Language and Modality: Effects of the Use of Space in the Agreement System of Lengua De Signos Española (Spanish Sign Language)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Language and Modality: Effects of the Use of Space in the Agreement System of Lengua De Signos Española (Spanish Sign Language) Language and modality: Effects of the use of space in the agreement system of lengua de signos española (Spanish Sign Language) LANGUAGE AND MODALITY: EFFECTS OF THE USE OF SPACE IN THE AGREEMENT SYSTEM OF LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA (SPANISH SIGN LANGUAGE) ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. D.C. van den Boom ten overstaan van een door het College voor Promoties ingestelde commissie, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Agnietenkapel op vrijdag 29 januari 2016, te 10:00 uur door BRENDAN DENIS NICHOLAS COSTELLO geboren te Manchester, Verenigd Koninkrijk (cc)2016)BRENDAN DENIS NICHOLAS (cc by-nc-sa 4.0) Promotiecommissie: Promotor: prof. dr. A.E. Baker Universiteit van Amsterdam Copromotores: dr. R. Pfau Universiteit van Amsterdam dr. M. A. Landa Arevalillo Universidad del País Vasco/ Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea Overige leden: prof. dr. P.C. Hengeveld Universiteit van Amsterdam prof. dr. E.O. Aboh Universiteit van Amsterdam prof. dr. J. Quer Villanueva Universitat Pompeu Fabra prof. dr. M. Steinbach Georg-August-Universität Göttingen dr. V. Kimmelman Universiteit van Amsterdam Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen This doctoral thesis was carried out in cotutelle between the University of Amsterdam and the University of the Basque Country. The research of this doctoral thesis received financial assistance from a doctoral scholarship from the Basque Government (ref. BFI05.149). Do m'athair, do mo mháthair, do mo dheirfiúr. I have been to hell and back. And let me tell you, it was wonderful. Louise Borgeois Table of contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XI ABBREVIATIONS OF SIGN LANGUAGE NAMES XVII NOTATION CONVENTIONS XIX 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. LANGUAGE AND MODALITY 2 1.1.1. Simultaneity in sign languages 4 1.1.2. Iconicity in sign languages 10 1.2. THE USE OF SPACE IN SIGN LANGUAGES 17 1.3. THE STUDY OF VERBAL AGREEMENT IN SIGN LANGUAGES 23 1.4. LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA (LSE) 25 1.4.1. LSE: historical background 27 1.4.2. LSE: sociolinguistic setting 29 1.4.3. Previous research on LSE 31 1.4.4. The LSE in this study 32 1.5. THE GOALS OF THIS THESIS 33 1.6. THE STRUCTURE OF THIS THESIS 34 2. THEORIES OF AGREEMENT 37 2.1. TWO APPROACHES TO AGREEMENT 38 2.2. TYPOLOGICAL APPROACH 42 2.2.1. Terminology 42 2.2.2. Controllers 43 2.2.3. Targets 45 2.2.4. Domains 56 2.2.5. Features and values 62 2.2.6. Conditions 72 2.2.7. Canonicity 74 2.2.8. Summary 77 2.3. THE MINIMALIST PROGRAM 78 2.3.1. Generativism: issues and developments 79 2.3.2. The architecture of the language faculty 85 2.3.3. Agreement and Agree 88 2.4. SUMMARY 94 3. AGREEMENT IN SIGN LANGUAGES 97 3.1. PRONOMINAL REFERENCE 98 3.1.1. Location assignment 99 3.1.2. Role shift 101 3.1.3. R-locus and space 103 3.2. AGREEING VERBS 107 3.2.1. Prototypical agreeing verbs 109 3.2.2. Backwards agreeing verbs 119 3.2.3. Single argument agreement 127 3.2.4. Summary 129 3.3. AGREEMENT AUXILIARIES 130 3.3.1. AUX 131 3.3.2. Auxiliaries derived from lexical verbs 134 3.3.3. PAM 137 3.3.4. Issue arising: what agreement auxiliaries tell us about agreement 140 3.4. NON-MANUAL AGREEMENT 142 3.4.1. Head tilt and eye gaze as markers of subject and object agreement 143 3.4.2. Non-manual agreement in role shift 147 3.4.3. Summary 149 3.5. DP-INTERNAL AGREEMENT 150 3.6. SUMMARY 153 