DOCSLIB.ORG

August 6, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
August 6, 2014 1 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD TRANSCRIPT SUMMER 2014 PUBLIC MEETING Wednesday August 6, 2014 Marriott Residence Inn Taylor Crossing East and West Rooms 635 West Broadway Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 2 NWTRB BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Rodney C. Ewing, Ph.D., Chairman, NWTRB Jean Bahr, Ph.D. Steven M. Becker, Ph.D. Sue B. Clark, Ph.D. Gerald S. Frankel, Sc.D. Linda K. Nozick, Ph.D. Kenneth Lee Peddicord, Ph.D. Paul J. Turinsky, Ph.D. Mary Lou Zoback, Ph.D. NWTRB EXECUTIVE STAFF Nigel Mote, Executive Director Debra L. Dickson, Director of Administration NWTRB SENIOR PROFESSIONAL STAFF Gene W. Rowe Bret W. Leslie Roberto T. Pabalan Daniel S. Metlay Daniel G. Ogg Karyn D. Severson, Director, External Affairs NWTRB ADMINISTRATION STAFF Linda Coultry, Program Management Analyst NWTRB INTERN Elaina R. Anderson 3 I N D E X PAGE NO. Call to Order and Introductory Statement Rodney C. Ewing, Ph.D. Chairman U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board . 6 Overview of DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Gary DeLeon Director Office of Nuclear Materials Disposition, Office of Environmental Management, U.S. Department of Energy . 12 Questions/Discussion. 29 Status of Work Done to Date on Multi-Canister Overpacks (MCOs) and Standard Canisters Multi-Canister Overpack Roger McCormack CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company. 45 Status of Work Done to Date on Standard Canisters and Multi-Canister Overpacks Brett Carlsen Idaho National Laboratory . 54 Questions/Discussion. 70 Fuel Drying Activities at Hanford and Idaho Fuel Drying Activities by the Environmental Management Program at Idaho National Laboratory Barbara Beller Federal Project Director Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. 78 Hanford Multi-Canister Overpack Drying Roger McCormack CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company. 87 Questions/Discussion. 95 4 I N D E X (Continued) PAGE NO. FY14 DOE R&D in Support of the High Burnup Dry Storage Cask R&D Project William Boyle Director Office of Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition Research and Development, Office of Nuclear Energy, Department of Energy. 101 Questions/Discussion. 126 Public Comments . 140 Lunch . 147 Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Waste at Idaho National Laboratory Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory - Office of Environmental Management Barbara Beller Federal Project Director Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. 148 HLW Management at the INL Mark Shaw General Engineer Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. 160 Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory - Office of Nuclear Energy Lance Lacroix Director Facility & Infrastructure Support Division Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. 164 Questions/Discussion. 174 Management of Aging Storage Facilities and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management of Aging Storage Facilities and Spent Nuclear Fuel Barbara Beller Federal Project Director Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. 195 5 I N D E X (Continued) PAGE NO. Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Facility Aging Roger McCormack CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company. 211 Questions/Discussion. 213 Examination and Transportation of Damaged Spent Nuclear Fuel Barbara Beller Federal Project Director Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office . 229 Questions/Discussion. 236 Public Comments . 245 Adjourn Public Meeting. 253 6 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 8:00 a.m. 3 EWING: So good morning. Welcome to the meeting of the 4 Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board in Idaho Falls. We are 5 pleased to be back. Looking on our record of visits, this is 6 our third time in four years, so clearly Idaho is an 7 important part of the Board’s efforts and interest. 8 Today we’ll be addressing a number of issues 9 related to the storage, transport, and disposal of DOE spent 10 nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. We note that 11 many of the issues discussed are also relevant to the fate of 12 spent fuel generated by commercial nuclear power plants. The 13 presentations and discussion today are designed to inform the 14 Board as we complete a report on the management of DOE spent 15 nuclear fuel. 16 I’ll go into more detail about the meeting agenda 17 in just a few moments, but first, for those of you who may be 18 unfamiliar with the Board and its mission, let me say a few 19 words about the Board. 20 The Board is an independent federal agency in the 21 Executive Branch. We are not part of the DOE or any other 22 federal agency. The Board was created by the 1987 amendments 23 to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, and we are charged with 24 providing an independent evaluation of the technical and 25 scientific validity of DOE activities related to implementing 7 1 the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. These DOE activities that we 2 review include transporting, packaging, and disposing of 3 spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste. Now, I want to 4 emphasize that our charge and interest are specifically 5 focused on spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste. The 6 Board reports its findings and recommendations to Congress 7 and to the Secretary of Energy. 