DOCSLIB.ORG

Inspectors' Matters, Issues And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inspectors' Matters, Issues And HAMBLETON LOCAL PLAN INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION: INSPECTORS’ MATTERS, ISSUES AND QUESTION FOR EXAMINATION. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ALLOCATION GTA 1: SKOTTOWE CRESCENT, GREAT AYTON COMMENTS IN RESPECT OF BUILT HERITAGE, LANDSCAPE & ECOLOGY Introduction 1. These comments are made in respect of the Independent Examination of the Hambleton Local Plan (HLP), Inspectors’ Matters, Issues and Questions for Examination (Sept. 2020). Specifically, they provide a response to Matter 4, Issue 1, Question 6 and Matter 4, Issue 7 – GTA Skottowe Crescent, Questions 9-12. 2. The comments supplement those previously made (BWB Consulting dated 16 th September 2019) in respect of the HLP Publication Draft 2019 (LP01) and the proposed residential allocation of land at Skottowe Crescent, Great Ayton (GTA1). In short summary, the previous comments noted that: ° The site is in close proximity to a number of designated heritage assets including the Grade I listed Church of All Saints (List Entry Number 1150650), the Grade II* listed Ayton Hall and associated Grade II listed Farm Building (1150629) and the Grade II listed Christ Church (1150639). The site is also in close proximity to the boundary to the Great Ayton Conservation Area. ° The site contributes positively to the setting of these assets and is significant in illustrating historic agricultural landscape setting and in facilitating significant views towards and from these designated assets. ° As such, the development of the site will have a significant adverse impact upon the inter-related setting of these assets. Having regard to the number of assets affected and the higher Grading of the Church of All Saints and Great Ayton Hall, the cumulative impact of the development could potentially amount to substantial harm. ° The Council’s evidence base, including Heritage Background Papers (SD24), have failed to properly consider the extent of impact likely to arise from the development or provide justification, in accordance with current Historic England best practice guidance, sufficient to outweigh the potential harm to the identified heritage assets. ° On this basis it is considered that the allocation of the site would be unsound. 3. Notwithstanding these comments, no modifications, in respect of heritage matters, have been proposed by the Council in respect of the GTA1 site. 4. In advance of the Examination the Council has provide a response to the Initial Questions for Examination set out by the Inspector. In respect of the GTA1 proposed allocation the Inspector posed the following question (para. 28): “At Great Ayton, Historic England have indicated that site GTA1 (Skottowe Crescent) lies with the setting of a Grade I Listed Building and other designated heritage assets. Does the evidence in support of the Plan justify the allocation? Is the Plan consistent with paragraph 185 of the Framework in this regard, which, amongst other things, requires plans to take account of the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness?” 5. In response, the Council relies upon the evidence base provided by the heritage background papers (SD24) for the proposed allocation sites and states that: “The evidence base was used as a mechanism to assist the Council in allocating the site whilst seeking to omit substantial harm of the heritage assets.” [sic] 6. This indicates that the approach taken by the Council in allocating the site is simply to avoid potential substantial harm (this is confirmed within the concluding paragraph to the Council’s response). It also states that “the evidence base is considered to justify the allocation notwithstanding the recognised impact on the historic environment” (our emphasis). We would question where, within the evidence base, this ‘recognised impact’ has been articulated and evaluated in order to allow the Council to properly consider the extent and nature of development impact upon the inter-related heritage assets. This statement is also clearly incompatible with the proposed site requirement that a heritage statement will be required to “identify how the development will not cause harm to the elements that contribute to the significance of these assets.” 7. The Council further state that the development would maintain open space and glimpses of the countryside from the conservation area and from the listed buildings and that the design and layout “ must acknowledge and respond to the indivisibility between the site and the conservation area.” This is however apparently contradicted by the indication that additional landscaping should be provided to the southern boundary in order to “separate the heritage asset from site ”. These two approaches do not appear compatible and landscaping, in itself, will not remove or reduce the extent of harm identified. 8. Overall, it is considered that the position remains that the Council has not undertaken a sufficiently detailed assessment of the potential impact of the allocation proportionate to the significance of the assets affected. The NPPF is clear, reflecting statutory guidance, that “great weight” should be given to the conservation of designated heritage assets and that, the more important the asset, the greater the weight should. This is irrespective of whether this harm amounts to substantial harm, total loss of less than substantial harm to its significance. 9. We provide comments in respect of the Inspectors’ questions below. Matter 4 – Site Allocations (Part 2 Allocations) Issue 1 – Site Allocations Methodology Q6. How were site constraints, such as transport, flooding, landscape character, heritage and mineral safeguarding taken into account as part of the site allocation process. 