4. METHODOLOGY 157 4.1. METHODOLOGICAL CHALLENGES: THE ELUSIVE NATIVE SIGNER 157 4.2. INFORMANTS 160 4.3. DATA COLLECTION AND MATERIALS 163 4.4. TRANSCRIPTION 165 4.5. DATA ANALYSIS 167 4.6. SUMMARY 167 5. AGREEMENT PHENOMENA IN LSE 169 5.1. PRONOMINAL REFERENCE 170 5.1.1. Location assignment in LSE 170 5.1.2. Role shift in LSE 175 5.2. AGREEING VERBS 179 5.2.1. Prototypical agreeing verbs 180 5.2.2. Backward agreeing verbs 183 5.2.3. Single argument agreement 184 5.3. AGREEMENT AUXILIARIES 189 5.3.1. AUX 190 5.3.2. Auxiliaries derived from lexical verbs: GIVE-AUX and BEAT-AUX 194 5.3.3. PERS 197 5.3.4. Summary 200 5.4. CONSTRAINTS ON VERBAL AGREEMENT 200 5.4.1. Semantic constraints on agreeing verbs 201 5.4.2. Phonological constraints on agreeing verbs 203 5.5. NON-MANUAL AGREEMENT 210 5.6. DP-INTERNAL AGREEMENT 213 5.7. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 221 6. LSE AGREEMENT FROM A CROSS-MODAL TYPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 227 6.1. CONTROLLERS 228 6.2. TARGETS 229 6.2.1. Verbs and auxiliaries 229 6.2.2. Other targets of agreement 231 6.2.3. Means of exponence 231 6.2.4. Multiple exponence 238 6.2.5. Summary 238 6.3. DOMAINS 239 6.3.1. Clause-internal agreement 239 6.3.2. Agreement beyond the clause 241 6.4. FEATURES AND VALUES 242 6.4.1. Gender 243 6.4.2. Number 243 6.4.3. Person 247 6.4.4. Other features: respect and case 253 6.4.5. Summary 255 6.5. CONDITIONS 256 6.6. CANONICITY 259 6.6.1. Applying Corbett’s criteria to spatial agreement in LSE 261 6.6.2. Applying Corbett’s general principles to spatial agreement in LSE 267 6.6.3. Other evaluations of the canonicity of sign language agreement 270 6.6.4. Summary 271 6.7. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 272 7. FORMAL ANALYSES OF AGREEMENT IN LSE 277 7.1. LOCATION, IDENTITY AND LOCATING IDENTITY 278 7.1.1. The location of ϕ-features 280 7.1.2. The location of the identity feature 282 7.1.3. Optionality of the use of space 286 7.2. ACCOUNTING FOR SPATIAL AGREEMENT IN LSE 287 7.2.1. Location assignment 287 7.2.2. Verbal agreement 289 7.2.3. Pragmatic agreement 294 7.2.4. Summary 298 7.3. “DEFECTIVE” AGREEING VERBS IN LSE: AN OT ACCOUNT 300 7.3.1. “Defective” agreeing verbs in LSE 301 7.3.2. OT constraints 302 7.3.3. Applying the constraints 303 7.3.4. Extending the analysis to ISL data 308 7.4. ISSUES ARISING 309 7.4.1. Optionality (revisited) 309 7.4.2. Locative versus locus 310 7.4.3. Linearity 312 7.5. CONCLUSIONS 314 8. CLOSING REMARKS 317 8.1. WHAT THIS STUDY TELLS US… 318 8.1.1. …about LSE 318 8.1.2. …about sign languages in general 320 8.1.3. …about language 325 8.2. WHAT THIS STUDY DOES NOT TELL US 327 8.3. FUTURE DIRECTIONS 329 REFERENCES 333 LANGUAGE AND MODALITY: EFFECTS OF THE USE OF SPACE IN THE AGREEMENT SYSTEM OF LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA (SPANISH SIGN LANGUAGE) (SUMMARY) 371 TAAL EN MODALITEIT: EFFECTEN VAN HET GEBRUIK VAN RUIMTE BINNEN HET CONGRUENTIESYSTEEM VAN LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA (SPAANSE GEBARENTAAL) (SAMENVATTING) 377 LENGUAJE Y MODALIDAD: EFECTOS DEL USO DEL ESPACIO EN EL SISTEMA DE CONCORDANCIA DE LA LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA (RESUMEN) 383 HIZKUNTZA ETA MODALITATEA: LENGUA DE SIGNOS ESPAÑOLA (ZEINU HIZKUNTZA ESPAINIARRA)-REN KONMUZTADURA SISTEMAK ESPAZIOAREN ERABILERAN DITUEN EFEKTUAK (LABURPENA) 389 Acknowledgements Several years ago, I cadged a lift from Juan Uriagereka down to Bilbao from Vitoria after a seminar of his. When Juan asked me how I’d got into linguistics, I said it was a long story. “Yeah, it usually is,” came Juan’s judicious reply. This thesis has been no less of a long story, and there are many people that have played their part in contributing to