DOCSLIB.ORG

Anheuser-Busch Inbev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anheuser-Busch Inbev Sustainability Guide 2013 Company and Sector Analysis of the STOXX® Europe 50 Index Featuring the new Inrate Sustainability Assessment Impact is at the heart of the Inrate Sustainability Analysis Foreword The publication of the 2013 Inrate Sustainability Guide of companies and sectors in the STOXX® EUROPE 50 index is an important step in the validation of our work. It is the outcome of a three year Research and Development project which has brought to fruition developments in our methodology we have long believed in. Sustainability analysis is often criticized, for focusing too much on the facade erected by companies rather than on the Philippe Spicher, true impact of the building which lies behind it. This approach CEO Inrate was perhaps justified in the beginning, when sustainability initiatives reflected a genuine awareness and commitment on the part of companies. But as soon as environmental and so- first analyze and understand a company’s business activi- cial communication became fashionable it was often the case ties as well as the environmental and social issues at stake. the more the building was cracked, the more the facade was For example, child labor is a fundamental issue for clothing decorated. brands and chocolate manufacturers but it is marginal for many other companies. Global warming affects the entire The phenomenon of green washing is one reason why highly economy but not always to the same extent. To complicate controversial companies are sometimes found at the top of matters further, few companies are confined to a single busi- current sustainability rankings. Another reason is the im- ness activity and many companies have diversified their busi- proper application of best-in-class methodology which sim- ness over several industries. ply establishes industry rankings (and not true sustainability). A portfolio may include an oil company with a slightly higher The developments in our methodology, which form the back- ranking than its peers but exclude a software company with a bone to the 2013 Sustainability Guide, were not undertaken lower peer group ranking for purely sector allocation reasons. lightly and we are particularly proud of what we have achieved. But the software company is inherently more sustainable But our efforts will not stop here: we are committed to further than the oil company and any sustainability analysis needs to innovation and development so we can address the needs of reflect that fact. the broader investment industry by focusing on the issues of materiality and the financial risks related to sustainability. We That is why Inrate places the environmental and social impact look forward to sharing these developments with you in due at the heart of its sustainability analysis. It means we must course. Inrate Sustainability Assessment 1 Table of contents Interview with Tobias Jung: “Inrate identifies • Daimler ............................................................................ 39 market players which are on a sustainable path” .... 4 • Deutsche Bank .............................................................. 40 • Deutsche Telekom ......................................................... 41 Overview of the STOXX® Europe 50 sectors ............... 7 • Diageo .............................................................................. 42 • E.ON ................................................................................. 43 • Chemical sector ............................................................ 8 • ENI .................................................................................... 44 • Clothing sector .............................................................. 9 • Ericsson .......................................................................... 45 • Communication sector ................................................ 10 • GlaxoSmithKline ........................................................... 46 • Energy sector ................................................................. 11 • Glencore Xstrata ........................................................... 47 • Financial services sector ............................................ 12 • HSBC ................................................................................ 48 • Health sector ................................................................. 13 • Imperial Tobacco Group ............................................... 49 • Household and personal products sector ............... 14 • ING Group ....................................................................... 50 • IT equipment and electronics sector ........................ 15 • LVMH ................................................................................ 51 • Machinery and industrial equipment sector .......... 16 • National Grid .................................................................. 52 • Nutrition sector ............................................................. 17 • Nestlé .............................................................................. 53 • Resources sector .......................................................... 18 • Novartis ........................................................................... 54 • Software sector ............................................................. 19 • Reckitt Benckiser .......................................................... 55 • Transportation sector .................................................. 20 • Rio Tinto .......................................................................... 56 • Roche ............................................................................... 57 Overview of the STOXX® Europe 50 • Royal Dutch - Shell ....................................................... 58 companies ........................................................................... 21 • Sanofi-Aventis ............................................................... 59 • SAP ................................................................................... 60 • ABB ................................................................................... 22 • Schneider Electric ........................................................ 61 • Air Liquide ....................................................................... 23 • Siemens .......................................................................... 62 • Allianz .............................................................................. 24 • Standard Chartered ..................................................... 63 • Anheuser-Busch InBev ................................................ 25 • Telefonica ........................................................................ 64 • AstraZeneca ................................................................... 