DOCSLIB.ORG

The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union 2018 The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union REPORT TO NABU BUNDESVERBAND INGA RACINSKA, SIIM VAHTRUS, SIA “BIOTA” Authors: Inga Racinska, Siim Vahtrus (SIA BIOTA) Editorial oversight: Dr Tilmann Disselhoff Contributions by: Austria – Volker Mauerhofer Belgium (Flanders) – Tom Andries Bulgaria – Stoyan Yotov Croatia – Enes Cerimagic Czech Republic – Vojtech Maca Denmark – Bent Jepsen Estonia – Siim Vahtrus Finland – Sari Sivonen, Ari Neuvonen, Pirkko Posio, Saana-Kaisa Ylitalo and Jouni Rauhala, ELCN France – Maud Latruberce, Julie Babin, Véronique Rioufol Germany – Dr Tilmann Disselhoff, NABU Bundesverband - ELCN Greece – Elias Demian Hungary – Csaba Kiss Ireland – Jonathan Moore Italy – Iva Rossi Latvia – Inga Racinska and Girts Baranovskis Lithuania – Gintaras Riauba and Zymantas Morkvenas Netherlands – Patrick Nuvelstijn Poland – Marta Kaczynska Portugal – Ana Marta Paz Romania – Catalina Radulescu Slovakia – Ivana Figuli Slovenia – Damijan Denac and Tomaz Petrovic Spain – Ana Barreira, Hernan Collado Urieta, Jofre Rodrigo and Miquel Rafa Fornieles Sweden – Johanna Ehlin and Helena Ringblom, ELCN United Kingdom – John Houston Thanks to the ELCN project team for translating the English summary. Citation recommended: Račinska, I., Vahtrus, S. (2018). The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union. Report to NABU Bundesverband. This report is an initiative of the European Private Land Conservation Network (ELCN). 1 The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union Table of Contents English summary ................................................................................................................................ 5 Catalan summary – Resum ................................................................................................................. 6 Croatian summary – Sažetak .............................................................................................................. 8 Dutch summary – Samenvatting ........................................................................................................ 9 Estonian summary – Kokkuvõtte ...................................................................................................... 11 French summary – Résumé .............................................................................................................. 12 German summary – Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................... 14 Latvian summary – Kopsavilkums .................................................................................................... 16 Italian summary – Sommario ........................................................................................................... 18 Portuguese summary – Resumo ....................................................................................................... 20 Spanish summary – Resumen ........................................................................................................... 22 Swedish summary – Sammanfattning .............................................................................................. 24 Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 25 Conservation easements ............................................................................................................... 25 Background ................................................................................................................................... 25 Legal basis for conservation easements......................................................................................... 27 Chapter 2. The scope and methodology of the study ....................................................................... 28 2.1. The scope of the study ........................................................................................................... 28 Thematic scope ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Geographic scope ................................................................................................................................... 28 2.2. Methodology.......................................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 3. Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.1. Can easements be used to dedicate property or part of it to the nature conservation purposes, in principle? .................................................................................................................................. 30 Servitudes .............................................................................................................................................. 30 Other contractual agreements ................................................................................................................ 31 France, real environmental obligations ................................................................................................... 32 Belgium (Flanders), implementation of the management plan ................................................................ 32 Ireland, Section 18 agreements............................................................................................................... 32 Netherlands, the qualitative obligation ................................................................................................... 33 3.2. In which form may the easement be described in the title? .................................................... 33 3.3. If conservation easements may be entered in the land title, can they can be entered on the basis of a voluntary agreement, and between the land owner and a third party “in gross”? .......... 33 Table 1. Overview of the national responses ................................................................................. 34 Chapter 4. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 35 2 The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union Chapter 5. Case Studies .................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 5.1. Case study: Austria ............................................................................................................. 38 Chapter 5.2. Case study: Belgium (Flanders)............................................................................................ 41 Chapter 5.3. Case study: Bulgaria ............................................................................................................ 