Cleburne County to Better Support Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic

I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

A. The Purpose of this Engineering Report is to evaluate the need for improvements to the Chief Ladiga Trail in Cleburne County to better support pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Estimated costs for recommended upgrades are included herein.

B. This Report will support an application for Recreational Trails Program (RTP) funding.

C. The Scope of the Report will generally include the following:

1. General Information.

2. Need for Project.

3. Proposed Project.

4. Alternatives to Proposed Project.

5. Project Financing.

6. Conclusions and Recommendations.

II. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Location

1. Cleburne County is located in east central Alabama on the border with Georgia.

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1 2. The Chief Ladiga Trail extends through the northern part of Cleburne County. This 8.928-mile section in Cleburne County was built in approximately 2007.

3. See the enclosed Maps in EXHIBIT “B”.

B. Government

1. The County is governed by the Cleburne County Commission.

2. Ryan Robertson currently serves as Chairman.

III. NEED FOR PROJECT

A. There are some improvements needed to the trail to provide greater ADA accessibility and to provide general upgrades along the trail.

B. At the Georgia state line, where the Silver Comet Trail joins the Chief Ladiga Trail, improvements have been made including a pavilion, bike rack, picnic table and trash receptacles.

C. These facilities provide a natural rest point along the trail. However, it lacks restroom facilities. County personnel report that trail users use the nearby woods by either digging and covering or leaving waste visible on the ground

D. This is a health hazard and an eyesore and involves trespassing onto adjacent private property. A proper restroom

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2 facility is needed to serve trail users. This facility should be constructed to meet ADA requirements.

E. The trail is paved throughout Cleburne County and is accessible by wheelchair and hand bikes. However, the pavilion constructed at the state line is not accessible. The ground cover is not a solid surface and it is not properly sloped. This facility should be brought to ADA standards including a paved surface properly sloped.

F. The picnic table at the state line is not ADA accessible. An ADA accessible table should be installed and access provided from the trail.

G. Some safety improvements are required along the trail. There are seven (7) road crossings on the trail. Safety striping and signage have faded over time and needs re-striping and replacement of signs.

H. Mile marker signs along the trail have been damaged from impact by trail users or trees in some instances and these markers require repair or replacement.

I. The trail was constructed on an old railroad bed. In several locations, shallow roots have grown and pushed up the surface of the trail.

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3 J. When the roots push up the asphalt surface, it creates a dangerous hazard for bicycles. County personnel report multiple injuries from the rough surface caused by roots. The County has used a grinder to help level the surface of the trail to improve safety, but this is not a permanent correction and the surface is still rough. The roots need to be permanently cut and the trail surface repaired. Along a section of the trail that is approximately 40% of the total length, there are approximately 15 to 20 locations that show root damage.

K. Base failure is evident in approximately 5 locations. The asphalt shows signs of cracking and the required repair is to dig and replace the base and the asphalt surface.

L. Along portions of the trail, the side ditches are not well drained. Standing water was noted in some areas. This is a hazard to trail users that might wander off of the trail and this is detrimental to the base material in the trail. While the base failures noted above do not appear to be connected to the areas with poor drainage, ultimately it is expected that the base in this area will fail unless corrective actions are taken. Side ditches should be pulled and tail ditches installed to drain water from the trail as required.

M. The trail surface is in need of re-coating due to the age of the trail. Asphalt patched must be made at the required repairs along the trail.

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4 IV. PROPOSED PROJECT

A. An ADA accessible restroom facility will be constructed near the Georgia state line. A pit privy or holding tank facility will be constructed as a cost savings measure and to avoid the need of electrical and water utilities. The County Commission will provide installation of this facility through in-kind services.

B. The existing amenities at the state line will be upgraded to provide ADA accessibility. The area beneath the existing pavilion will be graded and paved. An ADA accessible picnic table will be installed. The County Commission will provide grading beneath the pavilion and installation of the picnic table through in-kind services. The paving will be through a general contractor.

C. Safety improvements will be addressed at each of the road crossings. Striping on the trail and the roadway to provide warnings to both drivers and trail users will be replaced. Worn signage will be replaced. Mile marker signs will be repaired or replaced as required. The County Commission will provide repair and replacement of all signage and mile markers. The paving striping will be through a general contractor.

D. Repairs will be made to the trail where it has been damaged by roots and by failures in the base material. The shoulder area adjacent to the trail will be dug with a trencher or subsoiler to a depth sufficient to cut the roots and stop growth. The damaged

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 5 areas, both by roots and base failure, will be excavated and replaced with an aggregate base. The County Commission will provide this work through in-kind services. Re-paving of the repair locations will be performed by a general contractor.

E. Ditch work will be performed for all areas where drainage is poor and standing water occurs following rainfall events. The County Commission will perform this work through in-kind services.

F. The entire trail will be bladed to clear the shoulder prior to coating of the trail surface and clearing of the right-of-way with a boom mower will be performed as required to allow access by equipment. Also, removal of bollards will be performed to allow access by equipment. The County Commission will provide this work through in-kind services.

G. The trail will then be overcoated with a single layer of a cementitious surface sealer. This coating is being proposed as a cost savings measure as compared to a layer of asphalt. A general contractor will perform all of this work.

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 6 V. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

A. No Action

1. The County could choose to not perform the proposed improvements.

2. The trail would continue to lack the noted ADA accessibility issues and would lack a sanitary restroom option.

3. The noted safety issues would remain and create a hazard to users.

4. Recommendation: No action is not recommended.

B. Alternate Restroom Facilities

1. A conventional restroom facility is a preferred amenity for users of the trail system. These facilities are more inviting and desirable for use by people.

2. However, a conventional restroom that includes electrical service, water service, heaters, separate men’s and women’s facilities and sinks are much more costly to construct and to operate.