10. As discussed above, in response to the Inspectors’ Initial Questions, the Council relies upon the evidence base provided by the heritage background papers (SD24) in supporting the allocation of sites potential affected by heritage constraints. As previously submitted we considered that, in the case of site allocation GTA1, the relevant background paper does not provide a sufficiently robust assessment, proportionate to the number and significance of designated heritage assets potentially affected, to allow the Council to properly consider and understand the impact of the allocation. In simply seeking to “omit substantial harm” to heritage assets the Council has failed to demonstrate that “great weight” has been given to the need to conserve designated heritage assets. 11. In response to the Inspectors’ Initial Questions, the Council have acknowledged that the development of GTA1 will impact upon the historic environment. We would submit that the evidence base relied upon by the Council in support of the allocation is insufficient to provide justification for the allocation in accordance with Historic England guidance (Advise Note 3, The Historic Environment and Site Allocations in Local Plans). This guidance indicates that, in determining whether a site allocation is appropriate in terms of the NPPF test of soundness, the allocation should be: “Justified in terms of any impacts on heritage assets, when considered against the reasonable alternative sites and based on proportionate evidence.” 12. On this basis we remain of the view that the proposed allocation, GTA1, is unsound and should be deleted. 13. This conclusion agrees with the consultation response to the Publication Draft submitted by Historic England. They indicate that the development would impact upon the setting of a number of listed buildings in its vicinity including the Grade I Listed Church of All Saints and the Grade II* Listed Ayton Hall. With respect to the conclusion reached by the Heritage Background Paper (SD24) that development would provide opportunity for enhancement, Historic England states that: “We disagree with that conclusion and consider that the Heritage Background Paper has underplayed the important role that the allocated site makes to the setting and appreciation of the highly graded listed buildings and the conservation area.” 14. Historic England conclude that the proposed allocation is unsound and, in respect of heritage harm, state that; “we do not agree that the harm is capable of effective mitigation and recommend the site is deleted.” Matter 4 – Site Allocations (Part 2 Allocations) Issue 7 – Stokesley Area Sites: GTA1 – Skottowe Crescent, Great Ayton Q9. How have the effects of development on the Great Ayton Conservation Area and the setting of neighbouring listed buildings been considered as part of the site allocation process, have particular regard to the setting of, and views towards, the Grade I listed Church of All Saints and the Grade II* listed Ayton Hall. Is the allocation justified. 15. As set out in previous submission in response to the consultation on the HLP Publication Draft, we consider that the relevant heritage background paper (SD24), whilst provides a high-level overview, does not provide sufficient assessment of potential impacts to allow the Council to properly consider the nature and extent of heritage harm arising from the allocation. The background paper does not sufficiently analyse the significance, including significance within setting, of the assemblage of designated heritage assets to the south of the proposed allocation site. Whilst acknowledging that development will have potential to harm elements which contribute to the significance of the heritage assets it does not articulate or assess these elements or evaluate the extent of harm to significance. 16. It
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roseberry Topping a Short Tour of the Celebrated Landmark the Book “Roseberry Topping”
    Roseberry Topping a short tour of the celebrated landmark The book “Roseberry Topping” This presentation is taken from a book, published in 2006, by the local history group Great Ayton Community Archaeology and the landscape photographer Joe Cornish, who lives in Great Ayton. All 3,000 copies of the publication were sold in six months or so, and copies rarely, if ever, appear on the second-hand market. Geology Roseberry Topping consists of almost horizontal strata arranged like a layer cake. Saltwick Sandstone cap Whitby Mudstone (with jet at lower levels) Cleveland Ironstone Staithes Sandstone Origin of the name The name Roseberry Topping derives from Othenesberg, Old Norse for the hill of Odin, named by the Scandinavian invaders. The initial “R” arose from the village of Newton-under- Roseberry, with alliteration of the “r” of “under”. Toppinn is Old Norse for hill. This became Anglicised into Topping. Roseberry is the only location in Britain to be overtly named after Odin, and was clearly held in high regards by the Scandinavians. Lord Rosebery In spite of the slightly different spelling, the title “Lord Rosebery” does derive from the Topping. The Earldom of Roseberry was created in 1703 by Queen Anne, in recognition of Sir Archibald Primrose’s support for William of Orange. The Primrose family owned land near Roseberry Topping, and thought the name “Roseberry” had a good sound to it, hence they adopted the name for the title. Over the years it lost one of its “r” letters. The Fifth Earl, shown here, is remembered for having three ambitions; to marry the richest woman in England, to become Prime Minister and to win the Derby with one of his horses.
