Approved Matthew Arnold As Revealed by His Letters, Poetry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Approved Matthew Arnold As Revealed by His Letters, Poetry Matthew Arnold as revealed by his letters, poetry, and criticism Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Yeager, Mabel Lee, 1910- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 19:02:56 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553248 Matthew Arnold as Revealed by His Letters, Poetry, and Criticism by Mabel Lee Yeager Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate College University of Arizona 1 9 3 5 Approved Major professor Date *• V* • ■ -:v * ; ~ ■ • > «• " ? ' « \ . < * £ < i m m i s Outline Cofi-A. A. Introduction B. The Three Tatthew Arnolds I. Arnold the Letter-' riter 1. Early life, 2. Work and marriage 3. Lectures in America 4. Salient characteristics and views 5. Depreciating attitude toward his contei poreries 6. Later life II. Arnold the Poet 1. Biographical references in his poetry 2. Dominant feeling of despair 3. Views on Christianity 4. Oxford, his period of youth 5. Nature, compared with ordsworth 6. Poetic criticism III. Arnold the Critic 1. Views on the function of criticism 2. Literary insight and critical perception 3. Observation of life and human nature 4. Repetition and use of stock phrases 5. Intellectuality and "superciliousness'’ 6. Satire C. Conclusion— That each of the three types of Arnold's writing reveals entirely different phases of his personality. 9 9 5 C 9 A. Introduction Since 1849, when Matthew Arnold began his writing career at the age of twenty-seven, he has gained fame as an educator, a poet, a critic, and a letter writer. "No writer, probably, ever passed so quickly from unpopularity through fame to comparative n e g l e c t . B u t this apparent neglect has been due to a lack of understanding on the part of present-day readers, who are interested in only one phase of his writing. Arnold's nature was so complex that critics today do not agree in an estimate of him. As an educator he exerted a lasting influence through his work as Inspector of Schools and later as Foreign Commis­ sioner. Arnold Tihitridge, reviewing in 1924 a new edition of Arnold's works, wrote: Matthew Arnold was only a poet or a critic in his spare moments. By profession he was a painstaking school inspector who, in spite of the dally round and trivial task, maintained an extraordinarily lofty con­ cept ion of the dignity of education.1 2 - ■ His poetry will always be enjoyed by certain readers, though it will never have lasting general popularity. _R. H. Stoddard praises him: When he is at his best, his poetry is so good, so 1 *7. C. Brownell, Victorian Prose Masters (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1902), p.149. 2 Arnold Whitridge, "Critic and Poet," The Saturday Review of Literature, 1:45, 1924. —2— luminous, so lovely, so noble* that one cannot but re­ gret there is not more of it.*3 45 6 Herbert Paul states. No poet of modern times, appeals so directly and so exclusively to the cultivated taste of the educated classes According to George Russell, an intimate friend of the Arnold family, he " ' is not, and could never be, a poet of the multitude. He is the delight of scholars, of philosophers, of men who live by silent introspection or quiet communing with nature,b But Robert Moras Lovett, in an article in Forum, avers: His poetry fell flat on' publication, and only gradually came into notice when its author was recognized as a leading public man of the day. .' It is perhaps fortunate that Arnold’s early poems were so generally ignored. This failure was bettor than half success, for it left to the age which had been impressed by his criticism the flattering experience of discovering him as a poet. G. P-. Woodberry,- however, takes an opposing view: The poetry of Arnold. was less widely welcomed than his prose, and made its way very slowly; but it now seems the more important and permanent part.” 3 R. H. Stoddard, "Matthew Arnold the Poet," North ' American, 146:657. 4 Herbert Paul, Matthew Arnold (New York: Macmillan Go., 1903),p.l. 5. George Russell, Matthew Arnold (New York: Chas; Scrib ner’s Sons, 1904), p.3. 6 Robert Morsa Lovett, "Matthew Arnold Today," Forum, 71:666, May, 1924. 7 G.P. woodberry, Makers of Literature (New York: Mac- millan Co., 1901),pp.11-12. -3- The last thirty years of his life were spent In writing 8 criticism. Vi. J. Dawson praises him as ’’an apostle of ideas"; George Russell claims, "If he had never written prose, the world would never have known him as a humorist."