DOCSLIB.ORG

The Greatest Invention

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Greatest Invention ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ American ★ ★ Dream ★ ★ Coalition ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ The Greatest Invention How Automobiles Made America Great by Randal O’Toole American Dream Coalition September 2006 The Greatest Invention: How Automobiles Made America Great by Randal O’Toole American Dream Coalition Post Office Box 1590 Bandon, Oregon 97411 americandreamcoalition.org September 2006 Abstract The automobile has been widely criticized for its so- wildlife and watersheds, and another 40 million acres cial costs, including accidents, pollution, and changes of pasture to the production of higher-valued crops. to urban form. But few of the critics consider the many In comparison, the 21 million or so acres of low-den- benefits that the auto has produced for the average sity suburban development that has taken place since American. This paper fills that gap, showing that the 1945 is relatively insignificant. automobile has played a large or dominant role in: Because of these benefits, it is reasonable to call • Increasing personal incomes by seven times; the mass-produced automobile the greatest inven- • Increasing personal mobility by six to eight tion in the 230 years since the American republic was times; founded. Those who seek to reduce the amount of • Increasing homeownership rates by nearly 50 driving people do by imposing disincentives to the percent; auto or allowing traffic congestion to increase risk • Reducing the cost of consumer goods and in- killing, or at least limiting, the automotive goose that creasing the variety of such goods by up to 100 laid the golden egg of American prosperity. times or more; This paper recommends that governments should • Enabling the civil rights and women’s liberation be neutral regarding people’s transportation choices, movements; only insuring that people pay the full costs of their • Making outdoor sports and numerous other rec- choices. Transportation agencies should be led by reational and social opportunities available to the transportation professionals, not political appointees, average person; and funded as much as possible out of user fees such • Providing rapid access to fire and other emergency as gasoline taxes, tolls, and transit fares. Subsidies services and swift escape from natural disasters. needed for purposes of social equity should be given to Automobiles, trucks, and tractors also allowed a transportation users, not transportation bureaucracies. significant improvement in land uses in this coun- These policy guidelines will insure that government try. Since they replaced horses for most farming and programs produce transportation systems that are safe hauling uses, farmers converted 80 million acres of and efficient, allowing the nation to continue enjoying horsepasture to forests, which are far superior for the benefits of the greatest invention in its history. Contents Introduction . .5 Mobility . .6 Incomes . .8 Freight Transport Costs . .11 Consumer Costs . 12 Consumer Goods . 13 Social & Recreational Benefi ts . 16 Health and Safety . 17 Freedom . 18 Land Use . .19 SOVs and SUVs . 20 Recommendations . .22 References . .24 Tables and Figures Figure One—Personal Mobility in the Twentieth Century . .6 Figure Two—Transit and Highway Subsidies and Use, 1987–2004 . .7 Figure Three—Income Per Worker and Per Capita . .8 Figure Four—Transportation Costs . 12 Figure Five—Personal Costs . 12 Table One—Consumer Costs as a Share of Personal Income . .12 Table Two—Homes and Businesses on University Avenue . .14 Cover Photos 1. 1938 Buick “Y-job,” the fi rst concept car and in- spiration for many post-war auto designs. 1 2 3 2. Ad for 1950 Ford. 3. 1929 Packard. 4. 1954 Dodge FireArrow concept car. 4 5 5. 1955 Chevrolet Nomad. 6. Ad for 1939 Ford “woody” station wagon. 6 7. Biodiesel-powered Ford pickup truck. 7 8 8. 1940 Chrysler Thunderbolt concept car. 9. 1956 Chevrolet and matching Glastron boat. 10. Postage stamp depicting 1954 Kaiser Darrin. 9 10 Uncredited anonymous photos are in the public domain or have GNU Free Documentation Licenses. 4 S D Q W F G Z H G C The Greatest Invention Executive Summary In 1900, the United States was a rich and grow- • In 1900, many women and most blacks were ing nation, yet many of the benefits of that wealth trapped in oppressive social systems. The au- were accessible to just a few. Only the wealthy, and tomobile offered escape, enabling the civil some whose jobs depended on travel, frequented rights and womens liberation movements; passenger trains, dined regularly in restaurants, • In 1900, the average grocery store stocked or regularly wore fine clothes. fewer than 300 items on its shelves. Today, For many urban dwellers, life was harsh: living the variety of foods and other consumer in high-density tenements, walking to factory goods has increased by 100 times or more— jobs that demanded long hours and offered low and quality has increased as well; pay. Life in rural areas was, in many ways, even • In 1900, only upper-class families could af- worse. While a larger share of families owned ford to take an annual vacation—most em- their