Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environmental

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environmental Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit Merseyside LTP Support Unit 24 Hatton Garden Liverpool Merseyside L3 2AN Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Sustainability Appraisal Report April 2007 Mott MacDonald 2nd Floor Marshall Court Marshall Street Leeds West Yorkshire LS11 9YP +44(0)113 394 6700 +44(0)113 394 6701 232614 Merseyside SPD SA/SEA SA Report Page 1 of 137 Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Sustainability Appraisal Report Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 05.04.07 N Levy K Leather E Thomas First Draft for Comment B 20.04.07 N Levy K Leather E Thomas Final Draft for Comment C 03.05.07 N Levy K Leather E Thomas Final Report for Issue This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report. 232614 Merseyside SPD SA/SEA SA Report Page 2 of 137 Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit List of Contents Page Chapters and Appendices 1 Components that make up the Environmental Report 9 2 Non-Technical Summary 10 3 Introduction 16 3.1 Terms of Reference 16 3.2 Purpose of the SA Report 16 3.3 Likely Significant Effects of the Plan 16 3.4 Difference the Process has Made 17 4 SA/SEA Legislative Requirements and Approach 18 4.1 Sustainability Appraisal Legislative Requirements 18 4.2 Strategic Environmental Assessment Legislative Requirements 18 4.3 SA/SEA Project Team 18 4.4 Merseyside SPD for Transport SA/SEA Timetable 20 4.5 SA/SEA and Habitats Regulations Assessment Approach 21 4.6 Scoping Report Consultation Results 22 5 Merseyside SPD for Transport 33 5.1 Context and Background 33 5.2 Contents of SPD 34 5.3 SPD Objectives 34 6 Sustainability Objectives, Baseline and Context 35 6.1 Relationship with other Plans and Programmes 35 6.1.1 National Context 36 6.1.2 Regional Context 37 6.1.3 Local Context 38 6.1.4 Policy Implications for the Merseyside SPD 40 6.2 Baseline Conditions 40 6.2.1 Environmental 41 6.2.2 Socio-Economic 48 6.3 Sustainability Issues 53 6.3.1 Landscape Implications 53 6.3.2 Cultural Heritage Implications 53 6.3.3 Air Quality and Climate Change Implications 54 6.3.4 Noise Implications 54 6.3.5 Water Quality Implications 54 6.3.6 Ecology Implications 54 6.3.7 Socio-Economic Implications 55 6.3.8 Health Implications 55 232614 Merseyside SPD SA/SEA SA Report Page 3 of 137 Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit 6.3.9 Housing Implications 55 6.3.10 Community and Quality of Life Implications 55 6.3.11 Sustainable Transport Implications 55 6.4 SA Framework 56 6.4.1 Developing SA/SEA Objectives 56 6.4.2 Developing SA/SEA Indicators 57 6.4.3 Compatibility of the SPD and SA/SEA Objectives 59 7 Appraisal of Strategic Options 61 7.1 Proposed Alternatives for the SPD 61 7.1.1 Option One – Business as Usual/Without SPD Option 61 7.1.2 Option Two – With SPD and without Air Quality Option 62 7.1.3 Option Three – With SPD and with added Air Quality Chapter Option 64 7.2 Appraisal of SPD Options 66 7.3 Trans-boundary and Cumulative Impacts 72 7.4 Summary of Appraisal Results 75 7.5 Mitigation Measures and Recommendations 75 8 Consulting on the Draft SPD and SA Report 77 9 Habitats Regulations Assessment 79 9.1 Habitats Regulations Assessment Requirements and Approach 79 9.2 Objective of the Habitats Regulations Assessment 79 9.3 Natura 2000 and Ramsar Sites 79 9.4 Habitats Regulations Assessment Consultation 80 9.5 Test of Likely Significance 80 9.6 Habitats Regulations Assessment Conclusions 85 10 Implementation and Monitoring 87 10.1 Links to Other Tiers of Plans, Programmes and the Project Level 87 10.2 Proposals for Monitoring 87 11 References 88 Appendix A Review of Relevant Plans and Programmes 89 Appendix B Alignment Matrix – Development of SA/SEA Objectives 108 Appendix C Baseline Trend Data and Monitoring Table 121 232614 Merseyside SPD SA/SEA SA Report Page 4 of 137 Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit Glossary of Terms Appropriate Assessment (Habitats Regulations Assessment): An assessment required under the Habitats Directive where a plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site may give rise to significant effects upon a European or Internationally designated site of nature conservation importance. Baseline: A description of the present and future state of an area, in the absence of any plan, taking into account changes resulting from natural events and from other human activities. Consultation Body: An authority which because of its environmental responsibilities is likely to be concerned by the effects of implementing plans and programmes and must be consulted under the SEA Directive. The Consultation Bodies, designated in the SEA Regulations are the Countryside Agency and English Nature (now Natural England), English Heritage and the Environment Agency. Development Plan Document (DPD): A type of Local Development Document with statutory status. DPDs include the core