    [Show full text]
  • North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 25. North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area profile: Supporting documents www.gov.uk/natural-england 1 National Character 25. North York Moors and Cleveland Hills Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Establishments in TS13 Liverton Mines, Saltburn
    Pattinson.co.uk - Tel: 0191 239 3252 drinking establishments in TS13 Single storey A4 public house Two bedroom house adjoining Liverton Mines, Saltburn-by-the-Sea Excellent development potential (STP) North Yorkshire, TS13 4QH Parking for 3-5 vehicles Great roadside position £95,000 (pub +VAT) Freehold title Pattinson.co.uk - Tel: 0191 239 3252 Summary - Property Type: Drinking Establishments - Parking: Allocated Price: £95,000 Description An end-terraced property of the pub, which is a single-storey construction under flat roofing. It is attached to a two-storey house, which is connected both internally and both have their own front doors. The pub main door is located at the centre of the property and leads into, on the right a Public Bar with pool area. To the left of the entrance is a Lounge Bar. Both rooms are connected by the servery, which has a galley style small kitchen in-between both rooms. There are Gents toilets in the Bar with Ladies toilets in the Lounge. Behind the servery are two rooms, one for storage the other being the beer cellar. We are informed that the two-storey house on the end elevation is also part of the property, but is in poor decorative order and is condemned for habitation. It briefly comprises Lounge, Kitchen and Bathroom on the ground floor and has two double bedrooms and a small box room on the first floor of the house only. The property would lend itself to be used for existing use or be developed for alternative use, subject to the required planning permissions.
    [Show full text]
  • PEIR Appendix
    Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume III - Appendices Appendix 17A: Landscape Character The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended) Prepared for: Net Zero Teesside Power Ltd. & Net Zero North Sea Storage Ltd. Appendix 17A Landscape Character Table of Contents 17A. Landscape Character .....................................................17-1 17.1 National ...................................................................................................... 17-1 17.2 Regional ..................................................................................................... 17-4 17.3 Local ........................................................................................................... 17-4 17.4 References ................................................................................................. 17-9 Tables Table 17A-1: NCA Summary Table ....................................................................... 17-1 Table 17A-2: MCA Summary Table (Marine Management Organisation, 2018) .... 17-3 Table 17A-3: Landscape Tracts summary table (Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, 2006) ....................................................................................................... 17-5 Table 17A-4: Landscape Character Areas Summary Table (Stockton on Tees Borough Council, 2011) ......................................................................................... 17-7 Table 17A-5: Landscape Character Types Summary Table (Hartlepool Borough Council, 2000)
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy 2013
    Area Management Regulatory Services Environmental Protection Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On April 1st 2000, Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (inserted into that Act by section 57 of the Environment Act 1995) came into force. The main objective requires local authorities to take a “strategic approach” to inspecting their areas to identify land where contamination is causing unacceptable risks to human health or the wider environment. This document is the second review and sets out the manner in which Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council proposes to implement its inspection duties under Part 2A in accordance with the revised Statutory Guidance issued by the Department of Environment and Rural Affairs in April 2012 which should be read in conjunction with this Strategy. This is a comprehensive review of the Strategy to reflect the many changes in contaminated land legislation and guidance published in the last few years. Using a bespoke software package (GeoEnviron) with the Council’s GIS system, contaminated land has been identified and prioritised. The Council identified landfill sites within the borough as highest priority for inspection due to problems from landfill gas, land stability and leachate pollution, potentially posing high risks to neighbouring occupants, and therefore concentrated resources in these areas. To-date, following successful funding bids to Defra, the Council has investigated 3 former landfill sites known to have domestic waste tipped and continues to monitor and manage gas at these sites to minimise the risk to nearby residents. From the work carried out to-date, no sites have been determined as contaminated land, under the definition stated within the statutory guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Painted and Described
