<<

The Condor 102:864±870 ᭧ The Cooper Ornithological Society 2000

A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF THE DOVE ZENAIDA: MITOCHONDRIAL AND NUCLEAR DNA SEQUENCES1

KEVIN P. J OHNSON2 AND DALE H. CLAYTON Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112±0840

Abstract. We reconstructed a phylogeny for the seven of doves in the genus Zenaida on the basis of a combined analysis of mitochondrial (ND2 and cytochrome b) and nuclear (®brinogen intron 7) DNA sequences. This phylogeny, which is completely resolved, is well supported with all nodes showing greater than 50% bootstrap support. There was no signi®cant con¯ict between trees based on each gene independently, although trees produced from ®brinogen intron 7 did not resolve relationships among ®ve of the Zenaida species. The species status of Z. graysoni, as well as that of Z. meloda, is suggested based on their divergence from sister taxa (about 1% and 4%, respectively) and other differences. Zenaida can be divided into two major groups: Zenaida asiatica and Z. meloda versus Z. aurita, Z. galapagoensis, Z. auriculata, Z. graysoni, and Z. macroura. Key words: ␤-®brinogen intron 7, , cytochrome b, doves, molecular system- atics, ND2, Zenaida.

INTRODUCTION ing the evolution of biogeographic patterns in Members of the New World dove genus Zenaida Zenaida requires a well-supported phylogeny for vary considerably in the sizes of their geograph- the genus. We used sequences of the mitochon- ic ranges. The (Zenaida ma- drial genes cytochrome b (cyt b) and NADH de- croura) and (Z. auriculata) are dis- hydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2), as well as the nu- tributed over North and , respec- clear gene ␤-®brinogen intron 7 (FIB7), to re- tively, whereas the Galapagos Dove (Z. gala- construct a phylogeny for Zenaida. We compare pagoensis) and (Z. graysoni) are the relative utility of mitochondrial and nuclear restricted to small islands. The three remaining genes for reconstructing a phylogeny of this ge- species have intermediate range sizes: the nus. Although the monophyly of Zenaida is not White-winged Dove (Z. asiatica) in southern controversial, the species status of Z. graysoni North and Central America, Paci®c Dove (Z. and Z. meloda remains uncertain (Goodwin meloda) along the west coast of South America, 1983, Baptista 1997). We assessed the status of and the (Z. aurita) in the Carib- these and other Zenaida species on the basis of bean. These biogeographic patterns potentially genetic divergence from sister taxa, relative to make Zenaida a good group for exploring the the divergences between samples of the same relationship of relative population size and bio- species. geography to genetic variation across species. Here we develop a phylogenetic framework for METHODS relationships among Zenaida species. SAMPLES Monophyly of Zenaida is generally accepted We obtained muscle tissue or feathers (from live on the basis of traditional morphological and be- ) of Zenaida, , and Columba spe- havioral characters (Goodwin 1983, Baptista cies from the sources indicated in Table 1. John- 1997), as well as molecular data (Johnson and son and Clayton (2000) identi®ed Leptotila as Clayton 2000). Based on molecular evidence, the sister group of Zenaida, and Columba as a Zenaida is most closely related to New World more distant relative of the Zenaida±Leptotila doves in the genera Leptotila and clade (Fig. 1). (Johnson and Clayton 2000; Fig. 1). Understand- DNA SEQUENCING 1 Received 19 November 1999. Accepted 17 May We extracted total genomic DNA from all sam- 2000. 2 Current address: Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 ples using a Qiagen tissue extraction kit (Qia- East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, e-mail: gen, Valencia, California). We followed manu- [email protected] facturer's protocols except in the case of feather

