DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix M: List of Citations Accepted and Rejected by ECOTOX Criteria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix M: List of Citations Accepted and Rejected by ECOTOX Criteria Appendix M: List of Citations Accepted and Rejected by ECOTOX Criteria. The citations in this appendix were considered for inclusion in ECOTOX. Citations include the ECOTOX Reference number, as well as rejection codes (if relevant). Reference in section H.1 include ETU (major degradate of mancozeb and maneb) related article accepted by ECOTOX and OPP and cited within this risk assessment and a brief description of the study. References in section H.2 were for articles relevant to mancozeb, maneb, and ETU, accepted by ECOTOX and OPP but were not cited within the risk assessment. References in section H.3 were articles relevant to mancozeb, maneb, and ETU related articles which were accepted by ECOTOX, but not by OPP. In order to be included in the ECOTOX database, papers must meet the following minimum criteria: (1) the toxic effects are related to single chemical exposure; (2) the toxic effects are on an aquatic or terrestrial plant or animal species; (3) there is a biological effect on live, whole organisms; (4) a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate is reported; and (5) there is an explicit duration of exposure. Section H.4 includes the list of exclusion terms and descriptions for citations not accepted by ECOTOX. For mancozeb, maneb, and ETU, there were hundreds of references that were not accepted by ECOTOX for one or more of the reasons included in section H.4. A full list of the citations reviewed and rejected by the criteria for ECOTOX is listed in section H.5. the toxic effects are related to single chemical exposure; the toxic effects are on an aquatic or terrestrial plant or animal species; there is a biological effect on live, whole organisms; a concurrent environmental chemical concentration/dose or application rate is reported; and there is an explicit duration of exposure. H.1. ECOTOX accepted study on ETU which was used qualitatively in the risk assessment. The bolded number preceding the citation represents the ECOTOX reference number. ECOTOX Record Number and Citation: 90116 George P.Datson, John M. Rogers, Donald J. Versteeg, Thomas D.Sabourin, Donald Baines, and Sarah S. Marsh- 1991. Interspecies Comparisons of A/D Ratios Are Not Constant across Species. Society of Toxicology. Purpose of Review (DP Barcode or Litigation): Litigation 1 Date of Review: August 15, 2007 Summary of Study Findings: Xenapus laevis adult female and developmental stages were exposed to ETU via water column under static water conditions with daily renewal for 4 days. The developmental stages were from the blastulation (shortly after fertilization) to the free swimming tadpole stage. The adult toxic endpoint observed for was mortality. Concentrations were 0, 500, and 1000 mg/liter with 5 adults per concentration. Developmental stages were assessed for morphological developmental, growth (length), and death during development. Developmental concentrations were 0, 100, 250, 500, 750, and 100 mg/liter with 40 embryos per concentration. No adverse affects were observed at the highest concentration tested. The reason this study can only be used in a qualitative basis is because there was no indication if the gel was removed from the organisms during the blastulation stage; therefore, there is uncertainty regarding the amount of test substance the organism was actually exposed to. Description of Use in Document (QUAL, QUAN, INV): Qualitative H.2. Articles relevant to mancozeb, maneb, and ETU, accepted by ECOTOX and OPP but were not cited within the risk assessment because endpoints were less sensitive than existing data. (H.2.) Mancozeb 1. Abbott, J. D., Bruton, B. D., and Patterson, C. L. (1991). Fungicidal Inhibition of Pollen Germination and Germ-Tube Elongation in Muskmelon. Hortscience 26: 529-530. EcoReference No.: 63745 Chemical of Concern: CuOH,MZB,CTN,BMY; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: REP; Rejection Code: OK(CuOH,BMY),NO CROP(MZB,CTN). 2. Agrawal, S. C. (1987). Fungicidal Control of Stem Blight of Pigeonpea Caused by Phytophthora- drechsleri-f-sp-Cajani. Indian J.Plant Prot. 15: 35-38. Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP (MZB). 3. Ahad, S. F., Ali, N., and Shah, M. (1992). Effect of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Fungicidal Sprays on Fruit Quality and Yield of Apple. Sarhad J.Agric. 8: 167-174. Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP (MZB). 