DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for the Charadriiformes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for the Charadriiformes College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU Biology Faculty Publications Biology 2-1995 Phylogenetic reanalysis of Strauch's osteological data set for the Charadriiformes Philip C. Chu College of Saint Benedict/Saint John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/biology_pubs Part of the Biology Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Chu, PC. 1995. Phylogenetic reanalysis of Strauch's osteological data set for the Charadriiformes. The Condor 97(1): 174-196. Published as Phylogenetic reanalysis of Strauch's osteological data set for the Charadriiformes. The Condor 97(1): 174-196. ©1995 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. Copying and permissions notice: Authorization to copy this content beyond fair use (as specified in Sections 107 and 108 of the U. S. Copyright Law) for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted on behalf of The Cooper Ornithological Society for libraries and other users, provided that they are registered with and pay the specified eef via Rightslink® on JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/r/ucal) or directly with the Copyright Clearance Center, http://www.copyright.com. TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962). ences were made using an intuitive method. These data were analyzed using the method of character compatibility (Estabrook 1972; Esta- Much of the literature of systematicsdeals with the brooket al. 1975,1976a, 1976b; McMorris 1975; identification of characterswhich are good estimators Es&brook et al. 1977). of phylogenetic history. Early systematistshad little In compatibility analysis, characters are treat- more than their own insights to help them choosethe characterswhich best indicate relationships. The sta- ed as partially-ordered sets; that is, each char- bility of much of zoological classificationis testimony acter is viewed as a set of states, with the states to their goodjudgment in their choices.Their methods, being ordered by some hypothesis of character however, have made it difficult or impossiblefor others evolution (Fig. 2). Strauch generated hypotheses to follow or repeat the stepsfrom observationsof spec- of character evolution using a common = prim- imens to the statements of relationship among taxa itive criterion. The most common state was de- (Strauch 1978:269). termined with reference to the Charadriiformes Appropriately, Strauch’s own (1978; Fig. 1) in- alone. For many characters, the most common vestigation of charadriiform relationships was state in two outgroups- the cranes and their rel- explicit in both its assumptions and method of atives (Gruiformes) and the pigeons (Columbi- clustering taxa, and is therefore repeatable. In- formes)-was identified as well, but if the most deed, among morphological studies examining common outgroup state differed from the most the full range of charadriiform taxa, only that of common charadriiform state, then the latter was Strauch meets the criterion of repeatability; a coded as primitive (e.g., characters 38, 45, and second such study is currently under way 56). (McKitrick, unpubl. manuscript). Many of Strauch’s characters had more than two states. For each of these an ordered trans- formation series was constructed, though Strauch said (1978: 277) that his hypotheses oforder were ’ ’ Received 4 April 1994. Accepted 14 October 1994. sometimes only a guess. 11741 REANALYSIS OF CHARADRIIFORM PHYLOGENY 175 Cladorhynchus leucocephalus, Recurvirostra Himan topus lbidorhyncha struthersii Haematopus lapwings (Vanellinae ) true plovers (Charadriinae), feltohyas australis thick-knees (Burhinidae) Pluvianus aegyptius Dromas ardeola Pluvianellus socialis Chionis alba coursers (Cursoriinae) pratincoles (Glareolinae) 1 ’ - Rynchops I I terns (Sterninae) gulls (Larinae) skuas (Stercorariinae) Hydrophasianus chirurgus, Jacana Metopidius indicus, Actophilomis, lrediparra gallinacea, Microparra capensis seedsnipe (Thinocoridae) painted snipe (Rostratulidae) phalaropes (Phalaropodinae) Tringa, Heteroscelus, Catoptrophorus semipalmatus