[864] PHYLOGENY OF ZENAIDA 865

codons and insertions or deletions. We found no evidence for nuclear copies of mitochondrial genes in our sequences. PCR ampli®cations (50 ␮l total) included 1 ␮l Thermo ¯avus polymerase (Epicentre Technol- ogies, Madison, Wisconsin), 3 ␮lofa10␮M

solution of each primer, 3.9 ␮l of MgCl2, 2.5 ␮l of 20X reaction buffer, 35 ␮l distilled water, and between 1 and 4 ␮l of each DNA extract. We performed all ampli®cations using a Perkin El- FIGURE 1. Phylogeny from DNA sequences for mer 9700 Thermocycler with a 2-min 93ЊC melt Columbiformes (Johnson and Clayton 2000) indicating followed by 35 cycles of 30 sec at 93ЊC, 30 sec the position of Zenaida among major lineages of Col- at 46ЊC, and 30 sec at 72ЊC. This was followed umbiformes. by a 7-min 72ЊC extension and a 4ЊC hold. We puri®ed ampli®cation products using a Qiagen PCR puri®cation kit and performed sequencing samples, where we added 30 ␮l of 10% DTT to reactions using a BigDye Terminator kit (Perkin the mix. We next ampli®ed the mito- Elmer, Norwalk, Connecticut). The sequencing chondrial cytochrome b using the primers reactions included either the ampli®cation prim- L14841 (Kocher et al. 1989) and H4a (Harsh- ers or the additional internal primers: H15299 man 1996). The primers L5215 (Hackett 1996) and H6313 (Johnson and Sorenson 1998) were (Kocher et al. 1989) and L15517 (Johnson and used to amplify ND2, and the primers FIB-BI7U Sorenson 1998) for cyt b; L5758 (Johnson and and FIB-BI7L (Prychitko and Moore 1997) were Sorenson 1998) for ND2; and FIB-DOVEF and used for FIB7. Because nuclear copies of mito- FIB-DOVER (Johnson and Clayton 2000) for chondrial genes can potentially confound avian FIB7. Samples were electrophoresed on an ABI mitochondrial sequences, we took several pre- 377 automated sequencing apparatus. We aligned cautions against nuclear copies as suggested by and reconciled the chromatograms from comple- Sorenson and Quinn (1998). We avoided blood mentary strands using Sequencher 3.1 (Gene- samples which have a relatively high copy num- Codes, Madison, Wisconsin). We also aligned se- ber of nuclear genes compared to mitochondrial quences between species with Sequencher. This genes. We ampli®ed mitochondrial genes in produced sequences that included a large portion large (ca. 1,100 bp) pieces and separately from of cyt b (1,070 bp), complete ND2 (1,092 bp), each other. We also checked sequence chromato- and complete FIB7 (ca. 1,100 bp) genes and grams for ambiguities and the sequences for stop some ¯anking regions for each species (GenBank

TABLE 1. Specimens used in the phylogenetic analysis.

Species Common name Sourcea Zenaida macroura Mourning Dove KPJ97-005, Arizona Zenaida macroura Mourning Dove DHC98-004, Texas Zenaida graysoni Socorro Dove LSUMNS, B-23847b Zenaida auriculata Eared Dove FMNH, PS-003, Zenaida galapagoensis Galapagos Dove Tracy Av., UT KPJ97-006b Zenaida galapagoensis Galapagos Dove KPJ98-002, Galapagos Zenaida aurita Zenaida Dove FMNH, SML87-057, Jamaica Zenaida aurita Zenaida Dove FMNH, SML87-062, Jamaica Zenaida asiatica White-winged Dove KPJ97-002, Arizona Zenaida asiatica White-winged Dove DHC98-001, Texas Zenaida meloda Paci®c Dove LSUMNS, B-5236, Leptotila rufaxilla Grey-fronted Dove KUMNH, B793, Peru Columba plumbea Plumbeous Pigeon FMNH, ATP86-136,