3. The area proposed for the trail lacks easy access to utilities and the only land available is the trail right-of-way. Property would have to be purchased to install a disposal system for the wastewater.

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 7 4. Recommendation: It is recommended that a pit privy or restroom with a holding tank without utilities be constructed.

VI. PROJECT FINANCING

A. The estimated construction cost for this project is $302,245.00. The total estimated project cost including construction, engineering, and Grant Administration is $346,835.00. The County will perform its own construction observation services.

B. An itemized Preliminary Cost Estimate is included in EXHIBIT “A”

C. A grant in the amount of $277,468.00 is being requested from the Recreational Trails Program. The remainder of the cost will be matching funds and in-kind work by the Cleburne County Commission.

D. Summary of Funding Sources

1. RTP Grant $ 277,468.00

2. Matching Funds (County) 52,817.00

3. In-Kind Work (County) 16,550.00

4. Total Project Cost $ 346,835.00

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 8 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. The proposed project would greatly enhance the use of the Chief Ladiga Trail by improving access to services for restrooms, improve ADA access and improve safety.

B. This is a worthy project and it is recommended that the County pursue these improvements. However, the project will not be feasible without grant assistance.

C. It is recommended that the County apply for a RTP grant to help fund this project and for the County to provide the matching funds and in-kind services as required.

Ladd Environmental Consultants, Inc. 9 EXHIBIT “A”

PRELIIMINARY COST ESTIMATE

EXHIBIT “A” PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE CHIEF LADIGA TRAIL - ADA AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS CLEBURNE COUNTY COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2021

NO. DESCRIPTION QUAN UNITS UNIT PRICE TOTAL CASH IN-KIND 1 Mobilization (Contractor) 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 2 Restroom Facility (Materials) 1 LS 18,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 3 Restroom Facility (In-Kind) 1 LS 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 4 ADA Accessible Picnic Table (Materials) 1 EA 500.00 500.00 500.00 5 ADA Accessible Picnic Table (In-Kind) 1 EA 250.00 250.00 250.00 Traffic Control Markings, Class 2, Type A 6 1,170 SF 5.50 6,435.00 6,435.00 (Contractor) Traffic Control Legends, Class 2, Type A 7 600 SF 5.50 3,300.00 3,300.00 (Contractor) 8 Aluminum Flat Sign Panels (Materials) 1 LS 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 9 Sign Replacement (In-Kind) 1 LS 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 10 Distance Markers (Materials) 18 EA 150.00 2,700.00 2,700.00 11 Distance Markers (In-Kind) 18 EA 50.00 900.00 900.00 Cut Roots along Trail with Subsoiler or 12 1 LS 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 Trencher (In-Kind) Excavation and Base Replacement for 13 Trail Repair and ADA Surface benearth 1 LS 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 Shelter (In-Kind) Coarse Aggregate for Trail Repair 14 50 CY 10.00 500.00 500.00 (Materials) 15 Grading to Improve Drainage (In-Kind) 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 16 Removal of Existing Bollards (In-Kind) 1 LS 400.00 400.00 400.00 Blade Edges of Trail Prior to Trail Coating 17 with Motor Grader and Clearing of ROW 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 by Boom Mowers (In-Kind) Plant Mix Asphalt for Patching and 18 8 TON 150.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 Beneath Trail Pavilion (Contractor) 19 Cementitious Surface Sealer (Contractor) 1 LS 231,000.00 231,000.00 231,000.00 20 Construction Signs (Contractor) 570 SF 8.00 4,560.00 4,560.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 302,245.00 $ 285,695.00 $ 16,550.00 Engineer Design: 26,770.00 Disposal Permit & ADPH Permit for Restroom 1,300.00 Inspection (By Owner): - Project Administration (EARPDC) (5%): 16,520.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 346,835.00 Grant: 277,468 80.0% Cash: 52,817 15.2% In-Kind: 16,550 4.8% [2021-04] TOTAL 346,835 0%

A-1 EXHIBIT “B” MAPS

PROJECT VICINITY MAP PROJECT KEY MAP

EXHIBIT “B” PROJECT VICINITY MAP ADA AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG CHIEF LADIGA TRAIL IN CLEBURNE COUNTY 2021 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM B-1 (RTP) APPLICATION NORTH

GEORGIA STATE LINE

x x

CALHOUN COUNTY LINE

x ADA AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHIEF LADIGA TRAIL IN CLEBURNE COUNTY CHIEF LADIGA TRAIL CLEBURNE COUNTY COMMISSION ROAD CROSSING 2021 RTP APPLICATION x BRIDGE SCALE: 1 " - 3000' SHEET B-2 1

APPLICATION CHECKLIST Please use this checklist to ensure all required application documents are included prior to submitting to ADECA. Incomplete applications will not be processed.

Letter on entity letterhead signed by the Chief Elected Official 2 Application Cover Sheet (Page 9) 6 Resolution adopted by the legal entity of the applicant authorizing the submission of the application and committing all matching funds required to complete the proposed 4 project A narrative description of the proposed project and responses to each of the 7 application rating criterion (Pages 10-13) Project Cost Estimate (Page 14) 28 Detailed Project Budget with Descriptive Narrative 14-15 Schedule of project activities necessary for project completion to include measurable 16 milestones (18-month period beginning July 2021) Preliminary Site Plan 17 Location/Vicinity Map 18 Verification of SAM.gov Registration 19 Environmental Assessment: Concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 20 Concurrence from the U.S. Wish and Wildlife Service Concurrence from the Alabama Historical Commission 21 Approval to cross a public highway or a public utility right-of-way (if 22 applicable) Water obstruction & encroachment permit (if applicable) N/A Hazardous materials survey if real property is to be acquired with grant funds N/A Environmental Assessment (if applicable) N/A Copy of deed to property, plat, and/or legal description of the property proposed for 23 purchase and/or development

