DOCSLIB.ORG

The Paradox of Self-Organisation Among Disadvantaged People: a Study of Marginal Citizenship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Paradox of Self-Organisation Among Disadvantaged People: a Study of Marginal Citizenship The Paradox of Self-Organisation among Disadvantaged People: A Study of Marginal Citizenship Rune Halvorsen Dr.polit. avhandling i sosiologi 2002 Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, NTNU Trondheim ISBN 82-471-5083-2 2 Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 7 Part I Introduction 1 The problem of marginal citizenship........................................................................... 11 Unexpected successes vis-à-vis the greater society................................................... 12 Self-organisation among the disadvantaged as a theoretical challenge..................... 17 Research objectives.................................................................................................... 20 2 Welfare-policy contexts of the attempts at self-organisation ...................................... 23 Steering problems and problems of democracy......................................................... 23 Citizenship, inclusion and exclusion ......................................................................... 26 Activation from above, participation from below ..................................................... 32 Multiculturalism......................................................................................................... 36 Norway as laboratory................................................................................................. 39 Concluding remarks................................................................................................... 47 3 Theoretical perspectives on mobilisation and marginality.......................................... 49 Perspectives on marginality as poverty ..................................................................... 50 Perspectives on marginality as deviance ................................................................... 57 Perspectives on marginality as disempowerment ...................................................... 63 Perspectives on social mobilisation: conflict groups................................................. 67 Perspectives on social mobilisation: resources, opportunities, frames...................... 71 Perspectives on social mobilisation: conversion of capital ....................................... 73 Summary and concluding remarks ............................................................................ 76 4 Design and methods in the data collection .................................................................. 83 Case-oriented approach.............................................................................................. 83 Bound generalisations in open systems ..................................................................... 88 Category comparison ................................................................................................. 93 Generative models ..................................................................................................... 96 Selection of cases....................................................................................................... 98 Core issues in the data collection............................................................................. 102 The data collection................................................................................................... 103 Further experiences from interviews and access ..................................................... 108 Presentation of the data............................................................................................ 110 Summary and concluding remarks .......................................................................... 112 3 Part II Between the organisational efforts 5 Framing of claims: The relationship between the organisational efforts .................. 117 Popular images and voices from “below”................................................................ 117 Self-presentation of claimants ................................................................................. 120 Self-presentation as an ethnic minority ................................................................... 123 Quests for particularity – being “special”................................................................ 125 Overlap in the recruitment basis .............................................................................. 126 Shifting alliances and constellations........................................................................ 127 Histories of Pride vs. Histories of Misery................................................................ 131 Acting as Survivors of the Mission.......................................................................... 134 Victim status as resource and cost ........................................................................... 138 Counter-discourse or independent symbol systems?............................................... 140 Concluding remarks................................................................................................. 142 Part III Inside the organisational efforts 6 Conflict and distrust as signs of vulnerability: The relations between the activists within the organisational efforts................................................................................... 145 Self-respect, stigmatisation and internal cohesion................................................... 145 Distrust turned inward ............................................................................................. 149 Denial of authority................................................................................................... 153 Lack of team presentation of self............................................................................. 158 Individual initiatives and avoidance of conflict....................................................... 163 Lasting and unsubstantial issues between the participants ...................................... 166 Concluding remarks................................................................................................. 168 7 Acting on ‘Otherness’: The relationship between the activists and other category members ....................................................................................................................... 171 Shame by association............................................................................................... 