4. Ahmed, I., Bashir, M., Khan, B., Hatim, M., and Sultani, M. I. (1987). Effect of Seed Dressing Fungicides on Yield and Yield Components of Wheat. Pak.J.Agric.Res. 8: 361-365. Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP (MZB). 5. Al Najjar, N. R. and Soliman, A. S. (1980). Cytological Effects of Fungicides I. Mitotic Effects of Vitavax-200 and Dithane S-60 on Wheat and Two Related Species. Cytologia (Tokyo) 45: 163-168. EcoReference No.: 46874 2 Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP(MZB). 6. Alabi, O. and Emechebe, A. M. (1990). Field Evaluation of Seed Treatment and Foliar Spray Fungicides for the Control of Cowpea Brown Blotch Induced by Colletotrichum capsici. Samaru J.Agric.Res. 7: 151-158. Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP (MZB). 7. Alagarsamy, G., Krishnamohan, G., and Jeyarajan, R. (1989). Field Evaluation of Fungicides Against Leaf Spot of Cotton Caused by Alternaria macrospora Zimm. Indian J.Plant Prot. 17: 105- 106. EcoReference No.: 90326 Chemical of Concern: MZB,CAP,Captan,IPD,TPM; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP; Rejection Code: OK(IPD,TPM),OK TARGET,NO CROP(CAP,MZB,Captan) . 8. Ali, S. A., Pathak, R. K., and Saraf, R. K. (1998). Fungicidal Seed Treatment in Coriander. Adv.Plant Sci. 11: 303-304. EcoReference No.: 90455 Chemical of Concern: CBD,Captan,THM,MZB; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP; Rejection Code: OK(CBD,THM),OK TARGET(Captan,MZB). 9. Allen, T. W., Enebak, S. A., and Carey, W. A. (2004). Evaluation of Fungicides for Control of Species of Fusarium on Longleaf Pine Seed. Crop Prot. 23: 979-982. EcoReference No.: 90919 Chemical of Concern: BMY,DFC,MZB,TBA; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: REP,POP; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MZB). 10. Amer, M. A., Hoorne, D., and Poppe, J. (1993). In-Vivo Evaluation of Adjuvants for More Effective Control of Celery Leaf-Spot Septoria-apiicola and Powdery Mildew Erysiphe-graminis of Wheat with Fungicides. In: 3rd Int.Symp.on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals, Aug.3-7, 1992, Cambridge, England, UK, Pestic.Sci. 37: 113-120. Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP (MZB). 11. Andrieu, N., Jaworska, G., Genet, J.-L., and Bompeix, G. (2001). Biological Mode of Action of Famoxadone on Plasmopara viticola and Phytophthora infestans. Crop Prot. 20: 253-260. EcoReference No.: 90210 Chemical of Concern: FDN,AZX,FZM,DMH,CMX,MZB; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP,REP; Rejection Code: OK TARGET(MZB),OK(FDN,AZX,FZM,DMH,CMX). 12. Arauz, L. F. and Sutton, T. B. (1990). Protectant and After-Infection Activity of Fungicides Against Botryosphaeria obtusa on Apple. Plant Dis. 74: 1029-1034. EcoReference No.: 90001 Chemical of Concern: BMY,BTN,FUZ,MZB,TEZ; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: GRO; Rejection Code: OK TARGET(MZB). 13. Atamanalp, M. and Yanik, T. (2003). Alterations in Hematological Parameters of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Exposed to Mancozeb. Turk.J.Vet.Anim.Sci. 27: 1213-1217. EcoReference No.: 72218 Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: CEL; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL 3 CODED(MZB). 14. Atwood, S. T., Sheets, T. J., Sutton, T. B., and Leidy, R. B. (1987). Stability of Selected Pesticide Formulations and Combinations in Aqueous Media. J.Agric.Food Chem. 35: 169-172. EcoReference No.: 90321 Chemical of Concern: AZ,MZB,Captan,PSM,CPY; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: ACC,REP,GRO; Rejection Code: OK(AZ,PSM,CPY),OK TARGET(MZB,Captan). 15. Babu, T. R. and Azam, K. M. (1987). Toxicity of Different Fungicides to Adult Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Crop Prot. 6: 161-162. EcoReference No.: 77522 Chemical of Concern: CBD,TDF,MZB,CuS,CAP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(TDF,CAP,MZB),OK(CBD),NO MIXTURE(CuS). 16. Bajet, N. B., Renfro, B. L., and Valdez Carrasco, J. M. (1994). Control of Tar Spot of Maize and Its Effect on Yield. Int.J.Pest Manag. 40: 121-125. EcoReference No.: 76494 Chemical of Concern: MZB,CBD,Captan,PCZ; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP,PHY; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(PCZ),OK(CBD,Captan),NO CROP(MZB,Captan). 17. Balamuralikrishnan, M. and Jeyarajan, R. (1998). Effects of Fenarimol Sprays on Powdery Mildew Incidence in Grapevine. J.Mycol.Plant Pathol. 28: 181-188. Chemical of Concern: MZB; Habitat: T; Rejection Code: NO CROP (MZB). 