44 Chapter 5.4. Case study: Croatia ............................................................................................................. 46 Chapter 5.5. Case study: Czech Republic ................................................................................................. 49 Chapter 5.6. Case study: Denmark .......................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 5.7. Case study: Estonia ............................................................................................................. 53 Chapter 5.8. Case study: Finland ............................................................................................................. 55 Chapter 5.9. Case study: France .............................................................................................................. 58 Chapter 5.10. Case study: Germany ........................................................................................................ 60 Chapter 5.11. Case study: Greece ........................................................................................................... 62 Chapter 5.12. Case study: Hungary ......................................................................................................... 64 Chapter 5.13. Case study: Ireland............................................................................................................ 67 Chapter 5.14. Case study: Italy ................................................................................................................ 73 Chapter 5.15. Case study: Latvia ............................................................................................................. 75 Chapter 5.16. Case study: Lithuania ........................................................................................................ 77 Chapter 5.17. Case study: the Netherlands ............................................................................................. 79 Chapter 5.18. Case study: Poland ............................................................................................................ 82 Chapter 5.19. Case study: Portugal ......................................................................................................... 85 Chapter 5.20. Case study: Romania ......................................................................................................... 87 Chapter 5.21. Case study: Slovakia .......................................................................................................... 89 Chapter 5.22. Case study: Slovenia ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Real Estate Law Review Real Estate Law Review
    the Real Estate Law Review Law Real Estate Real Estate Law Review Seventh Edition Editor John Nevin Seventh Edition lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd Real Estate Law Review Seventh Edition Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd ThisTh article was first published in March 2018 For further information please contact [email protected] Editor John Nevin lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Tom Barnes SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Thomas Lee, Joel Woods ACCOUNT MANAGERS Pere Aspinall, Sophie Emberson, Laura Lynas, Jack Bagnall PRODUCT MARKETING EXECUTIVE Rebecca Mogridge RESEARCHER Arthur Hunter EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Gavin Jordan HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Claire Ancell SUBEDITOR Gina Mete CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of February 2018, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries
    [Show full text]
  • Law 10/2008, of 10 July, of the Fourth Book of the Civil Code of Catalonia, Regarding Successions Section 200-00017/08
    Law 10/2008, of 10 July, of the fourth book of the Civil Code of Catalonia, regarding successions Section 200-00017/08 PREAMBLE I. PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURE In line with the Catalan civil law coding scheme as set out by Law 29/2002, of 30 December, the first law of the Civil Code of Catalonia, this law gives approval to the fourth book of the Civil Code relating to inheritances. Notwithstanding the provisions of article 6 of the aforementioned law, it does not do so by introducing amendments that add to, remove or newly draft current regulations; rather, it entails a complete alternative text, thereby avoiding the difficulties brought about by subsequent consolidation. It is known that Catalan law had already set out provisions in this sphere with a calling to achieve completeness by means of Law 40/1991, of 30 December, on the Code of Succession mortis causa in civil law in Catalonia. The law that is currently being passed follows in the footsteps of its predecessor and preserves its foundations, its basic institutional structure and even the drafting in the case of many articles. Nonetheless, the opportunity afforded by the incorporation of its content into the fourth book of the Civil Code has been taken in order to update a large number of its institutions and rules and, in certain areas, to conduct major reforms. In this regard, it is important to not overlook the fact that, although the Code of Succession was a somewhat recent text that had been in force for sixteen years, a major proportion of its articles stemmed from the 1960 Compilation or the 1955 Draft Compilation, legal bodies that have become rusty on account of the historical circumstances in which they were drafted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law Larissa Katz
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 12:15 p.m. McGill Law Journal Revue de droit de McGill The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law Larissa Katz Volume 55, Number 1, March 2010 Article abstract On what grounds can we justify the transformation of squatters into owners? URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/039836ar To understand the moral significance of adverse possession, the author DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/039836ar proposes an analogy. Much of the moral analysis of adverse possession has proceeded on the basis that adverse possessors are land thieves. The author See table of contents first explains why the analogy of adverse possessor to land thief is misleading. Then, she argues that there is a much closer analogy between adverse possession and revolution or, more precisely, a bloodless coup d’état. The Publisher(s) recognition of the adverse possessor’s (private) authority solves the moral problem created by an agendaless object just as the recognition of the existing McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill government’s (public) authority, whatever its origin, solves the moral problem of a stateless people. The morality of adverse possession, seen this way, does ISSN not turn on any particularized evaluation of the squatter’s deserts or her uses of the land. The author thus does not propose that adverse possession is 0024-9041 (print) justified in the same way that some argue a conscientious revolutionary is 1920-6356 (digital) justified in resisting an oppressive or otherwise unjust sovereign. Rather, the morality of adverse possession is found where we might least expect it: in its Explore this journal positivist strategy of ratifying the claims to authority of a squatter without regard to the substantive merits of her agenda or her personal virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Animal & Natural Resource
