Mcmahon–Hussein Correspondence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mcmahon–Hussein Correspondence McMahon–Hussein Correspondence The McMahon–Hussein Correspondence, or the Hussein–McMahon Correspondence, was a series of On his return journey from Istanbul in 1915, where Faisal ten letters exchanged from 14 July 1915 to 30 January [1] bin Hussein had confronted the Grand Vizier with evi- 1916, during World War I, between Hussein bin Ali, dence of an Ottoman plot to depose his father (Husayn Sharif of Mecca, and Sir Henry McMahon, British High bin Ali), he decided to visit Damascus to resume talks Commissioner in Egypt, concerning the political status with the Arab secret societies al-Fatat and Al-'Ahd that he Ottoman Empire. Growing Arab na- of lands under the had met in March/April. On this occasion, Faisal joined tionalism had led to a desire for independence from the their revolutionary movement. During this visit, on 23 Ottoman Empire. In the letters Britain agreed to recog- May 1915, he was presented with the document that be- nize Arab independence after World War I “in the limits came known as the 'Damascus Protocol'. The documents and boundaries proposed by the Sherif of Mecca”, not in- declared that the Arabs would revolt in alliance with the cluding areas in which France had interests. This was in United Kingdom, and in return the UK would recognize exchange for Arab help in fighting the Ottomans, led by the Arab independence in an area running from the 37th Hussein bin Ali. parallel near the Taurus Mountains on the southern bor- Later, the 1916 Sykes–Picot Agreement between France der of Turkey, to be bounded in the east by Persia and the and UK was exposed showing that the two countries were Persian Gulf, in the west by the Mediterranean Sea and planning to split and occupy parts of the promised Arab in the south by the Arabian Sea.[6][7] country. Early in April 1914 Abdullah I bin al-Hussein (the second In January 1923 unofficial excerpts were published by of three sons of Sherif Hussein bin Ali) asked the British Joseph N. M. Jeffries in the Daily Mail[2] and copies of High Commissioner in Cairo what would be the British the various letters circulated in the Arab press.[3] Offi- attitude if the Arab Ottomans revolted. The British re- cial excerpts were published in the 1937 Peel Commis- sponse based on its traditional policy of preserving “the sion Report,[4] but the correspondence was first published integrity of the Ottoman Empire” was negative. How- in full in George Antonius's 1938 The Arab Awakening. ever, the entry of the Ottomans on Germany’s side in Referring to the 25 October 1915 letter, Antonius wrote World War I on 11 November 1914 brought about an that it is: “by far the most important in the whole corre- abrupt shift in British political interests concerning an spondence, and may perhaps be regarded as the most im- Arab revolt against the Ottomans.[8] portant international document in the history of the Arab Following deliberations at Ta'if between Hussein and his national movement... is still invoked as the main piece sons in June 1915, during which Faisal counselled cau- of evidence on which the Arabs accuse Great Britain of [5] tion, Sherif Husayn bin Ali argued against rebellion and having broken faith with them.” Abdullah advocated action and encouraged his father to enter into correspondence with Sir Henry McMahon, the Sharif set a tentative date for armed revolt for June 1916 1 The Damascus Protocol and commenced negotiations with the British High Com- missioner in Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon.[6] Main article: Damascus Protocol 2 The territorial reservations The letter from McMahon to Hussein dated 24 October 1915 declared Britain’s willingness to recognize the in- dependence of the Arabs subject to certain exemptions. Note that the original correspondence was conducted in both English and Arabic, such that various slightly differ- ing English translations are extant. Henry The districts of Mersina and Alexandretta, McMahon and Hussein bin Ali and portions of Syria lying to the west of 1 2 3 THE ARAB REVOLT the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and asked me, as a free agent, to endorse the promises of Aleppo, cannot be said to be purely Arab, and the British Government. I had had no previous or inner must on that account be excepted from the pro- knowledge of the McMahon pledges and the Sykes-Picot posed limits and boundaries. treaty, which were both framed by war-time branches of With the above modification and with- the Foreign Office. But, not being a perfect fool, I could out prejudice to our existing treaties con- see that if we won the war the promises to the Arabs were cluded with Arab Chiefs, we accept these lim- dead paper. Had I been an honourable