18. Ballal, C. R. and Kumar, P. (1991). Differential Response of Allorhogas pyralophagus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to Various Pesticides. Indian J.Agric.Sci. 61: 78-79. EcoReference No.: 90487 Chemical of Concern: DCF,PHSL,OXD,DMT,ES,CYP,MZB,Zineb,PPHD,FNT,DCM,FNV; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: MOR,BEH,REP,POP; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MZB),OK(ALL CHEMS),OK TARGET(DMT). 19. Barwal, R. N. and Gupta, D. K. (1991). Seasonal Incidence and Control of Pod Borer (Euborellia annulipes) and Cercospora Leaf Spots in Groundnut. Indian J.Plant Prot. 19: 156-160. EcoReference No.: 89847 Chemical of Concern: HCCH,CBL,MP,HPT,AND,CBD,MZB,Zineb,Ziram,CTN; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP,REP; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MZB,CTN),OK(ALL CHEMS). 20. Bashir, M. and Ilyas, M. B. (1986). Evaluation of Fungicides Against Ascochyta Gram Blight. Pak.J.Bot. 18: 147-152. EcoReference No.: 70579 Chemical of Concern: TDF,TBA,BMY,CBX,CTN,MZB,PNB,Dino; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MZB,CTN),OK(ALL CHEMS).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Properties of Chemicals Volume 2
    1 t ENVIRONMENTAL 1 PROTECTION Esa Nikunen . Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 1 O O O O O O O O OO O OOOOOO Ol OIOOO FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE • EDITA Esa Nikunen e Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 HELSINKI 1000 OlO 00000001 00000000000000000 Th/s is a second revfsed version of Environmental Properties of Chemica/s, published by VAPK-Pub/ishing and Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Department as Research Report 91, 1990. The pubiication is also available as a CD ROM version: EnviChem 2.0, a PC database runniny under Windows operating systems. ISBN 951-7-2967-2 (publisher) ISBN 952-7 1-0670-0 (co-publisher) ISSN 1238-8602 Layout: Pikseri Julkaisupalvelut Cover illustration: Jussi Hirvi Edita Ltd. Helsinki 2000 Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 _____ _____________________________________________________ Contents . VOLUME ONE 1 Contents of the report 2 Environmental properties of chemicals 3 Abbreviations and explanations 7 3.1 Ways of exposure 7 3.2 Exposed species 7 3.3 Fffects________________________________ 7 3.4 Length of exposure 7 3.5 Odour thresholds 8 3.6 Toxicity endpoints 9 3.7 Other abbreviations 9 4 Listofexposedspecies 10 4.1 Mammais 10 4.2 Plants 13 4.3 Birds 14 4.4 Insects 17 4.5 Fishes 1$ 4.6 Mollusca 22 4.7 Crustaceans 23 4.8 Algae 24 4.9 Others 25 5 References 27 Index 1 List of chemicals in alphabetical order - 169 Index II List of chemicals in CAS-number order
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Toxicology
    GINTARAS DAUNORAS VETERINARY TOXICOLOGY Lecture notes and classes works Study kit for LUHS Veterinary Faculty Foreign Students LSMU LEIDYBOS NAMAI, KAUNAS 2012 Lietuvos sveikatos moksl ų universitetas Veterinarijos akademija Neužkre čiam ųjų lig ų katedra Gintaras Daunoras VETERINARIN Ė TOKSIKOLOGIJA Paskait ų konspektai ir praktikos darb ų aprašai Mokomoji knyga LSMU Veterinarijos fakulteto užsienio studentams LSMU LEIDYBOS NAMAI, KAUNAS 2012 UDK Dau Apsvarstyta: LSMU VA Veterinarijos fakulteto Neužkre čiam ųjų lig ų katedros pos ėdyje, 2012 m. rugs ėjo 20 d., protokolo Nr. 01 LSMU VA Veterinarijos fakulteto tarybos pos ėdyje, 2012 m. rugs ėjo 28 d., protokolo Nr. 08 Recenzavo: doc. dr. Alius Pockevi čius LSMU VA Užkre čiam ųjų lig ų katedra dr. Aidas Grigonis LSMU VA Neužkre čiam ųjų lig ų katedra CONTENTS Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 SECTION I. Lecture notes ………………………………………………………………………. 8 1. GENERAL VETERINARY TOXICOLOGY ……….……………………………………….. 8 1.1. Veterinary toxicology aims and tasks ……………………………………………………... 8 1.2. EC and Lithuanian legal documents for hazardous substances and pollution ……………. 11 1.3. Classification of poisons ……………………………………………………………………. 12 1.4. Chemicals classification and labelling ……………………………………………………… 14 2. Toxicokinetics ………………………………………………………………………...………. 15 2.2. Migration of substances through biological membranes …………………………………… 15 2.3. ADME notion ………………………………………………………………………………. 15 2.4. Possibilities of poisons entering into an animal body and methods of absorption ……… 16 2.5. Poison distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Composition Comprising Propamocarb-Fosetylate and an Insecticide Active Substance
