Airfield/Airstrip Directory
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CITY/COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 23, 2016 Mission Field, Livingston 12:00 Noon
CITY/COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 23, 2016 Mission Field, Livingston 12:00 noon Members Present: Ray Sundling, Chairman Don Wilson Dennis Skattum George Denton Noreen Burg, Secretary Members Absent: Kerry LaDuke Others Present: Marty Malone, Russell Ferguson, JoAnn Ferguson, Parks Frady, Lance Bowser and Joan Bozlee The meeting was called to order Chairman Ray Sundling. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as emailed. Unfinished Business Landfill Project Permit- Parks Frady states that the majority of the work on the Landfill Project is completed. He wants to address any concerns of the board members on the conditions of the Land use permit. Ray rode with the contractor prior to their reclamation and requested that the far end of the original road be left as it is and only the area where it curves around to the cut across be removed. The contractor did a good job removing the cut across and reclaiming the temporary road areas. There may be a section of the road that will need to be rolled at a later date. Reseeding has yet to be done. Russ was concerned about weeds invading the area. Parks states after reseeding they usually let it grow for 2 years and spray on the 3rd year. He will have his crew do the spraying. The board and county commissioner are satisfied with the reclamation work that's been done. Mission Field Crack Seal Project- Lance Bowser of Robert Peccia & Associates reported on the Mission Field Crack Seal Project. There have been two 2 day closures so far and the work is approximately 75-80% done. -
JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016
Habitat and Species Cooperative Restoration Program Joint Base Lewis-McChord Center for Natural Lands Management JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016 Submitted to: Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fish and Wildlife Program Submitted by: Adrian Wolf, Gary Slater and Hannah Anderson Center for Natural Lands Management 120 Union Avenue Southeast Olympia WA, 98501 Phone: 360-584-2538 Joint Base Lewis-McChord is a key military installation and the most important conservation area in the Puget Trough region. The Center for Natural Lands Management strives to assist Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the conservation of its natural resources within the framework of the military training mandate. Joint Base Lewis- McChord and its conservation partners have shared interests because: Healthy natural ecosystems are essential for realistic and sustainable training lands. Rare species recovery throughout the region reduces the burden of recovery on any single landowner or site. Pest plants harm natural areas and reduce their suitability for military training. Page 2 Table of Contents Project Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................... -
Specifications and Contract Documents
SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Killeen, Texas Robert Gray Army Airfield (RGAAF) Security Surveillance Improvements at Robert Gray Army Airfield City of Killeen RFP No. 19-10 ISSUED FOR RFP Garver Project No. 17181082 Project Sponsors: Prepared For: City of Killeen November 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 SECTION I. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 SECTION 000001 CERTIFICATIONS SECURITY SURVEILLANCE IMPROVEMENTS AT ROBERT GRAY ARMY AIRFIELD PROJECT GARVER PROJECT NO. 17181082 CITY OF KILLEEN RFP NO. 19-10 I hereby certify that the applicable portions of this project plans and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Engineer under the laws of the State of Texas. APPLICABLE DIVISION OR SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY Derek Mayo, P.E. General Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed: Matthew LeMay, P.E. Electrical Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed: Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP 000001-1 November 6, 2018 SECTION 000001 CERTIFICATIONS APPLICABLE DIVISION OR SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY Michael A. Guzik, P.E. CTI Telecom Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed GARVER, LLC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: TX ENGINEERING REGISTRATION NO. F-5713 TX ARCHITECTURAL REGISTRATION NO. 21507 CTI CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: TX REGISTERED CONSULTING FIRM B-17368 Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. -
May 7,2009 Be Available in the Near Future at Http
Monlo no De porlme nf of lronsoo rt oii on Jim Lvnch, Dîrector *ruhrylaùtlthNde 2701 Prospect Avenue Brîon Schweífzer, Gov ernor PO Box 201001 Heleno MT 59620-1001 May 7,2009 Ted Mathis Gallatin Field 850 Gallatin Field Road #6 Belgrade MT 59714 Subject: Montana Aimorts Economic knpact Study 2009 Montana State Aviation System Plan Dear Ted, I am pleased to announce that the Economic Impact Study of Montana Airports has been completed. This study was a two-year collaborative eflort between the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Aeronautics Division, the Federal Aviation Administration, Wilbur Smith and Associates and Morrison Maierle Inc. The enclosed study is an effort to break down aviation's significant contributions in Montana and show how these impacts affect economies on a statewide and local level. Depending on your location, you may also find enclosed several copies of an individual economic summary specific to your airport. Results ofthe study clearly show that Montana's 120 public use airports are a major catalyst to our economy. Montana enplanes over 1.5 million prissengers per year at our 15 commercial service airports, half of whom are visiting tourists. The economic value of aviation is over $1.56 billion and contributes nearly 4.5 percent to our total gross state product. There arc 18,759 aviation dependent positions in Montana, accounting for four percent of the total workforce and $600 million in wages. In addition to the economic benefits, the study also highlights how Montana residents increasingly depend on aviation to support their healtþ welfare, and safety. Montana airports support critical services for medical care, agriculture, recreation, emergency access, law enforcement, and fire fighting. -
Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports
Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83 -
JBLM Streaked Horned Lark Surveys and Monitoring 2016
Habitat and Species Cooperative Restoration Program Joint Base Lewis-McChord Center for Natural Lands Management JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2016 W911S8-15-2-0001 W911S8-15-2-0004 W911S8-15-2-0012 W911S8-16-2-0010 CNLM Task Orders #G1117, G1118, G1131, G1155 March 2017 Submitted to: Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fish and Wildlife Program Submitted by: Adrian Wolf, Gary Slater and Jerrmaine Treadwell Center for Natural Lands Management 120 Union Avenue Southeast Olympia WA, 98501 Phone: 360-584-2538 Joint Base Lewis-McChord is a key military installation and the most important conservation area in the Puget Trough region. The Center for Natural Lands Management strives to assist Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the conservation of its natural resources within the framework of the military training mandate. Joint Base Lewis- McChord and its conservation partners have shared interests because: Healthy natural ecosystems are essential for realistic and sustainable training lands. Rare species recovery throughout the region reduces the burden of recovery on any single landowner or site. Pest plants harm natural areas and reduce their suitability for military training. Page i Table of Contents Project Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................... -
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview July 18, 2012 Contents . Definitions . Facts & Figures . UAS Budgets and Spending . Trends and Challenges . Future of Unmanned Aerial Systems . Summary and Recommendations . Appendix A: DoD UAS Acquisition Costs . Appendix B: DoD Current and Future Domestic UAS Locations 2 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definitions . Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) . Refers to systems whose components include the necessary equipment, network, and personnel to control an unmanned aircraft . UAS is a broader term that includes equipment, networks, and personnel in addition to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) . Refers to a powered aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operation, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle life, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload . Commonly known as “drones”. In practice, the terms UAS and UAV are often used interchangeably Source: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011. 3 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Facts & Figures . Dept. of Defense (DoD) spending on UAS has increased from $284 million in FY00 to $3.9 billion in FY12 . DoD’s unmanned aircraft inventory increased more than 40-fold from 167 aircraft in 2002 to nearly 7,500 in 2010 . In 2009, DoD completed almost 500,000 UAS flight hours just in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom . In May 2010, unmanned systems surpassed one million flight hours . In November 2010 unmanned systems achieved one million combat hours Sources: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011; CRS Report R42136, “Unmanned Aerial Systems,” January 3, 2012; Dept. -
Fort Hood Noise Study
130 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1312 Fort Hood Noise Study RICHARD M. LETTY At the request' of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer , Fort WortJ1 measuring airfield noise and impulsive weapon-firing blast District Office, an in tallation compatible-use zone (ICUZ) noise noise, it was decided that the noise monitoring would be study was prepared for Fort Hood, Texa . The purpose f this performed in two phases. The Phase I noise measurements study was to addres the n i e impact from military training ac focused on airfield noise. A total of nine noise measurement tivity conducted at Fort Hood. The major component of this Fort Hood I UZ noise study wa a comprehensive long-term noise locations were selected: two in the vicinity of RGAAF, four monitoring program and the use of computer modeling to develop around HAAF, and three along the various flight corridors noi e contour to iden tify noise-impacted areas. Noise measure leading to and from the Fort Hood Army Installation. The ments were obtained at a total of 17 noise measurement locations: Phase II noise measurements focused on the blast noise from 9 airfield noi e monitoring ·itc , and 8 weapon-fi ring blast noise artillery and weapon-firing activity on the various ranges at monitoring site . Because of the day-to-day variations in military Fort Hood. The purpose of the noise monitoring program was training activity, it was determined that 60 days of noise data at ach of the 17 noise-m nitoring sites would be useful in under not only to define the actual noise levels from airfield and standing long-term airfield and weapon-firing blast noise levels. -
Alaska Post Newspaper
