33-35 Commercial Road, Whitechapel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

33-35 Commercial Road, Whitechapel planning report PDU/1451a/02 29 June 2010 33-35 Commercial Road, Whitechapel in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning application nos. PA/08/01034/FUL & PA/08/01035/LBC Strategic planning application stage II referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Demolition of all buildings on site except for the former St. George’s Brewery and Assam Street Warehouse and redevelopment for student housing-led mixed use development comprising a 19- storey building for student accommodation, refurbishment of St. George’s Brewery for offices and/or non-residential institution uses, refurbishment of Assam Street Warehouse for student accommodation, three and 6-storey buildings along Commercial Road for retail and/or office uses, and associated access and landscaping works. The application for planning permission is accompanied by an application for listed building consent relating to the alterations to the grade II listed former brewery. The applicant The applicant is Broadstone Ltd, and the architect is Burland TM Architects. Strategic issues Outstanding issues relating to land use, urban design, inclusive access, strategic views, climate change, transport and employment have been satisfactorily addressed. Recommendation That Tower Hamlets Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 24 July 2008 the Mayor of London received documents from Tower Hamlets Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. This was referred to the Mayor under Categories 1B and 1C of the Schedule to the Order 2008: “Development…which comprises or includes the erection of a building or buildings…in Central London (other than the City of London) and with a total floorspace of more than 20,000 square metres” and ”Development which comprises or includes the erection of a building…more than 30 metres high and outside the City of London.” page 1 2 On 3 September 2008 the Mayor considered planning report PDU/1451/01, and subsequently advised Tower Hamlets Council that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 75 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 77 of that report could address these deficiencies. 3 A copy of the above-mentioned report is attached. The essentials of the case with regard to the proposal, the site, case history, strategic planning issues and relevant policies and guidance are as set out therein, unless otherwise stated in this report. Since then, the application has been revised in response to the Mayor’s concerns (see below). On 16 March 2010 Tower Hamlets Council decided that it was minded to grant planning permission for the revised application, and on 18 June 2010 it advised the Mayor of this decision. Under the provisions of Article 5 of the Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor may allow the draft decision to proceed unchanged, direct Tower Hamlets Council under Article 6 to refuse the application or issue a direction to Tower Hamlets Council under Article 7 that he is to act as the Local Planning Authority for the purposes of determining the application and any connected application. The Mayor has until 1 July 2010 to notify the Council of his decision and to issue any direction. 4 The environmental information for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 has been taken into account in the consideration of this case. 5 The decision on this case, and the reasons will be made available on the GLA’s website www.london.gov.uk. Update 6 At the consultation stage Tower Hamlets Council was advised that the application did not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 75 of the above-mentioned report; but that the possible remedies set out in paragraph 77 of that report could address these deficiencies: Urban design and built heritage: the applicant should provide more information relating to proposed materials and elevational treatment, particularly for the flank elevations of the student bedroom clusters in the tower. Inclusive access: the applicant is urged to increase the proportion of wheelchair accessible student bedrooms. Strategic views: the applicant needs to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the proposed development on strategic views designated in the LVMF. The acceptability of the proposed development will then be assessed against London Plan policy 4B.18. Climate change mitigation and adaptation: the energy strategy should be revised in accordance with paragraphs 33 to 42 above. Firmer commitments in relation to climate change adaptation and sustainability measures need to be provided. Transport: the applicant should address the matters raised in relation to disabled car parking, the impact of the construction of the development, improving pedestrian and cycle accessibility and the provision of travel plans. Employment: further consideration should be given to how the proposals can improve the skills and employment opportunities for Londoners to comply with London Plan policy 3B.11. page 2 Land use 7 At consultation stage the principle of the proposed development, comprising student housing, office and retail uses, was accepted, but the applicant was requested to clarify existing and proposed floorspace figures in order to enable a clearer understanding of the proposed land use changes. The applicant has subsequently clarified that there is currently around 8,000 sq.m. of floorspace on the site, of which 3,000 sq.m. is office floorspace and 5,000 sq.m. is retail warehousing. The proposed mix of uses comprises 15,372 sq.m. of student housing, 3,142 sq.m. of B1 office floorspace and a further 1,071 of flexible retail (A1), office (B1) or community (D1) use, plus 1,686 sq.m. of ancillary plant and storage space. 