26 • Tesco ................................................................................ 65 • Banco Santander .......................................................... 27 • Total ................................................................................. 66 • Barclays .......................................................................... 28 • UBS .................................................................................. 67 • BASF ................................................................................ 29 • Unilever ........................................................................... 68 • Bayer ................................................................................ 30 • Vodafone ......................................................................... 69 • BBVA ................................................................................ 31 • Zurich Insurance Group ............................................... 70 • BG Group ......................................................................... 32 • BHP Billiton .................................................................... 33 Disclosures ......................................................................... 71 • BNP Paribas ................................................................... 34 • BP ..................................................................................... 35 Inrate analyst team • British American Tobacco ........................................... 36 and sector responsibilities ............................................. 72 • Compagnie Fin. Richemont ......................................... 37 • Credit Suisse Group ...................................................... 38 Inrate contacts .................................................................. 74 Inrate Sustainability Assessment 3 “Inrate identifies market players which are on a sustainable path” Interview with Tobias Jung, Head of Research, on the methodology of the new Inrate Sustainability Assessment Inrate assesses sectors and companies. What’s the conceptual basis for your company assessment? Assessing the sustainability performance starts with a proper understanding of the company and its activities. For that, we categorize the various activities of a company according to a proprietary classification. Based on our analysis of sectors, we then identify the most relevant sustainability challenges that the company faces. Tobias Jung, Head of Research We assess the impact of the company on environment and so- ciety. This includes the impact of its operations, of its supply chain and of its products once they’re in the hands of consum- ers. Furthermore, we analyze what steps the company under- What’s the consequence of this? takes to monitor
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2013--Annual-Report-Accounts.Pdf
    Helping people make measurable progress in their lives through learning ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2013 OUR TRANSFORMATION To find out more about how we are transforming our business go to page 09 EFFICACY To find out more about our focus on efficacy go to page 14 OUR PERFORMANCE For an in-depth analysis of our performance in 2013 go to page 19 Pearson is the world’s leading learning company, with 40,000 employees in more than 80 countries working to help people of all ages to make measurable progress in their lives through learning. We provide learning materials, technologies, assessments and services to teachers and students in order to help people everywhere aim higher and fulfil their true potential. We put the learner at the centre of everything we do. READ OUR REPORT ONLINE Learn more www.pearson.com/ar2013.html/ar2013.html To stay up to date wwithith PPearsonearson throughout the year,r, visit ouourr blog at blog.pearson.comn.com and follow us on Twitteritter – @pearsonplc 01 Heading one OVERVIEW Overview 02 Financial highlights A summary of who we are and what 04 Chairman’s introduction 1 we do, including performance highlights, 06 Our business models our business strategy and key areas of 09 Chief executive’s strategic overview investment and focus. 14 Pearson’s commitment to efficacy OUR PERFORMANCE OUR Our performance 19 Our performance An in-depth analysis of how we 20 Outlook 2014 2 performed in 2013, the outlook 23 Education: North America, International, Professional for 2014 and the principal risks and 32 Financial Times Group uncertainties affecting our businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Rb-Annual-Report-2012.Pdf
    Reckitt Benckiser Group plc Reckitt Benckiser Group Healthier Happier Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012 Stronger Reckitt Benckiser Group plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012 Contents 1 Chairman’s Statement 2 Chief Executive’s Statement 10 Business Review 2012 18 Board of Directors and Executive Committee 19 Report of the Directors 22 Chairman’s Statement on Corporate Governance 24 Corporate Governance Report 30 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 31 Directors’ Remuneration Report 38 Independent Auditors’ Report to the members of Reckitt Benckiser Group plc 39 Group income statement 39 Group statement of comprehensive income 40 Group balance sheet 41 Group statement of changes in equity 42 Group cash flow statement 43 Notes to the financial statements 75 Five-year summary 76 Parent Company – Independent Auditors’ Report to the members of Reckitt Benckiser Group plc 77 Parent Company balance sheet 78 Notes to the Parent Company financial statements 84 Shareholder information Chairman’s Statement largest consumer health care category in The Board conducted its regular reviews the world with the acquisition of Schiff of the Company’s brands, geographic area Nutrition International, Inc. (Schiff) and and functional performance together with its leading US brands in the vitamins, detailed reviews of its human resources. minerals and supplements market. There The Board also completed its annual were also a few disposals of non core assessment of corporate governance assets. Net debt at the end of 2012, after including Board performance, corporate paying for dividends, net acquisitions and responsibility, and reputational and organisation restructuring, stood at business risk. £2,426m (2011: £1,795m). AGM Resolutions Your Board proposes an increase in the final The resolutions, which will be voted dividend of +11%, taking it to 78p per upon at our AGM of 2 May 2013 are share, and bringing the total dividend for fully explained in the Notice of Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Betterbusiness Betterfinancials How We Drive Growth and Outperformance
