DOCSLIB.ORG

Juristas Universales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juristas Universales Indice general Volumen I: Juristas antiguos — Prólogo (Mary Ann Glendon) 29 — Introducción (Rafael Domingo) 31 — Relación de colaboradores 41 — Relación de abreviaturas y siglas especiales 71 PRIMERA PARTE: JURISTAS ROMANOS 79 — Introducción (Rafael Domingo) 81 — Semblanzas Manió Maní lio (Manius Manilius) 111 Marco Junio Bruto (Marcus Junius Brutus) 113 Publio Mucio Escévola (Pubiius Mucius Scevola) 115 Quinto Mucio Escévola el Pontífice (Quintus Mucius Scevola Pontifex) .. 117 Aquilio Galo (Caius Aquilius Gallus) 121 Marco Tulio Cicerón (Marcus Tullius Cicero) 124 Servio Sulpicio Rufo (Servius Sulpicius Rufus) 129 Aulo Cascelio (Aulus Cascellius) 135 Trebacio Testa (Caius Trebatius Testa) 137 Alfeno Varo (Pubiius Alfenus Varus) 139 Aulo Ofilio (Aulus Ofilius) 141 Quinto Elio Tuberón el Joven (Quintus Aelius Tubero) 143 Marco Antistio Labeón (Marcus Antistius Labeo) 145 Cayo Ateyo Capitón (Caius Ateius Capito) 150 Masurio Sabino (Masurius Sabinus) 152 Marco Coceyo Nerva padre (Marcus Cocceius Nerva paler) 155 Cayo Casio Longino (Caius Cassius Longinus) 157 Sempronio Próculo (Sempronius Proculus) 159 MaiCO Coceyo Nerva hijo (Marcus Cocceius Nerva filius) 161 Javoleno Prisco (C. Octavius Tidius Tossianus Lucius lavolenus Priscus) 162 5 JURISTAS UNIVERSALES Gaetano Filangieri 777 Joseph de Maistre 781 Jean-Jacques Régis de Cambacérès 786 Heinrich Gottfried Wilhelm Daniels 789 Francisco Martínez Marina 791 Philippe Antoine Merlin de Douai 797 Louis de Boruld »•*•*•*•*«•*****»* « •*•«•*•*•*<•. 799 Alexander Hamilton 802 William Dummer Powell 806 John f\i ti i si i ti i i HÖH Heinrich Friedrich Karl vom Maximilian Joseph Montgelas, conde de Garnerin 815 Claude-Henri de Rouvroy, conde de Saint-Simon 819 Johann Gottlieb Fichte 823 Charles Abbott, Lord Tenterden 831 Jean-Baptiste Sirey 834 James Kent 836 Nicolaus Thaddäus von Gönner 838 Benjamin Constant 842 Karl Ludwig von Haller 853 Napoleón Bonaparte 857 Karl Salomo Zachariae von Lingenthal 860 Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel 864 George Joseph Bell 874 Mijail Mijailovich Speranski 876 Anton Friedrich Justus Thibaut 879 Jean Marie Pardessus 884 Paul Johann Anselm Feuerbach 886 Carl von Rotteck 891 Pierre François Bellot 893 Agustín de Argüelles 896 Henry Hallaro 899 Roger B.Taney 901 Johann Friedrich Ludwig Göschen 907 Jâvier de Hin L'ON 909 Anders Sandoe 0rsted 911 Henry Brougham 914 Joseph Story 922 — Indice onomástico 929 — Indice alfabético de juristas biografiados 981 — Indice de colaboradores 997 14 INDICE GENERAL Volumen III: Juristas del siglo xix — Relación de abreviaturas y siglas especiales 13 QUINTA PARTE: JURISTAS DEL SIGLO XIX 21 — Introducción (Javier Alvarado) 23 — Semblanzas Friedrich Carl von Savigny 59 John Campbell 64 José Hörnern Correia Telles 68 John Bannister Gibson 70 Karl Christian Friedrich Krause 74 Karl Friedrich Eichhorn 78 Lemuel Shaw • 81 Andrés Bello - 84 Daniel Webster 88 James Parke, Lord Wensleydale 92 Florencio García Goyena 94 John McLean - 96 Jacob Grimm - 99 Pedro Sainz de Andino 102 Karl Joseph Anton Mittermaier 106 Thomas Ruff in 108 John Austin • • • • • Hl Carl Theodor Welcker 115 John Beverley Robinson 118 Jean-Baptiste-Marie Duvergier 121 Luigi Taparelli d'Azeglio 