strategy, development control policies and site-specific allocations. Environmental Report (ER): An Environmental Report is a key output of SEA, presenting information on the effects of the draft plan on which formal public consultation is carried out. Local Development Document (LDD): There are two types of Local Development Document: Development Plan Documents and Supplementary Planning Documents. Local Development Framework (LDF): Sets out, in the form of a ‘portfolio’, the Local Development Documents which collectively deliver the spatial planning strategy for the area in question. The LDF also includes the Statement of Community Involvement, the Local Development Scheme and the Annual Monitoring Report. Indicator: A measure of variables over time, often used to measure achievement of objectives. Natura 2000: In May 1992 European Union governments adopted legislation designed to protect the most seriously threatened habitats and species across Europe. This legislation is called the Habitats Directive and complements the Birds Directive adopted in 1979. At the heart of both these Directives is the creation of a network of sites called Natura 2000. The Birds Directive requires the establishment of Special Protection Areas (SPAs) for birds. The Habitats Directive similarly requires Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) to be designated for other species, and for habitats. Together, SPAs and SACs make up the Natura 2000 series. Objective: A statement of what is intended, specifying the desired direction of change in trends. Scoping: The process of deciding the scope and level of detail of an SA, including the sustainability effects and options which need to be considered, the assessment methods to be used, and the structure and contents of the SA Report. SEA Directive: European Directive 2001/42/EC ‘on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment’. Transposed into UK law via The Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004. 232614 Merseyside SPD SA/SEA SA Report Page 5 of 137 Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit Strategic Environmental Assessment: Generic term used internationally to describe environmental assessment as applied to policies, plans and programmes. In this report, ‘SEA’ is used to refer to the type of environmental assessment required under the SEA Directive. Sustainability Appraisal: Generic term used to describe the form of assessment that considers social, environmental and economic effects, which fully incorporates the requirements of the SEA Directive. Sustainability Appraisal Report: Term used to describe a document required to be produced as part of the SA process to describe and appraise the likely significant effects on sustainability of implementing a plan, which also meets the requirement for the Environmental Report under the SEA Directive. Supplementary Planning Document: A Supplementary Planning Document is a Local Development Document that may cover a range of issues, thematic or site specific, and provides further detail of policies and proposals in a 'parent' Development Plan Document 232614 Merseyside SPD SA/SEA SA Report Page 6 of 137 Merseyside Supplementary Planning Document for Transport 'Ensuring Choice of Travel' Mott MacDonald Sustainability Appraisal Report Merseyside LTP Support Unit Abbreviations Acronyms and other abbreviations used in this report are listed below.
Recommended publications
  • MAIB Report No 32/2014
    ACCIDENT REPORT ACCIDENT sinking oftheDUKW andabandonment amphibiouspassenger VERY SERIOUS MARINE CASUALTY REPORT NO CASUALTY SERIOUS MARINE VERY fire and abandonment of the DUKW amphibious passenger oftheDUKW andabandonment fire amphibiouspassenger Combined report on the investigations ofthe reportCombined ontheinvestigations on the River Thames, London Thames, on theRiver in Salthouse Dock, Liverpool H Wacker Quacker 1 Quacker Wacker on 29 September 2013 on 29September NC on 15June2013 A Cleopatra R and the vehicle vehicle N B IO T A G TI S 32 /2014 DECEMBER 2014 INVE T DEN I C C A NE RI A M Extract from The United Kingdom Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012 – Regulation 5: “The sole objective of the investigation of an accident under the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012 shall be the prevention of future accidents through the ascertainment of its causes and circumstances. It shall not be the purpose of an investigation to determine liability nor, except so far as is necessary to achieve its objective, to apportion blame.” NOTE This report is not written with litigation in mind and, pursuant to Regulation 14(14) of the Merchant Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations 2012, shall be inadmissible in any judicial proceedings whose purpose, or one of whose purposes is to attribute or apportion liability or blame. © Crown copyright, 2014 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Liverpool South Docks
