First Trimester Abortion Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Trimester Abortion Care in Low and Middle-Income Countries CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY Volume 00, Number 00, 000–000 Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. First Trimester Abortion Care in Low and Middle-income Countries ANDREA HENKEL, MD, and KATE A. SHAW, MD, MS Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California Abstract: Access to first trimester abortions has account for ~86% of all abortions.1 The increased significantly in the past few decades in low vast majority, nearly 90% of abortions, and middle-income countries. Manual vacuum aspi- ration is now standard of care for procedural abortion take place in the first trimester. Increased and postabortion care. Medication abortion has access to technology enabling earlier de- shifted abortions to being performed earlier in preg- tection of pregnancy and the rising access nancy and is becoming more widely available with to and use of medication abortion have new service delivery strategies to broaden access. shifted abortions to being performed ear- Widespread availability of misoprostol has made abortions induced outside of the formal medical sector lier in pregnancy. overall safer. In both legally restrictive and supportive In many LMICs, girls are attending environments, there is increased interested in self- school longer, more women are working managed abortions as part of a shift towards deme- outside of the home, and the age at first dicalizing abortion through task-sharing. marriage has increased. Consequently, Key words: abortion, first-trimester, manual vacuum aspirator, misoprostol, mifepristone, self-managed more women desire to delay childbearing and seek greater control over birth-spac- ing. In addition, desired family size has fallen dramatically; the increased desire for Introduction smaller families being most appreciable in Globally, an estimated 56.3 million abor- Asia, Europe, and Central America.2 tions occur each year; those occurring in Rates of unintended and mistimed preg- low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs) nancies have decreased with increasing access to and use of contraception, result- Correspondence: Kate Shaw, MD, MS, Department of ing in a decline in global abortion rates.3 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Stanford University, However, where access to contraception Stanford, CA. E-mail: [email protected] lags behind women’s changing fertility The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose. preferences, women may turn to abortion CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY / VOLUME 00 / NUMBER 00 / ’’ 2021 www.clinicalobgyn.com | 1 Copyright r 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. 2 Henkel and Shaw as a way of controlling their fertility. Similarly, after abortion was legalized Therefore, the incidence of abortions may in 2004 in Nepal, the number of women be most reflective of the level of unmet admitted for complications of unsafe need for contraception and contraceptive abortion and the severity of those com- effectiveness in a given geographic area. plications significantly declined; the total number of maternal deaths in Nepal also declined.8 International Abortion Policy Access may depend on what is practi- In the last 20 years, > 30 countries have cally available beyond what is legally amended their laws to expand access to available. The United States remains the safe and legal abortion services.4 How- single largest donor to family planning ever, that still leaves over 40% of women and reproductive health programs over- of reproductive-age living in a country seas.9 However, 2 long standing US pol- where abortion remains highly restricted. icies significantly limit access to abortion: Nearly all countries with the most highly the 1973 Helms amendment, which pro- restrictive laws are LMICs. While there hibits the use of US foreign assistance has been progress in legislatively liberal- funds to pay for the provision of abortion izing abortion access in many LMICs, El services, followed by the 1984 Mexico Salvador and Nicaragua are the notable City Policy, requiring foreign nongovern- exceptions and have taken steps to addi- mental organizations to certify that they tionally restrict abortion. will not perform or promote abortion as a The legislative environment in a coun- method of family planning as a condition try directly impacts the safety of abortion of receiving US funding. Both policies in that country. When legal access to have been rescinded and reinstated by abortion is restricted, women look to alternating administrations along parti- alternatives outside of the formal health san lines and has now been in effect for 19 care sector. Consequently, the prevalence of the past 34 years. of unsafe abortions increases when abor- Many organizations affected by this