DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E: Natural, Cultural, and Scenic Resources Planning and Analysis Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TAB1 Appendix E TAB2 TAB3 Sue Copeland TAB4 TAB5 TAB6 Resources Planning and Analysis Reports Appendix E: Natural, Cultural, and Scenic Fremont Older Open Space Preserve Space Open Older Fremont TAB7 Appendix E-1: Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Vision Plan Prepared for: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, CA 94022 August 2013 Prepared by: Hannah Ballard, M.A. Elena Reese, M.A. Pacific Legacy, Incorporated 900 Modoc Street, Berkeley, CA 94707 Mark Hylkema, M.A., RPA Past Lifeways Archaeological Studies 225 Eureka Court, Sunnyvale, CA 94085 Appendix E: Natural, Cultural, and Scenic Resources Planning and Analysis Reports TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Goals of this Study .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Project Area ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Cultural Resource Team ....................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Regional Prehistoric and Historic Background ........................................................... 5 2.1 Native American Prehistory and History .................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Conceptualizing the Native American Cultural Landscape ....................................................... 5 2.1.2 Cultural Prehistory ...................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Outline of Tribal Lifeways at European Contact ................................................................. 19 2.2 Historical Overview ........................................................................................................... 34 2.2.1 Spanish Period (1776–1821) .......................................................................................... 34 2.2.2 Mexican Republic Period (1821–1848) .............................................................................. 37 2.2.3 American Period (1848–Present) .................................................................................... 40 3.0 Community Consultation .................................................................................. 49 4.0 Cultural Resources Overview ............................................................................. 51 4.1 Baseline Cultural Resources Inventory ..................................................................................... 51 4.1.1 Record and Information Search Methods ........................................................................... 51 4.1.2 Baseline Cultural Resources Inventory Results .................................................................... 51 5.0 Discussion ................................................................................................... 61 5.1 Cultural Resource Distribution within Environmental Zones ........................................................... 61 5.1.2 Prehistoric Resource Types and Distribution ...................................................................... 64 5.1.3 Historic Period Resource Types and Distribution ................................................................. 67 5.2 Representative Resource Analysis .......................................................................................... 70 5.2.1 Prehistoric Cultural Resources ....................................................................................... 71 5.2.2 Historic Period Resources ............................................................................................ 72 6.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 77 7.0 References Cited ........................................................................................... 78 Appendix E-1a: Community Consultation Documentation ................................................. 86 FIGURES Figure 1-1: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Lands. ................................................................. 3 Figure 1-2: Generalized Geographic Divisions within the MROSD District ..................................................... 4 Figure 2-1. Distribution of selected archaeological sites ...................................................................... 10 Figure 2-2: Distribution of Tribes at the time of European contact ......................................................... 23 Figure 2-3: Route of the Portola expedition of 1769 (North) ................................................................. 28 Figure 2-4: Route of the Portola expedition of 1769 (South) ................................................................. 29 Appendix E-1: Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report Appendix E: Natural, Cultural, and Scenic Resources Planning and Analysis Reports TABLES Table 2-1. Culture Chronology of the Southern San Francisco Bay Region .................................................... 7 Table 2-2. Key Game Species ...................................................................................................... 18 Table 2-3. Economically Significant Species ..................................................................................... 19 Table 2-4. Summary of Mexican Land Grants .................................................................................... 38 Table 3-1. Record of Native American Contact ................................................................................. 49 Table 4-1. Baseline Cultural Resources Inventory: Identified Cultural Resources within District OSPs ............... 53 Table 5-1. Summary of Distribution of Cultural Resources in the Environmental Zones .................................. 62 Table 5-2. Cultural Resource Land Use Categories ............................................................................. 65 Table 5-3. Summary of Distribution of Predicted Native American Cultural Attributes and Resource Types by OSP and Environmental Zones ................................................................................................... 66 Table 5-4. Best Examples of Historic Period Resources within District OSPs ............................................... 73 Appendix E-1: Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Report Appendix E: Natural, Cultural, and Scenic Resources Planning and Analysis Reports 1.0 INTRODUCTION of cultural resources are present both within and adjacent to District Lands and in archives containing 1.1 Introduction important data relevant to the District’s landholdings. The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Physical aspects of human prehistory and history are (District) is conducting a District wide vision manifest on landscapes in the form of past land planning process called Imagine the Future of Open management practices, archaeological sites, Space. Imagine the Future of Open Space will structures, features and artifacts that are collectively integrate technical scientific studies and public input referred to as “Cultural Resources.” Public to guide the District’s work for at least the next 15 to Resources Code 5024 requires that public 20 years. The District is a regional greenbelt system landholding agencies maintain an inventory of in the San Francisco Bay Area that includes San cultural resources and evaluate their potential Mateo, Santa Clara, and a small portion of Santa Cruz eligibility for listing on the National Register of counties. The District lands (herein District Lands) Historic Places (NRHP) or the California Register of consist of property owned by the District- including Historic Places (CRHR). Furthermore, such 26 Open Space Preserves (OSPs) and lands managed agencies, like MROSD must actively preserve and by the District but owned by Land Trust and private protect these resources from impacts resulting from landowners. The District includes 60,000 acres, project development, public access, looting or other which serves over 700,000 residents. Imagine the forces that would otherwise diminish the their Future of Open Space is focused on the District’s integrity. mission of preserving open space with a balanced Planning for stewardship of cultural resources in the approach to restoring the natural environment and District requires a grounded understanding of their increasing public access and education (Midpeninsula existing condition, their nature, and the associated Regional Open Space District 2013). historic contexts. To this end, this report details the Jodi McGraw Consulting contracted with Pacific research on cultural resources conducted for the Legacy and Mark Hylkema of Past Lifeways Vision Plan and forms the foundation for the Archaeological Studies (Past Lifeways) to conduct Stewardship Guide (Ballard and Hylkema 2013). The cultural resource investigations for Imagine the following report includes a discussion of the regional Future of Open Space. Pacific Legacy and Past prehistoric and historic background; community Lifeways were tasked with identifying known cultural consultation; a Baseline Cultural Resources Inventory resources within the Districts Lands (Figure 1-1), for the
Recommended publications
  • Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview

    Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview

    Introduction This volume is a general geology field guide to the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first section provides a brief overview of the San Andreas Fault in context to regional California geology, the Bay Area, and earthquake history with emphasis of the section of the fault that ruptured in the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. This first section also contains information useful for discussion and making field observations associated with fault- related landforms, landslides and mass-wasting features, and the plant ecology in the study region. The second section contains field trips and recommended hikes on public lands in the Santa Cruz Mountains, along the San Mateo Coast, and at Point Reyes National Seashore. These trips provide access to the San Andreas Fault and associated faults, and to significant rock exposures and landforms in the vicinity. Note that more stops are provided in each of the sections than might be possible to visit in a day. The extra material is intended to provide optional choices to visit in a region with a wealth of natural resources, and to support discussions and provide information about additional field exploration in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. An early version of the guidebook was used in conjunction with the Pacific SEPM 2004 Fall Field Trip. Selected references provide a more technical and exhaustive overview of the fault system and geology in this field area; for instance, see USGS Professional Paper 1550-E (Wells, 2004). San Andreas Fault: An Overview The catastrophe caused by the 1906 earthquake in the San Francisco region started the study of earthquakes and California geology in earnest.
  • Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report

    Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report

    Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report Mark Seelos November 28, 2018 Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 2 General Background 3 3 Regulatory Background 4 4 Purpose 4 5 Survey Methodology 5 6 Results 6 6.1 Respondent Demographics . .6 6.2 Fish Consumption . .7 6.3 Awareness . .8 6.4 Health Risk . .9 7 Discussion 10 7.1 Respondent Demographics . 10 7.2 Fish Consumption . 12 7.3 Advisory Awareness . 12 7.4 Health Risk . 12 8 Recommendations 13 9 Acknowledgments 14 10 Figures 15 List of Figures 1 Water Bodies Included in Survey . .6 2 Surveys Conducted at Each Water Body . 15 3 Ethnicities of Anglers Interviewed . 16 4 Ages of Anglers Interviewed . 16 5 Counties of Residence of Anglers Interviewed . 17 6 Median Incomes of Angler Zip Codes . 17 7 Reservoir and Plan for Catch . 17 8 Ethnicity and Plan for Catch . 18 9 Age and Plan for Catch . 18 10 Consumption by Median Income of Zip Code . 19 11 Information Sources where Anglers Learned of Advisories . 19 12 Awareness of Health Advisories by Ethnicity . 20 13 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Ethnicity . 20 14 Awareness of Health Advisories by Age . 21 15 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Age . 21 16 Health Advisory Awareness by Income . 22 17 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Income . 22 1 18 Sign Density and Fish Consumption . 23 19 Anglers who Feed Catch to High-Risk Groups . 23 20 Local vs. Commercial Fish Consumption of Anglers who have Ever Eaten Catch . 24 21 Monthly Consumption of locally caught Fish by Anglers who have Ever Eaten Catch 24 22 Percentage of Times Fished vs.