8 The proposal will result in a small increase in the quantity of office floorspace on the site, which is welcomed. It will, however, result in a net loss of retail space. The existing retail space on the site is poor quality and several units are vacant. It does not make a positive contribution to the local area and is not strategically significant to this part of the Central Activities Zone. As such, and taking into account the wider regenerative benefits of the scheme, there is no objection to its loss. 9 Since stage one the draft replacement London Plan has been published for consultation and is currently undergoing Examination in Public. Whilst the principle of student accommodation in this location continues to be supported in line with the objectives of the draft City Fringe OAPF and the Council’s Aldgate Masterplan, paragraph 3.45 of the draft replacement London Plan states that “unless student accommodation is secured through planning agreement for occupation by members of specified educational institutions for the predominant part of the year, it will normally be subject to the requirements of affordable housing policy.” However, this was not prevailing planning policy when the application was considered at stage one and was not therefore raised as an issue at that time. It should also be noted that the scheme is in close proximity to London Metropolitan University and that the Council has identified Aldgate as a location in which higher education uses will be supported towards the formation of a hub or cluster of such uses. In these circumstances, a direction to refuse planning permission based on the lack of an affordable housing contribution would be difficult to sustain. Given the particular history and circumstances of the case the proposals are on balance considered acceptable. Urban design 10 At consultation stage, the principle of a tall building (18 storeys) in this location was accepted by virtue of its location within an emerging cluster of tall buildings at Aldgate, including the consented 61-75 Alie Street (27 storeys), 52-58 Commercial Road (17 storeys) and Aldgate Union 3&4 (22 storeys). Further information was, however, sought in respect of the materials and detailing of the tower in order to ensure that it will meet the high architectural standards demanded by London Plan policy 4B.10. 11 In response to comments made by the Council, CABE and the GLA, the applicant has revised the scheme. The introduction of a lighter wrap-over secondary wall and the revised expression of the four supporting flank walls down to ground level has been largely successful in strengthening the structural expression of the tower. Refinements have also been made to the top of the tower, with the wrapping of the non structural walls to cover the roof top amenity spaces; this is welcomed. It is disappointing that the flank walls themselves remain blank, but there remains an opportunity to create texture and visual interest to these elevations through the use of a finely grained brick which will be submitted and approved by condition. page 3 Inclusive access 12 Given the shortage of wheelchair accessible student accommodation in London, at consultation stage the applicant was urged to increase amount of fully wheelchair accessible bedrooms from 5% to 10%. The applicant has resisted this but has confirmed that there is sufficient flexibility within the internal layouts for future adaptation for wheelchair users, should the demand arise. This can be accepted in line with London Plan policy 4B.5. Strategic views 13 The applicant has undertaken further work to address the concerns raised in relation to the inadequacy of the townscape and visual impact assessment, in particular its failure to demonstrate the impact of the proposed development on the strategic view from City Hall to the Tower of London (LVMF views 25).
Recommended publications
  • 15 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    15 bus time schedule & line map 15 Trafalgar Square - Blackwall View In Website Mode The 15 bus line (Trafalgar Square - Blackwall) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Blackwall: 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM (2) Trafalgar Square: 12:10 AM - 11:55 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 15 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 15 bus arriving. Direction: Blackwall 15 bus Time Schedule 32 stops Blackwall Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM Monday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM Charing Cross Stn / Trafalgar Square (F) 11 Strand, London Tuesday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM Southampton Street / Covent Garden (A) Wednesday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM 390 Strand, London Thursday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM Aldwych (D) Friday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM Strand Underpass, London Saturday 12:00 AM - 11:50 PM The Royal Courts Of Justice (L) 265 Strand, London Fetter Lane (E) 167 Fleet Street, London 15 bus Info Direction: Blackwall Ludgate Circus (E) Stops: 32 85 Fleet Street, London Trip Duration: 46 min Line Summary: Charing Cross Stn / Trafalgar Square Ludgate Hill / Old Bailey (G) (F), Southampton Street / Covent Garden (A), Ludgate Hill, London Aldwych (D), The Royal Courts Of Justice (L), Fetter Lane (E), Ludgate Circus (E), Ludgate Hill / Old Bailey St Paul's Cathedral (SK) (G), St Paul's Cathedral (SK), Mansion House Station (ME), Cannon Street (MB), Monument Station (H), Mansion House Station (ME) Great Tower Street (TU), The Tower Of London (Tb), 33 Cannon Street, London Mansell Street (S), Aldgate East Station (H), London