    (19) & (11) EP 2 255 638 A2 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 01.12.2010 Bulletin 2010/48 A01N 57/12 (2006.01) A01N 59/06 (2006.01) A01N 43/90 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 10167840.7 (22) Date of filing: 21.12.2007 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventors: AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR • Van den Eynde, Koen HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE B-1785 Merchtem (BE) SI SK TR • Andrieux, Marc Designated Extension States: 40699 Erkrath (DE) AL BA HR MK RS • Hundenberg, Heike 40764, Langenfeld (DE) (30) Priority: 22.12.2006 EP 06127172 • Thielert, Wolfgang 51519 Odenthal (DE) (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in •Suty-Heinze, Anne accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 40764 Langenfeld (DE) 07858039.6 / 2 124 566 Remarks: (71) Applicant: Bayer CropScience AG This application was filed on 30-06-2010 as a 40789 Monheim (DE) divisional application to the application mentioned under INID code 62. (54) Pesticide composition comprising propamocarb-fosetylate and an insecticide active substance (57) The present invention relates to a pesticide com- invention is a pesticide composition based on propamo- position intended for protecting plants, crops or seeds carb-fosetylate, an insecticide active substance and op- against phyto-pathogenic fungi or damaging insects, and tionally a further fungicide active substance. the corresponding methods of treatment using the said composition. More precisely, the subject of the present EP 2 255 638 A2 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 255 638 A2 Description [0001] The present invention relates to a pesticide composition intended for protecting plants, crops or seeds against fungal diseases or insect damages, and the corresponding methods of protection by application of the said composition.
    [Show full text]
  • At Harvard College
    Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology AT HARVARD COLLEGE Vol. LXXXII, No. 5 THE FULGORINA OF BARRO COLORADO AND OTHER PARTS OF PANAMA By Z. P. Metcalf College of Agriculture and Engineering of the University of North Carolina With Twenty-thhee Plates CAMBRIDGE, MASS., U.S.A. PRINTED FOR THE MUSEUM October, 1938 No. 5.— The Fulgorina of Barro Colorado and Other Parts of Panama By Z. P. Metcalf In the summer of 1924 Mr. Nathan Banks, Curator of Insects of the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard University spent some time collecting insects on Barro Colorado Island, Gatun Lake, Canal Zone. Among these was a large number of Fulgorids. These he turned over to me for study. At about the same time Mr. C. H. Curran, Assistant Curator of Insect Life of the American Museum of Natural History called my attention to a number of Fulgorids in their collec- tions from Barro Colorado. Still later Mr. Paul Oman, Curator of Homoptera of the United States National Museum, separated the material in their collections from Barro Colorado and sent it to me for study. These three collections together with a considerable collection which I have from Central and South America formed the nucleus for a report which would supplement the reports of Distant and Fowler in the Biologia. I suggested this to Mr. Banks and he agreed to its publication. CLASSIFICATION USED In the present report I have used the general classification developed recently by Muir (1930c) and have supplemented this general classi- fication with special works in more restricted groups especially the work of Melichar, Muir, Schmidt and Jacobi.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) Julie M Urban1* and Jason R Cryan2
    Urban and Cryan BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:87 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/87 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Two ancient bacterial endosymbionts have coevolved with the planthoppers (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) Julie M Urban1* and Jason R Cryan2 Abstract Background: Members of the hemipteran suborder Auchenorrhyncha (commonly known as planthoppers, tree- and leafhoppers, spittlebugs, and cicadas) are unusual among insects known to harbor endosymbiotic bacteria in that they are associated with diverse assemblages of bacterial endosymbionts. Early light microscopic surveys of species representing the two major lineages of Auchenorrhyncha (the planthopper superfamily Fulgoroidea; and Cicadomorpha, comprising Membracoidea [tree- and leafhoppers], Cercopoidea [spittlebugs], and Cicadoidea [cicadas]), found that most examined species harbored at least two morphologically distinct bacterial endosymbionts, and some harbored as many as six. Recent investigations