  • Selections from the Henry J. Kaiser Pictorial Collection

    Selections from the Henry J. Kaiser Pictorial Collection

    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf958012j8 Online items available Henry J. Kaiser Pictorial Collection, bulk 1930-1960 Selections (1983.017-.019, and 1983.027) described and processed for digitization by California Heritage Staff, 1996-1997. Descriptions of other series added in 2020 by Bancroft Library staff, from pre-existing contents lists. The Bancroft Library 1997 and 2021 The Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/libraries/bancroft-library Henry J. Kaiser Pictorial BANC PIC 1983.001-.075 1 Collection, bulk 1930-1960 Contributing Institution: The Bancroft Library Title: Henry J. Kaiser pictorial collection Creator: Kaiser, Henry J., 1882- Creator: Henry J. Kaiser Company Creator: Kaiser Industries Corporation Creator: Kaiser Motors Corporation Creator: Kaiser Steel Corporation Creator: Kaiser Shipyards (Richmond, Calif.) Creator: Kaiser-Frazer Corp. Identifier/Call Number: BANC PIC 1983.001-.075 Physical Description: 200000 photographs (approximately 200,000 items (photographic prints, negatives, and albums), some design drawings and plans, and 909 digital objects) Date (bulk): bulk 1930-1976 Abstract: The Henry J. Kaiser Pictorial Collection contains an estimated 200,000 items, chiefly photographs, documenting the activities, projects, and products of the various companies that comprised Kaiser Industries, as well as photographs of Kaiser family members and associates. Subjects pictured include the Hoover, Parker, Bonneville, Grand Coulee, and Shasta Dams; the Kaiser shipyards in Richmond, California, including its products, workers and workers' housing conditions; Kaiser-Frazer automobiles, Kaiser Willys, Kaiser Steel, Kaiser Hospitals, and other Kaiser corporations in the San Francisco Bay Area and Hawaii, with some international content as well.
  • Mnn Sept 2020

    Mnn Sept 2020

    Paula Leary · 408.425.3345 [email protected] · Lic. #01469235 Terry Leary · 408.921.4343 Erik Jacobsen (Lic. [email protected]. 01231234) · Lic. #01854782 Office: (650) 847-1141 Golden Gate Sotheby's International Realty [email protected] LearyProperties.com www.goldengatesir.com Median Sales Price 95033 Santa Clara County Santa Cruz County $1.4M MEDIAN PRICES 2017–2020 ZIPCODE 95033 $1.3M SANTA CLARA $1.2M COUNTY $1.1M $1.0M $0.9M SANTA CRUZ COUNTY $0.8M $0.7M 1-20172017 1-20182018 1-20192019 1-20202020 95033 & Santa Clara County & Santa Cruz County Each data point is rolling six months of activity. Data is from August 7, 2020. All data from MLSListings,All data from Inc.MLSListings, Data deemed Inc. Data reliable, deemed but reliable, not guaranteed. but not guaranteed. Provided by Each Golden data Gatepoint Sotheby'sis rolling six International months of activity. Realty. DataInfoSparks is from ©August 2020 7,ShowingTime. 2020. SOLD IN 9 DAYS SOLD IN 10 DAYS SOLD IN 11 DAYS OVER ASKING 24455 Loma Prieta Avenue, Los Gatos 24179 Summit Woods 24960 Skyland Ridge 24145 Summit Woods Built in 2013 · 4 Bedrooms · 4.5 Bathrooms Drive, Los Gatos Road, Los Gatos Drive, Los Gatos Home ±4,300 sf · Lot ±9 acres $1,335,000 $1,765,000 $1,430,000 663 Blossom Hill Road Suite 200, Los Gatos · GoldenGateSIR.com · Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated. Get a head start to Access thousands of new listings before anyone else, finding your home. only at compass.com. Aptos Scotts Valley Scotts 600 Lassen Park Court Benjamin Guilardi Elvie
  • Background the Whirley Crane and Shipyard Number 3

