JURI Report 11 (PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JURI Report 11 (PDF JURI REPORT November II 2013 Issue No 11 At this meeting Important dates November 25-26 – JURI This meeting of the Committee on Legal Affairs will commence on the afternoon of 25 November meeting 2013 with an exchange of views with the Lithuanian Presidency on the proposal for a Common European Sales Law. Parliament’s first-reading position on this flagship project is to be adopted in November 28 – Workshop on the December plenary, on the basis of the report prepared by co-rapporteurs Klaus-Heiner Lehne the training of legal and Luigi Berlinguer. practitioners: teaching EU law and judgecraft Later on in the afternoon, from 16.00, there will be an exchange of views with Commissioner Michel December 16-17 – JURI Barnier as part of the structured dialogue between Parliament and the Commission. António meeting Campinos, the President of OHIM, will then present a study entitled ‘European citizens and intellectual property: perception, awareness and behaviour’ which looks at the way citizens perceive major intellectual property issues. Subscription to JURI The morning of 26 November 2013 will start with a joint debate on the so-called omnibus package Report which concerns the use of the comitology procedure. In view of the end of the transitional period If you wish to receive the JURI conceded by the Lisbon Treaty, all remaining primary law which provides for the use of the newsletter, please send an regulatory procedure with scrutiny for the adoption of secondary legislation must be adapted to the email with your contact details new system of delegated and implementing acts under Articles 290 and 291 TFEU. József Szájer will and subject 'newsletter' to: be leading the first debate on all three proposals. juri- [email protected] Voting time will begin at 10.00 and include major votes on the trade mark package (Cecilia u Wikström) and on three own-initiative reports on delegated and implementing powers (József Szájer), the EU Justice Scoreboard (Tadeusz Zwiefka) and private copying levies (Françoise Castex), respectively. The committee will also hold a vote to confirm the result of negotiations with the Council on the very important file on the collective management of copyright and related rights and Subscription to JURI press the multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (Marielle releases Gallo). lega- [email protected] Following the votes, there will be debates on Alexandra Thein’s report on the proposal to increase the number of judges at the General Court and on Raffaele Baldassarre’s draft report on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups. Raffaele Credits and Baldassarre, who presided over the committee’s delegation to China in October, will report back on acknowledgements the meetings held with Chinese officials and institutions. European Parliament On the afternoon of 26 November, there will be an exchange of views on Eva Lichtenberger’s own- Committee on Legal Affairs initiative report on monitoring the application of EU law, following which the committee will meet in camera to consider disputes, the verification of credentials and immunity requests. Head of Unit: Robert Bray Responsible Administrator: Exchange of views with Michel Barnier Alexander Keys At this meeting, the committee will welcome Commissioner Barnier. This invitation is part of the annual JURI website structured dialogue with the European Commission on its work programme. Commissioner Barnier is responsible for two of the most important areas of competence in the JURI committee: company law and intellectual property rights. Watch LIVE Disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large companies and groups Watch the JURI Committee meetings live on the EP Procedure 2013/0110(COD) website or on EuroparlTV Basic doc COM(2013)0207 Rapporteur Raffaelle Baldassarre Administrator Leticia Zuleta de RE-Watch respons. Reales Past meetings are available via PRELIMINARY TIMETABLE EP multimedia library Consideration 25.-26.11.2013 of amend. Adoption JURI 17.12.2013 It is estimated that only a limited number of large companies (2 500 out of the total of 42 000 in Library news the EU) regularly publish non-financial information. The quality of the information disclosed varies, making it difficult for investors and stakeholders to understand and compare companies’ position The library website provides and performance. Furthermore, national requirements are significantly diverse, which adds to the direct access to many lack of clarity for companies and investors who operate across the Internal Market. documents and sources related The need to improve the transparency of the social and environmental information provided by to the work of the JURI companies in all sectors, in order to ensure a level playing field, has been acknowledged by the committee: Commission in the Single Market Act and was reiterated in the Communication ‘‘A renewed strategy 2011 – 2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility’’. Legal affairs policy area page The European Parliament, in its two resolutions on ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: accountable, transparent and responsible business behaviour and sustainable growth’ and ‘Corporate Social Case law portal Responsibility: promoting society’s interests and a route to sustainable and inclusive recovery’, acknowledged the need to increase transparency in this field and called the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal. Upcoming conferences and seminars Against this background, the legislative proposal presented by the Commission