® Stanley T. Williams writes that "Arnold was destined to be widely known first of all for his prose.Yet Gordon Ball Gerould, in reviewing Arnold's works, would have us believe "Arnold was a poet who turned into critic, not a scholarly critic who once in a while experimented with verse. His letters, brought out in two volumes by George Rus­ sell in 1896, were not written with a view to possible pub­ lication and were as natural as his conversation. They do not enhance Arnold’s literary reputation, but they are evi­ dence of a singularly happy life and at times a careless, take-life-as-it-coines attitude not revealed in his poetry or criticism. Here we see a home-loving nature, "great forti­ tude under disappointment and losses, remarkable intellectual activity, a keen enjoyment of social life and of foreign travel, strong interest in public events, and an unaffected 8 *V, J . Dawson, Makers of English Poetry (Hew York: Fleming H. Reveil Company, 1906)7 p.336. 9 Russell, op. elt., p. 13. 10 Studies in Victorian Literature (Hew York: E. P. Dutton and Co., c. 1923),p.79. 11 Gordon Hall Gerould> "Matthew Arnold’s Complete works," Bookman, 7:461^ June, 1924. -4- delight at the reception with which his own writings were welcomed by the reading public,- and at the influence and fame which they brought him."'1-2 Everyone who has written on the works of Arnold has a decided preference,which in,few cases allows a fair estimate of him. Because of these varied-and differing views, he is on§ of the most misunderstood men in literature. It is the purpose of this study to present a true picture of Arnold as revealed in all types of his writings. I plan to do this through four topics: First, I shall give a study of his letters, combined with biographical references that will form a background for the discussion. Second, I shall make a study of his poetry, showing the spirit and mood predominating throughout. Third. I shall discuss his criticism, both of litera­ ture and of life, especially bringing out his Hellenist views. Fourth, I shall contrast these three types of writing, summarizing the distinct traits brought out in each. This will be accomplished through a personal evaluation. 12 Sir Joshua Fitch, Thomas and Matthew Arnold (New York: Chas. Scribner's Sons, 1 8 9 8 ) p.iel. I.' ARNOLD TEE LETTER-WRITER Since there is no adequate biography of Arnold, much of the information must be secured by inference from his letters, 1 collected and compiled in 1895 by George Russell. He says in his introduction: "It was Matthew Arnold’s express wish that he might not be made the subject of a Biography. His family, however, felt that a selection from his Letters was not prohibited."1 2 For the most part, his letters were ad­ dressed to his own family, but he had many friends, with whom he carried on a wide correspondence on diverse subjects. They not only reveal the core of his personality and character but also touch on the many interests treated,in his poetry and his prose. Early Life Although his early life is of little importance in this study, a few facts are necessary to form a background for the characterization. He was born at Laleham, Middlesex, on Christmas Eve, 1822, the oldest of nine children of Dr. Thomas 1 George Russell, Letters of Matthew Arnold (New York and London: Macmillan and Co., 1896). Unless otherwise specified, all references to Arnold’s letters will be made by volume and page without mention of the title. 2 Ibid., p.vii. -6- Arnold, the famous Headmaster of Rugby. In his letters Arnold made many references to his father, most of them affectionate and respectful, but leaving a gen­ eral impression that he was not always in sympathy with his father’s views. To his sister, he wrote: I have often thought, since I published this on the.Italian question, about dear papa’s pamphlets, what­ ever talent I have in.this direction I certainly inherit from him, for his pamphleteering talent was one of his very strongest and most pronounced literary sides, if he had been in the way of developing it.3 In the summer of 1861, he paid loving tribute: At this time of year I am aIways particularly reminded of papa, and of what he accomplished in the few years he had. * 4 5 When, in 1855, his mother found and sent him a letter of his father’s, he acknowledged it with an enthusiasm that brings out the character of both men: I ought before this to have thanked you for sending the letter, which is ennobling and refreshing, as every­ thing which proceeds from hir always is, besides the.
