ≈ 0.6 and Gxy ≈ −0.6e /h (here nτ and Gxy are of the VP requires overcoming the bulk energy barrier. For a not saturated because of the nonzero T.), and then increase large system size with a single domain, the edge contribution J, both nτ and Gxy change sign through a sharp jump at the is not enough to overcome the bulk energy barrier [79]. One critical current density Jc (and the corresponding λc). If we may argue that the switching involves multiple domains. In remove the current (by setting λ = 0) after the jump, the sys- this picture, the domain walls must percolate the whole system tem then relaxes into an insulating state with opposite nτ and in order to conduct current. In Ref. [49], He et al. argued that Gxy. There is no switching of spin polarization because the strain due to the substrate can break the C3 symmetry down bands with down spin remain fully occupied. Therefore, our to C1 symmetry. The magnetoelectric effect then can allow to results demonstrate that the VP and topology can be switched change the magnetization by electric field, and switch the VP. by a current larger than Jc. The results for T = 0 are presented This requires an electric field throughout the system and finite in Ref. [79]. quasiparticle lifetime, and therefore does not apply directly to the QAHE states. In Ref. [78], the authors considered do- Here λc and Jc are determined by the energy barrier sep- arating different valley-polarized states. As T increases, the main walls between different VP. They argued that the electric current can couple to the domain wall described by the valley energy barrier decreases, and hence λc and Jc decreases with pseudospin and drive the domain wall into motion. The motion of domain wall results in the expansion of domains with 20 1 one VP at the expense of the domains with the opposite VP, and eventually flips the VP. In our approach, we highlight the effect of the bulk current.

) A bulk current in the QAHE state is possible either due to h / 2 e

(T) 0 thermally activated quasiparticle or when the electric ﬁeld ex-

0 (

B xy

G ceeds a threshold value determined by the gap [79]. Our sce- nario can be tested experimentally by studying devices with a single domain. The single domain state can be prepared