NOTE: If real property is to be acquired with grant funds, the acquisition must comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 170 (The Uniform Act). Implementation regulations for The Uniform Act are found in 49 CFR Part 24. You may not acquire property until after the grant agreement has been executed and consultation with ADECA staff has occurred. Signed statement from landowner expressing support (This is applicable if the applicant and landowner are not the same. A recorded easement allowing trail N/A construction will be required from the landowner before construction begins.) Environmental Screening Form and Environmental Checklist (Pages 17-20) 24 Letters of endorsement, support, and commitment; other documentation of citizen 31 participation

You must include a copy of this completed checklist with your application. Please see the following website for electronic versions of the forms: http://www.adeca.alabama.gov/Divisions/ced/Recreation/Pages/Programs.aspx. 2

CLEBURNE COUNTY COMMISSION

Rvalr RoerR.rsotv Chairman March 2,2021 L,run,t Coss District I Cleburne County Commission 6751 Highway 78 Errilrprr OwsN Heflin, 36264 District 2 AL

TsnRy Hruorux Dear Ms. Edwards. District 3

RocrnHru The Cleburne County Commission, Cleburne County, Alabama, is seeking District 4 funding from ADECA's Recreational Trails Program in the amount of $277,468.A0 (80% of the total project cost) to provide ADA and safety upgrades to the Chief Ladiga Trail facilities in Cleburne County, Alabama. In addition to the trail upgrades, the project will include the construction of a handicapped accessible restroom facility and picnic table. Due to shallow root damage since this section of trail was completed in 2007, the trail surface is now cracking and creating a safety hazard for participants. Additionally, some grading, drainage, and roadway safety improvements will be completed on the existing facilities to provide equal access.

The project will serve senior needs of physical exercise as well as nearby residents and visitors to the trail's annual bicycle races. The total estimated construction cost for the trail and accompanying project items is $302,245.00 with $16,520.00 for administration and$26,170.00 for engineering design and construction review. This brings the total estimated project cost to $346,835.00.

Ex-Officio Cleburne County Commission Cleburne County, Alabama

Enclosures

P.O. Box 908 6751 Hwy 78 . Heflin, AL36264 , P 256.463.3838 F 256.463.7829 3

Cleburne County, Alabama

ADA and Safety Improvement Project of the Chief Ladiga Trail in Cleburne County, AL

Recreational Trails Program

Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs

March 1, 2021

T ALABAM

AS A

R E

C H ERO K EE N

G ETO W A H

I I

O S

CALHO UN

N CLEBURNE I

TA LLA DEGA M L RANDO LPH CLA Y P M L O A COOSA TA LLA PO O SA N C H A M BERS C N T IN EN G M & DEVELOP

Prepared by the East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission 4 5 6

Application Cover Sheet

Applicant’s Name (Organization): Cleburne County Commission, Cleburne County, Alabama

Address: 6751 Highway 78, Heflin, AL

ZIP+4:36264

County: Cleburne

FEI Number: 63-6001464

DUNS Number: 042404900

Project Title: ADA and Safety Improvement Project:Chief Ladiga Trail Cleburne County This project will make upgrades and improvements along the already Project Description: existing Chief Ladiga Trail that will update the current degraded condition of the surface of the trail and provide facilities to improve the safety of the trail users and maintain the natural condition of the rural environment which it crosses.

Park Name, if applicable: No park associated with project

Park (project location) Address: Chief Ladiga Trail. Unincorporated Cleburne County, Along County RD 49

And County RD 70, Borden Springs, Alabama

ZIP+4: 36272

Latitude and Longitude (deg/min/sec): 33.9298, 85.4702

Congressional District (for project location): 3

State Senate District (for project location): 13

State House District (for project location): 39

Applicant Contact Person and Title: Ryan Robertson, Chairman

Phone and Email: 256-310-2625 [email protected]

Grant Administrator or Other Contact, Title, and Organization: Tyler Ferrell, Director of Planning, East Alabama Planning Commission

Phone and Email: 256-237-6741 [email protected] 7

Project Descriptive Narrative

Provide a brief, yet informative, description of the proposed project and address each evaluation criterion on the following pages (provide additional information and documentation as needed to support your response to each evaluation criterion).

Project Information

Name of Project: _ADA and Safety Improvement Project: Chief Ladiga Trail______

Trail Length in Linear Feet (L.F.): 47,139.840000000004 Trail Width: _Approx. 7 ft______

Trail Surface Type: Asphalt______

Application Type: Non-motorized for a Single Use Motorized Non-motorized for Diverse Use Educational

Type of Applicant: City/Town County State Other

Total Estimated Project Cost $ 346,835.00______Grant Amount Requested $ 277,468.00______Total Local Match $ 69,367.00______Cash Match $ 52,817.00______In-Kind Match $ 16,550.00______Donation $ 0.00______

Brief Description of the Project: The Cleburne County Commission submits a proposal to surface the existing 8.928-mile section of the 34-mile Chief Ladiga Trail which crosses the County and connects with the 61.5-mile Silver Comet Trail at the Alabama/Georgia state line. Since its inception as a rail-to-trail project, the Chief Ladiga Trail has been one of the premiere outdoor recreation and wellness destinations in the counties which it crosses. Together the Chief Ladiga and the Silver Comet comprise a 90-mile paved non-motorized travel corridor. However, over time the trail surface has degraded due to natural use and elements. The goal of the proposed project is to increase accessibility to the trail for citizens with disabilities, as well as utilize the linkages as a recreation-based economic development initiative, encouraging increased tourism and recreation funds as tourists flow into the cities and counties to experience the renewed Chief Ladiga Trail. The yearly Cheaha Challenge and Grand Fondo and the Chief Ladiga Cruise bring riders from all over the world to this corner of Alabama to experience its sublime beauty nestled in the foothills. Sadly, over time, the riders have also come to experience something else: injuries as a result of trail surface degradation. This project will seek to increase the safety of these riders by remediating the current conditions of the trail.