own homes, they were rarely able to leave ployees worked six days a week, fifty-two their farms. Life for women in particular was weeks a year. The automobile (and the mov- especially lonely. ing assembly line that made mass production The mass-produced automobile changed possible) reduced the work week and made everything. The moving assembly lines that Henry annual vacations the norm; Ford developed to build his Model Ts increased • In 1900 outdoor sports such as skiing, back- worker incomes and made mobility affordable to packing, and river running were either acces- the average family. The use of trucks for ship- sible only to the very wealthy or did not exist ping, especially when aided by intermodal con- at all. Today millions of people engage in in- tainers, greatly reduced consumer costs. numerable outdoor sports each year, many of Some of the benefits that are largely or entirely which are only accessible by auto. due to the automobile include: Railroads, bicycles, streetcars, and subways • In 1900, the average American traveled less have all played a role in American transportation. than 3,000 miles per year, mainly on foot, But no other form of transportation has pro- and many lived and died without ever jour- duced such huge benefits at such a low cost as the neying more than fifty miles from home. automobile. Despite these benefits, some people Today the average American travels close to argue that we should rely less on autos and more 20,000 miles per year, mostly in automobiles, on other forms of transport. They support gov- and thinks nothing of taking trips of several ernment policies, funding, and rules promoting hundred miles; alternatives to the auto and hindering driving. • In 1900, homeownership was affordable only It is wrong to imagine that America can limit to the wealthy, rural landowners, and white- automobility without reducing incomes and collar workers. The automobile made home- the other benefits automobiles have produced. ownership affordable to working-class fami- Regions that try to discourage auto driving or lies and led to a nearly 50-percent increase in that divert highway user fees to expensive transit homeownership rates; schemes are only hurting their residents, espe- • In 1900, food and shelter alone consumed cially low-income families for whom the auto- more than half of an average family’s per- mobile offers an escape from poverty. The nation sonal income. Today the average family eats should instead recognize that the automobile is much better and lives in a much nicer home, the greatest invention in its history and create yet food and shelter consume only a quar- systems giving people the freedom to choose how ter of its income, leaving more for recreation, they travel while insuring that they pay the full education, and other things; costs of their transport choices. How Automobiles Made America Great d q s z f h c g 5 Introduction In the 230 years since the republic was founded, no in- or a twenty-year-old Yugo. The egalitarian benefits vention has enhanced the quality of life of the average of autos extends to other aspects of American life as American as much as the mass-produced automobile. well: While homeownership in the first half of the Neither railroads, nor electricity, nor telephones, nor twentieth century was limited to white-collar work- computers, nor the Internet have led to as many im- ers, farmers, and the wealthy, the second half saw its provements in personal mobility, income, homeown- extension to blue-collar workers. ership, consumer goods, recreation and social oppor- Despite these huge benefits, for forty years crit- tunities, or other aspects of our personal lives. ics of the automobile have waged a continuing drum Since the auto was invented, personal mechanized beat against autos and highways. Such critics point to travel has increased by at least sixteen times. This the high social costs of driving, such as air pollution increase in mobility is largely responsible for a seven- and auto fatalities. Yet, besides ignoring the benefits fold increase in inflation-adjusted worker incomes of driving, the critics also ignore the huge decline in and a 50-percent increase in homeownership rates. these social costs over the past several decades. Thanks in large part to trucks, freight transport costs • Fatality rates have declined from an average of 50 have declined by 90 percent. This cost reduction, per billion vehicle miles in the 1960s to just 15 in combined with the automobility of consumers, has the 2000s.1 increased the variety of consumer goods by roughly • Pedestrian fatality rates have declined from more one hundred times. than 12 per billion vehicle miles in 1956 to just While the share of personal incomes spent on 1.6 in 2004.2 transportation has only slightly increased since 1929 • Though we drive nearly three times as many (and has declined since 1950), thanks in large part miles as we did forty years ago, total emissions to automobility the shares Americans spend on food, of major pollutants (carbon monoxide, nitrogen clothing, housing, and household goods have dramat- oxides, hydrocarbons, and particulates) have de- ically declined.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impacts of Technological Invention on Economic Growth – a Review of the Literature Andrew Reamer1 February 28, 2014