    Reckitt Benckiser Group plc Annual Report and Financial2015 Statements betterbusiness 2015 Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RB) Annual Report and Financial Statements We make a difference to people’s lives through a trusted portfolio of brands, across consumer health, hygiene and home. Our vision Our purpose A world where people are To make a difference, by healthier and live better. giving people innovative solutions for healthier lives and happier homes. Our strategy betterbusiness betterfinancials How we drive growth and outperformance Chief Executive’s Review on pages 8–9 bettersociety betterenvironment How we support How we reduce our communities and our environmental develop our people impact Strategic framework on pages 12–13 Contents Strategic Report bettersociety Governance Report 1 Highlights 24 – Workplace 46 Board of Directors 2 At a glance 26 – Communities 50 Executive Committee 4 Chairman’s Statement 26 – Products 52 Chairman’s Statement on 7 Reasons why RB delivers betterenvironment Corporate Governance 8 Chief Executive’s Review 27 – Greenhouse gas emissions 54 Corporate Governance Statement 10 Our unique culture 28 – Water 60 Nomination Committee Report 12 Strategic framework 28 – Waste 61 Audit Committee Report 14 Our market and resources 29 – Sourcing 66 Directors’ Remuneration Report betterfinancials 30 Our operating model 68 Our remuneration at a glance 16 – Our strategy to deliver 32 Our operating model in action 70 Annual Report on Remuneration 17 – Organisation 34 Creating stakeholder value 79 Directors’ Remuneration Policy 19 – Powermarkets 36 Financial Review 85 Report of the Directors 20 – Powerbrands 40 Strategic Risks 88 Directors’ Statement of Responsibilities 22 – Virtuous earnings model Financial Statements 89 Financial Statements Any information contained in the 2015 Annual Report and Financial Statements on the price at which shares or other securities in Reckitt Benckiser Group plc have been bought or sold in the past, or on the yield on such shares or other securities, should not be relied upon as a guide to future performance.
    [Show full text]
  • SAP® SOLUTIONS and ACCOUNTING STRATEGIES © Copyright 2007 SAP AG
    SAP Solution in Detail SAP for Banking ACCOUNTING IN BANKS: SAP® SOLUTIONS AND ACCOUNTING STRATEGIES © Copyright 2007 SAP AG. All rights reserved. HTML, XML, XHTML and W3C are trademarks or registered trademarks of W3C®, World Wide Web Consortium, No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in Massachusetts Institute of Technology. any form or for any purpose without the express permission of SAP AG. The information contained herein may be changed Java is a registered trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc. without prior notice. JavaScript is a registered trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc., Some software products marketed by SAP AG and its distributors used under license for technology invented and implemented contain proprietary software components of other software by Netscape. vendors. MaxDB is a trademark of MySQL AB, Sweden. Microsoft, Windows, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. SAP, R/3, mySAP, mySAP.com, xApps, xApp, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, PartnerEdge, and other SAP products and services IBM, DB2, DB2 Universal Database, OS/2, Parallel Sysplex, mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks MVS/ESA, AIX, S/390, AS/400, OS/390, OS/400, iSeries, pSeries, or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several xSeries, zSeries, System i, System i5, System p, System p5, System x, other countries all over the world. All other product and System z, System z9, z/OS, AFP, Intelligent Miner, WebSphere, service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective Netfinity, Tivoli, Informix, i5/OS, POWER, POWER5, POWER5+, companies. Data contained in this document serves informational OpenPower and PowerPC are trademarks or registered purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitch Ratings ING Groep N.V. Ratings Report 2020-10-15
    Banks Universal Commercial Banks Netherlands ING Groep N.V. Ratings Foreign Currency Long-Term IDR A+ Short-Term IDR F1 Derivative Counterparty Rating A+(dcr) Viability Rating a+ Key Rating Drivers Support Rating 5 Support Rating Floor NF Robust Company Profile, Solid Capitalisation: ING Groep N.V.’s ratings are supported by its leading franchise in retail and commercial banking in the Benelux region and adequate Sovereign Risk diversification in selected countries. The bank's resilient and diversified business model Long-Term Local- and Foreign- AAA emphasises lending operations with moderate exposure to volatile businesses, and it has a Currency IDRs sound record of earnings generation. The ratings also reflect the group's sound capital ratios Country Ceiling AAA and balanced funding profile. Outlooks Pandemic Stress: ING has enough rating headroom to absorb the deterioration in financial Long-Term Foreign-Currency Negative performance due to the economic fallout from the coronavirus crisis. The Negative Outlook IDR reflects the downside risks to Fitch’s baseline scenario, as pressure on the ratings would Sovereign Long-Term Local- and Negative increase substantially if the downturn is deeper or more prolonged than we currently expect. Foreign-Currency IDRs Asset Quality: The Stage 3 loan ratio remained sound at 2% at end-June 2020 despite the economic disruption generated by the lockdowns in the countries where ING operates. Fitch Applicable Criteria expects higher inflows of impaired loans from 4Q20 as the various support measures mature, driven by SMEs and mid-corporate borrowers and more vulnerable sectors such as oil and gas, Bank Rating Criteria (February 2020) shipping and transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2018
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2018. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Or ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 Or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Or SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report ____________ For the transition period from N/A to N/A Commission file number: 001-14930 HSBC Holdings plc (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) N/A United Kingdom (Translation of Registrant’s name into English) (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) 8 Canada Square London E14 5HQ United Kingdom (Address of principal executive offices) Gavin A Francis 8 Canada Square London E14 5HQ United Kingdom Tel +44 (0) 20 7991 8888 Fax +44 (0) 20 7992 4880 (Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Ordinary Shares, nominal value US$0.50 each. London Stock Exchange Hong Kong Stock Exchange Euronext Paris Bermuda Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange* American Depository Shares, each representing 5 New York Stock Exchange Ordinary Shares of nominal value US$0.50 each.