171 Stated goals of community ...................................................................................... 174 Detachment among claimants.................................................................................. 177 Recognition or ‘Othering’ of Travellers .................................................................. 181 Ambivalence about involving other category members in organisational activities186 Exhaustion and resignation (I)................................................................................. 186 Turning to outside supporters (II)............................................................................ 190 Combining group members and outside supporters (III)......................................... 191 Disappointment........................................................................................................ 192 Other peoples’ problems and misery ....................................................................... 193 Discussion: opportunities for agency?..................................................................... 195 Concluding remarks................................................................................................. 198 8 Between individual and collective claims: The organisation as action channel........ 201 Boundary drawing, connecting and fragmenting problem conditions..................... 202 Expectations and obligations placed on claimants .................................................. 205 Claimants’ perception and account of the welfare-state services............................ 210 Ritual goodwill and censoriousness on the part of claimants.................................. 213 4 Demands of uniqueness and expressiveness............................................................ 217 Problems of boundary drawing among claimants.................................................... 219 Travellers: United in demands for compensation and redress................................. 220 Discussion: expressiveness vs. predictability in interaction with the welfare state. 224 Concluding remarks................................................................................................. 227 9 The temporal dimension of the participants’ relationship to each other and the organisation .................................................................................................................. 229 The temporal dimension of status............................................................................ 230 Socially prescribed duration of the claimant status ................................................. 232 Duration of the status as perceived by claimants..................................................... 234 Actual duration of the claimant status ..................................................................... 236 Permanent temporality............................................................................................. 240 Justifications for breaking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master Thesis Cross Sectional Study Comparing the Quality of Life
    Master Thesis Cross sectional study comparing the Quality of Life, Academic stress, Ethnic identification and Alcohol use of Norwegian and international students and examining the relationship between these variables By Mohammad Owais Hadi Master of Applied Social Sciences (International Social Welfare and Health Policy) Faculty of Social Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, I acknowledge the blessings, mercy and grace of Allah who has helped me complete my thesis project as Allah has given me the courage and capability to conduct my survey and write this thesis with the best of my efforts. In addition to that, I would like to acknowledge the efforts of all those people who have helped me conduct my research and write this thesis. The most important amongst them was my supervisor Ashley Muller who guided me throughout my study from advising me to compare the quality of life of international and Norwegian students in a very ethical way to doing data analysis and correcting my thesis. Secondly, I thank all those Norwegian and international students who participated in my study by not only filling my questionnaire but also by promoting it to other students and the Norsk studentorganisajon who agreed to promote my survey to the best of their abilities. Thirdly, I thank the Norwegian data protection official Norwegian Centre for Research Data for providing me the ethical clearance to pursue data collection and Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research who provided me the questionnaire to measure the alcohol use of participants of my study. Finally, I am most thankful to my parents, sisters and friends whose wishes, prayers and support helped me complete this thesis project.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrine Holst, Gunnar C. Aakvaag (Eds.) Democratic State and Democratic Society
    Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrine Holst, Gunnar C. Aakvaag (Eds.) Democratic State and Democratic Society. Institutional Change in the Nordic Model Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrine Holst, Gunnar C. Aakvaag (Eds.) Democratic State and Democratic Society Institutional Change in the Nordic Model Managing Editor: Dominika Polkowska Language Editor: Adam Leverton ISBN 978-3-11-063407-5 e-ISBN 978-3-11-063408-2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2018 Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrine Holst, Gunnar C. Aakvaag Published by De Gruyter Poland Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Managing Editor: Dominika Polkowska Language Editor: Adam Leverton www.degruyter.com Cover illustration: egal / @thinkstock Contents Preface XIII Fredrik Engelstad, Cathrine Holst, Gunnar C. Aakvaag 1 Introduction: Democracy, Institutional Compatibility and Change 1 1.1 What Can a Democratic Society Be Like? 2 1.2 Alternative Views 3 1.3 Broadening Focus on Democracy 5 1.4 Institutions in Modern Societies 8 1.5 Institutions in Change 11 1.6 Aspects of the Nordic Model 13 1.7 A Brief Note on Methods 14 1.8 Challenges to Democracy in the Nordic Model 14 References 18 Fredrik Engelstad 2 Social Institutions and the Quality of Democracy 22 2.1 The Salience of Normative Theory 24 2.2 From Political Philosophy to Sociological Analysis 27 2.3 An Old Story: Democratizing the Economy 29 2.4 Normative Preconditions of the Modern Economy 30 2.5 Democratic Norms in the Economy 32 2.6 Welfare State Institutions in Democracy 33 2.7 Democracy in the Media Institution 37 2.8 Generalizing Institutional Norms and Conflicts 41 2.9 A Brief Conclusion 43 References 44 Gunnar C.
