• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Original broadcast: October 7, 2003 BEfoRE WatCHIng Who Killed the Red Baron? Have students look at a map of Europe. Ask them to locate the northeastern section of France, the PRogRAM OVERVIEW famed Western Front of World War I. Discuss some basic facts about NOVA explores the controversial death World War I. How did it start? When of the World War I fighter pilot Manfred did it occur? Who were the combat- von Richthofen, known as the Red Baron. ants? 2 Conduct the “Who Made the The program: Mess?” activity on page 2. After • recounts the conventional version of the downing of the Red Baron the activity is completed, have by Canadian RAF pilot Captain Roy Brown. students take notes on the facts • reviews alternative theories and claims about who was responsible, uncovered in the program’s forensic investigation. including several Australian soldiers shooting from the ground. • relates the Red Baron’s background, including his decision to become a pilot in 95 and his subsequent appointment to lead a AftER WatCHIng squadron two years later. • tells how the Red Baron gained his legendary nickname by paint- Discuss with your class how the ing his Albatros fighter bright red and explores why he became a use of the airplane evolved dur- wartime celebrity. ing World War I. (Used for surveil- lance, dropping bombs, dog fights • describes the development of military aviation during World War between two planes, large battles I, including the invention of a device that allows a machine gun to between groups of planes.) Discuss fire through the path of a propeller. how the airplane changed the • discusses the evolution of air-to-air combat tactics and the strate- nature of warfare. (Opened up a gic organization of fighter plane squadrons. new front for combat, enabled spying or killing from a distance, • details the final battle in which the Red Baron was killed. and made technology of greater • examines ballistics, correspondence, and eyewitness accounts sur- importance in determining who rounding the shooting. won the war.) • advances new evidence to confirm a leading theory for the Red 2 Review the forensic evidence Baron’s death. that led modern-day historians to change their interpretation of who shot the Red Baron. (Records from autopsy and eyewitness reports Taping Rights: Can be used up to one year after the program is taped off the air. showed bullet pathway consistent with someone shooting up from ground.) What were the key facts that led to the hypothesis that Sergeant Cedric Popkin killed the Red Baron? NOVA TEACHER’S GUIDE www.pbs.org/nova/redbaron/ CLASSRooM ACTIVITY StanDARDS ConnECTIon Objective To learn how to apply deductive thinking to evaluate evidence and draw The “Who Made the Mess?” activity aligns with the following National conclusions. Science Education Standards. Materials for teacher GRADES 5–8 • copies of the “Fact Sets” student handout Science Standard A: • envelopes Science as Inquiry Abilities necessary to do • scissors science inquiry • Think critically and logically to make Materials for each group the relationships between evidence • copy of the “Who Made the Mess?” student handout and explanations. • envelopes containing Fact Set , Fact Set 2, and Fact Set 3 GRADES 9–2 • scissors Science Standard A: Science as Inquiry Procedure Abilities necessary to do Deductive reasoning can be applied to factual information to help science inquiry reconstruct historical events. Tell students that they will be doing an • Formulate and revise scientific activity in which they will apply deductive reasoning. explanations and models using logic and evidence. 2 Copy enough versions of the “Fact Sets” student handout so that each group of three will receive a complete set of facts. Cut out and place Fact Set , Fact Set 2, and Fact Set 3 together into an envelope for each Video is not required group. for this activity. 3 Organize the class into groups of three and provide each group with copies of the “Who Made the Mess?” student handout and a “Fact Sets” envelope. 4 Have one student from each group choose a fact set from the envelope and read the facts to the other group members. Have students decide which facts in the set are most relevant and the sequence in which they may have occurred. Then have students form a hypothesis of what may have happened based on the fact set. Ask students to rate their confi- dence level in their hypothesis. 