FREE RECYCLED an edition of the Recycled material is used in the making of our ALASKA POST newsprint The Interior Military News Connection Vol. 8, No. 37 Fort Wainwright, Alaska September 15, 2017 Alaska, California rescue squadrons unite to save lives in Southeast Texas Staff Sgt. Balinda O’Neal Dresel 249th Airlift Squadron bound for Alaska National Guard Public Moffett Federal Airfield, Calif., Affairs to pick up two HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters and aircrews from the Air National Guardsmen from 129th Rescue Squadron. They Alaska’s Chugach Mountains and the arrived in Fort Hood in the early- heart of California’s Silicon Valley morning hours of Aug. 29 and spent last week in the flooded cities of began moving equipment to a Southeast Texas, with one mission— staging area on Gray Army Airfield to save lives. where they were later paired Aircrews, combat rescue officers, with search and rescue personnel pararescuemen and support personnel from California’s 131st Rescue from the Alaska Air National Guard’s Squadron. 176th Wing and members of the “One of the greatest aspects California Air National Guard’s of working with other pararescue 129th Rescue Wing joined more than teams is that we can come together 18,000 National Guard personnel under a common thread and who responded to the call to assist train and work as a joint force,” with Hurricane Harvey humanitarian explained Senior Master Sgt. disaster relief operations. The Airmen Brandon Stuemke, a pararescueman left home Aug. 28 to help their with the 212th Rescue Squadron. neighbors in Texas still needing relief “It allowed for us to seamlessly Air National Guard search and rescue personnel from Alaska and California conduct water and evacuation. -
Airport Affected Area Regulations (PDF)
Madison County Airport Affected Area Regulations Adopted August 11, 2014 Madison County Board of Commissioners Resolution 30-2014 Madison County Commissioners James P. Hart, Chair David Schulz Dan Happel Madison County Airport Board Tom Miller, Chair Peter Fitzgerald Scott Payne James C. Frey Ernest Bock John Hauck Beau Bradley Madison County Planning Board Richard Meehan, President Dave Maddison Kate Arpin, Vice President Rita Owens Pat Bradley Eileen Pearce John Fountain Laurie Schmidt Katherine Looney Darlene Tussing John Lounsbury Staff Barbie Durham, Airport Board Secretary Charity Fechter, Planning Director Robert Peccia & Associates Madison County AAA Regulations Adopted August 11, 2014 i Table of Contents Section I. General Provisions ..................................................................................... 1 A. Title ........................................................................................................................ 1 B. Authority ................................................................................................................ 1 C. Purpose and Intent ................................................................................................ 1 D. Designation of Airport Affected Area ...................................................................... 1 E. Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................. 2 1. Ennis Big Sky Airport ................................................................................... -
National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) (2011-2015)
NPIAS 2011-2015 Illustrated by GRA, Incorporated Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) (2011-2015) Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress Pursuant to Section 47103 of Title 49, United States Code The NPIAS 2011-2015 report is available online at http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/reports Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. VI Development Estimates .......................................................................................................... vii Estimates by Airport Type......................................................................................... viii Estimates by Type of Development...............................................................................x Status of the Industry .............................................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM COMPOSITION.......................................................................................1 Overview....................................................................................................................................1 U.S. Department of Transportation................................................................................2 Federal Aviation Administration ...................................................................................2 -
South Willow Creek Meadows Ranch
Located on South Willow Creek South Willownear Creek Pony, Montana Meadows Ranch offered exclusively by INTRODUCTION This very private, readily accessible Ranch contains The terrain is very diverse and contains high Within a 45 minute drive of Bozeman, the lush riparian bottom meadows with multiple dense rocky crags or “hogbacks” and lush grassy creek Ranch’s proximity to commercial airports willow strings, rolling hillsides with rugged granite bottoms providing prime habitat for a variety and interstate highway travel make it readily outcroppings and stunning views of Hollow Top of Rocky Mountain wildlife, including elk, accessible year 'round, and private airstrips Mountain. Located in the foothills of the majestic that traverse the Ranch from the nearby USFS. located within a 30-minute drive of the Ranch Tobacco Root Mountain Range, the South Willow Mule deer, whitetail deer and upland game birds afford additional ease of enjoyment. Creek Meadows Ranch encompasses about 1,905 are seen in abundance. acres of contiguous deeded land. The absence of poorly-designed and situated The privacy and seclusion of the Ranch could improvements – of any vintage – and outlandish Freaturing dramatic vistas of the Tobacco Root, also afford the next owner simplicity and residential structures provides an equally rare Bridger and Spanish Peaks Mountain Ranges, the enjoyment should he choose to lease it to opportunity to execute exactly what feels best to Ranch is located near the historic towns of Pony and a neighbor to summer graze its productive the next owner. Harrison – notable sites in Montana’s early history. riparian pastures. The stream bottom is partially fenced, additional fencing judiciously- The Ranch is located in one of Southwestern South Willow Creek traverses the Ranch for a one located near the creek would further preserve Montana’s premier areas for ranching, big-game and one-half mile stretch and affords excellent South Willow Creek’s habitat for enhanced hunting and fly-fishing.