Evaluation of FAO's Contribution to the Kyrgyz Republic. Annexes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of FAO's Contribution to the Kyrgyz Republic. Annexes OFFICE OF EVALUATION Country programme evaluation series Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to the KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ANNEXES July 2016 COUNTRY PROGRAMME EVALUATION SERIES Evaluation of FAO’s contribution to the Kyrgyz Republic ANNEXES FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF EVALUATION July 2016 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation (OED) This report is available in electronic format at: http://www.fao.org/evaluation The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. For further information on this report, please contact: Director, Office of Evaluation (OED) Food and Agriculture Organization Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 1, 00153 Rome Italy Email: [email protected] Photo credits: cover (top to bottom) ©FAO/Vyacheslav Oseledko; ©FAO/Sergey Kozmin; ©FAO/Vyacheslav Oseledko; ©FAO/Vyacheslav Oseledko; ©FAO/Sergey Kozmin; ©FAO/Sergey Kozmin; Evaluation of FAO’s contributions to the Kyrgyz Republic – Annexes Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................iv Map of Kyrgyzstan ...........................................................................................................................................v Acronyms and abbreviations ......................................................................................................................vi Annex 1: Terms of reference for the country programme evaluation in the Kyrgyz Republic ............................................................................................................1 Annex 2: Impact assessment of livestock projects ......................................................14 Annex 2.1: Impact Assessment of Irrigation Projects................................................ 36 Annex 2.2: Impact assessment of fisheries projects ................................................. 72 Annex 3: Assessment by Priority Area ........................................................................... 97 iii Evaluation of FAO’s contributions to the Kyrgyz Republic – Annexes Acknowledgements The Office of Evaluation of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) would like to thank all those who contributed to this report. This Country Programme Evaluation was prepared by a team led by Carlos Tarazona from the Office of Evaluation, and composed of Roman Mogilevskii, Kanat Tilekeyev and Nazgul Abdrazakova from the University of Central Asia, who reviewed FAO’s support to the development of plans, strategies and policies on food and agriculture; Nargiza Mazhidova and Gulnaz Kaseeva, who undertook case studies on fisheries and livestock projects, and assessed the contributions of the FAO country programme to sustainable management of natural resources; and Asyl Undeland, who undertook a case study on irrigation projects, assessed the contributions of FAO to rural poverty reduction and climate change adaptation, and coordinated the preparation of the first draft of the report. The evaluation team is grateful to all beneficiaries, stakeholders and FAO staff who generously gave their time and efforts to provide us with materials, documents, and information that served as a foundation for the report. Special gratitude goes to Dorjee Kinlay, FAO Country Representative, and Dinara Rakhmanova, former Deputy Country Representative, for extending their full support and sharing with the team their insights and vision on the future of FAO’s programme in Kyrgyzstan, as well as providing guidance and advice on persons to interview. We also wish to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic as well as FAO management and staff at headquarters, the Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia, and the Sub- regional Office for Central Asia. iv Evaluation of FAO’s contributions to the Kyrgyz Republic – Annexes Map of Kyrgyzstan v Evaluation of FAO’s contributions to the Kyrgyz Republic – Annexes Acronyms and abbreviations CBA Community-Based Association FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GEF Global Environmental Fund MoAA Ministry of Agriculture and Amelioration NGO Non-Governmental Organization REU Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia SAEPF State Agency for Environmental Protection and Forestry SEC Sub-regional Office for Central Asia SO Strategic Objective TCP Technical Cooperation Project UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme WFP World Food Programme WUA Water User Association vi Evaluation of FAO’s contributions to the Kyrgyz Republic – Annexes Annex 1: Terms of reference for the country programme evaluation in the Kyrgyz Republic 1. Introduction The FAO Office of Evaluation (OED) has been conducting country programme evaluations since 2005 to provide