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL & NATURAL RESOURCE LAW Michigan State University College of Law MAY 2019 VOLUME XV The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law is published annually by law students at Michigan State University College of Law. The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law received generous support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law. Without their generous support, the Journal would not have been able to publish and host its annual symposium. The Journal also is funded by subscription revenues. Subscription requests and article submissions may be sent to: Professor David Favre, Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, Michigan State University College of Law, 368 Law College Building, East Lansing MI 48824, or by email to msujanrl@ gmail.com. Current yearly subscription rates are $27.00 in the U.S. and current yearly Internet subscription rates are $27.00. Subscriptions are renewed automatically unless a request for discontinuance is received. Back issues may be obtained from: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14209. The Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law welcomes the submission of articles, book reviews, and notes & comments. Each manuscript must be double spaced, in 12 point, Times New Roman; footnotes must be single spaced, 10 point, Times New Roman. Submissions should be sent to [email protected] using Microsoft Word or PDF format. Submissions should conform closely to the 19th edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. All articles contain a 2019 author copyright unless otherwise noted at beginning of article. Copyright © 2019 by the Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, Michigan State University College of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous and Apparent Easement
    Continuous And Apparent Easement tristichicSickening Westleigh Spencer smilingsolaces, some his sleeving tracing soled removably! ballyrag uphill. Levon grangerizing imaginably. Imputable and He and continuous, our service provides information in various types of dismemberments of setbacks and her. Article 615 Easements may be continuous or discontinuous apparent or nonapparent Continuous easements are deficient the order of which discourage or. Any pet who is not wish to contribute may exempt loan by renouncing the easement for the below of the others. Easements Neighborhood and daily of way Notaries of France. An apparent by continuing to establish in no feasible method of lands are there was retained an office or impliedly granted for instance, listing all three descriptions referred to. Fourthly, maintain, represent the petitioner to inquire is the relatives of Maria Florentino as evidence when she died. Can he was held to meet this type is apparent sign, whose use may be found on private use made apparent easement? Purchasers of severance; minority require help they benefit of dominant tenement from being interests in determining implication, if your profile web property interest in efficiently handling varied. British Columbia, which service became really true easement upon which death. 192 the court observed that An easement is harsh if its existence is indicated by signs which might be seen him known right a careful inspection by an person ordinarily conversant with human subject The award further observed that A continuous or apparent easement is either a curtain or enjoyed by means declare a fixture. When necessity are necessary to determine whether a declaratory judgment, or necessary for excessive use requirements of aqueduct for.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Civil Law Studies
    Journal of Civil Law Studies Volume 7 | Number 1 Article 11 10-29-2014 Complete V.7 No.1 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls Part of the Civil Law Commons Repository Citation Complete V.7 No.1, 7 J. Civ. L. Stud. (2014) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls/vol7/iss1/11 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Law Studies by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume 7 Number 1 2014 ___________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLES . Law and the Lodestar: Tunisian Civil Law and the Task of Ordering Plurality in the Aftermath of the Jasmine Revolution .................................................. Dan E. Stigall . Mixed Jurisdiction and the Scottish Legal Tradition: Reconsidering the Concept of Mixture ................................................................. Stephen Thomson . Civil Status and Civil Registry: Current Trends in Spanish Law ...................Sofía de Salas Murillo . Enlarged State Power to Declare Nullity: The Hidden State Interest in the Chinese Contract Law .................................................... Hao Jiang CIVIL LAW TRANSLATIONS . Louisiana Civil Code - Code civil de Louisiane Book III, Titles 7 and 8 ..........................................................................Center of Civil Law Studies CIVIL
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Estate Law Review