123 John James Park 126 Victor-Alexis-Désiré Dalloz 128 i Raymond-Théodore Troplong 130 Eduard Gans 133 Antonio Rosmini Serbati 136 Georg Friedrich Puchta 140 Auguste Comte • 144 Louis Firmin Julien Laferrièrc 150 José Gabriel Ocampo 152 Robert von Mohl 154 Manuel Seijas Lozano 159 Dalmacio Vêlez Sarsfield 161 Friedrich Julius Stahl 166 Julius Hermann von Kirchmann 169 Karl Wilhelm Ernst Heimbach 173 15 JURISTAS UNIVERSALES Adolf August Friedrich Rudorff 176 Frédéric-Charles Rau 178 Jean Charles Demolombe 181 Alexis de Tocqueville 184 1^'râncesco C iiiiiii• ••*«••»•«»*»*•••.••»•*••• t * *•»••«••*•**•»•»• 1. David Dudley Field jr. 197 Pedro Gómez de la Serna 201 John Stuart Mill 203 Heinrich Albert Zachariae 207 Karl David August Röder 210 Aemilius Ludwig Richter 212 Joaquín Francisco Pacheco 216 Johann Caspar Bluntschli 218 Juan Donoso Cortés 222 Pierre Joseph Proudhon 228 Benjamin Robbins Curtis 232 Karl Georg Christoph Beseler 235 Gustav Emst Heimbach 237 Emerico Amari 240 Matteo Pescatore 242 Juan Bautista Alberdi 244 François Laurent 246 Félix María Falguera y Puiguriger 249 Giuseppe Pisanelli 253 Karl Eduard Zachariae von Langenthal 255 Roundell Palmer, Lord Seiborne . 259 Joseph P. Bradley 263 Colin Blackburn 266 Johann Jakob Bachofen 268 Augusto Teixeira de Freitas 276 Samuel F. Miller 278 Rudolf von Gneist 281 Stephen Johnson Field 286 Pasquale Stanislao Mancini 289 Bernhard Windscheid 292 Otto Bahr 296 Theodor Mommsen 298 Karl Marx 302 Rudolf von Jhering 308 Manuel Colmeiro 313 • 16 INDICE GENERAL Matthew Baillie Begbie 316 Burkhard Wilhelm Leist 318 Alois (Aloys) von Brinz 320 Concepción Arenal 322 Hêni*y Sumner ^^3l^6 *.•**.*.*«»»*»•*.•*.» + *••»**«•***••••*»»***** 325 Julián Viso 328 Carl Friedrich von Gerber 331 Manuel Durán y Bas 334 Thomas M. Cooley 339 Ferdinand Lassalle 341 Roderich von Stintzing 344 Gustave Émile Boissonade 347 Walter Bagehot 349 Károly Csemegi 352 Christopher Columbus Langdell 354 Manuel Alonso Martínez 361 Johann Friedrich von Schulte 365 Ernst Immunud Bckkcr * 369 Antonio Cánovas del Castillo 372 Johannes von Miquel 376 Boris Nikolaevic Cicerin 379 Joseph Unger 382 James Fitzjames Stephen 385 Levin Goldschmidt 388 Heinrich Dernburg 392 Antonio Pertile • 396 Charles C Doe 399 Belva Ann Lockwood 402 Levi Maria Jordäo 405 Juüus Glaser 407 My ra C. Bradwell 410 Eugenio Montero Ríos 413 Melville Weston Fuller 416 John Marshall Harlan 420 ^^^iljGrt íÍLIIIÍI 1 4*28 Francesco Schupfer 431 Hermann Roesler 433 Paul Hinschius , 436 Cesare Lombroso 438 Albert Venn Dicey 441 Adolf Merkel 444 Gustav von Schmoller 448 17 • JURISTAS UNIVERSALES Oskar Bülow 452 Emil Friedberg 454 Luigi Mattirolo 456 Tobias Michael Carel Asser 458 PaulLaband 461 James Bryce 464 Tobias Barrero de Menezes 466 John Chipman Gray 468 Francisco Giner de los Ríos 472 Paul Viollet 476 Heinrich Brunner 478 Gumersindo de Azcárate 480 Paul Krüger 482 Georg Meyer 485 Anton Menger 487 Rudolph Solim 494 Ernst Rudolf Bierling 496 Karl Binding 498 Otto von Gierke 501 Oliver Wendeil Holmes jr. 506 Franz Xaver Wernz 515 Kowashi Inoue 517 William Anson 519 Adolf Wach . 522 Ludwig Enneccerus 525 Fedor Fedorovich Martens 527 Edward Douglass White . 