    [Show full text]
  • CAS 08.01 Impressions Nr.01-09 Eng Org.Indd
    CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDY SENTER FOR GRUNNFORSKNING IMPRESSIONS 1 | 2009 Content The utility value of basic research 1 Editorial by Willy Østreng The North Calotte was a world without borders 2 Interview, Professors Lars Forsberg and Lars-Gunnar Larsson Hands across the water 4 Interview, Professors Debora Amadori and Nina Witoszek Interdisciplinary continuity in the CAS administration 7 Interview, Professors Willy Østreng and Gro Steinsland Structural ignorance aggravates confl ict 10 Interview, Professors Graham Chapman and Nils Henrik Risebro The Norwegian School of Management BI is a new partner 13 CAS researcher wins prize 13 Facts about the Centre for Advanced Study (CAS) 14 Research groups 2008/2009 – Participants spring 2009 15 The CAS Board of Directors 16 The utility value of basic research The goal of basic research is to create new knowledge. It is curiosity-driven, time-consuming, experimental, theoretical, and has no explicitly expressed application. The physicist and science philosopher John Ziman put it this way: “Basic research is what you are doing when you don’t know what you are doing it for!” It aims at understanding phenomena and interrelationships no one has understood before. In basic research, the researcher is the fi rst mate, the skipper and the navigator. The spheres of study are theirs, and that must be respected. Basic research is independent. Bureaucrats, politicians and industrial magnates are best served by staying at arm’s length. Meanwhile, basic research is a high-risk activity, where the chances of winning or losing are equal. The road leads into the unknown, and there are no guarantees about the outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Social – Unlimited Faculty of Medicine (Pdf)
    Ski em al nfo rmasj on Skjema SFU Referanse 1006647 lnnsendt 1205.2013 17:25:15 Host information about host institution and center Name of centre Health and Social - Unlimited Host institution Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo P0 Box address 1078 BUndern Postal code I City/place 0316 OSLO Telephone 22845300 E-mail address [email protected] Contact person -Contact person Name Professor Kristin M. Heggen Title Vice dean for education Telephone work I mobile 22845376 99575450 E-mail address k. m. heggen®rnedisin. uio. no About the centre About the centre Is the centre already No established at the time of application Describe briefly the plans for establishing the centre (maximum 1500 characters) The consortium consists of the following institutions: Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo (UiO) (host institution); Faculty of Health and Faculty of Social Sciences at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science (HiOA); and the Faculty of Health, Care, and Nursing at University College at Gjøvik (GUC. The consortium brings together institutions that have demonstrated excellence in the areas of medical, health, and social education, along with their fields of practice. The consortium and its collaborating partners together cover the core issues in health and social education and practice. Based on the R&D plan, we aim to disseminate excellence and develop new educational and learning models in both education and work settings. The main aim is to create a bi-directional relationship between education and practice.We have selected the following problem areas in which educational innovation will be developed and spread in and outside the consortium: child care and welfare, care of persons with chronic lung disease, chronic musculoskeletal diseases, and elderly citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Portals and Internationalisation: a Survey of Norwegian Academic, Research and Special Libraries
    1 World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery" August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway Conference Programme: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla71/Programme.htm juli 13, 2005 Code Number: 158-E Meeting: 136a Quality Issues in Libraries DG Web portals and internationalisation: a survey of Norwegian Academic, Research and Special Libraries Maria-Carme Torras Senior Academic Librarian, University of Bergen Library Robert W. Vaagan Associate Professor, Faculty of Journalism, Library and Information Science, Oslo University College Abstract Norway currently has 362 academic, research and special libraries, most of which have developed web portals to provide a variety of online services to users, including part time and distance education users. While most web portals and most services are provided in Norwegian only, the globalisation forces of the information society are pushing institutions to provide an increasing range of services also in English. Based on an analysis of all 362 libraries and web portals, defined in a broad sense, including three illustrative case studies based on typical case sampling (Patton 2002), the article argues that an increasing amount of information will be made available in English on library web portals, but that the process will stop short of full bilingual provision. 1. Introduction 2. Research questions and methodology 3. Overview of Norwegian academic, research and special libraries and web portals 2 4. Range of web portal services in English 5. User education on the web portals: Bibliographic instruction and information literacy 6. The issue of web quality 7. Some typical cases a. Web portals in English only (3): Christian Michelsens Institute, Bergen b.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Systems and Their Effects on Higher Education Systems