    Welcome to Liverpool South Docks We’re the charity who look after 2,000 miles of canals and rivers across England and Wales, including Liverpool South Docks, which was awarded Blue Flag in 2021. 200 years ago, this was one of the world’s major trading centres. Today, it’s Mann Island a World Heritage Site, offering a peaceful escapeLock in the heart of the city. Visitor berths S t ra n d Canning Graving Docks S Canning Dock t re e Mann t Island Canning Graving Docks Lock City Centre Visitor berths Canning Canning Half Canning Dock Tide Dock A Graving 5 Floating Visitor 6 Docks 2 Canning Half ActivityCanning berths Tide Dock StageRiver Canning River Entrance (access to Entrance (access River to River Mersey) Salthouse Mersey) Dock Visitor Royal Long moorings Albert term Dock berths Salthouse Dock Visitor St berths er Long ow G s Dock term uke berths D Royal Albert Dock Albert Dock eet r Str Security Gowe towpath Wapping office Dock footbridge point of interest K i n marina g et s A re River Mersey St 5 r Canal & River Trust office P e a 6 w o r 2 G a d e boardwalksboardwalks / pontoons / pontoons railings /railings edge protection / edge protection grab chaingrab chain footbridgefootbridge gate / barriergate / barrier ramp to ramppontoons to pontoons Queen’s River Mersey Dock escape ladderescape ladder Canal & CanalRiver Trust& River office Trust office rf Wha life ring life ring sanitary sanitaryfacilities facilities ftide Hal danger deepdanger water deep sign water sign rubbish rubbishbins bins other signother sign parking parking miscellaneousmiscellaneous issue issue bus stationbus station Liverpool Whar S Watersports ers f e Take a stroll around the docks rin f a t Centre M o n and the wider waterfront, admiring S C Coburg Dock t the architecture and the views o b u across the Mersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Statement Mixed Use Development
    PLANNING STATEMENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT BRUNSWICK QUAY, LIVERPOOL ON BEHALF OF MARO DEVELOPMENTS LTD JULY 2018 Roman Summer Associates Ltd Haweswater House Waterfold Business Park Bury Lancashire BL9 7BR Web www.romansummer.com Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Description of the Site, Surroundings, Proposal & Planning History 4 3. Overview of Planning Policy 12 4. Planning Assessment 25 5. Conclusions 45 Appendices Appendix 1 – Pre-Application Comments from Historic England Appendix 2 – Pre-Application Comments from the LPA Appendix 3 – LPA’s EIA Screening Opinion Appendix 4 – Summary comments from Inspector and Secretary of State for 2006 Appeals BRUNSWICK QUAY, LIVERPOOL PLANNING STATEMENT JULY 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Planning Statement supports a full planning application submitted by Maro Developments Ltd that seeks permission for the erection of four interlinked blocks on the Brunswick Quay site, comprising a total of 552 mixed apartments and 669 sqm (gross) ground floor commercial falling within any combination of Class A1, A2, A3, A4 and/or D2, 307 car parking spaces, 552 cycle parking spaces, private communal piazzas / terraces and associated landscaping / boundary treatment and public realm works, all accessed via Atlantic Way. Brunswick Quay in context : ROMAN SUMMER Associates Ltd Page | 1 BRUNSWICK QUAY, LIVERPOOL PLANNING STATEMENT JULY 2018 1.2 As the photograph above demonstrates, Brunswick Quay is a vacant brownfield site that has sat empty and largely unused for many years. 1.3 The site is the subject of a chequered planning history (outlined in Section 2.0), including a proposal in 2006 for a 51 storey tower and two buildings of 10 storeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Historic Settlement Study
    Liverpool Historic Settlement Study Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project December 2011 Merseyside Historic Characterisation Project Museum of Liverpool Pier Head Liverpool L3 1DG © Trustees of National Museums Liverpool and English Heritage 2011 Contents Introduction to Historic Settlement Study..................................................................1 Aigburth....................................................................................................................4 Allerton.....................................................................................................................7 Anfield.................................................................................................................... 10 Broadgreen ............................................................................................................ 12 Childwall................................................................................................................. 14 Clubmoor ............................................................................................................... 16 Croxteth Park ......................................................................................................... 18 Dovecot.................................................................................................................. 20 Everton................................................................................................................... 22 Fairfield .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Dock Extensions at Liverpool with a General