accountability to Member countries, national governments and development partners, and draw lessons and suggestions for programme improvement. Kyrgyzstan was selected as one of the countries in which to carry out a Country Programme Evaluation (CPE) in 2015. The Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Kyrgyzstan country evaluation are the result of the preparatory phase, consisting of: a desk review of existing external documentation1; a preliminary analysis of FAO’s portfolio of work in Kyrgyz Republic; and scoping interviews with FAO staff at the country, sub-regional and regional levels and in HQ. The ToRs also benefited from discussions held during the inception mission with a selected number of partners at the national level including government officials, donors, UN agencies, academia and civil society. The evaluation will cover the past five years of the programme (2011-2015); ongoing and pipeline projects will be referred to but unless conducted for a relatively long period these will not be evaluated in detail. These ToRs represent a guiding document for the Evaluation Team. Their purpose is to describe the programme in Kyrgyzstan and identify some key areas of work undertaken over the past five years, table the scope of the evaluation and define the initial evaluation work plan. The ToRs have been shared with and commented upon by FAO staff in the Country Office (CO), the Sub-regional Office for Central Asia (SEC), the Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia (REU) and key FAO stakeholders in the Kyrgyz Republic. A set of key questions has been developed to further define the objective and inform the methodology to be employed at different stages of the exercise. The methodology and the evaluation tools will be further developed by the team over the course of the evaluation. 2. Purpose of the evaluation The purpose of the evaluation is to provide inputs to better orient FAO’s programme in Kyrgyzstan, making it more relevant to the needs of the country. It will provide accountability to the Government and non-government partners, communities and resource partners in the country, as well as all member countries. It seeks to draw lessons and make recommendations that will be useful for FAO’s future engagement in the country. Besides providing lessons specifically on FAO’s work in Kyrgyzstan, the evaluation will also enrich FAO’s synthesis of findings and guidance for its country-level support. In addition to providing advice to management and staff at the national level on how to improve the impact and relevance of FAO’s programme, the evaluation will also identify potential areas for future interventions in line with FAO’s comparative advantage. This aim is particularly relevant in the case of this CPE, considering the progressive and recent reinforcement of the country programme in Kyrgyzstan, potentially opening up new areas of collaboration with the Government and other partners. The main audience for the evaluation, to which most of the lessons and recommendations will be addressed, are the FAO Representative, his staff, and the Government of Kyrgyzstan. Other important users of the evaluation are the Regional and Sub-regional Offices and FAO as a whole, including divisions in HQ and other Country Offices that will benefit and build on lessons
Recommended publications
  • Observance of the Right to Freedom from Torture in Closed Facilities of the Kyrgyz Republic
    ORING ORING ORING OBSERVANCEOBSERVANCE OFOF THETHE RIGHTRIGHT TOTO FREEDOMFREEDOM FROMFROM TORTURETORTURE ININ CLOSEDCLOSED FACILITIESFACILITIES OFOF THETHE KYRGYZKYRGYZ REPUBLICREPUBLIC MONITMONITORING.ORING. RESPONSE.RESPONSE. REHABILITREHABILITAATIONTION BISHKEK 2012 HUMAN RIGHTS MONIT HUMAN RIGHTS MONIT HUMAN RIGHTS MONIT OBSERVANCE OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM FROM TORTURE IN CLOSED FACILITIES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC MONITORING. RESPONSE. REHABILITATION BISHKEK 2012 УДК 347.1 ББК 67.99(2Ки)3 С 54 Observance of the right to freedom from torture in closed facilities of the Kyrgyz С 54 Republic. Monitoring. Response. Rehabilitation: Report. - Б. 2012. – 92 с. ISBN 978-9967-26-926-2 This report has been produced following the implementation of projects on “Addressing human rights in closed facilities in Kyrgyzstan through nationally-owned human rights mechanisms” and “Increasing police accountability with the introduction of civil society monitoring mechanisms” supported by the OSCE Centre in Bishkek as well as the Freedom House Project on Strengthening Human Rights in Kyrgyzstan financed by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The report is meant for public institutions, nongovernmental organizations, human rights defenders and other individuals who are interested in the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and conditions in temporary detention facilities and reception centres under the Ministry of Interior (MoI) and pre-trial and remand places of detention under the jurisdiction of the State Service for the Execution of Punishments (SSEP) under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. All opinions expressed herein belong to the authors of this report and should not be perceived as those reflecting the official position of the OSCE, USAID and Freedom House.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponimys with Ancient Turk Origins in the Balkans
