Gardening: Horticultural Uses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gardening: Horticultural Uses Glime, J. M. 2017. Gardening: Horticultural Uses. Chapt. 7-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 5. Uses. Ebook 7-1-1 sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 October 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 7-1 GARDENING: HORTICULTURAL USES TABLE OF CONTENTS Horticultural Uses ...............................................................................................................................................7-1-2 Shipping and Protecting...............................................................................................................................7-1-3 Soil Conditioning.........................................................................................................................................7-1-3 Air Layering.................................................................................................................................................7-1-8 Pot Culture.................................................................................................................................................7-1-10 Potting Medium .........................................................................................................................................7-1-11 Dangers of Peat Culturing..........................................................................................................................7-1-12 Covering Pot Soil.......................................................................................................................................7-1-13 Culturing Mushrooms and Other Fungi.....................................................................................................7-1-13 Reforestation..............................................................................................................................................7-1-14 Container Gardens.............................................................................................................................................7-1-16 Bonkei........................................................................................................................................................7-1-18 Dish Gardens..............................................................................................................................................7-1-19 Bonsai........................................................................................................................................................7-1-21 Hanging Baskets........................................................................................................................................7-1-23 Terraria.......................................................................................................................................................7-1-23 Bryophytes as Pests...........................................................................................................................................7-1-28 Summary ...........................................................................................................................................................7-1-29 Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................................................7-1-30 Literature Cited .................................................................................................................................................7-1-30 7-1-2 Chapter 7-1: Gardening: Horticultural Uses CHAPTER 7-1 GARDENING: HORTICULTURAL USES Figure 1. Sphagnum species such as this S. russowii are commonly used in horticulture as bedding material. Photo by Michael Lüth. Horticultural Uses I was surprised that in my search for moss uses in peat moss as an amendment for clay soils, whereas animal horticulture I stumbled on a patent for culturing "moss dung was used for sandy soils (Raviv et al. 1986). Since seedlings" (Hiraoka 1995). The patent was to culture then, the need to keep plants alive during transfer made mosses that could henceforth be transplanted and grown in bryophytes a desirable medium because of their ability to a nursery. Hiraoka presented this as a means of reducing retain moisture. the necessity of collecting wild mosses and creating It is surprising how difficult it is today to find literature undesirable forest conditions due to drying soils and on the use of bryophytes in plant cultivation, despite the erosion. This consideration should serve as a warning for widespread sale of peat mosses for gardening, potting, air all who desire to use bryophytes for any commercial layering, and other uses. Rather, the use of mosses, purpose, and even on a small personal scale, collection can especially peat moss, seems to be assumed and publications produce local damage. concentrate on finding substitutions for it (e.g. Tripepi et "People have probably used organic materials as an aid al. 1996) or creating the right mix of moss and amendments for plant culture since the eve of human history, but (e.g. Chong & Lumis 2000; Shujun et al. 2004). documentation is scarce" (Raviv et al. 1986). Use of Horticulture is the largest market for moss products in organic materials, including mosses, may not have started Asia (Tan 2003), and probably in most North