Recommended publications
  • The Hero in the Poetry of Matthew
    THE HERO IN THE POETRY OF MATTHEW ARNOLD APPROVED: v - ~ ' /X / TC. let >»- >- r y\ .. / ' tt: (,ic i f Major Frofessor Minor (Professor Director of eparturient, of English Dean of the Gradual.e Sch<x THE HERO IN THE POETRY OF MATTHEW ARNOLD THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Judith Dianne Mackey, B. A, Denton, Texas August, 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I. FROM SCEPTICISM TO THE HEROIC CONCEPT: THE QUEST FOR INTELLECTUAL SECURITY .... 1 II. THE GENESIS OF A NEW SYNTHESIS 6 III. MATTHEW ARNOLD: THE EVOLUTION OF A STOIC 35 IV. MATTHEW ARNOLD: THE STOIC SYNTHESIS 62 V. CONCLUSION 113 BIBLIOGRAPHY 123 in CHAPTER I FROM SCEPTICISM TO THE HEROIC CONCEPT: THE QUEST FOR INTELLECTUAL SECURITY The nineteenth century constitutes, in the history of Western ideas, a period during which old beliefs and methods of thinking were questioned and criticized, and new intel- lectual and emotional responses to life were not yet firmly established. "Old institutions were undermined, new scien- tific discoveries appeared to be destroying the foundations of the Christian faith, as it was then conceived, and doubt -i like a grey mist spread over the whole field of thought." Evolutionary theories and Marxian Socialism shook the faith of the educated, and the Oxford Movement vainly attempted to create a new religious sentiment which could withstand the . 2 stress of these revolutionary ideas. In the wake of the destruction of old beliefs and ideas, violent and varying reactions occurred, primarily among the intelligentsia of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 5: Matthew Arnold: “Literature and Science”
    Unit 5 Matthew Arnold: “Literature and Science” UNIT 5: MATTHEW ARNOLD: “LITERATURE AND SCIENCE” UNIT STRUCTURE 5.1 Learning Objectives 5.2 Introduction 5.3 Matthew Arnold: Life and Works 5.4 Explanation of the Text 5.5 Major Themes 5.6 Style and Language 5.7 Let us Sum up 5.8 Further Reading 5.9 Answers to Check Your Progress 5.10 Model Questions 5.1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this unit you will be able to: • describe the life of Matthew Arnold • explain the context of the essay “Literature and Science” • analyse Arnold’s style and language • examine the contributions of Matthew Arnold as an essayist 5.2 INTRODUCTION This unit will give you an introduction to Matthew Arnold and provide you with a detailed study of the man, his life and his works. A detailed synopsis of the essay has also been included in this unit for a better understanding of the interrelation of literature and science. Over and 60 Alternative English (Block 1) Matthew Arnold: “Literature and Science” Unit 5 above, this unit aims to acquaint you with the themes that form a crucial part of the essay. Besides this, the unit shall also discuss the style and the language used by Arnold. 5.3 MATTHEW ARNOLD: LIFE AND WORKS Matthew Arnold has always been rated very highly among English essayist. It was through his essays that Arnold asserted his greatest influence on literature. His writing on the role of literary criticism in society advance classical ideas and advocate the adoption of universal aesthetic standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Public Intellectual: the Case of Matthew Arnold a Thesis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Saskatchewan's Research Archive Modelling the Public Intellectual: The Case of Matthew Arnold A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of English University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Tenielle Robyn McLeod © Copyright Tenielle Robyn McLeod, December 2007. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis/dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Arts degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis/dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis/dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis/dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis/dissertation. DISCLAIMER Reference in this thesis/dissertation to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the University of Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggestions for Further Reading