531 Frederick Pollock 536 James Barr Arnes 541 Joaquín Costa 546 Otto Mayer 553 Adhémar Esmein (Jean Paul Hyppolite Emmanuel Esmein) 561 Karl von Amira 564 Josef Kohler 567 Eugen Huber 571 Lf> OttoLenel 574 Frederic Will Felipe Sánchez Román 586 Philipp Lotmar 595 Edouard Cuq 598 Georg Jellinek 600 ^^t*3.nz von Liszt .«•*•»•*•>*» •***•« •#•#•*##••»#•*••***•*••**•• 605 18 ÍNDICE GENERAL Raffaele Garofalo 610 Eduardo de Hinojosa y Naveros 614 Ernst Zitelmann 618 Paul Frédéric Girard 620 Pietro Gasparri 623 Vicente Santamaría de Paredes 626 Antonio Maura 629 Marcel-Fernand Planiol 637 Carlo Fadda 640 Paul Fournier 642 Paul Vinogradoff 644 Franz Klein 647 Moriz Wlassak 650 Raymond Saleilles 653 Nobushige Hozumi 655 Lodo vico Mortara 658 Cesare Vivante 660 Konrad Hellwig 663 Enrico Ferri 665 Maurice Hauriou 668 Vittorio Scialoja 672 Rudolf Stammler 677 Louis Dembitz Brandeis 682 Silvio Perozzi 684 Luis Claro Solar 686 Émile Dürkheim ' 690 Lassa Francis Lawrence Oppenheim 693 Francesco Brandileone 695 Masaakira Tomii 697 Gaetano Mosca 699 Francesco Scaduto 702 Philipp Nicolai von Heck 706 Contardo Ferrini 711 Ludwig Mitteis 715 Leon Du^uit * • * 719 Ernst Fuchs - 722 Willis van Devanter 725 Clóvis Bevilaqua 728 Kenjiro Urne 730 Yatsuka Hozumi 732 Hugo Preuss 734 Ernst Landsberg 737 19 JURISTAS UNIVERSALES Otto Gradenwitz 740 Adolfo Posada 743 Vittorio Emanuele Orlando 746 Bernardino Alimena 749 Pedro Dorado Montero 750 Max Rümelin 753 Raymond Carré de Malberg 755 François Gény 761 Samuel Williston 766 Eugen Ehrlich 770 George Sutherland 772 John Rogers Commons 775 James C. McReynolds 777 Charles E. Hughes 780 Francesco Ruffini 784 John Henry Wigmore 788 Max Weber 790 Emil Seckel 794 Andreas von Tuhr 797 Pietro Bonfante 801 Karl Wieland 805 GinoSegrè 811 Salvatore Riccobono 813 Henri-Lucien Capitant 816 Paul Oertmann 822 Ernst Beling 824 IPierce ^3utler ...................••»•«•«••.•••••»•••»••••»••••«••••. 829 Felipe demente de Diego 832 Nicola Coviello 835 Leon Petrazycki 837 James R. Atkin, Lord Atkin 839 Gerhard Anschütz 842 Dionisio Anzilotti 845 Ulrich Stutz 847 Axel Hägerström 849 Heinrich Triepel 852 Oreste Ranelletti 856 Paul Collinet 859 Enno Becker 861 Antonio José Uribe Gaviria 864 Gaston Jèze , 868 Benjamin N. Cardozo 870 • 20 ÍNDICE GENERAL Roscoe Pound 876 William Searle Holdsworth 883 Giuseppe Chiovenda 885 Federico Cammeo 888 Harlan F. Stone 891 Alphonse van Hove 893 Martin Wolff 896 Vincenzo Manzini 898 Learned Hand 900 Walter Wheeler Cook 903 Ángel Ossorio y Gallardo 906 Tatsukichi Minobe 910 Lodovico (Ludovico) Barassi 913 James Goldschmidt 915 Leopold Wenger 917 Ernst R^äbcl * • 919 Pier Silverio Leicht 921 Rudolf Müller-Erzbach 924 Arthur L. Corbin 927 Max Ernst Mayer 930 Roberto De Ruggiero 933 Alfredo Rocco 935 Hugo Sinzheimer 937 Santi Romano 941 José Alberto dos Reis 944 Julius von Gierke • 946 Arturo Rocco 948 Hermann Kantorowicz 950 Francesco Ferrara 952 Giuseppe Messina : 955 Niceto Alcalá-Zamora y Torres 957 Gustav Radbruch 962 Georges Scelle 966 Giorgio Del Vecchio 969 Paul Koschaker 971 Adolfo Ravà . 974 FritzSchulz 977 Antonio Cicu 979 Antonio Scialoja 981 Leo Rosenberg 984 William Henry Beveridge 986 Frâiicesco Cânielutti
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dossier: Realismo Jurídico Contemporáneo