a KPJ ϭ ®rst author, DHC ϭ second author, LSUMNS ϭ Louisiana State University Museum of Natural Science, FMNH ϭ Field Museum of Natural History, KUMNH ϭ Kansas Museum of Natural History. b Captive individuals. 866 KEVIN P. JOHNSON AND DALE H. CLAYTON accession numbers AF182658, AF182665± ancestral areas under Brooks' (1990) method. AF182671, AF182691, AF182698±AF182704, We used DIVA (Ronquist 1996) to perform the AF251530±AF251547, AF254349±AF254350). dispersal-vicariance analysis. Brooks' method generally favors dispersal over vicariance, PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS whereas Ronquist's method tends to favor vicar- We constructed trees using unordered parsimony iance as an explanation for biogeographic pat- for all genes independently, and combined, us- terns. ing PAUP* (Swofford 1999) with branch and bound searches. Trees were rooted on Columba RESULTS plumbea, the Plumbeous Pigeon. We evaluated For cyt b, 271 of 1,070 (25.3%) positions were support for all trees using bootstrap data resam- variable and 172 (16.1%) of these were poten- pling with 1,000 full-heuristic replicates (Felsen- tially informative. ND2 showed variation at 337 stein 1985). We compared the phylogenetic in- of 1,092 (30.9%) positions, and 222 of these formation in all gene regions using the partition (20.3%) were informative. FIB7 was much less homogeneity test (Farris et al. 1994, 1995, variable, 93 of 1,119 positions (8.3%), and con- Swofford 1999). We compared rates of diver- tained few informative positions, 27 (2.4%). gence between genes by plotting percent se- Rates of substitution were relatively similar for quence divergence in cyt b, ND2, and FIB7 cyt b and ND2, and both were substantially against each other. To explore the sensitivity of higher (ca. ®ve times) than the rate for ®brino- the phylogeny to weighting scheme, we con- gen intron 7 (Fig. 2). This rate is estimated from ducted parsimony searches using 1:1, 2:1, and the initial slope of the plot of pairwise diver- 5:1 weighting of transversions over transitions. gences in the mitochondrial genes versus the nu- To explore the sensitivity of the phylogeny to clear intron. Rate differences between cyt b and method of analysis, we also performed a maxi- ND2 also are apparent. Although cyt b and ND2 mum likelihood analysis in PAUP*. We used the appear to accumulate substitutions at nearly the simplest model that could not be rejected in fa- same rate at low divergences (less than 10%, vor of a more complex model using the likeli- Fig. 2a), ND2 appears to accumulate more sub- hood-ratio test procedure outlined by Huelsen- stitutions than cyt b at high divergences (greater beck and Crandall (1997). This procedure re- than 10%). This result probably is due to a high- sulted in a model with empirically estimated er level of multiple substitutions in cyt b; note base frequencies, general time reversible substi- that divergence in cyt b appears to level off tutions, and rate heterogeneity according to a when compared to divergence in FIB7 (Fig. 2b), gamma distribution. We used the quartet puz- whereas divergence in ND2 does not (Fig. 2c). zling algorithm (Strimmer and von Haeseler Unweighted parsimony trees based on the 1996) as implemented in PAUP* to derive reli- three genes individually differed slightly (not ability scores for each branch to obtain a mea- shown). Nodes that were in common between all sure of support for branches in the maximum three trees had relatively high bootstrap support likelihood tree. We used the maximum likeli- (Ͼ74% in all trees), whereas nodes that differed hood model on the mitochondrial sequences to between the three trees were supported in less test whether a molecular clock could be rejected than 65% of bootstrap replicates in any one tree. for these sequences using a likelihood ratio test. The phylogeny based on cyt b showed the most We also tested whether the phylogenetic hypoth- resolution, whereas the phylogeny based on esis of Goodwin (1983), who unites Z. aurita FIB7 could not resolve relationships among Z. and Z. galapagoensis because they have 12 tail aurita, Z. galapagoensis, Z. auriculata, Z. ma- feathers instead of 14, could be rejected using a croura, and Z. graysoni. A partition homoge- Templeton (1983) test. neity test indicated that the DNA sequence data from three genes do not differ signi®cantly (P ϭ 0.42), so we combined the gene regions in To attempt to reconstruct ancestral areas of ori- further analyses. Because the FIB7 gene has a gin, we used both Brooks' (1990) method of un- much slower rate of substitution and sorts in- ordered parsimony and Ronquist's (1997) dis- dependently from the mitochondrial genome, we persal-vicariance analysis. We used MacClade also constructed trees based only on the mito- (Maddison and Maddison 1992) to reconstruct chondrial gene regions. The parsimony trees PHYLOGENY OF ZENAIDA 867