-20 -1 by polarizing the devices with external magnetic field at low -20 0 20 temperature [7]. One then measures the longitudinal current- I – I (B=0) (nA) c voltage curve and the corresponding Hall conductance, and compares to the theoretical prediction in Fig.4. Our theory can be generalized to the multiple domains FIG. 5. Density plot of the Hall conductance Gxy as a function of current I and magnetic field B. The positive and negative Gxy are case. The mechanism proposed here offers a way to change for opposite valley polarization. The black line is the phase bound- the energy for different VP domains by current, which facil- ary extracted from Ref. [7] that separates different valley-polarized itates the nucleation of the energetically favored VP in the states. Here we offset I by the critical current Ic at B = 0 to make a presence of fluctuations. Therefore, the threshold switch- direct comparison of the phase boundaries. ing current identified for a single domain when the energy 5 barrier vanishes completely corresponds to the superheat- [9] Kyounghwan Kim, Ashley DaSilva, Shengqiang Huang, Babak ing/supercooling field. Fallahazad, Stefano Larentis, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watan- abe, Brian J. LeRoy, Allan H. MacDonald, and Emanuel Tutuc, In summary, we propose a mechanism of the switching “Tunable moire´ bands and strong correlations in small-twist- of VP and topology in TBG by bulk electric currents. The angle bilayer graphene,” PNAS 114, 3364–3369 (2017). current causes the redistribution of electron occupation, that [10] Shengqiang Huang, Kyounghwan Kim, Dmitry K. Efimkin, lifts the degeneracy and even overcomes the energy bar- Timothy Lovorn, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Allan H. rier between different valley-spin-polarized states through the MacDonald, Emanuel Tutuc, and Brian J. LeRoy, “Topo- Coulomb interaction. Our theory can be generalized to other logically protected helical states in minimally twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 037702 (2018). strongly correlated two dimensional materials with valley po- [11] Cenke Xu and Leon Balents, “Topological superconductivity larization. in twisted multilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 087001 Acknowledgements.—The authors thank Fengcheng Wu (2018). and Di Xiao for helpful discussion. Computer resources for [12] Hoi Chun Po, Liujun Zou, Ashvin Vishwanath, and T. Senthil, numerical calculations were supported by the Institutional “Origin of mott insulating behavior and superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031089 (2018). Computing Program at LANL. This work was carried out [13] Mikito Koshino, Noah F. Q. Yuan, Takashi Koretsune, under the auspices of the U.S. DOE NNSA under contract Masayuki Ochi, Kazuhiko Kuroki, and Liang Fu, “Maximally No. 89233218CNA000001 through the LDRD Program, and localized wannier orbitals and the extended hubbard model for was supported by the Center for Nonlinear Studies at LANL twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018). and Institute for Materials Science (IMS) at LANL through [14] Jian Kang and Oskar Vafek, “Symmetry, maximally localized IMS Rapid Response. S. Z. L. was also supported by the wannier states, and a low-energy model for twisted bilayer U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy graphene narrow bands,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031088 (2018). [15] Cheng-Cheng Liu, Li-Da Zhang, Wei-Qiang Chen, and Fan Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Con- Yang, “Chiral spin density wave and d + id superconductivity densed Matter Theory Program. in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018). [16] J. F. Dodaro, S. A. Kivelson, Y. Schattner, X. Q. Sun, and C. Wang, “Phases of a phenomenological model of twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 075154 (2018). [1] A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, [17] Hiroki Isobe, Noah F. Q. Yuan, and Liang Fu, “Unconven- and A. K. Geim, “The electronic properties of graphene,” Rev. tional superconductivity and density waves in twisted bilayer Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009). graphene,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 041041 (2018). [2] J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Cas- [18] Louk Rademaker and Paula Mellado, “Charge-transfer insu- tro Neto, “Graphene bilayer with a twist: Electronic structure,” lation in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 235158 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007). (2018). [3] Rafi Bistritzer and Allan H. MacDonald, “Moire´ bands in [19] Francisco Guinea and Niels R Walet, “Electrostatic effects, twisted double-layer graphene,” PNAS 108, 12233–12237 band distortions, and superconductivity in twisted graphene bi- (2011). layers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, [4] Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Ahmet Demir, Shiang Fang, 13174–13179 (2018). Spencer L. Tomarken, Jason Y. Luo, Javier D. Sanchez- [20] Ming Xie and A. H. MacDonald, “Nature of the correlated in- Yamagishi, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios sulator states in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, Kaxiras, Ray C. Ashoori, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Corre- 097601 (2020). lated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene [21] Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, Hryhoriy Polshyn, Yux- superlattices,” Nature 556, 80–84 (2018). uan Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, David Graf, Andrea F. [5] Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Shiang Fang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Young, and Cory R. Dean, “Tuning superconductivity in Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Un- twisted bilayer graphene,” Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019). conventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene super- [22] Alexander Kerelsky, Leo J McGilly, Dante M Kennes, Lede lattices,” Nature 556, 43–50 (2018). Xian, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, K Watanabe, [6] Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Arthur W. Barnard, Joe Finney, T Taniguchi, James Hone, Cory Dean, et al., “Maximized Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer David Goldhaber-Gordon, “Emergent ferromagnetism near graphene,” Nature 572, 95–100 (2019). three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene,” Science 365, [23] Yuan Cao, Debanjan Chowdhury, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, 605–608 (2019). Oriol Rubies-Bigorda, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, [7] M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, T. Senthil, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Strange metal in magic- K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, “In- angle graphene with near planckian dissipation,” Phys. Rev. trinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moire´ heterostruc- Lett. 124, 076801 (2020). ture,” Science (2019), 10.1126/science.aay5533. [24] Hryhoriy Polshyn, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, Yux- [8] Xiaobo Lu, Petr Stepanov, Wei Yang, Ming Xie, Mo- uan Zhang, K Watanabe, T Taniguchi, Cory R Dean, and hammed Ali Aamir, Ipsita Das, Carles Urgell, Kenji Watanabe, Andrea F Young, “Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in Takashi Taniguchi, Guangyu Zhang, Adrian Bachtold, Allan H. twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics 15, 1011–1016 MacDonald, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Superconductors, orbital (2019). magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene,” [25] Guorui Chen, Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Ya-Hui Zhang, Nature 574, 653–657 (2019). Shaoxin Wang, Lili Jiang, Bosai Lyu, Hongyuan Li, Kenji 6

Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zhiwen Shi, T. Senthil, David [39] Aline Ramires and Jose L. Lado, “Electrically tunable gauge Goldhaber-Gordon, Yuanbo Zhang, and Feng Wang, “Tunable fields in tiny-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. correlated chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moire´ super- 121, 146801 (2018). lattice,” Nature 579, 56–61 (2020). [40] Grigory Tarnopolsky, Alex Jura Kruchkov, and Ashvin Vish- [26] Emilio Codecido, Qiyue Wang, Ryan Koester, Shi Che, wanath, “Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene,” Haidong Tian, Rui Lv, Son Tran, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019). Taniguchi, Fan Zhang, Marc Bockrath, and Chun Ning [41] Junyeong Ahn, Sungjoon Park, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Fail- Lau, “Correlated insulating and superconducting states ure of nielsen-ninomiya theorem and fragile topology in two- in twisted bilayer graphene below the magic angle,” dimensional systems with space-time inversion symmetry: Ap- Science Advances 5 (2019), 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9770, plication to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle,” Phys. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/9/eaaw9770.full.pdf. Rev. X 9, 021013 (2019). [27] Yonglong Xie, Biao Lian, Berthold Jack,¨ Xiaomeng Liu, [42] Zhida Song, Zhijun Wang, Wujun Shi, Gang Li, Chen Fang, Cheng-Li Chiu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B Andrei and B. Andrei Bernevig, “All magic angles in twisted bilayer Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Spectroscopic signatures of many- graphene are topological,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 036401 (2019). body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” [43] Kasra Hejazi, Chunxiao Liu, Hassan Shapourian, Xiao Chen, Nature 572, 101–105 (2019). and Leon Balents, “Multiple topological transitions in twisted [28] Yuhang Jiang, Xinyuan Lai, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi bilayer graphene near the first magic angle,” Phys. Rev. B 99, Taniguchi, Kristjan Haule, Jinhai Mao, and Eva Y Andrei, 035111 (2019). “Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle [44] Yury Sherkunov and Joseph J. Betouras, “Electronic phases in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 573, 91–95 (2019). twisted bilayer graphene at magic angles as a result of van hove [29] Youngjoon Choi, Jeannette Kemmer, Yang Peng, Alex Thom- singularities and interactions,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 205151 (2018). son, Harpreet Arora, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, Hechen Ren, [45] Jian Kang and Oskar Vafek, “Strong coupling phases of par- Jason Alicea, Gil Refael, et al., “Electronic correlations in tially filled twisted bilayer graphene narrow bands,” Phys. Rev. twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle,” Nature Physics Lett. 122, 246401 (2019). 15, 1174–1180 (2019). [46] Kangjun Seo, Valeri N. Kotov, and Bruno Uchoa, “Ferromag- [30] Xiaobo Lu, Petr Stepanov, Wei Yang, Ming Xie, Mo- netic mott state in twisted graphene bilayers at the magic angle,” hammed Ali Aamir, Ipsita Das, Carles Urgell, Kenji Watan- Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246402 (2019). abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Guangyu Zhang, et al., “Superconduc- [47] Yu-Ping Lin and Rahul M. Nandkishore, “Chiral twist on the tors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bi- high-Tc phase diagram in moire´ heterostructures,” Phys. Rev. B layer graphene,” Nature 574, 653–657 (2019). 100, 085136 (2019). [31] S. L. Tomarken, Y. Cao, A. Demir, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, [48] Teemu J. Peltonen, Risto Ojajarvi,¨ and Tero T. Heikkila,¨ P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. C. Ashoori, “Electronic compress- “Mean-field theory for superconductivity in twisted bilayer ibility of magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 220504 (2018). 