adviser I would its and boundaries, and in regard to the terri- have sent my men home, and not let them risk their lives tories therein in which Great Britain is free to for such stuff. Yet the Arab inspiration was our main tool act without detriment to interests of her ally in winning the Eastern war. So I assured them that Eng- France, I am empowered in the name of the land kept her word in letter and spirit. In this comfort Government of Great Britain to give the fol- they performed their fine things: but, of course, instead lowing assurance and make the following reply of being proud of what we did together, I was continually to your letter: and bitterly ashamed. Subject to the above modifications, Great T. E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) in his autobio- Britain is prepared to recognize and support the graphical Seven Pillars of Wisdom, 1922[11] independence of the Arabs within the territo- ries in the limits and boundaries proposed by McMahon’s promises were seen by the Arabs as a formal the Sherif of Mecca.[9] agreement between them and the United Kingdom. Lloyd George and Arthur Balfour represented the agreement as a treaty during the post war deliberations of the Council Declassified British Cabinet Papers include a telegram of Four. On this understanding the Arabs established a dated 19 October 1915 from Sir Henry McMahon to the military force under the command of Hussein’s son Faisal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Lord Grey, re- [10] which fought, with inspiration from 'Lawrence of Arabia', questing instructions. McMahon said the clause had against the Ottoman Empire during the Arab Revolt.[7] In been suggested by a man named Muhammed Sharif al- an intelligence memo written in January 1916 Lawrence Faruqi, a member of the Abd party, to satisfy the de- described the Arab Revolt as mands of the Syrian Nationalists for the independence of Arabia. Faroqi had said that the Arabs would fight if the French attempted to occupy the cities of Damas- beneficial to us, because it marches with cus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo, but he thought they would our immediate aims, the break up of the Is- accept some modification of the North-Western bound- lamic 'bloc' and the defeat and disruption of aries proposed by the Sherif of Mecca. Faroqi suggested the Ottoman Empire, and because the states the language: “In so far as Britain was free to act with- [Sharif Hussein] would set up to succeed the out detriment to the interests of her present Allies, Great Turks would be … harmless to ourselves … The Britain accepts the principle of the independence of Ara- Arabs are even less stable than the Turks. If bia within limits propounded by the Sherif of Mecca.” properly handled they would remain in a state Lord Grey authorized McMahon to pledge the areas re- of political mosaic, a tissue of small jealous quested by the Sherif subject to the reserve for the Allies. principalities incapable of cohesion (emphasis in original).[12] 3 The Arab Revolt The Arab Revolt began in June 1916, when an Arab army of around 70,000 men moved against Ottoman forces. They participated in the capture of Aqabah and the sev- Main article: Arab Revolt ering of the Hejaz railway, a vital strategic link through the Arab peninsula which ran from Damascus to Medina. The Arab Revolt had begun on false pretences. To gain This enabled the Egyptian Expeditionary Force under the the Sherif’s help our Cabinet had offered, through Sir command of General Allenby to advance into the Ot- Henry McMahon, to support the establishment of native toman territories of Palestine and Syria.[13] governments in parts of Syria and Mesopotamia, 'sav- ing the interests of our ally, France'. The last mod- The British advance culminated in the Battle of Megiddo est clause concealed a treaty (kept secret, till too late, in September 1918 and the capitulation of Turkey on 31 from McMahon, and therefore from the Sherif) by which October 1918. France, England and Russia agreed to annex some of The Arab revolt is seen by historians as the first organized these promised areas, and to establish their respective movement of Arab nationalism. It brought together dif- spheres of influence over all the rest... Rumours of the ferent Arab groups for the first time with the common fraud reached Arab ears, from Turkey. In the East per- goal to fight for independence from the Ottoman Empire. sons were more trusted than institutions. So the Arabs, Much of the history of Arabic independence stemmed having tested my friendliness and sincerity under fire, from the revolt beginning with the kingdom founded by 4.3 Declaration to the Seven 3 Hussein. After the war was over, the Arab revolt had im- Jewish State in Palestine, nor was I instructed to warn him plications.