Numenius, Bartramia longicauda Prosobonia cancellata Arenaria Actitis, Aphriza virgata, Calidris, Eurynorhynchus pygmaeus, Micropalama himantopus, Tryngites subruficollis, Philomachus pugnax, Limicola falck7ellus Limnodromus Xenus cinereus Limosa Coenocorypha aucklandica Lymnocryptes minimus Philohela minor, Scolopax Gallinago auks (Alcidae) FIGURE 1. Strauch’s hypothesisof shorebird relationships. The tree is modified from his (1978) fig. 36; modificationswere made as specifiedin his fig. 2. As its name suggests,the character-compati- senting character-statecombinations not in the bility method requires that the compatibility of study collection are discarded and the result is a charactersbe assessed.To determine whether or non-reticulate tree-any non-reticulate tree- not two charactersare compatible, their cartesian then the characters are compatible. Character product is calculated. The result is a new set that compatibility thus refersto the conditionin which can be visualized as a lattice; the lattice has a the sequenceof character-statetransformations vertex for every possible combination of states hypothesizedfor two or more characterscan be from both characters (Fig. 3). If vertices repre- accommodated by a single phylogenetictree. 176 PHILIP C. CHU a a FIGURE 2. Charactersas partially ordered sets. In the ball-and-stick diagrams shown here, each ball is a characterstate; the balls are connectedso as to depict hypothesesof character-statepolarity and order. In diagram A, state a is primitive and state b is derived. In diagram B, a is primitive; b is derived from a; and both c and d are derived independentlyfrom b. The likelihood of finding a large set of mutually be determined, there is no underlying biological compatible charactersis taken to be small unless validity” (1980: 109). A secondcharge addressed compatibility results from shared evolutionary the particulars of Strauch’s character-state cod- history. Thus, large setsof compatible characters ing, ordering, and polarization; a third addressed provide better evidence of shared history than Strauch’s results,which were claimed to be “rad- do small sets,and permit greater confidence that ically different from all previous published hy- the tree capable of accommodating their respec- potheses” (1980: 109). tive transformation series is the true genealogy. Mickevich and Parenti, disagreeingwith some Initially, the largestset of mutually compatible of Strauch’s coding procedures,rejected 35 of his characters is determined. This initial analysis 70 characters, then analyzed the remaining 35 typically resolvesthe deepestpart of the tree, but using the computer program WAGNER 78 (Far- fails to resolve relationships at less general hi- ris 1978). Two shortest Wagner networks were erarchical levels. found; thesewere rooted with a hypothetical an- Within each group identified by the initial cestor constructed from characters for which analysis, the resolution of relationships is accom- Strauch described an outgroup state (Lundberg plished by determining which charactersvary in 1972). The consensustree calculated from these that group and then identifying from those vari- two shortest networks is shown in Figure 4. able charactersa largest clique. The processmay Unfortunately, the Mickevich and Parenti be repeated in smaller and smaller groups until reanalysis is itself not entirely satisfactory. As the tree is suitably resolved. indicated by the character descriptions below, Mickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Meinmahla Kyun Wildlife Sanctuary Myanmar
    Meinmahla Kyun Wildlife Sanctuary Myanmar EAAF NETWORK SITE CODE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: E A A F 1 4 0 Site Information Sheet on East Asian-Australasian Flyway Network Sites (SIS) – 2017 version Available for download from http://www.eaaflyway.net/about/the-flyway/flyway-site-network/ 1 of 22 Information Sheet on EAA Flyway Network Sites | Meinmahla Kyun Wildlife Sanctuary [EAAF140] Categories approved by Second Meeting of the Partners of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership in Beijing, China 13-14 November 2007 - Report (Minutes) Agenda Item 3.13 Notes for compilers: 1. The management body intending to nominate a site for inclusion in the East Asian - Australasian Flyway Site Network is requested to complete a Site Information Sheet. The Site Information Sheet will provide the basic information of the site and detail how the site meets the criteria for inclusion in the Flyway Site Network. When there is a new nomination or an SIS update, the following sections with an asterisk (*), from Questions 1-14 and Question 30, must be filled or updated at least so that it can justify the international importance of the habitat for migratory waterbirds. 