using molecular techniques have identified multiple obligate bacterial endosymbionts in Cicadomorpha; however, much less is known about endosymbionts of Fulgoroidea. In this study, we present the initial findings of an ongoing PCR-based survey (sequencing 16S rDNA) of planthopper-associated bacteria to document endosymbionts with a long-term history of codiversification with their fulgoroid hosts. Results: Results of PCR surveys and phylogenetic analyses of 16S rDNA recovered a monophyletic clade of Betaproteobacteria associated with planthoppers; this clade included Vidania fulgoroideae, a recently described bacterium identified in exemplars of the planthopper family Cixiidae. We surveyed 77 planthopper species representing 18 fulgoroid families, and detected Vidania in 40 species (representing 13 families). Further, we detected the Sulcia endosymbiont (identified as an obligate endosymbiont of Auchenorrhyncha in previous studies) in 30 of the 40 species harboring Vidania.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression and Functional Analysis of the Propamocarb-Related Gene
    Liu et al. BMC Plant Biology (2018) 18:16 DOI 10.1186/s12870-018-1236-2 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Expression and functional analysis of the Propamocarb-related gene CsDIR16 in cucumbers Chunhong Liu1,2, Zhiwei Qin1*, Xiuyan Zhou1, Ming Xin1, Chunhua Wang1, Dong Liu1 and Shengnan Li1 Abstract Background: Cucumber downy mildew is among the most important diseases that can disrupt cucumber production. Propamocarb, also known as propyl-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbamate (PM), is a systemic carbamate fungicide pesticide that is widely applied in agricultural production because of its high efficiency of pathogens control, especially cucumber downy mildew. However, residual PM can remain in cucumbers after the disease has been controlled. To explore the molecular mechanisms of PM retention, cucumber cultivars ‘D9320’ (with the highest residual PM content) and ‘D0351’ (lowest residual PM content) were studied. High-throughput tag-sequencing (Tag-Seq) results showed that the CsDIR16 gene was related to PM residue, which was verified using transgenic technology. Results: We investigated the activity of a dirigent cucumber protein encoded by the CsDIR16 in gene response to stress induced by PM treatment. Gene-expression levels of CsDIR16 were up-regulated in the fruits, leaves, and stems of ‘D0351’ plants in response to PM treatment. However, in cultivar ‘D9320’, CsDIR16 levels were down-regulated in the leaves and stems after PM treatment, with no statistically significant differences observed in the fruits. Induction by jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, polyethylene glycol 4000, NaCl, and Corynespora cassiicola Wei (Cor) resulted in CsDIR16 up-regulation in ‘D0351’ and ‘D9320’. Expression after salicylic acid treatment was up-regulated in ‘D0351’, but was down-regulated in ‘D9320’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insecticides Act, 1968 (Act No.46 of 1968)
    The Insecticides Act, 1968 (Act No.46 of 1968) An Act to regulate the import, manufactures, sale, transport, distribution and use of insecticides with a view to prevent risk to human beings or animals and for matters connected therewith. [2 nd September 1968] Be it enacted by Parliament in the Nineteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows: 1. Short title, extent and commencement. * a. This Act may be called the Insecticides Act, 1968. b. It extends to the whole of India. c. It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, appoint and different dates may be appointed for different States and for different provisions of Act. 2. Application of other laws not barred * The provisions of this Act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other law for the time being in force. 3. Definitions- In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires- a. "animals" means animals useful to human beings and includes fish and fowl, and such kinds of wild life as the Central Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, specify, being kinds which in its opinion, it is desirable to protect or preserve; b. "Board" means the Central Insecticides Board constituted under Sec.4; c. "Central Insecticides Laboratory" means the Central Insecticides Laboratory established, or as the case may be, the institution specified under Sec.16; d. "Import" means bringing into any place within the territories to which this Act extends from a place outside those territories; e. "Insecticide" means- i.