    Funding Systems and Their Effects on Higher Education Systems NATIONAL STUDY – NORWAY November 2006 Nicoline Frølich NIFU STEP – Studies in Innovation, Research and Education Funding Systems and their Effects on Higher Education Systems – Norway Executive Summary In 2002 Norway introduced a new performance-based funding model for higher education in response to growth in the number of students and costs of higher education. The model aims to improve education as measured by the credits and graduates produced, increase research as measured by research publications, and enhance external relevance as measured by external funding. The model is still being developed. Formal explicit links between the fund- ing system and national higher education policies have been established as a result of a re- cent reform in Norwegian higher education (the Quality Reform). The various stakeholders have identified several intended and unintended effects of the funding system on higher education and on the core tasks of teaching and research. Accord- ing to the Ministry of Education and Research, the performance-based funding system will improve the quality of research and higher education, as these are best safeguarded by means of a funding system that emphasises results. The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions (the Rectors’ Conference) has identified several elements in the financing system that contribute to the development of HEIs. Incentives are viewed as a means of encouraging institutions to increase the quality of their educational programmes and research and to implement more structural changes. However, the Rectors’ Conference acknowledges that a funding model with financial rewards could produce unintended effects and advocates monitoring the consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociological Research in Norway
    Sociological research in Norway An evaluation Evaluation Division for Science Sociological research in Norway An evaluation Evaluation Division for Science © The Research Council of Norway 2010 The Research Council of Norway P.O.Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 OSLO Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 Telefax: +47 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.forskningsradet.no/english The report can be ordered at: www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner or green number telefax: +47 800 83 001 Design: Design et cetera AS Photo/illustration: Shutterstock Printing: Allkopi Number of copies: 500 Oslo, December 2010 ISBN 978-82-12-02842-5 (printed version) ISBN 978-82-12-02843-2 (pdf) Preface The panel for the evaluation of sociological research in Norway hereby submits the following report to the Research Council of Norway. The panel is unanimous in its assessments, conclusions and recommendations. Thirteen research units were included in the evaluation, comprising five university departments, two departments at university colleges and six institutes for applied research. Altogether, 177 researchers at these units were involved in the evaluation process. The panel wishes to thank the representatives of the 13 research units for their participation in the evaluation and for interesting discussions during the interview sessions. The panel also wishes to thank the researchers for their participation, as well as the Ph.D. students for sharing their views in meetings with the panel. Last but not least, the panel wishes to thank the Research Council of Norway for providing this opportunity for discussion and reflection about sociology in Norway and sociology as a discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Bomb Target Norway
    Bomb target Norway About Norwegian political history in a tragic background, the background to the Norwegian fascism. Militarism and na- tionalism are the prerequisites for fas- cism. By Holger Terpi Norway is a rich complex country with a small wealthy militarist and nationalist upper class, a relatively large middle class and a working class. The little known Norwegian militarism has always been problematic. It would censorship, war with Sweden, occupy half of Greenland1, was opponent of a Nordic defense cooperation, garden Norway into NATO2 and EEC, would have plutonium and nuclear weapons3, as well as, monitor and controlling political opponents, in- cluding the radical wing of the labor movement, pacifists and conscientious objectors. And they got it pretty much as they wanted it. One example is the emergency law or emergency laws, a common term for five laws adopted by the Storting in 1950, which introduced stricter measures for acts that are defined as treacherous in war, and also different measures in peacetime, such as censorship of letters, phone monitoring etc.4 1 Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Den. v. Nor.), 1933 P.C.I.J. (ser. A/B) No. 53 (Apr. 5) Publications of the Per- manent Court of International Justice Series A./B. No. 53; Collection of Judgments, Orders and Advisory Opinions A.W. Sijthoff’s Publishing Company, Leyden, 1933. 2 Lundestad , Geir: America, Scandinavia, and the Cold War 1945-1949. Oslo, University Press, 1980. - 434 pp. Paradoxically, according to Lundestad, the U.S. preferred socialist governments in Scandinavia rather than conservative, the reason was that they were perceived as "the strongest bulwark" against communism 3 Forland, Astrid: Norway’s nuclear odyssey: from optimistic proponent to nonproliferator.