    º , . Dossier: º , . Realismo jurídico contemporáneo Iuris Dictio Director editorial Diego Falconí Trávez Coordinador editorial Efraín Caravantes Comité científico Catalina Botero (Universidad de los Andes, Colombia), Paolo Carozza (Notre Dame University, Estados Unidos), Larry Catá Backer (Penn State Law, Estados Unidos), Fabián Corral Burbano de Lara (Academia Ecuatoriana de la Lengua, Ecuador), Alejandro Guzmán (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile), András Jakab (Instituto de Estudios Jurídicos de la Academia Húngara de las Ciencias, Hungría), Esther Torrellas (Universidad de Salamanca, España), Peter Van den Bossche (Maastricht University, Holanda), Virginia Zambrano (Universidad de Salerno, Italia). Comité editorial Marena Briones, Eddy de la Guerra, Johanna Fröhlich, Andrés Felipe López Latorre, Andrés Martínez, Álvaro Paúl, José Gustavo Prieto, Daniela Salazar. Asistentes editoriales Analía Andrade, Aura Chiriboga, José Gabriel Cornejo, Sebastián Correa, Josselyn Espinosa, María Paula Marroquín. Diseñadora Mayra Overney-Falconí Webmaster Jaime Páez Maquetador Krushenka Bayas Traductora Megan Edwards Revisores pares Sebastián Agüero, Pablo Alarcón, Toalí Bayancela, Andrés Botero, Juan Cevallos, Eddy de la Guerra, Diego Falconí, Johanna Fröhlich, Juan Francisco González, Pau Luque, Luca Malagoli, Marco Morales, Diego Moreno Cruz, Mareva Orozco, Giuseppa Ottimofiore, Lina Parra, Pier Paolo Pigozzi, Juan Carlos Prado, Julieta Rábanos, Pablo Rapetti, Sebastián Reyes, Catherine Ricaurte, Marco Segatti, Farith Simon, Vicente Solano, Rafael Vásquez, Jaime Vintimilla, Matija Zgur Licencia legal: Reconocimiento- NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. LC: KHK 10 .I97 CDD: 340.05 Iuris Dictio [Publicación Periódica] / Revista del Colegio de Jurisprudencia de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Año 1, No 1 (ene 2000), Quito: Universidad San Francisco de Quito, 2000-v. Semestral –junio-diciembre ISSN: 1390-6402 e-ISSN: 2528-7834 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Thinking Revised
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1959 Legal Thinking Revised Max Rheinstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Max Rheinstein, "Legal Thinking Revised," 33 Tulane Law Review 728 (1959). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVIEWS LEGAL THINKING REVISED. By A. Vilhelm Lundstedt. Stock- holm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 1956. Pp. 420. What are the right mental processes by which issues of law are to be determined? This question of the "right" legal method has prominently occupied the minds of legal thinkers, especially of the earlier decades of the twentieth century. Mental processes which had been applied during the nineteenth century and had come to be regarded as being self-evident and as the only possible ones, came to be questioned and attacked, and different approaches came to be advocated as more appropriate for the solution of the legal prob- lems of the new century. The country in which the methodological question was raised earliest was Germany, where the traditional method of the nineteenth century Pandectists was attacked in the 1860s by von Buelow and somewhat later, more violently and with greater efficacy, by von Jhering. Around the turn of the century the question de la mfthode was raised in France by G~ny, Saleilles and Duguit.