<<

Banach spaces.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, and Andras Zsak

January 24, 2009

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Definition (Banach ) A normed (X , k · k) is called a if X is complete in the .

Definition (Schauder ) ∞ A (xi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a basis for X if for every x ∈ X there exists a ∞ P∞ unique sequence of scalars (ai )i=1 such that x = i=1 ai xi .

Question (Mazur ’36) Does every separable Banach space have a basis?

Theorem (Enflo ’72) No.

Background

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Definition () ∞ A sequence (xi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a basis for X if for every x ∈ X there exists a ∞ P∞ unique sequence of scalars (ai )i=1 such that x = i=1 ai xi .

Question (Mazur ’36) Does every separable Banach space have a basis?

Theorem (Enflo ’72) No.

Background

Definition (Banach space) A (X , k · k) is called a Banach space if X is complete in the norm topology.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Question (Mazur ’36) Does every separable Banach space have a basis?

Theorem (Enflo ’72) No.

Background

Definition (Banach space) A normed vector space (X , k · k) is called a Banach space if X is complete in the norm topology.

Definition (Schauder basis) ∞ A sequence (xi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a basis for X if for every x ∈ X there exists a ∞ P∞ unique sequence of scalars (ai )i=1 such that x = i=1 ai xi .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Enflo ’72) No.

Background

Definition (Banach space) A normed vector space (X , k · k) is called a Banach space if X is complete in the norm topology.

Definition (Schauder basis) ∞ A sequence (xi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a basis for X if for every x ∈ X there exists a ∞ P∞ unique sequence of scalars (ai )i=1 such that x = i=1 ai xi .

Question (Mazur ’36) Does every separable Banach space have a basis?

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. No.

Background

Definition (Banach space) A normed vector space (X , k · k) is called a Banach space if X is complete in the norm topology.

Definition (Schauder basis) ∞ A sequence (xi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a basis for X if for every x ∈ X there exists a ∞ P∞ unique sequence of scalars (ai )i=1 such that x = i=1 ai xi .

Question (Mazur ’36) Does every separable Banach space have a basis?

Theorem (Enflo ’72)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Background

Definition (Banach space) A normed vector space (X , k · k) is called a Banach space if X is complete in the norm topology.

Definition (Schauder basis) ∞ A sequence (xi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a basis for X if for every x ∈ X there exists a ∞ P∞ unique sequence of scalars (ai )i=1 such that x = i=1 ai xi .

Question (Mazur ’36) Does every separable Banach space have a basis?

Theorem (Enflo ’72) No.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Every separable Banach space is isometric to a subspace of C[0, 1].

Question Given a Banach space X with some desirable structure, does X embed into a Banach space Y with a basis having some related structure?

Theorem (Zippin ’88) A separable Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is boundedly complete and shrinking. A separable Banach space X has separable dual if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is shrinking.

Old embedding results

Theorem (Banach)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Question Given a Banach space X with some desirable structure, does X embed into a Banach space Y with a basis having some related structure?

Theorem (Zippin ’88) A separable Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is boundedly complete and shrinking. A separable Banach space X has separable dual if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is shrinking.

Old embedding results

Theorem (Banach) Every separable Banach space is isometric to a subspace of C[0, 1].

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Zippin ’88) A separable Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is boundedly complete and shrinking. A separable Banach space X has separable dual if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is shrinking.

Old embedding results

Theorem (Banach) Every separable Banach space is isometric to a subspace of C[0, 1].

Question Given a Banach space X with some desirable structure, does X embed into a Banach space Y with a basis having some related structure?

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. A separable Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is boundedly complete and shrinking. A separable Banach space X has separable dual if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is shrinking.

Old embedding results

Theorem (Banach) Every separable Banach space is isometric to a subspace of C[0, 1].

Question Given a Banach space X with some desirable structure, does X embed into a Banach space Y with a basis having some related structure?

Theorem (Zippin ’88)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. A separable Banach space X has separable dual if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is shrinking.

Old embedding results

Theorem (Banach) Every separable Banach space is isometric to a subspace of C[0, 1].

Question Given a Banach space X with some desirable structure, does X embed into a Banach space Y with a basis having some related structure?

Theorem (Zippin ’88) A separable Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is boundedly complete and shrinking.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Old embedding results

Theorem (Banach) Every separable Banach space is isometric to a subspace of C[0, 1].

Question Given a Banach space X with some desirable structure, does X embed into a Banach space Y with a basis having some related structure?

