The Navajo Country

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Navajo Country DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 380 THE NAVAJO COUNTRY DGRAPHIC AND HYDROGRAPHIC RECONNAISSANCE OF ! PARTS OF ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH BY HERBERT E. GREGORY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 380 THE NAVAJO COUNTRY - A GEOGRAPHIC AND HYDROGRAPHIC RECONNAISSANCE OF PARTS OF ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH BY HERBERT E. GREGORY Water Resources Branch, Geological Stuvey, Box 31 06, Capitol Station Oklahoma Ciiy, Okk WASHINGTON .GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OP THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED PBOM THE SUPERINTENDENT OP DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, *D. C. AT 80 CENTS PER COPY . CONTENTS. INTBODTJCTTON_____ - ' 9 A personal word '- 9 History and scope of investigation_ 9 ^Acknowledgments . - j. 10 Suggestions to travelers ___ . i IT PART I. Geography___^__ ____ 13 Location and extent of the reservations _ 13 Note on the map ___ _ _ 14 Historical sketch _______ i 15 Topographic outline _ 21 Geographic provinces I <. 22 Basis of subdivision. __i _ 22 Button Plateau i. _ 23 Chaco Plateau__________ _ - _____ 24 Chuska Valley ___________ 24 Manuelito Plateau 26 Chuska Mountains_________ ____ _ 27 Nomenclature - _ 27 Eastern edge ____ _ 1_ 28 Western edge___"________ ________ __ 26 The mountain top _ ____ 29 Carrizo Mountain__________ __________ 30 Gothic Mesas____________ _________ 31 San Juan Valley________ 31 Black Creek Valley___________________________ 32 Defiance Plateau.___________ _______ 34 Chinle and Pueblo Colorado valleys ___________ 36 Hopi Buttes______________ _ __________ 37 Tusayan Washes _ __ 38 Moenkopi Plateau _ 39 Black Mesa___ __ ____ ____ 40 Kaibito Plateau ____________ _____________ 41 Painted Desert _ _ 42 Shato Plateau ______________________________ 43 Rainbow Plateau__________ ______________ 44 Navajo Mountain __ . : ______ 45 Segi Mesas__________._________________'____ 47 Monument Valley _________ "_______________ 48 Climate__________________ _____'________ 49 General conditions __ ___ ____________ 49 Precipitation _____________ T _______________ 50 Records-,_____________ _ _____________ 50 Geographic distribution ___ _____i_______ 59 Variation from year to year_ _ _____________ 60 Seasonal distribution _______ _____________ 61 Character of rainstorms_____________________ 63 Temperature _______ ___ _____________ 63 Wind______________________________________ , 67 3 4 CONTENTS. i PART I. Geography Cpntinued. Page. Soil-_________________i__l__________________ 68 Flora _ _____________________________ 71 General relations ________________________:___ . 71 Forests ______________________;._________ 74 Fauna _______________________________________ 74 Mineral wealth________________________________ 75 Population and industries__________________________ - 76 Geologic sketch _______________________________ 77 Literature ______________:_________________-__ 78 Stratigraphy ________________________________ 78 Pre-Cambrian (?) __________________________ '78 Pennsylvanian ____________________________ 78 Permian (?)______________________________ 78 Triassic ___________________'____________ 79 Jurassic ____________________________:____ 79 Jurassic (?)______________________________ 79 Cretaceous _____________________________ 80 Tertiary ________________________________ 80 Quaternary ______________________________ 80 Structure __________________________________ 80 Geologic history_______________________________ 82 PART II. Surface waters____________ ________________ . 85 Streams _______________________________ ______ 85 Master streams of the region______________________ 85 Through-flowing streams_________________________ 87 Intermittent streams ___________________________ 87 Moenkopi Creek____^______________________ 87 Black Creek _______________________T____ 88 Pueblo Colorado Wash________________________ 89 Chinle drainage system______________________ 89 Streams tributary to Chuska Valley- _____ _______ 91 Additional streams_______ ____ __-_______ 92 Drainage obstructed by dunes_________ _______ 92 Ephemeral streams______ _____ _ _ _ _ 92 Summary table of streams_____________________ 93 Factors influencing stream flow_____-__________ 95 Precipitation _________ __ _ 95 Amount _____________ 95 Distribution in time__:______ _ _ - 96 Variation throughout the year____________ ____ 96 Variation from year to year_ - 97 Violent showers of short duration_______ _ _ 97 Evaporation _ _ 97 Soil ______________________' _ __ - 98 Vegetation __________ 99 Erosion of the valley fill_________________-_____ 100 Work of the wind_____________ _ ,. 