8 The eleven Board members are appointed by the 9 President from a list of nominees submitted by the National 10 Academy of Sciences. The Board members serve as part-time 11 employees, special federal employees, but we are fortunate in 12 that we have a very talented full-time staff, and the full- 13 time staff are located at the table just to your right. 14 Normally I go through and do individual 15 introductions, but today I think I’ll forgo that process 16 simply to save time and because we have a hand-out at the 17 back of the room, which gives you a little more detail on the 18 charge of the Board; and on the back are pictures of the 19 Board members with a description of our affiliations and 20 disciplinary interests. One thing to note is that this Board 21 has a wide range of scientific and engineering disciplines 22 represented, and I think this is one of the strengths of the 23 Board in that we’re able to address issues from many 24 different scientific and technical perspectives. 25 I want to encourage you to engage Board members and 8 1 staff members during breaks and after the meeting. We value 2 your comments and the interactions that we have with 3 technical staff from DOE, but also from the informed and 4 concerned public. 5 So that saves us a little bit of time. 6 Now let me say a few words about today’s agenda, 7 and the first thing to say is, we’ve scheduled two 8 opportunities for public comment. The first will be at the 9 end of the morning, and the second will be at the end of the 10 afternoon session. If you’d like to make a public comment, 11 please sign up on the list that’s at the back of the room. 12 In addition, if you don’t want to make a public comment but 13 you have written materials that you would like to submit, 14 we’re happy to receive those; and those written materials 15 will become part of the record of this meeting and will be 16 included in the posting that we do of the transcripts and 17 presentations that are associated with this meeting. So you 18 will be able to enter your thoughts into the record of this 19 meeting. 20 For today’s agenda the first presentation will be 21 made by Gary DeLeon, who is Director of the Office of Nuclear 22 Materials Disposition in DOE’s Office of Environmental 23 Management. Gary will describe activities underway at DOE-EM 24 that are relevant to the management of DOE-owned spent 25 nuclear fuel. Following Gary’s presentation, Brett Carlsen 9 1 from Idaho National Laboratory and Roger McCormack of CH2M 2 will describe the status of DOE’s work on standard canisters 3 and multi-canister overpacks. The Board looks forward to 4 these presentations, which will address issues such as how 5 the standard canisters and multi-canister overpacks will be 6 transported, whether they can be used in a variety of rock 7 types for geologic disposal, and the status of their 8 certification. 9 After a short break, Barbara Beller of the Idaho 10 Operations Office and Roger McCormack will discuss fuel- 11 drying activities at both Hanford and INL. Drying the fuel 12 is necessary for preparing it for transport and disposal 13 off site. 14 Following this discussion, Bill Boyle, the Director 15 of DOE’s NE Office of Used Fuel Disposition, will describe 16 research in support of DOE’s High Burnup Dry Cask Storage 17 Research and Development Project. The Board is particularly 18 interested in learning how this work can be applied to issues 19 related to commercially-generated spent nuclear fuel. 20 We’ve set aside 20 minutes at the end of Bill’s 21 presentation for our first public comment session. 22 After lunch Barbara Beller, Joel Case, and Lance 23 Lacroix, all of the Idaho Operations Office, will kick off 24 our afternoon session with a discussion of the management of 25 spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at INL. 10 1 Barbara and Lance will walk us through activities related to 2 the management of sodium-bonded spent nuclear fuel and 3 aluminum-clad spent nuclear fuel at the site. 4 Following this discussion, Barbara and Roger will 5 discuss how aging storage facilities and spent fuel are being 6 managed across the DOE complex.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Decommissioning of Research Reactors in Finland