    Background the Whirley Crane and Shipyard Number 3

    Background The Whirley Crane and Shipyard Number 3 The “Whirley Crane,” so-called because its turret is capable of rotating 360 degrees, was built by Clyde Iron Works of Duluth, Minnesota in 1935. It was first used to build Grand Coulee Dam in Washington state, the second phase of which was done by a consortium of companies led by industrialist Henry J. Kaiser. In 1941, the crane was shipped by barge down the Columbia River and down the coast to Todd California Shipbuilding in Richmond, which later became Shipyard No 1 of Kaiser’s Richmond shipbuilding enterprise. In this location, it and dozens of others like it dominated the skyline of Richmond’s southern waterfront. Crane Facts: Weight: 229,000 pounds Boom length: 110 feet Diameter of turntable assembly: 28 feet Lifting capacity: 166,000 Original cost: $32,000 The use of Whirley Cranes was a major innovation in the mass production of ships. The cranes made it possible to turn huge ship structural pieces around and over during the pre-assembly process so that novice welders could complete relatively simple welding seams parallel to the ground. The cranes were also used in groups – as many as four cranes working together -- to move large pre-assembled parts of a ship into place in the basins so the ship could be fitted together, generally by welding. The result was a previously unimagined rate of production. A total of 747 ships were produced in the Kaiser shipyards in Richmond from 1942-1945. After the war, this crane was acquired by Parr-Richmond Terminal, which later became Levin-Richmond Terminal Corporation.
  • Designing a User Interface for the Innovative E-Mail Client Semester Thesis

    Designing a User Interface for the Innovative E-Mail Client Semester Thesis

    Designing a User Interface for the Innovative E-mail Client Semester Thesis Student: Alexandra Burns Supervising Professor: Prof. Bertrand Meyer Supervising Assistants: Stephanie Balzer, Joseph N. Ruskiewicz December 2005 - April 2006 1 Abstract Email Clients have become a crucial application, both in business and for per- sonal use. The term information overload refers to the time consuming issue of keeping up with large amounts of incoming and stored email. Users face this problem on a daily basis and therefore benefit from an email client that allows them to efficiently search, display and store their email. The goal of this thesis is to build a graphical user interface for the innovative email client developed in a previous master thesis. It also explores the possibilities of designing a user interface outside of the business rules that apply for commercial solutions. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Existing Work 6 2.1 ReMail ................................. 6 2.1.1 Methods ............................ 6 2.1.2 Problems Identified ...................... 7 2.1.3 Proposed Solutions ...................... 7 2.1.4 Assessment .......................... 8 2.2 Inner Circle .............................. 8 2.2.1 Methods ............................ 8 2.2.2 Problems Identified ...................... 9 2.2.3 Proposed Solutions ...................... 9 2.2.4 Assessment .......................... 10 2.3 TaskMaster .............................. 10 2.3.1 Methods ............................ 10 2.3.2 Problems Identified ...................... 11 2.3.3 Proposed Solution ...................... 11 2.3.4 Assessment .......................... 12 2.4 Email Overload ............................ 12 2.4.1 Methods ............................ 12 2.4.2 Problems Identified ...................... 13 2.4.3 Proposed Solutions ...................... 13 2.4.4 Assessment .......................... 14 3 Existing Solutions 16 3.1 Existing Email Clients .......................
  • Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory

    Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory

    Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory 1150 North First Street, Suite 100 San Jose, California 95112 Phone (408) 983-0100 www.dsj.org updated 10/8/2020 1 2 Table of Contents Diocese Page 5 Chancery Office Page 15 Deaneries Page 29 Churches Page 43 Schools Page 163 Clergy & Religious Page 169 Organizations Page 205 Appendix 1 Page A-1 Appendix 2 Page A-15 3 4 Pope Francis Bishop of Rome Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina's capital city, on December 17, 1936. He studied and received a master's degree in chemistry at the University of Buenos Aires, but later decided to become a Jesuit priest and studied at the Jesuit seminary of Villa Devoto. He studied liberal arts in Santiago, Chile, and in 1960 earned a degree in philosophy from the Catholic University of Buenos Aires. Between 1964 and 1965 he was a teacher of literature and psychology at Inmaculada High School in the province of Santa Fe, and in 1966 he taught the same courses at the prestigious Colegio del Salvador in Buenos Aires. In 1967, he returned to his theological studies and was ordained a priest on December 13, 1969. After his perpetual profession as a Jesuit in 1973, he became master of novices at the Seminary of Villa Barilari in San Miguel. Later that same year, he was elected superior of the Jesuit province of Argentina and Uruguay. In 1980, he returned to San Miguel as a teacher at the Jesuit school, a job rarely taken by a former provincial superior.
  • Restoration Monitoring Final

    Restoration Monitoring Final

    SCIENCE FOR SOLUTIONS NOAA COASTAL OCEAN PROGRAM Decision Analysis Series No. 23, Volume 1 SCIENCE-BASED RESTORATION MONITORING OF COASTAL HABITATS Volume One: A Framework for Monitoring Plans Under the Estuaries and Clean Waters Act of 2000 (Public Law 160-457) Gordon W. Thayer Amy D. Nickens Teresa A. McTigue Stephen J. Lozano Russell J. Bellmer Perry F. Gayaldo Felicity M. Burrows Pamela J. Polmateer David H. Merkey P. Thomas Pinit OCTOBER 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE NATIONAL CENTERS FOR COASTAL OCEAN SCIENCE CENTER FOR SPONSORED COASTAL OCEAN RESEARCH DECISION ANALYSIS SERIES The Decision Analysis Series has been established by NOAA’s Coastal Ocean Program (COP) to present documents that contain analytical treatments of major issues or topics for coastal resource decision makers. The issues, topics, and principal investigators have been selected through an extensive peer review process. To learn more about the COP or the Decision Analysis Series, please write: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program (N/SCI2) Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research 1305 East West Highway, Room 8243 Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282 phone: 301-713-3338 fax: 301-713-4044 web: www.cop.noaa.gov Cover photo. A coastal wetland complex on the Lake Ontario shoreline. Photo courtesy of Doug Wilcox, United States Geological Survey. Science for Solutions NOAA COASTAL OCEAN PROGRAM Decision Analysis Series No. 23, Volume 1 SCIENCE-BASED RESTORATION MONITORING OF COASTAL HABITATS Volume One: A Framework for Monitoring Plans Under the Estuaries and Clean Waters Act of 2000 (Public Law 160-457) Gordon W. Thayer Teresa A.
  • Siliqua Patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida the Flat Razor Clam Family: Pharidae

    Siliqua Patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida the Flat Razor Clam Family: Pharidae

