DOCSLIB.ORG

Plato and Greek Prose

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plato and Greek Prose GK 365 (#33510) / 385 (#33540) Fall 2013 Plato and Greek Prose Class meets: TT 11-12:15 in WAG 112 Steve White (512-475-7457) Office hours: Tu 3:30-4:30, W 2-4, and by appointment in WAG 117 [email protected] The main goal of this course is to improve your facility in reading and understanding Greek. We will achieve that goal by reading, translating, and analyzing a representative selection of classical prose: some of Plato’s Republic and work by several contemporaries: Antiphon, Demosthenes, Gorgias, Herodotus, Isocrates, Lysias, and Thucydides. The innovations and influence of leading sophists and orators will be a recurrent theme, and we will also track the development and diversity of prose style in Attic oratory. Students in GK 365 will have additional writing assignments; students in GK 385 additional reading. Our time in class will be devoted mainly to translating Greek, and in the process, examining points of syntax, morphology, diction, and style. Initial assignments will be limited to what we can cover in class; but the pace will pick up as we proceed. Tuesdays will normally focus on close reading; Thursdays will allow for wider perspectives. You will have written exercises, oral presentations, and two translation tests along the way, and a comprehensive final exam; all three tests will include unseen passages, aka sight translation. Secondary reading will be modest. Students in 365 will also prepare a research paper (in stages: proposal, plan, draft, oral report, final 8-12 pp). Students in 385 will be responsible for reading an additional 50 OCT pp on their own (selections approved by Oct. 1 and covered on the final). Grades will be based on the following work: For 365: class participation and exercises 20%, tests 30%, final exam 25%, research project 25%. For 385: class participation and exercises 20%, tests 40%, final exam (trans exam format) 40%. Grading scale: A = 93 or above, A– = 90-92, B+ = 87-89, etc. Note: GK 365 carries both the Independent Inquiry Flag and the Writing Flag because the syllabus is designed to help you develop proficiency in methods of research and writing used in classical scholarship. Shorter exercises will give you practice in analyzing and summarizing readings, formulating questions, and using print and online databases; your research project will give you the opportunity to develop a topic of your own from start to finish, with feedback along the way. The final paper should be 8-12 pp, and you will present a preliminary oral report on your work to the class near the end of the semester. Texts: I asked the COOP to order the three books listed below. Other readings will be distributed in class, posted on Blackboard, or available in the library, most on Course Reserve in the Classics Library. Plato: Republic Book 1. ed. G. Rose (Hackett 1983: ISBN 978-0-929524-313) H.W. Smyth, Greek Grammar (Harvard UP 1956: ISBN 9780674362505) Recommended: Platonis Opera, vol. 3, ed. J. Burnet (OCT 1902: ISBN 9780198145448) Every serious student of Greek should have handy Smyth’s Grammar, a true vademecum. The OCT is the standard text for Plato, reprinted in Rose’s booklet, which provides useful notes on basic grammar. Other helpful works, including commentaries, translations, and ancillary works, are on Course Reserve (see reverse) and in the Classics Reference collection (both in WAG 1). Especially notable: Lexica: H.G. Liddell & R. Scott, rev. S. Jones, A Greek Lexicon (Oxford 1940: 9th ed.) remains the best single guide to Greek diction; the little Liddell and middle Liddell may be more helpful initially for daily use, but you should develop familiarity with “the great Scott” (aka LSJ) as we proceed. LSJ online: http://stephanus.tlg.uci.edu.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/lsj/#eid=1&context=lsj Also J.D. Denniston, The Greek Particles (1954) and lexica for individual authors, including F. Ast (1835) and L. Brandwood (1976) for Plato: all in the Classics Reference collection. Translations: I recommend reading the whole of each work in translation before we tackle the Greek in class. The market is awash in flotsam new and old, which makes finding reliable translations daunting. Your best bet for accuracy and fluency are Tom Griffith’s Republic (CUP 2000) and the UT Press series Oratory of Classical Greece, edited by our own Michael Gagarin (on reserve). For the rest of Plato, your best bet is Plato: Complete Works, ed. John Cooper (Hackett 1997). The Loebs for Plato, some of the orators, and others are often misleading: caveat lector! Likewise for older versions online, typically outdated and more valuable as specimens of antique style than accurate rendition (so Rev. Jowett’s Plato). GK 365 (#33510) / 385 (#33540) Fall 2013 Syllabus: readings and major assignments Date Reading Other assignments 1. Aug. 29 Orientation 2. Sep. 3 & 5 Republic 327a-331b 3. Sep. 10 & 12 Republic 331c-336a 4. Sep. 17 & 19 Herodotus 1.1-16 Tu 9/17: Translation #1 5. Sep. 24 & 26 Lysias 3: Against Simon 6. Oct. 1 & 3 Republic 336b-342e Tu 10/1: Test #1 7. Oct. 8 & 10 Republic 343a-350c 8. Oct. 15 & 17 Gorgias 11: Helen 9. Oct. 22 & 24 Antiphon 3: Second Tetralogy 10. Oct. 29 & 31 Thucydides 2.59-65: Pericles Th 10/31: Translation #2 11. Nov. 5 & 7 Isocrates 13: Against the Sophists Th 11/7: Test #2 12. Nov. 12 & 14 Republic 350d-360d 13. Nov. 19 & 21 Republic 360e-369a 14. Nov. 26 Oral reports Th 11/28: no class (Charites) 15. Dec. 3 & 5 Demosthenes 1: Olynthiac 1 M 12/9: research papers due & Dec. 11 Final exam: Wednesday 9-12 noon Course Reserves in the Classics Library (WAG 1): commentaries, translations, background. Antiphon: The Speeches, ed. M. Gagarin (Cambridge 1997). Antiphon & Andocides, trans. M. Gagarin & D.M. MacDowell (Austin 1998). Aristotle: On Rhetoric, trans. G.A. Kennedy (Oxford 1991). The First Philippic and the Olynthiacs of Demosthenes, ed. J.E. Sandys (London 1936). Demosthenes: Speeches 1-17, trans. J. Trevett (Austin 2011). Gorgias: Encomium of Helen, ed. D.M. MacDowell (Bristol 1982). Herodotus: Histories 1, ed. G. Steadman (2012): http://geoffreysteadman.com/files-herodotus/ For Isocrates 13: R.C. Jebb, Selections from the Attic Orators (London 1888). Isocrates I, trans. D. Mirhady & Yun Lee Too (Austin 2000). Lysias: Selected Speeches, ed. C. Carey (Cambridge 1989). Lysias: Speeches, trans. S.C. Todd (Austin 2000). Plato: Republic 1, ed. D.J. Allan (Cambridge 1965). Platonis Respublica, ed. S. Slings (OCT 2003). Plato: Republic 1, ed. G. Steadman (2012): http://geoffreysteadman.com/files-republic-i/ Plato: Republic, trans. T. Griffith (Cambridge 2000), translation only: online. Plato: Complete Works, ed. J. Cooper (Indianapolis 1997). Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War, Book II, ed. J. Rusten (Cambridge 1989). J.D. Denniston, Greek Prose Style (Oxford 1952). K.J. Dover, The Evolution of Greek Prose Style (Oxford 1997). G. Fine, ed. Oxford Handbook of Plato (Oxford 2008). S. Goldhill, The Invention of Prose (Oxford 2002). G.A. Kennedy, The Art of Persuasion in Greece (Princeton 1963). R. Kraut, ed. Cambridge Companion to Plato (Cambridge 1992). L.R. Palmer, The Greek Language (London 1980). D.A. Russell, An Anthology of Greek Prose (Oxford 1991). GK 365 (#33510) / 385 (#33540) Fall 2013 Other Policies UT Honor Code: The core values of UT Austin are learning, discovery, freedom, leadership, individual opportunity, and responsibility. Each member of the university is expected to uphold these values through integrity, honesty, trust, fairness, and respect toward peers and community. Attendance and active participation are crucial for both your own progress and everyone else’s too. You may miss 1 class no questions asked. Beyond that, unexcused absences will cost you 2% of your overall course grade; acceptable excuses are medical or other emergencies (documentation required), religious holidays (see below), and personal obligations (with at least 1-week advance notice and at my discretion). Note: You are responsible for all material we cover in your absence, excused or not. Late work is liable to a penalty (typically 1% every 12 hours) unless you have a legitimate excuse. Make-up tests: Only for exceptional and fully documented reasons, and at my discretion. Grade questions: We’ll follow the 24/7 rule in this course: take 24 hours to review your graded work before questioning your grade; and questions must be raised within 7 days of my returning your work. Religious holidays: If you need to miss class for a religious holiday, you must notify me at least 14 days in advance so we can make alternative arrangements for your absence. Writing Center: Students in 365 are encouraged to use the Undergraduate Writing Center in FAC 211 (471-6222: http://www.uwc.utexas.edu/). UWC offers free, individualized, expert help with writing for any UT undergraduate, by appointment or on a drop-in basis. Their trained consultants can help you develop strategies to improve your writing and become a more independent writer for academic and non- academic purposes alike. Whether or not you’re having “problems” in writing, getting feedback from an informed audience is a normal part of a successful writing project. Academic integrity: Scholastic dishonesty on any graded work will receive 0 credit on that assignment and is liable to be reported to Student Judicial Services (SJS). Scholastic dishonesty is presenting anyone else’s work as your own. It includes cheating on tests; using material from print or other media (including the web) without citation or attribution; likewise paraphrasing such material without citation. It is your responsibility as university students to know what counts as scholastic dishonesty and to refrain from it. For info, consult SJS: http://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sjs/scholdis.php Accommodations: UT Austin provides upon request appropriate academic accommodations for qualified students with disabilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Citations in Classics and Ancient History