    Decommissioning of research reactors in Finland SAMIRA workshop 13th November 2019 Linda Kumpula FiR 1 Research reactor Helsinki The reactor building in Otaniemi, Finland. Source: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Espoo, Otaniemi VTT’s FiR 1 research reactor (on the left) and the research reactor’s pool and core (on the right). Source: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland FiR 1, Triga Mark II, 250 kW The opening day in 1962 (on the left) and the last day 30.6.2015 (up). Source: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Footer VTT is responsible for the waste management – cooperation needed • According to Finnish legislation, VTT is responsible for the management of the spent fuel and the radioactive waste of the research reactor. • The government has the secondary responsibility. • Low and intermediate level waste produced in the research reactor must be handled, stored and disposed of in Finland. • Spent fuel of the research reactor can be handled, stored and disposed of abroad. • VTT have no disposal facilities of their own and no centralised disposal facilities exist in Finland. Footer Waste management plans were not ready during operation • VTT performed EIA process in 2013 – 2015. • VTT applied licence from the Finnish Government for decommissioning and dismantling in 2017. • VTT is currently negotiating with national companies and also internationally for waste management. • There is a need of national co-operation before the licence can be granted. • The cost estimates of the decommissioning depends on plans and commercial agreements and are still evolving. Footer Waste inventories are well known • The fuel is a homogenous mixture of low-enrichment (less than 20%) uranium and zirconium hydride.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Proceedings Series
    Spine for 280 pages: 14,48 mm Management and Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Research Reactor Spent Storage of Management and Proceedings Series Management and Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Proceedings of a Technical Meeting held in Thurso, United Kingdom, 19–22 October 2009 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–138210–8 ISSN 0074–1884 MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE OF RESEARCH REACTOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GUATEMALA PANAMA ALBANIA HAITI PAPUA NEW GUINEA ALGERIA HOLY SEE PARAGUAY ANGOLA HONDURAS PERU ARGENTINA HUNGARY PHILIPPINES ARMENIA ICELAND POLAND AUSTRALIA INDIA PORTUGAL AUSTRIA INDONESIA AZERBAIJAN IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF QATAR BAHRAIN IRAQ REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BANGLADESH IRELAND ROMANIA BELARUS ISRAEL RUSSIAN FEDERATION BELGIUM ITALY Rwanda BELIZE JAMAICA SAUDI ARABIA BENIN JAPAN SENEGAL BOLIVIA JORDAN SERBIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA KAZAKHSTAN SEYCHELLES BOTSWANA KENYA SIERRA LEONE BRAZIL KOREA, REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA KUWAIT SINGAPORE BURKINA FASO KYRGYZSTAN SLOVAKIA BURUNDI LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC SLOVENIA CAMBODIA REPUBLIC SOUTH AFRICA CAMEROON LATVIA SPAIN CANADA LEBANON SRI LANKA CENTRAL AFRICAN LESOTHO SUDAN REPUBLIC LIBERIA SWAZILAND CHAD LIBYA SWEDEN CHILE LIECHTENSTEIN SWITZERLAND CHINA LITHUANIA COLOMBIA LUXEMBOURG SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC CONGO MADAGASCAR TAJIKISTAN COSTA RICA MALAWI THAILAND CÔTE D’IVOIRE MALAYSIA THE FORMER YUGOSLAV CROATIA MALI REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA CUBA MALTA TOGO CYPRUS MARSHALL
    [Show full text]
  • INEEL BNCT Research Program Annual Report, CY-2000
    INEEL/EXT-01-00204 INEEL BNCT Research Program Annual Report, CY-2000 (Parts 1 and 2) March 2001 Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC INEEL/EXT-01-00204 INEEL BNCT Research Program Annual Report, CY-2000 Part 1 Edited by J. R. Venhuizen Published March 2001 Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the US Department of Energy Office of Science Under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-99ID13727 ABSTRACT This report is a summary of the activities conducted in conjunction with the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) Research Program for calendar year 2000. Applications of supportive research and development, as well as technology deployment in the fields of chemistry, radiation physics and dosimetry, neutron source design and demonstration, and support the Department of Energy’s (DOE) National BNCT Program goals are the goals of this Program. Contributions from the individual contributors about their projects are included, specifically described are the following, chemistry: analysis of biological samples and an infrared blood-boron analyzer, and physics: progress in the patient treatment planning software, measurement of neutron spectra for the Argentina RA-6 reactor, and recalculation of the Finnish research reactor FiR 1 neutron spectra, BNCT accelerator technology, and modification to the research reactor at Washington State University for an epithermal-neutron beam. iii iv CONTENTS ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………..……………………. iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ………………………………………………..…… x INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………….…………………..…. 1 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY W. L. Bauer …………………………………………………………………………….…… 3 DEVELOPMENT OF A BORON ANALYZER BASED UPON INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY W. L Bauer, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme*