    [Show full text]
  • PDU Case Report XXXX/YY Date
    planning report D&P/3147/01 5 March 2014 100 Whitechapel Road Land and Building Fronting Fieldgate Street & Vine Court, London, E1 1JG in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning application no. PA/13/03049 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Demolition of existing vehicle workshop and erection of extension to the prayer hall at the East London Mosque, residential development comprising 241 open market and affordable housing units including studio, one, two, three and four bedroom apartments in buildings up to 18 storeys, basement parking, public realm improvements, pedestrian link from Fieldgate Street to Whitechapel Road. The applicant The applicant is Alyjiso and Fieldgate Ltd. and the architect is Webb Gray. Strategic issues The development of this mixed-use scheme accommodates both the extension of the East London Mosque and residential uses on a constrained site within the City Fringe Opportunity Area. The proposal is broadly in accordance with strategic planning policy, and is supported. However, further discussion is required regarding housing quality, children’s play space provision, inclusive design, sustainability and transport. Recommendation That Tower Hamlets Council be advised that while the application is generally acceptable in strategic planning terms the application does not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 86 of this report; but that the possible remedies set out in this paragraph could address these deficiencies. Context 1 On the 20 January 2014 the Mayor of London received documents from Tower Hamlets Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Davenant Foundation School Foundation School
    DAVENANT DAVENANT FOUNDATION SCHOOL FOUNDATION SCHOOL Chester Road, Loughton, Essex IG10 2LD. Telephone: 020 8508 0404 Facsimile: 020 8508 9301 E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @DavenantFS @Davenant6thform “a community based firmly on Christian principles” Ofsted “parental commitment and support are significant factors in the school’s success” Ofsted “the school’s extra curricular provision is particularly strong” Ofsted www.davenantschool.co.uk Nurturing Mind, Body and Spirit Produced by: The School Brochure Specialist, FM Litho Design and Print. Tel: 01787 479479 • [email protected] • www.fmlitho.co.uk DAVENANT “a Christian school valuing the past with a vision of the future” It has been over fifty years since Davenant moved from Whitechapel to our present site, here in Loughton. The school has grown to be a highly regarded, Christian ecumenical school achieving excellent results for students of all abilities. Students, staff and the wider community work very hard to make Davenant a successful school. We see ourselves as a community that promotes individual excellence and nurtures the God given potential within each of us. Our ethos is based firmly on the commitment to “nurture mind, body and spirit” and, therefore, we work hard to ensure each student not only achieves their academic potential but also has a range of opportunities to be enriched and to enjoy new experiences away from the classroom. Also, Davenant is highly regarded for the work done in training and developing teachers so that our students receive the high quality teaching they deserve. Our expectations of each other are high. We demand a great deal of our students-hard work, the desire to learn, a determination to succeed and a willingness to contribute fully to the life of the school.
    [Show full text]
  • SAVED by the BELL ! the RESURRECTION of the WHITECHAPEL BELL FOUNDRY a Proposal by Factum Foundation & the United Kingdom Historic Building Preservation Trust
    SAVED BY THE BELL ! THE RESURRECTION OF THE WHITECHAPEL BELL FOUNDRY a proposal by Factum Foundation & The United Kingdom Historic Building Preservation Trust Prepared by Skene Catling de la Peña June 2018 Robeson House, 10a Newton Road, London W2 5LS Plaques on the wall above the old blacksmith’s shop, honouring the lives of foundry workers over the centuries. Their bells still ring out through London. A final board now reads, “Whitechapel Bell Foundry, 1570-2017”. Memorial plaques in the Bell Foundry workshop honouring former workers. Cover: Whitechapel Bell Foundry Courtyard, 2016. Photograph by John Claridge. Back Cover: Chains in the Whitechapel Bell Foundry, 2016. Photograph by John Claridge. CONTENTS Overview – Executive Summary 5 Introduction 7 1 A Brief History of the Bell Foundry in Whitechapel 9 2 The Whitechapel Bell Foundry – Summary of the Situation 11 3 The Partners: UKHBPT and Factum Foundation 12 3 . 1 The United Kingdom Historic Building Preservation Trust (UKHBPT) 12 3 . 2 Factum Foundation 13 4 A 21st Century Bell Foundry 15 4 .1 Scanning and Input Methods 19 4 . 2 Output Methods 19 4 . 3 Statements by Participating Foundrymen 21 4 . 3 . 1 Nigel Taylor of WBF – The Future of the Whitechapel Bell Foundry 21 4 . 3 . 2 . Andrew Lacey – Centre for the Study of Historical Casting Techniques 23 4 . 4 Digital Restoration 25 4 . 5 Archive for Campanology 25 4 . 6 Projects for the Whitechapel Bell Foundry 27 5 Architectural Approach 28 5 .1 Architectural Approach to the Resurrection of the Bell Foundry in Whitechapel – Introduction 28 5 . 2 Architects – Practice Profiles: 29 Skene Catling de la Peña 29 Purcell Architects 30 5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Limehouse, E1 Ideal for Direct Access to Central London