Please address each evaluation criterion (100 Total Available Points).

1. Describe the degree to which the project’s scope and feasibility meet the project area’s recreational needs. (Key Consideration: Does the project appear to be 8

feasible and incorporate a good project design with consideration given to the natural and cultural environment in which the project is located and appropriate consideration given to identified needs and project benefits?) 10 Points Available

The Cleburne County portion of the Chief Ladiga Trail is maintained by the Cleburne County Commission. There are improvements needed to the trail to provide greater accessibility to individuals with disabilities and to provide general upgrades along the Cleburne County portion of the Chief Ladiga Trail. At the state line of Alabama and Georgia, where the Chief Ladiga joins the Silver Comet Trail at a natural rest point along the trail. Therefore, this project aligns with the local cultural and natural environment. The facilities have been upgraded including trash receptacles, due to ongoing waste being left behind, bicycle racks, and a pavilion for pedestrian-use. However, the facilities do not include a restroom. County personnel report that the adjacent wooded areas are being damaged by visible waste on the grounds. A restroom facility is to be erected to serve trail users and to mitigate the health hazard and environmental impact of the current situation. This facility will be constructed to meet ADA requirements. The surface of the trail, sits upon an old railroad bed, and it has been degraded over time by shallow roots pushing up the asphalt surface of the trail. This creates a considerable hazard for bicycles; the rough surface has led to injured trail users. These tree roots need to be permanently cut and the trail surface repaired. Along 40% of the total 8.9 mile section, 15 to 20 locations show root damage. Remediating the current conditions of the trail satisfies a considerable need in the area to improve the health of the population and citizens of age or disability. The Cleburne County Commission has the right of way for this location and as such a signed statement by the landlord is not included. The Cleburne County Commission will provide any needed documentation of right-of-way or crossing a highway, if funded.

2. Describe the ways in which the project provides for the greatest number of compatible recreational purposes. (Key Consideration: An important concern is that the project will enhance the quality and quantity of recreational trail opportunities available in the community or region. Points will be given to projects with connectivity to other trails and/or parks, environmental education and preservation, and economic development opportunities.) 10 Points Available

According to American Trails, the Chief Ladiga Trail, and its Georgia companion the Silver Comet, is taken together the 2nd longest paved trail in the United States. The paved surface accommodates populations who are elderly or disabled and therefore enhances the quantity and quality of recreational trail opportunities available in the region. The Chief Ladiga Trail passes through the Talladega National Forest and the nearby Cheaha Mountain: the tallest mountain in Alabama. The trail also serves as an economic engine when the area hosts the annual Cheaha Challenge bicycle race. This race continues to draw thousands to the local area as they lodge, eat, and visit local municipalities and enjoy the recreational opportunities the trail system provides. The proposed project will resurface the existing Chief Ladiga Trail for residents to utilize; the quantity and quality of recreational opportunities will increase.

3. Describe the ways in which the project provides a new, unique, or more effective means for making trail opportunities available to the public. (Key Consideration: 9

This criterion includes projects of national, regional, and local demonstration value. The most important concern is whether the grant recipient is committed to trying an approach that is new at the local level. Additional points are awarded for nationwide applicability and statewide or regional value. The applicant must commit to documenting the results of the demonstration and identify the method to be used in documenting the results.) 10 Points Available

Restoring the surface of the Cleburne County portion of the Chief Ladiga Trail would revitalize a portion of the trail utilized by local residents and visitors to the area for recreative purposes. The new surface and access upgrades for visitors with disabilities in the Cleburne County portion of the trail is a small project. However, this project is a small part of the maintenance and restoration of a key area resource and is a part of something greater than the 8.92 miles of trail. The Chief Ladiga is used by countless pedestrians and those utilizing non-motorized transport for travel each year. As a complete unit, totaling some 90 miles of paved corridor for non-motorized travel when including Georgia’s Silver Comet connection, this is linkage throughout the region, an artery carved out for recreation enthusiasts through beautiful, rugged terrain. This trail system is a multi-state endeavor, and organizations who support this project such as the Northeast Alabama Bicycle Association, have undertaken studies in the past using remotely placed counters to obtain Average Daily Traffic of the project location. In 2020, on average 57 people per day are utilizing the section of trail within the proposed project. This come to over 20,000 visitors per year, according to the Northeast Alabama Bicycle Association’s study. Please see the attached Letter of Support for further information. Future documentation of Average Daily Traffic of this section of the Chief Ladiga Trail could be undertaken by the County, if funded.

4. Describe the ways in which the project facilitates the access and use of trails by persons with disabilities, older citizens, economically disadvantaged, and other special populations or groups. (Key Consideration: Whether the project will expand recreation opportunities for special populations with recreation deficiencies.) 10 Points Available

This project will afford all populations a stable, level surface on which to enjoy the trail and the unique environment of the Talladega National Forest. An Americans with Disabilities Act compliant restroom facility will be constructred near the existing facilities. The existing amenities along the trail will be upgraded to provided ADA accessibility. The area beneath the pavilion will be graded, paved, and a new picnic table with full accessibility installed. This will provide full access to and from the trail and all amenities. Currently, the degraded condition of the surface of the trail is not inviting to all guests. In fact, in a letter of support from the Northeast Alabama Bicycle Association, the author describes several instances were visitors to the trail were injured by shallow roots which have cracked the existing asphalt creating a safety hazard. The proposed project would provide a smooth, safe surface for visitors of all ages and amenities with equal access for all who require it. A new surface for the Chief Ladiga Trail will enhance the wellness opportunities available to citizens and those who venture into the area looking to get outdoors and get healthy from outside the region.