    IBAC 2012 vol.2 TOPONIMYS WITH ANCIENT TURK ORIGINS IN THE BALKANS Prof .Ass. Hajiyeva GALIBA Nakhchivan State Univresity, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract One of the sources dealing with the ancient Turkic history are toponyms. Toponymic investigations show that most of the ancient geographical names which have spread in Eurosia, in Central Asia, from North Africa, to Eastern Turkistan even in Siberia and these names were formed before Roman and Byzantine periods. So development of toponymic investigations, study of the history of Turkic peoples and scientific investigation of existing geographical names which keep the history of Turkic peoples have great significance. One of the uninvestigated fields of the Turkic history are geographical names keeping historical facts within are the holy Balkan areas. The toponymic investigations carried on the Balkans show that these territories are the places were the ancient Turkic tribes were firstly settled and possessed. This fact is proved by the Turkic tribe names and by the words of different semantic meaning of the languages of Turkic tribes. The great deal of Balkan geographical names are the names derived out of ethnoniyms thus the names reflecting ancient Turkic tribe names (Astipos//Astepe//Ishtip, Izletdere, Vardar, Sofular, Gilan, Sahsuvar kariyesi, Kosalar village, Tatarli kariyesi, in the Kosova, Uskup, Usturumca, Kumanova, Propishtip, Kochana, Makedonska Kamenika in Makedony, Araz district, Arazli, Azman, Cepine, Coban, Chorlu, Culfalar, Horozlar, Kangirlar, Sakarli, Sungurlar, Karuk, Kaspi, Kaz//Kas, Kazancilar, Kecililer, Kuman, Padarlar, Sofular, Tatar, Uzlar in Bulgaria) show that Balkans historically were Turkic areas. Geographical names are the real witnesses of history. We must pay great attention to the scientific investigations of the geographical names in Balkan states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Romanian in Kazakhstan)
    International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences Volume 7, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) : 2349–5219 The Role of Etymology in Second Language Acquisition (The Case of Romanian in Kazakhstan) Dr. Nicolae Stanciu Research center "Discourse theory and Practice", "Dunarea de Jos (Lower Danube) " University of Galati, Institute of Romanian Language, Bucharest, Romania, Buketov Karaganda State University, Kazakhstan. Date of publication (dd/mm/yyyy): 05/05/2020 Abstract – Extensive research has shown great interest in the origins and evolution of Turkic cultures and languages underlying the importance of history, language and religion in building the ethnicity of different nations in Eastern Europe. However, less attention was paid to semantic convergences, divergences and evolutions of lexical items in the conceptual metaphors and phrases recovered in Romanian culture through Turkish and other south slavic intermediaries. Accidentally encountered in etymological dictionaries and studies, the Turkic elements have not benefited yet from a multidisciplinary research meant to point out the lines of continuity between old Turkic (Pechenges, Cuman and Tatar), those of Ottoman Turkish and their reverberations in Romanian language. In fact, words almost exclusively labelled as Turkish or those with unknown and multiple etymology, preserved in Romanian as relics found in various stylistically registers (academic, archaic, colloquial, popular, regional) as well as in anthroponomy and toponymy, have been recovered in the folklore and literature of the 19th to the 21st centuries. These have been found disguised in metaphorical expressions and symbols considered relevant for the spirituality of this multicultural space. Integrated into an evolution perspective, the concepts and metaphors analysed and interpreted within this article belong to extended cultural areas, and use symbols common to extremely various linguistic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia Kyrgyzstan’S Evolving Foreign Economic and Security Interests
