1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864 Methodist Episcopal Church, South

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864 Methodist Episcopal Church, South Asbury Theological Seminary ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Conference Journals Methodist Episcopal Church, South 2017 1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864 Methodist Episcopal Church, South Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/mechsouthconfjournals Part of the Appalachian Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the Genealogy Commons Recommended Citation Methodist Episcopal Church, South, "1864 Minutes of the Annual Conferences of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, for the Year 1864" (2017). Conference Journals. 20. http://place.asburyseminary.edu/mechsouthconfjournals/20 This Periodical/Journal is brought to you for free and open access by the Methodist Episcopal Church, South at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Conference Journals by an authorized administrator of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL CONFERENCES OF THE FOR THE YEAR 1864 . • I •• ,. ~lu~billtt ~tnn.: SOUTHERN !\IETHODIST PUBLISHING HOUSE. 1870. BISHOPS OF THE lIETHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, SOUTH. JQSHUA SOULE, D. D., NASHVILLE, T ENN. JAMES OSGOOD ANDRE 'V, D. D., SUMMERFIELD, ALA. ROBERT P ArNE, D. D., ABERDEEN, MISS. GEORGE FOSTER PIERC1E, D. D., CULVERTON, GA. JOHN EARLY, D. D., LYNCHBURG, VA. HUBBARD HINDE KAVANAUGH, D. D., VERSAILLES, Ky. MINUTES. '1. I.-KENTUCKY CONFERENCE. HELD AT MAYSVILLE, Ky., September 7-12, 1864. J. C. HARRISON, Prewidentj DANIEL STEVENSON, Secretary. QUESTION 1. Who are admitted on trial? William Atherton. 1. ANSWER. Daniel M. Bonner. 1. No memoir. Ques. 2. Who remain on trial? Ques. 15. Are all the preachers blameless in J. J. Johnson, J. A. Humphrey. 2. their life and official administra tion ? Quas. 3. Who are admitted into full connec­ Their names were called over, one by one, and tion? their characters examined and passed, except L. J. T. S. Smith, J. W. Zimmerman, G. T. Gould, D. Huston, whose case was again referred to the J. E. Letton. 4. Presiding Elder of Covington District for inves­ tigation j the cases of J. W. Ridgell and C. W. Ques.4. Who are readmitted? Miller were referred to the PreSIding .Elder of None. Harrodsburg District for investigation. Ques. 5. Who are received by transfer from Ques.16. What is the number of preachers other Conferences? and members in the several circuits, stations, George W. Dungan. 1. and missions of the Conference? Ques. 6. Who are the deacons of one year? Whitelrobationers, 874 Josiah Fitch, T. J. Dodd, H. W. Abbett. 3. Colore probationers, 261 Ques. 7. What traveling preachers are elected White members, 14,029 a.nd ordained deacons? Quee.17. What amounts are necessary for the None. superannuated preachers, and the widows and Ques. 8. What local preachers are elected and orphans of preachers, and to make up the defi­ ordained deacons? ciencies of those who have not obtamed their Peyton F. Adams,* J as. Witt,* Aaron Green * regular allowance in their respective districts, (colored), Wyatt Triplett* (colored). 4. circuits, and stations? Ques. 9. What traveling preachers are elected $37,435 25. and ordained elders? Quae. 18. What has been collected on the fore­ J.W. Fitch,* W. L. Furniss,* L. B. Piersall.