    European Research Reactor Conference 2020, Online, 12-15 October 2020 * Conference Programme Monday 12 October 1PM – 2PM CET – Welcome Reception & Time to visit our exhibitors Meet & Greet and see who else is there. This session is an occasion for everybody to test the systems and make sure the connection, camera and microphone work. 2PM – 3PM CET – Poster Session Tuesday 13 October Plenary Sessions - Proliferation Resistance Optimization (1PM – 2.30 PM CET) Keynote speech by Jessica Halse, Assistant Deputy Administrator, U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration Assistant Deputy Administrator Jessica Halse will give a welcome from the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration. She will highlight the ways in which her team is rising to the challenges of COVID-19, present new initiatives in Proliferation Resistance, and the ways NNSA's Material Management and Minimization office is adapting to be a leader in nuclear nonproliferation for years to come. Interview Brian Boyer, IAEA (tbc) INPRO Methodology Focusing on Proliferation Resistance as an Issue for the Lifecycle and Use of Research Reactors International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) looks at six areas of assessment. Economics area looks at competitiveness against alternatives available * As the organization of the conference is ongoing, the programme could be subject to further modifications European Research Reactor Conference 2020, Online, 12-15 October 2020 (in the country). Waste management looks at managing waste so that humans and environment are protected and undue burdens on future generations are avoided. Infrastructure looks adequate infrastructure and effort to create / maintain it. Environment looks at the impact of stressors must stay within performance envelope of current NES.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Reactor Fir 1
    Current utilization and long term strategy of the Finnish TRIGA research reactor FiR 1 Iiro Auterinen Seppo Salmenhaara VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Otaniemi, Espoo, Finland 4th WORLD TRIGA USERS CONFERENCE LYON, 07.9.-10.9.2008 VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND Research reactor (FiR 1, Triga Mark II, 250 kW) • Epithermal neutron irradiation facility for Neutron Capture Therapy • epithermal neutron flux 1.1 109 /cm2s is created by the FLUENTAL™ neutron moderator • In core irradiations for isotope production, activation analysis and irradiation testing (thermal 1013 n/cm2/s, fast 1013 n/cm2/s) • Main isotopes for tracer studies produced in the reactor are 82Br, 24Na and 140La • Operation license is currently valid till end of 2011. Continuation is foreseen at least till 2016. • Waste management of FiR 1 • Spent fuel either (1) returned to the USA (option open until 2016) or (2) disposed in the Olkiluoto spent fuel repository for NPPs • The decommissioning wastes disposed in the repository for LILW at the Loviísa NPP • Nuclear Waste Management Fund (5,3 M€) 2 VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND • In the 70’s and 80’s the reactor was operated daily for activation analysis. • Uranium prospecting using delayed neutrons with an automated system. • In the 80´s till mid 90’s samarium-153 was produced for bone cancer treatment and dysprosium-165 for treatment of arthritis. Yearly production of heat by FiR 1 450 400 350 300 250 200 MWh / year 150 100 50 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 year 3 VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating the Inventory of Fir 1 Triga Mk II with Serpent 1.1.16
    Calculating the inventory of FiR 1 Triga Mk II with Serpent 1.1.16 Tuomas Viitanen, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland 2nd International Serpent User Group Meeting , Madrid September 19th, 2012 Outline • Introduction • Shuffle-property of Serpent • Triga model – Geometry – Control rods – Irradiation history • Selected results • Summary Introduction: FiR 1 • Finland’s first nuclear reactor. • Triga Mk-II • Started in 1962 at 100 kW, upgraded to 250 kW in 1967 • Used in BNCT cancer treatments, isotope production and education. • About to be decomissioned (according to current knowledge). Introduction: motivation • The nuclide inventory of FiR 1 Triga Mk-II reactor was needed for safety, security and final disposal analyses. – Average-rod calculations with ORIGEN (+ a representative spectrum from MCNP) – Detailed, rod-wise calculation with Serpent Shuffle-property of Serpent • An undocumented property in Serpent versions 1.1.17 → – Because of a bug, not to be used before version 1.1.18 ! – Still not very thoroughly tested... • Slightly different implementation in Serpent 2 • Makes it possible to interchange two universes in a geometry within a burnup calculation. – Modelling of changes in the fuel loading set power 250000 dep daystep 6.276480 shuffle 8002 2552 dep daystep 113.723520 Geometry model • VTT has three kinds of Triga fuel rods: – Al-clad rods with 8 w-% Uranium – SS-clad rods with 8.5 w-% Uranium – SS-clad rods with 12 w-% Uranium • Each fuel rod was divided into 3 burnup regions in axial direction for calculation. • Geometry of the core, (epi-)thermal column and two out of three beam tubes were modelled in high detail.