American that early, but if monkeys can discover the advantage of countries (Muir et al. 2006). In horticulture, mosses find a mosses for getting water to drink, why not? At the niche unparalleled in any other living bryophyte industry beginning of the 18th Century, we find reference to using (Nelson & Carpenter 1965; Tan 2003). In some parts of Chapter 7-1: Gardening: Horticultural Uses 7-1-3 the world, they are routinely mined (Clarke 2008). holding nutrients, especially from dust and rainfall, then Bryophytes, especially peat mosses (Figure 1), have played releasing them slowly over a much longer period than a major role in horticulture for centuries (Perin 1962; normal nutrient residency near the soil surface (Stewart Arzeni 1963; Adderley 1964, 1965). Although their use as 1977; Rieley et al. 1979; Scafone unpubl. data). part of the landscape in gardens has traditionally been mostly an Asian practice, they have commonly been used as soil additives and bedding for greenhouse crops, potted ornamental plants, and seedling beds (Cox & Westing 1963; Sjors 1980). They are stuffed into wire frames to make totem poles to support climbing plants (at the Mossers Lee Plant), topiary (Figure 2), moss-filled wreaths, or baskets (Thomason 1994), or for covering the soil in floral arrangements. One company advertises a birch bark pedestal topped by a moss globe. Figure 3. Aulacomnium palustre. Species of Dicranum used by the Shuswap Indians of North America to condition the soil for plant growth. Photo by Michael Lüth, with permission. Figure 2. A swan topiary exhibited in a pedestrian area of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Photo courtesy of David Long. Overuse of mosses is concerning in several countries. Thus, some horticulturists seek substitutes. The use of rice hulls may provide a more renewable alternative to Sphagnum (Figure 1) peat for horticulture usage (Sambo et al. 2008). Peat has more total pore space and a lower air- Figure 4. Dicranum scoparium. Species of Dicranum used by the Shuswap Indians of North America to condition the soil for filled pore space compared to rice hulls, coinciding with a plant growth. Photo by Janice Glime. higher water-holding capacity and the highest water content at container capacity. Nevertheless, peat had a lower Their ability to sequester nutrients varies with species available water content than the rice hulls, while releasing and type of nutrient. For most taxa, they do not compete its water more slowly. for soil nutrients like phosphorus, but can accumulate from Shipping and Protecting rainfall the potassium, magnesium, and calcium (Timmer 1970). When the mosses later dehydrate, their membranes Sphagnum (Figure 1) is almost indispensable for are damaged, making them leaky. When they rehydrate, shipping live plants, keeping them moist, yet free from nutrients can be dissolved and washed into the soil. It takes mold. In countries where peat is abundant, the damp peat a few hours to a day to repair the damaged membranes, is burned to produce a smoke screen against frost, hence giving the roots beneath a chance to retrieve the nutrients protecting the plants (Thieret 1954). This is one of its uses that are slowly being washed down from the dusty, leaky in Asian countries as well (Tan 2003). mosses. This is dependent also on the force of the rain, Soil Conditioning with light rains more likely to remain on the mosses long enough for them to absorb the nutrients. This seems to be The Shuswap Indians of North America use especially important for potassium, the most soluble and Aulacomnium (Figure 3) and Dicranum (Figure 4) mixed most easily leached nutrient. (See Nutrient chapter in with dirt to make plants healthier (Palmer 1975). As a soil Volume 1 for details.) conditioner, coarse-textured mosses increase water storage Peat, in particular, offers a number of properties capacity; fine-textured mosses provide air spaces (Ishikawa important to the growth of plants. To be suitable for most 1974; Bernier 1992; Bernier et al. 1995). Although root growth, the peat needs to have about equal proportions supporting experiments seem to be lacking, we
Recommended publications
  • The Ecology of the in the North York Moors National Park
    The ecology of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus in the North York Moors National Park by Miguel Eduardo Equihua Zamora A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology at the University of York November 1991 I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is the result of my own investigation and has not been accepted in previous applications for the award of a degree. Exceptions to this declaration are part of the field data used in chapter 4, which was collected and made available to me by Dr. M.B. Usher. The distribution map on Campylopus introflexus was provided by P.T. Harding (Biological Records Centre, ITE, Monks Wood). R.C. Palmer (Soil Survey and Land Research Centre, University of York) made available to me the soil and climatological data of the area, and helped me to obtain the corresponding interpolation values for the sampled sites. Miguel Eduardo Equihua Zamora 1 CONTENTS page Acknowledgements . 4 Abstract................................................. 5 1. Introduction 1.1 The invader: Campylopus introflexus ..................... 7 The invasion of the Northern Hemisphere ............... 