DOCSLIB.ORG

Airfield/Airstrip Directory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airfield/Airstrip Directory United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Airfield/Airstrip Directory May 1, 2000 - This Document is Not for Flight Use - Airfield/Airstrip Directory May 2, 2000 GENERAL A. This Directory is for USDA-Forest Service (FS) use only. It provides dispatchers with FS classification information for airfields and airstrips in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. State and Federal aviation publications, and Notice to Airmen (NOTAMS) need to be referenced for current and pertinent information. This document is NOT FOR FLIGHT USE. B. Individual National Forests (NF) may have specific requirements for a particular airstrip. The appropriate NF dispatch office should be contacted to obtain current airstrip information. Before dispatching an aircraft into a Category 4 airstrip, a pilot must meet special requirements and the mission must be coordinated with the local Forest. CATEGORIES A. Category 1. These are major airports that have paved, lighted, multiple runways served by FAA approved instrument approach procedure(s). These airports are generally limited by their weight bearing capacity. B. Category 2. These airports generally serve small communities. They are equipped with at least one paved, lighted runway and services vary. C. Category 3. These are airfields with limited or no services. They may be unpaved, unlighted, and seasonally maintained. They are located either on Federal, State, County, Municipal, or Private land. Use approval must be obtained from the appropriate NF dispatch office. D. Category 4. These are mountain/remote airstrips and are restricted by the FS to day VFR flight only. Use authorization must be obtained from the appropriate NF dispatch office. Pilots must have an endorsement on their Pilot Qualification Card and meet specific currency requirements. PILOT REQUIREMENTS (Category 4) A. Initial: 1. Minimum of 200-hours pilot experience in typical terrain and density altitudes; and takeoffs/landings into mountain/remote airstrips. 2. Pass an initial mountain/remote airstrip flight check performed by a FS Inspector Pilot. B. Currency: Pilots must complete a minimum of 5-takeoffs/landings at 2-different FS classified Category 4 airstrips in the preceding 12-months. Pilots are restricted from operating at Category 4 airstrips, which they have not landed at within the preceding 12-months. WARNING The information contained in this directory has been collected from many sources and may not be accurate. Directory information must be verified by the user with official sources and by reference to official aeronautical charts and publications. This Directory is NOT FOR FLIGHT USE. The USDA-Forest Service publishes this directory annually. Revisions should be directed to: USDA Forest Service Smokejumper Unit Attn: Marc Anderson 605 South Mission McCall, Idaho 83638 Tel. 208-634-0365 1 NOT FOR FLIGHT USE Airfield/Airstrip Directory IDAHO Airport/Airstrip State Identifier Category Elevation Length Width Remarks Administrator Lat/Long Lights 42â55.26N Aberdeen Municipal ID U36 3 4,470 3,650 50 208-397-4758 Yes 112â52.87W 42â23.86N Albion Municipal ID U40 3 4,777 4,500 40 Dirt. Limited turnaround. 208-673-5352 No 113â33.45W 42â47.84N American Falls ID U01 2 4,419 4,900 50 208-233-7320 Yes 112â49.51W 43â40.56N Antelope Valley ID U92 3 6,180 3,450 130 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 113â36.10W 43â36.21N Arco (Pope Field) ID AOC 2 5,328 6,600 75 208-527-3261 Yes 113â20.05W 47â54.49N Athol (Silverwood) ID S62 3 2,350 4,200 50 Closed winters. 