    Suggestions for Further Reading A list of the editions of Arnold's works and the secondary sources re­ ferred to most frequently in this volume (along with notes on Nicholas Murray's recent biography and Cecil Y. Lang's first volume of a new edition of Arnold's letters) appears under the heading' Abbreviations of Frequently-Cited Sources' before the Preface. Good general intro­ ductions to Arnold include Fraser Neiman, Matthew Arnold (New York: Twayne, 1968), and Stefan Collini, Arnold (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988). A few additional, important critical studies are listed below. For an annotated bibliography of the most significant contributions to twentieth-century Arnold criticism and scholarship (up to the year 1991), see Clinton Machann, The Essential Matthew Arnold (New York: G. K. Hall, 1993). A reliable survey of criticism through 1972 can be found in David DeLaura's bibliographical essay 'Matthew Arnold' in Victorian Prose: A Guide to Research (New York: Modern Language Association, 1973), pp. 249-320. An annual review of Arnold scholarship and criticism appears in the journal Victorian Poetry. Ruth apRoberts, Arnold and God (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983). Paull F. Baum, Ten Studies in the Poetry of Matthew Arnold (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1958). A. Dwight Culler, Imaginative Reason: The Poetry of Matthew Arnold (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1966). David J. DeLaura, Hebrew and Hellene in Victorian England: Newman, Arnold, Pater (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1969). John Holloway, The Victorian Sage: Studies in Argument (London: Macmillan, 1953), pp. 202-43. William Madden, Matthew Arnold: A Study of the Aesthetic Tempera­ ment in Victorian England (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetic Doctrines of Wordsworth and Arnold: a Comparative Study of Critical Theories in the Nineteenth Century
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1933 The Poetic Doctrines of Wordsworth and Arnold: A Comparative Study of Critical Theories in the Nineteenth Century Honesto F. Farol Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Farol, Honesto F., "The Poetic Doctrines of Wordsworth and Arnold: A Comparative Study of Critical Theories in the Nineteenth Century" (1933). Master's Theses. 167. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/167 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1933 Honesto F. Farol Ill c_: _,, ---------------------------~-'·-=-, THE FOETIC DOCTRINES OF WORDSWORTH AND ARNOLD: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CRITICAL THEORIES IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BY HONESTO F. FAROL A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Loyola University 1933 pu VITA HONESTO F. FAROL Born in Candon, !locos Sur, Philippine Islands, April 3, 1901. Graduated from Vigan High School, Vigan, !locos Sur, Philippine Islands, March, 1921. B. s., Lewis Institute, Chicago, Illinois, June, 1932. p: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Arnold (1822-88)
    Matthew Arnold (1822-88) Life and character.- Matthew Arnold was born at Laleham, Middlesex, on December 24, and was educated at Winchester, Rugby, and Oxford. In 1847 he became private secretary to Lord Lansdowne, and in 1851 was appointed to an inspectorship of schools, which he held till 1885. From 1857 to 1867 he was professor of poetry at Oxford. He lectured in America in 1883 and 1886. He died on April 15, 1888. Arnold long figured in popular imagination as a superior person, a dilettante apostle of culture, and an elegant and spurious Jeremiah., who was not to be taken too seriously. Certain mannierisms of his prose writings were, in part at least, responsible for this legendary perversion of his personality. He was in fact an earnest, sincere, hard-working, and thoroughly sympathetic man. Works.- His publications in verse are: Poetry.- The Strayed Reveller (1849) Empedocles on Etna (1852) Poems, second series (1855) Merope (1858) New Poems (1867) Prose.- Theoretical: Essays in Criticism (1855 and 1888) Mixed Essays (1879) Discourses in America (1885) On Translating Homer (1861-2) Celtic Literature (1867) Political: English and Italian Question (1859) Culture and Anarchy (1869) Friendship’s Garland (1871) Irish Essays (1882) Religious: Literature and Dogma (1873) St. Paul and Protestantism (1870) God and the Bible (1875) Last Essays on Church and Religion (1877). Views.- In his general conception of poetry the ethical element was in the ascendant. For a poet to be great it is necessary that he shall handle sound subject matter in a spirit of high seriousness. Poetry is “a criticism of life under the conditions fixed for such criticism by the laws of poetic truth and poetic beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Arnold 1 Matthew Arnold
