DOCSLIB.ORG

Toktogul Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project: Environmental Monitoring Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toktogul Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project: Environmental Monitoring Report Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-annual report September 2020 L3212/G0419-KGZ: Toktogul Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project Prepared by the Open Joint Stock Company Electric Power Plants, with the assistance of the Project Implementation Consultant Tractebel Engineering-Coyne EtBellier (France) in association with Endustriel Elektrik Maden LLC (Kyrgyz Republic). This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Toktogul Hydropower Plant Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project Reporting period: January – June 2020 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Preamble.................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Headline Information ................................................................................................... 6 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT ACTIVITIES .............................................. 10 2.1. Project Description.................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Project Contracts and Management ........................................................................... 10 2.3. Project Activities during current reporting period......................................................... 13 2.4. Description of Any Changes to Project Design ........................................................... 16 2.5. Description of Any Changes to Agreed Construction methods .................................... 16 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARD ACTIVITIES ............................................................ 17 3.1. General Description of Environmental Safeguard Activities ......................................... 17 3.2. Site Audits ................................................................................................................ 17 3.3. Issues Tracking (Based on Non-Conformance Notices) .............................................. 18 3.4. Trends ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.5. Unanticipated Environmental Impacts or Risks ........................................................... 18 3.6. Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................................................................ 18 4. RESULTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ........................................................ 19 4.1. Overview of Monitoring Conducted during Current Period........................................... 19 4.2. Trends ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.3. Summary of Monitoring Outcomes............................................................................. 19 4.4. Material Resources Utilisation ................................................................................... 20 4.4.1. Current Period ........................................................................................................ 20 4.4.2. Cumulative Resource Utilisation .............................................................................. 20 4.5. Waste Management .................................................................................................. 20 4.5.1. Current Period ........................................................................................................ 20 4.5.2. Cumulative Waste Generation ................................................................................. 21 4.6. Health and Safety............................................................................................... 21 4.6.1. Community Health and Safety ................................................................................. 21 4.6.2. Worker Safety and Health ....................................................................................... 21 4.7. Training ............................................................................................................. 24 5. FUNCTIONING OF THE SSEMP ........................................................................ 25 5.1. SSEMP Review.................................................................................................. 25 6. GOOD PRACTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT................................ 26 6.1. Good Practice .................................................................................................... 26 6.2. Opportunities for Improvement ............................................................................ 26 7. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. 26 2 Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Toktogul Hydropower Plant Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project Reporting period: January – June 2020 7.1. Summary ........................................................................................................... 26 7.2. Recommendations ............................................................................................. 27 ANNEXES ...................................................................................................................... 31 LIST OF ANNEXES Annex 1. Approval of the SAEPF on IEE developed for Phase 2Project .................................. 31 Annex 2. The Initial list of main documents on Environmental Safeguard Toktogul HPP Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project as of June 2020 ..................................................................... 