2. The Site Information Sheet is based on the Ramsar Information Sheet. If the site proposed for the Flyway Site Network is an existing Ramsar site then the documentation process can be simplified. 3. Once completed, the Site Information Sheet (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the Information Sheet and, where possible, digital versions (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns Suborder LARI
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 191, 223 & 227-228. Order CHARADRIIFORMES: Waders, Gulls and Terns The family sequence of Christidis & Boles (1994), who adopted that of Sibley et al. (1988) and Sibley & Monroe (1990), is followed here. Suborder LARI: Skuas, Gulls, Terns and Skimmers Condon (1975) and Checklist Committee (1990) recognised three subfamilies within the Laridae (Larinae, Sterninae and Megalopterinae) but this division has not been widely adopted. We follow Gochfeld & Burger (1996) in recognising gulls in one family (Laridae) and terns and noddies in another (Sternidae). The sequence of species for Stercorariidae and Laridae follows Peters (1934) and for Sternidae follows Bridge et al. (2005). Family LARIDAE Rafinesque: Gulls Laridia Rafinesque, 1815: Analyse de la Nature: 72 – Type genus Larus Linnaeus, 1758. Genus Larus Linnaeus Larus Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 136 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Larus marinus Linnaeus. Gavia Boie, 1822: Isis von Oken, Heft 10: col. 563 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Larus ridibundus Linnaeus. Junior homonym of Gavia Moehring, 1758. Hydrocoleus Kaup, 1829: Skizz. Entw.-Gesch. Eur. Thierw.: 113 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Larus minutus Linnaeus. Chroicocephalus Eyton, 1836: Cat. Brit. Birds: 53 – Type species (by monotypy) Larus cucullatus Reichenbach = Larus pipixcan Wagler. Gelastes Bonaparte, 1853: Journ. für Ornith.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    i procp:edings of uxited states national :\[uset7m. 359 23498 g. D. 13 5 A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; 0. 31 ; B. S. Leiigtli ICT millime- ters. GGGl. 17 specimeus. St. Michaels, Alaslai. II. M. Bannister. a. Length 210 millimeters. D. 13; A. 14; V. 3; P. 33; C— ; B. 8. h. Length 200 millimeters. D. 14: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C— ; B. 8. e. Length 135 millimeters. D. 12: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C. 30; B. 8. The remaining fourteen specimens vary in length from 110 to 180 mil- limeters. United States National Museum, WasJiingtoiij January 5, 1880. FOURTBI III\.STAI.:HEIVT OF ©R!VBTBIOI.O«ICAI. BIBI.IOCiRAPHV r BE:INC} a Jf.ffJ^T ©F FAUIVA!. I»l.TjBf.S«'ATI©.\S REff,ATIIV« T© BRIT- I!§H RIRD!^. My BR. ELS^IOTT COUES, U. S. A. The zlppendix to the "Birds of the Colorado Yalley- (pp. 507 [lJ-784 [218]), which gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to North American Birds, is to be considered as the first instalment of a "Uni- versal Bibliography of Ornithology''. The second instalment occupies pp. 230-330 of the " Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 'V Yol. Y, No. 2, Sept. G, 1879, and similarly gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to the Birds of the rest of America.. The.third instalment, which occnpies the same "Bulletin", same Yol.,, No. 4 (in press), consists of an entirely different set of titles, being those belonging to the "systematic" department of the whole Bibliography^ in so far as America is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Patagonia & Central Chile