208-683-3400 Yes 116â42.56W 43â48.81N Atlanta ID 55H 4 5,500 2,460 60 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 115â08.10W 43â27.49N Atomic City (Midway) ID U37 3 5,017 3,800 175 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 112â48.55W 42â43.25N Bancroft Municipal ID U51 3 5,435 3,280 30 Dirt. 208-648-7381 No 111â52.05W 42â58.49N Bear Trap ID 1U0 4 4,716 2,250 120 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 113â21.03W 44â58.78N Bernard Creek ID U54 4 3,626 1,900 150 Dirt. USFS, 208-879-4106 No 114â44.09W 45â32.20N Big Bar ID None 4 1,308 1,100 75 Dirt. Limited turnaround. USFS, 509-758-0616 No 116â31.50W 45â07.99N Big Creek ID U60 4 5,743 3,550 110 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 115â19.31W 43â25.74N Big Southern Butte ID U46 3 5,073 2,600 110 Dirt. State, 208-334-8776 No 113â03.55W 43â12.74N Blackfoot (McClarey Field) ID U02 2 4,488 4,300 75 208-785-5454 Yes 112â20.80W 43â33.87N Boise (Gowen Field) ID BOI 1 2,868 10,000 150 208-383-3110 Yes 116â13.37W 48â43.58N Bonners Ferry (Boundary County) ID 65S 3 2,331 4,000 75 208-267-3535 Yes 116â17.73W 44â24.93N Bruce Meadows ID U63 3 6,370 5,000 110 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 115â19.01W 2 May 2, 2000 NOT FOR FLIGHT USE Airfield/Airstrip Directory IDAHO Airport/Airstrip State Identifier Category Elevation Length Width Remarks Administrator Lat/Long Lights 42â35.49N Buhl Municipal ID U03 3 3,660 3,900 60 208-543-8803 No 114â37.80W 42â32.56N Burley Municipal ID BYI 2 4,150 4,094 80 208-677-2747 Yes 113â46.29W 45â08.61N Cabin Creek ID I08 4 4,289 1,750 40 Closed Until Further Notice USFS, 208-634-0700 No 114â55.74W 43â38.51N Caldwell Industrial ID EUL 2 2,431 5,500 100 208-459-9779 Yes 116â38.12W 43â18.49N Carey ID U65 3 4,783 2,650 170 Dirt. 208-823-4361 No 113â56.05W 44â29.63N Cascade ID U70 2 4,742 4,300 60 208-382-4336 Yes 116â00.97W 48â31.25N Cavanaugh Bay ID 66S 3 2,484 3,100 120 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 116â49.81W 46â40.00N Cayuse Creek ID None 4 3,500 1,800 100 Not authorized. Dirt. USFS, 208-476-4541 No 115â04.39W 44â31.38N Challis ID U15 3 5,072 4,600 60 208-879-4526 Yes 114â13.05W 45â22.74N Chamberlain ID U79 4 5,765 4,100 200 Dirt. USFS, 208-634-0700 No 115â11.81W 47â46.46N Coeur d'Alene ID COE 1 2,318 7,400 140 208-772-7838 Yes 116â49.18W 45â17.49N Cold Meadows ID U81 4 7,030 4,550 50 Dirt. USFS, 208-634-0700 No 114â56.97W 43â48.11N Copper Basin ID 0U2 3 7,920 4,700 100 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 113â49.89W 46â02.33N Cottonwood Municipal ID S84 3 3,474 3,100 50 208-962-3231 Yes 116â19.89W 44â44.99N Council Municipal ID U82 3 2,963 3,600 50 No aircraft over 12,500 lbs. 208-253-423 Yes 116â26.81W 43â13.08N Cox's Well ID U48 3 5,034 2,700 100 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 113â13.63W 46â14.83N Craigmont Municipal ID S89 3 3,805 2,800 50 208-924-8782 Yes 116â28.81W 44â17.67N Deadwood Reservoir ID None 4 5,400 1,800 300 Dirt. Bureau of Rec., 208-382-4258 No 115â38.75W 3 May 2, 2000 NOT FOR FLIGHT USE Airfield/Airstrip Directory IDAHO Airport/Airstrip State Identifier Category Elevation Length Width Remarks Administrator Lat/Long Lights 45â31.24N Dixie ID ID05 4 5,148 4,500 100 Dirt. USFS, 208-983-1964 No 115â31.06W 44â43.74N Donnelly ID U84 3 4,860 2,500 125 Dirt. 208-325-8755 No 116â05.56W 42â25.58N Downey (Hyde Memorial) ID U58 3 4,906 3,550 50 208-897-5342 Yes 112â06.55W 43â44.52N Driggs (Reed Memorial) ID U59 2 6,230 7,300 75 208-354-2236 Yes 111â05.87W 44â09.99N Dubois Municipal ID U41 3 5,123 4,600 100 Dirt. Contact mgr. for conditions. 