37 Annex 3. Photo records of the works for Package 1 Phase 2 Project at Toktogul HPP during the reporting period .................................................................................................................... 39 Annex 4. Photo records of the works for Package 2 Phase 2 Project at Toktogul HPP during the reporting period .................................................................................................................... 41 Annex 5. Lists of EHS trainings of Construction Contractor of Package 2 Phase 2 Project ....... 42 LIST OF TABLES: Table 1. Project Contracts under implementation of Toktogul HPP Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project ................................................................................................................................. 12 Table 2. Activities implemented at site during reporting period for Package 2 of Phase 2 Project ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Table 3. Activities implemented at site during reporting period for Package 1 of Phase 2 Project ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Table 4. Guidelines on Preventive Measures at the Workplace .............................................. 28 LIST OF SCHEMES: Scheme 1.Environmental management of the Rehabilitation of Toktogul HPP Phase 2 Project as of June 2020.................................................................................................................... 13 LIST OF FIGURES: Figure 1: Toktogul hydropower plant dam .............................................................................. 10 Figure 2: Compliance Books in the field offices of the Construction Contractors and are easily accessible ............................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 3: ACM waste bags taken out (Status in March 2020) ................................................. 20 Figure 4: ACM waste removal (Status in March 2020) ............................................................ 20 Figure 5: Active screening - temperature control implemented by the Employer (Status in May 2020) ................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 6: Equipment locking procedure ½ (Status in June 2020) ............................................ 22 Figure 7: Equipment locking procedure 2/2 (Status in June 2020) .......................................... 23 Figure 8: Internal training on safety and health (Status in May 2020) ...................................... 24 Figure 9. Re-installation of bolts joined on Draft tube gate (Status in March 2020)................... 39 Figure 10. Installation of bolts joined and clamp plates on Maintenance Intake gates (Status in March 2020)......................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 11. Checking of Draft tube gate – A (Status in March 2020) ......................................... 39 Figure 12. Checking of diving equipment (Status in February 2020) ....................................... 39 Figure 13. Checking of leakage at draft tube (Status in February 2020) .................................. 39 Figure 14. Unloading of abrasive material (Status
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fundraising Assistant
    Fundraising Assistant Published: 03.05.2021 15:13:04 17.05.2021 23:59:59 The deadline for Deadline: applications has expired Good Neighbors International in Salary: According to the interview results Kyrgyz Republic Work experience: 1 - 2 year Address Location: Bishkek бул. Молодой Гвардии 2/1 Type of involvement: full time Schedule: from 08:30 to 17:30 Phone +996550411655 Web www.goodneighbors.kg Information Common information Common information Branch of Good Neighbors International (GNI) in the Kyrgyz Republic / филиал «Гуд Нейборс Интернешнл в Кыргызской Республике» Good Neighbors is an international humanitarian development NGO founded in Korea in 1991 to make the world a place without hunger, where people live together in harmony. Good Neighbors has attained General consultative status with United Nations Economic and Social council (UN ECOSOC) in 1996. Currently Good Neighbors is working in 192 communities in 40 countries with our focus on inclusive community development approach and child protection. Branch of Good Neighbors International (GNI) works in Kyrgyzstan starting from 2014 in four different regions: Chuy region, Sokuluk district, Nijne-Chuisk local government; Osh region, Osh city, MTU Zhapalak; Jalal-Abad region, Toktogul district, Bel- Aldy local government; Issyk Kul region, Ton district, B.Mambetov local government Good Neighbors International in Kyrgyz Republic is announcing the position of Fundraising Department Assistant Qualification requirements Necessaryㆍ Knowledge Advanced English, Russian and Kyrgyz language skills (written and oral) Computer literacy (MS Office applications, Google products) Adobe products, including InDesign, Photoshop, Illustrator (desirable) Photography experience Drivers license Organizational skills Direct marketing experience: a popular marketing tool. Experience of marketing via social networking websites is also useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of FAO's Contribution to the Kyrgyz Republic. Annexes
    OFFICE OF EVALUATION Country programme evaluation series Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to the KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ANNEXES July 2016 COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION SERIES Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to the Kyrgyz Republic ANNEXES FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF EVALUATION July 2016 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation (OED) This report is available in electronic format at: http://www.fao.org/evaluation The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Jilili Abuduwaili · Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia Water Resources Development and Management