    Limehouse, E1 Ideal for direct access to central London Marlin Limehouse, 577 Commercial Road, London E1 0HJ Telephone: +44 (0)20 7378 4840 Website: www.marlinapartments.com Marlin Limehouse is cleverly situated just outside the hustle and bustle of central London but within easy access to the financial and tourist centres of London. Due to its location just outside the city centre, it is one of our most versatile properties offering high quality serviced accommodation nearby the City, Canary Wharf and the West End. Located moments from the DLR, Limehouse is just five minutes from Bank and Canary Wharf stations. With a supermarket less than one minute’s walk away and a shopping centre located in the nearby Canary Wharf, the area contains all the amenities you will need during your stay. Our high quality serviced apartments at Marlin Limehouse range from studio apartments to spacious two bedroom apartments, each with thoughtful furnishings throughout to maximise the comfort of your stay. y r Studio Apartment Two Bedroom Apartment a v s e p y t t KITCHEN n LIVING e KITCHEN AREA m t r a p a l a u t c a BEDROOM , LIVING AREA y l n Average internal area o BEDROOM 460 sq ft / 43 sq m s e s o p r One Bedroom Apartment u p Average internal area e 750 sq ft / 70 sq m v i BEDROOM t a r t s u l l LIVING i AREA r o f I stayed for three weeks in Marlin e r a Limehouse, and enjoyed every minute of s n KITCHEN a the experience.
    [Show full text]
  • 13-20 Settles Street
    13-20 SETTLES STREET WHITECHAPEL, LONDON E1 Freehold refurbishment opportunity 1 13–20 SETTLES STREET PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE A RARE FREEHOLD PROPERTY IN AN AREA EXPERIENCING EXTRAORDINARY GROWTH. TO THE WEST ALDGATE IS BEING TRANSFORMED, TO THE NORTH THE TECH SECTOR EXPANDS FROM SHOREDITCH, AND TO THE EAST WHITECHAPEL WILL RECEIVE CROSSRAIL – JUST TWO MINUTES JOURNEY TIME FROM BOTH CANARY WHARF AND LIVERPOOL STREET. 2 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Freehold • A distinctive 1930s neo-Georgian property within the Whitechapel vision area • Excellent transport connectivity being approximately 500m from Whitechapel and Aldgate East Underground stations • The existing building comprises a net internal area of 17,107 sq ft (1,589 sq m) of office and ancillary accommodation arranged over lower ground, ground and one upper floor • Single let on an FRI lease to Trillium for Department of Work and Pensions at a rent of £150,000 per annum, expiring 1st April 2018 • The building has planning consent for a comprehensive refurbishment and addition of 3 further floors, with a proposed net internal area of 22,682 sq ft (2,107 sq m), and a change of planning use from A2 to B1 (offices) • Offers are invited in excess of £7,000,000, subject to contract and exclusive of VAT • A purchase at the level reflects a low capital value of £409 per sq ft on the existing accommodation and £308 per sq ft on the consented scheme 1 2 THE SHARD THE CITY OF LONDON TOWER OF LONDON ALDGATE ST KATHARINE DOCKS STATION BRICK LANE GOODMAN’S FIELDS SPITALFIELDS MARKET TOWER HILL STATION ALDGATE EAST STATION WHITECHAPEL STATION ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL 3 4 LOCAL AREA Aldgate and Whitechapel are evolving to become an integral part of London’s Tech Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Road London E1
    … 35A COMMERCIAL ROAD LONDON E1 PRIME LONDON DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY … … ALDGATE PLACE (BARRATT) GOODMAN’S ALDGATE ALDGATE FIELDS TOWER EAST WHITECHAPEL STATION 35A (BERKLEY HOMES) (BARRATT) STATION (CROSSRAIL) 500M ALTITUDE ALDGATE THE HERON LIVERPOOL STREET THE SHARD (BARRATT) STATION GHERKIN TOWER STATION … EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Prime city fringe location widely considered one of London’s growth ‘Hotspots’ • Existing building comprises 36 flats (5 x studios & 31 x one beds) totalling approximately 1,236.78 sq m (13,313 sq ft) GIA • Planning consent for change of use of part ground floor to retail (A1); alterations to existing 36 flats and creation of an additional 8 self-contained flats by 4 additional floors comprising a GIA of 4,443.5 sq m (47,830 sq ft). • Pre-application for a full re-development to provide 74 residential units and 250 sq m (2,691 sq ft) of commercial space • Alternative redevelopment potential for a number of uses to include residential, commercial or a mixed-use development subject to the necessary consents • Within the Central Activities Zone and the Aldgate Masterplan • Located within the London Borough of Tower Hamlets benefitting from Aldgate East Underground station and Whitechapel Crossrail station (Opening December 2018) • Vacant possession available on completion Outline for identification purposes only. … 35 A LOCATION CONNECTIVITY DESCRIPTION PLANNING REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL LOCAL DEVELOPMENTS LOCATION The property is located on the northern side of Commercial Road, immediately to the west of its junction with Adler Street with direct frontage to both streets. Aldgate is a popular residential area of East London located a short distance from the City and Shoreditch.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Grant Release from the Whitechapel High Street Fund To