* 3. going accounts, and how has it been applied? Ques. 10. What local preachers are elected Collected, $32,727 26 and ordained elders ? Quee. 19. What has been contributed for the William ShermaD,* D. D. Duty.* 2. Missionary, Sunday-school, a.nd Tract Societies? Quee. 11. Who have located this year? For Missions, $943 85 D. W. Axline, J. F. Vanpelt, Elias Botner, Ques. 20. Where and when shall the next ses­ W. J. Snively, T. G. Bosley. 5. sion of the Conference be held? Ques. 12. Who are supernumerary? At Covington, Ky. E. P. Buckner. 1. Ques. 21. Where are the preachers stationed Ques. 13. Who are superannuated? this year? George W. Maley, S. Veach, T. R. Ma.lone, Isaac Collard, Thomas Hall, W. B. Landrum, LEXINGTON DISTRICT. L. C. Danley, J. Sandusky, J. C. Hardy. 9. John G. Bruce, P. E. Ques. 14. What preachers have died during Lexington: the past year? First Charge, W. F. T. Spruill. Second Charge, to be supplied. • Elected, but not ordained. Frankfort, G. W. Merritt. (479) 480 Kentucky Oonference, 1864. Georgetown, to be supplied. Kenton, Daniel M. Bowman. Nicholasville, Duke Slavens. Newport, W. C. Dandy. Versailles, Stephen Noland, Sup. Alexandria, P. H. Hoffman. Jessamine and Woodford, J. A. Humphrey. Brookville, L. P. Piersall. Winchester and Mount Zion, W. F. Taylor. Falmouth, A. Miner. { Vienna, W. B. Landrum. Odd ville, George W. Smith. Mount Sterling, to be supplied. Millersburg, Samuel Kelly. Oxford, H. J. Perry. Cynthiana, S. X. Hall. Leesburg, R. Lancaster. Carlisle, Milton Mann. Paris and North Middletown, G. S. Savage. { Flat Rock, to be supplied. Kentucky Institute for the Education and Train- Wa'rsaw, J. H. Brookmg. ing of Feeble-minded Children, Wm. McD. Crittenden, Orson Long. Abbett, Superintendent. Burlington, T. F. Vanmeter. Owenton and Eagle Creek Mission, to be sup­ L. D. Parker, Chaplain Eighteenth Regiment plied. Kentucky Volunteer Infantry. Millersburg Male High School, T. J. Dodd, Prin­ cipal. HARRODSBURG DISTRICT. Educational Fund, S. L. Robertson, Agent. J. R. Bads, P. E. Harrodsburg, Joseph Rand. MAYSVILLE DISTRICT. Lawrenceburg, to be supplied. E Johnson, P. E. Perryville, William Bickers. Maxville, George W. Dungan. Maysville, B. Messick. Danville, Stanford, and Lancaster, H. P. Walker. Washington and Germantown, T. P. C. Shel· Bryantsville, W. W. Chamberlain. roan. Madison, to be supplied. Shannon and Sardis, J. C. C. Thompson. { Richmond and Providence, J amesE. Letton. Mount Olivet, F. J. Johns. Crab Orchard, Joshua S. Taylor. Flemingsburg, E. M. Cole. Somerset, J. T. S. Smith. Tilton, George L. Gould. Pulaski, to be supplied. Poplar Plains and Hillsboro, W. D. Power. Irvine, John L. Gragg. Owingsville, W. H. Parker. Sharpsburg and Bethel, B. F. Sedwick. SHELBYVILLE DISTRICT. Lewis, W. L. Furniss. Jedidiah Foster, P. E. { Richland, J. W. Zimmerman. Orangeburg, Josiah W. Fitch. Shelbyville, H. C. Northcott. Shelby Circuit, W. G. Johns. Taylorsville, G. W. Crumbaugh. MISSION DISTRICT. Bloomfield, W. H. Winter. P. E., to be supplied. La Grange, W. C. Atmore. Westport, J. Strother. London, to be supplied. Bedford, T. J. Godbey, Barboursville and Manchester, to be supplied. Carrollton, Peter E. K'avanaugh. Booneville and Proctor, to be