DOCSLIB.ORG

Mifepristone), Also Known As RU-486

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mifepristone), Also Known As RU-486 ~(J10;.01-27 f4~1 Rep. Corte- )512)463-0646 » Attorney General P 1/2 TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES RECEIVED -. DISTRICT ADDRESS JAN 28 2010 2(140 llAHCOCK RD .• SUITE 40:> I P.o. BOX 291(1 SA!'; ANTONIO. TI( 7sm . AliSTIN. 1'X 7P6~·2910 OPINION ::'12-4Cl.l-0646 210-34'>-0320 TOLL FREE: }I~J(_4(13Jlt.46 FAX: 21(l.349-<)lBI January 27,2010 FRANK J. CORTE JR. The Honorable Greg Abbott Attorney General . \ \' ~ \D State of Texas r;!lE~~\.;.~ ......\).t>J~\)- . - P.O. Box 12548 .~... ~ :2 0. Austin, Texas 78711-254g_D. 11- .... ~ , Re: Supplemental request to RQ-0829-GA ~~-~~~~.. ~~ Dear General Abbott: In RQ-0829-GA (October 5, 2009), I asked whether a license is needed for a facility to perfonn mooical abortiolJS. 1 would ask that, in answering that question, you would also address a closely -related issue, to wit, whether drugs that are administered for the pUIpOse ofinducing an abortion must be ingested by the patient hi the presence of the physiCian who has prescribed them for .her. Based on infonnation that has been brought to my attention, it appearS that at Jesst some abortion proViders who offer medical-abortions allow the prescribed abortifi¥lients to be given (dispensed) to the patient outside the presence of the physician who prescribed them -instead of in the - presenCe of the physician. Based upon the statutes, regulations and protocols applicable to medical abortions, as set forth in detail in my request for an opinion (see pp_ 3-5 and supporting; materials), this practice would apPear to be unlawful and unaUthotized:. In addition to the authorities cited in my original letter, I would briefly mention the following. The Occupations Code provides", in relevant part: General Authority of Physician to Delegate. (a) A physician may delegate to a qualified and properly trained person acting under the physician's supervision any medical act that a reasonable and prudent physician would find within the scope of sound medical judgment to delegate if, in the opinion of the delegating physician: (I) the act: (A) can be properly and safely performed by the person to whom. the medical act is delegated; (8) is performed in its cust0e:tIH er; and . ;;! ~ \" , &; . DISTRlcr 122 . ("OMMI'I"n;!;S: CI-IAIR-DIlFIlNSE AJo'f'AIRS AND STA'T!;.fIlDERAL RELATIONS· ENERGY RF,SOURCES • REDISTRI('·TING 'J;; 'uiA 11 • -A-..nt,. -N'Wt#ll"IMliU1U' el'sl ..... f'X' 1111:: PAGE 112 t ~ AT 112712010 2:19:59 PM (CtII1raJ standard TIme) t SVR:R1GHTFAX18 t DNIS:3990 t CSID:Rep. Collet DURATION (mnrss):OO;SS 2010-01-27 14:22 Rep. Corte )512)463-0646 »AttorneyGeneral P 2/2 (C) is not in violation qr any other statute; ... OCCUPATIONS CODE § 157.001(a)(1) (emphasis added). Section 245.010(b) of the Health & .. Safety Code provides that "only a physician as defined by Subtitle B, Title 3, Occupations Code, may perform an abortion." HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 245.01 O(b). Accordingly, under the Occupations Code, as limited by the Health & Safety Code, a physician may not delegate the performance of an abortion to another health care professional. Drugs prescribed for the purposed of inducing ,an abortion must be administered and ingested in the presence of the physician who prescribed them. They may not be administered outside the' presence of a physician, nor may they be ingested offsite instead of at the facility where they were dispensed. Sincerely, PAGE 212' RCVD AT 112712010 2:19:59 PM [CentraI standard Time]! SVR:R1GHTFAXl8* DNlS:3990 I CSID:Rep. Corte I DURATION (mm-ss):00-58 , TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT ADDRESS: AUSTIN ADDRESS: RECEIVED 1'-0. BOX 2910 2040 BABCOCK RD, SUITE 402 AUSTIN. TX 78768·2910 SAN ANTONIO. TX 78229 512463-0646 OCT 092009 210-34900320 TOLL FREE: 888463.()646 M . FAX: 210-349-0381 FAX: 51246J.0893 OPINION COM ITTEE' . FRANK J. CORTE JR. October 5, 2009 FILE #MI- 4&;/95-0'1 I.D. '# Lf(p I 9 S"' The Honorable Greg Abbott Attorney General State of Texas P.O. Box 12548 . Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Dear General Abbott: As Chainnan of the House eoInnIittee on Defense & Veterans' Affairs, I am requesting an Opinion from your office on the following question: Is a license needed for a facility to perfunn medical abortions? Under the Texas Abortion Facility Reporting and Licensing Act, TEx.lIEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 245.001 et seq., no person may establish or operate an abortion facility.in Texas without being 1 licensed by the Texas Department of Health. The Act defines "abortion facility" as "a place , . where abortions are perfonned.,,2 "Abortion," in turn, is defined as: an act or procedure perfonned after pregnancy has been medically verified and with the intent to cause the termination of a pregnancy other than for the purpose of either the birth of a live fetus or removing a dead fetus. The term does not include birth control devices or oral contraceptives.3 Only licensed physicians may perfonn abortions.4 Recently, the Texas Department of State Health Services was asked whether a license is needed .' for a facility to perform medical abortions. Currently, the only drug authorized by the FDA for I TEx. HEALTH&SAFE1YCODE § 245.003. 2 It!. § 245.002(2» 31d. § 245.002(1) 41d. § 245.01O(b) DiSTRICT 122 COMMl'ITEES: CHAIR-DEFENSE AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS' NATURAL RESOURCES E-MAIL: [email protected] Name October 5, 2009 Page 2 the express purpose of causing an abortion is Mifeprex (mifepristone), also known as RU-486. (Another FDA approved drug, methotrexate, a cancer treatment drug, is not labeled as an abortifacient, but it has been lawfully administered for that purpose for several years as an "off­ label" use.) In a response to this question, Marc Allen Connelly, Deputy General Couosel for the Texas Department of State Health Services, stated as follows: . As per statute, abortion is defined as an act or procedure perfonned with the intent to terminate the pregnancy. If a pregnant woman is given RU-486 at a facility and she ingests it at the facility and subsequently aborts the fetus at the facility, an abortion facility license is required. If, however, she is prescribed RU-486 or the pill is handed to her, and she leaves the facility, ingests the pill elsewhere, and aborts the fetus elsewhere, no abortion has occurred at the facility aod no license is required. Mr. Connelly then cited the statutory definitions of "abortion" and "abortion facility," TEx. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §§ 245.002(1), (2), as well as the general licensing requirement, §245.003. See Appendix I for a copy of Mr. Connelly's communication. Mr. Connelly does not explain whether a license is required if the pregnant woman ingests RU-486 at the facility and subsequently aborts elsewhere, which is howthe drug is typically administered and how it usually works. His communication appears to suggest that if a pregnant woman is given RU-486 at a facility, ingests it there, but aborts the fetus elsewhere, no abortion has occurred at the facility and no license is required. A proper analysis of the applicable statutes and regulations indicates that the administration of . RU-486 (or the administration of methotrexate for the same purpose) constitutes an "abortion" within the meaning of § 245.002(1), without regard to the location where the woman ingests the drug or where she subsequently aborts. Analysis The starting point for analysis is the language of the statute. An "abortion facility" .is defined as "a place where abortions are performed"s. "Abortion," in tum, is defined in relevant part as "an act or procedure perfonned after pregnancy has been medically verified and with the intent to cause the termination of a fregnancy other than fur the purpose of either the birth of a live fetus or removing a dead fetus" . Thus, whether a facility should be considered an "abortion facility" depends on whether "abortions" are performed at the facility. SId. § 245.002(2) 61d. § 245.002(1) Name October 5, 2009 Page 3 Contrary to the implication of Mr. Connelly's communication, "abortion" is not defined in tenns of where the pregnancy is tenninated but, rather, where "an act or procedure" is performed ''with the intent to cause the termination of a pregnancy ..." (emphasis added). Two examples involving surgical abortions make this clear. Example one: assume that a physician begins a procedure that is intended to temrinate a pregnancy (e.g., a D&E procedure) but, because of an unforeseen complication (excessive bleeding), the patient must be transferred to a hospital where another physician completes the abortion. The physician who began the procedure has performed an "abortion" within the meaning of § 245.002(1). Example two: assume that a physician begins an induction abortion at one facility, by inserting laminaria into the pregnant woman's cervix, then completes the procedure by delivering the fetus at a hospital or an ambulatory surgical center two or three days later. He has performed an "abortion" within the meaning of § 245.002(1) at the first facility. Just as a procedure perfurmed "with the intent to cause the termination of a pregnancy" is an "abortion" without regard to where the abortion is completed, so too is an act (administering a drug to a patient) performed with the same intention (causing "the termination of a pregnancy") regardless of where the abortion is completed. In fact, the Texas Administrative Code, in its regulations govemingmedical abortions, refers to ''the abortionprocedure,,7 (emphasis added). A careful examination of the applicable provisions of the Abortion Facility Reporting and Licensing Act leads to but one conclusion: administering a drug to a pregnant patient with the intention of causing the tennination of her pregnancy is an "abortion" without regard to where the patient takes the drug or where she ultimately aborts her unborn child.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Experiencing Abortion: a Phenomenological Investigation
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-1998 Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation Kathryn Rea Smith University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Kathryn Rea, "Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1998. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2514 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathryn Rea Smith entitled "Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education. Mark Hector, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Howard Pollio, Patricia Droppleman, Sandra Thomas Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council : I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathryn Rea Smith entitled "Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation." I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 How Sociologists View Social Problems: the Abortion Dilemma
    How Sociologists View Social Problems: 1 The Abortion Dilemma Listen to Chapter 1 on MySocLab Learning Objectives. After reading this chapter, you should be able to: 1.1 Understand the sociological imagination 1.5 Describe the contributions that sociologist can (sociological perspective), explain the difference make in studying social problems. (p. 15) between a personal and a social problem, and 1.6 Explain why common sense is not adequate to explain the significance of social location. (p. 2) understand social problems. (p. 17) 1.2 Understand that sociologists can use social 1.7 Understand the four basic research designs and location to predict group behavior but not research methods that sociologists use to study individual behavior. (p. 4) social problems. (p. 17) 1.3 Explain why a social problem consists of both 1.8 Summarize the disagreement in sociology regard- objective conditions and subjective concerns ing whether or not sociologists should choose and why social problems are relative. (p. 5) sides. (p. 21) 1.4 Identify the four stages through which social problems evolve. (p. 7) 1 M01_HENS5120_11_SE_C01.indd 1 5/23/13 7:15 AM 1.1 isa felt desperate. The argument with her you think it is, a puppy?” Lgrandmother seemed to have gone on for- “You’re being ridiculous! You’re trying to ever, and they both were now at their wits’ end. judge my life by your standards. You never “You don’t know what you’re doing, Lisa. wanted a career. All you ever wanted was to You’re taking the life of an innocent baby!” her raise a family.” grandmother said once again.