    Commissioner Decision Report 24 May 2016 Report of: Classification: Aman Dalvi Unrestricted Corporate Director, Development and Renewal Report Title: Whitechapel High Street Fund as grant to London Small Business Centre to deliver capital refurbishment and accessible workspace at 206 Whitechapel Road (SITE 2) Originating Officer(s) Duncan Brown, Strategic Project Manager, Whitechapel Delivery Team Wards affected Whitechapel, Stepney Green, Spitalfields-and-Banglatown, Bethnal Green Key Decision? Yes Community Plan Theme A great place to live; A fair and prosperous community; A safe and cohesive community EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In July 2015, the Council entered into a jointly sponsored funding agreement known as the Whitechapel High Street Fund (WHSF) with the Greater London Authority (GLA) valued at £1.123 million to be spent in the geographical boundary of the Whitechapel Vision Masterplan SPD area by April 2017. The agreement consists of £520,000 awarded by the GLA matched by a £603,000 contribution from the Council (LBTH). Of this funding, £725,000 is allocated as capital funding for the refurbishment and reuse of vacant and underused spaces in order to contribute towards the delivery of workspace within the Whitechapel area. Of the £725,000 amount, the Council has until 30th September 2016 to allocate approximately £400,000 of unspent GLA match funding towards capital projects, or it must return these monies back to the GLA. Therefore timescales are critical to project spend being delivered within this timeframe. Following a six month pre-qualified site selection process (Call for Spaces) that commenced in September 2015 and bid selection process (Call for Bids) thereafter, this report recommends funding be released against SITE 2 (Royal Mail Group owned vacant unit at 206 Whitechapel Road) from the Whitechapel High Street Fund as grant directly towards the London Small Business Centre, to procure and deliver refurbishment works to enable new accessible workspace provision.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitechapel Station Environmental Statement
    Whitechapel Station Environmental Statement Non-technical Summary Contents Background to Crossrail 1 About this Document 1 Crossrail at Whitechapel 2 Existing Situation 2 The Scheme 3 Other Works at Whitechapel 7 Constructing Crossrail 8 Alternatives 9 Assessment of Environmental Impacts 10 Townscape and Built Heritage 10 Visual Amenity 10 Archaeology 11 Ecology 11 Water Resources 11 Traffic and Transport 12 Noise and Vibration 13 Air Quality 13 Contaminated Land 14 Community 14 Socio-economics 14 Cumulative Impacts 15 What Happens Next? 16 Conceptual visualisation of new Whitechapel Station Background to Crossrail About this Document Crossrail is a major railway development, connecting Maidenhead A new design has been developed for Whitechapel Station since the through central London to Shenfield and Abbey Wood. The railway publication of the Crossrail ES (2005). An Environmental Impact will also connect Heathrow Airport, the West End, central London, Assessment (EIA) has been completed for these design changes and including Whitechapel Station and Canary Wharf. an ES has been produced. In order to gain approval to build and operate the new railway, EIA is a process used at an early stage in planning and design to The Crossrail Bill was submitted to Parliament together with predict the environmental impacts of a development. It can be used to an Environmental Statement (ES) in 2005 that assessed the find ways to reduce any adverse impacts, shape projects to fit into the environmental impacts of works required for the Crossrail project. The local environment and maximise environmental benefits which could Crossrail Bill received Royal Assent and became The Crossrail Act in be created.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road Traffic (Special Parking Area) (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) Order 1994
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1994 No. 1613 ROAD TRAFFIC The Road Traffic (Special Parking Area) (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) Order 1994 Made - - - - 20th June 1994 Laid before Parliament 20th June 1994 Coming into force - - 4th July 1994 Whereas the council of the London borough of Tower Hamlets has applied to the Secretary of State for an order to be made under section 76 of the Road Traffic Act 1991(1) and the Secretary of State has consulted the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis in accordance with section 76(2) of that Act: NOW, the Secretary of State for Transport, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 76(1) and section 77(6) of the Road Traffic Act 1991 and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order:— Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Road Traffic (Special Parking Area) (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) Order 1994 and shall come into force on 4th July 1994. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “the 1984 Act” means the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984(2); “the 1991 Act” means the Road Traffic Act 1991; a reference in the Schedule to a number followed by the letter “m” is a reference to that number of metres; and where a road referred to in the Schedule to this Order (“the main road”) is joined by another road (“the side road”), whether or not that other road is referred to in the Schedule, and the footway to the main road runs on either side of the mouth of the side road, the junction between (1) 1991 c.