208-374-5509 No 112â13.55W 45â49.36N Elk City ID S90 4 4,097 2,600 150 Dirt. Limited turnaround. 208-842-2275 No 115â26.39W 43â50.99N Emmett Municipal ID S78 3 2,350 3,250 50 Limited turnaround. 208-365-4598 Yes 116â32.56W 43â20.24N Fairfield (Camas County) ID U86 3 5,058 2,950 40 Dirt. Limited turnaround. 208-764-2694 No 114â47.80W 46â19.81N Fish Lake ID S92 4 5,646 2,650 150 Dirt. USFS, 208-983-1964 No 115â03.79W 44â04.08N Garden Valley ID U88 4 3,177 3,850 125 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 115â55.89W 42â56.74N Glenns Ferry Municipal ID U89 3 2,536 3,950 60 208-366-2281 No 115â19.80W 42â55.03N Gooding Municipal ID GNG 3 3,728 4,736 75 208-934-5934 Yes 114â45.91W 43â57.31N Graham ID U45 4 5,726 2,900 50 Dirt. Limited turnaround. USFS, 208-334-9800 No 115â16.36W 45â56.55N Grangeville (Idaho County) ID S80 2 3,310 5,180 75 208-983-1565 Yes 116â07.45W 42â21.99N Grasmere ID U91 3 5,134 2,750 150 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 115â53.06W 43â30.29N Hailey (Freidman Memorial) ID SUN 2 5,315 6,602 100 208-788-4956 Yes 114â17.80W 42â34.74N Hazelton Municipal ID U94 3 4,172 2,800 60 Dirt. 208-324-2667 No 114â08.30W 44â37.75N Henry's Lake ID U53 3 6,596 4,600 170 Dirt. State, 208-334-8775 No 111â21.05W 4 May 2, 2000 NOT FOR FLIGHT USE Airfield/Airstrip Directory IDAHO Airport/Airstrip State Identifier Category Elevation Length Width Remarks Administrator Lat/Long Lights 43â19.49N Hollow Top ID 0U7 3 5,359 2,500 140 Dirt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY/COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 23, 2016 Mission Field, Livingston 12:00 Noon
    CITY/COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT BOARD MEETING MINUTES August 23, 2016 Mission Field, Livingston 12:00 noon Members Present: Ray Sundling, Chairman Don Wilson Dennis Skattum George Denton Noreen Burg, Secretary Members Absent: Kerry LaDuke Others Present: Marty Malone, Russell Ferguson, JoAnn Ferguson, Parks Frady, Lance Bowser and Joan Bozlee The meeting was called to order Chairman Ray Sundling. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as emailed. Unfinished Business Landfill Project Permit- Parks Frady states that the majority of the work on the Landfill Project is completed. He wants to address any concerns of the board members on the conditions of the Land use permit. Ray rode with the contractor prior to their reclamation and requested that the far end of the original road be left as it is and only the area where it curves around to the cut across be removed. The contractor did a good job removing the cut across and reclaiming the temporary road areas. There may be a section of the road that will need to be rolled at a later date. Reseeding has yet to be done. Russ was concerned about weeds invading the area. Parks states after reseeding they usually let it grow for 2 years and spray on the 3rd year. He will have his crew do the spraying. The board and county commissioner are satisfied with the reclamation work that's been done. Mission Field Crack Seal Project- Lance Bowser of Robert Peccia & Associates reported on the Mission Field Crack Seal Project. There have been two 2 day closures so far and the work is approximately 75-80% done.