    THE GEORGE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY The Impacts of Technological Invention on Economic Growth – A Review of the Literature Andrew Reamer1 February 28, 2014 I. Introduction In their recently published book, The Second Machine Age, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee rely on economist Paul Krugman to explain the connection between invention and growth: Paul Krugman speaks for many, if not most, economists when he says, “Productivity isn’t everything, but in the long run it’s almost everything.” Why? Because, he explains, “A country’s ability to improve its standard of living over time depends almost entirely on its ability to raise its output per worker”—in other words, the number of hours of labor it takes to produce everything, from automobiles to zippers, that we produce. Most countries don’t have extensive mineral wealth or oil reserves, and thus can’t get rich by exporting them. So the only viable way for societies to become wealthier—to improve the standard of living available to its people—is for their companies and workers to keep getting more output from the same number of inputs, in other words more goods and services from the same number of people. Innovation is how this productivity growth happens.2 For decades, economists and economic historians have sought to improve their understanding of the role of technological invention in economic growth. As in many fields of inventive endeavor, their efforts required time to develop and mature. In the last five years, these efforts have reached a point where they are generating robust, substantive, and intellectually interesting findings, to the benefit of those interested in promoting growth-enhancing invention in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DEMOPOLIS Democracy Before Liberalism in Theory and Practice
    Trim: 228mm 152mm Top: 11.774mm Gutter: 18.98mm × CUUK3282-FM CUUK3282/Ober ISBN: 978 1 316 51036 0 April 18, 2017 12:53 DEMOPOLIS Democracy before Liberalism in Theory and Practice JOSIAH OBER Stanford University, California v Trim: 228mm 152mm Top: 11.774mm Gutter: 18.98mm × CUUK3282-FM CUUK3282/Ober ISBN: 978 1 316 51036 0 April 18, 2017 12:53 Contents List of Figures page xi List of Tables xii Preface: Democracy before Liberalism xiii Acknowledgments xvii Note on the Text xix 1 Basic Democracy 1 1.1 Political Theory 1 1.2 Why before Liberalism? 5 1.3 Normative Theory, Positive Theory, History 11 1.4 Sketch of the Argument 14 2 The Meaning of Democracy in Classical Athens 18 2.1 Athenian Political History 19 2.2 Original Greek Defnition 22 2.3 Mature Greek Defnition 29 3 Founding Demopolis 34 3.1 Founders and the Ends of the State 36 3.2 Authority and Citizenship 44 3.3 Participation 48 3.4 Legislation 50 3.5 Entrenchment 52 3.6 Exit, Entrance, Assent 54 3.7 Naming the Regime 57 4 Legitimacy and Civic Education 59 4.1 Material Goods and Democratic Goods 60 4.2 Limited-Access States 63 4.3 Hobbes’s Challenge 64 4.4 Civic Education 71 ix Trim: 228mm 152mm Top: 11.774mm Gutter: 18.98mm × CUUK3282-FM CUUK3282/Ober ISBN: 978 1 316 51036 0 April 18, 2017 12:53 x Contents 5 Human Capacities and Civic Participation 77 5.1 Sociability 79 5.2 Rationality 83 5.3 Communication 87 5.4 Exercise of Capacities as a Democratic Good 88 5.5 Free Exercise and Participatory Citizenship 93 5.6 From Capacities to Security and Prosperity 98 6 Civic Dignity
    [Show full text]
  • Inventions and Patents
    MODULE 03 Inventions and Patents MODULE 03. Inventions and Patents OUTLINE LEARNING POINT 1: Basics of invention and patent 1. One way of adding value to a product 2. Reasons for patenting an invention LEARNING POINT 2: Patent application 1. Evaluating the patentability of an invention 2. Deciding whether to patent an invention 3. Preparing a patent application (1) Detailed description of the invention (2) Claims (3) Who prepares (4) After filing a patent application LEARNING POINT 3: Patent infringement 1. Definition of patent infringement 2. If you come across your competitor’s patent LEARNING POINT 4: Patent management system 1. Basic elements of a patent management system 2. Patent portfolio INTRODUCTION The term "intellectual property (IP)" is defined as the property resulting from creations of the human mind, the intellect. In this regard, it is fair that the person making efforts for an intellectual creation has some benefit as a result of this endeavor. Probably, the most important among intellectual properties is “patent.” A patent is an exclusive right granted by a government for an invention, which is a product or a process that provides, in general, a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical solution to a problem. The details on the way of acquiring patents will be provided for protecting precious intellectual properties. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. You understand how to decide whether your new technology or invention should be protected by one or more patents and, if so, how to do so. 2. You know how the grant of a patent over an invention or technology helps you to prevent or have an upper hand in legal disputes that may arise later on.