    Water Resources Development and Management Jilili Abuduwaili · Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia Water Resources Development and Management Series editors Asit K. Biswas, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Cecilia Tortajada, Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Editorial Board Dogan Altinbilek, Ankara, Turkey Francisco González-Gómez, Granada, Spain Chennat Gopalakrishnan, Honolulu, USA James Horne, Canberra, Australia David J. Molden, Kathmandu, Nepal Olli Varis, Helsinki, Finland Hao Wang, Beijing, China [email protected] More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7009 [email protected] Jilili Abuduwaili • Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov Hydrology and Limnology of Central Asia 123 [email protected] Jilili Abuduwaili and State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology Faculty of Geography and Environmental and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sciences Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Urumqi Almaty China Kazakhstan and and Research Centre of Ecology and Research Centre of Ecology and Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) Almaty Almaty Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Gulnura Issanova Galymzhan Saparov State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Research Centre of Ecology and Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology Environment of Central Asia (Almaty) and Geography, Chinese Academy of U.U. Uspanov Kazakh Research Institute of Sciences Soil Science and Agrochemistry Urumqi Almaty China Kazakhstan ISSN 1614-810X ISSN 2198-316X (electronic) Water Resources Development and Management ISBN 978-981-13-0928-1 ISBN 978-981-13-0929-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0929-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018943710 © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Administration Memorandum Kyrgyz
    Project Administration Memorandum Project Number: 31197 January 2009 Kyrgyz Republic: Community-Based Infrastructure Services Sector Project (Supplementary Asian Development Fund Grant) Version 0 Last updated by: Cholpon Mambetova Date: 30/03/2009 CONTENTS Overview 1 Annex 1. Project Definition 5 Sec 1.01 Sponsors, Stakeholders and External Agencies 5 Sec 1.02 Impact and Outcomes 5 Sec 1.03 Outputs 5 Annex 2. Project Management 6 Sec 2.01 Project Organization Structure 6 Sec 2.02 Roles and Responsibilities 6 Annex 3. Execution Plan 10 Sec 3.01 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 10 Sec 3.02 Implementation Schedule 11 Sec 3.03 Key Project Activities 11 Annex 4. Safeguards Plan 13 Sec 4.01 Environment 13 Sec 4.02 Involuntary Resettlement 13 Sec 4.03 Indigenous People 13 Sec 4.04 Other Safeguards 13 Annex 5. Financing Plan 14 Sec 5.01 Project Financing and Disbursement Arrangements 14 Sec 5.02 Allocation Table 15 Sec 5.03 Fund Flow 15 Annex 6. Investment (Cost) Plan 17 Sec 6.01 Detailed Cost Estimate 17 Sec 6.02 Annual Operational Plan 17 Sec 6.03 Forecast of Cost to Complete 17 Annex 7. Procurement Plan 18 Sec 7.01 Process Thresholds and Reviews 18 Sec 7.02 Project Procurement Plan 19 Sec 7.03 National Competitive Bidding (NCB) 20 Annex 8. Anticorruption, Accounting and Auditing 21 Sec 8.01 Anticorruption 21 Sec 8.02 Accounting and Auditing 21 Annex 9. Performance Monitoring and Evaluation 22 Sec 9.01 Deliverables 22 Sec 9.02 Performance Indicators 22 Annex 10. Major Covenants 23 Sec 10.01 Sector Covenants 23 Sec 10.02 Financial Covenants 23 Sec 10.03 Safeguards Covenants 24 Sec 10.04 Other Covenants 25 Annex 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Review of Capture Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Kyrgyz Republic
    Part I Review of capture fisheries and aquaculture in the Kyrgyz Republic 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kyrgyz Republic (or Kyrgyzstan) is a mountainous country in Central Asia. It is rich in water resources compared with the neighbouring countries and regions. However, the fisheries and aquaculture sector is poorly developed. Total annual fish production is 71.4 tonnes. Even when the 3 000 tonnes imported from neighbouring countries is included, annual fish consumption in the country amounts to less than 1 kg per capita, compared with 16.5 kg on a global level. Kyrgyzstan was part of the former Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (former USSR) until 1991, and the fisheries sector was much more developed in the 1980s than at present. In the 1980s, national production reached 1 400 tonnes/year and large volumes of affordable fish for the population reached the country from other parts of the former USSR. The dissolution of the former USSR was followed by dramatic increases in prices of imported products including fish feeds and technology needed for aquaculture, causing fish prices to increase considerably for consumers. The economic difficulties that came in the wake of independence resulted in a dramatic decline in governmental support to fisheries and aquaculture. Most state-owned fish farms were privatized, and there was no longer an adequate budget available to undertake research, gather statistics or monitor the activities of the fisheries. In regard to capture fisheries, the most important management tool, since Soviet times, has been restocking with various commercial fish species (most introduced from watersheds elsewhere in the Russian Federation and Central Asia).