    [Show full text]
  • Fund Holdings
    Wilmington International Fund as of 7/31/2021 (Portfolio composition is subject to change) ISSUER NAME % OF ASSETS ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 3.48% TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD 2.61% DREYFUS GOVT CASH MGMT-I 1.83% SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.79% SPDR S&P GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES ETF 1.67% MSCI INDIA FUTURE SEP21 1.58% TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 1.39% ASML HOLDING NV 1.29% DSV PANALPINA A/S 0.99% HDFC BANK LTD 0.86% AIA GROUP LTD 0.86% ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 0.82% TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO LTD 0.79% JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES PLC 0.78% DREYFUS GOVT CASH MGMT-I 0.75% INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 0.74% SIKA AG 0.72% NOVO NORDISK A/S 0.71% BHP GROUP LTD 0.69% PARTNERS GROUP HOLDING AG 0.65% NAVER CORP 0.61% HUTCHMED CHINA LTD 0.59% LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE 0.59% TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 0.59% HEXAGON AB 0.57% SAP SE 0.57% SK MATERIALS CO LTD 0.55% MEDIATEK INC 0.55% ADIDAS AG 0.54% ZALANDO SE 0.54% RIO TINTO LTD 0.52% MERIDA INDUSTRY CO LTD 0.52% HITACHI LTD 0.51% CSL LTD 0.51% SONY GROUP CORP 0.50% ATLAS COPCO AB 0.49% DASSAULT SYSTEMES SE 0.49% OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORP LTD 0.49% KINGSPAN GROUP PLC 0.48% L'OREAL SA 0.48% ASSA ABLOY AB 0.46% JD.COM INC 0.46% RESMED INC 0.44% COLOPLAST A/S 0.44% CRODA INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.41% AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD 0.41% STRAUMANN HOLDING AG 0.41% AMBU A/S 0.40% LG CHEM LTD 0.40% LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE 0.39% SOFTBANK GROUP CORP 0.39% NOVARTIS AG 0.38% HONDA MOTOR CO LTD 0.37% TOMRA SYSTEMS ASA 0.37% IMCD NV 0.37% HONG KONG EXCHANGES & CLEARING LTD 0.36% AGC INC 0.36% ADYEN
    [Show full text]
  • ING Pressrelease
    Press release Corporate Communications Amsterdam, 25 February 2021 ING appoints Anne-Sophie Castelnau global head of Sustainability Anne-Sophie Castelnau has been appointed ING’s global head of Sustainability per 1 April 2021. She will succeed Amin Mansour, who fulfilled the role on an interim basis. Anne-Sophie is currently head of Wholesale Banking for ING in France. Anne-Sophie Castelnau (French) joined ING in France in 2005. Before she became head of Wholesale Banking in France, she held various senior management positions, including head of Corporate Lending and head of Client Coverage. Before she joined ING, Anne-Sophie worked for French banks Natixis and Crédit Industriel et Commercial. Since she became head of ING Wholesale Banking in France in 2017, Anne-Sophie has had a strong focus on sustainable finance. She has been involved in bringing over 25 sustainability deals to fruition, including the first sustainability linked loan in France in 2017. Announcements on Anne-Sophie’s successor as head of Wholesale Banking in France will be made as and when appropriate. Note for editors For further information on ING, please visit www.ing.com. Frequent news updates can be found in the Newsroom or via the @ING_news Twitter feed. Photos of ING operations, buildings and its executives are available for download at Flickr. ING presentations are available at SlideShare. Press enquiries Investor enquiries Daan Wentholt ING Group Investor Relations +31 20 576 6386 +31 20 576 6396 [email protected] [email protected] ING PROFILE ING is a global financial institution with a strong European base, offering banking services through its operating company ING Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Rb-Annual-Report-2017.Pdf
    Reckitt Benckiser Group plc(RB) Healthier Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 Statements Financial and Report Annual Lives, Happier Homes Bringing Our Purpose to Life Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RB) Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 RB is inspired by a vision of a world where people are healthier and live better. We continually invest and innovate to find new ways for people to look after themselves, their families and their homes. We believe passionately in doing things the right way and have a culture that pushes us to outperform, every day. Contents Strategic Report Transformation of RB page 01 Highlights 02 Our business