supplied. Newcastle, W. T. Benton. Williamsburg, to be supplied. Lockport, Thomas Rankin. Yellow Creek, to be supplied. Simpsonville, J. S. Coxe. Mount Vernon, to be supplied. Carroll Male and Female Academy, J. J. John­ Morehead, to be supplied. ston, Principal; H. W. Abbett, Teacher of Morgan, to be supplied. Languages. Prestonburg and Piketon, to be supplied. Jackson, to be supplied. John S. Bayles, Chaplain Sixteenth Regiment Mount Pleasant, to be supplied. Kentucky Volunteer Infantry. Whitesburg, to be supplied. COVINGTON DISTRICT. J. D. Onins, transferred to Western Virginia W. B. Kavanaugh, P. E. Conference, and stationed at Parkersburg. L. G. Hicks, transferred to Louisville Con­ Covington, J. C. Harrison, E. P. Buckner, Sup. ference. Louisville Oorife1oence, 1864. 481 2.-LOUISVI.LLE CONFERENCE. HELD AT HENDERSON, Ky., October 19-, 1864. BISHOP KAVANAUGH, President; N. H. LEE, Seeretary. QUESTION 1. Who are admitted on trial? was married a second time to Miss Annie Hock­ ANSWER. John W. Price, Thomas D. Payne, ersmith, Feb. 15, 1855; and died at Madisonville, Wm. T. Davenport, Francis M. Rose. 4. Ky., Oct. 15, 1863. He joined the M. E. Church Ques. 2. Who remain on trial? when about twenty years of age. Of the cir­ Daniel H. Limebaugh, Andrew D. Gray, Dan­ cumstances of his conversion and call t.o the iel S. Campbell. 3. ministry, nothing is known by the committee. Ques. 3. Who are admitted into full connec- He was admitted into the traveling connection tion? in the Louisville Conference in 1846, and con­ tinued a regular effective preacher until the fall Wm. R. Johnson, Montgomery M. Hunter. 2. of 1859, fillmg a number of important appoint­ Ques.4. Who are readmitted? ments with great acceptability and usefulness. None. At the Conference which was held this year, he Ques. 5. Who are received by transfer from was compelled-by a painful disease from which other Conferen~es ? he had been suffering intensely for several years, None. and which would have caused anyone not thor­ Ques.6. Who are the deacons of one year? oughly devoted to the work to have retired Timothy C. Peters, Dennis Spurrier, Wm. T. from the effective ranks long before-to accept Reid. 3. a superannuated relation, in which he continued Ques. 7. What traveling preachers are elected tillliis death. He bore his afflictions with great and ordained deacons? patience and resignation, and during his last Daniel H. Limebaugh, W. R. Johnson, Mont­ hours expressed himself as fully ready for death. gomery When asked by a brother who was with him to M. Hunter. 3. the last, "Do you have any doubt as to your Ques. 8. What local preachers are elected and acceptance with God?" he replied readily and ordained deacons? emphatically, "No, sir; the Lord will not for­ Gideon McDaniel, James S. Parish, Benjamin sake me." Again he was asked, "Do you enter­ F. Biggs, Wm. T. Davenport, 4; Israel Simms, tain an., doubt about going to heaven after (colored.) I,: death?' To which he replied, "No, no. Though Ques. 9. What traveling preachers are elected I walk through the valley of the shadow of and ordained elders? death, I will fear no evil." When asked if he James A. Lewis, Samuel C. Allen, E. W. Bot­ had any message to send to his brethren of the tomley, Thomas G. Harrison, Philip G. Hardi­ Conference, he said, "Tell them that up to the son, Thos.