    [Show full text]
  • Prologue: My Own Introduction to Rhetorical Strategies………………………………6
    Without Conscience: A Critique of Pharmacist Refusal Clause Rhetoric Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Silleck, Jennette Lynn Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 13:53:26 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/193267 1 WITHOUT CONSCIENCE: A CRITIQUE OF PHARMACIST REFUSAL CLAUSE RHETORIC by Jennette Silleck _____________________ Copyright © Jennette Silleck 2008 A Document Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN’S STUDIES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2008 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This document has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this document are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: __Jennette Lynn Silleck_____________________ APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: _____________________________________________ 4-14-08_____ Adam Geary Date Assistant Professor of Women’s Studies 3 Acknowledgements I would first and foremost like to thank my thesis committee Adam Geary, Laura Briggs, and Jennifer Nye.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Paper Number 5 May 1, 2009
    IORG International Organizations Research Group Briefing Paper Number 5 May 1, 2009 REMOVING THE ROADBLOCKS FROM ACHIEVING MDG 5 BY IMPROVING THE DATA ON MATERNAL MORTALITY: How Faulty Definitions of “Abortion,” “Safe Abortion,” and “Unsafe Abortion” in Reproductive Health Indicators for Global Monitoring Lead to Miscalculating the Causes of Maternal Mortality by Donna J. Harrison, M.D. IORG BRIEFING PAPER REMOVING THE ROADBLOCKS FROM ACHIEVING MDG 5 BY IMPROVING THE DATA ON MATERNAL MORTALITY: How Faulty Definitions of “Abortion,” “Safe Abortion,” and “Unsafe Abortion” in Reproductive Health Indicators for Global Monitoring Lead to Miscalculating the Causes of Maternal Mortality by Donna J. Harrison, M.D. Donna J. Har- By establishing Millennium Development Goal 5 (MDG 5), world leaders agreed that rison, M.D. is a reducing maternal mortality was essential to fulfilling their “collective responsibility Diplomat for the to uphold the principles of human dignity, equality and equity at the global level.”1 American Board The goal aims at improving maternal health by reducing by three quarters the mater- of Obstetrics and nal mortality ratio between 1990 and 2015. Now at the halfway point, the world lags Gynecology and President of the far behind in achieving the goal, with questionable prospects for success. This paper American Asso- demonstrates one important reason why. ciation of Pro Life Obstetricians and Experts have emphasized the need to take into account the dangers of abortion to Gynecologists. women’s life and health. Yet surprisingly
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Contraceptives Or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women to Make Informed Decisions Ryan M
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 71 | Issue 2 Article 23 Spring 3-1-2014 Emergency Contraceptives or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women to Make Informed Decisions Ryan M. Hrobak Washington and Lee University School of Law Robin Fretwell Wilson University of Illinois College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation Ryan M. Hrobak and Robin Fretwell Wilson, Emergency Contraceptives or "Abortion-Inducing" Drugs? Empowering Women to Make Informed Decisions, 71 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1385 (2014), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol71/iss2/23 This Session 5 is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Emergency Contraceptives or “Abortion-Inducing” Drugs? Empowering Women to Make Informed Decisions Ryan M. Hrobak* Robin Fretwell Wilson** Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................... 1386 II. A Resurgent Abortion Debate ....................................... 1391 III. Factual Basis for Religious Concerns............................ 1397 A. Contraceptives or Abortifacients?: Unraveling Science and Semantics ............................................ 1398 1. How Plan B Works ............................................. 1400 2. How Ella May Work .......................................... 1402 B. The Meaning of Life—Or at Least Pregnancy ........ 1405 IV. Women Care About Mechanisms of Action ................... 1409 V. The Duty of Informed Consent ...................................... 1413 A. Two Approaches to Informed Consent ...................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Mexico City Policy by the United States of America
    Mervi Patosalmi Political science / Women’s Studies Program Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy University of Jyväskylä Finland Foreign policy controlling choices, minds and bodies: the case of the Mexico City Policy by the United States of America 2 Table of contents Introduction _____________________________________________________________ 3 I The Mexico City Policy described___________________________________________ 5 1 Background: From Roe v. Wade to the Mexico City Policy ________________________ 5 2 The Mexico City Policy according to official documents _________________________ 14 II The Mexico City Policy re-described ______________________________________ 23 1 Introduction: aspects of control______________________________________________ 23 2 Women’s bodies as object of family planning __________________________________ 28 3 Bio-politics of the populations in the US population policies ______________________ 41 4 Controlling women’s bodies and imaginations _________________________________ 52 III American foreign policy of women’s bodies ________________________________ 59 References _____________________________________________________________ 65 3 Introduction The subject of this study is the Mexico City Policy, which is a United States foreign policy covering certain aspects of foreign aid. The policy was originally introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. President Bill Clinton rescinded it, but it was reinstate by President George W. Bush in 2001. The policy denies giving federal development funding for non-governmental
