DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Monica Airport Park Draft Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Santa Monica Airport Park Draft Environmental Impact Report SANTA MONICA AIRPORT PARK DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (State Clearinghouse No. 2001081096) Prepared for: CITY OF SANTA MONICA Department of Community and Cultural Services 1685 Main Street, Room 210 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Contact: Karen Ginsberg Prepared under City direction by: CULBERTSON, ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 85 Argonaut, Suite 220 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656-4105 Volume I July 2002 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Description Summary..........................................................................................1-1 1.2 Summary of Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Unavoidable Adverse Impacts............1-2 1.3 Project Alternatives........................................................................................................1-10 1.4 Areas of Controversy/Issues to Be Resolved.................................................................1-10 1.5 Issues Raised by Agencies and the Public .....................................................................1-11 1.6 Organizations Affiliated with the Project ......................................................................1-11 1.7 Incorporation by Reference............................................................................................1-13 1.8 Impacts Found Not To Be Significant ...........................................................................1-13 1.9 Agencies Expected to Use This EIR..............................................................................1-14 2.0 Introduction and Purpose ..............................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Environmental Overview.................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Statutory Authority ..........................................................................................................2-2 2.3 EIR Scope ........................................................................................................................2-2 3.0 Project Description........................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Project Characteristics .....................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Project Site History..........................................................................................................3-5 3.3 Project Location...............................................................................................................3-5 3.4 Project Objectives..........................................................................................................3-10 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals ...................................................................................3-11 3.6 Project Timing ...............................................................................................................3-11 4.0 Project Setting...............................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Existing Site Conditions ..................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Surrounding Land Uses ...................................................................................................4-3 4.3 Cumulative Impacts .........................................................................................................4-5 5.0 Environmental Analysis................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................5-3 5.1.1 Existing Conditions.............................................................................................5-3 5.1.2 Thresholds of Significance ...............................................................................5-12 5.1.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-13 5.1.4 Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................5-16 5.1.5 Cumulative Impacts ..........................................................................................5-16 5.1.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts..........................................................................5-16 5.2 Air Quality .....................................................................................................................5-17 5.2.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................5-17 5.2.2 Thresholds of Significance ...............................................................................5-22 5.2.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-25 5.2.4 Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................5-35 5.2.5 Cumulative Impacts ..........................................................................................5-35 5.2.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts..........................................................................5-35 5.3 Hydrology and Water Quality........................................................................................5-37 5.3.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................5-37 5.3.2 Threshold of Significance.................................................................................5-38 Santa Monica Airport Park EIR i rev. July 2002 5.3.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-38 5.3.4 Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................5-41 5.3.5 Cumulative Impacts ..........................................................................................5-41 5.3.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts..........................................................................5-42 5.4 Noise 5-43 5.4.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................5-48 5.4.2 Thresholds of Significance ...............................................................................5-51 5.4.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-52 5.4.4 Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................5-60 5.4.5 Cumulative Impacts ..........................................................................................5-61 5.4.