Juneau Trails
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
TOWARDS POSTAL EXCELLENCE the Report of the President's Commission on Postal Organization June 1968
TOWARDS POSTAL EXCELLENCE The Report of The President's Commission on Postal Organization June 1968 \ ... ~ ~ ..;,. - ..~ nu. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.25 2 THE PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON POSTAL ORGANIZATION I ~ FREDERICK R. KAPPEL-Chairman Ii Chairman, Board of Directors (retired) ) American Telephone and Telegraph Company GEORGE P. BAKER Dean Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration DAVIn E. BELL Vice President The Ford Foundation FRED J. BORCH President General Electric Company DAVIn GINSBURG Partner Ginsburg and Feldman RALPH LAZARUS Chairman Board of Directors Federated Department Stores GEORGE MEANY President American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations J. IRWIN MILLER Chairman Board of Directors Cummins Engine Company W. BEVERLY MURPHY President Campbell Soup Company RUDOLPH A. PETERSON President Bank of America MURRAY COMAROW-Executive Director ii THE PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON POSTAL ORGANIZATION 1016 SIXTEENTH STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. President: I have the honor of transmitting the Report of the President's Commission on Postal Organization in compliance with Executive Order 11341 dated April 8, 1967. You asked this Commission to "conduct the most searching and exhaustive review ever undertaken . ." of the American postal service. We have complied with your mandate. You asked us to "determine whether the postal system as presently organized is capable of meeting the demands of our growing economy and our expanding population." We have concluded that it is not. Our basic finding is that the procedures for administering the ordinary executive departments of Government are inappropriate for the Post Office. -
Trapping Regulations You May Trap Wildlife for Subsistence Uses Only Within the Seasons and Harvest Limits in These Unit Trapping Regulations
Trapping Regulations You may trap wildlife for subsistence uses only within the seasons and harvest limits in these unit trapping regulations. Trapping wildlife out of season or in excess of harvest limits for subsistence uses is illegal and prohibited. However, you may trap unclassified wildlife (such as all squirrel and marmot species) in all units, without harvest limits, from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2016. Subsistence Trapping Restrictions When taking wildlife for subsistence purposes, ● Take (or assist in the taking of) furbearers by firearm trappers may not: before 3:00 a.m. on the day following the day on which airborne travel occurred. This does not apply to a ● Disturb or destroy a den (except any muskrat pushup trapper using a firearm to dispatch furbearers caught in or feeding house that may be disturbed in the course of a trap or snare. trapping). ● Use a net or fish trap (except a blackfish or fyke trap). ● Disturb or destroy any beaver house. ● Use a firearm other than a shotgun, muzzle-loaded ● Take beaver by any means other than a steel trap or rifle, rifle or pistol using center-firing cartridges, for the snare, except certain times of the year when firearms taking of a wolf or wolverine, except that: may be used to take beaver in Units 9, 12, 17, 18, 20E, ■ You may use a firearm that shoots rimfire 21E, 22 and 23. See Unit-specific regulations. cartridges to take wolf and wolverine under a ● Under a trapping license, take a free-ranging furbearer trapping license. You may sell the raw fur or tanned with a firearm on NPS lands. -
Letter 2 (PDF)
SARAH PALIN, GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 Post Office Box 111800 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER Phone: 907-465-5066 Fax: 907-465-5070 www.dec.state.ak.us October 20, 2008 Elin Miller, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Mail Code: RA-140 Seattle, WA 98101-3140 Dear Ms. Miller: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has reviewed your th August 18 letter regarding EPA’s PM2.5 designations for Alaska and the nonattainment boundaries for the communities of Fairbanks and Juneau. We have carefully considered the available data and analyses. ADEC believes the available scientific evidence does not support EPA’s boundary recommendations which substantially expand upon those recommended by us. ADEC believes public health will be protected and the applicable legal requirements met by taking the actions described in this letter, which include a proposed nonattainment boundary for the Fairbanks area that is larger than originally proposed by ADEC, but smaller than proposed by EPA. For Juneau, we are requesting EPA revisit certain assumptions and include data from 2008 before making a final decision on whether a nonattainment designation is warranted, and if so, the appropriate boundaries of the nonattainment area. Protecting public health is a goal we share with EPA. As you are already aware, we are proactively and expeditiously working with the local governments to address identified PM2.5 concerns in Fairbanks and Juneau. To this end, ADEC does not believe EPA’s proposed boundaries will ultimately assist in protecting public health. -