Recommended publications
  • The Sacred and the Profane
    Kimberly Katz. Jordanian Jerusalem: Holy Places and National Spaces. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2005. xvi + 150 pp. $59.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-8130-2844-6. Reviewed by Michael Fischbach Published on H-Levant (October, 2007) One of the topics that has generated consider‐ time) as well as to maintain these changing identi‐ able scholarly interest in the past decade, within ties in the face of powerful regional currents, the various disciplines dealing with modern Mid‐ forces, events, and neighbors that often (if not dle Eastern history, is the question of how nation‐ usually) have militated against these efforts. For al identity is created. Various factors, from socio- example, the fact that Jordan's Hashemite mon‐ economic to cultural and spatial, have been ana‐ archs have embraced and celebrated the lyzed by those seeking to discover how national Hashemite family's traditionalist and pro-Western communities--what Benedict Anderson's seminal Arab nationalist credentials frequently has collid‐ 1991 book calls "imagined communities"--are ed with the anti-Western, anti-colonial sentiments formed. Despite the fact that all the modern-day so often found among Arabs in the twentieth cen‐ states of the Fertile Crescent were creations of tury, including those living in Jordan itself. This Western imperialism, Jordan has been the subject was particularly true in the mid-twentieth centu‐ of particular focus in regard to this issue. What ry, when so many of the traditional values upon factors have gone into the creation of a Jordanian
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGINS of the PALESTINE MANDATE by Adam Garfinkle
    NOVEMBER 2014 ORIGINS OF THE PALESTINE MANDATE By Adam Garfinkle Adam Garfinkle, Editor of The American Interest Magazine, served as the principal speechwriter to Secretary of State Colin Powell. He has also been editor of The National Interest and has taught at Johns Hopkins University’s School for Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the University of Pennsylvania, Haverford College and other institutions of higher learning. An alumnus of FPRI, he currently serves on FPRI’s Board of Advisors. This essay is based on a lecture he delivered to FPRI’s Butcher History Institute on “Teaching about Israel and Palestine,” October 25-26, 2014. A link to the the videofiles of each lecture can be found here: http://www.fpri.org/events/2014/10/teaching-about- israel-and-palestine Like everything else historical, the Palestine Mandate has a history with a chronological beginning, a middle, and, in this case, an end. From a strictly legal point of view, that beginning was September 29, 1923, and the end was midnight, May 14, 1948, putting the middle expanse at just short of 25 years. But also like everything else historical, it is no simple matter to determine either how far back in the historical tapestry to go in search of origins, or how far to lean history into its consequences up to and speculatively beyond the present time. These decisions depend ultimately on the purposes of an historical inquiry and, whatever historical investigators may say, all such inquiries do have purposes, whether recognized, admitted, and articulated or not. A.J.P. Taylor’s famous insistence that historical analysis has no purpose other than enlightened storytelling, rendering the entire enterprise much closer to literature than to social science, is interesting precisely because it is such an outlier perspective among professional historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Even Past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST
    "The past is never dead. It's not even past." William Faulkner NOT EVEN PAST Search the site ... A Prince of Our Disorder: Like 19 The Life of T.E. Lawrence, Tweet by John E. Mack (1976) By Emily Whalen David Lean’s magisterial lm epic, Lawrence of Arabia (1962) gave us a mythic hero struggling against impossible odds. The lm’s theatrical merits—breathtaking cinematography, nuanced performances, riveting score—cemented Western audiences’ enduring interest in the title character, but offered little factual substance about the life of a compelling and controversial historical gure, and supported a lopsided view of the 20th century Middle East. The lm best serves as a gateway to understanding the real Lawrence and the legacy of British Colonialism in a still-tumultuous region. Peter O’Toole as T. E. Lawrence in Lawrence of Arabia. Via Wikipedia. If the nearly four-hour movie is an introduction, T.E. Lawrence’s own memoir, Seven Pillars of Wisdom, is a 600-page next step. Lawrence acionados bear the badge of completing the windswept tome with great pride: the author records labyrinthine tribal relationships and the minutiae of desert battles in its densely detailed pages to many readers’ great exhaustion. Yet Seven Pillars continues to capture the imagination of readers interested in Britain and the Middle East during World War I with its arresting poetry. Some might initially balk at the book’s bulk, but by the time Lawrence describes a night of feasting under the stars with Auda ibu Tayi and the Howeitat Bedouins, the spell has been cast.