    2 ELECTIOXS, ETC. [Minutes of Associate ilIembem-continued. JAXESDICEERSOW HUYPIDGE. l FI:A.NI~WALTER SCOTT, Jun., Stud. Inst. JAMESROUTLEDGE JACQUES. l C.E. CHARLESVEREKER LLOYD, A.K.C., ~ ALBIOXTIIOMAS SXELL. l Stud. Inst. C.E. TV.4LTER JOHNSTAYFORD, B.A., B.E. WALTEREDWAED MAY, Stud. Inst. C.E. i JOHXHODGSOX SUAI~T. CHARLESMURRAY, Stud. Inst. C.E. ALLANARCHIBALD CAMPBELL SWINTOX. HARRYPEKX, Stud. Inst. C.E. WILLIAXHEXRY THORPE. LESLIEHUNTER REYNOLDS. ARTHCR WILLIADISOS, Stud. InSt. C.E. LIOWELSALTXARSHE. GEORGEWYLIE, F.C.H. , Associate. Ncbjor LEAXDROCUBILLO. (Paper No. 2433.) Recent Dock Extensions at Liverpool, with a General Description of the MerseyDock Estate,the Port of Liverpool,and the RiverMersey.” By GEORGEFOSBERY LYSTER, M. Inst. C.E. THEspecial characteristics of theRiver Mersey, theimportant positionwhich Liverpool occupies among theleading trading centres of the world, and the rapid development of its commerce are, each and all, so interesting to engineers, that in submitting a Paper descriptive of the most recent dock extensions carried out in the port, the Author has been induced to touch upon each of these points, as a fitting preamble to the more formal and precise description of the special works which form the leading features of the Paper. Few, if any, localities, inthis country at all events, are so favourably situatedfor the construction of a comprehensive system of docks as that of Liverpool, not onlyby reason of its geographical position on the seaboard of the country, with its unrivalled water frontage, but also on account of its proximity to the great manu- faeturing districts, as well as to the coal and mineral fields of the North of England and Wales, with which it is linked by railways and canals, which aresuch important factors in thedevelopment and maintenance of successful trading.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Supporting Habitat Liverpool Docks Aug 2015
    Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Report Ref: 4157.005 August 2015 Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Document Reference: 4157.005 Version 3.0 August 2015 Prepared by: TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Fax: 01925 844002 e-mail: [email protected] for: Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service First floor Merton House Stanley Road Bootle Merseyside L20 3DL Written: Checked: Approved: MW TR TR CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SURVEY METHODS .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SUMMARY SURVEY FINDINGS ............................................................................ 17 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 82 6.0 DISCUSSION OF IMPLICATIONS RELATING TO NATURA 2000 SITES.............. 83 7.0 REFERENCES & FURTHER READING ................................................................. 86 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Examples of Survey Sheets Appendix 2: Vantage Point Survey Coverage Appendix 3: Tabulated Raw Data Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool. • [ Kelly"S
    150 DOC LIVERPOOL. • [ KELLY"S DOCK ROAD-contil!ued. BRUNSWICK DOCK, entrance Liverpool ShipVITeck & Humane Manchester Ship Canal Co. Carr & Asbcroft, coal mers from Sefton street. MAP Q 8. Society (Robert P. J. Simpson (Bridgewater undertaking), Darlington John, ~hip broker Station here on the Overhead R.N. sec. & treasurer) W. H. Collier, manager Owen Jsph.&Sons,timber mers railway. Wright Richard M. head gateman Anderton Co. (Manchester Ship Hutchinson John &Peter, ship Dock master, William C. Jarvis Clay William, dock gateman Canal Co.), carriers by water owners Dock Traffic Manager's Office Jackson William & Sons, carriers Banks & Ratcliffe, timber mers (District F), NORTH & SOUTH CARRIERS' by water (Fredk. Bolt, agent) Hughes R:chd. & Co. shipbkrs Rt. Sutherland, traffic manager DOCK, entrance from Regent Fellows, Morton & Clayton (Man- • POST Office & Telegraph &c. William H. Jahnke, surveyor road. MAP C 11, C 12. Nearest chester Ship CanalCo.), carrienr James Phillips, postmaster of cargoes station on the Overhead railway by water Dock Master's Office, Evans R. & J. & Co. ship builders is Canada dock. Gandy John W. (~anchester Ship Wm.J.G.Tongue,dockmstr (Brunswick graving dock) Dock master, John T. Gould C~nal Co.), carne~ by .water Jas.Carter,assist.dockmstr JonesJn.&Sonsironshipbuil1ers BarnesJohn } . te Pacific Steam NaVIgatwn Co.'s L. & N. W. R. Co.'s 011ice, BRUNSWICK' BUILDINGS • Connor Robert pier mas rs Wharf John Poole, labeur master 1 J . wm· 0 · Gray Jonathan, timber merchant Great WesternRailwayCo.'sGoods TaylorChs.Sons~Co.tmbr.mers 2 :rJ'~nchi~a~. pier master Depot (Wm. Philip, goods agt ••• , •. h!rre is Garl,on dock......
