DOCSLIB.ORG

Lemon Creek Watershed Recovery and Management Plan July 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lemon Creek Watershed Recovery and Management Plan July 2007 Lemon Creek Watershed Recovery and Management Plan July 2007 Lemon Creek Management and Recovery Plan July 2007 Statement of Purpose and Need As Juneau grows, the expansion of commercial and residential development requires careful planning and consideration to limit the impact of this growth on human and ecosystem health and safety. Current and proposed gravel extraction, construction of medium-density housing, and influx of commercial “box stores” in the Lemon Creek Valley create an urgent need to define an up-to-date management and recovery plan for Lemon Creek. The Lemon, Switzer, and Vanderbilt areas are a primary source of gravel in Juneau; as such, gravel extraction has driven the degradation of in-stream and riparian fish habitat in these areas over the last four decades. Rapid urban growth beginning in the early 1970’s resulted in a residential and commercial corridor along the lower reaches of Lemon Creek that constricts its naturally meandering flowpath. Extreme erosion upstream of the urban corridor has resulted in streambed aggradation and increased flood risk. Much of the Lemon Creek Watershed remains undeveloped; the creek and its watershed are appraised for recreational and educational public use and aquatic and terrestrial habitat. As Lemon and Ptarmigan Glaciers retreat, water quality impairment due to glacial activity is expected to improve significantly in the future. The challenge ahead is to minimize the impact of gravel extraction, necessary flood mitigation, and future development upon existing and potential uses dependent upon aquatic and riparian habitat. Lemon Creek is currently listed as impaired for sediment, turbidity, and habitat modification on the Alaska Clean Water Action (ACWA) 4b list. Water quality monitoring and biological studies designed to determine the extent of these impairments are largely lacking, and no baseline water quality or biologic data collected prior to gravel extraction are known to exist. The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation developed a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) report for Lemon Creek, published in 1995, based on limited data. The TMDL report identified several sources or potential sources of sediment and turbidity in the Lemon Creek watershed, outlined a monitoring strategy for collecting water quality data, listed several recovery actions, and defined sediment allocations for key land users in the area. The purpose of this report is to evaluate actions taken and information collected in the Lemon Creek area since the publication of the 1995 TMDL and apply this information to update the Lemon Creek recovery and management plan. An updated plan will assist local agencies, watershed groups, citizens, and land users to coordinate energy and resources as effectively as possible for the protection and improvement of water quality and fish habitat while providing relief from flood risk and supporting ongoing gravel extraction and development. The intended audience of this report includes citizens and agencies. -2- Lemon Creek Management and Recovery Plan July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................4 1.1 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................4 1.2 GEOLOGY , FLORA AND FAUNA ........................................................................................................................10 1.3 HISTORY ...........................................................................................................................................................12 2. WATER QUALITY ..............................................................................................................................................14 2.1 WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS .....................................................................................................................14 2.2 LEMON CREEK WATER QUALITY ...................................................................................................................14 2.2.1 TMDL Loading Capacity Estimates ......................................................................................................15 2.2.2 Total Load Allocations ............................................................................................................................16 2.3 RELEVANT WATER QUALITY DATA ................................................................................................................19 Discharge and Solids Data ...............................................................................................................................19 Other Data ........................................................................................................................................................19 2.4 DESIGNATED USE IMPAIRMENTS .....................................................................................................................20 2.4.1 Sediment ...................................................................................................................................................20 2.4.2 Turbidity ..................................................................................................................................................21 