    Phylum: Mollusca Siliqua patula Class: Bivalvia; Heterodonta Order: Veneroida The flat razor clam Family: Pharidae Taxonomy: The familial designation of this (see Plate 397G, Coan and Valentich-Scott species has changed frequently over time. 2007). Previously in the Solenidae, current intertidal Body: (see Plate 29 Ricketts and Calvin guides include S. patula in the Pharidae (e.g., 1952; Fig 259 Kozloff 1993). Coan and Valentich-Scott 2007). The superfamily Solenacea includes infaunal soft Color: bottom dwelling bivalves and contains the two Interior: (see Fig 5, Pohlo 1963). families: Solenidae and Pharidae (= Exterior: Cultellidae, von Cosel 1993) (Remacha- Byssus: Trivino and Anadon 2006). In 1788, Dixon Gills: described S. patula from specimens collected Shell: The shell in S. patula is thin and with in Alaska (see Range) and Conrad described sharp (i.e., razor-like) edges and a thin profile the same species, under the name Solen (Fig. 4). Thin, long, fragile shell (Ricketts and nuttallii from specimens collected in the Calvin 1952), with gapes at both ends Columbia River in 1838 (Weymouth et al. (Haderlie and Abbott 1980). Shell smooth 1926). These names were later inside and out (Dixon 1789), elongate, rather synonymized, thus known synonyms for cylindrical and the length is about 2.5 times Siliqua patula include Solen nuttallii, the width. Solecurtus nuttallii. Occasionally, researchers Interior: Prominent internal vertical also indicate a subspecific epithet (e.g., rib extending from beak to margin (Haderlie Siliqua siliqua patula) or variations (e.g., and Abbott 1980). Siliqua patula var. nuttallii, based on rib Exterior: Both valves are similar and morphology, see Possible gape at both ends.
  • USGS Professional Paper 1740

    USGS Professional Paper 1740

    Age, Stratigraphy, and Correlations of the Late Neogene Purisima Formation, Central California Coast Ranges By Charles L. Powell II1, John A. Barron1, Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki1, Joseph C. Clark2, Frank A. Perry3, Earl E. Brabb4, and Robert J. Fleck1 Abstract Counties inland to the San Andreas Fault (fig. 1). These scat- tered outcrops have been grouped as the Purisima Formation The Purisima Formation is an important upper Miocene because they are all fine- to coarse-grained clastic rocks, with and Pliocene stratigraphic unit in central California, cropping dark andesitic fragments and locally abundant silicic tephra, out from the coast at Point Reyes north of San Francisco to and occupy the same stratigraphic position at their various more extensive exposures in the Santa Cruz Mountains to the exposures. Since first described by Haehl and Arnold (1904), south. The fine-grained rocks in the lower parts of the Puri- the Purisima Formation has been considered to be of Pliocene sima Formation record a latest Miocene transgressive event, or of late Miocene to Pliocene age. Differing age assignments whereas the middle and upper parts of the formation consist have resulted from the wide stratigraphic range of many com- of increasingly clastic-rich siltstones and sandstones resulting monly encountered megafossils and from the lack of agree- from uplift of adjacent coastal regions and the Sierra Nevada ment on the placement of the Miocene-Pliocene Series bound- during Pliocene transgressive and regressive sea-level events. ary between the provincial megafaunal chronology and that Exposures of the Purisima occur in three different, fault- of international usage.
  • National Register of Historic Places I ] §Gp Registration Form I

    National Register of Historic Places I ] §Gp Registration Form I

    (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places I ] §gp Registration Form i • _ _„_....—•- This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. ?See instructions in Hovy to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete eaihJtem by marking"x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicaole." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property________________________________________RELt^Fn/r''!^ historic name Alviso, Jose Maria, Adob°—————————————— other names/site number CA-SC1 -15? ___________________ 2. Location street & number Q? P-jprfmnnt- Pnari ___________________________ G not for publication city or town Mi Ip-it-ac;_____________________________________ D vicinity state ______rj=n -ifn-rnia code CA county fianivi ria-ra_____ code ngc; zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this^Q nomination Q request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property S3 meetdlO does not meet the National Register criteria 1 recommend that this property be considered significant d nationally £H stat§wid^ Q/tocally.
  • Guidelines on Electronic Mail Security

    Guidelines on Electronic Mail Security

    Special Publication 800-45 Version 2 Guidelines on Electronic Mail Security Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Miles Tracy Wayne Jansen Karen Scarfone Jason Butterfield NIST Special Publication 800-45 Guidelines on Electronic Mail Security Version 2 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Miles Tracy, Wayne Jansen, Karen Scarfone, and Jason Butterfield C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 February 2007 U .S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Robert C. Cresanti, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security, and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-45 Version 2 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-45 Version 2, 139 pages (Feb.