    [Show full text]
  • JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016
    Habitat and Species Cooperative Restoration Program Joint Base Lewis-McChord Center for Natural Lands Management JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2015 W911S8-14-2-0026 W911S8-15-2-0001 CNLM Task Orders #G1108, G1118 April 2016 Submitted to: Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fish and Wildlife Program Submitted by: Adrian Wolf, Gary Slater and Hannah Anderson Center for Natural Lands Management 120 Union Avenue Southeast Olympia WA, 98501 Phone: 360-584-2538 Joint Base Lewis-McChord is a key military installation and the most important conservation area in the Puget Trough region. The Center for Natural Lands Management strives to assist Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the conservation of its natural resources within the framework of the military training mandate. Joint Base Lewis- McChord and its conservation partners have shared interests because: Healthy natural ecosystems are essential for realistic and sustainable training lands. Rare species recovery throughout the region reduces the burden of recovery on any single landowner or site. Pest plants harm natural areas and reduce their suitability for military training. Page 2 Table of Contents Project Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Goals and Objectives ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Specifications and Contract Documents
    SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Killeen, Texas Robert Gray Army Airfield (RGAAF) Security Surveillance Improvements at Robert Gray Army Airfield City of Killeen RFP No. 19-10 ISSUED FOR RFP Garver Project No. 17181082 Project Sponsors: Prepared For: City of Killeen November 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 SECTION I. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 This page intentionally left blank Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP November 6, 2018 SECTION 000001 CERTIFICATIONS SECURITY SURVEILLANCE IMPROVEMENTS AT ROBERT GRAY ARMY AIRFIELD PROJECT GARVER PROJECT NO. 17181082 CITY OF KILLEEN RFP NO. 19-10 I hereby certify that the applicable portions of this project plans and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Engineer under the laws of the State of Texas. APPLICABLE DIVISION OR SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY Derek Mayo, P.E. General Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed: Matthew LeMay, P.E. Electrical Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed: Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No. 17181082 Issued for RFP 000001-1 November 6, 2018 SECTION 000001 CERTIFICATIONS APPLICABLE DIVISION OR SEAL AND SIGNATURE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY Michael A. Guzik, P.E. CTI Telecom Plans and Specifications Digitally Signed GARVER, LLC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: TX ENGINEERING REGISTRATION NO. F-5713 TX ARCHITECTURAL REGISTRATION NO. 21507 CTI CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: TX REGISTERED CONSULTING FIRM B-17368 Security Surveillance Improvements at RGAAF Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • May 7,2009 Be Available in the Near Future at Http
    Monlo no De porlme nf of lronsoo rt oii on Jim Lvnch, Dîrector *ruhrylaùtlthNde 2701 Prospect Avenue Brîon Schweífzer, Gov ernor PO Box 201001 Heleno MT 59620-1001 May 7,2009 Ted Mathis Gallatin Field 850 Gallatin Field Road #6 Belgrade MT 59714 Subject: Montana Aimorts Economic knpact Study 2009 Montana State Aviation System Plan Dear Ted, I am pleased to announce that the Economic Impact Study of Montana Airports has been completed. This study was a two-year collaborative eflort between the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) Aeronautics Division, the Federal Aviation Administration, Wilbur Smith and Associates and Morrison Maierle Inc. The enclosed study is an effort to break down aviation's significant contributions in Montana and show how these impacts affect economies on a statewide and local level. Depending on your location, you may also find enclosed several copies of an individual economic summary specific to your airport. Results ofthe study clearly show that Montana's 120 public use airports are a major catalyst to our economy. Montana enplanes over 1.5 million prissengers per year at our 15 commercial service airports, half of whom are visiting tourists. The economic value of aviation is over $1.56 billion and contributes nearly 4.5 percent to our total gross state product. There arc 18,759 aviation dependent positions in Montana, accounting for four percent of the total workforce and $600 million in wages. In addition to the economic benefits, the study also highlights how Montana residents increasingly depend on aviation to support their healtþ welfare, and safety. Montana airports support critical services for medical care, agriculture, recreation, emergency access, law enforcement, and fire fighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports
    Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83
    [Show full text]
  • JBLM Streaked Horned Lark Surveys and Monitoring 2016