Recommended publications
  • The Korean-American Methodists' Response to the UMC Debate Over
    religions Article Loving My New Neighbor: The Korean-American Methodists’ Response to the UMC Debate over LGBTQ Individuals in Everyday Life Jeyoul Choi Department of Religion, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The recent nationwide debate of American Protestant churches over the ordination and consecration of LGBTQ clergymen and laypeople has been largely divisive and destructive. While a few studies have paid attention to individual efforts of congregations to negotiate the heated conflicts as their contribution to the denominational debate, no studies have recounted how post-1965 immigrants, often deemed as “ethnic enclaves apart from larger American society”, respond to this religious issue. Drawing on an ethnographic study of a first-generation Korean Methodist church in the Tampa Bay area, Florida, this article attempts to fill this gap in the literature. In brief, I argue that the Tampa Korean-American Methodists’ continual exposure to the Methodist Church’s larger denominational homosexuality debate and their personal relationships with gay and lesbian friends in everyday life together work to facilitate their gradual tolerance toward sexual minorities as a sign of their accommodation of individualistic and democratic values of American society. Keywords: homosexuality and LGBTQ people; United Methodist Church; post-1965 immigrants; Korean-American evangelicals Citation: Choi, Jeyoul. 2021. Loving My New Neighbor: The Korean-American Methodists’ Response to the UMC Debate over 1. Introduction LGBTQ Individuals in Everyday Life. The discourses of homosexuality and LGBTQ individuals in American Protestantism Religions 12: 561. https://doi.org/ are polarized by the research that enunciates each denomination’s theological stance 10.3390/rel12080561 and conflicts over the case studies of individual sexual minorities’ struggle within their congregations.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith Retouched Photograph of a Dagurreotype
    07 the joseph smith retouched photograph0 of a dagurreotypedaguerreotype of a painting or copy of daguerrotypedaguerreotype from the carter collection LDS church archives parting the veil the visions of joseph smith alexander L baugh godgrantedgod granted to the prophetjosephprophet joseph thegiftthe gift of visions joseph received so many that they became almost commonplacecommonplacefor for him the strength and knowledge joseph received through these visions helped him establish the church joseph smith the seer ushered in the dispensation of the fullness of times his role was known and prophesied of anciently the lord promised joseph of egypt that in the last days a choice seer would come through his lineage and would bring his seed to a knowledge of the covenants made to abraham isaac and jacob 2 nephi 37 JST gen 5027 28 that seer will the lord bless joseph prophesied specifically indicating that his name shall be called after me 2 nephi 314 15 see also JST gen 5033 significantly in the revelation received during the organizational meeting of the church on april 61830 the first title given to the first elder was that of seer behold there shall be a record kept and in it thou joseph smith shalt be called a seer a translator a prophet an apostle of jesus christ dacd&c 211 in the book of mormon ammon defined a seer as one who possessed a gift from god to translate ancient records mosiah 813 see also 2811 16 however the feericseeric gift is not limited to translation hence ammon s addi- tional statement that a seer is a revelator and a
    [Show full text]
  • “For This Ordinance Belongeth to My House”: the Practice of Baptism for the Dead Outside the Nauvoo Temple
    Alexander L. Baugh: Baptism for the Dead Outside Temples 47 “For This Ordinance Belongeth to My House”: The Practice of Baptism for the Dead Outside the Nauvoo Temple Alexander L. Baugh The Elders’ Journal of July 1838, published in Far West, Missouri, includ- ed a series of twenty questions related to Mormonism. The answers to the questions bear the editorial pen of Joseph Smith. Question number sixteen posed the following query: “If the Mormon doctrine is true, what has become of all those who have died since the days of the apostles?” The Prophet answered, “All those who have not had an opportunity of hearing the gospel, and being administered to by an inspired man in the flesh, must have it hereafter before they can be finally judged.”1 The Prophet’s thought is clear—the dead must have someone in mortality administer the saving ordinances for them to be saved in the kingdom of God. Significantly, the answer given by the Prophet marks his first known statement concerning the doctrine of vicari- ous work for the dead. However, it was not until more than two years later that the principle was put into practice.2 On 15 August 1840, Joseph Smith preached the funeral sermon of Seymour Brunson during which time he declared for the first time the doc- trine of baptism for the dead.3 Unfortunately, there are no contemporary accounts of the Prophet’s discourse. However, Simon Baker was present at the funeral services and later stated that during the meeting the Prophet read extensively from 1 Corinthians 15, then noted a particular widow in the congregation whose son had died without baptism.