tion restrictions increase, from 1% of all policy also provide contraception. In an abortions being unsafe in countries with analysis of countries in sub-Saharan Afri- the least-restrictive laws to 31% in those in ca, the use of contraception declined by the most-restrictive laws.5 As restrictive 14% in countries with high-exposure to abortion laws tend to coincide with re- the Mexico City Policy compared with stricting access to modern contraception, those with low-exposure during periods the number of unintended pregnancies when the policy was in place.10 Conse- has increased in LMICs with the most quently, abortion rates increased by 40% restrictive abortion laws.6 As a result, in countries with high-exposure compared abortion rates are paradoxically highest with those countries with low-exposure. in the most legislatively restrictive By reducing these organizations’ ability countries. to supply modern contraceptives, the The impact of liberalizing abortion Mexico City Policy, ironically, increases laws on decreasing maternal mortality abortion rates. has been well characterized in the liter- ature. Six years after liberalizing its abor- tion laws, South Africa saw a 50% decrease in maternal mortality as rates Unsafe Abortion and of unsafe abortion fell; the number of Postabortion Care (PAC) hospitalizations and severity of postabor- Unsafe abortion remains a top 5 causes of tion complications fell markedly as well.7 maternal mortality with an estimated www.clinicalobgyn.com Copyright r 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. First Trimester Abortion Care in LMIC 3 47,000 deaths annually attributed to un- globally are unsafe—31% are less safe and safe abortion; nearly all occurring in 14% are least safe.5 Of the estimated 25 LMIC countries.11 A recent systematic million unsafe abortions each year, 97% analysis estimates that 8% of all maternal take place in LMICs. deaths are due to unsafe abortion.12 This Women and untrained providers use finding is lower than the previous assess- many types of traditional and nonmedical ments, either suggesting that maternal methods to end unintended pregnancies. mortality due to unsafe abortion is de- Past reports were rife with women insert- creasing or misclassification and under- ing foreign objects into the vagina or reporting are artificially lowering reports. cervix, liquids into the vagina, consuming There is significant geographic variation alcohol, detergent, bleach, acid, turpen- in proportion of maternal deaths tine, teas or pharmaceuticals, or inducing attributed unsafe abortions: 0.8% in east- trauma to the abdomen. Fortunately, ern Asia, 9.9% in Latin America and the women seeking to terminate a pregnancy Caribbean, and 9.6% in sub-Saharan are increasingly able to obtain misopros- Africa. tol to self-induce an abortion in response The World Health Organization to the WHO’s listing of misoprostol on (WHO) defines unsafe abortion as a the Essential Medication List in 2009.14 procedure for terminating a pregnancy As a result, unsafe abortions are now performed by persons lacking the neces- less unsafe because fewer occur by inva- sary skills or in an environment not in sive or toxic methods. However, women conformity with minimal medical stand- using misoprostol remain at risk of com- ards, or both.13 With recent changes in plications if they cannot get the necessary abortion provision and methods, a broad- information to use the method correctly. er, more nuanced conceptual framework PAC treatment rates have not declined has been proposed to update the WHO despite the increase in access to misopros- definition in 2017.5 According to this tol-only abortions.15 This may reflect a framework, abortions would fall into 1 combination of a relatively high first- of 3 categories: safe, less safe, and least trimester failure rate associated with a safe (with the latter 2 categories together misoprostol-only regimen, many women comprising unsafe abortions). An abor- are inadequately informed about what to tion is classified as safe if it takes place expect and seek care for what is an using a safe method and is done by an otherwise anticipated clinical course of appropriately trained provider (per WHO bleeding or cramping, and some providers guidelines above); less-safe abortions are specifically instruct women to go to facili- those that meet only one of the 2 criteria, ties for surgical aspiration soon after and least-safe abortions are those that bleeding starts.16 meet neither standard (Table 1). Using In 2012, almost 7 million women this definition, about 45% of abortions were treated for complications of unsafe
Recommended publications
  • Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and Future Development Efforts in Sub- Saharan Africa