this project and whom I’d like to thank. Here’s the story. I first started working on linguistics and sign language when I was studying for an MA in Applied Linguistics in 1998. A couple of excellent teachers on that course, Max Wheeler and Melanie Green, not only gave me a solid foundation in and an appetite for Linguistics, but were also instrumental in encouraging me to continue in research. At this time I made my first inroads into the Deaf Community and had the good fortune to meet and befriend Simon Hesselberg, whose interest in my work and support (from lending books to putting me in touch with colleagues) was a privilege. Moving to Bilbao in the Basque Country put a slight hold on my plans to research sign language but it wasn’t long before I found someone who was interested in the linguistics of sign language. I met Jon Ortiz de Urbina at sign language classes at the Deaf People’s Association of Bilbao and Biscay. A formal linguist of great standing and an all-round great guy, Jon was my fall on the road to Damascus. Jon soon organized an informal group and managed to get funding to make contacts with other research groups. Jon put me in touch with Alazne Landa, eventually to be one of my supervisors for this thesis. At our first meeting, Alazne patiently and bemusedly listened to me ramble on about how fascinating sign language was and mouth off about how dreadful the Spanish bureaucracy was at recognizing my foreign qualifications. Most people would have been mildly disturbed by such candour, but Alazne took on the mantle of advocate of sign language in the University of the Basque Country. For five years, a Sign Language Week was held every year at the University of the Basque Country and this would never have happened without her drive and initiative.
Recommended publications
  • Hazardous Digits: Telephone Keypads and Russian Numbers in Tbilisi, Georgia ⇑ Perry Sherouse
    Language & Communication 37 (2014) 1–11 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Language & Communication journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/langcom Hazardous digits: Telephone keypads and Russian numbers in Tbilisi, Georgia ⇑ Perry Sherouse University of Michigan, United States article info abstract Article history: Why do many Georgian speakers in Tbilisi prefer a non-native language (Russian) for pro- viding telephone numbers to their interlocutors? One of the most common explanations is that the addressee is at risk of miskeying a number if it is given in Georgian, a vigesimal Keywords: system, rather than Russian, a decimal system. Rationales emphasizing the hazards of Sociotechnical system Georgian numbers in favor of the ‘‘ease’’ of Russian numbers provide an entrypoint to dis- Telephone cuss the social construction of linguistic difference with respect to technological artifacts. Language ideology This article investigates historical and sociotechnical dimensions contributing to ease of Numeral system communication as the primary rationale for Russian language preference. The number key- Numbers pad on the telephone has afforded a normative preference for Russian linguistic code. Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Near the end of the much-beloved Soviet film Mimino (1977), there is a memorable scene in which the protagonist, a Georgian airplane pilot, places a phone call from a payphone in Berlin. Mimino, played by actor Vakhtang Kikabidze, attempts to make a phone call to a town in Georgia called Telavi. The telephone operator instead connects him to Tel Aviv, Israel. Coincidentally, a Georgian in Tel Aviv answers the phone. It quickly becomes clear to Mimino that he has not reached Telavi, but his interlocutor in Tel Aviv urges him to stay on the line.