5. Describe the ways in which the project creates opportunities for new 10

partnerships between trail users, private interests, and public agencies within the project area. (Key Consideration: The major concern is that the project is a component of an integrated effort to enhance economic revitalization and community conservation. Points will be given to applicants providing evidence of cooperative efforts with trail user groups and/or multiple public meetings.) 10 Points Available

At a meeting on March 2, 2021, a meeting was held on support of the proposed project. Following the meeting, a resolution was adopted by the Cleburne County Commission in support of the RTP application. This resolution, Resolution 5109, along with the letter of support from one of the major sponsors of events along the trail such as the Cheaha Challenge and Chief Ladiga Cruise Ride, are acts which exemplify a defined partnership between elected officials and citizens. Comments include, “Number one complaint of riders is always trail conditions.” “Numerous accidents during our events, some resulting in ambulance rides to the local emergency room.” The Anniston Runners Club writes in a letter in support of the project, “This section of trail was completed in 2007 and is in need of repair from normal aging and damage from upheaving roots.” The proposed project has many supporters in the community who signed a petition in favor of the project. By funding this project, future partnerships and economic gains among private interests, trail users, and local governments are possible. Please see attached petition.

6. Describe the ways in which the project uses the grant funds to leverage other public or private investments (in the form of services and materials as well as dollars). (Key Consideration: The major concern is whether actual leveraging is assured or the potential for leveraging is good, outside of any funds committed for the initial grant match. Points will be given for applicants committing double the minimum local match or higher. Supporting documentation must be included in the application.) 10 Points Available

The Chief Ladiga Trail is a major economic development resource in this region. From the annual bicycle races, which draw participants from other continents to this small corner of Alabama to challenge themselves on the “toughest ride in the South,” to the individual searching for wellness and wellbeing in nature, each visitor to the Chief Ladiga Trail deserves equal access. Any dollar put forth in the effort to extend the life of the trail is a dollar which travels through the local lodging, convenience stores, restaurants, fuel, and recreation and multiplies as it ripples outward into the wider economy. An investment in recreation leverages good conscience in many ways.

7. Describe the degree of commitment to continue operation and maintenance of the project. Include an operation and maintenance plan detailing the amount of money needed to operate and maintain the trail/facility after project completion and identify who will be responsible for these activities. (Key Consideration: Whether the grant recipient is willing to commit to continue the maintenance and operation of the facilities and whether the applicant provides a realistic operation and maintenance plan/budget. Additional points will be awarded to applicants demonstrating innovative funding measures for trail maintenance.) 10 Points Available

The Cleburne County Commission is committed to continuing the long-term upkeep of 11

this trail. The County will provide installation of ADA-compliant facilities and some land-grading and cutting of roots damaging the base material of the trail. Furthermore, through in-kind services the County Commission will repair and replace all signage and mile markers. The entire 8.92 mile portion of trail shoulder and right-of-way will be prepared for the surface work by the County. Going forward operational expenses other than standard maintenance and upkeep will not be required and ongoing maintenance and upkeep will be undertaken by the County’s existing personnel.

8. The degree to which community involvement is addressed: i.e., (A) Project idea originated with trail users or a community group that has substantial knowledge, and (B) The private sector (including individual citizens, community groups, and/or local business enterprises) has participated in the development of the proposed idea and has made commitments of labor, money, or materials to support project implementation. (Key Consideration: The objective is to determine if the project is responding to citizen-identified needs. The priority of the project to users is evidenced by citizen support for the idea. Points will be awarded to applicants demonstrating that the project concept was originally proposed at the grassroots level and, especially, for extensive citizen or private organization involvement in project development and support in project implementation as well as applicants demonstrating extensive involvement and participation from citizens and interest groups during all phases of application development and commitments beyond. Supporting documentation must be included in the application.) 10 Points Available

During recent competition events on the trail, several competitors have been injured due to the degraded condition of the trail surface in many places. In a letter in support of the proposed project, Tom Nelson of the Northeast Alabama Bicycle Association writes, “tree roots create hazardous bumps and crack which cause cyclists and runners alike to experience accidents.” The numer of injured may increase as the trail corridor becomes an increasingly popular choice of local recreation. These individuals represent organizations of riders, runners, and general recreation enthusiasts who visit the trail with their families.The community support is reflected in a local petition. A petition originating within the community is signed by many supporters to attest to the support for this project. Furthermore, on March 2, 2021, a meeting was held by the Cleburne County Commission to consider the proposed project. At the meeting, the Cleburne County Commission adopted Resolution 5109 in support of moving forward with the RTP application. These acts signify the considerable amount of support in this rural community toward this proposed project.