    [Show full text]
  • ETUKANSI Application
    VTT – POliCy BRief 1/2016 Decommissioning of VTT’s FiR 1 research reactor licenceETUKANSI application CONTACTS Kotiluoto Petri Research Team Leader Tel. +358 40 573 3867 [email protected] Airila Markus Senior Scientist Tel. +358 40 350 8669 [email protected] VTT TeChNiCAl ReSeARCh CeNTRe Of fiNlANd lTd Vuorimiehentie 3, Espoo P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland Tel. +358 20 722 111 www.vttresearch.com Operating licence application for the REG.no 356/0652/2017 FiR 1 research reactor 20 JUNE 2017 1 (5) For the Government LICENCE APPLICATION: DECOMMISSIONING OF THE FiR 1 RESEARCH REACTOR APPLICANT The applicant is VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd (hereinafter ‘VTT’), domicile Espoo. VTT is the owner and operator of the FiR 1 research reactor of type TRIGA Mk II (hereinafter ‘Reactor’). For more information on VTT, see Appendices 1, 9 and 10, and for information about the location of the Reactor, see Appendix 2. BACKGROUND The State of Finland procured the Reactor from the United States in 1960 for educational and research purposes at the Helsinki University of Technology. The Reactor has been administered by VTT since 1971. The Reactor has been operated since 1962 for research, education, isotope production and the provision of other services. In 1999–2012, the Reactor was also used for radiotherapy. VTT shut down the Reactor permanently on 30 June 2015. On 8 December 2011, the Government issued a decision granting VTT a licence referred to in section 20 of the Nuclear Energy Act (990/1987) to use the Reactor for radiotherapy, research, education and isotope production until the end of 2023 (this is the current licence in force).
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Activation Characterization of the Chemical Elements in Preparation for Nuclear Reactor Decommissioning
    Neutron activation characterization of the chemical elements in preparation for nuclear reactor decommissioning AS Maodi orcid.org/ 0000-0002-4588-8598 Dissertation accepted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Sciences in Engineering Sciences with Nuclear Engineering at the North West University Supervisor: Prof DE Serfontein Co-Supervisor: Mr TJ van Rooyen Graduation: July 2020 Student number: 25905570 PREFACE Firstly, I would like to thank the LORD God for his grace in my life. To my study-leader Prof Dawid Serfontein who was my lecturer for Nuclear Engineering, I would like to thank you for your encouragement and support throughout my study journey. Your work ethic and leadership are so inspiring. I will forever be grateful for the opportunity that you awarded me as a lecture and study leader. To my co-study leader and mentor, Mr Johann van Rooyen. We thank God for you. I would like to thank you for your expertise, assistance, guidance, and patience throughout the process of writing this piece of work. Without your help, this dissertation would not have been possible. I will forever be grateful for your assistance, guidance, encouragement and more than anything, the training, and skills you transferred to me and other students wholeheartedly without holding back. Necsa and the Nuclear industry as a whole are blessed to have a gem like you. To Necsa — the South African Nuclear Energy Corporation — thank you for granting me the opportunity of a lifetime. You paid my fees and granted me generous study leave to attend classes; I will forever be grateful for that.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) at a Nuclear Research Reactor Editor(S): W
    Requirements for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) at a Nuclear Research Reactor Wolfgang A.G. Sauerwein and Ray L. Moss BNCT TEAM The European BNCT Project EUR 23830 EN - 2009 The mission of the JRC-IE is to provide support to Community policies related to both nuclear and non-nuclear energy in order to ensure sustainable, secure and efficient energy production, distribution and use. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy Contact information Address: ESE Unit, Institute for Energy, JRC Petten, 1775 ZG, Petten, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: 0031 224 565126 Fax: 0031 224 565615 http://ie.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC 48624 EUR 23830 EN ISBN 978-92-79-12431-0 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2790/11743 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in The Netherlands 1 Foreword On 11-12 November 2005, a workshop took place in Prague entitled “Requirements for BNCT at a Nuclear Research Reactor”, which was funded by the JRC’s Enlargement and Integration Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Research Centre of Finland, Oteniemi, Finland)
    2.8 EXPERIENCE FROM AND RESEARCH ACTIVITIES AT THE OTANIEMI TRIGA REACTOR, Bruno Bars, (Technical Research Centre of Finland, Oteniemi, Finland) 1. INTRODUCTION The main part of the long range research activities at the FiR-1 reactor in Otaniemi has been presented at previous TRIGA-conferences and will not be dealt with in this paper. In this context we will briefly touch upon the following subjects a few data about reactor operation and the reactor system itself a minicomputer system, which will be used for the collec• ting and handling of operational and radiation protection data and for special purposes. The use of the system for on-line reactivity, source-strength and signal background measurements is described another minicomputer system has been installed for collecting and handling data from various research facilities. This computer is also programmed for on-line reactor noise measurements an automatic uranium analyzer, which is in routine use. 2-68 2. REACTOR OPERATION The yearly reactor operation time has settled to about 1400 hours. So far no spent fuel has been removed from the reactor, but it is to be expected that some fuel elements will have to be replaced within the next few years. Some minor changes have been made into the control console electronics (log-device and calibration device for the recorder, automatic temperature compensation on the water conductivity meter, start-up channel preamplifier) which have led to a better performance of the system. An automatic computer-based data collecting and handling system is installed. The signals from the main transducers will be converted to a standard output range of *f - 20 mA.