Environmental Assessment Juneau Ranger District Trail of Time
Environmental Assessment Juneau Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Trail of Time, Adjacent Area Trails, Tongass National and Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Forest Alaska Region Center Improvements Project Juneau Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, Alaska February 2010 ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS ACMP Alaska Coastal Management Plan ADF&G Alaska Department of Fish and Game ANILCA Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act BMP Best Management Practice CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act EA Environmental Assessment EFH Essential Fish Habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement Forest Plan Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan FSH Forest Service Handbook FSM Forest Service Manual GIS Geographic Information System LUD Land Use Designation MIS Management Indicator Species NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFS National Forest System USDA United States Department of Agriculture WAA Wildlife Analysis Area The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). -
Alaska Range
Alaska Range Introduction The heavily glacierized Alaska Range consists of a number of adjacent and discrete mountain ranges that extend in an arc more than 750 km long (figs. 1, 381). From east to west, named ranges include the Nutzotin, Mentas- ta, Amphitheater, Clearwater, Tokosha, Kichatna, Teocalli, Tordrillo, Terra Cotta, and Revelation Mountains. This arcuate mountain massif spans the area from the White River, just east of the Canadian Border, to Merrill Pass on the western side of Cook Inlet southwest of Anchorage. Many of the indi- Figure 381.—Index map of vidual ranges support glaciers. The total glacier area of the Alaska Range is the Alaska Range showing 2 approximately 13,900 km (Post and Meier, 1980, p. 45). Its several thousand the glacierized areas. Index glaciers range in size from tiny unnamed cirque glaciers with areas of less map modified from Field than 1 km2 to very large valley glaciers with lengths up to 76 km (Denton (1975a). Figure 382.—Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the Alaska Range in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image mosaic from Mike Fleming, Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska. The numbers 1–5 indicate the seg- ments of the Alaska Range discussed in the text. K406 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD and Field, 1975a, p. 575) and areas of greater than 500 km2. Alaska Range glaciers extend in elevation from above 6,000 m, near the summit of Mount McKinley, to slightly more than 100 m above sea level at Capps and Triumvi- rate Glaciers in the southwestern part of the range. -
Principal Facts of the Earth's Magnetism and Methods Of
• * Class Book « % 9 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U. S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY E. LESTER JONES, Superintendent PRINCIPAL FACTS OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETISM AND METHODS OF DETERMIN¬ ING THE TRUE MERIDIAN AND THE MAGNETIC DECLINATION [Reprinted from United States Magnetic Declination Tables and Isogonic Charts for 1902] [Reprinted from edition of 1914] WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1919 ( COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY OFFICE. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U. S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY »» E. LESTER JONES, Superintendent PRINCIPAL FACTS OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETISM AND METHODS OF DETERMIN¬ ING THE TRUE MERIDIAN AND THE MAGNETIC DECLINATION [Reprinted from United States Magnetic Declination Tables and Isogonic Charts for 1902 ] i [ Reprinted from edition of 1914] WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 4 n; «f B. AUG 29 1913 ft • • * C c J 4 CONTENTS. Page. Preface. 7 Definitions. 9 Principal Facts Relating to the Earth’s Magnetism. Early History of the Compass. Discovery of the Lodestone. n Discovery of Polarity of Lodestone. iz Introduction of the Compass..... 15 Improvement of the Compass by Petrius Peregrinus. 16 Improvement of the Compass by Flavio Gioja. 20 Derivation of the word Compass. 21 Voyages of Discovery. 21 Compass Charts. 21 Birth of the Science of Terrestrial Magnetism. Discovery of the Magnetic Declination at Sea. 22 Discovery of the Magnetic Declination on Land. 25 Early Methods for Determining the Magnetic Declination and the Earliest Values on Land. 26 Discovery of the Magnetic Inclination. 30 The Earth, a Great Magnet. Gilbert’s “ De Magnete ”.'. 34 The Variations of the Earth’s Magnetism. Discovery of Secular Change of Magnetic Declination. 38 Characteristics of the Secular Change. -