2.4.3 Habitat Modification ...............................................................................................................................22 2.4.4 Other Pollutants of Concern ..................................................................................................................22 3. FISH AND FISH HABITAT.................................................................................................................................23 3.1 LEMON CREEK FISH SPECIES ..........................................................................................................................23 3.2 FISHERIES RESEARCH ......................................................................................................................................25 3.3 FISH HABITAT IMPACTS ...................................................................................................................................26 3.3.1 Erosion .....................................................................................................................................................27 3.3.2 Channel Alterations ................................................................................................................................27 3.3.3 Streambank and Riparian Disturbance ................................................................................................27 4. RECOVERY AND STEWARDSHIP ..................................................................................................................29 4.1 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................................................29 4.1.1 Urbanization and Land Use ...................................................................................................................30 4.1.2 Riparian Buffers ......................................................................................................................................36 4.1.3 Other Potential Pollutants ......................................................................................................................36 4.1.4 Fish Habitat .............................................................................................................................................37 4.1.5 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................................38 4.2 GOALS AND ACTION ITEMS ..............................................................................................................................39 APPENDIX A: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................48 APPENDIX B: LEMON CREEK CHANNEL TYPES AND PROCESS GROUPS ...........................................48 APPENDIX C: LEMON CREEK AREA ZONING MAPS (CBJ, 2006)..............................................................52 APPENDIX D: 1995 LEMON CREEK IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.................................................................60 -3- Lemon Creek Management and Recovery Plan July 2007 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Watershed Description Lemon Creek is a medium-sized glacially-fed stream located in the Lemon Creek Valley, approximately five miles northwest of downtown Juneau, Alaska (Figure 1). Flowing east to west from the terminal lakes of the Thomas and Lemon Glaciers and emptying into Gastineau Channel, Lemon Creek courses through Tongass National Forest lands to a growing residential and industrial urban area. Elevations range from sea level to 5,600 feet (USGS); Lemon Creek is steeply bordered to the north by Heintzleman Ridge, to the south by Blackerby Ridge, and to the east by Lemon Creek Glacier and the Juneau Icefield. Thoma Alask s a ¹ Glacier Legend Lemon Creek Watershed Lemon Creek Trail Roads Lemon Creek Lemon Glacie r Canyo Ptarmigan No n Creek Glacier Sawmil Name Creek Mendenhall l Valley, Creek ~2 miles Lemo n Creek 00.5 1 2 3 4 Trail Kilometers Downtown Juneau, ~5 miles Figure 1: Lemon Creek Watershed, Juneau,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letter 2 (PDF)
    SARAH PALIN, GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 Post Office Box 111800 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER Phone: 907-465-5066 Fax: 907-465-5070 www.dec.state.ak.us October 20, 2008 Elin Miller, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Mail Code: RA-140 Seattle, WA 98101-3140 Dear Ms. Miller: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has reviewed your th August 18 letter regarding EPA’s PM2.5 designations for Alaska and the nonattainment boundaries for the communities of Fairbanks and Juneau. We have carefully considered the available data and analyses. ADEC believes the available scientific evidence does not support EPA’s boundary recommendations which substantially expand upon those recommended by us. ADEC believes public health will be protected and the applicable legal requirements met by taking the actions described in this letter, which include a proposed nonattainment boundary for the Fairbanks area that is larger than originally proposed by ADEC, but smaller than proposed by EPA. For Juneau, we are requesting EPA revisit certain assumptions and include data from 2008 before making a final decision on whether a nonattainment designation is warranted, and if so, the appropriate boundaries of the nonattainment area. Protecting public health is a goal we share with EPA. As you are already aware, we are proactively and expeditiously working with the local governments to address identified PM2.5 concerns in Fairbanks and Juneau. To this end, ADEC does not believe EPA’s proposed boundaries will ultimately assist in protecting public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Flightseeing Noise Study and Mitigation Option Analysis, RFP 00