    Yorkshire Painted And Described Gordon Home Project Gutenberg's Yorkshire Painted And Described, by Gordon Home This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Yorkshire Painted And Described Author: Gordon Home Release Date: August 13, 2004 [EBook #9973] Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK YORKSHIRE PAINTED AND DESCRIBED *** Produced by Ted Garvin, Michael Lockey and PG Distributed Proofreaders. Illustrated HTML file produced by David Widger YORKSHIRE PAINTED AND DESCRIBED BY GORDON HOME Contents CHAPTER I ACROSS THE MOORS FROM PICKERING TO WHITBY CHAPTER II ALONG THE ESK VALLEY CHAPTER III THE COAST FROM WHITBY TO REDCAR CHAPTER IV THE COAST FROM WHITBY TO SCARBOROUGH CHAPTER V Livros Grátis http://www.livrosgratis.com.br Milhares de livros grátis para download. SCARBOROUGH CHAPTER VI WHITBY CHAPTER VII THE CLEVELAND HILLS CHAPTER VIII GUISBOROUGH AND THE SKELTON VALLEY CHAPTER IX FROM PICKERING TO RIEVAULX ABBEY CHAPTER X DESCRIBES THE DALE COUNTRY AS A WHOLE CHAPTER XI RICHMOND CHAPTER XII SWALEDALE CHAPTER XIII WENSLEYDALE CHAPTER XIV RIPON AND FOUNTAINS ABBEY CHAPTER XV KNARESBOROUGH AND HARROGATE CHAPTER XVI WHARFEDALE CHAPTER XVII SKIPTON, MALHAM AND GORDALE CHAPTER XVIII SETTLE AND THE INGLETON FELLS CHAPTER XIX CONCERNING THE WOLDS CHAPTER XX FROM FILEY TO SPURN HEAD CHAPTER XXI BEVERLEY CHAPTER XXII ALONG THE HUMBER CHAPTER XXIII THE DERWENT AND THE HOWARDIAN HILLS CHAPTER XXIV A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF YORK CHAPTER XXV THE MANUFACTURING DISTRICT INDEX List of Illustrations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Thorntree Farm Busby, Stokesley, North Yorkshire
    Thorntree Farm Busby, Stokesley, North Yorkshire Thorntree Farm The front door opens to a traditional entrance hall, leading to the sitting room and breakfast Busby, Stokesley, kitchen to the left and right. North Yorkshire TS9 5LB The bright and airy breakfast kitchen features open beams and an abundance of natural A magnificent and light throughout. The large living space boasts bespoke and hand-painted units with a useful contemporary 6 bedroom centre island, finished with oak and granite Grade II listed farmhouse, work surfaces, integrated Bosch appliances and an AGA range cooker. French doors open impeccably presented with out to the stone patio which is an ideal outside planning permission to extend entertaining space. Double doors lead from the breakfast kitchen into the stunning garden further as well as potential to room with glass roof, which bathes the room in create equestrian facilities, set copious light. Two further sets of French doors to the front and rear open onto the generous within 11 acres with stunning stone patio areas. panoramic views The delightful sitting room, featuring wood Stokesley 2 miles, Yarm 9 miles, Teeside burning stove leads into a formal dining room 12 miles, Northallerton 13 miles, A19 (M) 5 miles with bespoke oak flooring; continuing into the superb drawing room; this generous room Entrance hall | Sitting room/cinema with has a feature fire place with an exposed brick mezzanine shower room | Snug | Dining room surround, stone hearth and a wood burning Drawing room | Breakfast kitchen | Garden room stove along with French doors that open onto Inner hall | Utility room | Ground floor bedroom the glorious gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Waste Core Strategy
    Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017
    Redcar & Cleveland Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017 this is Redcar & Cleveland 1 BACKGROUND 3 2 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES 5 3 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL GEOLOGICAL SITES 11 APPENDIX 1: Location Maps 15 2017 y anuar J te Upda Sites Geological and e ildlif W Local Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan 1 2 Local Wildlife and Geological Sites Update January 2017 R edcar & Cle v eland Local Plan 1. BACKGROUND What are Local Sites and why do we need them? 1.1 Local Sites can be Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) or Local Geological Sites (LGS). Local Wildlife Sites are areas of land which meet specific, objective criteria for nature conservation value. These criteria, which are based on the Defra guidance(1), have been decided locally by the Tees Valley Local Sites Partnership. The sites represent a range of important habitat types and variety of species that are of conservation concern. The Tees Valley RIGS (Regionally Important Geological Sites) group advises the Local Sites Partnership on the selection and management of Local Geological Sites, areas which they have identified as being of geological importance. 1.2 Local Sites can provide local contact with nature and opportunities for education, however designation as a Local Site does not confer any right of access. 1.3 Formerly known as Sites of Nature Conservation Interest (SNCIs) and RIGS, Local Sites are non-statutory site designations that have a lower level of protection than statutory designations, such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). Local Sites, excluding those within the North York Moors National Park, currently receive protection from certain types of inappropriate development through our Local Development Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yorkshire Matterhorn