    Citations in Classics and Ancient History The most common style in use in the field of Classical Studies is the author-date style, also known as Chicago 2, but MLA is also quite common and perfectly acceptable. Quick guides for each of MLA and Chicago 2 are readily available as PDF downloads. The Chicago Manual of Style Online offers a guide on their web-page: http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html The Modern Language Association (MLA) does not, but many educational institutions post an MLA guide for free access. While a specific citation style should be followed carefully, none take into account the specific practices of Classical Studies. They are all (Chicago, MLA and others) perfectly suitable for citing most resources, but should not be followed for citing ancient Greek and Latin primary source material, including primary sources in translation. Citing Primary Sources: Every ancient text has its own unique system for locating content by numbers. For example, Homer's Iliad is divided into 24 Books (what we might now call chapters) and the lines of each Book are numbered from line 1. Herodotus' Histories is divided into nine Books and each of these Books is divided into Chapters and each chapter into line numbers. The purpose of such a system is that the Iliad, or any primary source, can be cited in any language and from any publication and always refer to the same passage. That is why we do not cite Herodotus page 66. Page 66 in what publication, in what edition? Very early in your textbook, Apodexis Historia, a passage from Herodotus is reproduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Persuasion and Social Order in Classical Greece
    History of Europe 160: Persuasion and Social Order in Classical Greece Spring 2017 Alex Petkas – [email protected] Purpose: In this course students will examine and evaluate the legal system of Athens in the “classical period,” especially the 4th century BC. Beginning in the late 6th century BC, the Athenian city-state developed and implemented the first recorded democracy in western history, and they held the rule of law as expressed in their court system to be a fundamental prerequisite for true “rule by the people.” Upon closer study we will find that, even though they had many strikingly modern conceptions of equality and accountability, the Athenians thought about the function of courts and their role in society very differently than we do. For this reason studying the detailed mechanisms of their legal system and its presuppositions can help us to critically reflect upon our own situation. Assignments Fact Quiz 1 – terminology, definitions, drawn from the readings. Fact Quiz 2 – same (not cumulative) Seminar “Deposition” Paper Abstract Abstract Review Final paper Grading 20% - 2 Quizzes 20% - Deposition 10% - Abstract 10% - Abstract Review 20% - Final Paper 20% - In-Class Participation Seminar Deposition: This assignment has two main purposes. The first and main purpose is for you to enrich the seminar’s discussion with perspectives drawn from further readings beyond the syllabus. The second purpose is to give you the opportunity to explore a topic for the final paper. Your Seminar Deposition should be approximately fifteen minutes long, and be focused around a single primary text which we have all read for the week though you may of course make reference to other texts on and off the syllabus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charge of Φάσις in Lysias 19