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Summary………………………………………………………………………………..………...1 1.0 Methodology …………………………………………………………………………….7 1.1 Criteria……………………………………………………………………………..….7 1.1.1 Exclusion Criteria………………………………………………………….. 7 1.1.2 Rating Criteria …………………...…….………………………………….7 1.1.3 Summary Rating Table ……………………………………………………10 1.2 Companies and Flight Lines ………..………………………………...….……..11 TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc. ……………………..……………………………..11 Coastal Helicopters, Inc …………………………………………………...13 ERA Helicopters, Inc …………………………………………………………...14 North Star Trekking, LLC …………………………………………………...14 1.3 Noise Corridors …………………………………………………………………...20 1.4 Sound Modeling and Monitoring …………………………………………………...24 1.4.1 Background …………………………………………………………...24 1.4.2 Noise Measurement Survey Methodology …………………………...24 Measurement Procedures …………………………………………...28 Instrumentation …………………………………………………...28 Measurement and Analysis Procedures …………………………...29 1.4.3 Computer Modeling ………………………………………………….. 29 2.0 Heliport Management And Facility Requirements …………………………………...30 2.1 Heliport Management………………………………………………..30 2.1.1 Capital Funding …………………………………………………...31 2.2 Facility Requirements …………………………………………...32 3.0 Flight Safety …………………………………………………………………………...36 3.1 Airspace And Air Traffic Control …………………………………………………...36 3.1.1Weather Conditions …………………………………………………...38 3.1.2 Flight Rules …………………………………………………………...39 3.2 FAR Part 77…………………………………………………………………………………44 4.0 Alternate Heliport Sites …………………………………………………………………...46 4.1 Recommended Sites …………………………………………………………...46 4.1.1Dupont
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 01/10/2021 05:39:21
    What I'm Waiting For Item Type Thesis Authors Simpson, Sheryl Ann Download date 01/10/2021 05:39:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/8521 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. H ie qualityof this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, prim bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolly Varden Sport Fishery-Juneau Area
    Volume 12 Job No. R-IV-C STATE OF ALASKA William A. Egan" Governor Annual Progress Report for DOLLY VARDEN SPORT FISHERY ­ JUNEAU AREA by Richard D. Reed and Robert H. Armstrong DIVISION OF SPORT FISH Rupert E. Andrews" Director Howard E. Metsker" Coordinator AJaskaResources Library & Information Services Anchorahff' Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. RECOMMENDATIONS 0 0 2 OBJECTIVES 0 • 0 0 • 4 INTRODUCTION • • 0 • 0 4 TECHNIQUES USED 0 e 0 0 0 0 • 0 5 FINDINGS 0 • 0 0 8 WATERSHED SURVEYS LAKES: Auke 0 10 Cropley 0 •• 0 0 0 ••• • 0 0 0 0 0 16 Dredge • 0 0 0 17 Glacier and Moraine 0 0 0 26 Louie 0 0 0 0 43 Marshall Ponds 0 0 • 44 Mendenhall 0 44 Norton 0 0 0 0 56 Peterson 0 0 0 • 0 0 59 QT 0 0 • 64 Salmon Creek Reservoir 0 0 0 0 67 Windfall 0 0 0 • 0 0 82 STREAMS : Auke Creek 0 8 Auke Nu Creek 0 0 0 12 Bay Creek 0 • 0 •• 0 0 0 14 Bear Creek 0 0 • 0 15 Cove Creek 0 • 0 0 15 Cross Bay Creek 0 0 16 Duck Creek • 18 Eagle Creek 0 • •• 0 19 Eagle River 0 0 20 Elevenmile Creek 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 22 0 0 23 Falls Creek 0 0 0 0 • 0 Fish Creek 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Gold Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Grant Creek 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Hendrickson Creek 0 0 0 30 Herbert River • 0 0 0 31 Johnson Creek 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 32 Jordan Creek 0 0 • 0 0 34 i Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Live Here? Contents in Early 2013, Goldbelt Heritage Foundation Journal-Style Retrospective Comple- Why Do We Live Here?
    Investigating Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Áak’w and T’aakú Aaní Richard Carstensen Discovery Southeast for Goldbelt Heritage Foundation & UAS School of Education A high school course Feb—May, 2013 update, 2020 Why do we live here? Contents In early 2013, Goldbelt Heritage Foundation journal-style retrospective comple- Why do we live here? ......................................... 3 Preface (GHF), asked if I was interested in a class on Investigat- ments her outlines and materials A windy walk ..................................................................3 ing Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) for Juneau with some highlights of one of Kaxdigoowu Héen historical series ...........................5 the most memorable educational Gunalchéesh! ................................................................6 high school students. I fondly remembered the GHF Evolution of the TEK class ............................................6 summer academy in 2010, and our course manual What endeavors of my career. Part 1 ● Investigating TEK ............................. 6 would Raven see? (http://www.goldbeltheritage.org/). Etymology of " village" .................................................7 One of our longer-term goals in 2010 had been to extend Preface 2020 With luxury The hunt for t’óok’ .........................................................7 those learning opportunities—piloted in summer immer- of hindsight, one of the more Framing the question: needs and setting ....................13 sion courses—to the rest of the school