    [Show full text]
  • • International Court of Justice • • • • •
    • • • INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE • • • • • . Request for an • Advisory Opinion on the • Legal Consequences of the • Construction of a Wall • in the Occupied Palestinian Territories • • WRITTEN STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY • THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN • • • • 30 January 2004 • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1. Introduction • Il. General background • III. Immediate background • IV. Relevant facts V. Relevant legal considerations • (a) The Court' s jurisdiction • (i) The request raises a legal question which the Court has jurisdiction ta answer • (ii) There are no compelling reasons which should lead the • Court ta refuse ta give the advisory opinion requested of it. • (b) Applicable legal principles (i) The prohibition of the use of force, and the right of seIf- • determination, are Iules of ius cogens (ii) The territory in whîch the wall has been or is planned to be • constructed constitutes occupied territory for purposes of international law • (lii) The law applicable in respect of occupied territory limîts • the occupying State's power$ (iv) Occupied territory cannot be annexed by the occupying • State • (c) Applicable legal principles and the construction of the wall (i) The occupying State does not have the right effectively to • alIDex occupied territory or otherwise to alter its status (ii) The occupying State does not have the right to alter the • population balance in the occupîed territory by estabIishing alien • settlements • ->- :.• 1 1. • -11- (iii) The occupying State lS not entitled in occupied territory to construct a wall
    [Show full text]
  • The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917-1947 / by Fred Lennis Lepkin
    THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND ZIONISM: 1917 - 1947 FRED LENNIS LEPKIN BA., University of British Columbia, 196 1 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History @ Fred Lepkin 1986 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1986 All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. Name : Fred Lennis Lepkin Degree: M. A. Title of thesis: The British Labour Party and Zionism, - Examining Committee: J. I. Little, Chairman Allan B. CudhgK&n, ior Supervisor . 5- - John Spagnolo, ~upervis&y6mmittee Willig Cleveland, Supepiso$y Committee -Lenard J. Cohen, External Examiner, Associate Professor, Political Science Dept.,' Simon Fraser University Date Approved: August 11, 1986 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Title of Thesis/Project/Extended Essay The British Labour Party and Zionism, 1917 - 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Broken Promises: the Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian
    Britain’s Broken Promises: The Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian Conflict Overview Students will learn about British control over Palestine after World War I and how it influenced the Israel‐Palestine situation in the modern Middle East. The material will be introduced through a timeline activity and followed by a PowerPoint that covers many of the post‐WWI British policies. The lesson culminates in a letter‐writing project where students have to support a position based upon information learned. Grade 9 NC Essential Standards for World History • WH.1.1: Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines • WH.1.3: Consider multiple perspectives of various peoples in the past • WH.5.3: Analyze colonization in terms of the desire for access to resources and markets as well as the consequences on indigenous cultures, population, and environment • WH.7.3: Analyze economic and political rivalries, ethnic and regional conflicts, and nationalism and imperialism as underlying causes of war Materials • “Steps Toward Peace in Israel and Palestine” Timeline (excerpt attached) • History of Israel/Palestine Timeline Questions and Answer Key, attached • Drawing paper or chart paper • Colored pencils or crayons (optional) • “Britain’s Broken Promises” PowerPoint, available in the Database of K‐12 Resources (in PDF format) o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode” o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Air Force and Kuwait
