The System Identification (SID) List Last Updated: 8/2010
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J
Hastings Law Journal Volume 50 | Issue 6 Article 5 1-1999 The aM gnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout Jim Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jim Chen, The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J. 1503 (1999). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol50/iss6/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout by JIM CHEN* Table of Contents I. High N oon .................................................................................. 1504 II. The Gunslingers, Then and Now ...................... 1506 A. The Opening Round ........................................................... 1507 B. The Magnificent Seven ...................................................... 1511 (1) POTS and PANS, Hedgehogs and Foxes ................... 1511 (2) Lord Low Everything Else ................. 1513 III. The Legal Mothers of Merger Mania ...................................... 1514 A. Statutory Starters .............. ............ 1515 (1) Section 251 and Allied Provisions ............................... 1516 (2) Section 271: BOC Entry into InterLATA Carriage .1519 * Professor of Law and Vance K. Opperman Research -
HAC022708 1.Pdf
Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Section 68.4(a) of the Commission’s Rules ) Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones ) WT Docket No. 01-309 ) Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the ) Commission’s Rules ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 26, 2008 Released: February 27, 2008 By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 3 III. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................ 9 A. Waiver Requests from Tier III Carriers ........................................................................................... 9 1. CDMA and GSM Carriers....................................................................................................... 10 a. Advantage, BLEW, Brazos, Cellcom, FMTC Mobile, Inland, Lamar, Mid-Tex, MTPCS, NCR1P, Nemont, NTCH, NWMC, Peoples, Plateau, Pocket, Simmetry, South Central, Thumb, West Central, and XIT................................................................. 11 b. Airadigm, Blanca, CTC, Farmers Cellular, Litchfield, NDNC, PTSI, South Slope, and UBET Wireless .............................................................................................. -
Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers
Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers November 1997 Jim Lande Katie Rangos Industry Analysis Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 This report is available for reference in the Common Carrier Bureau's Public Reference Room, 2000 M Street, N.W. Washington DC, Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file name LOCAT-97.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link computer bulletin board system at (202) 418-0241. Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers Contents Introduction 1 Table 1: Number of Carriers Filing 1997 TRS Fund Worksheets 7 by Type of Carrier and Type of Revenue Table 2: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 9 Carriers that filed a 1997 TRS Fund Worksheet or a September 1997 Universal Service Worksheet, with address and customer contact number Table 3: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 65 Listing of carriers sorted by carrier type, showing types of revenue reported for 1996 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) and 65 Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Cellular and Personal Communications Services (PCS) 68 Carriers Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 83 Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) 86 Paging and Other Mobile Service Carriers 111 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 118 Other Toll Service Providers 119 Pay Telephone Providers 120 Pre-paid Calling Card Providers 129 Toll Resellers 130 Table 4: Carriers that are not expected to file in the 137 future using the same TRS ID because of merger, reorganization, name change, or leaving the business Table 5: Carriers that filed a 1995 or 1996 TRS Fund worksheet 141 and that are unaccounted for in 1997 i Introduction This report lists 3,832 companies that provided interstate telecommunications service as of June 30, 1997. -
Telecommunications Provider Locator