focuses on the following points: Useful databases 1) Non-financial information: the proposal will require certain large companies to include a statement in their Annual Report including material information relating to at least environmental, To learn more about the use of social, and employee-related matters, respect for human rights, anti-corruption and bribery these pages and databases, matters. register for training. The obligation will only apply to those companies where the average number of employees exceeds 500, and either a balance sheet total in excess of EUR 20 million or a net turnover of over In addition a team of EUR 40 million. information specialists is 2) Diversity: the amendment will require large listed companies to provide information on their always available to help you diversity policy, including aspects concerning age, gender, geographical diversity, and educational with specific requests. Do not and professional background. The information will be included in the corporate governance hesitate to ask the library. statement. After the presentation of the Commission proposal, Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC were repealed by Directive 2013/34/EC. In his draft report, Raffaele Baldassarre has tabled a series of technical amendments aimed at adapting the text to the Accounting Directive. The rapporteur essentially shares the orientation given by the Commission to the text. However, he goes beyond the proposal by specifying the information to be included in the non-financial statement. He has included a grandfather clause giving the members of the administrative, management, and supervisory bodies the possibility to decide whether or not to disclose such information if disclosure would be seriously prejudicial to the interests of the undertaking. Finally, and following the echoes of the Council conclusions of 22 May 2013, the rapporteur proposes to ask the Commission to consider, in the report referred to in Article 48 of Directive 2013/34/EC, whether to introduce an obligation for large undertakings and public-interest entities to publicly disclose, on an annual basis, a country-by-country report for each Member State and third country in which they operate, containing information on, as a minimum, the profit or loss before tax, the tax on profit or loss and public subsidies received. 172 amendments have been tabled. The committee will discuss them at this meeting. 2 The EU Justice Scoreboard – civil and administrative justice in the Member States Procedure 2013/2117(INI) Basic doc COM(2013)0160 Legal basis Rule 48 RoP Rapporteur Tadeusz Zwiefka Administrator respons. Alexander Keys PRELIMINARY TIMETABLE Consideration of 4.11.2013 amendments Adoption JURI 26.11.2013 Adoption Plenary January 2014 For the first time, the European Commission has issued a report which looks at the performance of national civil and administrative justice systems. The purpose of the exercise is to compare national justice systems, with a view to establishing where there may be shortcomings and where Member States may benefit from a transfer of best practices. As this is a sensitive area and national prerogatives must be respected, the Committee on Legal Affairs has decided to issue an implementation report concerning the Justice Scoreboard. As the goal of the exercise is to assess the quality, independence and efficiency of national justice systems, it is to be welcomed. Nevertheless, in his draft report, the rapporteur draws attention to certain considerations and limitations which should be borne in mind. The amendments tabled to the draft report are largely positively disposed towards the Commission initiative, but many seek to stress the importance of national differences in the justice field. At this meeting, the committee will vote on the report. The implementation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC The Committee should adopt the
Recommended publications
  • Minutes of the Sitting of 9 September 2013
    6.12.2013 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 357 E/1 Monday 9 September 2013 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2013-2014 SESSION Sittings of 9 to 12 September 2013 STRASBOURG MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 9 SEPTEMBER 2013 (2013/C 357 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Tribute . 2 3. Statements by the President . 3 4. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 3 5. Composition of Parliament . 3 6. Verification of credentials . 4 7. Request for the waiver of parliamentary immunity . 4 8. Requests for the defence of parliamentary immunity . 4 9. Composition of committees and delegations . 4 10. Corrigenda (Rule 216) . 5 11. Signature of acts adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure (Rule 74) . 5 12. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council . 6 13. Questions for oral answer (submission) . 6 14. Delegated acts (Rule 87a) . 6 C 357 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 6.12.2013 Monday 9 September 2013 Contents (continued) Page 15. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 7 16. Action taken on Parliament's resolutions . 8 17. Petitions . 8 18. Documents received . 11 19. Order of business . 15 20. Property consequences of registered partnerships * - Matrimonial property regimes * (debate) 17 21. Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and right to communicate upon arrest ***I (debate) . 18 22. Fuel quality directive and renewable energy directive ***I (debate) . 18 23. Making the internal energy market work - Micro-generation (debate) . 19 24. Equal pay for male and female workers (debate) .