    Matthew Arnold 1 Matthew Arnold Matthew Arnold Matthew Arnold, by Elliott & Fry, circa 1883. Born 24 December 1822 Laleham, Middlesex, England Died 15 April 1888 (aged 65) Liverpool, England Occupation Her Majesty's Inspector of Schools Nationality British Period Victorian Genres Poetry; Literary, Social and Religious Criticism Notable work(s) "Dover Beach", "The Scholar-Gipsy", "Thyrsis", Culture and Anarchy, Literature and Dogma Spouse(s) Frances Lucy Children Thomas Trevenen Richard Lucy Eleanore Basil Matthew Arnold (24 December 1822 – 15 April 1888) was a British poet and cultural critic who worked as an inspector of schools. He was the son of Thomas Arnold, the famed headmaster of Rugby School, and brother to both Tom Arnold, literary professor, and William Delafield Arnold, novelist and colonial administrator. Matthew Arnold has been characterized as a sage writer, a type of writer who chastises Family tree and instructs the reader on contemporary social issues.[1] Matthew Arnold 2 Early years The Reverend John Keble, who would become one of the leaders of the Oxford Movement, stood as godfather to Matthew. "Thomas Arnold admired Keble's 'hymns' in The Christian Year, only reversing himself with exasperation when this old friend became a Romeward-tending 'High Church' reactionary in the 1830s."[2] In 1828, Arnold's father was appointed Headmaster of Rugby School and his young family took up residence, that year, in the Headmaster's house. In 1831, Arnold was tutored by his uncle, the Reverend John Buckland, at Laleham, Middlesex. In 1834, the Arnolds occupied a holiday home, Fox How, in the Lake District. William Wordsworth was a neighbour and close friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit-2 Matthew Arnold 'Dover Beach'; 'To Marguerite: Continued'
    Unit-2 Matthew Arnold ‘Dover Beach’; ‘To Marguerite: Continued’ Structure: 2.2.0. Introduction 2.2.1. Matthew Arnold: Biography 2.2.2. Features of Arnold’s Poetry 2.2.3. Text of ‘Dover Beach’ 2.2.3. a. Context 2.2.3. b. Summary 2.2.3. c. Analysis 2.2.4. Text of ‘To Marguerite: Continued’ 2.2.4. a. Context 2.2.4. b. Summary 2.2.4. c. Analysis 2.2.5. Summing Up 2.2.6. Comprehension Exercises 2.2.7. Suggested Reading 2.2.0. Introduction You have already read in the earlier module on Victorian society and politics that in Victorian England there was peace and prosperity on the one hand and poverty, doubt and anxiety on the other. Culturally, this was reflected in some ways in the simultaneous increase in the taste for luxury, decadence and a revival in the taste for both Baroque and Gothic architecture and an increase in the awareness of poverty and other social evils and a feeling of isolation and loneliness. The literature of the period mirrored this stark contrast through the simultaneous existence of the literature of writers like the Pre-Raphaelities and the writings of Charles Dickens and Matthew Arnold. However, it may be said of Tennyson and Browning that they had, in some 88 ways, incorporated both tendencies in their work. In the writings of the Victorians, therefore, one encounters, simultaneously, the religiosity of The Blessed Damozel, the doubts against religion raised in Fra Lippo Lippi, the soul-searchings of In Memoriam as well as the attempt to restore lost faith in Dover Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Moon Lies Fair”: the Poetry of Matthew Arnold
    Rice University "The Moon Lies Fair": The Poetry of Matthew Arnold Author(s): Herbert R. Coursen, Jr. and Matthew Arnold Source: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, Vol. 4, No. 4, Nineteenth Century (Autumn, 1964), pp. 569-581 Published by: Rice University Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/449510 Accessed: 30-12-2015 10:41 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Johns Hopkins University Press and Rice University are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 194.27.18.18 on Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:34 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions "The Moon Lies Fair":The Poetry of MatthewArnold HERBERT R. C 0 U R SE N, J R. Raised are the dripping oars, Silent the boat! The lake, Lovely and soft as a dream, Swims in the sheen of the moon. The mountains stand at its head Clear in the pure June-night, But the valleys are flooded with haze. Rydal and Fairfield are there; In the shadow Wordsworth lies dead.