    THE ROYAL AIR FORCE AND KUWAIT Please return to the holder for other visitors. Introduction In January 1899 an agreement was reached between Kuwait and the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom agreed to pay an annual subsidy to Kuwait and take responsibility for its security. The Anglo-Ottoman Convention of 1913 con rmed Kuwait’s status as an autonomous region within the Ottoman Empire. The defeat and collapse of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War One, however, led to an unstable situation. In 1920 border disputes led to warfare between Kuwaitis and the Ikhwan tribes from Nejd. At first it was the Ikhwan who were victorious but in October they raided Jahra and were defeated. Sheikh Salim al-Mubarak Al-Sabah of Kuwait claimed to be in control of all territory in a radius of 140 kilometres from the capital but Abdul Aziz ibn Abdul Rahman ibn Sa’ud claimed that the borders of Kuwait did not extend beyond the walls of its capital. The British Government, unwilling at first to intervene, confirmed that it recognised the borders laid down in the 1913 Convention. Eventually the British Government sent warships to protect the Kuwaiti capital and RAF aircraft dropped copies of a communique to the Ikhwan tribesmen. This helped create an uneasy truce between the two countries and established a no man’s land. The 1921 Cairo Conference, chaired by Winston Churchill, established Iraq as a kingdom under King Faisal within the British Mandate. The Royal Air Force was tasked with maintaining peace in the country; it took command with effect from 1 October 1922.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociolinguistic Study in Am, Northern Jordan
    A Sociolinguistic Study in am, Northern Jordan Noora Abu Ain A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Language and Linguistics University of Essex June 2016 2 To my beloved Ibrahim for his love, patience and continuous support 3 Abstract T features in S J T (U) T J : zubde „ ‟ dʒubne „ ‟. On the other hand, the central and southern Jordanian dialects have [i] in similar environments; thus, zibde and dʒibne T (L) T the dark varian t [l] I , : x „ ‟ g „ ‟, other dialects realise it as [l], and thus: x l and g l. These variables are studied in relation to three social factors (age, gender and amount of contact) and three linguistic factors (position in syllable, preceding and following environments). The sample consists of 60 speakers (30 males and 30 females) from three age groups (young, middle and old). The data were collected through sociolinguistic interviews, and analysed within the framework of the Variationist Paradigm using Rbrul statistical package. The results show considerable variation and change in progress in the use of both variables, constrained by linguistic and social factors. , T lowed by a back vowel. For both variables, the young female speakers were found to lead the change towards the non-local variants [i] and [l]. The interpretations of the findings focus on changes that the local community have experienced 4 as a result of urbanisation and increased access to the target features through contact with outside communities. Keywords: Jordan, , variable (U), variable (L), Rbrul, variation and change 5 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE the Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: Proble
    https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ TITLE The implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) AUTHOR Regan, Bernard DATE DEPOSITED 13 April 2016 This version available at https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/id/eprint/1009/ COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Archive makes this work available, in accordance with publisher policies, for research purposes. VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. For citation purposes, please consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication. The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperi- alism (1917–1936) Regan, Bernard (2016) The Implementation of the Balfour Dec- laration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917– 1936) University of Surrey Version: PhD thesis Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individ- ual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open- Research Archive’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult http:// research.stmarys.ac.uk/policies.html http://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) Thesis submitted by Bernard Regan For the award of Doctor of Philosophy School of Arts and Humanities University of Surrey January 2016 ©Bernard Regan 2016 1 Summary The objective of this thesis is to analyse the British Mandate in Palestine with a view to developing a new understanding of the interconnections and dissonances between the principal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump to Navigationjump to Search "Arabia" and "Arabian" Redirect Here