    [Show full text]
  • En En ***I Report
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0034/2013 7.2.2013 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (COM(2011)0895 – C7-0007/2012– 2011/0439(COD)) Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Rapporteur: Marc Tarabella RR\926628EN.doc PE483.470v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_COD_1amCom Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act In amendments by Parliament, amendments to draft acts are highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the draft act which may require correction when the final text is prepared – for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a language version. Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned. The heading for any amendment to an existing act that the draft act seeks to amend includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Passages in an existing act that Parliament wishes to amend, but that the draft act has left unchanged, are highlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in such passages are indicated thus: [...]. PE483.470v03-00 2/296 RR\926628EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION................................
    [Show full text]
  • En En Report
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0122/2014 17.2.2014 REPORT on evaluation of justice in relation to criminal justice and the rule of law (2014/2006(INI)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Kinga Göncz RR\1019831EN.doc PE527.913v02-00 EN United in diversityEN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION.............................................3 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ......................................................8 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.......................................................................11 PE527.913v02-00 2/11 RR\1019831EN.doc EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on evaluation of justice in relation to criminal justice and the rule of law (2014/2006(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Articles 2, 6 and 7 thereof, – having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in particular Articles 70, 85, 258, 259 and 260 thereof, – having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, – having regard to Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, – having regard to the Commission communication of 27 March 2013 entitled ‘The EU Justice Scoreboard – A tool to promote effective justice and growth’ (COM(2013)0160), – having regard to the letter of 6 March 2013 sent by the foreign affairs ministers of Germany, Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands to Commission President José Barroso calling for the establishment
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • List of Meps (Provisional)
    List of MEPs Germany: CDU/CSU (EPP): Ingeborg Grässle (sort.), Monika Hohlmeier, Elisabeth Jeggle (sort.), Christa Klass (sort.), Angelika Niebler (sort.), Doris Pack (sort.), Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl (sort.), Brigit Schnieber-Jastram, Renate Sommer (sort.), Sabine Verheyen, Anja Weisgerber (sort.), SPD (PASD) : Evelyne Gebhardt (sort.), Jutta Haug (sort.), Petra Kammerevert, Constanze Krehl (sort.), Dagmar Reichenbach (sort.), Ulrike Rodust (sort.), Birgit Sippel, Jutta Steinruck, Barbara Weiler (sort.), Kerstin Westphal, FDP (ALDE) : Nadja Hirsch, Silvana Koch-Mehrin (sort.), Gesine Meissner, Britta Reimers, Alexandra Thein Grünen (greens): Franziska Katharina Brantner, Rebecca Harms (sort.), Franziska Maria Keller, Barbara Elisabeth Lochbihler, Heidemarie-Rose Rühle (sort.), Elisabeth Schroedter (sort.), Helga Trüpel (sort.) Die Linke (GUE) : Cornelia Ernst, Sabine Lösing, Sabine Wils, Gabriele Zimmer (sort.) Austria: ÖVP (EEP): Elisabeth Köstinger, Hella Ranner, SPÖ (PASD): Karin Kadenbach, Evelyn Regner Grüne (Greens): Evelin Lichtenberger (sort.), Ulrike Lunacek, Liste Hans-Peter Martin (NI) : Angelika Werthmann Belgium: CDH (EPP) : Anne Delvaux CD&V (EPP) : Marianne Thyssen (sort.) PS (PASD) : Véronique de Keyser (sort.) SP.A (PASD) : Kathleen Van Brempt MR (ALDE): Frédérique Ries (sort.) ECOLO -greens : Isabelle Durant VLD (ALDE) : Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck (sort.) N-VA (Greens) : Frieda Brepoels Bulgaria: GERB (EPP) : Iliana Ivanova, Rumyana Jeleva (sort.), Maria Nedeltcheva, Blue coalition (EPP) : Nadejda Mihaïlova BSP (PASD)
    [Show full text]
  • 010877/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt Am 03/02/14
    010877/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt am 03/02/14 COUNCIL OF Brussels, 3 February 2014 THE EUROPEAN UNION 5661/14 PE-RE 2 NOTE Subject : RESOLUTIONS, DECISIONS AND OPINIONS adopted by the European Parliament at its part-session in Strasbourg from 9 to 12 December 2013 At the above mentioned part-session, the European Parliament adopted 62 acts as follows: - 43 legislative resolutions - 19 resolutions Acts of particular relevance to the Council1: 1. Codecision procedure First reading (a) Justice Programme 2014-2020 (A7-0396/2013 - Rapporteur: Luigi Berlinguer, Philip Claeys) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0519 (b) Rights and Citizenship Programme 2014-2020 (A7-0397/2013 - Rapporteur: Kinga Göncz) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0520 (c) Autonomous trade preferences for Moldova (A7-0422/2013 - Rapporteur: Iuliu Winkler) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0521 1 To consult the resolution, Ctrl + click on the hyperlink (P7 reference) contained in the text concerned. You will be directed to the resolution as published on the European Parliament's Website. 5661/14 ID/aa 1 DRI EN (d) North-East Atlantic: deep-sea stocks and fishing in international waters (A7-0395/2013 - Rapporteur: Kriton Arsenis) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0539 (e) Civil protection mechanism (A7-0003/2013 - Rapporteur: Elisabetta Gardini) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0540 (f) Credit agreements relating to residential property (A7-0202/2012 - Rapporteur: Antolín Sánchez Presedo) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0541 (g) Imports of rice from Bangladesh (A7-0304/2013 - Rapporteur: Paul Murphy ) P7_TA-PROV(2013)0542 (h) Timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances (A7-0046/2013
    [Show full text]
  • 0213 1 PÖYTÄKIRJA Ylimääräinen Kokous 13. Helmikuuta 2012 Klo
    EUROOPAN PARLAMENTTI 2009 - 2014 Ulkoasiainvaliokunta AFET_PV(2012)0213_1 PÖYTÄKIRJA Ylimääräinen kokous 13. helmikuuta 2012 klo 19.30–21.00 STRASBOURG Toinen varapuheenjohtaja Ioan Mircea Paşcu avasi kokouksen maanantaina 13. helmikuuta 2012 klo 19.40. 1. Esityslistan hyväksyminen AFET_OJ (2012)0213_1v01-00 Esityslista hyväksyttiin. 2. Puheenjohtajan ilmoitukset 3. Keskustelu Lähi-idässä olevien palestiinalaispakolaisten YK:n avustus- ja työelimelle (UNRWA) vasta nimitetyn Länsirannan ja Gazan alueen EU:n edustajan John Gatt-Rutterin kanssa Puheenvuorot: Ioannis Kasoulides, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Robert Atkins, Franziska Katharina Brantner, Margrete Auken, Ana Gomes, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Ivo Vajgl, Helmut Scholz, Véronique De Keyser, Alexandra Thein, Sarah Ludford, Jelko Kacin. 4. Muut asiat 5. Seuraavan kokouksen aika ja paikka 15. helmikuuta 2012 klo 14.00–15.00 Strasbourg *** Kokous päättyi klo 20.45. * * * PV\892448FI.doc PE483.514v01-00 FI Moninaisuudessaan yhtenäinen FI ПРИСЪСТВЕН ЛИСТ/LISTA DE ASISTENCIA/PREZENČNÍ LISTINA/DELTAGERLISTE/ ANWESENHEITSLISTE/KOHALOLIJATE NIMEKIRI/ΚΑΤΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΩΝ/RECORD OF ATTENDANCE/ LISTE DE PRÉSENCE/ELENCO DI PRESENZA/APMEKLĒJUMU REĢISTRS/DALYVIŲ SĄRAŠAS/JELENLÉTI ÍV/ REĠISTRU TA' ATTENDENZA/PRESENTIELIJST/LISTA OBECNOŚCI/LISTA DE PRESENÇAS/LISTĂ DE PREZENŢĂ/ PREZENČNÁ LISTINA/SEZNAM NAVZOČIH/LÄSNÄOLOLISTA/DELTAGARLISTA Бюро/Mesa/Předsednictvo/Formandskabet/Vorstand/Juhatus/Προεδρείο/Bureau/Ufficio di presidenza/Prezidijs/Biuras/Elnökség/ Prezydium/Birou/Predsedníctvo/Predsedstvo/Puheenjohtajisto/Presidiet