7 Taxonomyand identity ............................ 13 Ecology....................................... 16 1.2 The problem ...................................... 19 1.3 Hypothetical mechanisms of interaction ................... 22 2. Aims of the research ......................................28 3. Description of the study area .................................29 4.Ecological preferences of Campylopus introflexus in the North York Moors National Park 4.1 Introduction ....................................... 35 4.2 Methods ......................................... 36 Thefuzzy c-means algorithm ........................ 39 Evaluation of the associations ........................ 43 Desiccation survival of the moss carpets ................ 44 4.3 Results .......................................... 45 Vegetationanalysis ............................... 45 Assessment of moss associations .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium
    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae
    Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae. Chapt. 1-11. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 1-11-1 Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-11: AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER METZGERIALES: ANEURACEAE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCLASS METZGERIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Order Metzgeriales............................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneuraceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura maxima ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-11-2 Aneura mirabilis .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-7 Aneura pinguis ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Microhabitat Heterogeneity Enhances Soil Macrofauna and Plant Species Diversity in an Ash – Field Maple Woodland
    Title Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash – Field Maple woodland Authors Burton, VJ; Eggleton, P Description publisher: Elsevier articletitle: Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash – Field Maple woodland journaltitle: European Journal of Soil Biology articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.04.012 content_type: article copyright: © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Date Submitted 2016-07-15 1 Microhabitat heterogeneity enhances soil macrofauna and plant species diversity in an Ash - Field 2 Maple woodland 3 4 Victoria J. Burtonab*, Paul Eggletona 5 aSoil Biodiversity Group, Life Sciences Department, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, 6 London SW7 5BD, UK 7 bImperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK 8 *corresponding author email [email protected] 9 10 Abstract 11 The high biodiversity of soil ecosystems is often attributed to their spatial heterogeneity at multiple 12 scales, but studies on the small-scale spatial distribution of soil macrofauna are rare. This case study 13 of an Ash-Field Maple woodland partially converted to conifer plantation investigates differences 14 between species assemblages of soil and litter invertebrates, and plants, using multivariate 15 ordination and indicator species analysis for eleven microhabitats. 16 Microhabitats representing the main body of uniform litter were compared with more localised 17 microhabitats including dead wood and areas of wet soil. Species accumulation curves suggest that 18 for this site it is more efficient to sample from varied microhabitats of limited spatial scale rather 19 than the broad habitat areas when generating a species inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Tasmanian Mosses
    15 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF TASMANIAN MOSSES by P.I Dalton, R.D. Seppelt and A.M. Buchanan An annotated checklist of the Tasmanian mosses is presented to clarify the occurrence of taxa within the state. Some recently collected species, for which there are no published records, have been included. Doubtful records and excluded speciei. are listed separately. The Tasmanian moss flora as recognised here includes 361 species. Key Words: mosses, Tasmania. In BANKS, M.R. et al. (Eds), 1991 (3l:iii): ASPECTS OF TASMANIAN BOTANY -- A TR1BUn TO WINIFRED CURTIS. Roy. Soc. Tasm. Hobart: 15-32. INTRODUCTION in recent years previously unrecorded species have been found as well as several new taxa described. Tasmanian mosses received considerable attention We have assigned genera to families followi ng Crosby during the early botanical exploration of the antipodes. & Magill (1981 ), except where otherwise indicated in One of the earliest accounts was given by Wilson (1859), the case of more recent publications. The arrangement who provided a series of descriptions of the then-known of families, genera and species is in alphabetic order for species, accompanied by coloured illustrations, as ease of access. Taxa known to occur in Taslnania ami Part III of J.D. Hooker's Botany of the Antarctic its neighbouring islands only are listed; those for Voyage. Although there have been a number of papers subantarctic Macquarie Island (politically part of since that time, two significant compilations were Tasmania) are not treated and have been presented published about the tum of the century. The first was by elsewhere (Seppelt 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Woodlands in the Lake District Mosses & Liverworts