FIGURE 3. Tree derived from unordered parsimony of combined cyt b, ND2, and FIB7 DNA sequences (length ϭ 984, RC ϭ 0.635) for Zenaida and out- groups. Numbers above branches indicate percent sup- port from 1,000 full heuristic bootstrap replicates. Numbers below branches are reliability scores from the maximum likelihood quartet puzzling analysis. Branch lengths are proportional to reconstructed DNA se- quence changes. The topology shown also was recov- ered in 2:1 and 5:1 transversion weighted parsimony searches.

analysis yielded a tree identical to the combined parsimony tree. Quartet puzzling reliability scores were greater than 50% for all nodes in the tree. Zenaida appears as a monophyletic ge- nus, with the limited number of outgroups in the current study. The monophyly of Zenaida also was supported in an analysis of many additional outgroups (Johnson and Clayton 2000). Mono- phyly of all species sampled by more than one individual was recovered in the combined tree: Z. asiatica, Z. macroura, Z. galapagoensis, and Z. aurita (Fig. 3). Using the Templeton (1983) test, we could reject Goodwin's (1983) phylo- genetic hypothesis for Zenaida (Fig. 4): P ϭ 0.018. For the two mitochondrial genes, the diver- gence between Zenaida asiatica and Zenaida FIGURE 2. Percent sequence divergences from pair- meloda is 4.2%. The divergence between Z. wise comparisons in Zenaida and outgroups. (a) ND2 versus cyt b; the line indicates expectation given equal rates of substitution, (b) cyt b versus FIB7, (c) ND2 versus FIB7. based on all genes combined or on just the mi- tochondrial genes were identical (Fig. 3). This tree was completely resolved and did not change with transversion weighting; thus, choice of transversion weighting scheme does not impact the results. All nodes are supported at over 50% FIGURE 4. Phylogenetic hypothesis for Zenaida in bootstrap replicates. Maximum likelihood suggested by Goodwin (1983). 868 KEVIN P. JOHNSON AND DALE H. CLAYTON graysoni and Z. macroura is 0.9%. These values con®rm this because the nuclear intron (FIB7) are much higher (ca. 40 and 10 times, respec- showed an approximately ®ve times slower rate tively) than the divergence between individuals of substitution than did the two mitochondrial from different localities or recognized subspe- protein coding genes. This slow substitution rate cies within Zenaida species: 0.09% for Z. asia- made it dif®cult to resolve relationships between tica, 0.1% for Z. macroura, 0.05% for Z. gala- Zenaida species based on FIB7 alone. Very few pagoensis, and 0.05% for Z. aurita. The molec- differences were observed between species in ular clock constraint could not be rejected for FIB7, resulting in a lack of potentially phylo- the mitochondrial sequences under the maxi- genetically informative sites. In addition, species mum likelihood model (P Ͼ 0.10). monophyly within Z. macroura and within Z. Analysis of ancestral areas by Brooks' (1990) aurita was not recovered using just FIB7 be- method indicated an origin of Central America cause of a lack of differentiation from related and the Caribbean or South America for Zenai- species. However, the strongly supported split da. Dispersal-vicariance analysis (Ronquist between Z. asiatica ϩ Z. meloda and all other 1997) provides an equivocal reconstruction of species of Zenaida was recovered using FIB7 the ancestral area for Zenaida and tends to re- alone, and more importantly, the signal between construct ancestral occurrence in several areas. the nuclear and mitochondrial genes was not sig- ni®cantly incongruent. DISCUSSION Our molecular phylogeny is the ®rst assess- A phylogeny based on over 3,000 base pairs of ment of relationships among all species of Zen- sequence including both mitochondrial (cyt b aida using modern systematic methods. The and ND2) and nuclear (FIB7) genes was well combined phylogeny indicates that the