    [Show full text]
  • The New World of Discovery, Invention, and Innovation: Convergence of Knowledge, Technology, and Society
    J Nanopart Res (2013) 15:1946 DOI 10.1007/s11051-013-1946-1 PERSPECTIVES The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society Mihail C. Roco • William S. Bainbridge Received: 13 August 2013 / Accepted: 14 August 2013 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2013 Abstract Convergence of knowledge and technol- research, development, and applications based on ogy for the benefit of society (CKTS) is the core dynamic system-logic deduction, (3) enhancement of opportunity for progress in the twenty-first century. creativity and innovation through evolutionary pro- CKTS is defined as the escalating and transformative cesses of convergence that combines existing princi- interactions among seemingly different disciplines, ples and divergence that generates new ones, (4) the technologies, communities, and domains of human utility of higher-level cross-domain languages to activity to achieve mutual compatibility, synergism, generate new solutions and support transfer of new and integration, and through this process to create knowledge, and (5) the value of vision-inspired basic added value and branch out to meet shared goals. research embodied in grand challenges. CKTS is a Convergence has been progressing by stages over the general purpose approach in knowledge society. It past several decades, beginning with nanotechnology allows society to answer questions and resolve prob- for the material world, followed by convergence of lems that isolated capabilities cannot, as well as to nanotechnology, biotechnology, information, and create new competencies, knowledge, and technolo- cognitive science (NBIC) for emerging technologies. gies on this basis. Possible solutions are outlined for CKTS is the third level of convergence.
    [Show full text]
  • L D SANTOS Polanyi Through the Lens of Epistemologies from The
    2nd EMES-Polanyi International Seminar Societies in transition: Social and solidarity economy, the commons, public action and livelihood CNAM, Paris (France) · 19 - 20 May 2016 Title: Polanyi through the lens of Epistemologies of the South and Postcolonial Feminist Economics: different glances at the concept of disembeddedness 1 Author: Luciane Lucas dos Santos - senior researcher at the Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra (Alice Project: Strange Mirrors, Unexpected Lessons). Visiting Scholar at the Federal University of Southern Bahia (Brazil). 1. Introduction This paper debates the concept of disembeddeness in the context of the feminisms of the South. Departing from a feminist rereading of Polanyi’s work, proposed by Waller and Jennings (1991), I intend to discuss the Polanyian concept of disembeddedness within market societies, by interacting with the points of disagreement they presented regarding the limits of Polanyi’s criticism on formalist economics. Given Polanyi was described as being epistemologically complacent with the formalist model to describe capitalist economies and that they argued the formalist perspective has deepened the abyss between family and economy domains, I discuss to what extent modern gender meanings related to this split still remain in case of non-western perspectives of gender. Waller and Jennings have argued that the formalist analysis reinforces the invisibility of non market social arrangements, equally indispensable to provide an accurate picture of the provisioning dynamics which caracterizes, first and foremost, the actual economies. Despite all the promising convergence between Polanyi’s theoretical perspective and a feminist reinterpretation of Economics, Polanyi is assumed as having emphasised the inadequacy of formalist analysis for understanding non market societies and doing so underestimated the relevance of non market social arrangements within market societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery, Invention, and Development: Human Creative Thinking* HERBERT A
    Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 80, pp. 4569-4571, July 1983 Psychology Discovery, invention, and development: Human creative thinking* HERBERT A. SIMON Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 Contributed by Herbert A. Simon, August 24, 1982 The subject of this paper is a singularly appropriate one for this and application. In particular, the development of products from journal. We are all experts on the topic of scientific discovery, basic discoveries takes place in a complex social and economic invention, and development. Members are elected to the Na- environment, in which both motivations and definitions of the tional Academy of Sciences because they have been adjudged problem differ very much from those in the environments where to have done some creative thinking that led to one or more basic discoveries typically occur. On the other side, I am going significant discoveries, inventions, or applications of scientific to emphasize the communalities of process-and to argue, in ideas. fact, that while discovery and development usually address dif- But the fact that a person sometimes does creative things does ferent substantive problems, the psychological processes of not mean that he understands the creative process. To imagine problem solution are quite similar. that a scientist can give a full scientific account of his own thought Let me begin by defining creativity in a pragmatic way. From processes is no more reasonable than putting a Geiger counter time to time, human beings arrive at ideas that are judged by on the podium at an American Physical Society meeting and their fellows to be both novel and valuable.