    Arabian Peninsula From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search "Arabia" and "Arabian" redirect here. For other uses, see Arabia (disambiguation) and Arabian (disambiguation). Arabian Peninsula Area 3.2 million km2 (1.25 million mi²) Population 77,983,936 Demonym Arabian Countries Saudi Arabia Yemen Oman United Arab Emirates Kuwait Qatar Bahrain -shibhu l-jazīrati l ِش ْبهُ ا ْل َج ِزي َرةِ ا ْلعَ َربِيَّة :The Arabian Peninsula, or simply Arabia[1] (/əˈreɪbiə/; Arabic jazīratu l-ʿarab, 'Island of the Arabs'),[2] is َج ِزي َرةُ ا ْلعَ َرب ʿarabiyyah, 'Arabian peninsula' or a peninsula of Western Asia situated northeast of Africa on the Arabian plate. From a geographical perspective, it is considered a subcontinent of Asia.[3] It is the largest peninsula in the world, at 3,237,500 km2 (1,250,000 sq mi).[4][5][6][7][8] The peninsula consists of the countries Yemen, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.[9] The peninsula formed as a result of the rifting of the Red Sea between 56 and 23 million years ago, and is bordered by the Red Sea to the west and southwest, the Persian Gulf to the northeast, the Levant to the north and the Indian Ocean to the southeast. The peninsula plays a critical geopolitical role in the Arab world due to its vast reserves of oil and natural gas. The most populous cities on the Arabian Peninsula are Riyadh, Dubai, Jeddah, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Kuwait City, Sanaʽa, and Mecca. Before the modern era, it was divided into four distinct regions: Red Sea Coast (Tihamah), Central Plateau (Al-Yamama), Indian Ocean Coast (Hadhramaut) and Persian Gulf Coast (Al-Bahrain).
    [Show full text]
  • The Istiqlalis in Transjordan, 1920-1926 by Ghazi
    A Divided Camp: The Istiqlalis in Transjordan, 1920-1926 by Ghazi Jarrar Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2016 © Copyright by Ghazi Jarrar, 2016 Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................v Chapter One: Introduction.................................................................................................................1 Background.....................................................................................................................................3 Historiography...........................................................................................................................11 Project Parameters and Outline..........................................................................................26 A Note on Sources.....................................................................................................................29 Chapter Two: The Militant Istiqlalis...........................................................................................31 Background..................................................................................................................................32 The Militant Istiqlalis: Part
    [Show full text]
  • BEHIND CLOSED DOORS Torture and Detention in Egypt Torture And
    BBBEHIND CCCLOSED DDDOORS Torture and Detention in Egypt A Middle East Watch Report Human Rights Watch New York !!! Washington !!! Los Angeles !!! London Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch is composed of Africa Watch, Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch, Middle East Watch, and the Fund for Free Expression. The executive committee comprises Robert L. Bernstein, chair; Adrian DeWind, vice chair; Roland Algrant, Lisa Anderson, Peter Bell, Alice Brown, William Carmichael, Dorothy Cullman, Irene Diamond, Jonathan Fanton, Jack Greenberg, Alice H. Henkin, Stephen Kass, Marina Kaufman, Jeri Laber, Aryeh Neier, Bruce Rabb, Harriet Rabb, Kenneth Roth, Orville Schell, Gary Sick, and Robert Wedgeworth. The staff includes Aryeh Neier, executive director; Kenneth Roth, deputy director; Holly J. Burkhalter, Washington director; Ellen Lutz, California director; Susan Osnos, press director; Jemera Rone, counsel; Joanna Weschler, Prison Project director; and Dorothy Q. Thomas, Women's Rights Project director. Executive Directors Africa Watch Americas Watch Asia Watch Rakiya Omaar Juan E. Méndez Sidney Jones Helsinki Watch Middle East Watch Fund for Free Expression Jeri Laber Andrew Whitley Gara LaMarche Addresses for Human Rights Watch 485 Fifth Avenue 1522 K Street, NW, Suite 910 New York, NY 10017-6104 Washington, DC 20005-1202 Tel: (212) 972-8400 Tel: (202) 371-6592 Fax: (212) 972-0905 Fax: (202) 371-0124 10951 West Pico Blvd., #203 90 Borough High Street Los Angeles, CA 90064 London, UK SE1 1LL Tel: (213) 475-3070 Tel: (071) 378-8008 Fax: (213) 475-5613 Fax: (071) 378-8029 Copyright 8 July 1992 by Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]