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    PUBLISHED BY BRATISLAVA THE FACULTY OF LAW, COMENIUS UNIVERSITY IN BRATISLAVA LAW ISSN (print): 2585-7088 REVIEW ISSN (electronic): 2644-6359 SCANDINAVIAN LEGAL REALISM AND THE CHALLENGE OF RECOGNIZING EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE AS A LEGAL NORM / Jenna Uusitalo Jenna Uusitalo, M.A. in Law; Abstract: Emergency medical service (EMS) forms a sub-category PhD. student, Faculty of Law, of the internationally recognized right to health. However, despite University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, the codification of the right to health in various human rights 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; conventions which have been implemented in national legislation, [email protected]; EMS still seems to be regarded as an economic expense or a ORCID: 0000-0002-7799-7289. political decision rather than a legal norm or a human right. This paper evaluates the causes for such a misunderstanding, primarily through Scandinavian Legal Realism which emphasizes the social contextualization of law. Supplementary scholarly views, as well as a history of human rights, are also applied to support the main arguments. Essentially, the paper claims that the challenge of recognizing EMS as a legal norm is associated with the relatively abstract and impersonalized nature of emergency care. Key words: Emergency Medical Service; Human Rights; Legal Philosophy; Scandinavian Legal Realism Suggested citation: Uusitalo, J. (2020). Scandinavian Legal Realism and the Challenge Submitted: 06 July 2020 of Recognizing Emergency Medical Service as a Legal Norm. Accepted: 07 September
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Scandinavian Realism
    THE CONCEPT OF SCANDINAVIAN REALISM SAEESH NAIK FY. LLM JURISPRUDENCE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SR NO. CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 BASIC FEATURES OF 5 REALIST SCHOOL 3 THE SCANDINAVIAN 6 REALISTS 4 PHILOSOPHICAL 7 BACKGROUND 5 AXEL HAGERSTORM 9 6 KARL OLIVECRONA 12 7 ALF ROSS 17 8 ANDERS VILHELM 19 LUNDSTEDT 9 LAW AS FACT 21 10 CRITICISM AGAINST 24 REALISM 11 REALISM IN THE INDIAN 25 CONTEXT 12 CONCLUSION 29 13 BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 2 INTRODUCTION In the nineteenth and in the early years of the twentieth century, laissez-faire1 was the dominant creed in America. This creed was associated, in the intellectual sphere, with a certain attachment to what has been called “formalism” in philosophy and the social sciences. This was marked by the reverence for the role of logic and mathematics and ‘a priori’2 reasoning as applied to philosophy, economics and jurisprudence, with but little urge to link these empirically to the facts of life. Yet empirical science and technology were increasingly dominating American society and with this development arose an intellectual movement in favour of treating philosophy and the social sciences, and even logic itself, as empirical studies not rooted in abstract formalism. In America this movement was associated with such figures as William James and Dewey in philosophy and logic, Veblen ion economics, Beard and Robinson in historical studies, and Mr. Justice Holmes in jurisprudence. It is important to note that this movement was especially hostile to the so-called British empirical school derived from Hume, and to which Bentham, Austin and Mill adhered.