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Division Conventional Pesticides -Branch and Product
    Registration Division Conventional Pesticides - Branch and Product Manager (PM) Assignments For a list of Branch contacts, please click the following link: http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-contacts/contacts-office-pesticide-programs-registration-division Branch FB=Fungicide Branch. FHB=Fungicide Herbicide Branch. HB=Herbicide Branch. Abbreviations: IVB*= Invertebrate-Vertebrate Branch 1, 2 or 3. MUERB=Minor Use and Emergency Response Branch. Chemical Branch PM 1-Decanol FHB RM 20 1-Naphthaleneacetamide FHB RM 20 2, 4-D, Choline salt HB RM 23 2,4-D HB RM 23 2,4-D, 2-ethylhexyl ester HB RM 23 2,4-D, butoxyethyl ester HB RM 23 2,4-D, diethanolamine salt HB RM 23 2,4-D, dimethylamine salt HB RM 23 2,4-D, isopropyl ester HB RM 23 2,4-D, isopropylamine salt HB RM 23 2,4-D, sodium salt HB RM 23 2,4-D, triisopropanolamine salt HB RM 23 2,4-DB HB RM 23 2,4-DP HB RM 23 2,4-DP, diethanolamine salt HB RM 23 2,4-DP-p HB RM 23 2,4-DP-p, 2-ethylhexyl ester FB RM 21 2,4-DP-p, DMA salt HB RM 23 2-EEEBC FB RM 21 2-Phenylethyl propionate FHB RM 20 4-Aminopyridine IVB3 RM 07 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid FB RM 22 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide IVB3 RM 07 Abamectin IVB3 RM 07 Acephate IVB2 RM 10 Acequinocyl IVB3 RM 01 Acetaminophen IVB3 RM 07 Acetamiprid IVB3 RM 01 Acetic acid, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-, compd. with methanamine (1:1) HB RM 23 Acetic acid, trifluoro- FHB RM 20 Acetochlor HB RM 25 Acibenzolar-s-methyl FHB RM 24 Acid Blue 9 HB RM 23 Acid Yellow 23 HB RM 23 Sunday, June 06, 2021 Page 1 of 17 Chemical Branch PM Acifluorfen HB RM 23 Acrinathrin IVB1 RM 03
    [Show full text]
  • Case Fatality As an Indicator for the Human Toxicity of Pesticides—A
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Case Fatality as an Indicator for the Human Toxicity of Pesticides—A Systematic Scoping Review on the Availability and Variability of Severity Indicators of Pesticide Poisoning Susanne Moebus 1 and Wolfgang Boedeker 2,* 1 Institute for Urban Public Health, University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45128 Essen, Germany; [email protected] 2 EPICURUS—Impact Assessment, 45136 Essen, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Objective: To investigate if case fatality and other indicators of the severity of human pesticide poisonings can be used to prioritize pesticides of public health concern. To study the heterogeneity of data across countries, cause of poisonings, and treatment facilities. Methods: We searched literature databases as well as the internet for studies on case-fatality and severity scores of pesticide poisoning. Studies published between 1990 and 2014 providing information on active ingredients in pesticides or chemical groups of active ingredients were included. The variability of case-fatality-ratios was analyzed by computing the coefficient of variation as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. Findings: A total of 149 papers were identified of which 67 could be included after assessment. Case-fatality-ratio (CFR) on 66 active ingredients and additionally on 13 groups of active ingredients were reported from 20 countries. The overall median CFR for group Citation: Moebus, S.; Boedeker, W. of pesticides was 9%, for single pesticides 8%. Of those 12 active ingredients with a CFR above 20% Case Fatality as an Indicator for the more than half are WHO-classified as “moderately hazardous” or “unlikely to present acute hazard”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae) by Optimizing Field Work Surveys with Citizen Science Involvement Through Facebook Networking and Data Access in FLOW Website
    Belgian Journal of Entomology 37 : 1-16 (2016) ISSN : 2295-0214 www.srbe-kbve.be urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA852E68-BCE4-4735-BF5D-A63F5D33B5F3 Belgian Journal of Entomology Updating lanternflies biodiversity knowledge in Cambodia (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae) by optimizing field work surveys with citizen science involvement through Facebook networking and data access in FLOW website 1 2 3 Jérôme CONSTANT , Sophany PHAUK & ThierryBOURGOIN 1 Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, O.D. Phylogeny and Taxonomy, Entomology, Vautier street 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium (corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6E6072A1-9415-4C8D-8E60-2504444DB290 2 Royal University of Phnom Penh, Cambodian Entomology Initiatives, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Cambodia (e-mail: [email