    [Show full text]
  • UMC Acronym Guide
    United Methodist Church Acronyms Acronym Meaning Purpose/Definition AGI Agency Group Manages the benefits for all agencies Insurance BMCR Black Methodists for To raise up prophetic and spiritual leaders who will be Church Renewal advocates for the unique needs of Black people in The United Methodist Church BOD Book of Disciplines This is the instrument for setting forth the laws, plan, polity, and process by which United Methodists govern themselves remains constant. It reflects the understanding of the Church and articulates the mission of the UMC (To make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. The Discipline defines what is expected of its laity and clergy as they seek to be effective witnesses in the world as a part of the whole body of Christ. COB Council of Bishops According to the Book of Discipline, "The Church expects the Council of Bishops to speak to the Church and from the Church to the world and to give leadership in the quest for Christian unity and interreligious relationships."[Paragraph 427.2] CPPP Committee on Referred to as 'C3P'. This is a committee that decides on Personnel Policies & policies & procedures. All agencies have a voting Procedures representation in this committee. CT Connection Table Facilitates the Church's program life as determined by the General Conference. Its task is to discern and articulate the vision for the Church and to facilitate the stewardship of the mission, ministries and resources of The UMC. The Connectional Table evaluates how effectively the general program-related agencies carry out the mission and ministry of the church as they work with annual conferences and local churches to fulfill the church’s mission to make disciples for the transformation of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith's Lessons on Leadership
    Education Week 2015 Prepare for “Joseph Smith’s Lessons on Leadership” Taught by Robert Spiel Retrieved from: http://josephsmith.net/article/leading-with-love?lang=eng Introduction Joseph Smith was a remarkable leader. He served as President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; mayor of Nauvoo, one of the largest cities in Illinois; lieutenant-general of the Nauvoo Legion; and in 1844 he was a candidate for President of the United States. What set Joseph Smith apart from other dynamic leaders was the source of his teachings: the God of Heaven. "The best way to obtain truth 1 and wisdom," he taught, "is not to ask it from books, but to go to God in prayer, and obtain divine teaching." 2 Joseph led with love. He recognized the worth of every soul as a child of God. When asked why so many followed him, he replied: "It is because I possess the principle of love. All I can offer the world is a good heart and a good hand." 3 The Prophet refused to place himself above others. Rather, as he humbly said, "I love to wait upon the Saints, and be a servant to all, hoping that I may be exalted in the due time of the Lord." 4 Bereft of pride, 5 Joseph personified the Lord's counsel: "Whosoever will be great among you, . shall be servant of all." 6 Joseph Smith Quotes Nothing is so much calculated to lead people to forsake sin as to take them by the hand, and watch over them with tenderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Separate Unions Formed One United Church by David Oberlin, 1979
    Two Separate Unions Formed One United Church by David Oberlin, 1979 The United Methodist Church is the product of two recent church mergers – one in 1946, which brought the Evangelical and United Brethren in Christ denominations together to form the Evangelical United Brethren Church (hereafter called the EUB Church); and one in 1968, which combined the EUB and Methodist denominations to form the United Methodist Church. Each merger created a new denomination, altered church organization, and had an impact on its membership. This paper examines these two mergers and their impact on members of affected congregations in Union County, Pennsylvania. Located in a rural setting in central Pennsylvania, Union County includes many small communities and two major towns – Lewisburg with almost 9,000 residents, and Mifflinburg with a population close to 7,000. Within the county are 17 United Methodist churches – three of which are former Methodist, and fourteen of which are former EUB. While the United Brethren in Christ Church was active in central Pennsylvania, all of the former EUB congregations in Union County were originally Evangelical. Each of the former Methodist congregations has its own pastor, and ten of the fourteen former EUB congregations make up three circuits within the county. Because there were no United Brethren in Christ churches in Union County, the 1946 merger did not have much of an impact on the congregations of the county. The 1968 merger, on the other hand, had a large impact in Union County because EUB and Methodist churches were located throughout the county. In Mifflinburg and Lewisburg, for example, the 1968 merger resulted in two United Methodist churches located within a block of each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Journal