100 Fluctuation in stream volume______-u___ '. 101 Utilization of streams_______________-_____ 102 Nature of the problems to be studied _ 102 Flood irrigation ____,__:_______ _ 103 Irrigation by diversion ___ 105 Area irrigated _________ _ 105 Projects developed by white men____ ^105 Projects awaiting development____-_ 106 CONTENTS. ' 5 PAET II. Surface waters Continued. Utilization of streams Continued. Page. Irrigation by storage__________________________ 107 General conditions ________________________ 107 Government projects'_______________________ 109 Red Lake ___________________________ 109 Reservoir Canyon______________________ 109 Wheatfields reservoir____________________ 109 Ganado reservoir_:_^___________________ 110 Projects awaiting development__________________. Ill Leupp reservoir_________________________ x 111 Additional prospects_________________________ 112 Quartzite Canyon________________________ 112 Buell Park____________________________ 112 Lokasakad ______________________:_____ 112 Marsh Pass region_______________________ 112 Segihatsosi __________________________ 112 Miscellaneous __________________________ 113 Storage of surface water for stock________________.___ 113 Essential conditions ____________________________ 113 Small reservoirs or tanks______________________ 114 Sites ___________________________________ 114 Dams ___________________________________ 114 . Wasteways _____________________________ 116 Water power_________________________________ 116 Lakes ____________________________i__________ 116 Lakes of the Chuska Mountains____________________ 116 Tolani lakes________________________________ 117 Lakes formed by drifting sand_____________________ 117 Ephemeral lakes______________________________ 118 Other lakes_________________________________ 118 Utilization of lakes____________________________ 118 Water holes in the washes_________________________ 119 Direct utilization of rainfall_________________________ 119 General conditions____________________________ 119 . Water catches________________________________ 120 PAET III. Ground water______________________________ 123 Source of the ground water__________________________ 123 Ground-water reservoir _ , 124 Nature of the reservoir_______ __ ____ _ 124 Capacity of the reservoir______ ____ __ __ 125 Variation in porosity____ _ _ ____ __,._ 125 Bedrock _____________ ____-___________ 125 ' Unconsolidated deposits___ ___ ___ ___ 126 Method of filling the ground-water reservoir______________ 126 Directly from the rainfall________ .___^ __ 126 Percolation from stream channels__ _ _ 127 Percolation from flood waters____________ ___ 127 Depletion of the reservoir ___ _ 127 Processes of depletion ___ _ 127 Evaporation from the ground__________ ^ 129 Evaporation of springs and seeps__ _ 129 The water table_________________ _ 129 Quality of ground water__________ _ 131 Artesian water _ _ _ 131 6 v CONTENTS. PABT III. Ground water Continued. Page. Springs _____________________________^_____ 132 Distribution and character_______________ _ 132. Springs in unconsolidated deposits ___ _ :.__ 133 General relations________.-_____ _ 133 Methods of improvement__________ ____ 134 Springs between alluvium and bedrock___ 136 General relations______________ _-_-_ 136 Method of development___________ 136 Springs between rock strata_________ 137 ( General relations______________ - __ 137 Springs of the Hopi Buttes province__ _ 139 Springs of Chuska Mountain____ __________ 140 Methods of improvement__________ ____ 141 Springs within a stratum____ _____ _______ 142 Fault springs ________________________:_______ 143 Springs of the Tuba district______________________ 143 General relations______________ ___ 144 Origin of the springs____-_______________________ _ 144 Methods of improvement_________________ _ 146 Spring records ___________________________:___ __ 147 Wells________________________________________ 159 General conditions_____________________________ 159 Wells in unconsolidated sediments___________________ 160 Character of the sediments____________________ 160 Location of wells__________________________ 161 Wells along the axes of the washes____________ 161 Wells on^lluvial mesas or bench lands__________ 162 Wells in'high valleys______________________ 163 Wells in the Tusayan washes__________________ 164 Construction of wells________________________ 166 The problems__________________________ 166 Dug wells____________________________ 167 Driven wells __________________.