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Notation: a Comparative History
    This page intentionally left blank Numerical Notation Th is book is a cross-cultural reference volume of all attested numerical notation systems (graphic, nonphonetic systems for representing numbers), encompassing more than 100 such systems used over the past 5,500 years. Using a typology that defi es progressive, unilinear evolutionary models of change, Stephen Chrisomalis identifi es fi ve basic types of numerical notation systems, using a cultural phylo- genetic framework to show relationships between systems and to create a general theory of change in numerical systems. Numerical notation systems are prima- rily representational systems, not computational technologies. Cognitive factors that help explain how numerical systems change relate to general principles, such as conciseness and avoidance of ambiguity, which also apply to writing systems. Th e transformation and replacement of numerical notation systems relate to spe- cifi c social, economic, and technological changes, such as the development of the printing press and the expansion of the global world-system. Stephen Chrisomalis is an assistant professor of anthropology at Wayne State Uni- versity in Detroit, Michigan. He completed his Ph.D. at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, where he studied under the late Bruce Trigger. Chrisomalis’s work has appeared in journals including Antiquity, Cambridge Archaeological Jour- nal, and Cross-Cultural Research. He is the editor of the Stop: Toutes Directions project and the author of the academic weblog Glossographia. Numerical Notation A Comparative History Stephen Chrisomalis Wayne State University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521878180 © Stephen Chrisomalis 2010 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • MUL TILANGUAGE TRANSLATION of NUMERALS by PROLOG Bengt
    MUL TILANGUAGE TRANSLATION OF NUMERALS BY PROLOG Bengt Sigurd INTRODUCTION The present paper describes a program (Nummer.pro), which has been developed for PC (MSDOS) in PDC prolog (Prolog Development Center, DK-2605 Broendby). It translates numerals (English, Burmese, Georgian, French and Japanese) and is based on a general theory of numerals, which presumably can be applied to all numeral systems in the world, although with varying success - related to number of exceptions. Languages will show different types of deviations from the general model (cf below). The general model accounting for the structure of numerals is formalized by the following rule: Numer al --> ... (U G3) (U G2) (U Gl) (U GO) In this generative rule U isa unit numeral and G0,Gl,G2,etc. are group numerals. The English numeral "two hundred" consists of the unit (U) numeral "two" and the group (G) word "hundred", which is G2 in the formula. There are no other constituents in this case. An expression within parentheses is called a group constituent. The meaning (value) of such a group constituent is the meaning of the unit word multiplied by the meaning of the group word, in this case 2*100=200, as expressed in the ordinary (decimal) mathematical system. A numeral may consist of one or several such group constituents. The numeral "three hundred and thirty three" consists of three group constituents (disregarding "and"): (three hundred) (thir ty) (three) 117 Some of the irregularities hinted at above show up in this example. The unit numeral for 3 has different forms (the allomorphs three/thir) in its different occurrences and it seems to be more natural to treat thirty, and the numeral thirteen, as complexes not to be further analyzed synchronically (only etymologically).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1808.06068V1 [Cs.CL]
    SeVeN: Augmenting Word Embeddings with Unsupervised Relation Vectors Luis Espinosa-Anke and Steven Schockaert School of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, UK {Espinosa-AnkeL,SchockaertS1}@cardiff.ac.uk Abstract We present SeVeN (Semantic Vector Networks), a hybrid resource that encodes relationships between words in the form of a graph. Different from traditional semantic networks, these re- lations are represented as vectors in a continuous vector space. We propose a simple pipeline for learning such relation vectors, which is based on word vector averaging in combination with an ad hoc autoencoder. We show that by explicitly encoding relational information in a ded- icated vector space we can capture aspects of word meaning that are complementary to what is captured by word embeddings. For example, by examining clusters of relation vectors, we observe that relational similarities can be identified at a more abstract level than with tradi- tional word vector differences. Finally, we test the effectiveness of semantic vector networks in two tasks: measuring word similarity and neural text categorization. SeVeN is available at bitbucket.org/luisespinosa/seven. 