    [Show full text]
  • Gigacampus 2006-2009 Final Report
    GigaCampus 2006-2009 Final Report Produced by UNINETT Author: Vidar Faltinsen March 2010 © Original version UNINETT 2010. © English translation TERENA 2010. All rights reserved. Parts of the report may be freely copied, unaltered, provided that the original source is acknowledged and copyright preserved. The translation of this report has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007- 2013) under grant agreement n°238875, relating to the project ‘Multi-Gigabit European Research and Education Network and Associated Services (GN3)’. Table of contents 1.Introduction 2 1.1 Organisation 2 1.2 Distribution of information 3 2. Vision, main objective and areas of involvement 3 3. Results and achievement of objectives 4 3.1 Raising the level of expertise through work groups and seminars 4 3.2 Joint recommendations (UFS documents) 5 3.3 Expedient purchasing co-operation 5 3.4 Investment support 5 3.5 Physical infrastructure 6 3.6 Campus networks 6 3.7 Mobility 6 3.8 Person-to-person communication 7 3.9 AV and multimedia 7 3.10 Security 7 3.11 Operational tools and quality assessments 8 4. Evaluation 9 4.1 Assessment of profitability 9 4.2 Feedback from universities and colleges 9 4.3 Experience 10 4.4 Enviromental benefits 10 5. The future 11 5.1 Campus activity will become a regular part of UNINETT’s business activities 11 5.2 European continuation through GEANT3 12 5.3 eCampus will carry on the good work 12 References 13 Attachments 14 A: GigaCampus information activities 14 B: GigaCampus seminars 15 C: GigaCampus work groups and UFS documents 17 D: Signed purchase agreements 19 E: Investment Support Projects 21 F: Availability of toolboxes and measurement beacons 23 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Know Norwaybook
    International and Comparative Studies in Education and Public Information Norway is a country of winter darkness and midnight sun, advanced technology, small towns and a few cities. It has a big The Know NORWAY Book government sector, free education and Background for Understanding the Country and Its People health services, and a modern and dynamic private sector. Pakistan and Afghanistan Edition Norway is home to large communities of Pakistani, Afghan and other immigrants and refugees. Norway is one of the world’s richest and most egalitarian societies. The country’s beauty has made tourism a major income-earner, and fishing, shipping and shipbuilding industries are still important. In the last generation, North Sea oil and gas production has made Norway one of the world’s largest oil exporters – and the Norwegians are now nicknamed “the blue-eyed sheikhs”. PRINTED IN PAKISTAN Mr.Books Atle Hetland Mr.Books Sang-e-Meel Sang-e-Meel The Know NORWAY Book Background for Understanding the Country and Its People Pakistan and Afghanistan Edition Atle Hetland Published in 2010 by Mr. Books Publishers and Booksellers, Islamabad, Pakistan www.mrbook.com.pk ISBN 969-516-166-9 This book, or part thereof, may not be reproduced in print or electronlic form without the permission from the author. Sections may, however, be reproduced for internal use by educational and research institutions and organizations, with reference given to the book. Copyright © Atle Hetland 2010 All rights reserved Author: Atle Hetland English Language and Editorial Consultant: Fiona Torrens-Spence Graphic Artist and Design: Salman Beenish Views expressed and analyses in this publication are those of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Norsk Romani-/Taterpolitikk Fortid, Nåtid, Fremtid