    WILD PATAGONIA & CENTRAL CHILE: PUMAS, PENGUINS, CONDORS & MORE! NOVEMBER 1–18, 2019 Pumas simply rock! This year we enjoyed 9 different cats! Observing the antics of lovely Amber here and her impressive family of four cubs was certainly the highlight in Torres del Paine National Park — Photo: Andrew Whittaker LEADERS: ANDREW WHITTAKER & FERNANDO DIAZ LIST COMPILED BY: ANDREW WHITTAKER VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM Sensational, phenomenal, outstanding Chile—no superlatives can ever adequately describe the amazing wildlife spectacles we enjoyed on this year’s tour to this breathtaking and friendly country! Stupendous world-class scenery abounded with a non-stop array of exciting and easy birding, fantastic endemics, and super mega Patagonian specialties. Also, as I promised from day one, everyone fell in love with Chile’s incredible array of large and colorful tapaculos; we enjoyed stellar views of all of the country’s 8 known species. Always enigmatic and confiding, the cute Chucao Tapaculo is in the Top 5 — Photo: Andrew Whittaker However, the icing on the cake of our tour was not birds but our simply amazing Puma encounters. Yet again we had another series of truly fabulous moments, even beating our previous record of 8 Pumas on the last day when I encountered a further 2 young Pumas on our way out of the park, making it an incredible 9 different Pumas! Our Puma sightings take some beating, as they have stood for the last three years at 6, 7, and 8. For sure none of us will ever forget the magical 45 minutes spent observing Amber meeting up with her four 1- year-old cubs as they joyfully greeted her return.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property
    Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 185 Map 2: Andean-North Patagonian Biosphere Reserve: Context for the Nominated Proprty. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 186 Map 3: Vegetation of the Valdivian Ecoregion 187 Map 4: Vegetation Communities in Los Alerces National Park 188 Map 5: Strict Nature and Wildlife Reserve 189 Map 6: Usage Zoning, Los Alerces National Park 190 Map 7: Human Settlements and Infrastructure 191 Appendix 2: Species Lists Ap9n192 Appendix 2.1 List of Plant Species Recorded at PNLA 193 Appendix 2.2: List of Animal Species: Mammals 212 Appendix 2.3: List of Animal Species: Birds 214 Appendix 2.4: List of Animal Species: Reptiles 219 Appendix 2.5: List of Animal Species: Amphibians 220 Appendix 2.6: List of Animal Species: Fish 221 Appendix 2.7: List of Animal Species and Threat Status 222 Appendix 3: Law No. 19,292 Append228 Appendix 4: PNLA Management Plan Approval and Contents Appendi242 Appendix 5: Participative Process for Writing the Nomination Form Appendi252 Synthesis 252 Management Plan UpdateWorkshop 253 Annex A: Interview Guide 256 Annex B: Meetings and Interviews Held 257 Annex C: Self-Administered Survey 261 Annex D: ExternalWorkshop Participants 262 Annex E: Promotional Leaflet 264 Annex F: Interview Results Summary 267 Annex G: Survey Results Summary 272 Annex H: Esquel Declaration of Interest 274 Annex I: Trevelin Declaration of Interest 276 Annex J: Chubut Tourism Secretariat Declaration of Interest 278
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Chile a Photo Guide
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be 88 distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical 89 means without prior written permission of the publisher. WALKING WATERBIRDS unmistakable, elegant wader; no similar species in Chile SHOREBIRDS For ID purposes there are 3 basic types of shorebirds: 6 ‘unmistakable’ species (avocet, stilt, oystercatchers, sheathbill; pp. 89–91); 13 plovers (mainly visual feeders with stop- start feeding actions; pp. 92–98); and 22 sandpipers (mainly tactile feeders, probing and pick- ing as they walk along; pp. 99–109). Most favor open habitats, typically near water. Different species readily associate together, which can help with ID—compare size, shape, and behavior of an unfamiliar species with other species you know (see below); voice can also be useful. 