    JUNE 2015 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301- 459- 3366 | www.rowman.com Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia Kyrgyzstan’s Evolving Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHORS Andrew C. Kuchins Jeffrey Mankoff Oliver Backes A Report of the CSIS Russia and Eurasia Program ISBN 978-1-4422-4100-8 Ë|xHSLEOCy241008z v*:+:!:+:! Cover photo: Labusova Olga, Shutterstock.com. Blank Central Asia in a Reconnecting Eurasia Kyrgyzstan’s Evolving Foreign Economic and Security Interests AUTHORS Andrew C. Kuchins Jeffrey Mankoff Oliver Backes A Report of the CSIS Rus sia and Eurasia Program June 2015 Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 594-61689_ch00_3P.indd 1 5/7/15 10:33 AM hn hk io il sy SY eh ek About CSIS hn hk io il sy SY eh ek For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to hn hk io il sy SY eh ek develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. ­Today, CSIS scholars are hn hk io il sy SY eh ek providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart hn hk io il sy SY eh ek a course toward a better world. hn hk io il sy SY eh ek CSIS is a nonprofit or ga ni za tion headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and hn hk io il sy SY eh ek develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 GE.19-05427 (E) 071119 081119 Committee Against Torture
    United Nations CAT/C/KGZ/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 2 April 2019 and Other Cruel, Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: Russian English, French Russian and or Punishment Spanish only Committee against Torture Third periodic report submitted by Kyrgyzstan under article 19 of the Convention pursuant to the optional reporting procedure, due in 2017*, ** [Date received: 31 January 2019] * The second periodic report of Kyrgyzstan (CAT/C/KGZ/2) was considered by the Committee at its 1192nd and 1195th meetings, held on 12 and 13 November 2013 (see CAT/C/SR.1192 and CAT/C/SR.1195). Having considered the report, the Committee adopted concluding observations (CAT/C/KGZ/CO/2). ** The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.19-05427 (E) 071119 081119 CAT/C/KGZ/3 Introduction 1. The present report is being submitted pursuant to article 19 (1) of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. It was prepared in accordance with the general guidelines regarding the form and contents of periodic reports to be submitted by States parties. It includes information on the implementation of the concluding observations of the Committee against Torture (CAT/C/KGZ/CO/2), replies to the Committee’s list of issues (CAT/C/KGZ/QPR/3) and additional information on the implementation of the Convention. 2. The report was prepared by an inter-agency working group established by decision of the Coordinating Council on Human Rights, which made use of information received from the State Penal Correction Service, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Supreme Court, the State Committee on National Security, the State Committee on Defence, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education and Science and the Ministry of Labour and Social Development.
    [Show full text]
  • JICA Kyrgyz Channel, December 2009
    For a better tomorrow for all Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in the Kyrgyz Republic Newsletter № 46 (December, 2009 - January, 2010) 1. Our Events To Support Kyrgyz Roads On January 25, 2010, minutes of discussion on a preparatory stage of a new Grant Aid Project to pro- vide road maintenance equipment was signed in the Ministry of Transportation and Communications by JICA, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Transportation and Communications. Within the framework of this Project, there are plans to supply 144 units of equipment for road repair operations (in- cluding holes patching and asphalt-concrete pavement overhaul), snow clearing, disaster clean-up operations and transportation of goods, for the total value of around 10 million US dollars and intended to service From left to right: Mr.K Mamaev, State Secretary, the MTC of the KR, roads in the Issyk-Kul and Chui Oblasts. Also, it is Mrs.D.Shaidieva, State Secretary, the MF of the KR, and Mr.Maruyama Hideaki, Resident Representative of JICA in the KR planned to set up 2 asphalt plants in the Issyk-Kul Oblast (near Barskoon village) and the Chui Oblast (near Tokmok city). The overall length of the road sections that this equipment will be used to service will comprise 662 km. By the way, in 2007 the Government of Japan already implemented one Grant Aid Project to pro- vide road maintenance equipment for the Naryn Oblast that included an asphalt plant and a stone- crushing plant for the Bishkek – Naryn – Torugart road. To finalize the signing of the Grant Aid Project, Japan’s Cabinet of Ministers’ consent is required, and this should happen no later than March, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Hydrological Processes (Floods, High Water, Lateral Erosion and Mudflows) in the Kara-Unkyur River Basin (Kyrgyzstan)