Telecommunications Provider Locator Industry Analysis & Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau February 2003 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail [email protected]. This report can be downloaded and interactively searched on the FCC-State Link Internet site at www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/locator.html. Telecommunications Provider Locator This report lists the contact information and the types of services sold by 5,364 telecommunications providers. The last report was released November 27, 2001.1 All information in this report is drawn from providers’ April 1, 2002, filing of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A).2 This report can be used by customers to identify and locate telecommunications providers, by telecommunications providers to identify and locate others in the industry, and by equipment vendors to identify potential customers. Virtually all providers of telecommunications must file FCC Form 499-A each year.3 These forms are not filed with the FCC but rather with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which serves as the data collection agent. Information from filings received after November 22, 2002, and from filings that were incomplete has been excluded from the tables. Although many telecommunications providers offer an extensive menu of services, each filer is asked on Line 105 of FCC Form 499-A to select the single category that best describes its telecommunications business. -
Wireless Call Trace Procedure Version 2.4
Document date: 07/01/2011 Wireless Call Trace Procedure Version 2.4 Prepared by: Systems 3/7/06 Revised 12/30/14 Page 1 of 8 Document date: 07/01/2011 Purpose of Document The following document establishes a procedure for obtaining tower or subscriber information for wireless 9-1-1 calls. This procedure may be used in the event the caller has been disconnected and is believed to be in an emergency situation where the billing information (often the home address) may provide the location of the caller. For example, a call is received where a person is screaming hysterically and then is suddenly disconnected. If the dispatcher is unable to reach the caller by using the call back number they may choose to use this procedure. Following this procedure, a dispatcher can use the callback number provided on the ALI screen to obtain the home address of the person who owns that phone in hopes of obtaining further information on where the caller may be located. Definitions This policy applies only to wireless 9-1-1 calls and not wireline 9-1-1 calls. For the purposes of this document, the terms below are defined as follows; Subscriber Information Number : This number will provide you with subscriber name, billing address, home number, and other identifying information. In the event the Subscriber Information Number listed in this policy is not correct, contact the NOC to obtain a contact number for subscriber information. Please notify S911D for update of this document. NOC Number : This number will provide you with tower location information. -
Wireless Telecommunications in Local Markets: Policies for Inclusion
NRRI 97-13 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN LOCAL MARKETS: POLICIES FOR INCLUSION by Vivian Witkind Davis, Ph.D. Senior Policy Analyst Michael E. Clements Graduate Research Associate June 1997 This paper is one of a series of NRRI analyses of issues in state telecommunications policy that derive from passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those of The National Regulatory Research Institute, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC), or any NARUC member commissions. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN LOCAL MARKETS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the “telewars”1 now being fought in the states and at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the weapons are logic and persuasion. Each player is certain to argue that “all players are equal” when it suits them and that “some players are more equal than other” when it would benefit employees, stockholders and their own view of public concerns. Policy makers in this environment have the difficult task of making decisions that treat players alike or unalike as appropriate to meet ambitious, amorphous goals of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Wireless telecommunications has been well nurtured by U.S. policy. The very success of this encouragement calls for assuring that as wireless telecommunications becomes a true alternative to wireline, wireless providers have appropriate rights and obligations. Providers of wireless services will be powerful participants in building an intermeshed “network of networks” where all companies and technologies can compete fairly. Just like landline service through the public switched network, wireless offers voice and data communications, but with a valuable extra selling point—mobility. -
Addresses for Text Notices
ADDRESSES FOR TEXT NOTICES List of Text Message Gateways Carrier Gateway 3 River Wireless [email protected] Advantage Communcations [email protected] AirFire Mobile [email protected] AirVoice [email protected] Aio Wireless [email protected] Alaska Communications [email protected] Alltel (Allied Wireless) [email protected] Ameritech [email protected] Assurance Wireless [email protected] AT&T Mobility [email protected] AT&T Enterprise Paging [email protected] BellSouth [email protected] BellSouth (Blackberry) [email protected] BellSouth Mobility [email protected] Bluegrass Cellular [email protected] Bluesky Communications [email protected] Boost mobile [email protected] Call Plus [email protected] Carolina Mobile Communications [email protected] CellCom [email protected] Cellular One [email protected] Cellular One East Coast [email protected] Cellular One PCS [email protected] Cellular One South West [email protected] Cellular One West [email protected] Cellular South [email protected] Centennial Wireless [email protected] Central Vermont Communications [email protected] CenturyTel [email protected] Chariton Valley Wireless [email protected] Chat Mobility [email protected] Charter *see ‘Spectrum Mobile’ ADDRESSES FOR TEXT NOTICES Cincinnati Bell [email protected] Cingular Wireless [email protected] Cingular (GSM) [email protected] Cingular (TDMA) [email protected] -