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Glacier Tours : Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    United States Department of Agriculture HELICOPTER Forest Service GLACIER TOURS Alaska Region R10-MB-271 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Alaska Region Tongass National Forest Chatham Area Juneau Ranger District Photograph Copyright O M.Kelley, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY Chapter 1 - PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION 1 A. Introduction 1 Background: 1984 1 Background: 1987 1 Background: 1989 2 Background: 1992 2 1 . Altitudes 2 2. Montana Creek/Mendenhall Departure 2 3. Lemon Creek Departure 2 Background: 1993 2 Background: 1994 3 B. Purpose and Need 3 C. Proposed Action 3 Temsco 3 Coastal 4 ERA 4 D. Decision to be Made 4 E. Scoping 4 F. Significant Issues 5 G. Existing Management Direction 5 H. Other Laws and Permits 6 Federal Aviation Administration 6 City and Borough of Juneau 7 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 7 Alaska Department of Fish & Game 7 Chapter 2 - ALTERNATIVES 1 A. Introduction - 1 B. Alternative A - No Action 1 C. Alternative B - Proposed Action 1 Table 2-1 - Maximum Number of Landings by Glacier (Temsco) 2 Table 2-2 - Maximum Number of Landings by Glacier (Coastal) 2 Table 2-3 - Maximum Number of Landings by Glacier (ERA) 3 Table 2-4 - Total Number of Landings by Company 3 D. Alternative C - Authorize Current Level of Landings Through 1999 3 Table 2-5 - Maximum Number of Landings by Glacier (Temsco) 4 Table 2-6 - Maximum Number of Landings by Glacier (Coastal) 4 Table 2-7 - Maximum Number of Landings by Glacier (ERA) 5 Table 2-8 - Maximum Number of Landings by Company 5 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Legend Leader: Prof
    CREVASSE HAZARD MAP AT THE JUNEAU ICEFIELD 134°40'0"W 134°30'0"W 134°20'0"W 134°10'0"W 134°0'0"W 133°50'0"W 133°40'0"W Mount Canning Mount Pullen 59°10'0"N 59°10'0"N Mount Hislop Mount Poletca Mount Service Mount London 59°0'0"N 59°0'0"N Field Glacier Boundary Peak 99 Mount Nesselrode Mount Bressler Boundary Peak 96 Bucher Glacier Mount Ogilvie Gale Peak Antler Glacier Blizzard Peak 58°50'0"N 58°50'0"N Vaughan Lewis Glacier Mammary Peak Elephant Promontory Gilkey Glacier Mount Moore Mount Blachnitzky Picket Gate Crags Avalanche Canyon The Citadel Gisel Peak Spirit Range Dipyramid The Wall Bacon Creek Echo Glacier Mathes Gl aci er Amalga (historical) Centurian Peak Unknown Glacier Devils Paw Batle Gl aci er Berners Peaks Couloir Peak The Tusk Thiel GlacierHorn Spire Glacier King Echo Mountain Icefall SpiresCamp 15 Peak Exploraton Peak Demorest Glacier Mount Adolph Knopf Ivy Ridge Floprock Peak The Horn Peaks 58°40'0"N 58°40'0"N Tricouni Peak West Branch Taku Glacier Knowl Hades Highway Vantage Peak Dike Mountain Carpet Peak Bacon Glacier Snowpatch Crag Nunatak Chalet Mustang Peak Icy BasinWashington Basin Antler Peaks Eagle Glacier The Snow Towers Litle Ma aerhor n Folded TowersJuneau Icefiel d Cathedral Peak Organ Pipes Camp 4 Peak Juncture Peak Twin Glacier Peak Taku Towers Boundary Lake Taku Glacier Hodgkins Peak Taku Range East Twin Glacier Boundary Creek Snowdrif Peak West Twin Glacier Triangle Peak The Dukes Kluchman Mountain Mount Ernest GrueningHerbert Glacier Sitakanay Ri ver Rhino PeakPrincess Peak Columbia Basin (not official)
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Trails
    Recreation Opportunity Guide Juneau Trails Tongass National Forest Juneau Ranger District Juneau Trails Recreation Opportunity Guide Tongass National Forest Juneau Ranger District Published by the Alaska Natural History Association in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service, with appreciation to the Gastineau Channel Centennial Association (1963 - 1984). 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS* Trail Users Guide for Southeastern Alaska 2 Area Maps (in three sections) 6 Amalga (Eagle Glacier) Trail (NA) ID Auke Nu Trail (NA) 12 Bessie Creek Trail (NA) 14 Blackerby Ridge Route ( DJ ) 16 Dan Moller Trail (DI) 18 East Glacier Loop Trail (MG) 20 Granite Creek Trail (DJ) 22 Heinztleman Ridge Route (MG) 24 Herbert Glacier Trail (NA) 2 6 Lemon Creek Trail (DJ) 26 Montana Creek Trail (MG) 30 Mt. Bradley (Mt. Jumbo) Trail (DI) 32 Mt. Juneau Trail (DJ) 34 Mt. McGinnis Route (MG) 36 Mt. Roberts Trail ( DJ ) 38 Nugget Creek Trail (MG) 40 Perseverance Trail (DJ) 42 Peterson Lake Trail (NA) 44 Point Bishop/Dupont Trail ( DJ ) 46 Salmon Creek Trail (DJ) 4d Sheep Creek Trail (DJ) 5U Spaulding Trail (NA) 52 Treadwell Ditch Trail (DI) 54 West Glacier Trail (MG) 5o Windfall Lake Trail (NA) 58 Yankee Basin Trail (NA) 60 * Trails are noted as to location: (DJ) Downtown Juneau Area (MG) Mendenhall Glacier Area (DI) Douglas Island (NA) North of Auke Bay TRAIL USERS GUIDE FOR JUNEAU, ALASKA Many of the hiking trails in Juneau begin at points near the road systems and are within the Tongass National Forest or on public lands maintained by a variety of federal, state, and community agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrologic Characterization of Pelitic Schists in the Western Metamorphic Belt, Coast Plutonic-Metamorphic Complex, Near Juneau