    Advisory Board Noel B. Reynolds, chair Grant Anderson James P. Bell Donna Lee Bowen Involving Readers Douglas M. Chabries Neal Kramer in the Latter-day Saint John M. Murphy Academic Experience Editor in Chief John W. Welch Church History Board Richard Bennett, chair 19th-century history Brian Q. Cannon 20th-century history Kathryn Daynes 19th-century history Gerrit J. Dirkmaat Joseph Smith, 19th-century Mormonism Steven C. Harper documents Frederick G. Williams cultural history Liberal Arts and Sciences Board Barry R. Bickmore, chair geochemistry Justin Dyer family science, family and religion Daryl Hague Spanish and Portuguese Susan Howe English, poetry, drama Steven C. Walker Christian literature Reviews Board Gerrit van Dyk, chair Church history Trevor Alvord new media Herman du Toit art, museums Specialists Casualene Meyer poetry editor Thomas R. Wells photography editor Ashlee Whitaker cover art editor STUDIES QUARTERLY BYU Vol. 57 • No. 3 • 2018 ARTICLES 4 From the Editor 7 Reclaiming Reality: Doctoring and Discipleship in a Hyperconnected Age Tyler Johnson 39 Understanding the Abrahamic Covenant through the Book of Mormon Noel B. Reynolds 81 The Language of the Original Text of the Book of Mormon Royal Skousen 111 Joseph Smith’s Iowa Quest for Legal Assistance: His Letters to Edward Johnstone and Others on Sunday, June 23, 1844 John W. Welch 143 Martin Harris Comes to Utah, 1870 Susan Easton Black and Larry C. Porter ESSAY 75 Wandering On to Glory Patrick Moran POETRY 80 Anaranjado John Alba Cutler 165 “Why Are Your Kids Late to School Today?” Lisa Martin BOOK REVIEWS 166 Saints at Devil’s Gate: Landscapes along the Mormon Trail by Laura Allred Hurtado and Bryon C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Function of the Seventies in LDS Church History
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1960 The Role and Function of the Seventies in LDS Church History James N. Baumgarten Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Baumgarten, James N., "The Role and Function of the Seventies in LDS Church History" (1960). Theses and Dissertations. 4513. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4513 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 3 e F tebeebTHB ROLEROLB ardaindANDAIRD FUNCTION OF tebeebTHB SEVKMTIBS IN LJSlasLDS chweceweCHMECHURCH HISTORYWIRY A thesis presentedsenteddented to the dedepartmentA nt of history brigham youngyouyom university in partial ftlfillmeutrulfilliaent of the requirements for the degree master of arts by jalejamsjamejames N baumgartenbelbexbaxaartgart9arten august 1960 TABLE CFOF CcontentsCOBTEHTS part I1 introductionductionreductionroductionro and theology chapter bagragpag ieI1 introduction explanationN ionlon of priesthood and revrevelationlation Sutsukstatementement of problem position of the writer dedelimitationitationcitation of thesis method of procedure and sources II11 church doctrine on the seventies 8 ancient origins the revelation
    [Show full text]
  • United Methodist Bishops Page 17 Historical Statement Page 25 Methodism in Northern Europe & Eurasia Page 37
    THE NORTHERN EUROPE & EURASIA BOOK of DISCIPLINE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 2009 Copyright © 2009 The United Methodist Church in Northern Europe & Eurasia. All rights reserved. United Methodist churches and other official United Methodist bodies may reproduce up to 1,000 words from this publication, provided the following notice appears with the excerpted material: “From The Northern Europe & Eurasia Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church—2009. Copyright © 2009 by The United Method- ist Church in Northern Europe & Eurasia. Used by permission.” Requests for quotations that exceed 1,000 words should be addressed to the Bishop’s Office, Copenhagen. Scripture quotations, unless otherwise noted, are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA. Used by permission. Name of the original edition: “The Book of Discipline of The United Methodist Church 2008”. Copyright © 2008 by The United Methodist Publishing House Adapted by the 2009 Northern Europe & Eurasia Central Conference in Strandby, Denmark. An asterisc (*) indicates an adaption in the paragraph or subparagraph made by the central conference. ISBN 82-8100-005-8 2 PREFACE TO THE NORTHERN EUROPE & EURASIA EDITION There is an ongoing conversation in our church internationally about the bound- aries for the adaptations of the Book of Discipline, which a central conference can make (See ¶ 543.7), and what principles it has to follow when editing the Ameri- can text (See ¶ 543.16). The Northern Europe and Eurasia Central Conference 2009 adopted the following principles. The examples show how they have been implemented in this edition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Journal