    [Show full text]
  • Whs-Spd-Lowres
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document Adopted October 2009 Foreword Foreword by Peter Millea, Executive Member for Regeneration and John Kelly, Executive Director Regeneration This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) for the World Heritage Site (WHS) is issued following extensive public consultation by Liverpool City Council. The City Council and partners have noted the representations made by many that the WHS should contribute to the regeneration, visitor economy and local sense of civic pride in Liverpool, over coming months and years. The City Council will therefore commit more resources to promotion and interpretation of the WHS to ensure that its unique cultural heritage is fully utilised, as well as being properly conserved. The purpose of the SPD is to provide a planning framework for development which will enhance the city’s heritage and boost investment, tourism and regeneration. Above all, it is intended as a policy document which will encourage economic regeneration with an emphasis on quality. It is part of an emerging statutory development framework for the city which will outline more specific guidance on land allocations to prioritise target areas for economic growth for the whole city, including the World Heritage Site and areas bordering on it. The SPD includes important principles about World Heritage Site management in the longer term, with the emphasis on preserving and enhancing Liverpool’s outstanding universal value and the quality of its public realm. However, it is being issued at a time when the global and UK economy is contracting and a main priority for the City Council is the city’s continuing economic regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Eight: Liverpool City Council Sustainability Appraisal of District
    Appendix Eight: Liverpool City Council Sustainability Appraisal of District Council Action Plan Sustainability Appraisal of the District Council Action Plan for Liverpool Sustainability Appraisal of the District Council Action Plan for Liverpool July 2007 1 Sustainability Appraisal of the District Council Action Plan for Liverpool Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 3 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 6 1.1 District Council Action Plans .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Aim of the Sustainability Appraisal........................................................................................ 7 1.3 Focus of the Sustainability Appraisal .................................................................................... 7 2. METHODOLOGY................................................................................................ 7 3. SCOPING PHASE .............................................................................................. 8 3.1 Literature review....................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Baseline data and information ................................................................................................ 8 3.3 Initial Scoping Scores...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Waterspace Strategy Sustainable Development Liverpool South
    Prepared by: a Waterspace Strategy for the Sustainable Development of the Liverpool South Docks The Liverpool Waterspace Strategy establishes three character zones a within the south docks: the Culture Zone, encompassing Canning Dock, Canning Half-tide, Albert Dock and Salthouse Dock; the Mixed- Waterspace Strategy use Zone, encompassing Wapping Dock, the former King’s Dock and for the extending into Queen’s Dock and the Leisure and Aquatecture Zone, encompassing Queen’s Dock, Coburg Dock and Brunswick Dock. Sustainable Development Duke’s Dock sits on the overlap between the Culture Zone and the of the Mixed-use Zone. The Liverpool Waterspace Strategy also identifies a range of activity/ Liverpool South Docks uses within the waterspaces of each of the docks, and guidance on the issues and objectives for each dock. There are examples of how these uses may take shape with three optional indicative plans for each dock. British Waterways identified that the Liverpool south docks, part of Some of the optional proposals for the docks include: the UNESCO World Heritage