9. Describe in detail how the trail will be managed. Include discussion on season length, hours of operation, limitations on use, enforcement provisions, and scheduling. 10 Points Available

The nature and purpose of the Chief Ladiga Trail is one that will not require closure for any reason unless specified by local, state, or federal law. It is open in perpetuity to the general public. Future maintenance and upkeep of the Chief Ladiga trail system will be managed by the Cleburne County Commission. Under normal conditions, all trail linkages will be open to the public 24 hours a day, 365 days per year. 12

10. Identify and describe the service area of the project. Approximately how many people do you propose to serve with this project? Identify other trail resources in the service area by trail type (motorized, non-motorized, multi-use), distance, location in relation to the proposed trail, and ownership. (Key Consideration: The RTP was created to address trail needs in the urban and rural areas of the state. In order to assess the need for additional trails it is first necessary to identify the quantity and location of existing resources within the service area. It is also necessary to establish a service area – either population or resource based. For example, a population-based service area could be a neighborhood, school district, or political jurisdiction whereas, a resource-based service area might be defined along a linear greenway, water course, or unique natural/cultural area. However, in both instances, an estimate of the number of beneficiaries should be provided. Please identify how the project service area was determined.) 10 Points Available

The County Commission seeks to serve its population along with the surrounding unincorporated area. Other sections of the non-motorized Chief Ladiga and Silver Comet trail systems navigate rural and urban areas as it winds east to the Georgia state line. The Cleburne County portion of the Chief Ladiga Trail is predominately rural. The Chief Ladiga Trail grew out of the Rail-to-Trails Initiative. The trail follows the path that was once taken by the railroad. A recent survey of the project service area has shown Average Daily Traffic in excess of 50 visitors a day. The total estimated annual visitors could ostensibly be in excess of 20,000 or more. Other non-motorized and multi-use trail resources within Cleburne County and immediate area include the Statewide Community Mural Trail, Talladega National Forest’s Warden Station Horse Camp Trail and Pinhoti Trail, and the Appalachian Highlands Scenic Byway. Please see the attached letters of support and local attraction exhibits for more information.

NOTE: Property acquired with RTP funds must remain open to the public in perpetuity. Should the property cease to be open to the public for trail use, the applicant must repay the RTP 80% of the fair market value of the property at the time of the change in use. If the project is located on an easement or on leased land, the minimum timeframe for the easement or lease is 25 years. The project must remain open for public access for the use for which the RTP funds were intended during that time. For development projects on applicant owned property, the project must remain open for public access for the use for which the RTP funds were intended for a minimum of 25 years. 13

2021 Recreational Trails Program

Total Project Cost: $346,835.00 Funds Requested: .....:,$=2'-'-7-'-7 ,1....:.4-=-68-= ·=0-=-0____ _

Important Note: The maximum grant amount by trail type is $200,000.00 for non-motorized, single-use trails; $400,000.00 for non-motorized, diverse-use trails; $500,000.00 for motorized trails; or $87,489.00 for education projects.

The applicant �.e that the data contained in the application is true and correct; the �Heat�onl as been d ly authorized; and, the applicant understands that incorrect or 1ncompl.et information ay c use the application to be rejected.

Ex-Officio Chairman (Title) 14 15 WATER WASTEWATER SURVEYING HYDROLOGY PERMITTING HYDRAULICS SITE DESIGN STORMWATER MAPPING/GIS RATE STUDIES NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION RECREATION/PARKS FUNDING ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS

March 1, 2021

Project Narrative for the Cleburne County Recreational Trails Project:

The Trail is an 8.92 section of the Chief Ladiga Trail as it passes through northern Cleburne County. The existing section was completed in 2007 and has degraded from natural use and age. Existing facilities are not adequately accessible to visitors with disabilities and older citizens. This project will remediate this problem and provide equal access to all trail participants. The base will be repaired as required including where shallow roots have damaged the surface and a plant mix asphalt patch installed. A cementitious surface sealer will be installed over the entire trail length in the project area. A handicap accessible restroom and picnic table will also be added to the existing facilities.

LADD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.

James Payton, PE Project Engineer

LADD ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. P.O. BOX 680869 – FORT PAYNE, ALABAMA 35968-1609 • 1207 CHITWOOD AVE. S.E. – FORT PAYNE, ALABAMA 35967-4822 PHONE 256-845-5315 • FAX 256-845-5383 • www.laddenv.com • [email protected] 16

Project Timeline

EARPDC: Zack Shields Application Deadline Contractor/County Project Start County/EARPDC Construction Phase ADECA Bid Tabulation and Award of Potential Award Letter Contract LADD Environmental Contractor/County Analysis Construction Phase Project End: Close Out

Line chart that plots each milestone on the corresponding timeframe is in this cell.

LADD Environmental Preliminary Engineering Report EARPDC: Zack Shields Cleburne Co. Commission Contractor/County Concurrence Deadline Advertise for Bids Construction Phase County/EARPDC Contractor Notice to Proceed 17 18

PROJECT VICINITY MAP ADA AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG CHIEF LADIGA TRAIL IN CLEBURNE COUNTY 2021 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP) APPLICATION 19 20

CHEROKEE ETOWAH EAST ALABAMA

CALHOUN

CLEBURNE REGIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

TALLADEGA M CLAY RANDOLPH COMMISSION

COOSA TALLAPOOSA CHAMBERS 1130 Quintard Avenue Suite 300, Quintard Tower P.O. Box 2186 Anniston, Alabama 36202 Phone: 256-237-6741 FAX: 256-237-6763 E-mail: [email protected] web site: www.earpdc.org Lori Hodge Corley Executive Director

March 1, 2021

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Chief, Regulatory Branch P. O. Box 2288 Mobile, AL 36628-0001

RE: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concurrence – Cleburne County Commission, Cleburne County, AL, RTP Project

Dear Chief,

The Cleburne County Commission proposes to upgrade and improve an urban trail within the unincorporated area of Cleburne County. We request your concurrence.

To obtain Federal funding, coordination with and concurrence from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers is essential. If we have not received your comments within 30 days of the date of this letter, we will assume that you have no comment and concur with the project.

If you should have any questions concerning this matter or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (256) 237-6741. I can also be reached via email at [email protected] or by fax at 256-237-6763.