1 Introduction Word embedding models such as Skip-gram (Mikolov et al., 2013a) and GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014) use fixed-dimensional vectors to represent the meaning of words. These word vectors essentially cap- ture a kind of similarity structure, which has proven to be useful in a wide range of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Today, one of the major applications of word embeddings is their interaction with neural network architectures, enabling a kind of generalization beyond those words that were only observed during training.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Our Present Numbering System: an Histo
    A STUDY OF OUR PRESENT NUMBERING SYSTEM: AN HISTO~t CAL A~RO&~H A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FUIJFILLMBNT OF THE REQUIREMBNTS FOR THE DE(~?.EE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE BY MAE FRANCES WIlSON DEPA1~rMBNT OF MATHEMATICS ATLANTA, GEORGIA AUGUST 196t~ ii ~‘- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES. • . • • • • Iii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION. .• . 1 II. NU_~4ERATION . 3 III. SYSTE~ ND THEIR PROPERTIES. 10 B IBLIOGf?JkFHY. , • • . • • 22 ii EGYPTIAN NUMERALS I I A VtR.TICaL 10 (1 A HE~i.- BONE 10 A [email protected] I. 0~ A~~° A LÔTUS 1. ü~ I k POINTIkI6 IU A 6u9%8o1 FsU 1. 0 ~ A- (4111” 1W A-$TON~$JtM~VT Figure 1 iii AT ~ a.xn~ç~ ill III UU~Od,d, III UUU~Ø~ =(Ub4(QIJS-~o I) b4 (~c?I)/ ~b..cb1 l(1IVVU&~ =(V(oI)E09~h~Z III L)ULI = (i)S4-(o~)L 5L IIIL)L) (,)~-f-(oOZ = Ii V :~7:J ~ ~ (~~o” # ~ 0/)£ ~ (‘i, 01)1 ~1Q £ I S?~I~EJWnN NVIJ~J~-D~ A 6 —~(4oV4Q14.Q1 AAA >~~PI~P’>I~ L2 Q~. — Q?4O~ 1,1 A> II > 0l AAIAA~AA1L b AAAAAAA L 9 S ~AAA ~A4 Al Z A I ~~Wri/q fV~bNINQ7A~’d~ STht~3’~WnN ~io~ I~T~U1N ~TvINQ~UEya OOb, L~ Ob e b c9oo~’ LL8 ILOOL cOL X009 09 9 c?,QQS (LOS (LOOI7 71 Oh ~L- OQE D OO~ )I OZ 0~ 00/ 7 0/ ~IY~{~W11t~ )I~O S a.zn2T~ COb 00~ CCL 009 00.9 OOtT 001 002 00/ L~ L UQLL~ S~T3~QNnH Oh Q~OL 09 OS 0*701 OZ 0? SN3± b~~9S-&~ZI qLL[LLLLCt~~ S~LINfl $IV~WflN ~ 9 e.in2t~ ~,1- co’ 4- 01 itt b 37d WYX~ 9 -ç 4.7 z I 5 7j1≥13(AJPAJ 3~3/IVd4’I— 3S3IVIfI) 741>13W fiN ~‘flQ ~I~HflN ~S~vdvf-~9~NIHD L ‘~T~!i •~7’~74,4J Qb’ FQ~/ ~v ~, Ob~ ~J9h-6 ~ZL ‘q~’ wi ~44OA/ -% A’~VW..t f7~fs~3,4/g4/ ~ b VA L C’? ~ ~4 I Q’b’ 914 ~9A 000/ P~ ~ $~TVV~flN ~IEWV-flG$EIR CHI&PrER I INTRODUCTION The meaningful approach to the teaching of arithmetic is widely accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Language
    M. Nikolaishvili N. Bagration-Davitashvili Georgian Language (Intensive Course) Tbilisi 2012 1 УДК 809.463.1 N67 The present work represents the English version of M.Nikolaishvili’s book «Грузинский Язык» («Georgian Language») published in 1999. which is recognised by the Ministry of Education of Georgia as a sound basic course text book of the Georgian Language for the non-Georgian students. The course includes all topics needed for everyday relations and also gives an idea of the basic grammatical peculiarities of the Georgian language. The book can be used as a self study course as well. Editor Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor E. Babunashvili, K. Gelashvili Reviewers: Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor F. Uturgaidze, Professor T. Injia Proof Reader: Lydia West. Technical Editor: P. Korkia All rights reserved. © M. Nikolaishvili, N. Bagration-Davitashvili ISBN 978-9941-0-4539-4 BY THE AUTHOR The present book represents a basic course of the Georgian language, with a preface stating the general characteristics of the grammar of this language. The book begins with the study of writing and reading. Then follow texts, that encompass all the main topics of the language spoken in everyday life and are intended for an exact knowledge of the spoken Georgian language. There are ten topics in the book and each of them is divided into sections short texts, composed of the most frequently used words, grammatical explanations, the need of which may arise from the text. The explanations concern other forms of individual words marked with an asterisk. Ibidem are exercises, lexical groups connected with a topic, and at the end, a text that includes represented dialogues on certain subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 MISCELLANEOUS NUMBER BASES. the VIGESIMAL