    Petrologic Characterization of Pelitic Schists in the Western Metamorphic Belt, Coast Plutonic-Metamorphic Complex, Near Juneau, Southeastern Alaska AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current­ year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single all of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superin­ • ANCHORAGE, Alaska--4230 University Dr., Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrologic Characterization of Pelitic Schists in the Western Metamorphic Belt, Coast Plutonic-Metamorphic Complex, Near Juneau, Southeastern Alaska
    - Petrologic Characterization of Pelitic Schists in the Western Metamorphic Belt, Coast Plutonic-Metamorphic Complex, Near Juneau, Southeastern Alaska By Glen R. Himmelberg, David A. Brew, and Arthur B. Ford U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2074 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by USGS Map Distribution Box 25286 MS306 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Text and illustrations edited by James W. Hendley I1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Himmelberg, Glen R. Petrologic characterization of pelitic schists in the western metamorphic belt, coast plutonic-metamor- phic complex, near Juneau, southeastern Alaska 1 by Glen R. Himmelberg, David A. Brew, and Arthur B. Ford. p. cm. - (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2074) Includes bibliographical references. 1. Schists-Alaska-Juneau Region. 2. Geology-Alaska-Juneau Region. I. Brew, David A. 11. Ford, Arthur B. (Arthur Barnes), 1932- 111. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2074 [QE475.S3] 557.3 S-dc20 94-293 [552'.4] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 1 I I Cellulose Decomposition in Southeast Alaskan Forests
    1 i I 1242 NOTES Cellulose decomposition in southeast Alaskan forests: effects of pit and mound microrelief and burial depth MICHAEL H. MCCLELLAN USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Juneau, AK 99802, U.S.A. BERNARD T. BORMANN USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. AND KERMIT CROMACK, JR. Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. Received October 30, 1989 Accepted February 19, 1990 MCCLELLAN, M. H., BORMANN, B. T., and CROMACK, K., JR. 1990. Cellulose decomposition in southeast Alaskan forests: effects of pit and mound microrelief and burial depth. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 1242-1246. In southeast Alaska, where wildfires are rare, uprooting is the predominant disturbance influencing stand develop- ment in Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg. - Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. forests. We compared I -year decomposition of confined cellulose filter paper placed in the organic horizon and at the organic-mineral interface on both tree-throw mounds and adjacent pits. Decomposition rates were not significantly different between pits and mounds, but filter papers within the organic layer lost 33.7% of their original dry mass, and packs within the mineral layer lost 14.5% of their mass. This effect was highly significant (p < 0.01). We concluded that the greater organic accumulations observed in pits are largely due to litter redistribution. MCCLELLAN, M. H., BORMANN, B. T., et CROMACK, K., JR. 1990. Cellulose decomposition in southeast Alaskan forests: effects of pit and mound microrelief and burial depth. Can. J. For. Res. 20 :1242-1246. Dans le sud-est de (Alaska ou les feux de for sont rares, le chablis est la principale perturbation qui influence le developpement des peuplements de Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.
    [Show full text]
  • Rain, Rain and More Rain
    4/12/2016 All About Juneau's Rain Rain, Rain and More Rain by Robert Kanan, WCM (RET), Weather Forecast Office, Juneau, AK A record precipitation total of 85.06 inches was observed at Juneau International Airport during l991. However, the airport is located at one of the driest places in the greater Juneau area. So, how wet was the rest of Juneau? To answer that question, it is necessary to take a brief look at what causes rain in our mid­latitude rain forest. The most important prerequisite is availability of moisture. The Gulf of Alaska has been called the graveyard of North Pacific storms since so many come to rest in the gulf after a long journey across the Pacific Ocean. These maritime low pressure centers often gather warm moist air from tropical latitudes and carry it along in the prevailing westerly winds. That moisture is then pushed onshore over the rim of the gulf. Except for short periods of cold arctic outflows from Northwest Canada, all of Southeast Alaska has a maritime climate. Overall, there is abundant moisture available. The other prerequisite for rain is a lifting mechanism to raise the moist air to cool it enough to condense into precipitation. Weather fronts associated with these North Pacific lows cause strong upward motion. Our fall and winter storms are a good example of frontal induced rains. Instability, when cold air aloft allows the warmer air below to rise, is another main lifting mechanism. Heavy showers after a front moves through the area and our summer showers, including the very infrequent thundershowers, are the result of that instability.
    [Show full text]