    Anthós Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 1 4-2010 Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and future Development Efforts in sub- Saharan Africa Katherine Clare Alexander Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anthos Part of the Political History Commons, Public Policy Commons, Women's Health Commons, and the Women's History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Alexander, Katherine Clare (2010) "Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and future Development Efforts in sub-Saharan Africa," Anthós: Vol. 2: Iss. 1, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15760/anthos.2010.1 This open access Article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team. Anticipated Effects of the U.S. Mexico City Policy on the Attainability of the Millennium Development Goals and future Development Efforts in sub-Saharan Africa By: Katherine Clare Alexander In the low-income countries of sub-Saharan Africa, the performance of pyramidal reproductive health and family planning services with public outreach initiatives has not met the expectations or the needs of the communities they serve. Insufficient case management, limited management capacity and referral and communication failures are challenges faced on the delivery level, while on the policy level these health clinics face insufficient coordination among organizations and weak links between programs (Schneider, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Snapshot of the Status of Women in Brazil 2019
    A SNAPSHOT OF THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN BRAZIL 2019 A Snapshot of the Status of Women in Brazil: 2019 Edited by Anna Prusa and Lara Picanço Brazil Institute | Wilson Center Washington, DC © Woodrow Wilson Interantional Center for Scholars 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Letter from the Editors Anna Prusa and Lara Picanço 6 Stuck in the Middle: Gender Violence Alison Brysk 8 Maternal Health: Persistent Challenges Continue to Endanger Women’s Lives Sarah B. Barnes 12 Women in Politics Malu A. C. Gatto 16 A View from the Private Sector: Closing Our Gender Gap at Azul Carolyn Trabuco 18 Women in Science: Still Invisible? Fernanda De Negri 20 Women in the Fight Against Corruption Tiffany D. Barnes 24 Gender Equity on the Bench and Before the Law Tainá Machado de Almeida Castro 28 Contemporary Racism, Sexism, and Slave Labor Mércia Consolação Silva 32 Women in Combat: The Long Path Toward Integration in the Armed Forces Lívia Peres Milani 34 On the Margins: Black Women, Public Policies, and Black Feminism Claudielle Pavão da Silva Letter from the Editors Anna Prusa & Lara Picanço The status of women in Brazil is emblematic of the country’s internal tensions. Brazil is a country where a woman can become president; yet it also has one of the highest rates of femicide—the killing of women due to their gender—in the world.1 The 2018 elections underscored the growing polarization of this issue in Brazil. Even as a record number of women ran for office and won seats at all levels of government, the election also ushered in a far more conservative administration that has sought to reinforce traditional gender roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Supreme Court Decides Cases En Banc Or by One of Its Two Panels Or Chambers
    [. Below is the chamber’s 3 x 2 majority opinion, authored by its president, Justice Barroso.] WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 124.306 RIO DE JANEIRO STATE1 ORIGINAL RAPPORTEUR: JUSTICE MARCO AURÉLIO RAPPORTEUR FOR THE MAJORITY OPINION: JUSTICE LUÍS ROBERTO BARROSO DEFENDANT(S): EDILSON DOS SANTOS DEFENDANT(S): ROSEMERE APARECIDA FERREIRA PETITIONER(S): JAIR LEITE PEREIRA RESPONDENT(S) AUTHORITY(IES): SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE MAJORITY OPINION2 JUSTICE LUÍS ROBERTO BARROSO: Syllabus: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. PRETRIAL DETENTION. ABSENCE OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ITS DECREE. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE INCIDENCE OF THE PENAL OFFENCE OF ABORTION IN CASE OF VOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY DURING THE FIRST TRIMESTER. RELEASE FROM CUSTODY. ORDER GRANTED “EX OFFICIO”. 1. The writ of habeas corpus is not applicable to the case at bar. However, the situation demands that the order be granted “ex officio” on two grounds, for the purpose of releasing the defendants from pretrial detention. 2. First, the original pretrial detention does not meet the legal requirements for the measure, namely: risks to public order, economic order, the criminal investigation or the enforcement of criminal law (article 312 of the Criminal Procedure Code). The 1 The English version of this opinion was edited by Sara Huddleston and revised by Professor Paulo Barrozo, Associate Professor at Boston College Law School. 2 The Brazilian Supreme Court decides cases en banc or by one of its two panels or chambers. Five justices compose each chamber. Although Justice Luís Roberto Barroso was not the original justice-rapporteur in this case, his opinion was joined by the majority of the First Chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GLOBAL GAG RULE the Unintended Consequences of US Abortion Policy Abroad by Emily Ausubel