protected]) 3 Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 MNHN-CNRS-UPMC-EPHE, CP50, 57 rue Cuvier, F-75231, Paris cedex 5, France (e-mail: [email protected]) Published : Brussels, January 20, 2016 Constant J., Phauk S. & Bourgoin T. Cambodian lanternflies and Facebook (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Updating lanternflies biodiversity knowledge in Cambodia (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae) by optimizing field work surveys with citizen science involvement through Facebook networking and data access in FLOW website Jérôme CONSTANT, Sophany PHAUK & Thierry BOURGOIN ISSN : 1374-5514 (Print Edition) ISSN : 2295-0214 (Online Edition) Le Belgian Journal of Entomolgy est édité par la Société royale belge d'Entomologie, association sans but lucratif, fondée le 9 avril 1855. Siège social : rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Bruxelles De Belgian Journal of Entomology is uitgegeven door de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Entomologie, vereniging zonder winstoogmerk, opgericht op 9 april 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • FQPA: Economic Impact on Potatoes, Onions, Cabbage and Watermelon Produced in Texas
    E-36 3-00 FQPA: Economic Impact on Potatoes, Onions, Cabbage and Watermelon Produced in Texas Kent D. Hall and Rodney L. Holloway* *Extension Associate, Pesticide Assessment; and Associate Professor and Extension Pesticide Assessment Specialist, The Texas A&M University System. i Figure 1. Map of Texas displaying the major growing areas of the study. ii CONTENTS Executive Summary. .. 1 Introduction .................................................................. 2 Methods ..................................................................... 3 Results...................................................................... 4 Potatoes ............................................................... 5 Insects and Insecticides ............................................. 5 High Plains................................................. 5 Winter Garden.............................................. 6 Lower Rio Grande Valley ..................................... 6 All of Texas................................................ 7 Weeds and Herbicides.............................................. 7 High Plains................................................. 7 Winter Garden.............................................. 7 Lower Rio Grande Valley ..................................... 8 All of Texas................................................ 8 Diseases and Fungicides ............................................ 8 High Plains................................................. 8 Winter Garden.............................................. 9 Lower Rio Grande
    [Show full text]
  • Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete The
    Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 2018 Assess ment Report Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer Ozone Secretariat MONTREAL PROTOCOL ON SUBSTANCES THAT DEPLETE THE OZONE LAYER 2018 REPORT OF THE METHYL BROMIDE TECHNICAL OPTIONS COMMITTEE 2018 Assessment Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 2018 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 2018 Assessment The text of this report is composed mainly in Times New Roman. Composition of the Report: Methyl Bromide Technical Option Committee Coordination: Marta Pizano, Ian Porter, MBTOC Co-Chairs. Final editing and layout: Marta Pizano, Ian Porter, MBTOC co-chairs Reproduction: Ozone Secretariat, Nairobi Date: January, 2019 Under certain conditions, printed copies of this report are available from: United Nations Environment Programme Ozone Secretariat P.O. Box 30552 Nairobi, Kenya This document is also available in portable document format from: https://ozone.unep.org/science/assessment/teap No copyright involved. This publication may be freely copied, abstracted and cited, with acknowledgement of the source of the material. Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee: Co-Chairs: Marta Pizano (Colombia); Ian Porter (Australia) Members: Jonathan Banks (Australia), Mohammed Besri (Morocco), Fred Bergwerff (The Netherlands), Aocheng Cao (China), Sait Erurk (Turkey), Ken Glassey (New Zealand), Alfredo Gonzalez (Philippines), Rosalind James (USA), Takashi Misumi (Japan), Christoph Reichmuth (Germany), Jordi Riudavets (Spain), Akio Tateya (Japan), Alejandro Valeiro (Argentina), Nick Vink (South Africa). Acknowledgments: MBTOC acknowledges support from Dr Paul Fraser, Dr Steve Montzka and Nada Derek for Chapter 4 of this report in assisting with preparation of some text, figures and review of information.
    [Show full text]