________ 170 Drilled wells __________________________ 171 Wells in bedrock______________________L_________ 173 Artesian wells________________________________ 176 Essential conditions__________________________ 176 Wells in unconsolidat,ed deposits___________,____ 177 Wells in bedrock____________________________
Recommended publications
  • Narbonapass.Pdf
    FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG 1 FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG, FROM GALLUP TO GAMERCO, YAH-TA-HEY, WINDOW ROCK, FORT DEFIANCE, NAVAJO, TODILTO PARK, CRYSTAL, NARBONA PASS, SHEEP SPRINGS, TOHATCHI AND GALLUP SPENCER G. LUCAS, STEVEN C. SEMKEN, ANDREW B. HECKERT, WILLIAM R. BERGLOF, First-day Road Log GRETCHEN HOFFMAN, BARRY S. KUES, LARRY S. CRUMPLER AND JAYNE C. AUBELE ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ ������ ������ �������� Distance: 141.8 miles ������� Stops: 5 ���� ������ ������ SUMMARY ������ �� ������ �� ����� �� The first day’s trip takes us around the southern �� �� flank of the Defiance uplift, back over it into the �� southwestern San Juan Basin and ends at the Hogback monocline at Gallup. The trip emphasizes Mesozoic— especially Jurassic—stratigraphy and sedimentation in NOTE: Most of this day’s trip will be conducted the Defiance uplift region. We also closely examine within the boundaries of the Navajo (Diné) Nation under Cenozoic volcanism of the Navajo volcanic field. a permit from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department. Stop 1 at Window Rock discusses the Laramide Persons wishing to conduct geological investigations Defiance uplift and introduces Jurassic eolianites near on the Navajo Nation, including stops described in this the preserved southern edge of the Middle-Upper guidebook, must first apply for and receive a permit Jurassic depositional basin. At Todilto Park, Stop 2, from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department, P.O. we examine the type area of the Jurassic Todilto For- Box 1910, Window Rock, Arizona, 86515, 928-871- mation and discuss Todilto deposition and economic 6587. Sample collection on Navajo land is forbidden. geology, a recurrent theme of this field conference. From Todilto Park we move on to the Green Knobs diatreme adjacent to the highway for Stop 3, and then to Stop 4 at the Narbona Pass maar at the crest of the Chuska Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • Map 3.1 Travel Management Plan
    TOADLENA SHEEP SPRINGS GREAT BENDTHE PILLAR 3 NW THE PILLAR 3 NE TANNER LAKE PRETTY ROCKPUEBLO BONITO NW B836108 B636108 B536108 B436108 KIMBETO LYBROOK NW LYBROOK COUNSELORTANCOSA WINDMILL B336108 B236108 B136108 FIVE LAKES CANYON NEREGINA GALLINA ARROYA DEL AGUAYOUNGSVILLE CANONES ABIQUIU Y 134 B836107 B736107 B636107 B536107 B436107 MEDANALES LYDEN VELARDE TRAMPAS PENASCO TRES RITOS CERRO VISTA CHACON W B336107 B136107 B836106 B736106 B636106 B536106 E H B436106 B336106 B236106 B136106 B836105 B736105 B636105 B536105 B436105 B336105 T TOADLENA FIVE LAKES CANYON NW U STA 8 S 6 SONSELA BUTTES B236107 CRYSTAL WASHINGTON PASS S H Y A136109 NASCHITTI CHACO CANYON T W W A836108 THE PILLAR 3 SW A H A736108 THE PILLAR 3 SE Y E A636108 LA VIDA MISSION T T E A436108 PUEBLO BONITO HW 8 A A336108 FIRE ROCK WELL Y 44 ABIQUIU 4 TAOS GREY HILL SPRING T A236108 A836107 LYBROOK SE MULE DAM DEER MESA A636107 TAYLOR RANCH CUBA S A536108 KIN KLIZHIN RUINS A536107 A436107 A336107 NACIMIENTO PEAK JAROSA POLVADERA PEAK SARGENT RANCH A236107 A836106 VALLECITOS CHILI SAN JUAN PUEBLO CHIMAYO TRUCHAS EL VALLE JICARITA PEAK HOLMAN A136108 A736106 A636106 A436106 COMANCHE PEAK A736107 ARROYO CHIJUILLITA A336106 A236106 A136106 A836105 A736105 A636105 A536105 A436105 S A336105 CERRO DEL GRANT 6 A136107 7 T A536106 Y A W T STATE H HWY STAT E E BUELL PARK TODILTO PARK 1 H CHUSKA PEAK 26 W H135109 H835108 EAR ROCK Y H735108 RED LAKE WELL 5 H535108 MILK LAKE NOSE ROCK 18 COYOTE CANYON NW H335108 SEVEN LAKES NEPUEBLO PINTADO STANDING ROCK NW H235108 H135108 STAR LAKE