    Journal of the Forty-Third Session Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference The United Methodist Church held at the Salem Conference Center Salem, Oregon June 16-19, 2011 Bishop Robert T. Hoshibata, Presiding Laura Jaquith Bartlett, Secretary Volume II Table Of Contents Conference Staff ...........................................................................................................................4 Boards and Agencies .....................................................................................................................9 Conference Policies .....................................................................................................................31 Structure of the Annual Conference .............................................................................................51 Strategic Direction for the Annual Conference ............................................................................52 Clergy Directory ..........................................................................................................................53 Laity Directory .............................................................................................................................79 Institutions Directory ...................................................................................................................98 Appointment List ........................................................................................................................108 Salary Schedules .........................................................................................................................118
    [Show full text]
  • Methodists in Search of Unity Amidst Division
    Methodists in Search of Unity amidst Division: Considering the Values and Costs of Unity and Separation in the Face of Two Moral Crises: Slavery and Sexual Orientation [Presented at the Oxford Institute for Methodist Studies, August 2007.] By Bruce W. Robbins [Author’s Note: This paper will undergo revision in the fall of 2007. The revised copy will be posted on the Oxford Institute website when completed.] Introduction For the last decade and more, The United Methodist Church (UMC) has been facing conflict caused by contrasting views of a moral issue: whether or not persons who are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender (LGBT)1 should be welcomed as others into the UMC as lay members or as clergy. The debate has been distressing to all in the church , for many because it has prevented debate and action on many of the other issues associated with Christian ministry. During the last four years, the debate has evolved into intense discussion of ecclesiological issues and has led some members to question the value of maintaining unity within the UMC, or to wonder whether it would be better and, perhaps, more faithful to separate into different institutional structures. Nearly two centuries ago, the church faced another major divide over a moral issue- slavery. Alongside many differences between the two historical contexts, there are also similarities that church members faced, similarities that can be seen through the debates and actions within the annual and general conferences of the church. The slavery debates in the 1830s and 40s culminated in several splits in Methodism, the largest of which, in 1844, saw no reunion until ninety-five years had passed.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening the Heavens: Seventy-Six Accounts of Joseph Smith's
    Desk in the room of the restored John Johnson home, Hiram, Ohio, in which “The Vision,” now known as Doctrine and Covenants 76, was received con- currently by Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon. Courtesy John W. Welch. Seventy-six Accounts of Joseph Smith’s Visionary Experiences Alexander L. Baugh oseph Smith the seer ushered in the dispensation of the fullness of Jtimes. His role was known and prophesied of anciently. The Lord promised Joseph of Egypt that in the last days a “choice seer” would come through his lineage and would bring his seed to a knowledge of the covenants made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (2 Ne. 3:7; jst Gen. 50:27–28). “That seer will the Lord bless,” Joseph prophesied, specifi- cally indicating that “his name shall be called after me” (2 Ne. 3:14–15; see also jst Gen. 50:33). Significantly, in the revelation received dur- ing the organizational meeting of the Church on April 6, 1830, the first title given to the first elder was that of seer: “Behold, there shall be a record kept . and in it thou [Joseph Smith] shalt be called a seer, a translator, a prophet, an apostle of Jesus Christ” (D&C 21:1). In the Book of Mormon, Ammon defined a seer as one who pos- sessed “a gift from God” to translate ancient records (Mosiah 8:13; see also 28:11–16). However, the seeric gift is not limited to translation, hence Ammon’s additional statement that “a seer is a revelator and a prophet also; and a gift which is greater can no man have” (Mosiah 8:16).
    [Show full text]