White- resolved for the genus Zenaida. All nodes re- winged Dove clade (Z. asiatica ϩ Z. meloda)is ceived Ͼ50% bootstrap support, and tree topol- sister to all other Zenaida. This relationship is ogy did not change with transversion weighting consistent with previous morphological and be- or between parsimony and maximum likelihood. havioral assessments of Zenaida relationships Substitution rates and the potential for multiple (e.g., Fig. 4). The relationships among the other substitution can in¯uence the ability of genes to species of Zenaida indicate that Z. aurita is sis- recover phylogeny. Comparisons of the substi- ter to the remaining Zenaida species. The rela- tution rate of cyt b and ND2 indicated a similar tionships among Z. auriculata, Z. galapagoen- rate of substitution at low divergences (Ͻ 10% sis, and Z. macroura ϩ Z. graysoni are not well cyt b divergence, see Fig. 2a). At greater than supported, but both the parsimony and maxi- 10% cyt b divergence, ND2 appears to accu- mum likelihood trees indicate that Z. galapa- mulate recovered substitutions at a higher rate, goensis is sister to all the other species in this i.e., ND2 is less subject to multiple substitution. group (Fig. 3). In contrast, Goodwin (1983) Thus, cyt b and ND2 may be equally useful for placed Z. aurita and Z. galapagoensis as sisters phylogeny reconstruction at divergences less and Z. macroura and Z. auriculata as sisters, than 10%, but ND2 may perform better at higher because Z. aurita and Z. galapagoensis both divergences. This difference in pattern of mul- have 12 tail feathers instead of the 14 typical of tiple substitution between cyt b and ND2 may other Zenaida (Fig. 4). Our phylogenetic tree not be the same in all avian groups. For exam- implies that either 12 tail feathers is indepen- ple, a lower rate of multiple substitution in ND2 dently derived in Z. aurita and Z. galapagoensis also was found in comparisons of these two or is derived once and then lost in the Z. auri- genes for tanagers (Hackett 1996), orioles (Om- culata, Z. macroura, Z. graysoni clade. land et al. 1999), blackbirds (Johnson and Lan- Data from genetic divergences can provide in- yon 1999), and cuckoos (Johnson et al. 2000). formation on species limits and on the time- However, in dabbling ducks, cyt b and ND2 scales of diversi®cation. The level of mitochon- show a similar rate of substitution up to at least drial genetic divergence between the Central and 14% cyt b sequence divergence (Johnson and North American Z. asiatica and the South Amer- Sorenson 1998). ican Z. meloda (4.2%) is high in relation to a Rates of substitution in vertebrate nuclear mere 0.09% divergence between White-winged genes are generally slower than rates in mito- Doves from Arizona and Texas. The split be- chondrial genes (Brown et al. 1979). Our results tween Z. asiatica and Z. meloda also is recov- PHYLOGENY OF ZENAIDA 869 ered using the slowly evolving nuclear gene. under Brooks' (1990) unordered parsimony These high divergences would generally only method suggest a South American or Central accumulate under long periods of no gene ¯ow American origin. The basal species in the Zen- between populations and indicate that Z. meloda aida tree occur in South and Central America/ should be recognized as a separate species from Caribbean, resulting in this conclusion. Repre- Z. asiatica. Although the plumage of these two sentatives of the closely related genera Leptotila species is quite similar, Z. asiatica and Z. mel- and Geotrygon are also distributed in both these oda differ in soft-part coloration and in vocali- areas, so including many representatives of these zations, further supporting their species status genera in an analysis will be necessary to re- (Baptista 1997). The extent of reproductive iso- solve Zenaida origins in more detail. lation between these two species is unknown, Assuming