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts..........................................................................5-61 5.5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................5-63 5.5.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................5-63 5.5.2 Thresholds of Significance ...............................................................................5-66 5.5.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-66 5.5.4 Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................5-70 5.5.5 Cumulative Impacts ..........................................................................................5-71 5.5.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts..........................................................................5-71 5.6 Land Use and Planning..................................................................................................5-72 5.6.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................5-72 5.6.2 Thresholds of Significance ...............................................................................5-78 5.6.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-80 5.6.4 Mitigation Measures .........................................................................................5-84 5.6.5 Cumulative Impacts ..........................................................................................5-85 5.6.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts..........................................................................5-85 5.7 Transportation/Traffic....................................................................................................5-86 5.7.1 Existing Conditions...........................................................................................5-88 5.7.2 Thresholds of Significance ...............................................................................5-94 5.7.3 Project Impacts .................................................................................................5-97 5.7.4 Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................5-109 5.7.5 Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................................5-109 5.7.6 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts........................................................................5-110
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdictional Dams Listed Alphabetically by Reservoir Name
    State of California California Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Division of Safety of Dams Jurisdictional Dams Dams Listed Alphabetically by Reservoir Name Reservoir Name Dam Name Dam Number County Adobe Reservoir Adobe Creek 1011-0 Lake Alisal Reservoir Alisal Creek 756-0 Santa Barbara Almaden Reservoir Almaden 72-4 Santa Clara Aloha, Lake Medley Lakes 53-11 El Dorado Amador, Lake Jackson Creek 1035-0 Amador Anderson Reservoir Leroy Anderson 72-9 Santa Clara Antelope Huffman Antelope 112-2 Modoc Antelope Lake Antelope 1-50 Plumas Antioch Municipal Antioch Reservoir 3-0 Contra Costa Araujo Reservoir 2 Araujo Reservoir No. 2 5413-2 Napa Araujo Reservoir No. 1 Araujo Reservoir No. 1 5413-0 Napa Arnold Reservoir Chino Ranch #1 2025-0 San Bernardino Atascadero Lake Atascadero Park 740-0 San Luis Obispo Avanzino A and C 1110-2 Modoc Ballard Reservoir Toreson 153-0 Modoc BAP Pond 5 BAP Pond 5 738-6 Kern BAP Pond 6 BAP Pond 6 738-7 Kern Bard Lake Wood Ranch 1027-0 Ventura Barry Reservoir Mardis Barry 1228-2 Lassen Barton Lake Barton 1181-2 Siskiyou Bass Lake Bass Lake 1-85 Siskiyou Bass Lake Crane Valley Storage 95-3 Madera Bass Lake New Bass Lake 1469-0 El Dorado Baum, Lake Hat Creek #2 Diversion 97-109 Shasta Bear Creek Lake Whispering Oaks 1671-0 Mariposa Belden Forebay Caribou Afterbay 97-120 Plumas Bell Canyon Reservoir Bell Canyon 16-3 Napa Berenda Slough Berenda Slough 1015-0 Madera Bethany Reservoir Bethany Forebay 1-45 Alameda Big Bear Lake Bear Valley 2015-0 San Bernardino Big Dalton Reservoir Big Dalton 32-0 Los Angeles Jurisdictional Dams Dams Listed Alphabetically by Reservoir Name Page 2 of 12 Reservoir Name Dam Name Dam Number County Big Pine Lake Big Pine Creek 6-11 Inyo Big Reservoir Morning Star 325-0 Placer Big Sage Reservoir Big Sage 55-0 Modoc Big Tujunga Reservoir Big Tujunga No.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Ca Water Quality Reports 2011
    2011 Drinking Water Quality Report Quality in Every Drop James B. McDaniel Senior Assistant General Manager - Water Dr. Pankaj Parekh Director of Water Quality or over 100 years, LADWP years. Thanks to a recently approved Long-term investments in water has been the steward of adjustment to our water rates, we can conservation, stormwater capture, our City’s water system and ensure funding for several of these water recycling, and groundwater Fsupply. It’s a responsibility critical water quality projects. Approved cleanup will reduce our reliance we take very seriously. Every day, we on February 1, 2012, the 35-cent per on imported water and will provide import raw water, purify it and deliver billing unit increase to water rates, greater stability in the price of it to your tap 24-hours a day—all for discussed later in this report, will water for the future. Investments less than a penny per gallon. It’s our provide much-needed funding for major to develop local water supplies and duty to maintain the value of this water quality investments. uphold water quality, in addition to precious resource, and to comply with As we continue to uphold the safety needed investments in replacing increasingly stringent state and federal and quality of LA’s drinking water, aging pipeline, will enable LADWP to water quality mandates that protect LADWP is also working to make it more maintain Los Angeles’ water system every drop of the water we deliver. sustainable and protect its affordability. and ensure the availability and affordability of clean, reliable drinking In 2011, every drop of the more than water for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 145 P&O Committee Meeting March 2, 2015
    MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY Jointly with the PLANNING & OPERATIONS COMMITTEE March 2, 2015, 8:30 a.m. MWDOC Conference Room 101 P&O Committee: Staff: R. Hunter, K. Seckel, R. Bell, Director Osborne, Chair H. De La Torre, P. Meszaros, J. Berg Director Barbre Director Hinman Ex Officio Member: L. Dick MWDOC Committee meetings are noticed and held as joint meetings of the Committee and the entire Board of Directors and all members of the Board of Directors may attend and participate in the discussion. Each Committee has designated Committee members, and other members of the Board are designated alternate committee members. If less than a quorum of the full Board is in attendance, the Board meeting will be adjourned for lack of a quorum and the meeting will proceed as a meeting of the Committee with those Committee members and alternate members in attendance acting as the Committee. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Public comments on agenda items and items under the jurisdiction of the Committee should be made at this time. ITEMS RECEIVED TOO LATE TO BE AGENDIZED - Determine there is a need to take immediate action on item(s) and that the need for action came to the attention of the District subsequent to the posting of the Agenda. (Requires a unanimous vote of the Committee) ITEMS DISTRIBUTED TO THE BOARD LESS THAN 72 HOURS PRIOR TO MEETING -- Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items and are distributed to a majority of the Board less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available for public inspection in the lobby of the District’s business office located at 18700 Ward Street, Fountain Valley, California 92708, during regular business hours.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Los Angeles in Los Angeles County, California
    Los Angeles Unified School District Office of Environmental Health and Safety MICHELLE KING THELMA MELÉNDEZ, PH.D. Chief Executive Officer, Office of Educational Services Superintendent of Schools ROBERT LAUGHTON Director, Environmental Health and Safety CARLOS A. TORRES Deputy Director, Environmental Health and Safety MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD or District) has completed an Initial Study for the Ocean Charter Schools’ proposed Panama Street K-8 School project (proposed project). The Initial Study was completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations §§ 15000 et seq.). Based on the Initial Study with mitigation the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, this Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared for the proposed project. LEAD AGENCY: Los Angeles Unified School District, Office of Environmental Health and Safety, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, 21st Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017 PROJECT PROPONENT: Ocean Charter School (OCS), 12606 Culver Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90066 PROJECT TITLE: Panama Street K-8 Charter School PROJECT LOCATION: The site is at 12870 and 12908 Panama Street (Assessor Parcel Numbers [APNs] 4223- 008-003 [12870] and 4223-008-004 [12908]) in the community of Del Rey in the City of Los Angeles in Los Angeles County, California. Regional access to the site is from Marina Expressway via Culver Boulevard. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site currently houses Teledyne Microelectronics Technologies in a 17,400-square- foot, one-story industrial building; four accessory buildings; and several metal cargo containers and storage sheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Save Stone Canyon from the Dwp’S Colossal Project
    SAVE STONE CANYON FROM THE DWP’S COLOSSAL PROJECT The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has initiated plans to demolish the uncovered Upper Stone Canyon Reservoir and replace it with a buried concrete storage structure, located within the existing reservoir area, but with 30% less storage capacity. After destroying the Upper Reservoir, the DWP intends to dig a giant hole and build three immense underground concrete storage tanks. After construction has been completed, the DWP intends to plant the area where the Upper Reservoir used to exist and open the area to the public for unsupervised passive recreation activities. It is beyond dispute that the size, scope and cost of this colossal project will have a devastating impact on our community both during the period of construction and after the project has been completed. During the estimated 7-10 years of construction, the residents of the community will be forced to endure a substantial and unnecessary increase in noise, pollution and traffic. Our quality of life will be greatly diminished and our property values will likely decline. Wildlife will be displaced or destroyed, and the risk of a major wildfire would be vastly increased. During a recent meeting with the community, the DWP confirmed that: • The project will take 7-10 years to complete . • It will require 24,000 truck trips and the grading of 29,000,000 cubic feet of dirt within Stone Canyon. • Construction activities will take place 6 days a week , beginning at 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Beneficial Use Table
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Table 2-1. Beneficial Uses of Inland Surface Waters. Hydro WATERSHEDa MUN IND PROC AGR GWR FRSH NAV POW REC1 LREC1 REC2 COMM AQUA WARM COLD SAL EST MAR WILD BIOL RARE MIGR SPWN SHELL WETb GIS Code Unit No. VENTURA COUNTY COASTAL STREAMS Los Sauces Creek 401.00 P* I I I I I I I I E I I Poverty Canyon 401.00 P* I I I I I I I I E I I Madranio Canyon 401.00 P* I I I I I I I I E I I Javon Canyon 401.00 P* I I I I I I I I E I I E Padre Juan Canyon 401.00 P* I I I I I I I I E I I McGrath Lake c 403.11 Ed Ed P E E Ee E Big Sycamore Canyon Creek 404.47 P* I I I I E E P P E Little Sycamore Canyon Creek 404.45 P* I I I E E P VENTURA RIVER WATERSHED E Ventura River Estuary c 402.10 E E EE E EEE Ee Ef Ef E E CA402.0000E Ventura River 402.10 P* E EEE E E EE E EEE E ? Ventura River 402.20 E E E E E E E E EE E Eg E E E ? Canada Larga 402.10 P* I I I I I I II E II Lake Casitas 402.20 E E E E P P P Ph E EE E E N/A Lake Casitas tributaries 402.20 E* PE E E EE E PEE E N/A Coyote Creek below dam 402.20 P* E P EE E EE E ? San Antonio Creek 402.20 E E E E E E E EE E EE E ? San Antonio Creek 402.32 E E E E E E E E EE E EE E ? Lion
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge (CSUN) Oviatt Library Map Collection