    [Show full text]
  • Joan Didion and the American Dream Joel Alden Schlosser [email protected]
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Political Science Faculty Research and Scholarship Political Science 2018 Joan Didion and the American Dream Joel Alden Schlosser [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/polisci_pubs Part of the Political Science Commons Custom Citation Schlosser, Joel. 2018. "Joan Didion and the American Dream." Raritan 37.4: 28-51. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/polisci_pubs/38 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Joan Didion and the American Dream JOEL ALDEN SCHLOSSER “Dreamers,” declares Ta-Nehisi Coates in Between the World and Me, believe the lie of the American dream, deifying democracy to avoid the human costs it has entailed. “Historians conjured the Dream,” Coates writes. “Hollywood fortified the Dream. The Dream was gilded by novels and adventure stories.” As Jedediah Purdy writes, dreamers are “blinkered people who imagine America an easy and untroubled home. .Dreamers decorate their history with bunting and streamers.” For Coates, these dreamers do not just exhibit bad faith; the disavowal of their complicity in structures of terror against black bodies effectively supports these structures, continuing the lega- cies of racism in the United States. Dreamers implicitly support a poli- tics of racial exclusion and unjustifiable violence. “It is the innocence,” as James Baldwin declared, “that constitutes the crime.” Coates’s recent invocation of the American dream as a destruc- tive and evasive fantasy has a strange affinity with a writer who rarely touched the “race beat”: Joan Didion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basics of an Intellectual Property Program
    Intellectual Property The Basics of an Intellectual Property Program In today’s resource-constrained and highly competitive environment, companies and senior executives have a keen interest in maximizing the value of their intellectual property, much of which is generated by their employees’ daily activities. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Intellectual Property creators, or owners, of patents, trade secrets, trademarks One way to help build a or copyrighted works to benefit from their work or valuable intellectual property investment in a creation: (IP) portfolio is to establish an • A patent provides exclusive rights for an invention—a product or process that provides a new way of IP Program. Properly designed, doing something. A patented invention cannot be commercially made, used, distributed or sold without an IP Program can help identify, the patent owner’s consent. As with other property rights, patent owners may also sell or license their protect and optimize the value patent rights to someone else. Once a patent expires, protection ends and the invention is then available for of a company’s key assets. commercial exploitation by others. • A trade secret is information not generally known or ascertainable by the public that the owner takes Any company developing intellectual property—which reasonable efforts to keep secret in order to derive could include rights over products, services, technology, economic value from such secrecy. Such information business practices and creative content—should can include a formula, pattern, compilation, program, implement fundamental IP protections, such as device, method, technique or process. ensuring that staff members and consultants have signed confidentiality and assignment of invention agreements, • A trademark is a distinctive word (or words), logo, sign and educating employees (especially those in sales, or even a smell that identifies certain goods or services marketing, engineering and legal) about the basics of trade produced or provided by an individual or a company.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE RATE AND DIRECTION OF INVENTION IN THE BRITISH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: INCENTIVES AND INSTITUTIONS Ralf Meisenzahl Joel Mokyr Working Paper 16993 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16993 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 April 2011 Prepared for the 50th anniversary conference in honor of The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, ed. Scott Stern and Joshua Lerner. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Kauffman Foundation and the superb research assistance of Alexandru Rus. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2011 by Ralf Meisenzahl and Joel Mokyr. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Rate and Direction of Invention in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and Institutions Ralf Meisenzahl and Joel Mokyr NBER Working Paper No. 16993 April 2011 JEL No. N13,N73,O31,O34,O43 ABSTRACT During the Industrial Revolution technological progress and innovation became the main drivers of economic growth. But why was Britain the technological leader? We argue that one hitherto little recognized British advantage was the supply of highly skilled, mechanically able craftsmen who were able to adapt, implement, improve, and tweak new technologies and who provided the micro inventions necessary to make macro inventions highly productive and remunerative.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation X and the Invention of a Third Feminist Wave