123, 046601 (2019). [49] Wen-Yu He, David Goldhaber-Gordon, and Kam Tuen Law, [32] Cheng Shen, Yanbang Chu, QuanSheng Wu, Na Li, Shuopei “Giant orbital magnetoelectric effect and current-induced mag- Wang, Yanchong Zhao, Jian Tang, Jieying Liu, Jinpeng Tian, netization switching in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature com- Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Rong Yang, Zi Yang munications 11, 1650 (2020). Meng, Dongxia Shi, Oleg V. Yazyev, and Guangyu Zhang, [50] Biao Lian, Zhijun Wang, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Twisted bi- “Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene,” Nature layer graphene: A phonon-driven superconductor,” Phys. Rev. Physics 16, 520–525 (2020). Lett. 122, 257002 (2019). [33] Xiaomeng Liu, Zeyu Hao, Eslam Khalaf, Jong Yeon Lee, Yuval [51] Young Woo Choi and Hyoung Joon Choi, “Strong electron- Ronen, Hyobin Yoo, Danial Haei Najafabadi, Kenji Watanabe, phonon coupling, electron-hole asymmetry, and nonadiabatic- Takashi Taniguchi, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Philip Kim, “Tun- ity in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 98, able spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer 241412 (2018). graphene,” Nature 583, 221–225 (2020). [52] Fengcheng Wu, A. H. MacDonald, and Ivar Martin, “The- [34] Yuan Cao, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Oriol Rubies-Bigorda, ory of phonon-mediated superconductivity in twisted bilayer Jeong Min Park, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Pablo graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 257001 (2018). Jarillo-Herrero, “Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized [53] Shubhayu Chatterjee, Nick Bultinck, and Michael P. Zaletel, phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene,” Nature 583, 215– “Symmetry breaking and skyrmionic transport in twisted bi- 220 (2020). layer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 165141 (2020). [35] Yi-Zhuang You and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Superconductivity [54] Fengcheng Wu, Euyheon Hwang, and Sankar Das Sarma, from valley fluctuations and approximate so (4) symmetry in “Phonon-induced giant linear-in-t resistivity in magic angle a weak coupling theory of twisted bilayer graphene,” npj Quan- twisted bilayer graphene: Ordinary strangeness and exotic su- tum Materials 4, 1–12 (2019). perconductivity,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 165112 (2019). [36] Qing-Kun Tang, Lin Yang, Da Wang, Fu-Chun Zhang, and [55] Fengcheng Wu, “Topological chiral superconductivity with Qiang-Hua Wang, “Spin-triplet f -wave pairing in twisted bi- spontaneous vortices and supercurrent in twisted bilayer 1 layer graphene near 4 -filling,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 094521 (2019). graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 195114 (2019). [37] J. Gonzalez´ and T. Stauber, “Kohn-luttinger superconductiv- [56] Fengcheng Wu and Sankar Das Sarma, “Identification of super- ity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 026801 conducting pairing symmetry in twisted bilayer graphene using (2019). in-plane magnetic field and strain,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 220507 [38] Ying Su and Shi-Zeng Lin, “Pairing symmetry and spon- (2019). taneous vortex-antivortex lattice in superconducting twisted- [57] Fengcheng Wu and Sankar Das Sarma, “Ferromagnetism and bilayer graphene: Bogoliubov-de gennes approach,” Phys. Rev. superconductivity in twisted double bilayer graphene,” Phys. B 98, 195101 (2018). Rev. B 101, 155149 (2020). 7