    The Number Concept: Its Origin and Development By Levi Leonard Conant Ph. D. Chapter 7 MISCELLANEOUS NUMBER BASES. THE VIGESIMAL SYSTEM. In its ordinary development the quinary system is almost sure to merge into either the decimal or the vigesimal system, and to form, with one or the other or both of these, a mixed system of counting. In Africa, Oceanica, and parts of North America, the union is almost always with the decimal scale; while in other parts of the world the quinary and the vigesimal systems have shown a decided affinity for each other. It is not to be understood that any geographical law of distribution has ever been observed which governs this, but merely that certain families of races have shown a preference for the one or the other method of counting. These families, disseminating their characteristics through their various branches, have produced certain groups of races which exhibit a well-marked tendency, here toward the decimal, and there toward the vigesimal form of numeration. As far as can be ascertained, the choice of the one or the other scale is determined by no external circumstances, but depends solely on the mental characteristics of the tribes themselves. Environment does not exert any appreciable influence either. Both decimal and vigesimal numeration are found indifferently in warm and in cold countries; in fruitful and in barren lands; in maritime and in inland regions; and among highly civilized or deeply degraded peoples. Whether or not the principal number base of any tribe is to be 20 seems to depend entirely upon a single consideration; are the fingers alone used as an aid to counting, or are both fingers and toes used? If only the fingers are employed, the resulting scale must become decimal if sufficiently extended.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirel'fflnts for ATLANTA, GEORGIA
    ON FRACTIONS IN SOME NUMERATION SYSTEMS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREl'fflNTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE BY THEODORE ROOSEVELT NICHOLSON DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ATLANTA, GEORGIA JANUARY 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 A, Historical Background 1 B. Definitions 3 CHAPTER II FRACTIONS IN THE DECIMAL SYSTEl'I OF NUMERATION.... $ A. General Representation of Fractions 5 B. Conversion of Base Ten Fractions in Other Numeration Systems 5 C. Converting Any Decimal Fraction to Any Other System 8 D. Conversion of Fractions in Non-decimal Systems to Fractions in the Decimal System... 11 CHAPTER III ARITHMETICAL COMPUTATIONS 13 A. Addition of Fractions in Different Numeration Systems 13 B. Multiplication of Fractions in Different Numeration Systems 15 BIBLIOGRAPHY 18 ii \ « CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Much enphasis has been put on the expression of integers in base systems other than ten, but very little work has been done in the field of numeration systems regarding expression of fractions. Currently, many textbook writers are including this material in books for elemen- tary, junior and senior high schools. Many believe that the conversion of integers from one numeration system to another increases the stu¬ dent's computational ability. The author of this thesis through years of teaching experience has observed repeatedly that students experience great difficulty with computations involving fractions, and since stu¬ dents develop skills in arithmetical computations to a high degree by the use of integers and fractions, it is the purpose of this thesis to present methods of converting fractions from one system of numeration to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Different Number Bases Into the Elementary School Classroom