    [Show full text]
  • Derecho, Moral Y Política
    UNIVERSITAT DE VALÈNCIA DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFÍA DEL DERECHO, MORAL Y POLÍTICA DOCTORADO EN DERECHOS HUMANOS, PAZ Y DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE TESIS: “BASES PARA UNA TEORÍA DEL PLURALISMO JURÍDICO. EL RECONOCIMIENTO DEL DERECHO INDÍGENA EN GUERRERO, MÉXICO”. DOCTORANDO: JOAQUÍN MORALES SÁNCHEZ DIRECTOR: DR. JESÚS BALLESTEROS LLOMPART VALENCIA, ESPAÑA, 2013. II ÍNDICE AGRADECIMIENTOS .........................................................................................................- 9 - PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA ............................................................................... - 11 - METODOLOGÍA EMPLEADA ........................................................................................... - 12 - INTRODUCCIÓN GENERAL ............................................................................................ - 15 - CAPÍTULO I ¿QUÉ ES EL DERECHO? 1. Nociones del derecho ................................................................................................... - 21 - 1.1. Iusnaturalismo ........................................................................................................ - 24 - 1.2. Iuspositivismo ......................................................................................................... - 27 - 1.3. Iusrealismo ............................................................................................................. - 36 - 2. Una perspectiva pluralista del derecho ......................................................................... - 43 - 3. Aspectos necesarios para
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Rights and Private Law
    1 Rights and Private Law DONAL NOLAN AND ANDREW ROBERTSON* I. INTRODUCTION N RECENT YEARS a strand of thinking has developed in pri- vate law scholarship which has come to be known as ‘rights’ or I ‘rights-based’ analysis. This kind of analysis seeks to develop an understanding of private law obligations which is driven, primarily or exclusively, by the recognition of the rights we have against each other, rather than by other infl uences on private law, such as the pursuit of community welfare goals. Rights-based theories of contract,1 torts2 and unjust enrichment3 have been developed. A number of doctrines within the law of tort have been subjected to rights analysis.4 Thinking on the law of property has been informed by innovative analysis of the nature of property rights.5 The relationship between primary rights and the second- * We are grateful to Allan Beever, Peter Cane, Helge Dedek, Gregory Keating, Jason Neyers and Robert Stevens for their helpful comments on an earlier draft. The usual caveat applies. 1 See, eg, P Benson, ‘The Unity of Contract Law’ in P Benson (ed), The Theory of Con- tract Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001) 118. On rights-based theories of contract more generally, see SA Smith, Contract Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004) 140–58. 2 R Stevens, Torts and Rights (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007). 3 See, eg, EJ Weinrib, ‘The Normative Structure of Unjust Enrichment’ in C Rickett and R Grantham (eds), Structure and Justifi cation in Private Law: Essays for Peter Birks (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2008) 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Views in Jurisprudential Theories
    [Vol. 107 PSYCHOLOGICAL VIEWS IN JURISPRUDENTIAL THEORIES RoBERT S. REDMOUNT - Jurisprudential inquiry proceeds upon certain assumptions about the nature of nan. Psychological theorizing is an enterprise directed toward the critical examination of assumptions such as these, and the formulation of hypotheses about human conduct. Yet despite the patent interdependence of these disciplines, there has been little effort made to correlate them. In this Article, Mr. Redmount, who is both a psychologist and a lawyer, examines the psychological theories of certain jurisprudents,and the theories of law of certain psychologists. Building upon this discussion, the author offers a set of systematized hypotheses which center about the psychological dependency of the individual on his environment. Mr. Redmount's prior writings have dealt with the application of psychological principles to the nore practical courtroom aspects of law. It seems strange, at least to a psychologically trained person, that theories relating to law give so little consideration to psychological man. It is as though man were substantially an incident of law or that his adaptation to conceptions of law is to be taken as a matter of course. Perhaps there is some implicit notion concerning the nature of man that is built into the theorizing given to law, or perhaps there is the feeling that man cannot be understood except as he is part of some larger social process. It is, in fact, more reassuring to take man for granted because only in that way can one most effectively exercise the gifts of thought. And legal theorists are thinking persons wedded to thought as the mainspring of human action, regarding it as the legitimate source of experience, motivation and control.