    [ Exclusively for: Eddy Leks | 04-Apr-14, 08:41 AM ] ©The Law Reviews The Real Estate Law Review Third Edition Editor David Waterfield Law Business Research The Real Estate Law Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in The Real Estate Law Review, 3rd edition (published in March 2014 – editor David Waterfield). For further information please email [email protected] The Real Estate Law Review Third Edition Editor David Waterfield Law Business Research Ltd THE LAW REVIEWS THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS REVIEW THE RESTRUCTURING REVIEW THE PRIVATE COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION REVIEW THE EMPLOYMENT LAW REVIEW THE PUBLIC COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT REVIEW THE BANKING REGULATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REVIEW THE MERGER CONTROL REVIEW THE TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVIEW THE INWARD INVESTMENT AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION REVIEW THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REVIEW THE CORPORATE IMMIGRATION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW THE PROJECTS AND CONSTRUCTION REVIEW THE INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS REVIEW THE REAL ESTATE LAW REVIEW THE PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW THE ENERGY REGULATION AND MARKETS REVIEW THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW THE ASSET MANAGEMENT REVIEW THE PRIVATE WEALTH AND PRIVATE CLIENT REVIEW THE MINING LAW REVIEW THE EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION REVIEW THE ANTI-BRIBERY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION REVIEW THE CARTELS AND LENIENCY REVIEW THE TAX DISPUTES AND LITIGATION REVIEW THE LIFE SCIENCES LAW REVIEW THE INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE LAW
    [Show full text]
  • Ownership – Acquisition, Proof and Extinction
    Ownership Acquisition of ownership Modalities of Acquisition of Individual Ownership . Generally, the law recognizes two types/class of acquiring ownership: Original acquisition, and Derivative acquisition . Ownership is said to be acquired through original acquisition when an individual acquires ownership over a given thing by his own, without depending on anyone's title/ownership. Ownership may be acquires in this manner over a thing which: - has never been owned, res nullius - has had owner but abandoned, res derelictae - has owner, but the new owner doesn’t depend on the pre-existing OP as a source . Derivative acquisition refers to the acquisition of ownership through transfer of ownership. This is a case of buying/taking the right rather than establishing original ownership. It is a derivative mechanism of acquiring ownership. It requires juridical acts and is dependent on the quality of ownership of the original acquirer. Original Acquisition of Ownership . The CC recognizes 4 modes of original acquisition of OP: - Occupation - Possession in good faith - Usucaption - Accession . Some apply to acquisition of OP only on corporeal movables, others to immovable only & some for both. Acquisition of OP by Occupation . No clear definition of the term in the CC . From a systematic reading of Art 1151 we can describe Occupation as: a mode of acquiring OP whereby a person becomes an owner of a masterless corporeal chattel by taking possession of the thing with the intention of becoming owner. Thus, in order to become owner by occupation, the following elements must be fulfilled cumulatively: - The thing must be a corporeal movable - The thing must be susceptible of private appropriation - The thing must be masterless - The person must have taken possession of the thing - The possession must be with intention of becoming owner of the thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Exhaustion Connects Common Law to Equity: Impression Products, Inc
    Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Volume 17 Issue 1 Article 4 1-18-2018 Patent Exhaustion Connects Common Law to Equity: Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. Kumiko Kitaoka Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjip Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Kumiko Kitaoka, Patent Exhaustion Connects Common Law to Equity: Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., 17 Chi. -Kent J. Intell. Prop. 96 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjip/vol17/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. PATENT EXHAUSTION CONNECTS COMMON LAW TO EQUITY: IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC. V. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. KUMIKO KITAOKA I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 97 II. BACKGROUND .............................................................................. 101 A. Brief Summary of Impression Products ............................ 101 1. Facts and Procedural Highlights: Imported Modified Single-Use Printer Cartridges ................................... 101 2. The Federal Circuit: Territoriality and Patentees’ Freedom to Contract ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulation of Private Conservation Legal Tools in Catalonia: an Inspiring Precedent for the Roman Law Jurisdictions
    REVISTA CATALANA DE DRET AMBIENTAL Vol. X Núm. 1 (2019): 1 – 29 -Estudio- THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE CONSERVATION LEGAL TOOLS IN CATALONIA: AN INSPIRING PRECEDENT FOR THE ROMAN LAW JURISDICTIONS HERNAN COLLADO URIETA Advocat Recibido: 12 de septiembre de 2018 / Aceptado: 24 de enero de 2019 ABSTRACT: During the first decades of the 21st century, Catalonia has successfully received Land Stewardship as a strategy for the conservation of nature. During this period, given the great opportunity that has been the parallel process of coding Catalan Civil Law, many efforts have been made to regulate Land Stewardship Agreements to the point of getting specific provisions in the Civil Code of Catalonia. In this article, I analyse the current civil regulation of the Land Stewardship Agreements in the Civil Code of Catalonia based on their essential elements and providing a critical view of the resulting legal framework. The objective is to disseminate the key learning and suggestions of the Catalan case for the professionals of the Land Stewardship around the world. RESUM: Durant les primeres dècades del segle XXI, Catalunya ha acollit amb èxit la custòdia del territori com a estratègia per a la conservació de la natura. En aquest període, atesa la gran oportunitat que ha suposat el procés paral·lel de codificació del dret civil Català, s'han fet molts esforços per tal de regular els acords de custòdia fins al punt d’aconseguir introduir disposicions específiques en el Codi civil de Catalunya. En aquest article, analitzo la regulació civil actual dels acords de custòdia del territori al Codi civil de Catalunya partint dels seus elements essencials i aportant una visió crítica del marc jurídic resultant.