Tucson Cactus and Succulent Society Guide to Common Cactus and Succulents of Tucson
Tucson Cactus and Succulent Society Guide to Common Cactus and Succulents of Tucson http://www.tucsoncactus.org/c-s_database/index.html Item ID: 1 Item ID: 2 Family: Cactaceae Family: Cactaceae Genus: Ferocactus Genus: Echinocactus Species: wislizenii Species: grusonii Common Name: Fishhook Barrel Common Name: Golden Barrel Habitat: Various soil types from 1,000 Cactus to 6,000 feet elevation from grasslands Habitat: Located on rolling hills to rocky mountainous areas. and cliffs. Range: Arizona, southwestern New Range: Limited to small areas in Mexico, limited extremes of western Queretaro, Mexico. The popula- Texas, Sonora, northwest Chihuahua tion had become very low in num- and northern Sinaloa, Mexico bers over the years but is just Care: An extremely easy plant to grow now beginning to increase due to in and around the Tucson area. It re- protective laws and the fact that Photo Courtesy of Vonn Watkins quires little attention or special care as this plant is now in mass cultiva- ©1999 it is perfectly at home in almost any tion all over the world. garden setting. It is very tolerant of ex- Photo Courtesy of American Desert Care: The Golden Barrel has slow- Description treme heat as well as cold. Cold hardi- Plants ly become one of the most pur- This popular barrel cactus is noted ness tolerance is at around 10 degrees chased plants for home landscape for the beautiful golden yellow farenheit. Description in Tucson. It is an easy plant to spines that thickly surround the Propagation: Propagation of this cac- This plant is most recognized by the grow and takes no special care. -
AFP 2017 Full Brochure | Treasury and Finance Conference
CTP FP&A CTP FP&A FP&A CTP CTP 12 20+ 125+ 6,500 INNOVATIVE HOURS OF EDUCATIONAL TREASURY FEATURED NETWORKING SESSIONS AND FINANCE SPEAKERS EVENTS PROFESSIONALS Register by September 15 to save $200 + www.AFP2017.org FP&A Contents CTP CTP 1–3 4–6 7–16 17–19 20–21 What We Are CTPFeatured Educational Pre-Conference AFP Executive CTP Excited About Speakers Sessions Workshops Institute 22–23 24–27 28-29 30-31 32-33 Networking Exhibitors and Experience Convince Registration Events Sponsors San Diego Your Boss Information FP&A AFP 2017 Task Force Did you know that the AFP 2017 program is created by a select group of your corporate practitioner peers? Their goal is to create an educational agenda that addresses the challenges, trends and innovations in the treasury and finance profession. CO-CHAIR CO-CHAIR Emmanuel Caprais Saumya Mohan Vice President Americas Region Strategic and Treasurer Financial Planning & Tesla Analysis ITT Corporation FP&A TREASURY MANAGEMENT PAYMENTS TRACK GLOBAL TREASURY & FINANCIAL PLANNING & TRACK Charles Ellert, PMP FINANCE/RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS TRACK Stephen Chiu, CTP Manager, Payment Strategy TRACKS Irena Barisic, FP&A Director, Global Treasury Verizon Communications, Inc. Ping Chen Deputy Chief Financial Officer World Vision International Debbie Kamilaris Senior Director, Capital The Brookings Institution Clifford Ejikeme, CTP Senior Finance Manager Markets & Treasury Planning Emmanuel Caprais Vice President, Treasury Consumer Business Pfizer, Inc. Vice President Strategic and A&E Television Networks, LLC Development Frederick Schacknies Financial Planning & Analysis FP&A Saumya Mohan Johnson & Johnson Vice President & Assistant ITT Corporation Americas Region Treasurer Tom Wolfe, CTP Treasurer Peter Geiler, FP&A Hilton Worldwide, Inc. -
Gastineau Channel Juneau, Alaska Feasibility Report
Gastineau Channel Juneau, Alaska Feasibility Report CHANNEL DEEPENING FOR NAVIGATION ALASKA D l STR l CT CORPS OF ENGl NEEWS NOVEMBER 1977 FEASIBILITY REPORT APPENDIX A - ECONOMICS GASTINEAU CHANNEL, ALASKA PRESENT AND FUTURE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Natural and human resources and developmental trends of the study area are presented to provide a general understanding of their relation to the problems and needs of the area and to establish a "most probable future" for the purpose of benefit and impact analysis. Of particular importance is the role waterways play in the social and economic well-being of the comunity. All waterborne traffic to and from Juneau must use Gastineau Channel. The channel southeast of Juneau is navigable by all classes of vessels, but the northern portion from Juneau-Douglas bridge to Fritz Cove is navigable only by shallow- draft vessels at selected tide levels. A shoaled reach, south of Juneau Airport, is navigable only at high tide and even then, only with current know1 edge of channel conditions. These restrictions cause the majority of traffic to take the longer route around Douglas Island, resulting in increased operating time and costs, a reduction in the navigation season due to adverse weather conditions, and the added risk of life and property because of the longer voyage through unprotected waters. TRIBUTARY AREA Gastineau Channel, a narrow strait about 16 miles long that separates Doug1 as Is1 and from the mainland of southeastern A1 aska, connects Stephens Passage on the east with Fritz Cove on the west. Although much of Southeast Alaska is a general tributary area, the Juneau-Douglas area is the principal contributor. -