    THE GLOBAL GAG RULE The Unintended Consequences of US Abortion Policy Abroad By Emily Ausubel Emily Ausubel is a frst-year Master in Public Policy candidate at the Harvard Kennedy School concentrating in International and Global Afairs. Before coming to HKS, Emily worked at global health organizations in the US and Uganda. Emily is passionate about advancing women’s health and preventing sexual and gender- based violence. pproximately 55 million abortions take A HISTORY OF US FOREIGN POLICY A place each year globally.1 In the United TOWARD ABORTION States, abortion is a deeply contentious In 1973, Congress passed the Helms issue, occupying a rift between religious and Amendment to the US Foreign Assistance Act, non-religious—and, often by proxy, conser- which prohibited direct US federal funding of vative and liberal—Americans. In the 1970s, abortion services outside of the United States. the US government started passing legisla- Under this policy, such organizations could tion to remove US funding from abortion-re- use other funds for abortion services through lated services, both domestically and globally. separate accounts.2 However, many pro-life While some policies have likely succeeded in Americans argued that even funding these eliminating direct US funding of abortions organizations to provide other services was abroad, there is mounting evidence that they comparable to funding abortion (sometimes also have widespread negative effects on the referred to as the “fungibility argument”).3 In lives of some of the most vulnerable
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 ABORTION WORLDWIDE Abortions have been available in all cultures since ancient times (1, 2). Nowadays, an estimated 43.8 million abortions are carried out worldwide each year. About one in five pregnancies ends in an abortion (3). Each year, approximately 21.6 million women worldwide still undergo an unsafe abortion, resulting in an estimated 47000 deaths, largely among the most vulnerable women, such as poor, unmarried and young women in particular. Apart from the deaths caused by unsafe abortions, another 5 million women per year have to deal with temporary or permanent disabilities and are accompanied by huge financial and social costs to themselves, their families and the health care systems (4, 5). Goal 5 of the Millennium Development Goals is to reduce the maternal mortality ratio in 25 years by 75% and to achieve universal access to reproductive health care by 2015 (6). Unsafe abortion is one of the main causes of maternal mortality and could be prevented. Complications from unsafe abortion accounted for an estimated 13% of all maternal deaths worldwide (7). The definition of unsafe abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) is: a procedure for terminating a pregnancy that is performed by an individual lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both. Recently, the WHO added the following: “The persons, skills, and medical standards considered safe in the provision of abortion are different for medical and surgical abortion, and also depend on the duration of pregnancy. What is considered “safe” should be interpreted in line with the current WHO technical and policy guidance” (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Menstrual Regulation, Unsafe Abortion and Maternal Health In
    In Brief Series 2012, No.3 Menstrual Regulation, Unsafe Abortion And Maternal Health in Bangladesh Key Points Maternal mortality has declined considerably in Bangladesh • Unsafe clandestine abortion persists in over the past few decades. Some of that decline—though Bangladesh. In 2010, some 231,000 led to complications that were treated at health precisely how much cannot be quantified—is likely facilities, but another 341,000 cases were attributable to the country’s menstrual regulation program, not. In all, 572,000 unsafe procedures led to complications that year. which allows women to establish nonpregnancy safely after • Recourse to unsafe abortion can be a missed period and thus avoid recourse to unsafe abortion. avoided by use of the safe, government sanctioned service of menstrual regulation Bangladesh is making solid progress childbirth by improving access to ma- (MR)—establishing nonpregnancy after a toward meeting the Millennium Develop- ternal health care and lowering fertility, missed period, most often using manual vacuum aspiration. In 2010, an estimated ment Goal of reducing maternal mortal- especially births that pose above-average 653,000 women obtained MRs, a rate of ity by three-quarters between 1990 and health risks (e.g., those to high-parity 18 per 1,000 women of reproductive age. 2015.1 According to a commonly used women). What makes the country unique, indicator, the maternal mortality ratio, however, is the potential contribution of • The rate at which MRs result in complica- maternal deaths fell by at least 60% from an authorized procedure—known as tions that are treated in facilities is 1990 to 2010–2011 (Figure 1, page 2).2,3 menstrual regulation, or MR—to “estab- one-third that of the complications The two official government studies of lish nonpregnancy” after a missed period.6 of induced abortions—120 per 1,000 MRs maternal mortality (known as Bangla- vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing Abortion: a Phenomenological Investigation