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Context of Abortion Law in Early Modern England
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 14 (2007-2008) Issue 1 William & Mary Journal of Women and Article 4 the Law October 2007 To "Bring Down the Flowers": The Cultural Context of Abortion Law in Early Modern England Carla Spivack Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Family Law Commons Repository Citation Carla Spivack, To "Bring Down the Flowers": The Cultural Context of Abortion Law in Early Modern England, 14 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 107 (2007), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ wmjowl/vol14/iss1/4 Copyright c 2007 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl TO "BRING DOWN THE FLOWERS":' THE CULTURAL CONTEXT OF ABORTION LAW IN EARLY MODERN ENGLAND CARLA SPIVACK* ABSTRACT This article takes issue with claims made by Joseph Dellapenna in his 2006 book, Dispelling the Myths of Abortion History, which claims to correct the "distortions of the history" of abortion law under- lying Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Dellapenna argues that, con- trary to Justice Blackmun's historic analysis in Roe, "abortion was considered a serious crime throughout most of European history" and that "courts did... punish abortions before quickening during the Middle Ages." This article shows that Dellapenna's argument relies on serious misreading of cases and ignorance of the relevant his- torical, medical, and cultural context, and that pre-quickening or intra-marital self-induced abortion was of little concern to the law.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Health Organization's Abortion Agenda
    InternatIonal organIzatIons research group • WhIte paper • number eleven The World Health Organization’s Abortion Agenda By Andrew M. Essig, Ph.D. A Program of Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute InternatIonal organIzatIons research group • WhIte paper • number eleven The World Health Organization’s Abortion Agenda By Andrew M. Essig, Ph.D. A Program of Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute © 2010 Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute 866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 495 New York, New York 10017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .................................................................. v Introduction ............................................................ 1 Part I: Overstepping its Mandate or Wrong Mandate? .................... 5 Part II: Abortion ....................................................... 17 • Flawed Nature of WHO Data ....................................... 20 • Experimenting with Abortion on the World’s Women ............... 22 • Radical Roots of WHO Abortion Activism .......................... 24 • Pressuring Governments to Change Abortion Laws .................. 25 • Arbitrarily Redefining “Pregnancy” ................................. 26 • Funding WHO’s Abortion Agenda .................................. 27 Part III: Family Planning as Human Rights Activism .................... 33 • Fighting Religion and Tradition to Promote Family Planning ........ 35 • Pitfalls of the Rights-based Approach ............................... 38 Implications, Policy Recommendations, and Conclusions ............... 45 List
    [Show full text]
  • Female Sexual and Reproductive Health Beyond Foetal Right to Life
    Female Sexual and Reproductive Health Beyond Foetal Right to Life A Comparative Analysis of Gender Equality in Mexican Criminal Law with Relation to Abortion Written by Selma Geovanna Tello Garcia Malmö University Department of Global Political Studies Human Rights III, 15 Credits Spring Semester 2020 Supervisor: Kamal Makili-Aliyev Abstract The aim of this study has been to analyse the ways Mexican states articulates the actions of women undergoing abortion and the effects it has on criminal sanctions specified for women. This study analyses the criminal code of Mexico City which decriminalised abortion in 2007, the criminal code of Jalisco reformed in 2009 and the criminal code of Yucatán reformed in 2009. The discrimination of women had been the major concern of International Human Rights Law as well of feminist jurisprudence. This research has attempt to problematise and highlight different aspects of discrimination taking place in Mexican law. Feminist liberal theory and radical feminism had been placed to analyse the criminal codes governing Mexican abortion law. Thus, in this thesis the problems of women to access legal abortion had been discussed as a problem of discrimination based on sex. Therefore, this study does not touch upon tensions between the foetus and the mother but the conflict that emerge in the ways the law thinks of women. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Research Problem 2 1.2. Aim and Research Questions 3 1.3. Relevance to Human Rights 4 1.4. Delimitation 4 1.5. Disposition 5 2. Method 5 2.1. Empirical Data 5 2.2. Comparative Legal Method 6 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intentional Creation of Fetal Tissue for Transplants: the Womb As a Fetus Farm, 21 J