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The Charge of φάσις in Lysias 19 Kiran Rajamani Advised by Professor! Robert Germany A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in ! the Department of Classics at Haverford College. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Thank you to my advisor Robert Germany for providing insightful criticism and advice about my topic, and to my parents, siblings, and friends for their support and encouragement. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract Modern scholars on Lysias 19 “On The Property Of Aristophanes” have been divided about whether the plaintiffs who prosecuted the politician Aristophanes’ brother-in-law charged him by γραφή or ἀπογραφή. This paper argues that they charged him by neither of these procedures, but rather charged him by φάσις. The argument that he faced γραφή is unsupportable because none of the extant γραφαί could have been used against him, even those which, at first glance, seem as if they plausibly could have been used. The plausible γραφαί are γραφὴ ἀγραφίου to force registration as a debtor, γραφὴ κλοπῆς for theft of private property, and γραφὴ κλοπῆς for theft of public property. Although he would have owed a debt if found guilty, the text of the speech provides no evidence that he could have faced γραφὴ ἀγραφίου. γραφὴ κλοπῆς for theft of private property was not used to prosecute theft of public property, so the plaintiffs could not have used it to prosecute the defendant, who was on trial for theft of public property. γραφὴ κλοπῆς for private property could not have been used because, based upon the interpretation of Athenaion Politeia 48.4-5 by Cohen 1983, that charge could only be used at a public official’s εὔθυνα, and Aristophanes’ brother-in-law was not a public official.
    [Show full text]
  • Metics and Identity in Democratic Athens
    METICS AND IDENTITY IN DEMOCRATIC ATHENS By MATTHEW JOHN KEARS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham March 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the metics, or resident aliens, in democratic Athens and how they affected ideas of identity, with a particular focus on the fourth century BC. It looks at definitions of the metics and how the restrictions and obligations which marked their status operated; how these affected their lives and their image, in their own eyes and those of the Athenians; how the Athenians erected and maintained a boundary of status and identity between themselves and the metics, in theory and in practice; and how individuals who crossed this boundary could present themselves and be characterised, especially in the public context of the lawcourts. The argument is that the metics served as a contradiction of and challenge to Athenian ideas about who they were and what made them different from others.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Dissertation
    The Performance of Identity in Classical Athens by Allison J. Kemmerle A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in The University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Sara Forsdyke, Chair Associate Professor Ian Moyer Associate Professor Rachel Neis Professor Celia Schultz Assistant Professor Donald Sells Allison J. Kemmerle [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0517-550X DEDICATION To Sara, Christine, and Rachel, φίλταται φίλαι. And most especially to my mother—I’m proud to be your daughter. 'ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation was completed with help from grants given by the Interdepartmental Program in Greek and Roman History, the Eisenberg Institute for Historical Studies, and the Sweetland Dissertation Writing Institute at the University of Michigan. 'iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii ABSTRACT vii CHAPTERS I. Introduction 1 Thesis statement 1 Identifying groups 6 Performances of civic identity 13 Performance studies 20 Summary of chapters 24 II. Citizen Status in Classical Athens 27 Introduction 27 Modern scholarship 30 The Athenian identification process: a brief definition 35 Relatives 38 Phratries 48 Demes 56 iv' The genos and orgeones 66 Conclusion 72 III. Adoption in the Athenian Identification Process 75 Introduction 75 Procedures of adoption in Classical Athens 78 Modern scholarship 81 The estates of Menecles and of Apollodorus 88 Conclusion 104 IV. Neaira and Phano: Attacks on Women’s Citizenship in Classical Athens 107 Introduction 107 Scholarship on the citizen status of women 110 The ideal woman: Xenophon’s wife 115 Neaira 120 Phano 138 Conclusion 153 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric and Conceptualization of Enmity in Classical Athens
    THE RHETORIC AND CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ENMITY IN CLASSICAL ATHENS By ANDREW T. ALWINE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2010 1 © 2010 Andrew T. Alwine 2 Uxori dilectae 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I must first of all thank my chairman, Andrew Wolpert. He helped me through this process at every step and read more of my writing than anyone should be forced to read. He provided constructive criticism that compelled me to think and rethink my arguments. This study is much better for it. Konstantinos Kapparis was also a very helpful mentor. He was always encouraging and willing to meet with me to chat about all things Greek. Many of my conversations with him, both in person and through e-mail, had great influence