that colonization of islands from but under phylogenetic (Cracraft 1983, Mc- continental areas is much more likely than the Kitrick and Zink 1988) or evolutionary (Simp- reverse, the Socorro Dove is probably derived son 1951) species concepts their recognition is from the Mourning Dove as has been suggested supported. by earlier authors (Goodwin 1983, Baptista We could not reject a molecular clock con- 1997). The estimated age of the colonization of straint under the maximum likelihood model for from a molecular clock assump- the mitochondrial genes (P Ͼ 0.10). The mito- tion is 450,000 years ago, which is close to the chondrial divergence between Mourning (Z. ma- approximate geological age of the island of croura) and Socorro (Z. graysoni) Doves is 500,000 years (L. Baptista, pers. comm.). The 0.9%, suggesting that the Socorro Dove has colonization of the Galapagos by Zenaida pre- been evolving independently from the Mourning dates the split between Mourning and Eared Dove for approximately 450,000 years (assum- Doves (slightly over 2 million years ago), but ing a mitochondrial molecular clock of 2% per appears to have occurred a considerable amount million years, Klicka and Zink 1997). The So- of time after the geologic formation of the Gal- corro Dove also differs from the Mourning Dove apagos. Another interesting pattern of diver- in plumage, vocalizations, and visual displays gence is the relatively similar divergence be- (Baptista et al. 1983, Baptista 1997). Hybrids tween North and South American counterparts: between the two species are in many cases ster- Mourning vs. Eared Doves and White-winged ile (Baptista 1997). Given these differences and vs. Paci®c Doves. We estimate the speciation our inferred lack of continued gene ¯ow, we events between these counterparts to be between con®rm that the Socorro Dove, now extinct in 2 million and 2.7 million years ago. This is after the wild (Jehl and Parkes 1982), should likely the formation of the Central American land be recognized as a species separate from the bridge (ca. 3 million years ago) and suggests Mourning Dove under any species concept. that perhaps the formation of the bridge facili- In contrast to the high divergence between tated dispersal of Zenaida into Central and North Socorro Dove and Mourning Dove, divergence America leading to speciation. In general it ap- within the Mourning Dove in North America ap- pears that dispersal rather than vicariance has pears to be low. Using mitochondrial restriction been an important cause of speciation in Zen- sites, Ball and Avise (1992) reported a maxi- aida. mum mitochondrial divergence of approximate- ly 0.5% among Mourning Dove haplotypes. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS They also found the same haplotypes in both This paper is dedicated to the memory of L. Baptista, eastern and western subspecies, resulting in a whose enthusiasm for columbiform systematics will be lack of monophyly for these subspecies. Consis- sorely missed. We thank the Field Museum of Natural tent with these results, we found a low mito- History (Chicago, Illinois), the Kansas Museum of Natural History (Lawrence, Kansas), the Louisiana chondrial divergence (0.1%) between the eastern State University Museum of Natural Science (Baton and western individuals that we sampled. Rouge, Louisianna), and the Tracy Aviary (Salt Lake City, Utah) for providing samples for this research. We BIOGEOGRAPHY thank the following individuals and institutions who facilitated ®eld collection of samples: J. Allen, S. Biogeographic reconstruction under vicariance Benn, and G. Waggerman of Texas Parks and Wildlife, scenarios (Ronquist 1997) provide little resolu- D. Blankinship and J. Rupert of the U.S. Fish and tion on the ancestral range of Zenaida. Analysis Wildlife Service, and J. and G. Meadows, B. Smith, P. 870 KEVIN P. JOHNSON AND DALE H. CLAYTON