Site, are under-used, and that there is – ‘Albert Dock Spectacular’, providing space for boat no clear over-arching framework for introducing activity to the docks. festivals, cultural celebrations or a floating sculpture park. Baca were appointed by British Waterways, to develop a long-term vision for activating the waterspace of the Liverpool South Docks. – ‘Salthouse Dock Shop Window’, providing a gateway into the south docks and waterfront activity along The The Liverpool Waterspace Strategy (LWS) is a guide to inform Strand. Concepts include a floating event space and a new considered development of the waterspace within the south docks, ‘Docker’s Umbrella’ as a place to gather.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years of the LNRS
    First published in November 1998 by The Liverpool Nautical Research Society, Maritime Archives & Library, Merseyside Maritime Museum, Albert Dock, Liverpool L3 4AA U.K. © 1998 The Liverpool Nautical Research Society British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-9513633-2-8 Printed by Impressions, The Old Bank, 16 Palm Hill, Oxton Village, Birkenhead, Wirral L43 5SP The front cover illustration is a typical Mersey scene in the late 1950s, with the Cunard liner Carinthia (21,947 tons, built 1956) and Alexandra Towing Company's tender Flying Breeze (387 tons, built 1913 ). (from the Raymond Brandreth collection) CONTENTS Page STRUGGLE AND SURVIVAL The Story of Thos. & Jas.Harrison Ltd. since 1938 (Graeme Cubbin). 1 THE PORT OF LIVERPOOL AND THE SINGLE EUROPEAN MARKET A Re-Assessment of the impact of Britain's Membership of the European Union upon the fortunes of the Port of Liverpool (John Moore). 17 LIVERPOOL UNDERWRITERS' SHIP-REGISTER BOOKS 1815 I 1835, 1842 I 1845, 1862 I 1885 ( David Eccles) . ........... 23 EARLY STEAMSHIP VOYAGES BETWEEN LIVERPOOL AND THE MEDITERRANEAN (John Cook) ............................................ 30 THOMAS UTLEY (1854- 1927) AND HIS SUCCESSORS (Ken Tinkler) ........................................... 42 ROGERS AND BRIGHT The story of Liverpool coastal Shipowners, 1886 - 1917 ( Roy Fenton) . ........................................... 47 WHAT'S IN A NAME ...... ? THE "BEN-MY-CHREE" ( Ron Evans) ............................................ 60 1938 ..•.. A Summary of the Year 1938 in Liverpool Shipping (A/an McClelland) . ...................................... 68 EARLY MERSEY PASSENGER STEAMERS UP TO c1840 (Terry Kavanagh) ........................................ 73 ii FOREWORD by L.N.R.S. Vice-President Ray Pugh As a Vice-President of the Liverpool Nautical Research Society, I should like to offer congratulations on the occasion of its Diamond Jubilee.
    [Show full text]
  • Height: Miles
    Delivery Details Birkenhead (CH44 2) Residential delivery count 32232 Business delivery count 1869 Marine Lake Brocklebank Dock Accommodation Type % CH45CH45 22 KirkdaleKirkdale L4L4 33 Detached 5.36% L20L20 8 8 NewNew BrightonBrighton BankBank HallHall Canada Dock BankBank HallHall Semi-detached 36.17% CH45CH45 9 9 L4L4 11 Terraced (including end-terrace) 33.99% CH45CH45 00 CH45CH45 1 1 KirkdaleKirkdale Purpose-Built Flats in a Residential Building 15.01% Huskisson Dock CH45CH45 L5L5 77 Converted Flat 2.21% CH45CH45 33 SandhillsSandhills CH45CH45 33 CH45CH45 5 5 SandhillsSandhills WallaseyWallasey Grove Grove Road Road Purpose-Built Flats in a Commercial Building 6.93% Sandon Half Tide Dock L5L5 99 CH45CH45 77 Wellington Dock CH45CH45 6 6 CH45CH45 77 L5L5 22 L5L5 Others 0.33% Bramley More Dock CH45CH45 88 CH45CH45 44 CH45CH45 44 L5L5 5 5 Total 100% Nelson Dock WallaseyWallasey L3L3 00 WallaseyWallasey L5L5 33 Salisbury Dock L5L5 33 CH44CH44 11 CH44CH44 00 L5L5 88 CH46CH46 2 2 CH44CH44 00 L5L5 88 CH46CH46 2 2 Tenure % CH44CH44 8 8 Trafalgar Dock CH44CH44 22 Owned: Owned outright 26.97% CH46CH46 3 3 CH44CH44 22 CH44CH44 3 3 L3L3 66 CH44CH44 L3L3 77 L3L3 33 Owned: Owned with a mortgage or loan 31.17% CH44CH44 5 5 West Waterloo Dock CH44CH44 99 CH44CH44 66 Owner occupied - Shared ownership 0.49% CH46CH46 1 1 Princes Half Tide Dock CH46CH46 1 1 L3L3 22 CH44CH44 44 Rented from - Council (local authority) 3.49% BidstonBidston L3L3 99 BidstonBidston L3L3 99 L2L2 2 2 LiverpoolLiverpool LeasoweLeasowe Princes Dock L2L2 2 2 LiverpoolLiverpool CH44CH44
    [Show full text]