on my work for the better. I would also like to express my gratitude to Andrea Sterk and Robert Wagman for their support and their willingness to serve on my committee. In addition to the faculty members mentioned above, I wish to thank Mary Ann Eaverly, Timothy Johnson, Jim Marks, Victoria Pagán, and Gonda Van Steen. It would be difficult to say how much time all of them sacrificed to help me become a better scholar, teacher, and colleague. It is certainly difficult to express how much I appreciate it. Among all of the wonderful graduate students at the University of Florida, I must especially thank Todd Bohlander and David Hoot, who were subjected to the experience of revising my work at various stages of incompletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptions of Law in Classical Athens
    CONCEPTIONS OF LAW IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Anna Stevenson King’s College Faculty of Classics University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 1 2 DECLARATION This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not suBstantially the same as any that I have suBmitted, or, is Being concurrently suBmitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of CamBridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no suBstantial part of my dissertation has already Been suBmitted, or, is Being concurrently suBmitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of CamBridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text It does not exceed the prescriBed word limit of 80,000 words. Anna Stevenson 2019 3 4 ABSTRACT CONCEPTIONS OF LAW IN CLASSICAL ATHENS Anna Stevenson This thesis investigates the underlying assumptions Athenians had about their laws: it seeks to ask what Athenians assumed their laws were for, and where they thought those laws got their authority. It neither answers nor seeks to answer the difficult question of how Athenian juries made decisions, But By focussing on Athenian conceptions of their laws it offers a tool for those who would study Athenian litigation and legislating. These questions are first explored through a study of the responses of the restored democracy to the remnants of the Thirty’s attempts at legislating.
    [Show full text]
  • Canevarolawjusticeedited II MC
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Law and justice Citation for published version: Canevaro, M 2018, Law and justice. in G Martin (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 73-85. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: The Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes Publisher Rights Statement: This is a draft of a chapter/article that has been accepted for publication by Oxford University Press in the forthcoming book The Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes by Mirko Canevaro /edited by (Gunther Martin) due for publication in 2018. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Law and Justice Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes Mirko Canevaro (The University of Edinburgh) Introduction The Demosthenic corpus contains 42 judicial speeches (some by Demosthenes and some by other orators). In these speeches issues of justice are central, and legal cases are assessed for their conformity with the laws of Athens. The role of the laws and of justice in the oratory of Demosthenes, in connection with the judges’ expectations and with the rules and institutional habits that determined how these cases were assessed, will be the topic of this chapter (the next chapter REF Gagarin will discuss instead litigants’ strategies in bringing a case to court their choice of procedure).
    [Show full text]
  • Shame in Athenian Oratory
    Shame in Athenian Oratory Sofia Bianchi Mancini BA (Hons) Supervised by: Dr. Errietta Bissa Submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of Masters by Research in Classical Studies University of Wales Trinity Saint David 2018 DECLARATION SHEET This sheet MUST be signed and included within the thesis This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed Sofia Bianchi Mancini Date 22/03/2018 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where correction services have been used the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed Sofia Bianchi Mancini Date 22/03/2018 STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed Sofia Bianchi Mancini Date 22/03/2018 STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for deposit in the University’s digital repository. Signed Sofia Bianchi Mancini Date 22/03/2018 NB: Students on whose behalf a bar on access has been approved by the University, should use the following version of Statement 2: I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access approved by the University.