Else, D. Drown, N. Hillgarth, T. Jones, R. Palma, and JOHNSON, K. P., S. M. GOODMAN, AND S. M. LANYON. S. Nelson. D. Drown, W. Koenig, and two anonymous 2000. A phylogenetic study of the Malagasy couas reviewers provided valuable comments on the manu- with insights into cuckoo relationships. Mol. Phy- script. We thank the DNA Sequencing Facility at the log. Evol. 14:436±444. University of Utah, supported in part by NCI grant JOHNSON,K.P.,AND S. M. LANYON. 1999. Molecular #5p30CA42014. This work was supported by NSF- systematics of the grackles and allies and the ef- Career award DEB-9703003 to DHC. fect of additional sequence (cyt b and ND2). Auk 116:759±768. LITERATURE CITED JOHNSON,K.P.,AND M. D. SORENSON. 1998. Compar- ing molecular evolution in two mitochondrial pro- BALL, R. M., AND J. C. AVISE. 1992. Mitochondrial tein coding genes (cytochrome b and ND2) in the DNA phylogeographic differentiation among avi- dabbling ducks (Tribe: Anatini). Mol. Phylog. an populations and the evolutionary signi®cance Evol. 10:82±94. of subspecies. Auk 109:626±636. KLICKA,J.T.,AND R. M. ZINK. 1997. The importance BAPTISTA, L. 1997. Family Columbidae (pigeons and of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. doves), p. 60±243. In J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, and Science 277:1666±1669. J. Sargatal [EDS.], Handbook of the birds of the KOCHER, T. D., W. K. THOMAS,A.MEYER,S.V.ED- world. Vol. 4. Sandgrouse to Cuckoos. Lynx Ed- WARDS,S.PAÈ AÈ BO,F.X.VILLABLANCA, AND A. C. icions, Barcelona. WILSON. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA BAPTISTA, L. F., W. I. BOARMAN, AND P. K ANDIANIDIS. evolution in : ampli®cation and sequenc- 1983. Behavior and taxonomic status of Grayson's ing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Dove. Auk 100:907±919. 86:6196±6200. ADDISON AND ADDISON BROOKS, D. R. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical M ,W.P., D. R. M . 1992. Mac- biogeography and coevolution: methodological Clade: analysis of phylogeny and character evo- and theoretical update. Syst. Zool. 39:14±30. lution, version 3.04. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. MCKITRICK, M. C., AND R. M. ZINK. 1988. Species BROWN, W. M., M. GEORGE JR., AND A. C. WILSON. 1979. Rapid evolution of mitochondrial concepts in . Condor 90:1±14. DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76:1967±1971. OMLAND, K. E., S. M. LANYON, AND S. J. FRITZ. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the New World orioles CRACRAFT, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Current Ornithol. 1:159±187. (Icterus): the importance of dense taxon sampling. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 12:224±239. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJO,A.G.KLUGE, AND C. PRYCHITKO,T.M.,AND W. S. MOORE. 1997. The utility BULT. 1994. Testing signi®cance of congruence. Cladistics 10:315±320. of DNA sequences of an intron from the ␤-®brin- ogen gene in phylogenetic analysis of woodpeck- FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJO,A.G.KLUGE, AND C. ers (Aves: Picidae). Mol. Phylog. Evol. 8:193± BULT. 1995. Constructing a signi®cance test for 204. incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570±572. RONQUIST, F. 1996. DIVA, version 1.0. Computer pro- FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Con®dence limits on phyloge- gram for MacOS and Win32. Available from: nies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution www.systbot.uu.se/personel/f࿞ronquist.html 39:783±791. RONQUIST, F. 1997. Dispersal-vicariance analysis: a GOODWIN, D. 1983. Pigeons and doves of the world. new approach to the quanti®cation of historical Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY. biogeography. Syst. Biol. 46:195±203. ACKETT H , S. J. 1996. Molecular phylogenetics and bio- SIMPSON, G. G. 1951. The species concept. Evolution geography of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus 5:285±298. (Aves). Mol. Phylog. Evol. 5:368±382. SORENSON,M.D.,AND T. W. Q UINN. 1998. Numts: a HARSHMAN, J. 1996. Phylogeny, evolutionary rates, challenge for avian systematics and population bi- and ducks. Ph.D. diss., Univ. Chicago, Chicago. ology. Auk 115:214±221. HUELSENBECK,J.P.,AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1997. Phy- STRIMMER, K., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1996. Quartet logeny estimation and hypothesis testing using puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: for reconstructing phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 437±466. 13:964±969. JEHL, J. R., JR., AND K. C. PARKES. 1982. The status SWOFFORD, D. L. 1999. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis of the avifauna of the , Mex- using parsimony, version 4.0, beta. Sinauer, Sun- ico. Wilson Bull. 94:1±19. derland, MA. JOHNSON,K.P.,AND D. H. CLAYTON. 2000. Nuclear TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from and mitochondrial genes contain similar phylo- restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with genetic signal for pigeons and doves (Aves: Col- particular reference to the evolution of humans umbiformes). Mol. Phylog. Evol. 14:141±151. and the apes. Evolution 37:221±244.