[58] Ya-Hui Zhang, Dan Mao, Yuan Cao, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, and “Mechanism for anomalous hall ferromagnetism in twisted bi- T. Senthil, “Nearly flat chern bands in moire´ superlattices,” layer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166601 (2020). Phys. Rev. B 99, 075127 (2019). [72] Jianpeng Liu, Zhen Ma, Jinhua Gao, and Xi Dai, “Quantum [59] Bheema Lingam Chittari, Guorui Chen, Yuanbo Zhang, Feng valley hall effect, orbital magnetism, and anomalous hall ef- Wang, and Jeil Jung, “Gate-tunable topological flat bands in fect in twisted multilayer graphene systems,” Phys. Rev. X 9, trilayer graphene boron-nitride moire´ superlattices,” Phys. Rev. 031021 (2019). Lett. 122, 016401 (2019). [73] Fengcheng Wu and Sankar Das Sarma, “Collective excitations [60] Jong Yeon Lee, Eslam Khalaf, Shang Liu, Xiaomeng Liu, Zeyu of quantum anomalous hall ferromagnets in twisted bilayer Hao, Philip Kim, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Theory of corre- graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 046403 (2020). lated insulating behaviour and spin-triplet superconductivity in [74] Manato Fujimoto, Henri Koschke, and Mikito Koshino, “Topo- twisted double bilayer graphene,” Nature communications 10, logical charge pumping by a sliding moire´ pattern,” Phys. Rev. 1–10 (2019). B 101, 041112 (2020). [61] Xiao-Chuan Wu, Anna Keselman, Chao-Ming Jian, Kelly Ann [75] Ying Su and Shi-Zeng Lin, “Topological sliding moire´ het- Pawlak, and Cenke Xu, “Ferromagnetism and spin-valley liq- erostructure,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 041113 (2020). uid states in moire´ correlated insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 100, [76] Yinhan Zhang, Yang Gao, and Di Xiao, “Topological charge 024421 (2019). pumping in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 101, [62] Tamaghna Hazra, Nishchhal Verma, and Mohit Randeria, 041410 (2020). “Bounds on the superconducting transition temperature: Ap- [77] Jihang Zhu, Jung-Jung Su, and Allan H MacDonald, “The cu- plications to twisted bilayer graphene and cold atoms,” Phys. rious magnetic properties of orbital chern insulators,” (2020), Rev. X 9, 031049 (2019). arXiv:2001.05084 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. [63] Fang Xie, Zhida Song, Biao Lian, and B. Andrei Bernevig, [78] Chunli Huang, Nemin Wei, and Allan MacDoanld, “Current “Topology-bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer Driven Magnetization Reversal in Orbital Chern Insulators,” graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167002 (2020). arXiv:2007.05990 [cond-mat] (2020), arXiv: 2007.05990. [64] A. Julku, T. J. Peltonen, L. Liang, T. T. Heikkila,¨ and P. Torm¨ a,¨ [79] See Supplemental Material for (a) the derivation of Lagrangian “Superfluid weight and berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless transi- multiplier for current, (b) the explicit calculation of the toy tion temperature of twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 101, model, (c) the dependence on the gate distance, (d) the switch- 060505 (2020). ing of valley polarization at zero temperature, and (e) estimate [65] Xiang Hu, Timo Hyart, Dmitry I. Pikulin, and Enrico Rossi, the edge current contribution in overcoming the energy barrier, “Geometric and conventional contribution to the superfluid which includes Refs. [85, 86]. weight in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, [80] N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, “Absence of ferromagnetism 237002 (2019). or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic [66] Jianpeng Liu and Xi Dai, “Anomalous hall effect, magneto- heisenberg models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136 (1966). optical properties, and nonlinear optical properties of twisted [81] Ming-Che Chang and Qian Niu, “Berry phase, hyperorbits, and graphene systems,” npj Computational Materials 6, 57 (2020). the hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in magnetic [67] Yu Saito, Jingyuan Ge, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, bloch bands,” Phys. Rev. B 53, 7010–7023 (1996). and Andrea F. Young, “Independent superconductors and cor- [82] Di Xiao, Junren Shi, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase correction to related insulators in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics electron density of states in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 16, 926–930 (2020). (2005). [68] Ya-Ning Ren, Chen Lu, Yu Zhang, Si-Yu Li, Yi-Wen Liu, Chao [83] Davide Ceresoli, T. Thonhauser, David Vanderbilt, and Yan, Zi-Han Guo, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Fan Yang, and Lin He, R. Resta, “Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi- “Spectroscopic evidence for a spin- and valley-polarized metal- band insulators, chern insulators, and metals,” Phys. Rev. B 74, lic state in a nonmagic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” ACS 024408 (2006). Nano (2020), 10.1021/acsnano.0c04631. [84] Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase ef- [69] Si-Yu Li, Yu Zhang, Ya-Ning Ren, Jianpeng Liu, Xi Dai, fects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 and Lin He, “Experimental evidence for orbital magnetic mo- (2010). ments generated by moire-scale´ current loops in twisted bilayer [85] G Grosso and G Pastori Parravicini, Solid State Physics (Aca- graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 121406 (2020). demic Press, London, 2000). [70] Ya-Hui Zhang, Dan Mao, and T. Senthil, “Twisted bilayer [86] F. D. M. Haldane, “Model for a quantum hall effect with- graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anomalous out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity hall effect and a lattice model,” Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033126 anomaly”,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015–2018 (1988) (2019). [71] Nick Bultinck, Shubhayu Chatterjee, and Michael P. Zaletel, 1