2 1 5 3 3 3 4 4 7 6 6 Andean Avocet Recurvirostra andina 45–48cm N Andes. Fairly common s. to Atacama (3700–4600m); rarely wanders to coast. Shallow saline lakes, At first glance, these shorebirds might seem impossible to ID, but it helps when different species as- adjacent bogs. Feeds by wading, sweeping its bill side to side in shallow water. Calls: ringing, slightly sociate together. The unmistakable White-backed Stilt left of center (1) is one reference point, and nasal wiek wiek…, and wehk. Ages/sexes similar, but female bill more strongly recurved. the large brown sandpiper with a decurved bill at far left is a Hudsonian Whimbrel (2), another reference for size. Thus, the 4 stocky, short-billed, standing shorebirds = Black-bellied Plovers (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Dentist Bird: How Plover Bird Came to Clean Crocodile's Teeth Teacher's
    Teacher’s Guide Dentist Bird: How Plover Bird Came to Clean Crocodile’s Teeth Background INT RODUCING T HE APP Dentist Bird is ● Read an interactive picture book with embedded mini-games. based on How ● Play the game Dentist Bird’s Mission of Mercy. Take flight and Plover Bird overcome obstacles to deliver medicine to Crocodile! Came to Clean ● Learn by engaging in geography and science ativities after Crocodile’s reading the book. Teeth, a folktale from Map Credit: Nations Online Project Map Credit: Liberia. Liberia is a country in West Africa. This folktale is about a sick STANDARDS Grade 3: Common Core State Standards Alignment Common Core State StandardGrade 2: Common CoreRead State Activity: Standards Reproducible: Alignment Reproducible: Learn Learn Module: Reproducible: Reproducible: Play Module : Module Comprehension Parts of a Make a Story Module: Where in The Problem Plover Bird Dentist Bird’s crocodile who asks for help from Check Story Map Sounds of the the World is Hut Jobs Chart Mission of Rainforest Liberia? Mercy Common Core State StandardGrade 1: Common ReadCore StateActivity: StandardsReproducible: Alignment Reproducible: Learn Learn Module: Reproducible: Reproducible: Play Module : Module Comprehension Parts of a Make a StoryReproducible: Module: Reproducible:Where in The Problem Plover Bird Reproducible:Dentist Bird’s Check Story Map AnimalSounds Cards of the Continents,the World is Hut Jobs Chart PloverMission Bird of in Rainforest Africa,Liberia? and MotionMercy Common Core State StandardKindergarten: CommonRead
    [Show full text]
  • Attagis Gayi Geoffroy Saint Hilaire Y Lesson, 1831
    FICHA DE ANTECEDENTES DE ESPECIE Id especie: NOMBRE CIENTÍFICO: Attagis gayi Geoffroy Saint Hilaire y Lesson, 1831 NOMBRE COMÚN: Perdicita cordillerana, tortolón, agachona grande, Rufous-bellied Seedsnipe Fotografía de Attagis gayi (AUTOR, Roberto Villablanca) Reino: Animalia Orden: Charadriiformes Phyllum/División: Chordata Familia: Thinocoridae Clase: Aves Género: Attagis Sinonimia: Nota Taxonómica: Se reconocen tres subespecies (Fjeldsa 1996): • Attagis gayi latreillii , Lesson 1831. Habita el norte de Ecuador • Attagis gayi simonsi , Chubb 1918, centro de Perú, hasta el norte de Chile, oeste de Bolivia y noroeste de Argentina. • Attagis gayi gayi , Geoffroy Saint Hilaire y Lesson 1831, Andes de Chile y Argentina, desde Antofagasta y Salta hasta Tierra del Fuego. ANTECEDENTES GENERALES Aspectos Morfológicos Longitud 27 a 31 cm, es la más grande de los representantes de la familia, no presenta dimorfismo sexual y tiene un cuerpo grande, con cabeza pequeña y piernas cortas, Su plumaje es muy críptico, con una coloración general parda, con ocre y rojizo en el abdomen (Martínez & González 2004). Color general por encima de un gris ceniza con rayitas o flechas concéntricas de un negro oscuro. Cubiertas alares más rufas y también moteadas de flechas negras. Primarias pardo oscuro, negruzcas en su barba externa. Supracaudales y rectrices rufo pálido con vermiculaciones negras. Garganta color isabelino, lados de ésta, cuello y parte superior del pecho de fondo rufo pálido con vermiculaciones negras concéntricas. Toda la parte inferior restante de un canela pálido u oscuro en algunos ejemplares. Subcaudales de igual coloración y en algunos ejemplares con verniculaciones transversales negras. Axilares y subalares canela pálido (Jaramillo 2005). Aspectos Reproductivos Nidifican en el suelo, los nidos son rudimentarios.
    [Show full text]