    Habitat and Species Cooperative Restoration Program Joint Base Lewis-McChord Center for Natural Lands Management JBLM Lark Monitoring Final Report 2016 W911S8-15-2-0001 W911S8-15-2-0004 W911S8-15-2-0012 W911S8-16-2-0010 CNLM Task Orders #G1117, G1118, G1131, G1155 March 2017 Submitted to: Joint Base Lewis-McChord Fish and Wildlife Program Submitted by: Adrian Wolf, Gary Slater and Jerrmaine Treadwell Center for Natural Lands Management 120 Union Avenue Southeast Olympia WA, 98501 Phone: 360-584-2538 Joint Base Lewis-McChord is a key military installation and the most important conservation area in the Puget Trough region. The Center for Natural Lands Management strives to assist Joint Base Lewis-McChord in the conservation of its natural resources within the framework of the military training mandate. Joint Base Lewis- McChord and its conservation partners have shared interests because: Healthy natural ecosystems are essential for realistic and sustainable training lands. Rare species recovery throughout the region reduces the burden of recovery on any single landowner or site. Pest plants harm natural areas and reduce their suitability for military training. Page i Table of Contents Project Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Goals and Objectives ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview
    Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview July 18, 2012 Contents . Definitions . Facts & Figures . UAS Budgets and Spending . Trends and Challenges . Future of Unmanned Aerial Systems . Summary and Recommendations . Appendix A: DoD UAS Acquisition Costs . Appendix B: DoD Current and Future Domestic UAS Locations 2 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definitions . Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) . Refers to systems whose components include the necessary equipment, network, and personnel to control an unmanned aircraft . UAS is a broader term that includes equipment, networks, and personnel in addition to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) . Refers to a powered aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operation, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle life, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload . Commonly known as “drones”. In practice, the terms UAS and UAV are often used interchangeably Source: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011. 3 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Facts & Figures . Dept. of Defense (DoD) spending on UAS has increased from $284 million in FY00 to $3.9 billion in FY12 . DoD’s unmanned aircraft inventory increased more than 40-fold from 167 aircraft in 2002 to nearly 7,500 in 2010 . In 2009, DoD completed almost 500,000 UAS flight hours just in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom . In May 2010, unmanned systems surpassed one million flight hours . In November 2010 unmanned systems achieved one million combat hours Sources: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011; CRS Report R42136, “Unmanned Aerial Systems,” January 3, 2012; Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Hood Noise Study
    130 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1312 Fort Hood Noise Study RICHARD M. LETTY At the request' of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer , Fort WortJ1 measuring airfield noise and impulsive weapon-firing blast District Office, an in tallation compatible-use zone (ICUZ) noise noise, it was decided that the noise monitoring would be study was prepared for Fort Hood, Texa . The purpose f this performed in two phases. The Phase I noise measurements study was to addres the n i e impact from military training ac­ focused on airfield noise. A total of nine noise measurement tivity conducted at Fort Hood. The major component of this Fort Hood I UZ noise study wa a comprehensive long-term noise locations were selected: two in the vicinity of RGAAF, four monitoring program and the use of computer modeling to develop around HAAF, and three along the various flight corridors noi e contour to iden tify noise-impacted areas. Noise measure­ leading to and from the Fort Hood Army Installation. The ments were obtained at a total of 17 noise measurement locations: Phase II noise measurements focused on the blast noise from 9 airfield noi e monitoring ·itc , and 8 weapon-fi ring blast noise artillery and weapon-firing activity on the various ranges at monitoring site . Because of the day-to-day variations in military Fort Hood. The purpose of the noise monitoring program was training activity, it was determined that 60 days of noise data at ach of the 17 noise-m nitoring sites would be useful in under­ not only to define the actual noise levels from airfield and standing long-term airfield and weapon-firing blast noise levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Post Newspaper
    FREE RECYCLED an edition of the Recycled material is used in the making of our ALASKA POST newsprint The Interior Military News Connection Vol. 8, No. 37 Fort Wainwright, Alaska September 15, 2017 Alaska, California rescue squadrons unite to save lives in Southeast Texas Staff Sgt. Balinda O’Neal Dresel 249th Airlift Squadron bound for Alaska National Guard Public Moffett Federal Airfield, Calif., Affairs to pick up two HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters and aircrews from the Air National Guardsmen from 129th Rescue Squadron. They Alaska’s Chugach Mountains and the arrived in Fort Hood in the early- heart of California’s Silicon Valley morning hours of Aug. 29 and spent last week in the flooded cities of began moving equipment to a Southeast Texas, with one mission— staging area on Gray Army Airfield to save lives. where they were later paired Aircrews, combat rescue officers, with search and rescue personnel pararescuemen and support personnel from California’s 131st Rescue from the Alaska Air National Guard’s Squadron. 176th Wing and members of the “One of the greatest aspects California Air National Guard’s of working with other pararescue 129th Rescue Wing joined more than teams is that we can come together 18,000 National Guard personnel under a common thread and who responded to the call to assist train and work as a joint force,” with Hurricane Harvey humanitarian explained Senior Master Sgt. disaster relief operations. The Airmen Brandon Stuemke, a pararescueman left home Aug. 28 to help their with the 212th Rescue Squadron. neighbors in Texas still needing relief “It allowed for us to seamlessly Air National Guard search and rescue personnel from Alaska and California conduct water and evacuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Affected Area Regulations (PDF)