model 04 Chairman’s Statement 6 06 Chief Executive’s Statement 10 Strategic objectives, targets and key performance indicators 14 betterbusiness in action 20 bettersociety in action 22 betterenvironment in action 24 Operating review 30 Megatrends 32 Health 34 Hygiene Home Strategy page 36 Financial review 42 Our framework for risk management betterbusiness 10 Governance 52 Board of Directors 56 Executive Committee bettersociety 58 Corporate Governance– Chairman’s Statement 61 Corporate Governance Statement betterenvironment 69 Nomination Committee Report 71 Audit Committee Report 76 Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, Ethics and Compliance Committee Report Mead Johnson Nutrition Sale of 78 Directors’ Remuneration Report integration RB Food 82 Remuneration Policy at a glance 83 Implementation of specific commitments made to page Shareholders for 2017 84 Annual Report on Remuneration 95 Report
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Ftse4good UK 50
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE4Good UK 50 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.81 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 5.08 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.67 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 2.56 UNITED Halma 0.74 UNITED Rio Tinto 4.68 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.36 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 6.17 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 4.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.56 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.64 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 3.75 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 8.25 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.47 UNITED Schroders 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 1.15 UNITED Intertek Group 0.65 UNITED Segro 0.95 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Barclays 2.1 UNITED Legal & General Group 1.1 UNITED Smith & Nephew 0.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.2 UNITED Lloyds Banking Group 2.39 UNITED Smurfit Kappa Group 0.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BT Group 1.23 UNITED London Stock Exchange Group 2.09 UNITED Spirax-Sarco Engineering 0.72 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.6 UNITED Mondi 0.67 UNITED SSE 1.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Coca-Cola HBC AG 0.37 UNITED National Grid 2.37 UNITED Standard Chartered 0.85 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Compass Group 1.96 UNITED Natwest Group 0.77 UNITED Tesco 1.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM CRH 2.08 UNITED Next 0.72 UNITED Unilever 7.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from FRS17 Disclosures
    Is Pension Fund Asset Allocation Really Determined by Fundamentals? Mike Orszag W W W . W A T S O N W Y A T T . C O M Paris, April 2, 2004 Key Question z Do pension funds make asset allocation decisions based on corporate finance risk considerations? z Factors which might matter: – Size of pension scheme relative to company – Size of deficits relative to company – Maturity of scheme Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide. All rights reserved. Data z UK listed companies have had to report pension liabilities on FRS17 basis since late 2001 z Collected roughly 150 data items for FTSE350 on corporate finance from FRS17 disclosures z Matched data to other data on market returns/option price data, betas, etc. Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide. All rights reserved. Accounting Dates z Roughly 48% of FTSE350 (168 companies) use Dec. 31 as end of year, 17% (60 companies) use 31 March, 8% (29 companies) use 30 September, remainder use a variety of dates z Define a panel with two waves: – 2001 Wave = Accounting dates between 30 June 2001 and 29 June 2002 – 2002 Wave = Accounting dates between 30 June 2002 and 29 June 2003 Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide. All rights reserved. Pension Surplus(Deficit)/Pension Liabilities FTSE 350 companies with positive reported pension liabilities 2001 2002 Wave 2002 has 5% -30% -48.1% only 10 10% -24.9% -43.7% companies with 25% -15.2% -34.0% surpluses as 50% -7.7% -27.4% opposed to 81 in 2001. 75% 3.3% -17.3% Among FTSE 90% 15.5% -8.3% 100, wave 2001 95% 21.8% -1.0% has only 4 companies in surplus as N 242 257 opposed to 46 in 2001 Copyright © Watson Wyatt Worldwide.
    [Show full text]