    Central Asian Journal of Water Research (2017) 3(1): 43-53 Special Issue on Water Hazards in Central Asia © The Author(s) 2017. Evaluation of hydrological processes (floods, high water, lateral erosion and mudflows) in the Kara-Unkyur River Basin (Kyrgyzstan) Moldobekov B. D. Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) ([email protected]) Abdibachaev U. A. Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) Kalashnikova O. Ju. Central-Asian Institute for Applied Geosciences (CAIAG) Abstract Almost in all river basins of Central Asia, with the onset of spring, the probability of natural disasters, such as floods, high water and related lateral erosion, increases. Especially, these phenomena often occur in large river basins of Fergana Valley, Kyrgyz ridge and Trans-Ili Alatau. The aim of this study was to identify vulnerable areas affected by erosion processes in the course of disastrous floods and high water in order to take preventive measures for protection of settlements, their territories and infrastructure. To identify vulnerable areas affected by erosion processes in the Kara-Unkyur River Basin, a complex of field methods of ground-based observation was implemented with the use of Remote Sensing (RS) data. Based on the obtained data, a degree of manifestation of exogenous geological processes was analyzed and evaluated. Recommendations for decision- making were elaborated and submitted to the state authorities (Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Kyrgyz Republic, MES). Keywords: catastrophic floods, erosion processes, Kara-Unkur River, remote sensing, hydrological processes. 1. Introduction Occurrence and development of hazardous hydrological events, such as floods, high water and lateral erosion, are determined by a set of natural conditions and a sum of development factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Impact and Financing of Infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic
    ADBI Working Paper Series MEASURING THE IMPACT AND FINANCING OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Kamalbek Karymshakov and Burulcha Sulaimanova No. 988 August 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute Kamalbek Karymshakov is an assistant professor at the Finance and Banking Department, Central Asian Research Center of the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University in Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic. Burulcha Sulaimanova is an assistant professor at the Economics Department also of the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. The Asian Development Bank refers to “Kyrgyzstan” as the Kyrgyz Republic. Suggested citation: Karymshakov, K. and B. Sulaimanova. 2019. Measuring the Impact and Financing of Infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic. ADBI Working Paper 988. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/measuring-impact-and-financing- infrastructure-kyrgyz-republic Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editorial Board
    https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2019.76.kazakh FROM THE EDITORIAL BOARD KAZAKH DIASPORA IN KYRGYZSTAN: HISTORY OF SETTLEMENT AND ETHNOGRAPHIC PECULIARITIES Bibiziya Kalshabayeva Professor, Department of History, Archeology and Ethnology Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Gulnara Dadabayeva Associate Professor, KIMEP University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Dauren Eskekbaev Associate Professor, Almaty University of Management Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Abstract: The article focuses on the most significant stages of the formation of the Kazakh diaspora in the Kyrgyz Republic, to point out what reasons contributed to the rugged Kazakh migration process in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and how it affected the forms and types of their settlements (compact or disperse). The researched issues also include the identification of factors provoked by humans and the state to launch these migrations. Surprisingly enough, opposite to the claims made by independent Kazakhstan leadership in the early 2000s, the number of Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan wishing to become repatriates to their native country is still far from the desired. Thus the article is an attempt to find out what reasons and factors influence the Kazakh residents’ desire to stay in the neighboring country as a minority. To provide the answer, the authors analyzed the dynamics of statistical variations in the number of migrants and the reasons of these changes. The other key point in tracing what characteristic features separate Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan and their kinsmen in Kazakhstan is the archival data, statistical, historical, and field sources, which provide a systematic overview of the largely unstudied pages of the history of the Kazakh diaspora.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Profile of KARAKOL CITY КАРАКОЛ Karakol City