    [Show full text]
  • Toktogul Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project (RRP KGZ 46348-003)
    Toktogul Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project (RRP KGZ 46348-003) Initial Environmental Examination July 2014 KGZ: Toktogul Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project Prepared by the Open Joint Stock Company Electric Power Plants, Kyrgyz Republic IEE Report July 2014 OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS Kyrgyz Republic ADB - TA-8434 (KGZ) Power Sector Rehabilitation Project Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Rehabilitation of Toktogul HPP, Phase 2 4864P22/FICHT-14077148-v3 JSC “Electric Power Plants” 326, Jibek-Jolu avenue, Bishkek Kyrgyz Republic E-Mail: [email protected] Sarweystraße 3 ● 70191 Stuttgart Postfach 10 14 54 ● 70013 Stuttgart Tel.: 0711 8995-0 Fax: 0711 8995-459 www.fichtner.de Please contact: Harald von Büren Extension: 403 E-Mail: [email protected] Rev. Rev.-Datum Inhalt /Änderung Erstellt / Geändert Geprüft / freigegeben 0 4 July 2014 Draft IEE Report Back v. Bueren 1 18 July 2014 Final IEE Report Back v. Bueren 4864P22/FICHT-14077148-v3 Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank CAREC Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EPP Electric Power Plants HPP Hydro Power Plant HSE Health, Safety and Environment IEE Initial Environmental Examination PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls SAEPF State Agency on Environmental Protection and Forestry 4864P22/FICHT-14077148-v3 Rehabilitation of HPP Toktogul Phase 2 Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 1-1 1.1 Policy, Legal, and Administrative Framework 1-1 1.2 Description of the Project 1-1 1.2.1 Category of the Project 1-2 1.2.2 Implementation Schedule 1-2 1.2.3 Description of the Project and possible Impacts 1-2 1.3 Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1-5 1.4 Analysis of Alternatives 1-6 1.5 Information, Disclosure, Consultation, and Participation 1-6 1.6 Grievance Redress Mechanism 1-7 1.7 Environmental Management Plan 1-7 1.8 Summary Costs for Implementation of the Environmental Management Plan 1-8 1.9 Conclusion and Recommendation 1-9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Kyrgyz Republic's Energy Sector
    World Bank Energy and Extractives Global Practice ECA region Analysis of the Kyrgyz Republic’s Energy Sector Final Report May 2017 Supported by the Public Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility Table of Contents Abbreviations 6 Acknowledgements 7 Executive Summary 8 Introduction 11 1 Sector Background 12 1.1 Institutional and Regulatory Reforms 14 1.2 Tariff Reforms 17 2 Impact of the Reforms 20 2.1 Higher Tariff Revenues 20 2.2 Lower Sector Deficit 20 2.3 Lower Losses 22 2.4 Public Opinion of the Sector and Reforms 22 3 Remaining Challenges 24 3.1 Service Quality 24 3.2 Financial Viability 29 3.3 Affordability and Willingness to Pay 36 4 Potential Solutions to Sector Challenges 41 4.1 Solution 1: Continued Progress on Tariff Reforms 42 4.2 Solution 2: Prioritization and Rehabilitation of New Supply 46 4.3 Solution 3: Strengthening Governance and Regulation 50 Tables Table 1.1: Overview of the Power Generation Plants in the Kyrgyz Republic12 Table 2.1: Energy Sector Deficit, thousand KGS (Difference between Revenue and Actual Cost) 21 Table 3.1: Unmet Winter Consumption 28 Table 3.2: Average Import Costs (KGS/kWh) 30 Table 3.3: Cost of Service vs. Revenue by Customer Class (2016) 34 Table 3.4: Residential Tiered Tariffs (2016) 41 Table 4.1: Share of Connections with Consumption below 350 and 700 kWh (2014 average) 43 Table 4.2: Tariff Path under Tariff Increase Scenario 44 Figures Figure 1.1: Timeline of Sector Reforms 14 Figure 1.2: Regulation and Governance of the Electricity Sector 16 Figure 1.3: Organization and Institutional Structure of the Electricity Sector16 Figure 1.4: MTTP 2014 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Controls and Water Vulnerabilities in the Naryn River Basin, Kyrgyzstan: a Socio-Hydro Case Study of Water Stressors in Central Asia