Theorem (Zippin ’88) A separable Banach space X is reflexive if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is boundedly complete and shrinking. A separable Banach space X has separable dual if and only if X embeds into a Banach space Y with a basis which is shrinking.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces.

Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Banach frames

Definition (Schauder frame) ∞ Let X be an infinite dimensional separable Banach space. A sequence (xi , fi )i=1 ∞ ∞ ∗ with (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X is called a frame of X if for every x ∈ X , P x = fi (x)xi . ∞ P The sequence (xi , fi )i=1 is called an unconditional frame of X if fi (x)xi converges unconditionally to x ∈ X .

Theorem (Casazza, Han, Larson ’99 and Casazza, Dilworth, Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) ∞ ∞ ∗ Let X be a separable Banach space and let (xi )i=1 ⊂ X and (fi )i=1 ⊂ X . ∞ (xi , fi )i=1 is a frame of X if and only if there is a Banach space Z with a basis ∞ ∗ ∞ (zi )i=1 having coordinate functionals (zi )i=1 and an isomorphic embedding

T : X → Z and a bounded linear surjection S : Z → X such that S ◦ T = IdX ∗ ∗ and S(zi ) = xi and T (zi ) = fi for all i ∈ N with xi 6= 0.

Essentially, frames are characterized as projections of bases onto complemented subspaces. Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Pelczynski ’71 Johnson, Rosenthal and Zippin ’71) A Banach space X has the bounded if and only if X is isomorphic to a of a Banach space with a basis.

Corollary A Banach space X has a frame if and only if X has the bounded approximation property.

Definition (Bounded approximation property) A Banach space X has the bounded approximation property if there exists a constant λ ≥ 1 such that for all  > 0 and compact K ⊂ X there exists a finite rank operator T : X → X with kT k ≤ λ and kT (x) − xk <  ∀x ∈ X .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Corollary A Banach space X has a frame if and only if X has the bounded approximation property.

Definition (Bounded approximation property) A Banach space X has the bounded approximation property if there exists a constant λ ≥ 1 such that for all  > 0 and compact K ⊂ X there exists a finite rank operator T : X → X with kT k ≤ λ and kT (x) − xk <  ∀x ∈ X .

Theorem (Pelczynski ’71 Johnson, Rosenthal and Zippin ’71) A Banach space X has the bounded approximation property if and only if X is isomorphic to a complemented subspace of a Banach space with a basis.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Definition (Bounded approximation property) A Banach space X has the bounded approximation property if there exists a constant λ ≥ 1 such that for all  > 0 and compact K ⊂ X there exists a finite rank operator T : X → X with kT k ≤ λ and kT (x) − xk <  ∀x ∈ X .

Theorem (Pelczynski ’71 Johnson, Rosenthal and Zippin ’71) A Banach space X has the bounded approximation property if and only if X is isomorphic to a complemented subspace of a Banach space with a basis.

Corollary A Banach space X has a frame if and only if X has the bounded approximation property.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. In 2002, Odell and Schlumprecht characterize when a separable reflexive

Banach space embeds into a Banach space of the form Y = (⊕En)`p where En is a finite dimensional space for all n ∈ N. In fact, Y can be chosen to be n Y = (⊕`∞)`p . In 2008, Johnson and Zheng characterized when a separable reflexive Banach space embeds into a Banach space with an unconditional basis.

Question (70’s) Does every Banach space with an unconditional frame have an unconditional basis?

Recent embedding results

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. In fact, Y can be chosen to be n Y = (⊕`∞)`p . In 2008, Johnson and Zheng characterized when a separable reflexive Banach space embeds into a Banach space with an unconditional basis.

Question (70’s) Does every Banach space with an unconditional frame have an unconditional basis?

Recent embedding results

In 2002, Odell and Schlumprecht characterize when a separable reflexive

Banach space embeds into a Banach space of the form Y = (⊕En)`p where En is a finite dimensional space for all n ∈ N.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. In 2008, Johnson and Zheng characterized when a separable reflexive Banach space embeds into a Banach space with an unconditional basis.

Question (70’s) Does every Banach space with an unconditional frame have an unconditional basis?

Recent embedding results

In 2002, Odell and Schlumprecht characterize when a separable reflexive

Banach space embeds into a Banach space of the form Y = (⊕En)`p where En is a finite dimensional space for all n ∈ N. In fact, Y can be chosen to be n Y = (⊕`∞)`p .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Question (70’s) Does every Banach space with an unconditional frame have an unconditional basis?