    Madison County Airport Affected Area Regulations Adopted August 11, 2014 Madison County Board of Commissioners Resolution 30-2014 Madison County Commissioners James P. Hart, Chair David Schulz Dan Happel Madison County Airport Board Tom Miller, Chair Peter Fitzgerald Scott Payne James C. Frey Ernest Bock John Hauck Beau Bradley Madison County Planning Board Richard Meehan, President Dave Maddison Kate Arpin, Vice President Rita Owens Pat Bradley Eileen Pearce John Fountain Laurie Schmidt Katherine Looney Darlene Tussing John Lounsbury Staff Barbie Durham, Airport Board Secretary Charity Fechter, Planning Director Robert Peccia & Associates Madison County AAA Regulations Adopted August 11, 2014 i Table of Contents Section I. General Provisions ..................................................................................... 1 A. Title ........................................................................................................................ 1 B. Authority ................................................................................................................ 1 C. Purpose and Intent ................................................................................................ 1 D. Designation of Airport Affected Area ...................................................................... 1 E. Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................. 2 1. Ennis Big Sky Airport ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) (2011-2015)
    NPIAS 2011-2015 Illustrated by GRA, Incorporated Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) (2011-2015) Report of the Secretary of Transportation to the United States Congress Pursuant to Section 47103 of Title 49, United States Code The NPIAS 2011-2015 report is available online at http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/reports Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. VI Development Estimates .......................................................................................................... vii Estimates by Airport Type......................................................................................... viii Estimates by Type of Development...............................................................................x Status of the Industry .............................................................................................................. xii CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM COMPOSITION.......................................................................................1 Overview....................................................................................................................................1 U.S. Department of Transportation................................................................................2 Federal Aviation Administration ...................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • South Willow Creek Meadows Ranch
    Located on South Willow Creek South Willownear Creek Pony, Montana Meadows Ranch offered exclusively by INTRODUCTION This very private, readily accessible Ranch contains The terrain is very diverse and contains high Within a 45 minute drive of Bozeman, the lush riparian bottom meadows with multiple dense rocky crags or “hogbacks” and lush grassy creek Ranch’s proximity to commercial airports willow strings, rolling hillsides with rugged granite bottoms providing prime habitat for a variety and interstate highway travel make it readily outcroppings and stunning views of Hollow Top of Rocky Mountain wildlife, including elk, accessible year 'round, and private airstrips Mountain. Located in the foothills of the majestic that traverse the Ranch from the nearby USFS. located within a 30-minute drive of the Ranch Tobacco Root Mountain Range, the South Willow Mule deer, whitetail deer and upland game birds afford additional ease of enjoyment. Creek Meadows Ranch encompasses about 1,905 are seen in abundance. acres of contiguous deeded land. The absence of poorly-designed and situated The privacy and seclusion of the Ranch could improvements – of any vintage – and outlandish Freaturing dramatic vistas of the Tobacco Root, also afford the next owner simplicity and residential structures provides an equally rare Bridger and Spanish Peaks Mountain Ranges, the enjoyment should he choose to lease it to opportunity to execute exactly what feels best to Ranch is located near the historic towns of Pony and a neighbor to summer graze its productive the next owner. Harrison – notable sites in Montana’s early history. riparian pastures. The stream bottom is partially fenced, additional fencing judiciously- The Ranch is located in one of Southwestern South Willow Creek traverses the Ranch for a one located near the creek would further preserve Montana’s premier areas for ranching, big-game and one-half mile stretch and affords excellent South Willow Creek’s habitat for enhanced hunting and fly-fishing.
    [Show full text]