The Public's Interest in Telecom Reform
THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN TELECOM REFORM: POST-REFORM PERFORMANCE OF THE MEXICAN TELECOM SECTOR DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lilia Judith Pérez Chavolla, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2002 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Susan Kline, Adviser ___________________________ Adviser Professor Rohan Samarajiva, Co-adviser School of Journalism and Communication Professor Robert Graniere ___________________________ Co-adviser School of Journalism and Communication Copyright by Lilia J. Pérez-Chavolla 2002 ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the public interest discourse that accompanies the implementation of telecommunication institutional reforms in developing countries. Whereas previous research has focused on interpretations of the public interest concept by policymakers, this dissertation addresses the point of view of consumers affected by such reforms. Telecom reforms are often accompanied by official discourse emphasizing benefits in price, quality of service, and access that consumers expect to receive; this dissertation analyzes the extent to which consumers consider that these expectations have been fulfilled. The importance of the consumers' interpretation of the public interest is also emphasized by the increased attention of regulatory agencies and public utility commissions worldwide to consumer protection and education in the new regulatory environment. The dissertation focuses on the case of Mexico, a country representative of the political, economic, and social challenges faced by nations with low and middle levels of telephone penetration. Using argumentation analysis, the study reconstructs the consumers' public interest argument about telecommunications reform in Mexico, based on a purposive sample of letters to the editor published in the nationally distributed Mexican newspaper El Financiero from 1991 to 2001. -
Exhibit 1 Articles of Organization
Exhibit I1 Articles of Organization raEFRIFIELI TO ISE A THVE ANLI Cr/I2REm ~/'B TAI/EN FROM AND COIMPARED I//ITM ~ _NDED oniel_LORIGINAL oNQN F_L_FILE q_Ilu TH_STIGRIS OF_I/FFICE ,.4,, ,:_ ,_', 2005 ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATIONORCiANTZATION OF SECPJ_TAt_¢SECRE iA/r/ OF STAilESTA'ltTQIO_ SC]_itl-_SUI II/I CAR_I_I /lHlnl .INt_INa CONTEI_R_._CONTKRRA. ULTRA BROAII)B_._U_I"]I)_BROAOBANII, IL,LLCLC Pursuant toto §33-44-204$33-44-204 of the 1976 South CarolinaCaroliua Code of Laws, as amended, thethe undersigned limitedlimited liability company hereby submits the following for the pm29osepurpose of amending itsits Articles of Organization. 1,1. The name of the company isis Conterra Ultra Broadband, LLC. 2. The articles of organization of the limited liability companycompauy were filed on April 20, 2001. 3. The Articles of Organization are amended as follows: (a) The management of the limited liabilityliabiTity company shall be vested in its managers and not itsits members,members. Article 6 of the ArticlesArticles of Organization is deleted in its entirety and replaced with thethe following: "The management of thethe limitedlimited liabilityliability company is vested in its managers. The Manager of thethe limitedlimited liability company effective as of the filing of these articles isis Stephen R. Leeolou and his address isis 5955 Carnegie Blvd., Suite 350, Charlotte, NC 28209." (b) The designated office of thethe limited liability company isis changed by deleting Article 2 in its entirety and replacingreplacing it with the following: "The designated officeoffice of the limited liability company in South Carolina is: 2 OfficeOflice Park Court, Suite 103, Columbia, South Carolina, 29223?'29223." (c) The registered agent for serviceservice of process and the street address of the agent for servicesservices of process in South Carolina is changed by deleting Article 3 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: "The registered agent for serviceseivice of process is National Registered Agents, Inc,Inc. -
Original San Francisco Attorneys at Law New York Los Angeles Lonoon Sacramento 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, Nw Brussels