Recent embedding results

In 2002, Odell and Schlumprecht characterize when a separable reflexive

Banach space embeds into a Banach space of the form Y = (⊕En)`p where En is a finite dimensional space for all n ∈ N. In fact, Y can be chosen to be n Y = (⊕`∞)`p . In 2008, Johnson and Zheng characterized when a separable reflexive Banach space embeds into a Banach space with an unconditional basis.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Recent embedding results

In 2002, Odell and Schlumprecht characterize when a separable reflexive

Banach space embeds into a Banach space of the form Y = (⊕En)`p where En is a finite dimensional space for all n ∈ N. In fact, Y can be chosen to be n Y = (⊕`∞)`p . In 2008, Johnson and Zheng characterized when a separable reflexive Banach space embeds into a Banach space with an unconditional basis.

Question (70’s) Does every Banach space with an unconditional frame have an unconditional basis?

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ).

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Yes.

Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Question Does there exist a separable reflexive space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Szlenk ’68) Every separable Banach space X may be assigned an ordinal Sz(X ) such that 1. If X ⊂ Y then Sz(X ) ≤ Sz(Y ). 2. X has separable dual if and only if Sz(X ) is countable. 3. For every countable ordinal α there exists a Banach space X with separable dual such that Sz(X ) > α. In particular, there does not exist a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable reflexive Banach space embeds into Y .

Question (Bourgain ’80) Does there exist a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable uniformly convex Banach space embeds into Y ?

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht ’07) Yes. Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. For all countable ordinals α there exists a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space X with Sz(X ), Sz(X ∗) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y and Sz(Y ), Sz(Y ∗) ≤ ωαω+1.

Theorem (Dodos, Ferenczi ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F,Odell,Schlumprecht, Zsak ’08) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that Sz(Y ) ≤ ωαω+1 and every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a Banach space with separable dual, then X embeds into a Banach ∗ space Y such that Y is isomorphic to `1.

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Dodos, Ferenczi ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F,Odell,Schlumprecht, Zsak ’08) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that Sz(Y ) ≤ ωαω+1 and every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a Banach space with separable dual, then X embeds into a Banach ∗ space Y such that Y is isomorphic to `1.

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space X with Sz(X ), Sz(X ∗) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y and Sz(Y ), Sz(Y ∗) ≤ ωαω+1.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (F,Odell,Schlumprecht, Zsak ’08) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that Sz(Y ) ≤ ωαω+1 and every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a Banach space with separable dual, then X embeds into a Banach ∗ space Y such that Y is isomorphic to `1.

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space X with Sz(X ), Sz(X ∗) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y and Sz(Y ), Sz(Y ∗) ≤ ωαω+1.

Theorem (Dodos, Ferenczi ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (F, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a Banach space with separable dual, then X embeds into a Banach ∗ space Y such that Y is isomorphic to `1.

Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space X with Sz(X ), Sz(X ∗) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y and Sz(Y ), Sz(Y ∗) ≤ ωαω+1.

Theorem (Dodos, Ferenczi ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F,Odell,Schlumprecht, Zsak ’08) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that Sz(Y ) ≤ ωαω+1 and every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Odell, Schlumprecht, Zsak ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a separable reflexive Banach space Y such that every separable reflexive Banach space X with Sz(X ), Sz(X ∗) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y and Sz(Y ), Sz(Y ∗) ≤ ωαω+1.

Theorem (Dodos, Ferenczi ’07) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F,Odell,Schlumprecht, Zsak ’08) For all countable ordinals α there exists a Banach space Y with separable dual such that Sz(Y ) ≤ ωαω+1 and every separable Banach space X with Sz(X ) ≤ ωαω embeds into Y .

Theorem (F, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a Banach space with separable dual, then X embeds into a Banach ∗ space Y such that Y is isomorphic to `1.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a ?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09)

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces. Question (Lindenstraus) Does there exist a Banach space X with the property that every bounded

operator T : X → X is of the form T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator?

Theorem (Argyros, Haydon ’09) Yes.

Theorem (Lomonosov ’73) If an operator T on a Banach space commutes with a nonzero compact operator then T has an invariant subspace.

Theorem (F, Haydon, Odell, Schlumprecht ’09) If X is a uniformly convex separable Banach space, then X embeds into a Banach space Y such that every bounded operator T : X → X is of the form

T = λIdX + K, where λ ∈ R and K is a compact operator.

Daniel Freeman with Edward Odell, Thomas Schlumprecht, Richard Haydon, andEmbedding Andras Zsak Banach spaces.