Supplemental Material: Switching of valley polarization and topology in twisted bilayer graphene by electric currents

I. Lagrangian multiplier for current (a)3 (b) 0.6

2 The simplest way to derive the Lagrangian multiplier term Δ+ J Δ 0.0 Δ− in Eq. (1) in the main text is considering a torus geometry 1 with a threading magnetic flux. The torus geometry preserves the translational invariance in both directions and the momen- 0 -0.6 -3 0 3 -3 0 3 tum is a good quantum number. The magnetic flux generates λ λ a current. The flux can be introduced into the Hamiltonian (c) (d) 0.6 through the standard Peierls substitution k → k+eA/~. The 4 single particle Hamiltonian becomes Δ+ J Δ 0.0 2 Δ− " # † eA ∂εk † H0 = ε(k+eA/~)c ck ≈ ε(k)+ c ck, (S1) k ~ ∂k k 0 -0.6 -5 0 5 -5 0 5 λ λ which has the same form as the Lagrangian multiplier term in the main text. The corresponding current is given by

J = −∂H/∂A. In the absence of dissipation, a stationary FIG. S1. (a) and (c) ∆± as a function of λ for V = 3 and 5. The current can be induced by a static flux. When dissipation is corresponding current J are shown in (b) and (d), respectively. present, a time dependent flux is required to generated a stationary current. The current dissipates over a time scale asso- system first becomes a metal, and then switches the VP upon ciated with the quasiparticle lifetime t0. Heuristically, we can further increasing λ, see Figs. S1(c) and S1(d). take A = Eet0, where Ee is the electric field. Therefore, the The free energy of the system is Lagrangian multiplier in Eq. (1) is λ = −et0Ee/~. The meaning of the Lagrangian multiplier can also be un- X ∆ ∆ F = −k T ln 1 + exp(−E /k T) − + − . (S4) derstood intuitively using the the Boltzmann transport equa- B k,τ B V tion k,τ When the VP order parameter δ = (∆ −∆ )/2 is small, we can ∂ f ∂ f ∂ f f − f0 + − + · v + · (−e)Ee = − , (S2) expand F in terms of δ as shown in Eq. (2). The coefficients ∂t ∂r ~∂k t0 are under the relaxation time approximation [S1]. Here f is the 0 X ρ2 Fermi-Dirac function and f is the distribution function in the F = −k T ln 1 + exp[−(ε − λ∂ ε + ρ)/k T] − , 0 B k,τ k k,τ B V presence of the bias voltage. For an uniform electric field Ee, k,τ the distribution function in the stationary state becomes (S5) ! et0 ∂ f0(εk) ∂εk et0 ∂εk X τ f (εk) = f0(εk)+ · Ee ≈ f0 εk + · Ee . α = − , (S6) ~ ∂εk ∂k ~ ∂k 1 1 + exp(g) (S3) k,τ Then we can identify the Lagrangian multiplier as λ = −et0Ee/~, that is consistent with the derivation above. 1 X 1 1 α = − + , (S7) 2 2 2k T + 2k T cosh(g) V k,τ B B II. Explicit calculation of the toy model 1 X 2τcsch3(g) sinh4(g/2) α = − , (S8) Here we provide explicit calculation of the toy model using 3 6 2 2 k,τ kBT the dispersion relation εk,− = cos(2k + π) − µ for −π ≤ k ≤ 2 −π/2 and εk,− = cos[ 3 (k + π/2)] − µ for −π/2 ≤ k ≤ π, and ε = ε . The results for ∆ and current J as a function of 1 X [−2 + cosh(g)]sech4(g/2) k,+ −k,− ± α = − , (S9) λ are displayed in Fig. S1. The switching of VP occurs only 4 24 3 3 k,τ 8kBT for a positive λ because we start with the initial state shown in Fig. 1(a). For V = 3 and µ = 1.5, the switching of VP with ρ = (∆+ + ∆−)/2 and g = (εk,τ − λ∂kεk,τ + ρ)/kBT. In (featured by the crossing of ∆±) happens simultaneously with the absence of current λ = 0, α1 = α3 = 0 as required by the the insulator-to-metal transition, as shown in Figs. S1(a) and Z2 symmetry associated with the VP. One can show explicitly S1(b). When the gap is increased by choosing V = 5, the that α1,3(λ) = −α1,3(−λ) and α2,4(λ) = α2,4(−λ). 2