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-1998 Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation Kathryn Rea Smith University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Kathryn Rea, "Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1998. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2514 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathryn Rea Smith entitled "Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education. Mark Hector, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Howard Pollio, Patricia Droppleman, Sandra Thomas Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council : I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Kathryn Rea Smith entitled "Experiencing Abortion: A Phenomenological Investigation." I have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 How Sociologists View Social Problems: the Abortion Dilemma
    How Sociologists View Social Problems: 1 The Abortion Dilemma Listen to Chapter 1 on MySocLab Learning Objectives. After reading this chapter, you should be able to: 1.1 Understand the sociological imagination 1.5 Describe the contributions that sociologist can (sociological perspective), explain the difference make in studying social problems. (p. 15) between a personal and a social problem, and 1.6 Explain why common sense is not adequate to explain the significance of social location. (p. 2) understand social problems. (p. 17) 1.2 Understand that sociologists can use social 1.7 Understand the four basic research designs and location to predict group behavior but not research methods that sociologists use to study individual behavior. (p. 4) social problems. (p. 17) 1.3 Explain why a social problem consists of both 1.8 Summarize the disagreement in sociology regard- objective conditions and subjective concerns ing whether or not sociologists should choose and why social problems are relative. (p. 5) sides. (p. 21) 1.4 Identify the four stages through which social problems evolve. (p. 7) 1 M01_HENS5120_11_SE_C01.indd 1 5/23/13 7:15 AM 1.1 isa felt desperate. The argument with her you think it is, a puppy?” Lgrandmother seemed to have gone on for- “You’re being ridiculous! You’re trying to ever, and they both were now at their wits’ end. judge my life by your standards. You never “You don’t know what you’re doing, Lisa. wanted a career. All you ever wanted was to You’re taking the life of an innocent baby!” her raise a family.” grandmother said once again.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Northern Ireland's Abortion Laws on Women's Abortion Decision-Making and Experiences
    Downloaded from http://srh.bmj.com on January 16, 2019 - Published by group.bmj.com Research The impact of Northern Ireland’s abortion laws on women’s abortion decision-making and experiences Abigail R A Aiken,1,2 Elisa Padron,3 Kathleen Broussard,2,4 Dana Johnson1 1LBJ School of Public Affairs, ABSTRACT University of Texas at Austin, Key messages Background In Northern Ireland, abortion is Austin, Texas, USA 2 Population Research Center, illegal except in very limited circumstances to ► Women in Northern Ireland still University of Texas at Austin, preserve a woman’s life or to prevent permanent experience multiple barriers to travelling Austin, Texas, USA or long-term injury to her physical or mental 3College of Natural Sciences, to access abortion care even though University of Texas at Austin, health. Abortions conducted outside the law are abortions are now provided free in Great Austin, Texas, USA a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. Britain. 4Department of Sociology, We assessed the impacts of Northern Ireland’s ► Self-managed medication abortion using University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA abortion laws on women's decision-making and online telemedicine may be preferred experiences in accessing abortion. over travel due its convenience and Correspondence to Methods Between April 2017 and February safety, but the experience is dominated Dr Abigail R A Aiken, LBJ School 2018 we interviewed 30 women living in by fear and isolation due to the risk of of Public Affairs, University Northern Ireland who had sought abortion prosecution. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713, USA; araa2@ utexas.