    [Show full text]
  • Lehne 120523 Accounting Directive
    Mr. Klaus-Heiner Lehne Chair of the Committee on Legal Affairs European Parliament Bât. Altiero Spinelli – 10E205 Rue Wiertz 60 B - 1047 BRUSSELS 23 May 2012 Ref.: FRP/PRJ/SKU/SRO Dear Mr. Lehne, Re: FEE audit related comments on the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) Draft Reports dated 28 March 2012 and 8 May 2012 on the EC proposal for the Accounting Directive – continued Recently, we provided you with two letters dated 24 February and 23 April 2012, respectively and indicated we would write a separate letter on audit related matters. FEE hereby provides comments on some of the amendments related to audit currently discussed in JURI regarding the EC proposal for the Accounting Directive1 . We believe that these issues and our comments thereon are also relevant to other European Parliament Committees dealing with the EC proposals for the Accounting Directive. We hope our comments, based on the experience and expertise of European accountants, may be of help to the Members of the European Parliament when considering these important matters. Should you wish to discuss any of these points in more details, please contact our CEO, Olivier Boutellis-Taft ([email protected]). Sincerely, Philip Johnson President 1 EC proposal for the Directive on the Annual Financial Statements, Consolidated Financial Statements and Related Reports of Certain Type of Undertakings Avenue d’Auderghem 22-28 • B-1040 Brussels • Tel: +32 (0)2 285 40 85 • Fax: +32 (0)2 231 11 12 • [email protected] • www.fee.be Association Internationale reconnue par Arrêté Royal en date du 30 décembre 1986 Page 2 of 6 Cc: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • 10-08 MINUTES Meeting of 8 October 2009, from 14.00 to 16.00
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Legal Affairs Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee on Constitutional Affairs JURI_PV(2009)10-08 MINUTES Meeting of 8 October 2009, from 14.00 to 16.00 BRUSSELS The meeting, chaired by Juan Fernando López Aguilar, started at 14h15 in the presence of the Council, the Commission and representatives from national Parliaments. 1. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. 2. Chairman’s announcements The Chairman announced that a Joint Parliamentary Meeting on the Stockholm Programme would take place in the European Parliament in Brussels on 16 and 17 November. 3. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen - Stockholm programme Presentation of the draft resolution by the rapporteurs and general discussion The following took the floor: the three co-rapporteurs, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Carlo Casini and Luigi Berlinguer, to open and to close the debate; Hans Nilsson for the Council Presidency, Jean-Louis De Brouwer for the European Commission, Simon Busuttil, Claude Moraes, Andrew Duff, Diana Wallis, Mechtild Dyckmans (German Parliament), Jan Philipp Albrecht, Mario Borghezio, Hélène Flautre, Ryszard Kalisz (Polish Parliament), Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Monica Luisa Macovei, Alexander Alvaro, Andrew Henry William Brons, Krisztina Morvai and Íñigo Méndez de Vigo. Decision on deadline for tabling amendments PV\793884EN.doc PE430.394v01-00 EN United in diversity EN The deadline for amendments was set at 22 October. Adoption of a draft oral question to the Council and the Commission (possibly) Both draft oral questions were adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-23 MINUTES Meeting of 23 February 2010 LUXEMBOURG