    water Article Hydrologic Controls and Water Vulnerabilities in the Naryn River Basin, Kyrgyzstan: A Socio-Hydro Case Study of Water Stressors in Central Asia Alice F. Hill 1,2,*, Cholpon K. Minbaeva 2, Alana M. Wilson 1,2 and Rysbek Satylkanov 3 1 Geography department, University of Colorado-Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; [email protected] 2 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), Boulder, CO 80309, USA; [email protected] 3 Kyrgyz Institute of Water Problems and Hydropower, Bishkek 720033, Kyrgyzstan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-720-369-3009 Academic Editor: Daene C. McKinney Received: 16 March 2017; Accepted: 3 May 2017; Published: 5 May 2017 Abstract: Water vulnerabilities in Central Asia are affected by a complex combination of climate-sensitive water sources, trans-boundary political tensions, infrastructure deficiencies and a lack of water management organization from community to federal levels. This study aims to clarify the drivers of water stress across the 440 km Naryn River basin, headwater stem to the Syr Darya and the disappearing North Aral Sea. We use a combination of human and physical geography approaches to understand the meltwater-controlled hydrology of the system (using hydrochemical mixing models) as well as the human-water experience (via community surveys). Surveys indicate that current water stress is primarily a function of water management and access issues resulting from the clunky transition from Soviet era large-scale agriculture to post-Soviet small-plot farming. Snow and ice meltwaters play a dominant role in the surface and ground water supplies to downstream communities across the study’s 4220 m elevation gradient, so future increases to water stress due to changes in volume and timing of water supply is likely given frozen waters’ high sensitivities to warming temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Sites of Ysyk-Köl: Spiritual Power, Pilgrimage, and Art
    8AIGINE CULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER SACRED SITES OF YSYK-KÖL: SPIRITUAL POWER, PILGRIMAGE, AND ART Editors: Gulnara Aitpaeva Aida Egemberdieva Bishkek-2009 © 2009 Aigine Cultural Research Center 93 Toktogul st., Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 720040 The research and this publication were supported by The Christensen Fund, 394 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA This book has been reviewed in the Department of Archeology and Ethnography of the Jusup Balasagyn Kyrgyz National University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without the authors‘ permission. Chief Editor of the Project: Gulnara Aitpaeva Editors: Gulnara Aitpaeva, Doctor of Philology Aida Egemberdieva, Candidate of Philology The English version of the book was prepared by: Izabella Mier-Jędrzejowicz, Guljan Kudabaeva, Aida Alymbaeva Based on the Kyrgyz version: Ысык-Кµлдµг‰ ыйык жерлер: касиет, зыярат, µнµр; and Russian version: Святые места Иссык-Куля: паломничество, дар, мастерство. MB Sacred Sites of Ysyk-Köl: Spiritual Power, Pilgrimage, and Art. ISBN Kyrgyzstan Book House codes: UDK BBK M M CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE EDITORS....................................................................7 FOREWORD.................................................................................................9 PART I..........................................................................................................14 CHAPTER 1. SACRED SITES OF THE YSYK-KÖL............................14 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Republic
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 45353-001 (RETA 8015) June 2013 Kyrgyz Republic: Developing Water Resources Sector Strategies in Central and West Asia Financed by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund under the Water Financing Partnership Facility and ADB TASF-other sources Prepared by AHT Group AG Management and Engineering UNICON For the Asian Development Bank This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. CENTRAL AND WEST ASIA Developing Water Resources Sector Strategies in Central and West Asia Kyrgyz Republic (TA8015-REG) Submitted to: Asian Development Bank FINAL REPORT Submitted by: June 2013 ADB TA8015-REG Final Report Kyrgyz Republic CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – Kyrgyz Som (KS) (17 May 2013) KS1.00 = $0.020777 $1.00 = KS48.13 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BCR – benefit/cost ratio CBA – cost/benefit analysis DCP – Draft Concept Paper DWEM – Department of Water Economy and Melioration1 FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization FWOP – future without project