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP ORIGINAL SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW NEW YORK LOS ANGELES LONOON SACRAMENTO 2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW BRUSSELS ORANGE COUNTY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006~1888 BEIJING PALO ALTO TELEPHONE (202) 887~1500 HONG KONG WALNUT CREEK TELEFACSIMILE (202) 887-0763 SINGAPORE DENVER TOKYO Writer's Direct Dial Number (202) 887-8750 August 3, 1999 By Overnight Courier Ms. Blanca S. Bayo Director, Division of Records and Reporting Florida Public Service Commission 2540 Shmard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0850 Re: Petition of the North American Numbering Plan Administrator on Behalf ofthe Florida Telecommunications Industry for Approval of a Relief Plan for the 305/786 Area Codes Dear Ms. Bayo: Enclosed for filing are an original and fifteen copies ofthe Petition of Lockheed Martin IMS ("LMIMS"), as the North American Numbering Plan Administrator, on Behalf of the Florida Telecommunications Industry, requesting approval of a relief plan for the 305/786 area codes. Please date-stamp the enclosed return copy as received and return it in the attached self-addressed stamped envelope. Under separate cover, I am also filing a letter from Ron Conners of LMIMS, for permission for the undersigned to act as a qualified representative on LMIMS' s behalf in this proceeding. Pursuant to this request, I would also ask that my name be added to the Commission's official service list for this proceeding. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Kimberly Wheeler Counsel for Lockheed Martin IMS ~\J CaeNlllt~erican Numbering Plan &:c L~ :6 NV £ld9l1fis~~or \I\i/A,W Enclosures O'fH· ~~V~~: '0 ~ 8(lIf9~ DOCUMENT Nrr~8ER -DATE dc-169152 o9 2 I 9 AUG -4 m ~~:.- PF IF:EPORTIHG Before the FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Tallahassee, FL 32399-0850 NANPA, on behalf ofthe Florida Telecommunications Industry, Docket No. -
Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions
COMMON LANGUAGE® Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions Telcordia Technologies Practice BR-751-100-112 Issue 2 April 1999 Proprietary — Licensed Material Possession or use of this material or any of the COMMON LANGUAGE Codes, Rules, and Information disclosed herein requires a written license agreement and is governed by its terms and conditions. For more information, visit www.commonlanguage.com/notices. An SAIC Company BR-751-100-112 TSP IAC Codes, EC names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions Issue 2 Copyright Page April 1999 COMMON LANGUAGE® Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions Prepared for Telcordia Technologies by: Lois Modrell Target audience: Telecommunications Service Providers This document replaces: BR-751-100-112, Issue 1, March 1998 Technical contact: Lois Modrell To obtain copies of this document, contact your company’s document coordinator or call 1-800-521-2673 (from the USA and Canada) or 1-732-699-5800 (all others), or visit our Web site at www.telcordia.com. Telcordia employees should call (732) 699-5802. Copyright © 1997-1999 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. Project Funding Year: 1999 Trademark Acknowledgments Telcordia is a trademark of Telcordia Technologies, Inc. COMMON LANGUAGE is a registered trademark of Telcordia Technologies. Proprietary — Licensed Material See confidentiality restrictions on title page. 2 BR-751-100-112 Issue 2 TSP IAC Codes, EC Names, Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions April 1999 Disclaimer Notice of Disclaimer This document is issued by Telcordia Technologies, Inc. to inform Telcordia customers of the Telcordia practice relating to COMMON LANGUAGE® Telecommunications Service Providers IAC Codes, Exchange Carrier Names - Company Codes - Telcordia and Regions. -
NENA Standard for 9-1-1 Call Processing
NENA Standard for 9-1-1 Call Processing Abstract: This NENA Standard document is intended to provide a model standing operating procedure (SOP) for the handling of calls received by Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) and to ensure consistency in the processing of emergency and non- emergency calls across jurisdictional boundaries. The document provides guidance to implementing the standard’s normative requirements as well as recommendations for those operational call handling areas that should be governed by local policy. NENA Standard for 9-1-1 Call Processing NENA-STA-020.1-2020 (combines 56-001, 56-005, 56,006 and 56-501) DSC Approval: 03/31/2020 PRC Approval: 04/10/2020 NENA Executive Board Approval: 04/16/2020 Next Scheduled Review Date: 10/16/2020 Prepared by: National Emergency Number Association (NENA) PSAP Operations Committee, 9-1-1 Call Processing Working Group Published by NENA Printed in USA © Copyright 2020 National Emergency Number Association, Inc. NENA Standard for 9-1-1 Call Processing NENA-STA-020.1-2020 (combines 56-001, 56-005, 56,006 and 56-501), April 16, 2020 1 Executive Overview This standard has been developed to facilitate the processing of 9-1-1 calls by Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) and to serve as a basis for the development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Use of this document standardizes the method of call handling across jurisdictional boundaries. This will provide consistency in the processing of emergency and non-emergency calls and improve service to the public. Over the course of the past decade, NENA published a number of Operational Standards and Information Documents that discuss the handling and processing of 9-1-1 calls.