    [Show full text]
  • BLR 2020 2 Komplet
    SEMI-ANNUAL SCHOLARLY LEGAL JOURNAL OF COMENIUS UNIVERSITY IN BRATISLAVA FACULTY OF LAW ISSN (print): 2585-7088 ISSN (online): 2644-6359 EV: 5519/17 DOI: 10.46282/blr.2020.4.2 EDITOR IN CHIEF Ondrej Blažo / Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia EDITORIAL BOARD Ondrej Hamuľák / Palacký University in Olomouc, Czechia secretary of editorial board Rainer Arnold / University of Regensburg, Germany Gábor Hamza / Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest, Hungary Matej Horvat / Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Philip M. Genty / Columbia Law School, USA Peter Lysina / Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Joseph Marko / University of Graz, Austria Katrin Nyman-Metcalf / Talinn University of Technology, Estonia Matthias Niedobitek / Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany Wojciech Piątek /Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland Václav Stehlík /Palacký University in Olomouc, Czechia Tomáš Strémy /Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Márton Várju /Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary Laurent Waelkens / KU Leuven, Belgium EDITORIAL OFFICE CONTACT executive editor: Comenius University in Bratislava Olexij M. Meteňkanyč Faculty of Law Šafárikovo nám. 6 junior executive editors: 811 00 Bratislava Adam Köszeghy Slovakia Adam Máčaj [email protected] Terézia Švedová Published twice a year by Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law print and online: https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk https://doi.org/10.46282/blr Volume 4 Issue 2 was published 31 December 2020 Texts © Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law and authors, 2020 Cover and Layout © Štefan Blažo, 2020 The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • The Realistic Concept of the Law
    Original Paper UDC 1:34.01 Received March 11th, 2012 Dragan M. Mitrović,1 Marko S. Trajković2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 67, RS–11000 Beograd 2 University of Niš, Faculty of Law, Trg Kralja Aleksandra 11, RS–18000 Niš [email protected], [email protected] The Realistic Concept of the Law Abstract The law is an extremely complex phenomenon. It is very difficult to determine it precisely as the complete comprehension and ultimate definition of the law are beyond human capabili- ties. Also, the law never coincides with its concept, nor does the concept of the law coincide with its definition. This fact shows that the real human capabilities for the comprehension, determination and definition of the law are very limited and the limits are unreliable. The concept of the law is relative as well, which is why all the definitions of the law are also relative. The concept and the definition of the law are also relative because they are of ne- cessity subjective. It is for this reason that they are never truthful. However, even when they are not truthful, they are always useful. Because of these essential cognitive shortcomings and limitations, the law is determined and defined realistically – in a conventional and op- erative manner – whenever it is possible to do so. Additional difficulties are created by the fact that the number of conventional concepts and definitions of the law is almost limitless. Fortunately, only a number of them, considered operative, are used in the law. And all this because of a possible usefulness.
    [Show full text]
  • A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence the Law
    A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Volume 1 The Law and the Right A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Editor-in-Chief Enrico Pattaro, CIRSFID and Law Faculty, University of Bologna, Italy Advisory Board Norberto Bobbio † Ronald M. Dworkin, School of Law, New York University, USA and Faculty of Law, University College London, UK Lawrence M. Friedman, Standford Law School, Stanford University, USA Knud Haakonssen, Department of History, University of Sussex, UK Associate Editors Gerald J. Postema, Department of Philosophy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA Peter G. Stein, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, UK Assistant Editor Antonino Rotolo, CIRSFID and Law Faculty, University of Bologna, Italy A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence Volume 1 The Law and the Right A Reappraisal of the Reality that Ought to Be by Enrico Pattaro CIRSFID and Law Faculty, University of Bologna, Italy with an Appendix by Alberto Artosi, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor and Silvia Vida Assistant Editor: Corrado Roversi A C.I.P. Catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. 