5 Instruct a second student in each group to choose another fact set from the envelope. Have students revisit their rankings of relevance and rese- quence and revise the facts as needed. Ask students to repeat the pro- Classroom Activity Author cedure with the third person in the group for the final set of facts. James Sammons has taught middle 6 Have each member cut his or her set of facts into separate strips, with and high school science for 30 years. His teaching practices have one fact for each strip. Allow groups enough time to determine rel- been recognized by the National evance and sequence of all 5 facts and to support the group’s conclu- Science Teachers Association, the sion about the cause of the mess. Soil Conservation Service, and the 7 Discuss as a class the various conclusions groups reached. Allow groups National Association of Geoscience to compare their interpretations and debate any disagreements. Did any Teachers. A former research biolo- gist, Sammons continues to par- one fact set seem more conclusive than another? If so, why? How did ticipate in basic research. He is a additional fact sets change students’ theories about the event? member of the Geological Society 8 As an extension, assign students to find out other ways that deductive of America and the American reasoning is applied to forensic investigations. Geophysical Union. WHO KILLED THE RED baRon? 2 NOVA TEACHER’S GUIDE 2 www.pbs.org/nova/redbaron/ ACTIVITY ANSWER teams might show that the door was opened by the wind or left Here is one interpretation of the open by the boys and that the mail facts using the fewest facts pos- arrived last, neither point is signifi- sible to support the conclusion. cant to the conclusion. The key facts have been arranged below in the order in which they The remaining facts are supportive may have occurred. Note that facts. Some teams may disagree sequence is determined by when about whether a fact is important an event occurred, not by when it or supportive. For example, “There became known. were wet shoe prints, now dry, on the floor” seems important but can . The flour bag was on the floor. It be considered supportive because was torn open and spilled. it is redundant with Fact 2. 2. Muddy footprints were found entering and exiting the kitchen. The fact sets were deliberately 3. A fine layer of flour covered the assembled to suggest an unsup- dried footprints. ported idea. Set suggests the 4. There were squirrel tracks in the squirrel(s), Set 2 suggests the flour leaving the kitchen but none weather, and Set 3 suggests the entering were found. boys. Although teams will con- clude that the squirrel(s) made the From these facts, one conclusion mess, compelling evidence cannot that could be drawn is that the be assembled from any single fact boys arrived some time after the set. When a class is assembled as rain because “muddy footprints groups, there are usually students were found entering and exiting who would rather work alone for the kitchen” (Fact 2). The boys left various reasons. This activity high- the kitchen before the flour bag lights the contributions of individ- fell because the flour “covered the uals working cooperatively and the dried footprints” (Fact 3). A squir- summative power of a group. rel left the kitchen after the flour spilled (Fact 4). One conclusion could be that the flour fell from the counter during the squirrel visit (Facts and 4). The fact that the bag was torn open suggests that the squirrel made the mess rather than the wind blowing in from outside. However, students can’t know for sure how the flour was knocked off the counter. Although WHO KILLED THE RED baRon? 3 NOVA TEACHER’S GUIDE 3 www.pbs.org/nova/redbaron/ LInkS & bookS Links Books NOVA Web Site -- Who Killed the Franks, Norman and Alan Bennett. Red Baron? The Red Baron’s Last Flight. www.pbs.org/nova/redbaron/ St. Catharines, Ontario: Vanwell In this companion Web site for the Publishing Ltd., 997. NOVA program, view a pictorial Investigates the controversy over von timeline of World War I aviation Richthofen’s last flight. innovations, read the Red Baron's Kilduff, Peter. writings, explore competing theo- Richthofen: Beyond the Legend of the ries about the Red Baron's death, Red Baron. and follow the life of one U.S. fighter New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 994. who voluntarily joined Allied forces. Provides a biography of von Richthofen, Crime Scene Investigator written by a historian with extensive crime-scene-investigator.net/ access to previously unpublished Provides guidelines for crime scene German sources. response and evidence collection, articles on crime scene examination, Kilduff, Peter. and tips on how to become a crime The Illustrated Red Baron. scene investigator. London: Arms & Armour, 999. Provides a pictorial review of von The Death of Manfred von Richthofen’s life, including the high- Richthofen: Who Fired the Fatal lights of his career. Shot? www.ku.edu/~kansite/ww_one/ comment/richt.htm Discusses the controversy regarding who was responsible for the Red Baron’s death. The Red Baron’s Last Flight history1900s.about.com/library/ weekly/aa052401a.htm Describes von Richthofen’s life, including his final battle.

Load more

  6

Copy Link