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2006 Incorporating Different Number Bases into the Elementary School Classroom. Crystal Michele Hall East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Hall, Crystal Michele, "Incorporating Different Number Bases into the Elementary School Classroom." (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2220. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2220 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Incorporating Different Number Bases into the Elementary School Classroom _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Mathematics East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Mathematical Science _____________________ by Crystal Michele Hall August, 2006 _____________________ Anant Godbole, Chair George Poole Rick Norwood Keywords: Base, Rote, Elementary, Education, Place value ABSTRACT Incorporating Different Number Bases into the Elementary School Classroom by Crystal Michele Hall Since becoming an educator and gaining extensive classroom experience, I have concluded that it would be beneficial to elementary school children to learn other number bases and their basic functions and operations. In this thesis, I have developed five units involving lesson plans for incorporating various number bases into the existing curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Research in Danish Cardinal and Ordinal Numerals on Indo-European Background
    FOLIA SCANDINAVICA DOI: 10.1515/fsp-2015-0002 VOL. 16 POZNA Ń 2014 A SHORT RESEARCH IN DANISH CARDINAL AND ORDINAL NUMERALS ON INDO-EUROPEAN BACKGROUND BŁA ŻEJ GARCZY ŃSKI Adam Mickiewicz University in Pozna ń ABSTRACT . The article focuses on the Danish numerals 1-1000. It presents their Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Germanic, Old Danish and present forms whilst providing additional information on their development and corresponding numerals in other European languages. It focuses primarily on the vigesimal counting system, whose traces can be found in Danish, and which is the source of some unique forms unseen in other languages. Therefore, special attention is paid to the numerals of the series 50-90. Though these appear to be unique and exotic, the article shows that they are not to be perceived as an anomaly but rather a different path of development within the language Moreover, a brief explanation of the origins of the vigesimal system in Danish is provided. Also, several units of measurement showing traces of the vigesimal, duodecimal and sexagesimal systems are discussed. Finally, language reforms aimed at changing the numeral forms will be shortly portrayed. 1. INTRODUCTION Danish is, as are its Scandinavian and Germanic relatives, a descendant of Proto-Indo-European (PIE). Therefore, its numeral forms are chiefly inherited from PIE. In the article, Danish cardinal and ordinal numbers will first be investigated by shortly describing the PIE counting system and the possibility of its reconstruction. Further on, several counting systems that have different numeral bases which can be found among European languages will be distinguished.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87818-0 - Numerical Notation: A Comparative History Stephen Chrisomalis Index More information Index Numerical notation systems are indexed alphabetically by name of system (e.g., “Aramaic numerals”). Number words are indexed under “lexical numerals, Language-name” (e.g., “lexical numerals, English”). Writing systems are indexed under “writing system, Script-name” (e.g., “writing system, Greek”). abacists 123, 147, 220 Aegean numerical notation systems abacus 97, 104, 115–6, 123–4, 144, 147, 182, 218, See Linear A / Linear B numerals 220, 259, 264, 266, 269, 315 Afro-Asiatic languages 319 Gerbert’s abacus 220 Agabo 152 ghubar 218 Agora (Athens) 100, 142 Greco-Roman 266 Agrippa of Nettesheim 354 Inka 315 Ahar stone inscriptions 197 pebble-board 97, 104, 144 Akinidad stela 52, 53 and Roman numerals 115–16, 124 Akkadians 71, 243–4, 248 schety 182 Akko 76 soroban 264 aksharapallî numerals 205, 210–13 suan pan 259, 264, 269 Aksumites 153 Abaj Tabalik 288 Albelda (Logrono), Spain 219 Abbasid caliphate 219, 403 al-Biruni 170 Abraham ibn Ezra 159, 184, 216, 237 Alexander the Great 143, 388 abstract numbers 18, 237 Alexandria 153, 192 abugida See alphasyllabary Alexandrine conquest 252, 258, 413 Abusir papyri 43, 47 Alexandrine period 104, 143, 192 Achaeans 64 Algorismus vulgaris 221 Achaemenid Empire 73, 76, 86, 83, 92, 142, 249, algorithmists 123, 147, 221 256–8, 413 al-Jāhiz 215 acrophonic principle 102–3, 107–8, 128, 435 al-Khwārizmī, Muhammad ibn Mūsā 128, 166, Adab al-kuttāb 215 214, 217 Adair, James 348
    [Show full text]