    [Show full text]
  • B1 Self Managed Abortion
    B1- Ensuring Support for and Access to Self-Managed Abortion 1 I. Title: Ensuring Support for and Access to Self-Managed Abortion 2 3 II. Author Identification 4 • Monique Baumont, Center for Reproductive Rights, 199 Water St, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 5 10038, [email protected], Member #10432693, Sexual and Reproductive Health 6 Section 7 • Bonnie K Epstein, unaffiliated, 4403 Riverview Ave, Englewood, NJ 07631, 8 [email protected]. Member #9855820, Sexual and Reproductive Health Section. 9 • Caitlin Phelps, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 409 12th Street, SW 10 Washington, DC 20024-2188, [email protected], Member #9847505, Sexual and Reproductive 11 Health Section 12 • Silpa Srinivasulu, Reproductive Health Access Project, P.O. Box 21191, New York, NY 10025, 13 [email protected], Member #10338166, Sexual and Reproductive Health Section 14 15 III. Co-Sponsorship: Sexual and Reproductive Health Section 16 17 IV. Collaborating Units: N/A 18 19 V. Endorsement: International Health Section 20 21 VI. Summary 22 Access to abortion care is essential to the health, well-being, and bodily autonomy of pregnant 23 people and their families. While the right to abortion is constitutionally protected in the U.S., restrictive 24 state and federal legislation and regulations have eroded this right. These policies have exacerbated 25 structural inequities to undermine and impede access to care, disproportionately affecting Black, 26 Indigenous, and people of color, those with lower incomes, immigrants, and people in rural areas. Due to 27 logistical and financial barriers to accessing abortion care, and some people’s personal preferences and 28 experiences of stigma and structural racism with respect to the medical system, there has been 29 considerable growth in demand for self-managed abortion in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsafe Abortion in Brazil: a Systematic Review of the Scientific Production, 2008-2018 Aborto Inseguro No Brasil
    REVISÃO REVIEW Aborto inseguro no Brasil: revisão sistemática da produção científica, 2008-2018 Unsafe abortion in Brazil: a systematic review of the scientific production, 2008-2018 Aborto inseguro en Brasil: revisión sistemática de la producción científica, 2008-2018 Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues 1 Sandra Costa Fonseca 2 Maria do Carmo Leal 3 Estela M. L. Aquino 4 Greice M. S. Menezes 4 doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00190418 Resumo Correspondência R. M. S. M. Domingues Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação O objetivo deste estudo é atualizar o conhecimento sobre o aborto inseguro Oswaldo Cruz. no país. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática com busca e seleção de estudos Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21040-360, Brasil. via MEDLINE e LILACS, sem restrição de idiomas, no período 2008 a 2018, [email protected] com avaliação da qualidade dos artigos por meio dos instrumentos elaborados 1 pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs. Foram avaliados 50 artigos. A prevalência de Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. aborto induzido no Brasil foi estimada por método direto em 15% no ano de 2 Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal Fluminense, 2010 e 13% no ano de 2016. Prevalências mais elevadas foram observadas Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. em populações socialmente mais vulneráveis. A razão de aborto induzido por 3 Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação 1.000 mulheres em idade fértil reduziu no período 1995-2013, sendo de 16 por Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 4 Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1.000 em 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexico City Policy
    Fact Sheet The Mexico City Policy Summary: The Mexico City Policy specifies that federal funds for family planning are available only to foreign nongovernmental organizations that agree not to perform or promote abortion as a method of family planning in other countries. This policy was put in place by President Reagan in 1984, but rescinded by President Clinton in 1993. Efforts to restore the policy by Congressional action were successful only for FY 2000 when a compromise was enacted into law. However, in 2001, the policy was reinstated by President George W. Bush. Since then, abortion advocates have been conducting a campaign to reverse the President’s action. What are the origins of the Mexico City City Policy. However, some 57 IPPF affiliates Policy? worldwide, including IPPF/Western Hemisphere (operating in Latin America), agreed to the During the 1970's and early 1980's, U.S. federal tax "contraceptives only" requirement and thus continued dollars were the major source of funding for private to receive U.S. funds. Planned Parenthood Federation organizations that promoted abortion in Third World of America (PPFA) also refused to agree to USAID countries. At the 1984 International Conference on limitations; after legal action, PPFA's grant of $18 Population in Mexico City, sponsored by the United million was cut off as of Oct. 31, 1990. Nations, the Reagan Administration announced new guidelines on the use of U.S. foreign aid funds for Is the Mexico City Policy constitutional? family planning. These limitations became known as The Mexico City Policy was challenged and upheld the "Mexico City Policy." The policy stated: in federal court on both statutory and constitutional The United Nations Declaration of the Rights grounds.
    [Show full text]