Thank you,

Tyler Ferrell Planning Director

Chair Vice-Chair Secretary Treasurer WILLIAM “BILL” BAKER LEW WATSON DONNA McKAY RICHARD DEAN A Mayor, City of Piedmont Mayor, Town of Wadley Probate Judge, Coosa County Mayor, City of Lincoln AA Area A Agency On C Calhoun Chambers Cherokee Clay Cleburne Coosa Etowah Randolph Talladega Tallapoosa Aging 21

CHEROKEE ETOWAH EAST ALABAMA

CALHOUN

CLEBURNE REGIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

TALLADEGA M CLAY RANDOLPH COMMISSION

March 1, 2021

Lee Anne Wofford, Deputy SHPO Alabama Historical Commission 468 South Perry Street Montgomery, AL 36130-0900

RE: Alabama Historical Commission concurrence – City of Heflin, Cleburne County, AL

Dear Ms. Wofford,

The Cleburne County Commission proposes to upgrade and improve an urban trail within the unincorporated area of Cleburne County with a Recreational Trails Program grant, if funded. We request your concurrence.

To obtain Federal funding, coordination with and concurrence from the Alabama Historical Commission is essential. If we have not received your comments within 30 days of the date of this letter, we will assume that you have no comment and concur with the project.

Thank you,

Tyler Ferrell Planning Director

CHEROKEE ETOWAH EAST ALABAMA

CALHOUN

CLEBURNE REGIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

TALLADEGA M CLAY RANDOLPH COMMISSION

March 1, 2021

Mr. Bill Pearson, Field Supervisor US Fish and Wildlife Service 1208-B Main Street Daphne, AL 36526-4419

RE: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurrence – Cleburne County Commission, Cleburne County, AL, RTP Project

Dear Mr. Pearson,

The Cleburne County Commission proposes to upgrade and improve an urban trail within the unincorporated area of Cleburne County with a Recreational Trails Program grant, if funded.

To obtain Federal funding, coordination with and concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is essential. If we have not received your comments within 30 days of the date of this letter, we will assume that you have no comment and concur with the project.

Thank you,

Tyler Ferrell Planning Director

Indicate potential for adverse impacts. No Impacts Impacts More Data Needed A. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES or Not Negligible Minor Exceed Minor to Determine Applicable Impacts Impacts EA/EIS required EA/EIS required 1. Geological resources: soils, X bedrock, slopes, streambeds, landforms, etc. 2. Air quality X 3. Sound (noise impacts) X 4. Water quality/quantity X 5. Stream flow characteristics X 6. Marine/estuarine X 7. Floodplains/wetlands X 8. Land use/ownership patterns; X property values; community livability 9. Circulation, transportation X 10. Plant/animal/fish species of X special concern and habitat; state/ federal listed or proposed for listing 11. Unique ecosystems, such as X biosphere reserves, World Heritage sites, old growth forests, etc. 12. Unique or important wildlife/ X wildlife habitat 13. Unique or important fish/habitat X 14. Introduce or promote invasive X species (plant or animal) 15. Recreation resources, including X parks, open space, conservation areas, rec. trails, facilities, services, opportunities, public access, etc.) 16. Accessibility for populations X with disabilities 17. Overall aesthetics, special X characteristics/features 18. Historical/cultural resources, X including landscapes, ethnographic, archeological, structures, etc. 19. Socioeconomics, including X employment, occupation, income changes, tax base, infrastructure 20. Minority and low-income X populations 21. Energy resources (geothermal, X fossil fuels, etc.) 22. Other agency or tribal land use X plans or policies 23. Land/structures with history of X contamination/hazardous materials even if remediated 24. Other important environmental X resources that should be addressed 25

B. MANDATORY CRITERIA To be If your proposal is approved, would it… Yes No determined 1. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? X 2. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic X characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands, wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands; wetlands (E.O. 11990); floodplains (E.O 11988); and other ecologically significant or critical areas? 3. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts X concerning alternative uses of available resources [NEPA section 102(2)(E)]? 4. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or X involve unique or unknown environmental risks? 5. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about X future actions with potentially significant environmental effects? 6. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but X cumulatively significant, environmental effects? 7. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the X National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office? (Attach SHPO/THPO Comments) 8. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List X of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species? 9. Violate a federal law, or a state, local, or tribal law or requirement imposed for X the protection of the environment? 10. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority X populations (Executive Order 12898)? 11. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by X Indian religious practitioners or significantly adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (Executive Order 13007)? 12. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious X weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area, or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

C. CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA 13. Is the area previously disturbed and unlikely to result in any excavation X beyond surface disturbance possibly impacting archaeology? 14. Is the area regularly mowed and therefore unlikely to contain X endangered species? 15. Is there any surface water within direct proximity to the project which X would require protection from construction impacts? 26

2021 Recrcational Trails Program Page 23

Environmental Chechlist fqr Becrqational Trail,s Prooram Proiect c Cleburne

Project Location : Alono Countv RD 70 and Countv RD 90 Cleburne Countv

Project Sponsor/Applicant: Cleburne Countv Commlssion _ Project Description

Concurrence from Alabama Historical Gommission attached? Yes X No Goncurrence from U.$. Fish and Wildlife Services attached? YesV No Concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineerc attached? YesX No Tribal Consultation attached? Yes No( Was the oropertv acquired before Januarv 1992? Yes Nor( lf "No" explain property acquisition proces$ (Uue additional sheeB if necessary):

Note: lf you have not received the concurrence letters by the application deadline, submit copies of the request letters. Concunences over three (3) years old cannot be used and new concunences must be obtained.