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 the Enduring Hopi
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law History, Department of September 2008 Chapter 7 The Enduring Hopi Peter Iverson Arizona State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hopination Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons Iverson, Peter, "Chapter 7 The Enduring Hopi" (2008). HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law. 16. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hopination/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in HOPI NATION: Essays on Indigenous Art, Culture, History, and Law by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CHAPTER 7 The Enduring Hopi Peter Iverson “What then is the meaning of the tricentennial observance? It is a reaffirmation of continuity and hope for the collective Hopi future.” The Hopi world is centered on and around three mesas in northeastern Arizona named First, Sec- ond, and Third. It is at first glance a harsh and rugged land, not always pleasing to the untrained eye. Prosperity here can only be realized with patience, determination, and a belief in tomorrow.1 For over 400 years, the Hopis have confronted the incursion of outside non-Indian societies. The Spanish entered Hopi country as early as 1540. Then part of Francisco Vásquez de Coronado’s explor- ing party invaded the area with characteristic boldness and superciliousness. About twenty Spaniards, including a Franciscan missionary, confronted some of the people who resided in the seven villages that now comprise the Hopi domain, and under the leadership of Pedro de Tovar, the Spanish over- came Hopi resistance, severely damaging the village of Kawaiokuh, and winning unwilling surrender.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS
    2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization 1 Urban and Community Forestry 2016 Arizona Shade Tree Planting Prioritization ATLAS Planning Maps for the Department of Forestry and Fire Management 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas About the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization Atlas This collection of maps summarizes the results of the 2016 Shade Tree Planting Prioritization analysis of the Urban and Community Forestry Program (UCF) at the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management (DFFM). The purpose of the analysis was to assess existing urban forests in Arizona’s communities and identify shade tree planting needs. The spatial analysis, based on U.S. Census Block Group polygons, generated seven sub-indices for criteria identified by an expert panel: population density, lack of canopy cover, low-income, traffic proximity, sustainability, air quality, and urban heat effect. The seven sub-indices were combined into one Shade Tree Planting Priority Index and further summarized into a Shade Tree Planting Priority Ranking. The resulting reports, maps, and GIS data provide compiled information that can be easily used for identifying areas for strategic shade tree planting within a community or across Arizona’s major cities and towns. These maps provide limited detail for conveying the scale and depth of the analysis results which – for more detailed use – are best explored through the analysis report, interactive maps, and the GIS data available through the UCF Program webpage at https://forestryandfire.az.gov/forestry-community-forestry/urban-community-forestry/projects. Note: At the time of publication, two known analysis area errors have been identified. A few of Safford’s incorporated easements were not captured correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grants Uranium District, New Mexico: Update on Source, Deposition, and Exploration 1