    Viewpoint The Yorkshire Matterhorn Time: 15 mins Region: Yorkshire and the Humber Landscape: rural Location: National Trust car park at Roseberry Topping, off A173, near Newton under Roseberry, Cleveland, North York Moors, TS9 6QS Grid reference: NZ 57000 12800 Driving through the gently rolling landscape on the edge of the North York Moors, you cannot fail to notice the craggy peak of Roseberry Topping standing proudly like a church spire amongst a cluster of cottage rooftops. The hill is known locally as ‘the Yorkshire Matterhorn’ because its shape reminds people of the pyramidal peak of that mighty mountain. Straddling the Swiss and Italian border, and standing 4478m tall, the Matterhorn is one of Europe’s highest mountains. What has produced Roseberry Topping’s distinctive shape and made visitors think of a mountain over 965 miles away? There are two reasons for the curious profile of Roseberry Topping. The first is down to geology, or the rocks that make up this area. Roseberry Topping is rather like a layer cake, with bands of different rocks sitting one on top of the other. The base is sandstone, next is a layer of ironstone, then mudstone, and it is topped off with a sandstone cap. The other hills in the area are also layered from these stones, but most do not have a sandstone cap. Over the years wind, rain and ice have battered the local hills, slowly breaking down the rocks and washing them away in a process called erosion. This has left the rounded moors we see today. Sandstone, however, is a harder rock than the others in the area, so the cap on Roseberry Topping acted like a shield and gave it more protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Read 26Th September, 1908. Manuscript Received 5Th
    Downloaded from http://pygs.lyellcollection.org/ at UCLA on June 24, 2016 372 THE GLACIATION OF NORTH CLEVELAND. BY FRANK ELGEE. {Read 26th September, 1908. Manuscript received 5th December, 1908.) Thanks to the great work of Professor Kendall in the Cleve• land area, glacial geologists are now furnished with a key which will enable them to trace the history of the decline of the glaciers which debouched on to the plains of England during the Ice Age. Even in the area which he has made classic, work still remains to be done in deciphering the records of the various stages in the retreat of the ice from its position at maximum extension until it finally vanished from the district. The following notes, therefore, deal with the glacial phenomena produced during the retreat of the ice in North-west Cleveland, and embrace the Upleatham and Eston Outliers, the Guisborough Valley, and the Cleveland Plain of Stokesley. The phenomena to be discussed may be conveniently divided into three groups, corresponding chronologically to three positions of the ice margin, viz. :— 1. Phenomena at the period of maximum extension. 2. Phenomena at the foot of the Cleveland Hills during the retreat. 3. Phenomena connected with a halt of the ice on the Plain of Stokesley. The phenomena at the period of maximum extension have been fully elucidated by Professor Kendall, and are mentioned here so that what follows may be fully understood. There can be little question that he has conclusively established the existence in Cleveland, during the later phases of the Ice Age, of a large glacier that had passed over a part of the Cheviot Hills.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Template
    Document Ref: 8.61 PINS Ref: EN010082 Tees CCPP Project The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Project Land at the Wilton International Site, Teesside Stack Diameter Sensitivity Study Applicant: Sembcorp Utilities UK Date: September 2018 Version: 1 CONTENTS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 BACKGROUND 1 1.3 MODELLING APPROACH 2 1.4 RESULTS 2 1 STACK DIAMETER SENSITIVITY STUDY 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Within the Development Consent Order (‘DCO’) there is a desire to maintain flexibility in the final power plant design, as this has not yet been confirmed. One item which requires this flexibility is the final internal stack diameter. Flexibility is required as the diameter may change from the current 8.0 metres (‘m’), depending upon the final specification of the plant and turbines that would be used. During the examination process, the question has been raised as to what difference would arise in environmental impacts if the stack diameter is varied. Small changes in environmental impacts can be potentially significant. This is because nearby sensitive ecological receptors are subject to baseline conditions that are in excess of the Critical Load, and therefore there is only a small degree of ‘headroom’ for additional impacts. 1.2 The current impact assessment for the Project uses an 8.0m internal diameter stack and identifies that impacts at all relevant ecological receptors are below the threshold of potentially significant impacts (Refer to the No Significant Effects Report REP1-001). Notwithstanding this, care needs to be taken around any design commitments that could potentially increase these impacts. 1.2 BACKGROUND 1.3 Dispersion modelling has been undertaken for the Environmental Impact Assessment (‘EIA’) for the Proposed Power Plant, consisting of two 850MWthermal gas turbines.
    [Show full text]