    [Show full text]
  • 87443A97-00Ae-46B5-B643-56B6cf5751c7-27.Pdf
    OUR STORY STARTS HERE 4 — 11 LOCATION 12 — 25 ARCHITECTURE 26 — 35 AMENITIES 36 — 49 INTERIORS 50 — 67 MATERIALS & SPECIFICATION 68 — 75 SITE OVERVIEW 76 — 77 BARRATT LONDON 78 — 79 OUR STORY STARTS HERE 5 | 6 OUR STORY STARTS HERE. IN AROUND AD 43, ON THE RIVERSIDE BETWEEN BLACKFRIARS AND TOWER HILL, THE ROMANS ESTABLISHED LONDINIUM. TWO THOUSAND YEARS LATER, LONDON’S ROMAN ORIGINS LIE DEEP BENEATH ITS STREETS, BUT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THAT FIRST SETTLEMENT, ON THE BANKS OF THE THAMES, LIES LANDMARK PLACE, LONDON’S ORIGINAL ADDRESS. COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY LANDMARK PLACE IS A BUILDING OF SUBSTANCE: ELEGANT, REFINED, AND ENTIRELY SUITED TO ITS ICONIC POSITION. A LANDMARK IN DESIGN, IN LOCATION, AND IN LONDON’S CONTINUING STORY. COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY OUR STORY STARTS HERE THE CITY’S RIVERSIDE For millennia, ships have sailed for London’s north shore, bringing goods from the furthest corners of the known world. Around this quay, the modern City has grown and flourished, a global capital, its landmarks clustered about its ancient core. 11 | 12 COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY LOCATION FIRST LIGHT. THE DAY BEFORE YOU, HISTORY JUST BENEATH YOUR FEET. 15 | 16 THE FIRST CITY OF LONDON Two thousand years ago, at a strategic Thames crossing, Britannia’s most important city was founded. Within seven years of the Roman invasion of AD 43, Londinium was established around a strategic crossing point with deep water access to the Thames’ north bank, now the heart of the modern City. The new settlement swiftly became a major trading post, the centre of the road network of the new Roman province of Britannia.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Sir Frederick Treves (1853-1923) Joseph Carey Merrick
    in 1923. in even through ill health until her death in 1919. in death her until health ill through even reminiscences of Joseph published shortly before his death death his before shortly published Joseph of reminiscences with improved accommodation. She remained as Matron Matron as remained She accommodation. improved with science. in 1908 and wrote popular travel literature as well as his his as well as literature travel popular wrote and 1908 in in 1895, and ensured that the nursing staff were provided provided were staff nursing the that ensured and 1895, in medical of benefit the for Act Anatomy the of terms the operated on Edward VII before his coronation. He retired retired He coronation. his before VII Edward on operated Nursing Institution in 1885, the Preliminary Training School School Training Preliminary the 1885, in Institution Nursing under College Medical the by preserved was skeleton His in the Boer War with his own surgical unit and famously famously and unit surgical own his with War Boer the in the examination. Eva Lückes established the Private Private the established Lückes Eva examination. the 1890. in death his until there resident a remained and www.qmul.ac.uk/publicengagement pioneered the operation to remove the appendix. He served served He appendix. the remove to operation the pioneered to complete two years of training with another year following following year another with training of years two complete to hospital the by in taken was He savings. his of robbed by the Centre for Public Engagement. Engagement. Public for Centre the by published many important works on surgery and anatomy anatomy and surgery on works important many published nursing at the hospital.
    [Show full text]