    The Grants Uranium District, New Mexico: Update on Source, Deposition, and Exploration 1 VIRGINIA T. M cLEMORE 2 1. Manuscript received September 2, 2010; Accepted November 28, 2010 2. NM Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, 87801; [email protected] ABSTRACT More than 340 million pounds (lbs) of U 3O8 have been produced from the Grants uranium deposits in New Mexico between 1948 and 2002, and at least 403 million lbs of U 3O8 remain as unmined resources. The Grants district is one of the largest uranium provinces in the world. The Grants district extends from east of Laguna to west of Gallup in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico. Three types of sandstone uranium deposits are recognized: tabular, redistributed (roll-front, fault- related), and remnant-primary. The tabular deposits formed during the Jurassic Westwater Canyon time. Subsequently, oxidizing solutions moved downdip, modifying tabular deposits into redistributed roll- front and fault-related deposits. Evidence, including age dates and geochemistry of the uranium deposits, suggests that redistributed deposits could have been formed shortly after deposition in the early Creta - ceous and from a second oxidation front during the mid-Tertiary. The source of uranium is important in understanding how the Grants deposits formed. Two possible sources exist: 1) the Zuni Mountains, which lie south of the district and consist of a Proterozoic granitic highland enriched in uranium with as much as 11 parts per million, and with high heat flow; and 2) vol - canic rocks erupted from a Jurassic arc volcanism, which formed southwest of the San Juan Basin, and deposited ash over much of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico
    Hydrogeology of the Chinle Wash Watershed, Navajo Nation Arizona, Utah and New Mexico Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Roessel, Raymond J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 19:50:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191379 HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE CHINLE WASH WATERSHED, NAVAJO NATION, ARIZONA, UTAH AND NEW MEXICO by Raymond J. Roessel A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN HYDROLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1994 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. July 22, 2021 Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015 Effective March 17, 2021 The federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires states and federally recognized Indian tribes to adopt water quality standards in order to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's Waters" (CWA, 1988). The attached WQS document is in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with the exception of the following provisions. Navajo Nation’s previously approved criteria for these provisions remain the applicable for CWA purposes. The “Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2015” (NNSWQS 2015) made changes amendments to the “Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality Standards 2007” (NNSWQS 2007). For federal Clean Water Act permitting purposes, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) must approve these changes to the NNSWQS 2007 which are found in the NNSWQS 2015. The USEPA did not approve of three specific changes which were made to the NNSWQS 2007 and are in the NNSWQS 2015. (October 15, 2020 Letter from USEPA to Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency). The three specific changes which USEPA did not accept are: 1) Aquatic and Wildlife Habitat Designated Use - Suspended Solids Changes (NNSWQS 2015 Section 207.E) The suspended soils standard for aquatic and wildlife habitat designated use was changed to only apply to flowing (lotic) surface waters and not to non-flowing (lentic) surface waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Tse' Nikani Draft Corridor Management
    Tse'nikani Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan DRAFT August 2013 Introduction Purpose Tse’nikani Scenic Byway was established The purpose of a byway corridor as an Arizona Byway in 2005 and given the management plan is not to create more name Tse’nikani ‘Flat Mesa Rock’ Scenic regulations or taxes. Rather, a corridor Byway. management plan documents the goals, strategies, and responsibilities for preserving and enhancing the byway’s most Byway Description valuable qualities. Promoting tourism can Tse’nikani Scenic Byway, U.S. Highway be one target, but so are issues of safety or (US) 191 is located in northeast Arizona preserving historic or cultural structures. in Apache County and entirely within the 160 The Corridor Management Plan can: Navajo Nation. The portion of US 191 that 1 160 Tse’nikani is a designated Arizona Scenic Byway