(a) (b) 1 3×10 6 nτ

ns 0.015 λ=0.0 ) 2 s

λ=0.2 n 6

0×10 & 0

τ (A/cm λ=0.3 n

0.010 J

-3×10 6 F -1 0.005 -0.4 0.0 0.4 -0.4 0.0 0.4 λ(nm) λ(nm)

0.000 (c) 1

-0.005 ) h / 2 e

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 ( 0

δ G

-1 -0.4 0.0 0.4 FIG. S2. Free energy as a function of δ for diﬀerent λ and V = 3. λ(nm)

FIG. S4. (a)-(c) Current density J, order parameters n and n , and The free energy as a function of δ for diﬀerent λ and with τ s Hall conductance Gxy as a function of λ at T = 0K. The arrows V = 3 and µ = 1.5 is shown in Fig. S2. The presence indicate the direction of evolution of the hysteresis loops. of a nonzero λ lifts the degeneracy between the two valley- polarized states. As a consequence, one valley-polarized state becomes metastable, while the other becomes the global IV. Switching of valley polarization at zero temperature ground state. Upon further increasing or decreasing λ, the metastable state becomes unstable and the switching of VP In Fig. S4, we show the current density J, order parameters happens. nτ and ns, and Hall conductance Gxy as a function of λ at T = 0 K. The results exhibit that a critical voltage is required to induce a current before the switching of the Hall conductance. III. Dependence on the gate distance Here the voltage Ve = EeL ∝ λ, where L is the length of the system. The critical voltage is determined by the insulating gap. Above the critical voltage, electrons gain enough energy The gate distance d controls the screening of the Coulomb to overcome the insulating gap to conduct current. interaction. As d decreases, the screened Coulomb potential becomes weaker. When the Coulomb interaction is not over- screened, the valley-spin-polarized state in Fig.3 remains the V. Estimate the edge current contribution in overcoming the ground state and the QAHE persists. The energy gap of the energy barrier valley-spin-polarized QAH state increases with d, as shown in Fig. S3. Since the robustness of the QAH state depends on Here we estimate the edge current contribution in overcom- the gap, the critical temperature for the QAHE and the critical ing the energy barrier between diﬀerent ground states with op- current for the switching of valley polarization both increase posite VP. Because of the large unit cell size at a small twist with d. angle, it is hard to access the edge states of the TBG. Instead, we use the edge states of the Haldane model to mimic that of TBG. Explicitly, we consider the Haldane model described by 2.4 the Hamiltonian [S2]

2.2 X3 HH = 2t2 cos φ cos(k · bi)σ0 (meV)

g 2.0 i=1 E X3 h i 1.8 + t1 cos(k · ai)σx + sin(k · ai)σy (S10) i=1

1.6  3   X  10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 + M − 2t2 sin φ sin(k · bi) σz, d (nm)   i=1 on a honeycomb lattice whose lattice constant is set to unity. FIG. S3. Energy gap of the valley-spin-polarized QAH state as a Here t is the hopping energy between the nth nearest neigh- function of the gate distance d. n boring (NN) lattice sites, σ0 is the 2 × 2 identity matrix, and σx,y,z are the Pauli matrices acting on the sublattice degree of 3

(a) (b) pation in the conductance and valence bands at λ = λ . As a 4 c -1440 reference, we show the electron occupation in the absence of 2 1 λ /t current for = 0 in Fig. S6(b), where the conductance (va- 0 C= -1 C= 1 -1450 F M/t lence) bands are fully empty (occupied) at zero temperature.