    GENERATION X AND THE INVENTION OF A THIRD FEMINIST WAVE by ELIZABETH ANN BLY Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Renée Sentilles Department of History CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2010 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of _____________________________________________________ candidate for the ______________________degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Copyright © 2009 by Elizabeth Ann Bly All rights reserved iii For Gabe, Kristin, and Xoe And in memory of Judith Northwood (1964-2009) iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix ABSTRACT xiii INTRODUCTION 1 White Grrrls 7 ―We Don‘t Need Another Wave‖ 11 Generation X, Feminism, and Contemporary History 19 ―The Order of Things‖ 25 CHAPTER ONE: “Generation X and the 1970s Pop Cultural Discourse on „Women‟s Lib‟” 32 ―Women‘s Lib‖: The Media‘s ―Charred Bra‖ Revolution 35 A Day in the Life: ―Women‘s Lib‖ as Spectacle 38 ―And Then There‘s Maude‖: ―Women‘s Lib‖ and Adult TV 46 Women‘s Lib
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism and Its Critics. a Long-Term View
    German Historical Institute London THE 2017 ANNUAL LECTURE Capitalism and Its Critics A Long-Term View by Jürgen Kocka The Concept The concept ‘capitalism’ is much younger than the historical reality it denotes. While ‘capital’ and ‘capitalist’ are older, the noun ‘capitalism’ did not emerge until the second half of the nineteenth century. The French socialist Louis Blanc used it in 1850, and defined it critically as ‘appropriation of capital by some, to the exclusion of others’. In 1872, the German socialist Wilhelm Liebknecht railed against capitalism as a ‘juggernaut on the battlefields of industry’. And in Britain, the Fabian John A. Hobson, a critic of imperialism, was one of the first to use the concept in the 1890s. However, it was not General Editor: Christina von Hodenberg Editor: Jane Rafferty long before ‘capitalism’ moved beyond its initially critical and polemical use, becoming a central concept in the London: 2018 social sciences. German authors such as Albert Schäffle, Werner Sombart, Max Weber, and – in a Marxist Published by The German Historical Institute London tradition – Rudolf Hilferding, contributed much to this. 17 Bloomsbury Square Karl Marx had written a great deal about the ‘capitalist London WC1A 2NJ mode of production’ and ‘capitalist accumulation’, Tel: 020 7309 2050 Fax: 020 7404 5573/7309 2055 email: [email protected] homepage: www.ghil.ac.uk but he rarely used the noun ‘capitalism’, and if so, somewhat marginally. 1 ISSN 0269-8560 This lecture is based on Jürgen Kocka, Capitalism. A Short History Printed and bound by Page Bros., Norwich (Princeton/NJ, 2016). An extended version of the text appeared in Karin Hofmeester (ed.), The Lifework of a Labor Historian.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FLASH of GENIUS DOCTRINE Approaches the Patent Office by WILLIAM DOUGLAS SELLERS*
    THE FLASH OF GENIUS DOCTRINE Approaches the Patent Office By WILLIAM DOUGLAS SELLERS* NGINEERS and scientists are rather closely associated with its high sponsorship. So long as it remained a fiction E inventions and patents. It seems appropriate that the views on Mt. Olympus it was not intolerable. That it would of William D. Sellers should be presented to the readers of Engineering and Science. In many cases the interest in patents filter down to lesser courts was recognized as probable of highly trained technical men is not paramount to but incidental hut the hope remained that it would be modified, re- to and the result of their work in their particular field. As a matter stricted, or abandoned before the danger went too far. of fact, the trained engineer or scientist probably is not as prolific Proposed legislation to effect the removal of this un- in the procurement of patents as those who have not had as much welcome and unnecessary growth has been and is being formal training. Charles F. Kettering of General Motors has written a very inter- discussed. The case here referred to makes it clear that esting article on "How Can We Develop Inventors" which appeared the need for early action is urgent. in "Mechanical Engineering," April, 1944. His remark about en- In the case Potts et a1 v. Coe appellant Potts brought gineers in the field of invention is worth quoting. a 4915 action in the District Court seeking the grant of "Some years ago a survey was made in which it was shown that if a person had an engineering or scientifte education, the prob- a patent covering an automatic stock quotation board.
    [Show full text]