    [Show full text]
  • Fir 1 Reactor in Service for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) and Isotope Production
    I. Auterinen and S.E.J. Salmenhaara FiR 1 reactor in service for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) and isotope production I. Auterinen, S.E.J. Salmenhaara VTT Processes, Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Otaniemi, Espoo, Finland [email protected] Abstract. The FiR 1 –reactor, a 250 kW Triga reactor, has been in operation since 1962. The main purpose for the existence of the reactor is now the Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT), but FiR 1 has also an important national role in providing local enterprises and research institutions in the fields of industrial measurements, pharmaceuticals, electronics etc. with isotope production and activation analysis services. In the 1990’s a BNCT treatment facility was build at the FiR 1 reactor located at Technical Research Centre of Finland. A special new neutron moderator material Fluental™(Al+AlF3+Li) developed at VTT ensures the superior quality of the neutron beam. Also the treatment environment is of world top quality after a major renovation of the whole reactor building in 1997. Recently the lithiated polyethylene neutron shielding of the beam aperture was modi- fied to ease the positioning of the patient close to the beam aperture. Increasing the reactor power to 500 kW would allow positioning of the patient further away from the beam aperture. Possibilities to accomplish a safety analysis for this is currently under considerations. Over thirty patients have been treated at FiR 1 since May 1999, when the license for patient treatment was granted to the responsible BNCT treatment organization, Boneca Corporation. Currently three clinical trial protocols for tumours in the brain as well as in the head and neck region are recruiting patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Indexing Terms Used Within Euratom's Nuclear Documentation System
    i« R SOO. (SECOND EDITION, PART ONE) il EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY - EURATOM MMÍ! W" 5i$aiH ni Π' INDEXING TERMS USED WITHIN iî'ê M iι'τ>- ι NUCLEAR DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM p^Éifel^ «idi!' ϋι! ¡ili tfrtMrø i# :WÍ3 m m r«?iir "JHlV ' Directorate "Dissemination of Information" Λ ¡SB Center for Information and Documentation - CID ««3·« 1 ii« ']|»P*|Sp*w ill; Æ ¡TOS! v !ill ms '«! ili» ...1j».F".i::· ¿'ΛΑ5; Make any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect Assume any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method or process disclosed in this document. is on sale at the addresses listed on cover SI^ÍÍIMEÍÍIÍÍSÍII W FB 300,— DM 24,- Lit. 3 740 Fl. 21,60 $ 6,- When ordening, please quote the EUR number and the title, which are indicated on the cover of each report. pifJtiWJiUHt Brussels, December P>X. EUR 500.e EURATOM THESAURUS OF INDEXING TERMS European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) Directorate for Dissemination of Information. Center for Information and Documentation (CID). Brussels, December 1966 - 00 pages - FB S00 A compilation of 19,183 indexing terms in the field of nuclear science and technology, with guidelines for their use in a computer-aided documentation center. Part I contains an alphabetic list of 4,666 keywords and 14,618 specific index• ing terms, with references to the keywords to be used in place oí, or in addition to, the specific terms. Part II is a collection of graphs displaying semantic relationships between indexing terms, which was developed by Euratom to facilitate the use oí the Thesaurus and at the same time ensure consistency oí indexing and quer) formulation.
    [Show full text]