    [Show full text]
  • Envy, Poison, and Death
    ENVY, POISON, AND DEATH At the heart of this volume are three trials held in Athens in the fourth century BCE. The defendants were all women and in each case the charges involved a combination of ritual activities. Two were condemned to death. Because of the brevity of the ancient sources, and their lack of agreement, the precise charges are unclear, and the reasons for taking these women to court remain mysterious. Envy, Poison, and Death takes the complexity and confusion of the evidence not as a riddle to be solved, but as revealing multiple social dynamics. It explores the changing factors—material, ideological, and psychological—that may have provoked these events. It focuses in particular on the dual role of envy (phthonos) and gossip as processes by which communities identified people and activities that were dangerous, and examines how and why those local, even individual, dynamics may have come to shape official civic decisions during a time of perceived hardship. At first sight so puzzling, these trials reveal a vivid picture of the socio-political environment of Athens during the early-mid fourth century BCE, including responses to changes in women’s status and behaviour, and attitudes to ritual activities within the city. The volume reveals some of the characters, events, and even emotions that would help to shape an emergent concept of magic: it suggests that the boundary of acceptable behaviour was shifting, not only within the legal arena but also through the active involvement of society beyond the courts. Esther Eidinow is Professor of Ancient History at the University of Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • Persuasive Ethopoeia in Dionysius's Lysias Author(S): Kristine S
    Persuasive Ethopoeia in Dionysius's Lysias Author(s): Kristine S. Bruss Source: Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Winter 2013), pp. 34- 57 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the International Society for the History of Rhetoric Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rh.2013.31.1.34 . Accessed: 04/03/2014 17:03 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and International Society for the History of Rhetoric are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.237.46.100 on Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:03:51 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Kristine S. Bruss Persuasive Ethopoeia in Dionysius’s Lysias Abstract: Dionysius of Halicarnassus’s account of ethopoeia at Lysias 8 is often cited as evidence of Lysias’s mastery of character portrayal, but the passage itself has received little in-depth analysis. Asa con- sequence, Dionysius’s meaning has at times been misinterpreted, and some of his insights on characterization have been neglected.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Thomas K. Hubbard Office: Waggener 9 Hours: Tth 12:30-2:00 Telephone: 471-0676 E-Mail: [email protected]
    Prof. Thomas K. Hubbard Office: Waggener 9 Hours: TTh 12:30-2:00 Telephone: 471-0676 E-mail: [email protected] GREEK 324 – ATTIC ORATORS (#33480) The purpose of this course is to introduce third-year Greek students to some of the major types and topics of Athenian oratory in the late fifth- and fourth-centuries BCE. These works constitute a fascinating source for the political history and daily life of the period. We shall also gain a sense of the development of Greek prose style, as well as honing technical skills in grammar and translation. Each student will be expected to translate in class every day. To allow some flexibility for students’ progress, precise assignments will be announced at the end of the preceding class, within the framework of the following schedule of examinations. Aug. 28 Introduction PART ONE. Forensic Oratory: Lysias Sept. 2 Begin Lysias’ Against Simon Sept. 25 Midterm #1 PART TWO. Sophistic Oratory: Antiphon and Gorgias Sept. 30 Begin Antiphon’s Second Tetralogy Oct. 21 Midterm #2 PART THREE. Praise Oratory: Isocrates Oct. 23 Begin Isocrates’ Panegyricus (selections) Nov. 18 Midterm #3 PART FOUR. Political Oratory: Demosthenes Nov. 20 Begin Demosthenes’ First Olynthiac Dec. 13 Final Exam (9AM-noon) The course grade will be based on three midterms and a final exam (20% each), and class participation, including attendance (20%). Absences will be excused only with proper documentation. Scholastic dishonesty in any form, which includes handing in work that is not exclusively one's own, will be punished by failure of the course and a referral to the Dean of Students (see http://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/sjs/scholdis.php).
    [Show full text]