-4 C= 0 -1460 The two branches of counter-propagating edge states are par-

-π -π/2 0 π/2 π -π -π/2 0 π/2 π tially ﬁlled. In the presence of the critical current for λ = λc, ф ф the electron occupation is shown in Fig. S6(c). Apparently, (c) (d) 3 the branch of edge states propagating along the current direction is fully ﬁlled, while the other branch is empty. Moreover,

1 there are electrons pumped from the valence bands to conduc- 0 W E/t tance bands as in the TBG. Namely, the edge current alone is not enough to overcome the energy barrier in this case. The

-3 pumped electrons occupy the the bottom of conduction bands 0 2π kx where the density of states is high. Therefore, the bulk current plays a dominant role in overcoming the energy barrier for a large system. The edge current can be important if the FIG. S5. (a) Phase diagram of the Haldane model. The Chern num- sample size is small since the energy barrier grows linearly in bers of different phases are shown. (b) Free energy of the Haldane the sample volume. However, in experiments [6,7], the device model along the straight line in (a) at half filling and zero temperature. (c) A strip of honeycomb lattice with width W and zigzag edges. is in micron size, that contains hundreds of moire´ unit cells (d) Energy spectrum of the Haldane model on the honeycomb lattice (considering the lattice constant of the small-angle TBG is of strip. the order of 10 nm) in the cross section. This fact motivates us to study the switching of VP and topology in TBG by electric currents in the bulk. freedom. a1,2,3 are the three vectors connecting NN lattice sites, and b1,2,3 are primitive lattice vectors related by 3-fold (a) (b) 3 rotation. M is the sublattice potential breaking the inversion λ=0.00 symmetry, and φ is the phase factor associated with the sec- -7850 λ=0.90 λ=1.10 1 ond NN hopping. The topological phase of the model is de- λ=1.20 1 0 termined by M and φ, as shown by the phase diagram in Fig. λ=1.25 E/t λ=1.30 S5(a). By choosing t2 = 0.07t1 and M = 3t2, we show the free -7900 energy as a function of φ of the Haldane model at half fill- -3 0 2π 1 ing and zero temperature in Fig. S5(b). Apparently, there are /t kx F (c) 3 two degenerate energy minimum with opposite Chern number -7950 C = ±1 at φ = ±π/2, that is similar to the TBG. Therefore, by taking φ as an internal order parameter (playing the same role 1 0 of δ), we can use the Haldane model to mimic the free energy E/t 0 profile and topology of the TBG. -8000 To study the edge current contribution, we consider a stripe -3 of honeycomb lattice with zigzag edges along the x direction, -π -π/2 0 π/2 π 0 2π ф kx as shown in Fig. S5(c). The edge asymmetry can be introduced by adding an onsite potential V to the upper edge, which is highlighted in Fig. S5(c). For√V = 2t2, the energy spectrum FIG. S6. (a) Free energy of the Haldane model as a function of φ of the strip with width W = 25 3 (that contains 50 unit cells for different λ. (b) and (c) Electron occupation for λ = 0 and for in the cross section) is shown in Fig. S5(d). Here the edge λ = 1.25, respectively. states traversing the the bulk energy gap are marked by red color. In the presence of a current along the strip, the sys- P tem is described by HH − n λ∂kx εk,n where εk,n represents the bare dispersion of the strip [see Fig. S5(d)] and n is the band index. The current lifts the degeneracy of the two en- ± ergy minima at φ = π/2, as shown in Fig. S6(a). The energy [S1] G. Grosso and G. P. Parravicini, Solid State Physics (Aca- barrier between the two minima vanishes at a critical λ, i.e. demic Press, London, 2000). λc ≈ 1.25 in this case, that corresponds to the switching of VP [S2] F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without and topology in TBG. To show the edge current contribution Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the ”Parity in overcoming the energy barrier, we study the electron occu- Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).