    LIVERWORTS generally have two rows of leaves, one up each side of the stem We are Plantlife Further information For over 25 years, Plantlife has had a single ideal Bazzania trilobata Greater whipwort Plagiochila spinulosa Prickly featherwort – to save and celebrate wild flowers, plants and Books fungi. They are the life support for all our wildlife Mosses and Liverworts of Britain and Ireland: A Field Guide 3 and their colour and character light up our by Ian Atherton, Sam Bosanquet and Mark Lawley (British landscapes. But without our help, this priceless Bryological Society, 2010). The best field guide. 2 natural heritage is in danger of being lost. The Liverwort Flora of the British Isles by Jean Paton (Harley 3 Books, 1999). An in-depth guide to liverwort identification, From the open spaces of our nature reserves to for more advanced bryologists. the corridors of government, we work nationally The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland by A J E Smith and internationally to raise their profile, (2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 2004). 1 celebrate their beauty and to protect their future. An in-depth guide to liverwort identification, for more advanced bryologists. 2 Mosses and Liverworts by Ron Porley and Nick Hodgetts Where wild plants lead (Collins New Naturalist series, Harper Collins, 2005). Habitat Often forming dense, mounded colonies on earth banks and around tree bases; also on boulders, rotten wood and Habitat In loose mats or dense cushions on trees and rock faces, often close to rivers and streams. Wildlife follows A highly readable account of moss and liverwort ecology occasionally on tree trunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Household and Personal Uses
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Household and Personal Uses. Chapt. 1-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 5. Uses. Ebook sponsored 1-1-1 by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 5 October 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1 HOUSEHOLD AND PERSONAL USES TABLE OF CONTENTS Household Uses...................................................................................................................................................1-1-2 Furnishings...................................................................................................................................................1-1-4 Padding and Absorption...............................................................................................................................1-1-5 Mattresses.............................................................................................................................................1-1-6 Shower Mat...........................................................................................................................................1-1-7 Urinal Absorption.................................................................................................................................1-1-8 Cleaning.......................................................................................................................................................1-1-8 Brushes and Brooms.............................................................................................................................1-1-8
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12547 Evolution of niche preference in Sphagnum peat mosses Matthew G. Johnson,1,2,3 Gustaf Granath,4,5,6 Teemu Tahvanainen, 7 Remy Pouliot,8 Hans K. Stenøien,9 Line Rochefort,8 Hakan˚ Rydin,4 and A. Jonathan Shaw1 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 2Current Address: Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, Illinois 60022 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden 7Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland 8Department of Plant Sciences and Northern Research Center (CEN), Laval University Quebec, Canada 9Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Museum, Trondheim, Norway Received March 26, 2014 Accepted September 23, 2014 Peat mosses (Sphagnum)areecosystemengineers—speciesinborealpeatlandssimultaneouslycreateandinhabitnarrowhabitat preferences along two microhabitat gradients: an ionic gradient and a hydrological hummock–hollow gradient. In this article, we demonstrate the connections between microhabitat preference and phylogeny in Sphagnum.Usingadatasetof39speciesof Sphagnum,withan18-locusDNAalignmentandanecologicaldatasetencompassingthreelargepublishedstudies,wetested
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses Leucobryaceae Aj Fife
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES LEUCOBRYACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 48 – DECEMBER 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand : mosses. Fascicle 48, Leucobryaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-70-5 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1.Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.344.29(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/5zzx-2719 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2020: Leucobryaceae. In: Smissen, R. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand — Mosses. Fascicle 48. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/5zzx-2719 Date submitted: 21 Sep 2020; Date accepted: 22 Sep 2020; Date published: 2 January 2021 Cover image: Leucobryum javense, habit with capsule, dry capsule, dwarf ♂ plant on leaf, and cross section at mid leaf. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from J.E. Beever 31-28, CHR 406176, G. Brownlie 681, CHR 427667, and J.E. Beever 31-99, CHR 406114. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Key to Tlie Mosses of Isia Navarino, Chile (Prov
    Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 138,215-229 Article Stuttgart, November 2010 Preliminary key to tlie mosses of Isia Navarino, Chile (Prov. Antartica Chilena) William R. Buck^ and Bernard Goffinet^ ' Institute ofSystematic Botany, The New Yorl< Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY10458-5126, U.S.A. ^ Department ofEcology and Evolutionary Biology, 75North Eagleville Road, Universityof Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3043, U.S.A. With 6 figures Abstract: Isla Navarino is the southernmost permanently inhabited island in the world. The forests are dominated by Nothofagus spp. and the bedrock isacidic. To date 157 taxa of mosses have been collected from the island. The taxa are keyed and achecklist provides the voucher specimen information upon which the key was based. Key words:Chile, IslaNavarino, Provincia Antartica Chilena, subantarctic bryoflora. Introduction Isla Navarino is the largest of the Chilean Antarctic Islands, lying directly south of the Beagle Channel, opposite Argentinean Tierra del Fuego (Fig. 1). It is ca. 4000 km^ The island is the southernmost permanently inhabited island inthe world, but it is not heavily populated. The pro vincial capital, Puerto Williams, hosts most ofthe population and has only about 1100 people, mostly connected with the military base there. The entire Cape Horn Archipelago (including I. Navarino) has been declared a Biosphere and World Heritage Site by UNESCO (Rozzi et al. 2004). Although lying between 54°52'S and55°18'S latitude (and between 67° 03' W and 68° 22' W longitude), the temperature is reasonably mild because of the oceanic conditions. At lower el evations, the forests are dominated by three species of Nothofagus. Many of the forests are es sentially undisturbed.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation and Genetic Variability of Three Cryptic Species Within the Aneura Pinguis Complex (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta)
    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2016, 37 (1): 3-18 © 2016 Adac. Tous droits réservés Differentiation and genetic variability of three cryptic species within the Aneura pinguis complex (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta) Alina Bączkiewicz* & Katarzyna Buczkowska Department of Genetics, a. Mickiewicz university, umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland ABSTRACT – 1652 individuals of aneura pinguis from Poland were surveyed for variation in 12 putative gene loci. Based on isozyme data, we distinguished three cryptic species. No evidence for gene flow between these species was found. To date, no qualitative morphological characters are available, which would allow delimitation of the cryptic species of a. pinguis. Hence, these species are not formally described, but assigned as cryptic species A, B, and C. The mean genetic distance (D) between them is 1.3393. The highest genetic variation within populations (Hs) was found in species A, and the lowest in species B. Individual species of a. pinguis differ in their habitat preferences. Species A is the most common, it occurs mostly in the Western Carpathians, grows mainly on calcareous rocks and humus. Species B is the most frequent in the Eastern Carpathians on clay soil. Species C is the rarest, it can be found both in lowlands and mountains, but mainly in lowlands and on various substrata. All studied cryptic species occur partly sympatrically. Liverworts / Aneura pinguis / cryptic species / allozyme / cpDNA-trnL / genetic variation / geographic distribution / ecological preferences. RéSuMé – Différentiation and variabilité génétique de trios espèces cryptiques dans le complexe Aneura pinguis (Jungermanniidae, Marchantiophyta). Des investigations portant sur 12 loci enzymatiques ont été menées sur une population de 1652 individus d’aneura pinguis collectés en Pologne.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmy Pocket Moss (Fissidens Exilis) in Canada
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Pygmy Pocket Moss (Fissidens exilis) in Canada Pygmy Pocket Moss 2015 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2015. Management Plan for the Pygmy Pocket Moss (Fissidens exilis) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. iv + 16 pp. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including the COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: Steere 1950 Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion du fissident pygmée (Fissidens exilis) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2015. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/ Management Plan for the Pygmy Pocket Moss 2015 Preface The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed species of special concern and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry. The Minister of the Environment is the competent minister under SARA for the Pygmy Pocket Moss and has prepared this management plan as per section 65 of SARA.
    [Show full text]