    California State University, Northridge (CSUN) Oviatt Library Map Collection Title: Flood Insurance Rate Map Collection Dates (Inclusive): 1979-2004 Dates (Bulk): 1980s-1990s Collection Number: MC/03 Creator/Collector: California State University, Northridge (CSUN). Geography Department Extent: 2 linear feet (2 boxes); 300+ items. Repository: California State University, Northridge. Oviatt Library Map Collection, Northridge (CSUN), CA 91330 Abstract: The Flood Insurance Rate Map Collection contains a series of maps highlighting areas of potential flood risk throughout Los Angeles County. The maps were produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as part of the National Flood Insurance Program. Maps from the collection include both incorporated and unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, emphasizing areas of the County that contain creeks, channels, reservoirs, and other permanent or seasonal waterways. The bulk of the collection dates from the 1980s to the 1990s, with some maps from the 1970s and 2000s. Flood insurance maps also include municipal details like roads and highways. Language of Materials: English Processing Information: Processed by Thomas St. George, with assistance from Chris Salvano, during Spring 2017. Access The collection is available for research. Viewing hours may be limited. Please contact the repository for publication information. Publication Rights Please contact the repository for publication information. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], [date]. Los Angeles County Flood Insurance Rate Map Collection. Oviatt Library Map Collection, California State University, Northridge. Arrangement of Materials 1 Materials are arranged by municipality and by panel number. Scope & Content of Collection The Flood Insurance Rate Map Collection includes more than 300 maps collected and managed by the Oviatt Library Map Collection to support research within the Oviatt Library.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Drinking Water Quality Report
    2016 Drinking Water Quality Report For the period of January 1 through December 31, 2016 Table of Contents Water Quality in Los Angeles 2 Investing in Reliability, Water Quality and LA’s Water Future 3 Water Quality in the News 3 Where Does LA Get the Water It Needs? 5 Regulatory Compliance 6 Water Treatment Process 8 Water Quality at Home 9 Water Quality Service Areas in LA 10 2016 Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Results 11 General Information 18 Non-English Message 19 About the cover: LADWP crews lower a 54-inch valve into the trench as part of the Foothill Trunk Line project in the Sunland/Tujunga area of Los Angeles. Photographer: Art Mochizuki Photographer: Water Quality in Los Angeles n Los Angeles, having easy operational improvements. We tested for more than 200 Iaccess to safe, clean tap water regulated and unregulated contaminants and constituents is something that can be taken of interest such as sodium and hardness. for granted easily. More often As we move forward with our daily efforts, we seek than not, the water flows from innovative and proven technologies to improve our the tap without incident and operational effectiveness and delivery of safe water. you need not worry about it at In 2016, we employed new technology that changed the all. But recent headlines about conventional, and wasteful, flushing approach to cleaning failed water systems in Flint, distribution pipes by utilizing technology to achieve the A Message from MI and Corpus Christi, TX have Albert Gastelum same water quality improvement result without the water shed light on how valuable waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazards Mitigation Plan Update Is
    All Hazards Mitigation Plan CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 1 Santa Monica All Hazard Mitigation Plan 5/9/2014 All Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Santa Monica, CA UPDATED: 5/9/2014 Primary Point of Contact: Paul Weinberg Emergency Services Coordinator Santa Monica Office of Emergency Management 333 Olympic Drive, Santa Monica, CA 90401 310.458.8686 (Office) [email protected] 2 Santa Monica All Hazard Mitigation Plan 5/9/2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Section 1 – Mitigation Action Plan 1.1 Introduction 14 1.2 Community Profile 26 1.3 Risk Assessment 30 1.4 Mitigation Goals 34 1.5 Mitigation Action Items 36 1.6 Plan Maintenance 43 Section 2 – Hazards 2.1 Earthquake 49 2.2 Landslide 73 2.3 Flood 84 2.4 Tsunami 103 2.5 Wildfires 113 2.6 Severe Windstorm/Thunderstorm 126 2.7 Community Events 136 2.8 Exposition Light Rail 142 Section 3 – Resources Appendix A: Resource Directory 150 Appendix B: Public Participation Process 152 Appendix C: Economic Analysis of Natural Hazard Mitigation Projects 175 Appendix D: List of Acronyms 178 Appendix E: Glossary 179 3 Santa Monica All Hazard Mitigation Plan 5/9/2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Santa Monica All Hazard Mitigation Plan 5/9/2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On October 30, 2000, the President signed into law the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, also known as DMA2K. Among its other features, DMA2K established a requirement that in order to remain eligible for Federal disaster assistance and grant funds, local and State governments must develop and adopt Hazard Mitigation Plans (HMPs).
    [Show full text]
  • Scattergood Seawater Desalination Pilot Plant
    Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development Program Report No. 150 Scattergood Seawater Desalination Pilot Plant U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado October 2008 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1 . REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2 . REPORT TYPE 3 . DATES COV ERED (From - To) October 2008 Final June 2007 – June 2010 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Agreement No 5-FC-81-1158 Scattergood Seawater Desalination Pilot Project 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5 c. PROGRAM ELEM ENT NUM BER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5 d. PROJECT NUM BER Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 111 Hope St., Los Angeles, CA 90012 5e. TASK NUMBER Task G 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8 .
    [Show full text]