    UIC Law Review Volume 21 Issue 4 Article 6 Summer 1988 The Intentional Creation of Fetal Tissue for Transplants: The Womb as a Fetus Farm, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 853 (1988) James David Roberts Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Family Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Legislation Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation James David Roberts, The Intentional Creation of Fetal Tissue for Transplants: The Womb as a Fetus Farm, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 853 (1988) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol21/iss4/6 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INTENTIONAL CREATION OF FETAL TISSUE FOR TRANSPLANTS: THE WOMB AS A FETUS FARM? December 3, 1987 marked the twentieth anniversary of the first successful human heart transplant.1 January 22, 1988 marked the fifteenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade.2 Although these two events may once have seemed unrelated, modern medical technology has advanced to a point where an aborted fetus can now be used in transplant operations.' Currently, however, the demand for organs to transplant into new- born infants far exceeds those available from suitable donors.4 In addition, fetal tissues may be useful in the treatment of some adult diseases.5 This demand has led some women to consider using their rights to conceive and abort in order to produce these much needed organs and tissues.6 Along with the medical advances that make the intentional creation of human organs a reality come legal and moral issues not yet squarely addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion: Background Reference Document for Minnesota Legislators
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp ABORTION: BACKGROUND REFERENCE DOCUMENT FOR MINNESOTA LEGISLATORS KATHRYN LAMP APRIL 1979 STATE OF MINNESOTA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES RESEARCH DEPARTMENT 17 STATE CAPITOL Sr. PAUL~ MINNESOTA 55155 PREFACE The paper which follows is a revision of a background reference document on abortion completed last year by the House Research Department. The purpose of this revision is to update and con­ solidate the material presented earlier. This paper is shorter than the earlier version and I believe easier to use. It is presented as a reference tool for Minnesota Legislators on the subject of abortion. The paper answers many questions commonly asked by legislators in an attempt to provide straight-forward unbiased information on the subject. There is no attempt to draw conclusions or suggest policy direction. This revision was prepared by Jill Alverson, Research Assistant in the House Research Department under the supervision of Kathy Lamp, Legislative Analyst, House Research. Comments and questions re­ garding this paper should be directed to Kathy Lamp, 296-8639. Peter B. Levine, Director Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Background A. Definitions . 1 B. Demographics. 3 Reported Induced Abortions by Method By Complications and Residence. • • • • • • • • • . • . • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . • 4 Reported Induced Abortions by Method by Weeks of Ges ta tion . .................................... ·· . 5 An Overview of Abortions in Minnesota................. 7 Table The Minnesota Abortion Surveillance - Selected Tables 1 Abortions by Age •••••••.•••.••••• ~ • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • 11 2 Abortions by Race/Ethnic Group •••••••••••••••••••••.•••••• 12 3 Abortions by Weeks of Gestation •••••••••••.••••••••••••••.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Choices: Where to Draw the Line on Limiting Selection in the Selective Reduction of Multifetal Pregnancies Mary A
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 2016 Hard Choices: Where to Draw the Line on Limiting Selection in the Selective Reduction of Multifetal Pregnancies Mary A. Scott Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Scott, Mary A., "Hard Choices: Where to Draw the Line on Limiting Selection in the Selective Reduction of Multifetal Pregnancies" (2016). Minnesota Law Review. 202. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/202 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Note Hard Choices: Where To Draw the Line on Limiting Selection in the Selective Reduction of Multifetal Pregnancies Mary A. Scott* Imagine a hopeful mother, desperate after many failed at- tempts to become pregnant. She consults a fertility clinic and decides to undergo the invasive and costly process of in vitro fertilization (IVF). The procedure is more than successful—she finds herself pregnant with quadruplets. At less than five feet tall and with a petite frame, she will not be able to carry all four fetuses to term. Her doctor recommends an abortion, but she is unwilling to sacrifice the pregnancy. In 1984, such a pa- tient came to Mark Evans, an obstetrician-geneticist who per- formed the first procedure now known as selective reduction— the termination of one or more fetuses in a multifetal pregnan- cy.1 As reproductive technology has become more accessible in recent years, the number of multifetal pregnancies has sky- rocketed.2 Due to the risks inherent in multifetal pregnancies,3 * J.D.
    [Show full text]