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Legal Affairs JURI_PV(2010)02-23 MINUTES Meeting of 23 February 2010 LUXEMBOURG, Court of Justice of the European Union The visit to the Court of Justice of the European Union took place on Wednesday 23 February 2010, and was led by the Chairman of the Committee on Legal Affairs, Klaus-Heiner Lehne. At 12:00 a roundtable took place with Members of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (CST) led by its President, Paul Mahoney. The following spoke: Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Diana Wallis, Paul Mahoney (President of the CST), Sean Van Raepenbusch (Judge, CST), Horstpeter Kreppel (Judge, CST), Haris Tagaras (Judge, CST), Alexandra Thein, and Stéphane Gervasoni (Judge, CST). The Committee then lunched at the Court together with the Presidents and Members of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal. At 14:35, a roundtable took place with Members of the General Court (GC), led by its President, Marc Jaeger. The following spoke: Marc Jaeger, Josef Azizi (Judge, GC), Nicholas Forwood (Judge, GC), Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Diana Wallis, Marc Jaeger (President, GC), Emmanuel Coulon (Registrar, GC), Marielle Gallo, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Arjen Meij (Judge, GC), Santiago Soldevila Fragoso (Judge, GC), Zbigniew Ziobro and Mihalis Vilaras (Judge, GC). At 16:10, a roundtable took place with Members of the Court of Justice (ECJ), led by its President, Vassilios Skouris. The following spoke: Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Vassilios Skouris, Gerald Häfner, Koen Lenaerts (Judge, ECJ), Jean-Claude Bonichot (Judge, ECJ), Antonio Tizzano (Judge, ECJ), Zbigniew Ziobro, Diana Wallis and Jan Philipp Albrecht.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Motion for a Resolution on Iraq: the Plight of Minority Groups
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting 13.3.2013 B7-0147/2013 } B7-0148/2013 } B7-0149/2013 } Dear Members, Please find attached the final version of the JMR on Iraq: the plight of minority groups, in particular the Iraqi Turkmen, as tabled yesterday. B7-0150/2013 } B7-0151/2013 } RC1 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rules 122(5) and 110(4), of the Rules of Procedure replacing the motions by the following groups: PPE (B7-0147/2013) S&D (B7-0148/2013) Verts/ALE (B7-0149/2013) ECR (B7-0150/2013) ALDE (B7-0151/2013) on Iraq: the plight of minority groups, including the Iraqi Turkmen (2013/2562(RSP)) José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Krzysztof Lisek, Elmar Brok, Mario Mauro, Esther de Lange, Cristian Dan Preda, Bernd Posselt, Tunne Kelam, Roberta Angelilli, Filip Kaczmarek, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Sergio Paolo Francesco Silvestris, Giovanni La Via, Monica Luisa Macovei, Sari Essayah, Philippe Boulland, Jean Roatta, Elena Băsescu, RC\930283EN.doc PE507.400v01-00 } PE507.401v01-00 } PE507.402v01-00 } PE507.403v01-00 } PE507.404v01-00 } RC1 EN United in diversity EN Petri Sarvamaa, Eduard Kukan, Zuzana Roithová, Bogusław Sonik on behalf of the PPE Group Véronique De Keyser, Silvia Costa, Maria Eleni Koppa, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Pino Arlacchi, Mitro Repo on behalf of the S&D Group Metin Kazak, Marietje Schaake, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Norica Nicolai, Leonidas Donskis, Louis Michel, Marielle de Sarnez. Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Alexandra Thein, Robert Rochefort, Phil Bennion, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Sarah Ludford, Edward
    [Show full text]