    Norsk romani-/taterpolitikk Fortid, nåtid, fremtid En menneskerettslig vurdering av hovedtrekk i norsk politikk i forhold til romanifolket/taterne. Den norske Helsingforskomité Tordenskioldsgt. 6 B 0166 Oslo Sammendrag og konklusjoner Den norske Helsingforskomité engasjerte seg i romanifolkets/taternes situasjon tidlig på 1990-tallet. Dette engasjementet var medvirkende til at det ble igangsatt forskning om romanifolkets historie og situasjon i Norge. Romanifolket/taterne var utsatt for en intens assimileringspolitikk fra norske myndigheters side fra andre halvdel av 1800-tallet og gjennom store deler av 1900-tallet. Tidlig på 1990-tallet stod for første gang personer fra romanifolket/taterne frem og ville ha dokumentasjon av hva denne politikken hadde ført med seg av overgrep. Initiativet ble først rettet mot Den norske Helsingforskomité og “la vekt på brudd på menneskerettigheter. Etter noen avklaringsrunder gjorde Sosial- og helsedepartementet det klart at det var innstilt på å bevilge midler til en undersøkelse av politikken overfor romanifolket, men at midlene skulle forvaltes av Norges forskningsråd.” 1 Forskningen konsentrerte seg om sterilisering, bortsetting av barn, erfaringer til personer av romani-/taterslekt som ble direkte berørt av sterilisering eller anbringelse på barnehjem og et prosjekt som “belyste den enkeltes opplevelser og erfaringer med å tilhøre romanifolket”. 2 Vi er derfor i den heldige situasjon at det finnes gode forskningsrapporter og bøker om viktige sider ved den norske assimileringspolitikken, selv om mange detaljer og lokale historier fortsatt er ubeskrevet. Og fortsatt mangler en menneskerettslig vurdering av overgrepene mot personer fra romanifolket/taterne. Særlig vil det være av verdi å utrede hvordan tiltak som hørte hjemme i den norske statens program for å håndtere “problemet med de reisende” må ses i lys av de menneskerettighetsforpliktelser Norge har påtatt seg i FN og Europarådet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bokutdrag – Lokalkontorer, Vedlegg2
    200 i strid for fred VEDLEGG 2 FREDSKONTORETS LOKALKONTORER PLASSERING OG MEDVIRKNING Oversikten over medarbeidere ved kontorene er langt fra fullstendig STED OG ADRESSE NOEN AV MEDARBEIDERNE STAVANGER Sonja Lid og Lars Andr. Larssen (ledere), Lars Gunnar Lingås (1967-68), Lagårdsveien 19, Torgunn Gripsrud, Bodil Bjørnstad, Svein Olav Larsen, Anne-Sofie Nag, 4000 Stavanger Håkon C. Pedersen, Valborg Tjora, Rakel Lapin, Abrahamsen, Torborg og Arnt Bækholt, Jacob Margido Esp, Arne Fjørtoft, Bente Gahnstrøm, Helge Fritzen. OSLO Sonja Lid og Lars Andr. Larssen (ledere), Monica Lagerborg, Arnhild Kihl, Kr. Augustsgate 19. Marit Bakke, Sverre Røed-Larsen, Bjørn Dag Gundersen, Marit Sørby, Oslo Maj-Lis Skrede, Torbjørn Helge, Anne Hjort-Larsen, Roger Bodin, Inger Foss, Arild Batzer, Fred Schønning Andreassen, Geir Johnsen, Ulf Nestvold, Kyriakos Chrysostomidis, Svein Hansen, Sidsel Mørch. FREDRIKSTAD Ivar Johansen, Jens Olav Simensen, Arne Josefsen, Magne Christiansen, Nygårdsgate 20, Leif Eriksen, Helge Jansson, Lisbeth Olsen, Kirsti Kristiansen, Sverre Fredheim, 1600 Fredrikstad Ole Gunnar Monsen. HAMAR Gunnar Olsen, Marianne Noodt. Ring gate 252, 2301 Hamar LILLEHAMMER Lars Gunnar Lingås (Våren 1967), Magne Bjørnerud, Thv. Ericsensvei 3, Ingar Johansen, Sidsel Mørck, Erik Hansveen. 2600 Lillehammer GJØVIK Bjørn Sivesind, Michael Hall, Ingvar Grastveit, Postboks 125, Knut Selsjord, Sverre Fredheim 2801 Gjøvik VESTFOLD/TØNSBERG/ SANDEFJORD: Inger Dag Steen, Vidar Ystad, Magnus og Unn Lund, SANDEFJORD Odd Kvanvik, Per Kvanvik, Ernst Evertsen, Torbjørn Berthling Hansen, Dronningensgate 9, Rolf Thoresen, Jan Erik Granlund, Helene Strand Johansen. 3200 Sandefjord GRENLAND/SKIEN Ragnar Olsen, Rolf Wergeland, Arild Batzer, Andreas Hompland, Postboks 345, Helge Fritzen, Ansgar Paulsen, Jardbjørg Krokan Stang, Arne Borgeraas, 3701 Skien Douglas Draper. ARENDAL Helga Lid Ball, Berit Moen, Harald Moen, Alfhild Pedersen, Arne Pedersen.
    [Show full text]