is Scenic Road ◊ document community interest from Milepost (MP) 467.0, south of Many ◊ document existing conditions and Farms, to MP 510.4, at the junction with history US 160, near Mexican Water. The highway ◊ guide enhancement and safety is the primary route to access Canyon de improvement projects ARIZONA Chelly National Monument, about 13 miles mexico new south of the south end of the byway. ◊ promote partnerships for conservation Chinle and enhancement activities US 191 is a two-lane asphalt paved road for ◊ suggest resources for project development almost its entire length with no median and programs and few left-turn lanes. The roadway is ◊ promote coordination between residents, managed by the Arizona Department communities, and agencies of Transportation (ADOT) through the 264 Ganado ◊ support application for National Scenic Navajo Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tombstone, Arizona Shippensburg University
    Trent Otis © 2011 Applied GIS with Dr. Drzyzga Tombstone, Arizona Shippensburg University Photo © dailyventure.com. Photographer unknown. Tombstone and the Old West The People Wyatt Earp Virgil and Morgan Earp Tombstone established itself as a boomtown after The tragedy that occurred at Tombstone, Arizona involved Wyatt has been most often Virgil and Morgan Earp are the silver was discovered in a local mine in 1877. It quickly characters who were as interesting as the time period. From characterized as a strict, no nonsense brothers of Wyatt. Virgil held various became a prospering community which attracted all lawmen turned silver prospectors, dentists turned gam- person who prefered to settle disputes law enforcement positions throughout walks of life. blers, outlaws and worse, these men all had their stakes in with words rather than confrontation. his life and was appointed as a Deputy the events at Tombstone. Following are short descriptions U.S Marshal before moving to of these men. Wyatt is arguably one of the most Tombstone. Later on, he was The American Old West has captured the minds and inuential individuals in the Old West. appointed as acting marshal for the imaginations of the American people since the West He encoutered some initial hardship in town after the current marshal was became more civilized in the late 1800s to early 1900s. his life when his rst wife died. accidentally slain by one of the Earp In the early 1880s, a specic event occurred that would Eventually, his sutuation improved and antagonists. capture the essence of the old west in one story.
    [Show full text]
  • (NTUA) – Navajo Townsite NPDES Permit No
    December 2011 FACT SHEET Authorization to Discharge under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (NTUA) – Navajo Townsite NPDES Permit No. NN0030335 Applicant address: Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (“NTUA”) P.O. Box 587 Fort Defiance, Arizona 86504 Applicant Contact: Harry L. Begaye, Technical Assistant (928) 729-6208 Facility Address: 0.5 miles west of Navajo Pine High School West of Black Creek Wash in Navajo, NM Facility Contact: Philemon Allison, District Manager (928) 729-6140 I. Summary The NTUA was issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) Permit (No. NN0030335) on December 23, 2006, for its Navajo Townsite wastewater treatment lagoon facility (“WWTF”), pursuant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) regulations set forth in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Part 122.21. The permit was effective December 23, 2006, through midnight, December 22, 2011. NTUA applied to U.S. EPA Region 9 for reissuance on August 16, 2011. This fact sheet is based on information provided by the applicant through its application and discharge data submittal, along with the appropriate laws and regulations. Pursuant to Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the U.S. EPA is proposing issuance of the NPDES permit renewal to NTUA Navajo Townsite (“permittee”) for the discharge of treated domestic wastewater to receiving waters named Black Creek, a tributary to Puerco River, an eventual tributary to the Little Colorado River, a water of the United States. II. Description of Facility The NTUA Navajo Townsite wastewater treatment lagoons are located 0.5 miles west of Navajo Pine High School, west of Black Creek Wash in Navajo New Mexico.
    [Show full text]