Flightseeing Noise Study and Mitigation Option Analysis, RFP 00
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Summary………………………………………………………………………………..………...1 1.0 Methodology …………………………………………………………………………….7 1.1 Criteria……………………………………………………………………………..….7 1.1.1 Exclusion Criteria………………………………………………………….. 7 1.1.2 Rating Criteria …………………...…….………………………………….7 1.1.3 Summary Rating Table ……………………………………………………10 1.2 Companies and Flight Lines ………..………………………………...….……..11 TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc. ……………………..……………………………..11 Coastal Helicopters, Inc …………………………………………………...13 ERA Helicopters, Inc …………………………………………………………...14 North Star Trekking, LLC …………………………………………………...14 1.3 Noise Corridors …………………………………………………………………...20 1.4 Sound Modeling and Monitoring …………………………………………………...24 1.4.1 Background …………………………………………………………...24 1.4.2 Noise Measurement Survey Methodology …………………………...24 Measurement Procedures …………………………………………...28 Instrumentation …………………………………………………...28 Measurement and Analysis Procedures …………………………...29 1.4.3 Computer Modeling ………………………………………………….. 29 2.0 Heliport Management And Facility Requirements …………………………………...30 2.1 Heliport Management………………………………………………..30 2.1.1 Capital Funding …………………………………………………...31 2.2 Facility Requirements …………………………………………...32 3.0 Flight Safety …………………………………………………………………………...36 3.1 Airspace And Air Traffic Control …………………………………………………...36 3.1.1Weather Conditions …………………………………………………...38 3.1.2 Flight Rules …………………………………………………………...39 3.2 FAR Part 77…………………………………………………………………………………44 4.0 Alternate Heliport Sites …………………………………………………………………...46 4.1 Recommended Sites …………………………………………………………...46 4.1.1Dupont -
EXPLORATION and MINING in British Columbia 2004
Ministry of Energy and Mines Mining and Minerals Division EXPLORATION AND MINING in British Columbia 2004 %ULWLVK&ROXPELD0LQLVWU\RI(QHUJ\DQG0LQHV 0LQLQJDQG0LQHUDOV'LYLVLRQ EXPLORATION AND MINING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA - 2004 Ministry of Energy and Mines Mining and Minerals Division Front Cover: Western Keltic Mines Inc revived exploration on the Kutcho Creek volcanogenic massive sulphide property during 2004. Photo shows the exploration crew transporting drill core by helicopter at the property. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Exploration and Mining in British Columbia – 1998- Annual. Continues: Exploration in British Columbia. ISSN 0823-2059 ISSN 1491-4646 = Exploration and Mining in British Columbia 1. Mines and mineral resources – British Columbia – Periodicals. 2. Prospecting – British Columbia – Periodicals. 3. Geology, Economic – British Columbia – Periodicals. 4. British Columbia. Mines Branch TN270.B74 622’.1’09711 C99-805843-3 VICTORIA BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA January 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS BRITISH COLUMBIA MINING AND MINERAL Okanagan ......................................................... 59 EXPLORATION OVERVIEW 2004 Fraser River-Merritt ......................................... 60 Introduction ...............................................................1 Revelstoke........................................................ 60 Mining Highlights......................................................2 Shuswap-North Thompson .............................. 61 Major Development Projects .....................................6 -
Stephens Passage
254 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 8, Chapter 9 19 SEP 2021 134°W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 8—Chapter 9 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage 17300 http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 135°W L 17316 Y N N C A N A L UNITED STCANADA ATES 17315 T Juneau E L N DOUGLAS I ISLAND U K A T I C Y S T R A I T 17313 A 17314 D 58°N M I S R T 17360 E A P H L 17300 E T N S C Y 17311 H P A A S T S H 17363 A I A 17362 WINDHAM BAY G M S E L S T GAMBIER BAY A R A HOBART BAY N I T D PYB PORT HOUGHTON US B AY 17363 17365 I C K S O F R E D E R U N D 19 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 8, Chapter 9 ¢ 255 Stephens Passage (1) This chapter describes Stephens Passage, Holkham during the winter, reaching its maximum in January. Bay, Endicott Arm, Tracy Arm, Taku Harbor, Gastineau The least fog occurs during April to July, inclusive, the Channel, Auke Bay, Tee Harbor and the city of Juneau, minimum being in May. including the communities of Douglas and Auke Bay. (10) (2) Ice ENC - US2AK30M (11) Ice is discharged from glaciers in Tracy and Endicott Chart - 16016 Arms, is always found in Holkham Bay and is prevalent in Stephens Passage off the entrance to that bay.