Required Letters of Concunence and Release of Conditions

U-S Army Corqs gf Enqineqrs

Mobile District Corps of Engineers Nashville District Corps of Engineers Chief, Requlatory Branch Western Regulatrory Field Office Post Office Box 2288 2424 Danville Road, SW, STE N Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001 Decatur, Alabama 35603 Phone: 251 -690-2658 Phone Nurnber: 256-350-5620

Alab3ma Histgrisa.lCqryrmigsiorl: Lee Anne Wofford, Deputy SHPO, Alabama Historical Commission, 468 South Perry Street, Montgomery, Alabama 36130-0900, Phone: 334-242- 3184.

US Fish and Wildlife Service: Mr. Bill Pearson, Field Supervisor, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1 208-8 Main Street, Daphne, Alabama 36526-4419, 251 -441-51 81 . 27

2021 Recreational Trails Program

I Environmental Reviewers The followingindividual(s) provided input in the completion of the environmental screening form. List all reviewers including name, title, agency, and field of expertise. Keep all environmental review records and data on this proposal in state compliance file forany future program review and/or audit. There mu t be at least o e person listed here. 1.

2. ------

3. ------

The following individuals conducted a site inspection to verify field conditions. List name of inspector(s), title, agency, and date(s) of inspection. There must be at least one person listed here. '1,7 /

1�!!'2d'; {1ct,,.ort E"Nr'IZ/./ a?( e,,Iu/2"-'I C ,e (:, e,,,,,,....,I-ill?:.

2. ------

3. ------28

March 2, 2021

(Date)

Project Cost Estimate

The Recreational Trails Program provides 80/20 matching fund grants. That is, the RTP will fund up to 80 percent of the project cost and the grant recipient must provide at least 20 percent in the form of cash, in-kind, and/or donated contributions.

Eligible Costs

1. Design, engineering, construction oversight services (may not exceed 10% of the total construction cost) 2. Direct labor 3. Special tradesmen secured under a service purchase contract 4. Rental of equipment 5. Construction contracts 6. Project materials 7. Signage1 8. Land acquisition

1 Signs which function as traffic control devices must conform with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Part IX of the MUTCD, Traffic Controls for Bicycle Facilities, covers the bicycle related signs, pavement markings, and signals which may be used on highways or bikeways. Part IX is applicable to shared use paths (nonmotorized multiple-use trails which may provide a transportation purpose). The publication Standard Highway Signs has the detailed drawings for the highway signs prescribed in the MUTCD. These documents are available for purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

Signs which do not function as traffic control devices are not subject to the MUTCD. However, informational signs and kiosks must take into consideration the needs of various users, such as: people who are blind or who have low vision, people who use wheelchairs, and children. 29

9. Professional project administration (grant consultant) (may not exceed 5% of total project cost)

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET BUDGET ITEM TOTAL RTP SHARE MATCHING SHARE Acquisition Construction Contracts $302,245.00 $241,796.00 $60,449.00 Equipment Rental Labor Signage Supplies/Materials Administration $16,520.00 $13,216.00 $3,304.00 Engineering $26,770.00 $21,416.00 $5,354.00

TOTAL PROJECT COST $346,835.00 $277,468.00 $69,367.00

Environmental Screening Form (ESF)

This is a working tool for planners and decision-makers to use to identify the degree of potential impacts to resources that may occur as a result of federal approval of the proposal. It also serves as the administrative record documenting the applicant’s efforts to identify and consider impacts during proposal development. Your ESF responses may change as the planning process refines the proposal that will ultimately be submitted along with the final completed ESF for federal review and decision.

As early as possible in your planning process, consider how your proposal/project may have direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on the human environment. Early identification of possible environmental resource impacts can be used during proposal development and assist in identifying ways to lessen impacts. Initiating or completing environmental analysis after a decision has been made is contrary to both the spirit and letter of the law of the National Environmental Policy Act.

The ESF should be completed with input from resource experts and in consultation with relevant local, state, tribal, and federal governments, as applicable. The interested and affected public should be notified of the proposal and invited to provide input as well. At a minimum, a site inspection of the affected area must be conducted by individuals who are familiar with the type of affected resources, possess the ability to identify potential resource impacts, and know when to seek additional data when needed.

At the time of proposal submission, the completed ESF should reflect the applicant’s final determination of the extent to which the proposal will impact the list of resources on the form. The results of the completed ESF will assist in the identification of the appropriate NEPA 30 pathway to be followed, i.e., categorical exclusion (CE), environmental assessment (EA), environmental impact statement (EIS). Also, the completed ESF will identify the resource topics and issues that should be presented and analyzed in an EA or an EIS, if required.

The ESF contains two parts that must be completed, Part A. Impacts to Environmental Resources and Part B. Mandatory Criteria.

Part A: For each environmental resource topic, choose an impact estimate level (none, negligible, minor, exceeds minor) that describes the degree of potential negative impact that may occur directly, indirectly and cumulatively as a result of federal approval of your proposal. These impact levels should be used to estimate specific impact levels on each separate resource and must be accompanied with a brief explanation of how the resource might be affected, how the impact level was determined, and why the chosen impact level is appropriate. If an environmental review has already been conducted on your proposal, is still viable, and it includes planned mitigation, explain this for each applicable resource and choose an impact level as mitigated. If the resource does not apply to your proposal, mark NA in the first column. Add any relevant resources (see A24) if not included in the list.

Use a separate sheet to explain all potential adverse impacts (negligible, minor, and those exceeding minor) as well as to indicate the type of data that still needs to be determined for each of the applicable resources listed below. Describe direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts as well as any planned mitigation already addressed in previous environmental reviews.

Part B: This is a list of mandatory impact criteria that preclude the use of categorical exclusions. If you answer “yes” or “maybe” for any of the mandatory criteria, you must develop an EA or EIS regardless of your answers in Part A. Explain all “yes” and “maybe” answers on a separate sheet. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105