GKR – Government of the Kyrgyz Republic ISF – irrigation service fee MoAM – Ministry of Agriculture and Melioration MOE – Ministry of Economy MOF – Ministry of Finance NGO – Non Governmental Organization NWC – National Water Council O&M – operations and maintenance OFWM – on-farm water management OIP – On-Farm Irrigation Project PIM – participatory irrigation management RAS – Rural Advisory Services SDC – Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SU – support unit TA – technical assistance WOP – Water Operational Plan WMIP – Water Management Improvement Project WUA(F) – Water Users Association (Federation) WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Ha – hectare km – kilometer m – meter m3 – cubic meter NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic ends on 31 December.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Implementation and Effectiveness of the National Drug
    Policy Research Paper №77 Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of the State Drug Policy of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2007-2010 Aida Abdraimova (HPAC) Julia Aleshkina (HPAC) Larisa Tsigelskaya (DS&MTD) Aisha Sulaimanova (DS&MTD) Bishkek 2012 1 Content 1. Background..……………………………………………………………………………………5 2. Goal and objectives of the evaluation.……………………………………………………….6 3. Evaluation materials and methodology………………………………………………………7 4. Evaluation results 4.1. Review of SDP (2007-2010): logical structure, introduction mechanisms, responsible persons, M&E…………………………………………………………………………9 4.2. Review of the current situation with drug supply for population of the country..…………………………………………………………………………….13 4.3. Affordability of drugs..…………………………………………………………..….20 4.4. Drug safety and quality. ………… ……………………………………………….30 4.5. Rational use of drugs.…………………...…………………………………………33 5. Conclusions..………………………………………………………………………………….45 6. Recommendations………………………………………………………………………….…46 7. Attachment 1 Logical structure of SDP……..……………………………………………..47 8. Attachment 2…………………………………………………………………………………..48 2 Acknowledgement Health Policy Analysis Center extends its deep gratitude to all managers of Family Medicine Centers and pharmacies in Bishkek, Chui, Issyk-Kul and Osh oblasts which have been involved into the study for their assistance and contribution to information collection. We would like to express out special gratitude to KFW for their financial support to conduction of the study. 3 Abbreviations BA Bronchial asthma WHO World Health Organization SDP State
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Freedom Concerns in Kyrgyzstan
    RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CONCERNS IN KYRGYZSTAN STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF JEHOVAH’S CHRISTIAN WITNESSES For the OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting, Warsaw, 24 September to 5 October 2012 Jehovah’s Witnesses have been active in Kyrgyzstan since at least the early 1950s when many Witnesses were forcibly relocated to Kyrgyzstan by U.S.S.R. authorities, after having spent years in exile in Siberia as punishment for the peaceful exercise of their religious beliefs. In August 1998, Jehovah’s Witnesses obtained national registration in Kyrgyzstan. However, in the southern regions of Kyrgyzstan, Jehovah’s Witnesses experience repeated harassment by local officials who insist that without registration of local religious organizations (LROs), Jehovah’s Witnesses cannot practice their religious beliefs. The officials then render LRO registration virtually impossible. Denial of LRO registrations In 2010, Jehovah’s Witnesses applied to register 4 LROs. Registration law. The Law arbitrarily imposes onerous burdens on registration of an LRO. Under Article 8(3) of the Law “On Freedom of Religion and Religious Organizations in the Kyrgyz Republic” of 31 December 2008, No. 282 (“KR Law on Freedom of Religion”), a religious organization must comprise not less than 200 adult citizens who are permanent residents of the Kyrgyz Republic. Article 10(2) requires that the list of 200 founding members must also be notarized and approved by the local city council. Osh, Naryn, and Jalal-Abad. The city councils of Osh, Naryn, and Jalal-Abad rejected the LRO applications, stating that they could not approve the list of members because there is no government order in place stipulating the process and criteria to be used.
    [Show full text]