    Investment Profile of KARAKOL CITY КАРАКОЛ Karakol City Brief presentation of the city Karakol is the fourth-largest city in Kyrgyzstan and is located near the eastern tip of Lake Issyk-Kul, about 150 km west of the Chinese border and 380 km east of the capital, Bishkek. It is the administrative capital of the Issyk-Kul Region in the country’s far east. Karakol’s untapped potential offers investors a variety of investment opportunities at affordable costs, with municipally owned land available for greenfield investments. Thanks to a mild climate and beautiful scenery, the city is known world-wide for its abundant recreational opportunities: Lake Issyk-Kul, skiing, hot springs, and suitable conditions for extreme sports such as paragliding, mountain biking, and mountaineering. It attracts investors from all over the world thanks to rich investment potential in areas such as hotels and restaurants, mountain tourism, honey production, animal breeding, dairy production, and cultivation and processing of fruits and vegetables. 2 КАРАКОЛ Karakol City General Information about Karakol City • Area: 52,000 sq. m. • Population: 75,100 as of January 1, 2018. • 39,900 people within an hour’s drive eastward (Ak-Suu district) • 34,775 people within an hour’s drive on the lake’s north shore (Tyup district) • 69,589 people within an hour’s drive on the lake’s south shore (Jeti-Oguz district) • Location: Karakol sits at the foot of the Teskei-Ala-Too mountain range, downstream of Karakol River, 12 km from the shore of Lake Issyk-Kul, and at 1690-1850 m above the sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Assessment of Damage and Needs
    COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency Project (RRP KGZ 54175-001) SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGE AND NEEDS A. The COVID-19 Pandemic 1. In December 2019, a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged and quickly spread around the world causing a surge in fatalities, especially among people with co-morbidities. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global COVID-19 pandemic on 11 March 2020. Initial data showed that up to 20% of symptomatic cases progressed into severe and critical cases requiring hospitalization with a global case fatality rate of 7% among all those that have formally reported as confirmed cases.1 Since then, over 6 million people had been infected globally and over 373,000 had died.2 COVID-19 mortality is much higher in the elderly and in general in persons with risk factors such as smoking, obesity and cardio-vascular diseases. 2. The Government of the Kyrgyz Republic announced the first cases of COVID-19 on 17 March 2020. On 24 March 2020, the Kyrgyz Republic declared a state of emergency in consultation with WHO. Borders were closed, followed by businesses and schools, and lockdown and social distancing were imposed. By 2 June 2020, there were 1,845 infected people (including 364 health workers), 1,219 recovered, and 17 deaths. B. Health Sector Capacity 3. The Kyrgyz Republic is particularly vulnerable to the COVID-19 pandemic. In its assessment of the country’s operational readiness for preventing, detecting and responding to a public health emergency, WHO assigned it a 2 out of 5, among the lowest in the region (footnote 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan Unrest and Refugees in Uzbekistan Situation Report #7 20 June 2010
    Kyrgyzstan Unrest and Refugees in Uzbekistan Situation Report #7 20 June 2010 This report was issued by ROMENACA Sub-regional Office for Central Asia. It covers the period 18 to 20 June (afternoon) 2010, local time. The next report will be issued on or around 21 June 2010. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIORITIES Flash Appeal for Kyrgyzstan calls for US$71 million to assist over 1 million people Kyrgyz forces have begun removing barriers in Osh Official reports of returns of refugees to Kyrgyzstan Assessment mission in Uzbekistan finds Government response well organized, but additional support is needed The volume of emergency supplies arriving at Andijan is increasing II. Situation Overview Kyrgyz forces began removing barriers in the city of Osh in southern Kyrgyzstan on 20 June, but reports indicate that obstacles still lie in the streets leading to several neighbourhoods. Communities have barricaded themselves inside Osh since the outbreak of violence 10 June. Overall, the situation remains tense and humanitarian access to the most affected regions in the south continues to be limited. The Government has extended the state of emergency in the Osh province districts of Uzgen and Aravan until 25 June. The security situation is still the main obstacle for humanitarian aid delivery. According to UNOSAT’s initial satellite imagery analysis there are 2,000 to 3,000 houses destroyed in Osh, most in residential areas. There has been little cross-border movement reported in the last 24 hours. The Kyrgyz Border Guard Service has reported that a total of 4,559 ethnic Uzbek nationals of Kyrgyzstan have returned to the country – most of these were returning to Kadamjay district in Batken province on 18-19 June.
    [Show full text]