5 Volume Set: ISBN-10 1-4020-3387-7 (HB) Springer Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York ISBN-10 1-4020-3505-5 (e-book) Springer Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York ISBN-13 978-1-4020-3387-2 (HB) Springer Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York ISBN-13 978-1-4020-3505-0 (e-book) Springer Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York Published by Springer, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 2005 Springer No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Katalog Backamo 210822 Söndag.Pdf
    Västra Kennelklubben 22/8-2021 Nordic Dog Show UTSTÄLLNINGSKATALOG VÄSTRA KENNELKLUBBENS NORDIC DOG SHOW Backamo, Ljungskile den 22 augusti 2021 Alla rasgrupper UTSTÄLLNINGENS BESTYRELSE: Ove Johansson Christina Johansson Elissabeth Turtle KOMMISSARIE: Martin Lövdahl Fast UTSTÄLLNINGSADMINISTRATÖR: BUS CUA: Eva Andersson INFO/SEKRETARIAT: Eva Andersson, Christina Ling Larsson RESULTATANSVARIG: BUS FINALSPEAKER: Liz-Beth Carlsson Liljeqvist, Mikael Nilsson VETERINÄR: Magdalena Nordmark-Rojas HANDRÄCKNINGSPERSONAL: VAKK, Ljungskile Sportklubb Ödsmåls Idrottsklubb VID SJUKDOMSFALL: Kontakta informationen RASER OCH RASGRUPPER 2424 HUNDAR HAR ANMÄLTS TILL SÖNDAGEN. RASERNA ÄR FÖRDELADE PÅ 10 OLIKA RASGRUPPER OCH 227 RASER. VILL NI LETA UPP EN RAS I KATALOGEN SÅ SLÅ UPP RASREGISTRET SOM FINNS SIST I KATALOGEN, DÄR DELTAGANDE RASER FINNS I ALFABETISK ORDNING. VÄSTRA KENNELKLUBBEN ÖNSKAR ALLA LYCKA TILL! ARRANGERANDE KLUBB FRITAR SIG OCH SINA FUNKTIONÄRER FRÅN ALLT ANSVAR FRÅN SKADA OCH FÖRLUST SOM KAN UPPSTÅ FÖR HUNDÄGAREN I SAMBAND MED UTSTÄLLNINGEN. DETSAMMA GÄLLER SKADA VILKEN FÖRORSAKATS AV HUND UNDER PÅGÅENDE UTSTÄLLNING SÅVIDA DET EJ KAN LEDAS I BEVIS ,ATT SKADAN VARIT EN FÖLJD AV UPPENBART BRISTANDE UTSTÄLLNINGSARRANGEMANG. 1 Västra Kennelklubben 22/8-2021 Nordic Dog Show 07.00 Vaccinationskontroll och insläpp hundar pass 1 08.00-11.00 Bedömning av hundar i pass 1 12.00 Vaccinationskontroll och insläpp hundar pass 2 13.00-16.00 Bedömning av hundar pass 2 Finaltävlingar TÄVLAN OM DAGENS BÄSTA HUND I GRUPP 1 DOMARE: Evav Nielsen TÄVLAN OM
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Crisis in the Legal Sciences
    Identity Crisis in the Legal Sciences Mark Van Hoecke (Ghent University & Tilburg University) In: Festschrift für Hubert Rottleuthner, Gesellschaft und Gerechtigkeit, Nomos 2011, pp.423-436 1. History of Legal Doctrine before the 19th Century Of all disciplines, legal science is probably the second oldest, after philosophy, just as lawyers are said to practise the second oldest profession (be it not after that of philo- sophers). The development of legal science during the Roman empire is considered to have started in the late Republican period (200 to 100 before Christ)1 and was mostly flourishing during the second and third century of the Christian calendar. This included highly developed law schools and a lot of quality scholarly writings2. During the 11th century, universities were founded, first in Bologna, partly prompted by scholarly research on rediscovered texts on Roman law. For many centuries universities had, besides the law faculty, only three other faculties, namely theology, arts and medicine. At least until the 18th century, legal science, in the form of legal doctrine, kept a very strong position, both within and outside academia. In the 18th and more so in the 19th centuries, however, the position of legal doctrine changed dramatically. With the advent and rapid development of the exact sciences and their successful research results, the conception of 'science' changed radically. During the Middle-Ages, 'authority' was a core criterion for considering an utterance to be 'scientific', while 'empirical evidence' was of little relevance. The disciplines taught at universities during the Middle-Ages were human sciences and the main criterion for their scholarly character was of a methodological nature: whether one was considered to be a scholar depended on the formal way in which one tried to prove something, mainly through logical syllogisms, and with the help of philosophy3.
    [Show full text]