    [Show full text]
  • From Nuisance to Environmental Protection in Continental Europe
    FROM NUISANCE TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN CONTINENTAL EUROPE VANESSA CASADO PEREZ* & CARLOS GOMEZ LIGUERRE† INTRODUCTION Neighboring relationships are prone to conflict. The use of an estate has effects on the one next to it. A doctor may be bothered by the noise coming from a confectioner’s business.1 The more heterogeneous the uses of the pieces of property are, the more likely conflicts are to arise. While individuals have always had the capacity to affect the enjoyment of their neighbors, the situations became more complex with the advent of industrialization, which put residential and industrial users in close proximity. Historically, the law of nuisance has been used to solve these conflicts. Nuisance law combines property and liability rules leading to injunction and damage remedies.2 Today, regulation has been added to the mix of solutions *. Associate Professor, Texas A&M School of Law. Research Associate Professor, Texas A&M Department of Agricultural Economics. Affiliated Researcher, The Bill Lane Center for the American West, Stanford University. E-mail: [email protected]. †. Profesor Titular, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona. Humboldt Research Scholarship for Experienced Researchers – Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung. E-mail: [email protected]. The authors want to thank the organizers of and participants in the Convergence and Divergence in Private Law conference held at the New York University School of Law on November 1−3, 2018. The authors thank Joseph Rebagliati and Steffani Fausone for their excellent research assistance. 1. R.H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & ECON. 1, 2 (1960). 2. This mix of remedies makes the analysis of this legal institution complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Degli Studi Di Camerino
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CAMERINO SCUOLA DI GIURISPRUDENZA CASE STUDIES AND BEST PRACTICES ANALYSIS TO ENHANCE EU FAMILY AND SUCCESSION LAW. WORKING PAPER a cura di Jerca Kramberger Škerl, Lucia Ruggeri, Francesco Giacomo Viterbo CAMERINO 2019 UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CAMERINO SCUOLA DI GIURISPRUDENZA CASE STUDIES AND BEST PRACTICES ANALYSIS TO ENHANCE EU FAMILY AND SUCCESSION LAW. WORKING PAPER a cura di Jerca Kramberger Škerl, Lucia Ruggeri, Francesco Giacomo Viterbo CAMERINO 2019 COMITATO SCIENTIFICO INTERNAZIONALE Prof. Ignacio De Cuevillas Matozzi, Prof. Manuel Ignacio Feliu Rey, Prof. Luigi Ferrajoli, Prof. Giulio Illuminati, Prof. Fabian Klinck, Prof. Rolf Knütel, Prof. Luigi Labruna, Prof. Franco Modugno, Prof. Pietro Perlingieri, Prof. Ingo Reichard DIRETTORE SCIENTIFICO Prof. Rocco Favale COMITATO DI REDAZIONE Marta Cerioni, Danila Di Benedetto, Giovanna Di Benedetto, Roberto Garetto, Manuela Giobbi, Federico Pascucci, Giovanni Russo, Karina Zabrodina ISBN: 978-886768-042-9 Copyright: Facoltà di Giurisprudenza. Università di Camerino, 7 Dicembre 2019 Indirizzo di contatto: [email protected] This book collects the Case studies and best practices analysis to enhance EU Family and Succession Law. Working Paper which is a deliverable of the project number n. 800821-JUST-AG- 2017/JUST-JCOO- AG-2017 The content of this book represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. Working Paper INDICE María Belén Barrios Garrido-Lestache Public notary - Barco de Ávila Transborder successions including unliquidated matrimonial property regime of a dissolved marriage ............ pag. 7 Vincenzo Bonanno Student at the Specialization School in Civil Law - University of Camerino Patrimonial regimes and de facto cohabitation in European and Italian law ...........................................
    [Show full text]