    [Show full text]
  • In Victorian Desert
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 4 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy July 2015 Pioneers of “Dawnism” in Victorian Desert Bahee Hadaegh Shiraz University [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p340 Abstract Arnold more than any other Victorian writer sums up for the reader the most typical qualities of the age. He shows the movement of thought in man in relation to the age. Arnold depicts the intellectual, cultural, religious and literary confusion of the age and calls it the “darkling plain. Throughout Arnold’s poetic career he tries to connect internal integrity with the social lives of men who are alone in an alien world. “The Scholar Gipsy” brings a sense of contemplation back to the frozen minds of the Victorian Utilitarianism. Although the images of hopes in “The Scholar Gipsy” done by the visionary quest and the Tyrian Trader put an end to the life-long doubt-stricken Victorian men, they are only the demonstrations without any palpable, real application in the wasteland of the age. Sohrab in Sohrab and Rustum is a servant of God who struggles to enter the territory of his father. It is his own lost origin to which he enters and consequently finds peace and joins the ‘All.’ Here, Sohrab is the son who is under the ageis of Thomas Arnold, the father, a triumphant practical spirit guiding the inhabitants of the darkness to the light. If “The Scholar Gipsy” is the renovation of man’s spirit from the uncertainty through the suggestion of a vision, and a ‘beacon of hope.’ Sohrab and Rustum is Arnold’s achieved vision and the real capture of the genuine self through the open involvement of the committed traveller in the way of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Anarchy
    ’ CULTURE AND ANARCHY M A was born at Laleham-on-Thames on Christmas Eve , the eldest son and second of the nine surviving children of the Revd Thomas Arnold and Mary Penrose Arnold. He was educated at Winchester; at Rugby School, where his father was headmaster; and at Oxford. In he was elected to a fellowship at Oriel College, Oxford, and in – spent an extended period of time in France. He started to publish his poetry in the late s and early s. In he became personal secretary to Lord Lansdowne, a leading Whig politician, through whose influence he was appointed inspector of schools in , which gave him a secure enough position to marry Frances Lucy Wightman. It was a close marriage, and they had six children (three of whom died young), to whom Arnold was devoted. Most of Arnold’s poetry was written in the first half of his life, on themes of love, faith and doubt, stoicism and aesthetic pleasure. From the mid-s his role as a critic came into prominence. Whilst continuing his job as a school inspector, he published reports on education on the Continent, and began to write regularly for the periodical press. He wrote about the place of literature––and of criticism––in modern society, especially drawing on classical and European writers to highlight qualities which he felt were lacking in contemporary English culture. As Professor of Poetry at Oxford (–) he also delivered four lectures on the study of Celtic literature. His practical and theoretical work on education led him to a wider social criticism, which bore fruit in Culture and Anarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • SOHRAB and RUSTUM and OTHER POEMS Page 1 of 132
    MATTHEW ARNOLD'S SOHRAB AND RUSTUM AND OTHER POEMS Page 1 of 132 [p.2][p.10][p.12][p.17][p.21][p.23][p.25][p.28][p.30][p.32][p.35][p.37][p.39][p.45][p.46][p.47][p.48][p.51][[p.62][p.66][p.70][p.72][p.74][p.77][p.79][p.80][p.87][p.90][p.91][p.95][p.98][p.104][p.106][p.111][p.113][p.123][p.125][p.131][p.ix][p.xii][p.xiii][p.xiv][p.xv][p.xvi][p.xvii][p.xviii][p.xix][p.xx][p.xxi][p.xxii][p.xxiii][p.xxiv][p.xxv][p.xxvi][p.xxvii][p.xxviii][p.xxix][p.xxx][p.xxxi][p.xxxiii][p.xxxiv][p.xxxv][p.xxxvi][p.xxxvii][p.xxxviii][p.xxxix][p.xl][p.55][p.63][p.99][p.116][p.119][p.149][p.150][p.151][p.152][p.153][p.154][p.155][p.156][p.157][p.158][p.159][p.160][p.161][p.162][p.163][p.164][p.165][p.166][p.167][p.168][p.169][p.170][p.171][p.172][p.173][p.174][p.175][p.176][p.177][p.178][p.179][p.180][p.181][p.182][p.183][p.184][p.185][p.186][p.187][p.188][p.189][p.190][p.191][p.192][p.193][p.194][p.195][p.196][p.197][p.198][p.199][p.200][p.201][p.202][p.203][p.204][p.205][p.206][p.207][p.208][p.209][p.210][p.211][p.213]p.xxxii]p.53] The Project Gutenberg EBook of Matthew Arnold's Sohrab and Rustum and Other Poems, by Matthew Arnold [p.217] This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.
    [Show full text]